Materials Chemistry A: Journal of
Materials Chemistry A: Journal of
Materials Chemistry A
View Article Online
PAPER View Journal | View Issue
Published on 21 April 2017. Downloaded by National Institute of Technology - Rourkela on 3/8/2019 5:30:07 AM.
In this study, we devised an easy and simple approach to synthesize a composite of flower-like cobalt–
nickel–tungsten–boron oxides (Co–Ni–W–B–O) that were doped with reduced graphene oxide (rGO);
the composite was designed for supercapacitor applications. A Co–Ni–W–B alloy was first deposited on
rGO through one-pot chemical reduction in an ethanol solution at room temperature. The resulting Co–
Ni–W–B alloy self-oxidized in air on the rGO surface. The Co–Ni–W–B–O/rGO composites resembled
three-dimensional flowers with a high surface area; they also exhibited superior electrochemical
performance when compared to most previously reported electrodes based on nickel–cobalt oxides.
Furthermore, the Co–Ni–W–B–O/rGO composite prepared in an ethanol solution showed much higher
Received 8th January 2017
Accepted 21st April 2017
electrochemical performance than the composite prepared in water. The Co–Ni–W–B–O/rGO
electrode showed an ultrahigh specific capacitance of 1189.1 F g1 at 1 A g1 and exhibited a high energy
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta00234c
density of 49.9 W h kg1 along with remarkable cycle stability (10 000 cycles with 80.7% capacitance
rsc.li/materials-a retention at 15 A g1), which is promising for its application in energy storage devices.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 9907–9916 | 9907
View Article Online
specially designed hierarchical nanostructures and doped with a homogeneous solution. Next, 20 mL of a freshly prepared
nanocarbon materials, and they simultaneously serve as NaBH4 solution (10 wt%) was slowly released in droplets to the
building blocks with nanostructures and conductive above mixture under vigorous stirring. Aer 1 h, the black
components.16 sample was collected and washed thoroughly with deionized
Cobalt-based double hydroxides or oxides are important water and then with absolute ethanol. The sample was then
transition-metal-oxide materials for SCs largely because of their dried in air for 24 h at 25 C. During this process, the Co–Ni–W–
Published on 21 April 2017. Downloaded by National Institute of Technology - Rourkela on 3/8/2019 5:30:07 AM.
ultrahigh capacitance.10 Furthermore, cobalt-based oxides are B/rGO sample self-oxidized in air (hereaer referred to as Co–
especially interesting because of their wide availability, cost Ni–W–B–O/rGO). Depending on the amount of GO (in wt%) in
effectiveness, and well-dened electrochemical properties. The the precursor suspension, the prepared samples were named
addition of another transition metal such as Ni could further Co–Ni–W–B–O/10rGO, Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO, Co–Ni–W–B–O/
improve the electrochemical properties owing to the decrease in 30rGO, Co–Ni–W–B–O/40rGO, and Co–Ni–W–B–O/50rGO. For
resistance and increase in oxygen overpotential.16 From comparison, the Co–Ni–W–B/20rGO composite was synthesized
a materials science point of view, the electrochemical perfor- in water, while the Co–B, Co–Ni–B, Co–W–B, and Co–Ni–W–B
mance of a cobalt-based oxide nanostructure depends on its composites were prepared in ethanol solutions under the same
surface area, particles size, crystal structure, and morphology. conditions. Control samples of Co–Ni–B, Co–W–B, and Co–Ni–
Mesoporous nanostructures have been fabricated to develop W–B doped with GO were also prepared under the same
supercapacitor electrodes with high surface areas. However, conditions. These non-oxidized samples were dried under
commonly used preparation methods such as hydrothermal vacuum, and electrodes from these samples were prepared in
methods, solvothermal methods, physical vapor deposition, a glovebox to prevent oxidation.
and electrodeposition are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and To investigate the effect of heat treatment on the electro-
costly.17–21 Surprisingly, we discovered during our study that chemical performance of Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO, the samples
a Co-based ternary alloy prepared in an alcohol solution can be were calcined at 200–500 C in N2 for 2 h.
