Block 4
Block 4
W 1lE PEDPl.E'S
UlLUUIT
Indira Gandhi
MCFT-004
Counselling and Family Therapy:
National Open University
National Centre of DisabiIiy Studies Applied Aspects
~I \iR1 ~ ~ CflI(On ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ "OOffiT ~ I"
Block
4
PROCESSES OF COUNSELLING AND
FAMILY THERAPY
UNIT 15
Referral and Intake 5
UNIT 16
Initial Phase 20
UNIT 17
Middle Phase 31
UNIT 18
Termination Phase: End Processes 45
EXPERT COMMITTEE
Prof. V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai (Chairperson)
Vice Chancellor
IGNOU, New Delhi
Dr. Jayanti Dutta Ms. Reena Nath Dr. Rekha Sharma Sen
Associate Professor of HDCS, Practising Family Therapist Associate Professor
Lady Irwin College, New Delhi New Delhi (Child Development), SOCE
IGNOU, New Delhi
Prof. Vibha Joshi Prof. c.R.K. Murthy Mr. Sangmeshwar Rao
Director, School of Education STRIDE Producer, EMPC, IGNOU
IGNOU, New Delhi IGNOU, New Delhi New Delhi
Acknowledgment:
We acknowledge our thanks to Prof. Omprakash Mishra, Former PVC, IGNOU; Prof. e.G. Naidu, Former Director (I/c)
P&DD and Head, Nodal Unit; Dr. Hemlata, Former Director (l/c) NCDS; and Dr. Arun Banik, Director, NCDS, for facilitating
the development of the programme of study.
COURSE WRITERS
Unit 15 Dr. Bino Thomas, Junior Consultant, Dept. of Psychiatric Social
Work, NIMHANS, Bangalore
BLOCK EDITORS
Prof. Anisha Shah Prof. Neerja Chadha
Department of Mental Health and Professor of Child Development
Social Psychology, NIMHANS, SOCE, IGNOU, New Delhi
Bangalore
Dr. Amiteshwar Ratra
Research Officer,
NCDS, IGNOU, New Delhi
Acknowledgment:
We express our thanks to all those whose photo images have been used on the
cover page.
January.Ztrl l
ISBN: 978-81-266-5227-3
.All rights reserved. No pan of this work may be reproduced in any form, by mimeograph or
any other means, without permission in writing from the Indira Gandhi National Open University,
New Delhi.
Further information on Indira Gandhi National Open University courses may be obtained
from the University's office at Maidan Garhi, New Delhi- 110 068 or the official website of
IGNOU at www.ignou.ac.in.
Printed and published on behalf of Indira Gandhi National Open University by Registrar,
MPDD.
Laser Composed by: Rajshree Computers, V-166A, Bhagwati Vihar, (Near Sector-2, Dwarka),
Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-ll0059
Printed by: Kalyan Enterprises, D-20,Sec.B-3, Tronica City (lnde.Area) Loni,G.Z.B.(U.P.)
BLOCK 4 PROCESSES OF COUNSELLING
AND FAMILY THERAPY
Introduction
The Block 4 "Processes of Counselling and Family Therapy" will acquaint you
with the knowledge of various phases of counselling and family therapy. The Block
consists of four units.
The Unit 15 is entitled "Referral and Intake". As the name suggests the Unit describes
the referral and intake process in counselling and family therapy. The Unit is divided
into two parts. The first part of the Unit explains the referral process which includes
the meaning of referral, who refers and to whom. This part helps, you to understand
how referral helps in family therapy and also describes the various reasons of non- .
attendance of session. The later part of the Unit deals with the intake process. It
includes various resistance to the family concept, environmental settings, observations
and therapeutic planning and the contact. Further, the Unit also explains the important
things to remember while conducting intake. In the end of this Unit, the role of the
counsellor and family therapist in referral and intake process is described.
