Fish Diseases
Fish Diseases
Main body
According to the data collected during the last five years in Poland, health
disorders caused by Aeromonas species were mostly observed in carp (Cyprinus
carpio L.) and were usually manifested by skin lesions (MAI) in the form of
ulceration (Fig. 1). Fish mortalities were also observed (26, data not published).
Co-infections with other microorganisms like Pseudomonas spp.
Fig. 1
Pseudomonas infections. Pseudomonas spp. are widespread in the
environment, forming a very large group of microorganisms. These
psychrophilic bacteria develop well at low temperatures and are the dominant
microflora. At higher temperatures (above 10ºC), they are quickly replaced by
competing, mesophilic microorganisms, including bacteria of the
genus Aeromonas.
P. fluorescens is the most important species in fish pathology and is very often
associated with skin (Fig. 2) and fin disease. In some trout farms, throughout the
year regardless of the water temperature, infections with P. fluorescens can
cause sudden mortality, reaching even 100% of the rainbow trout population
(data not published). Such a rapid disease course may be the effect of mutations,
resulting in the appearance of a new property allowing the bacteria to adapt to
new environmental conditions.
Fig. 2
Other Pseudomonas (P. putida or P. luteola) are often isolated from internal
organs of fish; however, these species are mostly an accompanying microflora
(23). Pseudomonas spp. can cause strawberry disease in rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum, 1792) (Fig. 3) and tench (Tinca tinca).
Similar systemic infections with typical symptoms of septicaemia were also
observed in crucian carp (Carassius carassius) and silver carp (Carassius
gibelio) (1, 9, 23).
Fig. 3
Strawberry disease/infection with Pseudomonas spp. in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus
mykiss, Walbaum, 1792) (photo: A. Kozińska, A. Pękala-Safińska)
Relatively often during the last ten years, Flavobacterium spp. have been
isolated from salmonids and cyprinids on Polish farms where clinical symptoms
of the disease were observed in the fish (25) (Figs 4 and and5).5). The first
documented outbreak of CWD in Poland was found in rainbow trout (4).
Fig. 4
Flavobacterium infection in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum, 1792)
(photo: A. Kozińska, A. Pękala-Safińska)
Fig. 5
Rainbow trout fry infected with Flavobacterium psychrophilum (photo: A. Pękala-
Safińska)
Fig. 6
Infection with Acinetobacter spp. in carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) (photo: A. Pękala-Safińska)
Infection with Acinetobacter spp. in most cases is mixed with other bacterial
infection, mainly from the genus Aeromonas or Chryseobacterium spp.;
however, the dominant flora in bacteriological examinations belonged to the
genus Acinetobacter. It is worth noting that Acinetobacter spp. are generally
regarded as carriers of antimicrobial resistance genes. Therefore, they can be
very important in the spread of drug resistance in the environment (29).
Shewanella putrefaciens infections. For over 10 years, shewanelloses have
been serious diseases of freshwater cultured fish. The aetiological
agent, Shewanella putrefaciens, is a halophilic bacterium and very well known
as an important microorganism of the food spoilage process. It mainly putrefies
fish stored at low temperatures, but also poultry meat and beef products (6, 15).
This bacterium has also been isolated from marine and brackish waters, as well
as from marine fish (2). The first bacterium isolations from diseased freshwater
fish were described by Kozińska and Pękala (24). Infection rapidly spread and
health disorders were noticed among different fish species, both cultured and
ornamental: common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus
mykiss, Walbaum, 1792), European eel (Anguilla anguilla), brown trout (Salmo
trutta m. trutta), silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix), European whitefish
(Coregonus lavaretus), sander (Sander lucioperca), ide (Leuciscus idus),
common roach (Rutilus rutilus), zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio), slender krib
(Pelvicachromis taeniatus), least killifish (Heterandria formosa), and koi carp
(Cyprinus carpio L.) (36, 37).
Health disorders in cultured fish were noted mainly in spring, when water
temperature rose to 7ºC–10ºC (34). Clinical signs, prevalently lethargy,
darkening of the skin, skin lesions, and ulceration, have been observed in
infected fish (Fig. 7). In post-mortem examination haemorrhage in the kidneys
and spleen was noticed. The range of mortality varied from 40% to 85% in
different fish species (34, 36).
Fig. 7
Shewanella putrefaciens infection in carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) (photo: A. Kozińska, A.
Pękala-Safińska)
The clinical symptoms of L. garviae and Str. iniae infections are usually similar
and vary only slightly, depending on the fish species. In both infections, a
typical clinical sign is exophthalmia. Furthermore, darkening of the skin, anal
oedema, petechiae in the eyes, on the gill covers, and at the base of the fins are
observed. Anatomopathological examination showed haemorrhages in the swim
bladder, liver, spleen, and kidney, as well as stomach inflammation. During the
process of disease development, the initial phase of infection is very
characteristic. Then, fish exhibit nervous whirling rapid movements from the
bottom to the surface or in the opposite direction, resulting from meningitis or
encephalitis (12, 13).
Conclusion
Bacterial coinfections are often recorded in wild and farmed fish when more
than one bacterial pathogens coinfect fish. In Egypt, mixed infections may lay
behind the different clinical signs and are responsible for difficulties in
diagnosis and control régimes in closed aquatic environments. Therefore,
dependence on traditional methods only for diagnosis may mask the identity of
real causes.
On the other hand, molecular methods have improved the ability to identify
bacterial pathogens. The whole-genome sequencing of microorganisms has
made significant progress in understanding their biology and makes it possible
to increase the specificity, sensitivity, and speed of diagnosis by using these
nucleic acid techniques. These techniques also provide a way to examine the
connections between the genotype and phenotype of different micro-agents.
These advanced techniques may support epidemiological investigations and
help to pinpoint the origins of illness outbreaks or the existence of infections.
Therefore, these genetic technologies can be used frequently in the quest for
better ways to identify and manage fish infections and understand the spread of
infectious diseases in fish. Unfortunately, there are few diagnostic wet
laboratories in Egypt that use these techniques regularly. In addition, there are
several problems to be fixed before using these tests in aquatic laboratories,
such as the availability of specific equipment, cost-effectiveness for regular
operation, personnel training, accuracy, and reproducibility. Currently, PCR-
based techniques are widely used; however, alternative technologies needed to
be implanted in laboratories in the coming years as sequencing devices.
Therefore, this review shed the light on the importance of popular molecular
tools in the thrust of identification of bacterial pathogens in farmed fish.
References