easily oxidized in air at room temperature. This technique thus
provides an opportunity for the mass production of hybrid 2.2 Characterization of materials
structures of transition-metal oxides and other metal oxides in
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-
a simple and effective manner.
ray (EDX) analysis (S4800, Hitachi, Japan) were used to char-
The chemical reduction of a metal alloy from a precursor
acterize the morphology and surface composition of the
solution is widely used for the preparation of catalysts. Based on
samples at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. Structural analysis
this technique, we devised an approach that combines chemical
was conducted by transmission electron microscopy (TEM;
reduction and self-oxidation to directly grow transition-metal
JEOL 2010, JEOL, Japan) at 300 kV. Powder X-ray diffraction
oxides on a conductive substrate. Since reduced graphene
(XRD) measurements were performed using a diffractometer
oxide (rGO) possesses high conductivity and a high surface area,
(1820, Philips, The Netherlands) with Cu Ka radiation (l ¼
which can suppress volume change during repeated redox
1.5418 Å). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried
reaction processes and particle aggregation, the transition-
out using an XP spectrometer (ESCA 250, Scienta Omicron
metal oxides were doped with rGO. The one-pot synthesis of
GmbH, Germany) equipped with a monochromatic Al Ka
rGO-doped ower-like Co–Ni–W oxides was carried out at room
(1486.6 eV) X-ray source and a hemispherical analyzer. The
temperature. To the best of our knowledge, this kind of nano-
specic surface areas of the composites were measured by N2
structure has not been studied or reported elsewhere. The effect
adsorption at 196 C using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
of graphene content in the composite electrode on its pseudo-
(BET) method (Autosorb iQ2, Quantachrome Instruments,
capacitive behavior was also thoroughly studied to determine
USA). The samples were degassed at 100 C until the vacuum
the optimal content ratio and provide insight into the syner-
pressure was below 104 Pa. The average value was calculated
gistic effect of both rGO and the oxides.22 The Co–Ni–W–B–O/
aer obtaining three measurements for each sample.
rGO composite exhibited a large specic capacitance, high
capability, and excellent cycling properties, which are prom-
ising for practical energy-storage devices such as portable 2.3 Electrochemical measurements
electronic devices and hybrid electric vehicles. Test electrodes for electrochemical capacitors were prepared by
mixing 8 mg of each synthesized sample with 1 mg carbon black
2. Experimental section and 1 mg polyvinylidene uoride (as the binder) to form
a slurry. Next, 100 mL of ethanol was added to each mixture in an
2.1 Synthesis agate mortar to make it homogeneous. The slurries were coated
All chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further onto 1 1 cm2 nickel-foam current collectors using a blade,
purication. In a typical preparation process, 6 mmol of cobalt and the resulting electrodes were dried at 60 C under vacuum
nitrate hexahydrate (Co(NO3)2$6H2O), 3 mmol of nickel nitrate for 6 h. All the electrochemical experiments were carried out
hexahydrate (Ni(NO3)2$6H2O), 3 mmol of sodium tungstate using a conventional three-electrode system. The as-prepared
dihydrate (Na2WO4$2H2O), and 20 mg (or 10, 30, 40, 50 mg) of electrode acted as the working electrode. A platinum electrode
graphene oxide (GO) were rst added to 60 mL of absolute and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) were used as the
ethanol, and the solution was stirred for over 24 h to form counter and reference electrodes, respectively.
9908 | J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 9907–9916 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
View Article Online
To construct an asymmetric supercapacitor, Co–Ni–W–B–O/ was clearly observed that the color of the powder changed from
20rGO was used as the positive electrode and rGO was used as dark black to grey aer self-oxidation in air. However, the binary
the negative electrode. The electrolyte was a 6 M KOH solution. alloy Co–B and the ternary alloys Co–Ni–B and Co–W–B were
All the experiments were performed at room temperature (25 still black aer 24 h of exposure to air at room temperature,
1 C). indicating that they were not oxidized at all or not thoroughly
Cyclic voltammetry (CV), electrochemical impedance spec- oxidized. This was probably because the synergistic effect
Published on 21 April 2017. Downloaded by National Institute of Technology - Rourkela on 3/8/2019 5:30:07 AM.