The Unit 16 is on "Initial Phase". The Unit begins with the main theme of initial phase
and important assumptions of initial phase. Further, the Unit acquaints you with the
knowledge of assessment process in initial phase, which includes, initial contact,
defining the goals for the initial phase and family history and genograms. In the end
of this Unit, structural family system rating scale is explained in detail. The main
aspects included in this scale are family structure, resonance, flexibility, developmental
stage of family, identified patienthood, conflict resolution, common techniques,
developing a family formulation, feedback and recommendations to the family and
arranging the next step.
Unit 17 is "Middle Phase". The Unit aquaints you with the knowledge of middle
phase of family therapy. It begins with the main goals of middle phase of counselling
and family therapy. The family therapy goals should have joint creation and agreement
on goals. Clarity of goals to family members as well as family therapist is very
important. There are two types of goals, that are, short-term and long-term goals.
Further, the Unit discusses the various challenges to establishing goals in family
therapy. The Unit illustrates the middle phase' processes with the help of a case, In
the end of the Unit, various challenges to family therapy are explained, with particular
focus on therapist neutrality and family resistance.
Unit 18 is entitled ''Termination Phase: End Processes". Termination phase is the last
phase of family therapy and this Unit acquaints you with the processes involved in
this phase. The Unit begins with the introduction of termination phase and its types.
Further, the Unit highlights the indicators for planned termination. The various steps
included in termination process like, information regarding planning of termination,
summarise hypothesis, goals and what happened in therapy, examine changes,
anticipate problems, reinforcement and hope biulding and plans for. follow-up are
explained. The two important issues - termination anxiety and resurgence of problem
are also discussed. While going through the Unit, you can understand various therapist
and client related factors that lead to unplanned termination. In the end of this Unit,
you will learn to deal with termination both planned and unplanned.
UNIT 15 REFERRAL AND INTAKE
Structure
15.1 Introduction
15.6 Non-attendance
15.1 INTRODUCTION
The present Unit deals with the referral and intake processes in Counselling
and Family Therapy. The Unit begins with introduction of referral. Further, it
states the persons who normally -refer (send) the client or patient to the
counsellor or therapist. You will understand the reason of referring client or
patient to other related professionals and how this process takes place. The
second part of this Unit deals with intake process. It describes the meaning
and process of intake. There are some important points that a counsellor or
therapist should keep in mind with repard to the intake process. We will
discuss these points in detail in this Unit.
Objectives
After studying this Unit, you will be able to:
• Define referral and intake process;
• Understand importance and procedure of referral and intake process;
and
• Understand the role of therapist or counsellor in intake process.
5
Processes. of Counselling and
Family Therapy 15.2 MEANING OF REFERRAL
. Referral usually is the process in which a client is sent for seeking a higher
level intervention or opinion. In general, a lot of patients are sent from primary
care centres to tertiary care centres for availing services. In the same way,
couples or families who seek help in harmonising the relationship or bringing
change in their life are sent to specialists who are experts in handling relationship
issues.
The client's first contact with the counsellor will be either by sending a letter
or calling up through telephone to seek an appointment or by face to face
contact, if there is a drop-in service or crisis service. So, therapists need to
be appropriately prepared and monitor how the clients experience this first
cominunication. This may be a crisis intervention. Along with dealing with the
presenting problems, arrangements can be made for further counselling
appointments also.
The counsellor should be aware and be able to judge the point at which the
individual, family or couple needs to be sent for another opinion. Therapist
should have a list of professionals working in the locality to refer. Send the 7
Processes of Counselling and client to the exact place and concerned person. A referral note containing a
Family Therapy
brief introduction about the individual or couple or family and its problems
should be sent to the professional whom you are referring, along with request
to give you feedback.
Goal
The main goal of intake process is mapping the aspects of systems of the
present complaint. This is limited to defining those aspects of the systems
which are relevant to the immediate presenting difficulty and to the immediate
family.