troscopy (EIS) and galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) tests between rGO and elemental Co, Ni, and W enhanced the activity
were performed using an electrochemical workstation (IM6e, of the alloys, allowing them to easily oxidize in air. A widely used
Zahner-Elektrik, Germany). The EIS spectra were recorded at an method to enhance the activity of the Co–B alloy is to introduce
open-circuit potential with an amplitude of 10 mV over the other transition metals. The combination of several transition
frequency range from 10 kHz to 100 mHz. The average specic metals can create a synergistic effect to enhance the catalytic
capacitances were calculated from the CV curves and discharge performance of the transition-metal alloy. The dopant elements
curves according to eqn (1) and (2), respectively:23 mostly change the electronic states of the active metal and vary
ð the atomic distance and coordination number to affect the
1
Cs ¼ iðV ÞdV ; (1) catalytic performance. In the case of Co–B, by sharing electrons,
2mvDV
Co becomes a more active center than when it is used alone. An
IDt efficient route to avoid the agglomeration of Co–B particles is to
Cs ¼ ; (2)
mDV introduce an atomic diffusion barrier between them in the form
of transition metals like Ni, Mo, and W. These promoter metals,
where Cs (F g1) is the specic capacitance, m (g) is the mass of
mainly in the form of oxides, are very efficient, and even a small
active materials in the electrode, v (V s1) is the scan rate, DV is
atomic concentration can signicantly increase the surface area
the potential window, i (V) is the instantaneous current on the
of the Co–B catalyst powder by avoiding agglomeration.27
CV curve, I (A) is the discharge current, and Dt (s) is the
Therefore, the more active the alloy, the more easily it can react
discharge time.
with oxygen and form multiple metal oxides.
The energy density (E) and power density (P) were calculated
XRD and FTIR measurements were performed to learn more
according to eqn (3) and (4), respectively:24
about the synthesized products. Powder XRD is a reliable
1 technique for determining the crystal structure of materials. As
E¼ Cs ðDV Þ2 ; (3)
2 shown in Fig. 2a, no distinct peaks were observed in the XRD
patterns of the Co–Ni–W–B–O alloy and the Co–Ni–W–O/20rGO
E
P¼ ; (4) composite, indicating that they were basically amorphous. For
Dt
the XRD pattern of GO, the peak at 2q ¼ 10 corresponds to the
where E is in units of W h kg1 and P is in units of W kg1. interlayer spacing of 8.6 Å dened by the (002) peak. However,
the peak is absent in the XRD pattern of rGO owing to the
reduction of GO by NaBH4, and it is also absent in the XRD
3. Results and discussion pattern of Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO, thus conrming that GO was
3.1 Material synthesis completely reduced to rGO by NaBH4.28
Transition-metal oxides can be synthesized by various routes FTIR spectra were recorded and examined to conrm the
such as solvothermal, electrodeposition, sol–gel, and physical composition of Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO. As shown in Fig. 2b, the
vapor deposition methods. In our study, we adapted the method bands located at 3410 and 3450 cm1 are attributed to the O–H
of direct room-temperature chemical reduction, a fast synthesis bond in H2O on the surface of the samples. Meanwhile, the
technique that yields bulk quantities of transition-metal oxides. peak at 1100 cm1 corresponds to the dissolution of CO2 from
Transition-metal oxides were previously fabricated by Li et al. air. The bands in the low wavenumber region (400–900 cm1)
and Yang et al., who used the solvothermal method, but not the correspond to the stretching vibrations of the Ni–O, Co–O, and
direct room-temperature mixing approach.25,26 The Co–Ni–W–B W–O bonds. The bands at around 440 and 550 cm1 and those
alloy in our study self-oxidized on the surface of rGO in air at
room temperature. The three-dimensional (3D) nanostructure
of the samples was well preserved aer oxidation. The process
of preparation of Co–Ni–W–B–O/rGO is illustrated in Fig. 1. It
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 9907–9916 | 9909
View Article Online
around 600 and 640 cm1 are typical of Ni–O and Co–O results also revealed that Co, Ni, W, B, O, and C were uniformly
stretching vibrations, respectively, while the band at 820 cm1 distributed throughout the entire composite (Fig. S1†). The TEM
corresponds to the W–O bond. These results indicate that the image in Fig. 3f shows that Co–Ni–W–B–O was well anchored on
elements Co, Ni, and W were oxidized in the composite. the surface of rGO. It also proves that the products consisted of
Furthermore, because of the amorphous structure and surface interconnected ower-like 3D nanosheets. The diameter of the
defects, the absorption bands of the metal–oxygen bond are ower was about 200 nm. In the corresponding selected-area
Published on 21 April 2017. Downloaded by National Institute of Technology - Rourkela on 3/8/2019 5:30:07 AM.
shied and broadened when compared with those of the crys- electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (inset of Fig. 3f), a broad and
talline phase reported in the literature.23,29–31 diffuse halo ring can be seen, suggesting that the Co–Ni–W–B–O/
rGO sample consisted of an amorphous phase, which is in
3.2 Composition and morphology of the synthesized Co–Ni– agreement with the XRD results.
W–B–O/rGO composites XPS analysis provided more detailed information on the
The composition and morphology of the samples were further chemical composition of the as-prepared nanocomposites. The
investigated by SEM and TEM. Fig. 3 shows the typical SEM and full spectrum in Fig. 4a shows that Co (14.03 at%), Ni (8.1
TEM images of the as-prepared samples. Thick nanoakes of at%), W (0.66 at%), O (54.4 at%), C (12.71 at%), and B (10.1 at%)
the pure Co–Ni–W–B–O alloy were formed (Fig. 3a and b), were present in the Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO sample. To conrm
whereas the Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO sample displayed more that O did not originate from rGO alone, the full XPS spectrum
ower-like and dispersive features, which indicate that rGO of rGO was also recorded (Fig. S2†). The atomic ratio of C/O was
effectively decreased the agglomeration and reduced the 1.75 in the rGO, which indicates that O in Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO
thickness of the Co–Ni–W–B–O nanoakes (Fig. 3c and d). The mainly originated from the metal oxides. To further understand
Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO sample exhibited a special hierarchical the electronic states of the elements, we paid more attention to
porous structure composed of vast nanosheets; the pores were the higher-resolution spectra.
formed as a result of the release of abundant H2 during The high-resolution Co 2p XPS spectrum in Fig. 4b shows
reduction. The nanosheets gathered to form the porous struc- two main peaks with binding energies of 780.7 eV (Co 2p3/2) and
ture, which provided the products with a high specic surface 796.7 eV (Co 2p1/2), with an energy separation of 6 eV, which is
area and a large pore volume. characteristic of the Co3O4 phase.32 The satellite peaks are
EDX analysis (Fig. 3e) indicated that the Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO located about 6 eV above the main peaks. The complex Co 2p
nanoparticles consisted of 16.9 wt% Co, 9.3 wt% Ni, 3.9 wt% W, spectrum indicates the presence of two chemically distinct
48.7 wt% O, 18.4 wt% C, and 2.8 wt% B. While B originated from species, Co2+ and Co3+.31 Similar results were also observed in
the reducing agent, NaBH4, the high O content indicates that the
surface of the sample was thoroughly oxidized. The EDX mapping
Fig. 3SEM images of (a and b) Co–Ni–W–B–O and (c and d) Co–Ni– Fig. 4 (a) Full XPS spectrum of Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO. Sections of
W–B–O/20rGO. (e) EDX spectrum of Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO. (f) TEM the XPS spectrum corresponding to various electronic states: (b) Co
image of Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO. 2p; (c) Ni 2p; (d) W 4f; (e) O 1s; and (f) C 1s.