Intake is basically the first meeting, the individual, family or couple has with
therapist. It is very important in many ways in the therapy. The individual,
family or couple may come for therapy as referred by somebody or by self
or after getting an appointment with the therapist or just walk-in for the
meeting. In any case, therapist meets them. Intake is the initial session with
them to understand their concerns and reasons for the visit, in brief. You may
not see all significant persons during the intake. You may get a person who
seeks help for others too. In any case, it becomes the responsibility of therapist
to enquire abo~it their problems. \
2. Understanding reason for the session: Ask them about the reason for
meeting family therapist or counsellor, which helps in understanding their
difficulties. As far as possible try to avoid using the words like 'problem'
and 'why'. Family therapist or counsellor needs to enquire about what
each member thinks, and what the problem is. It is essential to get
perception of each member. 11
Processes of Counselling and 3. Understanding the expectations: It is important to understand
Family Therapy
individual's/family's expectations from the therapy and reason for seeking
help at this point of time. This is in order to understand how serious they
are with their help seeking behaviour and also to understand what steps
they had taken in the past to handle those issues. The family should be
explained about the role of dialogues in family therapy. Sometimes, they
may also expect miracles to happen. Therapist needs to discuss with
them about their various unrealistic and realistic expectations.
5. Duration of intake: The intake session should not go on for a long time
as this is intended to be brief, to understand their primary concerns. The
session should take maximum 20 to 30 minutes. During this time the
therapist needs to understand the presenting complaint in systemic
perspective.
6. Payment norms: Payment for the session depends on the agency with
which the familty therapist or counsellor is working. The agency will have
its policies on charging the session. Usually, in the intake session, family
therapist or counsellor is expected to explain to the family or couple
about the payment aspects, so that the family can be prepared for the
payment or they have the choice to opt out.
8. Motivating the family for therapy: The intake session is not only
deciding minutes to screen the family for assessment, but there may be
some other family members who are not fully willing for family therapy.
The family therapist or counsellor needs to motivate all the members for
family therapy; in particular to work on their relationship or presenting
problems.
relationship. 13
Processes of Counselling and 3. Being neutral: Family therapist or counsellor who tries to understand the
Family Therapy
family will have to take a neutral position. In simple words, she or he
should not be taking sides with any of the members. It is obvious to see
in family therapy that family therapists or counsellors gets attracted more
to the sufferer or the underdog. Or sometimes spend a little more time
with one family member than another. Family therapist or counsellor taking
such a stand in favour of a single family member, can cause differences
in the rapport of the family therapist or counsellor and the other family
member and Family therapist or counsellor should ask questions to each
family member, give equal time for each member and avoid meeting
single members unless and until she or he can give equal time for each
member.
The important points that should be kept in mind while keeping records are:
xiv) Family therapists or counsellors create records and to the extent the
records are under their control. They maintain, disseminate, store, retain,
and dispose of records and data relating to their professional and scientific
work. It is done in order to:
(1) facilitate provision of services later by them or by other professionals,
(2) allow for replication of research design and analyses,
(3) meet institutional requirements,
(4) ensure accuracy of billing and payments, and
(5) ensure compliance with law. Family therapists or counsellors, maintain
confidentiality in creating, storing, accessing, transferring and disposing
of records under their control, whether these are written, automated
or in any other medium. Documentation should protect clients' privacy
to the extent that is possible and appropriate, and should include
only information that is directly relevant to the delivery of services.
They store records following the termination of services to ensure
reasonable future access. Records should be maintained for the
number of years required by state statutes or relevant contracts.
Case illustration
Therapist: Good afternoon.
Rahul: Good afternoon.
Therapist: I am Mr. Chetan, could you introduce yourself?
Rahul: I am Rahul and she is my wife Priya. We are basically
working in sofiW;"e company in this city.
Therapist: Could you tell me what brings you here?
Rahul: Well, we have been married for the last five months and
we find if difficult to live together.
Priya: Of course. I feel the same and rest of the reason we need
your help to find out and help ourselves.
Rahul: Yes. We are aware and we agree to it. We will meet you
tomorrow.
15.12 GLOSSARY
Intake Session Initial family interviewing; it would be presumptuous
to suggest there is 'one' correct way to carry out
such a consultation.
2. How can referral help the family and the family therapist?
4. What are the aspects that a family therapist or counsellor needs to bear
in mind?
Becaver, RJ. & Becaver, D.S, (1982); Systems theory and family therapy:
A primer. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
" .""
19
UNIT 16 INITIAL PHASE
16.1 Introduction
16.1 INTRODUCTION
The family systems perspective holds that individuals are best understood in
the context of relationships and a "client's" problem might be an indication of
how the system functions and is not just a symptom of the individual's
maladjustment, history and psychosocial development. To focus on just the
individual dynamics without considering the interpersonal dynamics yields an
incomplete picture. Therefore, a treatment plan that addresses both the 'client'
and the larger context is necessary.
Most commonly families seeking family therapy are the following :
• Concerns about children or adolescents;
• Families reporting that members have problems in relating to each other;
• Families in which one of the family members has a chronic illness and the
family members want to understand how to cope with it better; and
• Families that appear to be having difficulty making the changes required
to pass from one developmental stage to the next - for example when
adolescents start to become more autonomous.
• Family therapy in such cases is an effective way of dealing with concerns
which are set in a troubled family system. It may often be suitably
combined with treatment of individual family members:
Objectives
/
Initial Phase
16.2 MAIN THEME OF INITIAL PHASE
The initial stage is a very crucial stage in any form of therapy. It's the stage
where a working relationship is established with the family. It also involves
motivating the family to accept treatment and clarifying any misconceptions the
family might have about therapy. The therapist right from the initial meeting
tries to alter the individual/family's perspective of the problem. An effort is
made to weaken the idea that the presenting problem associated with the
index patient is encased within that person; instead the problem is perceived
to be a by-product of the situation that individual is in. In other words,
therapy involves understanding what the individual/family wants, how they see
the problem, and how well the therapist can help each family member take
up responsibility for it. Then, the initial phase also involves defining tentative
goals for therapy which can either be modified or more precisely defined
during the course of therapy.
16.2.1 Assumptions.
The family perspective is grounded on the assumptions that the presenting
concern of the family may:
1. Serve a function or purpose for the corrective maladaptive/deficient family
pattern,
2. Maintain homeostatis in the family,
21
Processes of Counselling and
Family Therapy 16.3 ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN INITIAL PHASE
Assessment reflects the theoretical basis of the therapists. But, regardless of
the theoretical background, a careful and thorough assessment is very important
for successful therapy. A psychoanalytic therapist emphasises interactional themes
including presenting complaints. Systems theorists centre assessments around
certain core themes or dimensions for all the family members. Behaviourists
focus on the stimulus-response contingencies in interactions. The presenting
complaints may be taken at face value in systems perspective or behavioural
perspective but not in psychoanalytic perspective. However, the aim of the
assessment process is to understand the current functioning of the family.
There are two ways of achieving this; these are given below:
2. Ask relevant questions and study carefully the responses of the family
members, that is, both verbal and non verbal.
The therapist should explain to the family that the sessions would be once or
twice a week, and each session for about an hour.
The therapist should stress on the need for the entire family to attend the
sessions and elaborate on the same: To help the family members understand
the importance of this, the therapist may point out that:
• The other members of the family might be a part of the solution and may
be able to help in the improvement of the problem behaviour.
Even when the family members are reluctant to attend, the therapist will be
able to gather information regarding the system's functioning and resistances.
The therapist begins the process by obtaining details about various .family
events arid observing the interaction between the members of the family and
uses this to gradually understand the past and the present of the family life
and the family history gradually emerges over the course of therapy.
The therapist at this stage has to deal with the expectations that the family has
regarding therapy. They have to be helped to understand that the change will
happen gradually in the family and cannot be brought about at the end of
every seSSIOn.
22
Most family therapy is conducted by a s010 therapist "though therapist pairs Initial Phase
and multiple observer- consultant teams are common in some training centres.