9910 | J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 9907–9916 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
View Article Online
the Ni 2p spectrum (Fig. 4c): two spin–orbit doublets at 873.5 3.4 Electrochemical properties of the Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO
and 855.7 eV corresponding to Ni 2p1/2 and Ni 2p3/2, respec- electrodes
tively; two obvious satellite peaks located at 880.1 and
Next, the electrochemical properties of the samples were
861.6 eV,33,34 which are assigned to species containing Ni2+ and
investigated to evaluate their applicability as active materials in
Ni3+ ions, respectively. The valence states of W atoms can be
supercapacitors. A three-electrode cell with an SCE reference
obtained by deconvolving the W 4f core-level spectrum (Fig. 4d)
Published on 21 April 2017. Downloaded by National Institute of Technology - Rourkela on 3/8/2019 5:30:07 AM.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 9907–9916 | 9911
View Article Online
CoOOH + OH ¼ CoO2 + H2O + e, (6) in the following order: Ni–W–B/rGO < Co–W–B/rGO < Co–Ni–B/
rGO < Co–Ni–W–B/rGO < Co–Ni–W–B–O/rGO. These results
Ni3O4 + OH + H2O ¼ 3NiOOH + e, (7) further conrm the successful introduction of transition
elements, which are known to effectively improve the surface
NiOOH + H2O + e ¼ Ni(OH)2 + OH, (8) area and decrease the resistance of the alloy.27
The specic capacitance of Co–Ni–W–B–O/rGO was found to
Published on 21 April 2017. Downloaded by National Institute of Technology - Rourkela on 3/8/2019 5:30:07 AM.
9912 | J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 9907–9916 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
View Article Online
To further investigate the electrochemical performance of 15 A g1. Using eqn (2), the specic capacitance was calculated
Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO calcined at different temperatures (200– to be 1189.1, 1098.2, 923.6, 827.3, 759.2, and 668.1 F g1 at
500 C), we compared the XRD patterns of these samples a discharge current density of 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, and 15 A g1,
(shown in Fig. S8†). Obviously, all of the patterns showed respectively. As expected, the specic capacitance decreased
weakening diffraction peaks as all the samples gradually when the current density increased (Fig. 7c).
formed a crystalline state with increasing temperature. Fig. 6f In general, the capacitance degrades more severely at
Published on 21 April 2017. Downloaded by National Institute of Technology - Rourkela on 3/8/2019 5:30:07 AM.
displays the GCD curves of ve samples at 1 A g1. As shown by a higher charge/discharge current, which is largely due to the
the discharge time, the specic capacitance decreased stepwise voltage drop commonly reported in many studies.23,33 The
with increasing calcination temperature. These results indicate electrochemical performance of the Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO
that the Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO sample with an amorphous electrode is compared with those of previously reported elec-
structure exhibited superior electrochemical performance when trodes in Table 1.
compared to the crystalline samples. The specic capacitance of Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO is consid-
Fig. 7a shows representative CV curves, obtained at different erably larger than those of most of the materials based on
scan rates, of Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO prepared in ethanol by transition-metal oxides. Fig. 7d shows the Ragone plot (power
chemical reduction. The oxidation peaks shied toward higher density versus energy density) derived from the charge–
potentials and the reduction peaks shied toward lower discharge curves of the Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO electrode. The
potentials with a large potential separation when the scan rate synergistic effect of the ower-like Co–Ni–W–B–O 3D nano-
was increased. However, the shapes of these CV curves particles and graphene sheets can be clearly seen. The Co–Ni–
remained unchanged when the scan rate was increased from 10 W–B–O electrodes delivered a high energy density of 49.9 W h
to 100 mV s1, indicating the good capacitive behavior and the kg1 at a power density of 256.7 W kg1, and an energy density
high-rate capability of Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO. Fig. 7b presents of 28.1 W h kg1 at a high power density of 18 100 W kg1.
the galvanostatic charge–discharge curves in the potential range Charge–discharge cycling was also carried out to investigate
from 0.2 to 0.35 V at different current densities between 1 and the electrochemical stability of the as-fabricated Co–Ni–W–B–O/
20rGO electrode in a concentrated alkaline electrolyte. The
results are shown in Fig. 7e. The test was performed for 10 000
cycles in 6 M KOH at a high discharge current of 15 A g1 in the
potential window between 0.2 and 0.35 V. The Co–Ni–W–B–O/
20rGO electrode demonstrated remarkable cycling stability. The
overall capacitance retention dropped slightly and retained
80.7% of the original value even aer 10 000 cycles. Further-
more, the EIS results indicate that the electrochemical resis-
tance of the electrode only slightly increased aer 10 000 cycles
(Fig. 7f). The calculated charge-transfer resistance of the Co–Ni–
W–B–O/20rGO electrode before and aer the cycling was 3.8
and 5.1 U, respectively, indicating its good stability. This
phenomenon was expected owing to the high conductivity of
graphene, and the addition of graphene into the 3D nano-
structure would certainly signicantly improve charge transfer.