.• There are goals which are short term and help the family in the process of \l,
.achieving their own or the therapist's objectives. These are sometimes referred
to as process goals. Common forms of such mediating or process goals are
achievement of insight, the teaching of various interpersonal skills, for example,
communication and problem-solving, and the disruption of problem-maintaining
patterns of behaviour to allow family members to learn more adaptive responses.
Mediating goals may also be more abstract and are not necessarily discussed
with the families by the therapist.
• Reframing
Reframing refers to changing the perspective of the family members about an
issue such that, the meanings of the behaviours associated with that issue are
_viewed in a different way so that modifying the behaviour becomes easier for
the person or family.
The member's intent behind the actions can be positively viewed, not necessarily
the actions themselves. The parents, for instance, may be using inappropriate
methods to discipline the child, may be using physical or verbal abuse. But,
the intent of disciplining the child is commendable if not the 'means'. This
feedback might help the parents think of other 'means' to achieve the same
goal namely, disciplining the child.
• A brief description of the presenting concern that has led the family to
seek help, and of the expectations they have from therapy,
• Family members' ages, relationships, occupations, and the family's
developmental stage (genogram),
The formulation also should logically -lead to the treatment plan and the
prognosis - with and without treatment.
Arranging the Next Step: Following are the signs of successful completion
of initial phase and preparation for middie phase:
It is important that the family knows what is to happen next when they leave
the initial interview.
Note: a) Read the following questions carefully and answer in the space
provided below.
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
2. What is circularity?
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
3. What is neutrality?
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
4. What is refrarning?
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
-------------------------- 27
, ,
Processes of Counselling and
Family Therapy 5. What are the main aspects of a family formulation?
• During the initial phase itself, the therapist helps the family understand that
the presenting problem associated with one person is not only due to that
person; instead it is seen in the context of the interpersonal relationships
in the family.
• The assessment phase begins with the therapist joining the family and
establishing a relationship based on trust and respect with all the members
of the family.
• The family and the therapist are jointly responsible for discussing the
goals of therapy.
• Some of the techniques that would be useful to keep in mind through out
the process of therapy are neutrality, refrarning and the method of circular
questioning. This would help in building and strengthening alliance with the
members and also enhance their motivation to change.
• The referral sources are also involved in the treatment process if and
when necessary.
16.8 GLOSSARY
Circularity Ability -of the therapist to ask questions based
on the feedback of the family members on
therapist's earlier asked questions about the
family.
1. The common contexts in which a family therapist sees clients are families
with concerns about children or adolescents, families reporting that members
have problems in relating to each other, one of the family members has
a chronic illness and the family members want to understand how to
cope with it better, and families with difficulty in transition from one stage
to the next.
2. The important things to be covered during the initial phase of therapy are
establishing rapport, alteration of problem perception, motivating the family
for change and setting of tentative goals.
2. Process goals can be defined as short term goals that help the family in
the process of achieving their own or the therapist's objectives.
29
Processes of Counselling and Check Your Progress Exercise 3
Family Therapy
1. The six dimensions assessed in the Structural Family Systems Rating
Scale are structure, resonance, flexibility, developmental stage, identified
patienthood and conflict resolution.
••
Szapocznik, J.; Hervis, 0.; Rio, Arturo T.; Mitrani, & Victoria B. (1991).
Assessing change in family functioning as a result of treatment: ~~ "tro!~tural
Family Systems Rating scale (SFSR). Journal of Marital & Family Therapy,
17(3), 295-310.
30
UNIT 17 MIDDLE PHASE
Structure
17.1 Introduction
17.6 Glossary
17.1 INTRODUCTION
The middle phase of therapy marks the beginning of the intervention phase.
Through the assessment, the therapist obtains information on the problem areas,
the structure and functioning of the family and its strengths. Most importantly,
assessment contributes to the development of the family hypothesis. An
important, initial task of the middle phase is the formulation of therapy goals.
The second task of the middle phase is to address the therapy goals by
employing various family therapy techniques. Some techniques employed are
common across the different schools of family therapy, while others are more
specific to a particular school. Usually, techniques are integrated from different
schools to best achieve the goals of therapy. The middle phase of therapy
usually incorporates an average of fifteen sessions. The number of sessions
may vary across families. Some individuals/families that present with more
complex issues require more number of sessions. The usual frequency of
sessions is once or twice a week. In this Unit, we will study about the middle
phase of counselling/family therapy.
31
Processes of Counselling and Objectives
Family Therapy
After studying the Unit, you will be able to:
Long-term goals reflect the domains of the family functioning that need to be
improved. These may include: (a) increasing intimacy between couple; (b)
increasing cohesiveness; (c) making the hierarchies more age appropriate; (d)
encouraging forgiveness in the relationship; (e) building trust between family
members; (f) creating healthier subsystem boundaries; and (g) creating healthier
external boundaries to make families self-reliant for negotiating future events.
P was second of four siblings and reported her family to be conflictual. There
were frequent fights between parents about how things needed to be done at
home. Father was the nominal and functional head, though his leadership was
challenged by her mother: Decision making was chaotic, though most of the
time mother had to do what the father said. P felt that the parents were often
so involved in their fights that she felt left out. She learnt the habit of asserting
herself as she wanted her needs met. Comparatively close relationship was
present between the siblings. P was often the person who was good at things
but at times felt that her family favoured her brothers. She often took
responsibility for her siblings and advised them, but felt unappreciated.
Communication was instrumental and emotional. Roles were gender specific.
Family rituals were present.
Courtship
The couple had an arranged marriage with the courtship lasting four months.
Both families liked the proposal on account of the family background, partners
being well educated and financially independent. Communication was minimal
during the courtship and at times initiated on wife's insistence. Husband wanted
a wife who could be his companion and who would be able to get along with
his family such that there would not be any fights. Wife wanted a partner who
would be able to appreciate her for who she was; who loved, supported and
cared for her.
The couple lived as a joint family after marriage. Fights usually revolved
around wife feeling unsupported' by the husband. P experienced role strain on
account of continuing with her job and looking after -the family. She felt family
was unappreciative and un-cooperative as she put in her level best to fulfill
her responsibilities. She often felt B was unable to take a stand or a decision;
often she had to push him to do something. Husband felt that P was often
dominating; telling him what to do. He felt incompetent and began to feel less -
confident about his ability to handle his family. During fights B would often
withdraw, angering P more. P thought that B kept quiet as he did not understand
what she meant and would often continue to explain things to him for a long
time. B at that point would tune himself out, superficially agree with P and
then not do it. This angered P more and she felt that B did not listen to her
or respect her.
35
Processes of Counselling and Married Couple .with Child 0-3 Years
Family Therapy
Couple planned a child within a year of marriage. Over a period of time the
above mentioned pattern of interaction was further established. P experienced
a greater role strain with the birth of M. Though she had some help from B's
parents in bringing up the child, she felt his parents where indulging M. This
increased fights at home and increased the occasions where P expected B to
take a stand.' make a decision or support her in front of his parents. B felt
that P was always angry with him and kept demanding more from him. B felt
that P's behaviour of confronting his parents was leading to a tense atmosphere
at home.
Couple decided to separate from B's parents when M was three years.
P decided to quit her job and become a homemaker. B felt that separation
was a way of decreasing fights at home. Though role strain felt by P was
marginally reduced and B was supportive in childcare, the other pattern of
interaction continued. P felt that every thing at home was her responsibility. B
had to be continuously reminded of things like bills, or maintenance work at
home. B gradually felt less and less need to remind himself of it as he felt
that anyway P would tell him about it. P felt she was the only one thinking
about their family and their relationship and felt tired of being the responsible
one. Parenting roles were shared by the couple and M shared a close
relationship with both parents. M also shared a good relationship with her
grandparents; however, P felt that times when M was with her paternal
grandparents they indulged her and often put P down in front of M or
challenged her disciplining style. She found B unsupportive in trying to establish
a boundary with his parents.
With the same pattern of interaction fights continued to increase with B beginning
to avoid time spent with P. P felt increasingly unloved, unsupported and sad.