The direct adhesion of Co–Ni–W–B–O on the graphene sheet
enabled fast electron transport, which in turn improved its
pseudocapacitive behavior.22 These results strongly demon-
strate that the interaction between graphene and Co–Ni–W–B–
O, and the chemical stability and mechanical exibility of gra-
phene sheets provided a suitable substrate for the nucleation of
Co–Ni–W–B–O and prevented the agglomeration of the
nanoparticles.
To investigate the potential application of the Co–Ni–W–B–
O/20rGO nanocomposite, we further constructed an asym-
metric supercapacitor by pairing the Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO
Fig. 7 (a) CV curves of Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO at various scan rates.
(b) Charge–discharge curves of the Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO electrode positive electrode with an rGO negative electrode (denoted as
at current densities between 1 and 15 A g1. (c) Dependence of specific Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO//rGO). The mass between the positive
capacitance values on the current density. (d) Ragone plot (power and negative electrodes was determined according to the well-
density versus energy density) of the Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO elec- known charge balance equation (Q+ ¼ Q). Q is equal to C
trode, derived from the charge–discharge curves at different current
DV m. The optimal mass ratio between the Co–Ni–W–B–O/
densities. (e) Cycle life of the Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO electrode at
a current density of 15 A g1; the electrode was operated for 10 000 20rGO and rGO electrodes is estimated to be m+/m ¼ 0.38
cycles. (f) Electrochemical impedance spectra of the Co–Ni–W–B–O/ from the CV curves (Fig. S9†) according to eqn (10):56
20rGO electrode before and after 10 000 cycles.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 9907–9916 | 9913
View Article Online
Table 1 Comparison of the electrochemical performance of the Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO electrode with performances of previously reported
electrodes
Electrode materials Current density (A g1) Specic capacitance (F g1) Electrolyte Ref.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their gratitude and appreciation to
the National Science Foundation of China (51561006, 51461011,
51461010, 51401059, 51361005, 51371060, and U1501242), the
Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2016GXNSFFA380012,
2014GXNSFBA118240, 2015GXNSFBA139208, and
Fig. 8Ragone plot of the Co–Ni–W–B–O/20rGO//rGO device 2014GXNSFAA118318), and the Innovation Project of GUET
compared with those in the literature. Graduate Education (2016YJCX23).
9914 | J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 9907–9916 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
View Article Online
3 Z. Zhu, Y. Hu, H. Jiang and C. Li, J. Power Sources, 2014, 246, 1429–1464.
402–408. 28 D. B. Mascagni, C. M. Miyazaki, N. C. da Cruz, M. L. de
4 Y. F. Tang, T. Chen, S. X. Yu, Y. Q. Qiao, S. C. Mu, Moraes, A. Riul Jr and M. Ferreira, Mater. Sci. Eng., C,
S. H. Zhang, Y. F. Zhao, L. Hou, W. W. Huang and 2016, 68, 739–745.
F. M. Gao, J. Power Sources, 2015, 295, 314–322. 29 R. Vijayalakshmi, M. Jayachandran and C. Sanjeeviraja, Curr.
5 Q. Wang, Y. Zou, C. Xiang, H. Chu, H. Zhang, F. Xu, L. Sun Appl. Phys., 2003, 3, 171–175.
and C. Tang, Ceram. Int., 2016, 42, 12129–12135. 30 X. Sun, G. K. Wang, H. T. Sun, F. Y. Lu, M. P. Yu and J. Lian, J.
6 P. C. Banerjee, D. E. Lobo, R. Middag, W. K. Ng, Power Sources, 2013, 238, 150–156.
M. E. Shaibani and M. Majumder, ACS Appl. Mater. 31 J. M. Luo, B. Gao and X. G. Zhang, Mater. Res. Bull., 2008, 43,
Interfaces, 2015, 7, 3655–3664. 1119–1125.
7 G. Binitha, M. S. Soumya, A. A. Madhavan, P. Praveen, 32 Y. Zou, I. A. Kinloch and R. A. Dryfe, ACS Appl. Mater.
A. Balakrishnan, K. R. V. Subramanian, M. V. Reddy, Interfaces, 2015, 7, 22831–22838.
S. V. Nair, A. S. Nair and N. Sivakumar, J. Mater. Chem. A, 33 V. Veeramani, R. Madhu, S.-M. Chen and M. Sivakumar, ACS
2013, 1, 11698–11704. Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2016, 4, 5013–5020.
8 Y. Li, H. Xie, J. Wang and L. Chen, Mater. Lett., 2011, 65, 403– 34 M. Yang, H. Cheng, Y. Gu, Z. Sun, J. Hu, L. Cao, F. Lv, M. Li,
405. W. Wang, Z. Wang, S. Wu, H. Liu and Z. Lu, Nano Res., 2015,
9 J. W. Lee, T. Ahn, J. H. Kim, J. M. Ko and J. D. Kim, 8, 2744–2754.
Electrochim. Acta, 2011, 56, 4849–4857. 35 S. Cong, Y. Tian, Q. Li, Z. Zhao and F. Geng, Adv. Mater.,
10 K. Qiu, H. Yan, D. Zhang, Y. Lu, J. Cheng, W. Zhao, C. Wang, 2014, 26, 4260–4267.
Y. Zhang, X. Liu, C. Cheng and Y. Luo, Electrochim. Acta, 36 U. M. Patil, J. S. Sohn, S. B. Kulkarni, S. C. Lee, H. G. Park,
2014, 141, 248–254. K. V. Gurav, J. H. Kim and S. C. Jun, ACS Appl. Mater.
11 Y. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, Z. Wang, H. Fu, X. Zhang, Y. Chen, Interfaces, 2014, 6, 2450–2458.
H. Zhang and X. Li, Electrochim. Acta, 2014, 145, 177–184. 37 U. B. Demirci and P. Miele, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014,
12 R. Kumar, H.-J. Kim, S. Park, A. Srivastava and I. K. Oh, 16, 6872–6885.
Carbon, 2014, 79, 192–202. 38 R. Kumar, R. K. Singh, P. K. Dubey, D. P. Singh and
13 R. Kumar, R. K. Singh, A. R. Vaz and S. A. Moshkalev, RSC R. M. Yadav, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 15042–
Adv., 2015, 5, 67988–67995. 15051.
14 T. Li, G. H. Li, L. H. Li, L. Liu, Y. Xu, H. Y. Ding and T. Zhang, 39 C. Yin, C. Yang, M. Jiang, C. Deng, L. Yang, J. Li and D. Qian,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 2562–2572. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 2741–2752.
15 Y. Zuo, J. J. Ni, J. M. Song, H. L. Niu, C. J. Mao, S. Y. Zhang 40 X. S. Yin, C. H. Tang, L. Y. Zhang, Z. G. Yu and H. Gong, Sci.
and Y. H. Shen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 370, 528–535. Rep., 2016, 6, 21566.
16 H. N. Ma, J. He, D. B. Xiong, J. S. Wu, Q. Q. Li, V. Dravid and 41 Y. Li, L. Cao, L. Qiao, M. Zhou, Y. Yang, P. Xiao and Y. Zhang,
Y. F. Zhao, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 1992–2000. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 6540–6548.
17 H. Chen, L. Hu, M. Chen, Y. Yan and L. Wu, Adv. Funct. 42 L. Wen, X. Qin, W. Meng, N. Cao and Z. Song, Mater. Sci.
Mater., 2014, 24, 934–942. Eng., B, 2016, 23, 63–68.
18 G. Liu, B. Wang, L. Wang, Y. Yuan and D. Wang, RSC Adv., 43 Y. Zheng, Z. Li, J. Xu, T. Wang, X. Liu, X. Duan, Y. Ma,
2016, 6, 7129–7138. Y. Zhou and C. Pei, Nano Energy, 2016, 20, 94–107.
19 L. Niu, J. Wang, W. Hong, J. Sun, Z. Fan, X. Ye, H. Wang and 44 M. Yang, F. Lv, Z. Wang, Y. Xiong, M. Li, W. Wang, L. Zhang,
S. Yang, Electrochim. Acta, 2014, 123, 560–568. S. Wu, H. Liu, Y. Gu and Z. Lu, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 31725–
20 P. Cao, L. Wang, Y. Xu, Y. Fu and X. Ma, Electrochim. Acta, 31731.
2015, 157, 359–368. 45 N. M. Shinde, A. D. Jagadale, V. S. Kumbhar, T. R. Rana,
21 W. Yang, Z. Gao, J. Ma, J. Wang, X. Zhang and L. Liu, Dalton J. Kim and C. D. Lokhande, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 2015, 32,
Trans., 2013, 42, 15706–15715. 974–979.
22 D. T. Dam, X. Wang and J. M. Lee, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 46 G. Xiong, P. He, L. Liu, T. Chen and T. S. Fisher, J. Mater.
2014, 6, 8246–8256. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 22940–22948.
23 C. Long, M. Zheng, Y. Xiao, B. Lei, H. Dong, H. Zhang, H. Hu 47 C. Xiang, J. Cheng, Z. She, Y. Zou, H. Chu, S. Qiu, H. Zhang,
and Y. Liu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 24419–24429. L. Sun and F. Xu, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 163–166.
24 Y. M. Wang, X. Zhang, C. Y. Guo, Y. Q. Zhao, C. L. Xu and 48 X. Xu, Y. Yang, M. Wang, P. Dong, R. Baines, J. Shen and
H. L. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 13290–13300. M. Ye, Ceram. Int., 2016, 42, 10719–10725.
49 X. Xia, J. Tu, Y. Mai, R. Chen, X. Wang, C. Gu and X. Zhao,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 10898–10905.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 9907–9916 | 9915
View Article Online
50 L. Xie, F. Su, L. Xie, X. Li, Z. Liu, Q. Kong, X. Guo, Y. Zhang, 56 L. Gao, J. U. Surjadi, K. Cao, H. Zhang, P. Li, S. Xu, C. Jiang,
L. Wan, K. Li, C. Lv and C. Chen, Chemsuschem, 2015, 8, J. Song, D. Sun and Y. Lu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9,
2917–2926. 5409–5418.
51 L. Ma, X. Zhou, L. Xu, X. Xu, L. Zhang, C. Ye, J. Luo and 57 X. Wang, W. Liu, X. Lu and P. S. Lee, J. Mater. Chem., 2012,
W. Chen, Colloids Surf., A, 2015, 481, 609–615. 22, 23114–23119.
52 C. Lamiel, V. H. Nguyen, C. Roh, C. Kang and J. J. Shim, 58 J. Xiao and S. Yang, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 12253–12262.
Published on 21 April 2017. Downloaded by National Institute of Technology - Rourkela on 3/8/2019 5:30:07 AM.
Electrochim. Acta, 2016, 210, 240–250. 59 K. Xu, R. Zou, W. Li, Q. Liu, X. Liu, L. An and J. Hu, J. Mater.
53 Y. Liang, Y. Yang and Z. Hu, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 2016, 11, Chem. A, 2014, 2, 10090–10097.
4092–4109. 60 X. Wang, J. Liu, Y. Wang, C. Zhao and W. Zheng, Mater. Res.
54 C. Ge, Z. Hou, B. He, F. Zeng, J. Cao, Y. Liu and Y. Kuang, J. Bull., 2014, 52, 89–95.
Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 2012, 63, 146–152. 61 J. Ji, L. Zhang, H. Ji, Y. Li, X. Zhao, X. Bai, X. Fan, F. Zhang
55 C. Yu, Y. Wang, J. Zhang, X. Shu, J. Cui, Y. Qin, H. Zheng, and R. S. Ruoff, ACS Nano, 2013, 7, 6237–6243.
J. Liu, Y. Zhang and Y. Wu, New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 6881– 62 R. Ding, L. Qi, M. Jia and H. Wang, Electrochim. Acta, 2013,
6889. 107, 494–502.
9916 | J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 9907–9916 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017