B often came back late from work as he felt uncomfortable in the tensed
atmosphere at home. Fights increased with M often witnessing these. For the
last few weeks parents reported that M would start crying or getting angry
if the couple had any fights. This ended the fights as the couple paid attention
to M. At times M became more clingy and demanding and parents would
have a difficulty disciplining her or understanding her behaviour. Both felt
alarmed when the teacher also noticed changes in M's behaviour.
By the end of assessment, information was obtained about the life cycle
stages, maladaptive interaction cycles, and behaviour of each of the family
members and their feelings about the situation and each other.
Therapists need to gather information across all three areas: behaviour, thoughts
and feelings. Even across the family therapy, continuous intormation is obtained
across these areas. For this family, more information was available about
behaviour; thoughts and feelings about each other need to be explored more.
In his family of origin, B learnt the conflict resolution style that the best way
to deal with conflict is to avoid it. He avoided conflict with dominating people
(father) and became passive aggressive. He saw mother agreeing to everything
father had to say and appreciated her being selfless. In her family of origin,
P was always the responsible one, but felt unappreciated for her strengths.
She saw that mother could oppose the father but, there was no point as he
did what he wanted. She learnt that asserting herself was important.
After marriage B's expectation of having a companion and no fights in the
family was not fulfilled. P found herself again being the one taking responsibility
of the relationships and not being supported or appreciated by B. B began
to view P as dominating and reacted to her in the same way as he would
to his father. P became more adamant about asserting herself as B often
would not do what she asked and neither would he independently take
responsibility for things. Both felt disappointed in each other and their
relationship. The more P as-serted herself or made B sit down and listen to
her the more he tuned out and did what he pleased and lost confidence in
himself. He felt that P was constantly undermining him. B was unable to get
a feeling of companionship and P felt uncared for. The disappointment and
fights increased over the years. The couple started to drift apart. Further, their
style of conflict resolution (B withdrawing P becoming aggressive) continues to
feed relationship anxiety. Thus, a mutually dissatisfying cycle of interactions is
perpetuated. M's getting aggressive, clingy or demanding was a reaction to
fights at home. M was feeling emotionally insecure. Often her crying and
aggression made the parents stop the fights and this reinforced her behaviour.
Further, disagreements over how to discipline M between P and B' s parents
was increasing the disciplining problems they faced with M.
Though both accepted the hypothesis, they had difficulty understanding the
systemic view. They blamed each other for their fights. P felt that B deliberately
did not want to listen to her and took pleasure in making her angry. B felt
that P was dominating, thought he was incompetent and incapable of anything
and he felt tensed with her. Each felt the other should change. These negative
attributions that they had about each other were reframed - couple was
helped to see them not as inherent faults in each other but as the outcome
of their interaction pattern where each was arousing these feelings and thoughts
in the other. This helped the couple shift their stance from individual to systemic,
decrease blame and made them willing to explore it further as a goal of
family therapy.
Not all issues identified during assessment are addressed in family therapy ..
37
Family therapists need to identify those areas, where change will lead to
Processes of Counselling and maximum positive impact on the relationship. The couple was helped identify
Family Therapy the following goals:
• Addressing wife's anger and feeling that the family was only her
responsibility,. and
Long-term goals
• Clarity on expectations from relationship
17.3.5 Intervention
Intervention began simultaneously across the different goals set in therapy.
Primarily the interventions described here can be understood as: doing systemic
work, changing dysfunctional thoughts and feelings; and skill building
(communication, conflict resolution and problem solving). It is discussed here
in the order of intervention techniques and not in the order in which it occurred
across sessions.
Right at the beginning of therapy one rule was set for the couple, that is,
there would be no fighting in front of M. Consent and cooperation was
elicited from both spouses. They were helped to understand the negative
psychological impact of M being a witness to their fights. Both agreed to
make efforts to do the same.
The interaction pattern identified was repeated in the session, with P automatically
assuming responsibility for the discussion and B not participating much. Efforts
made by P to elicit an opinion from B were met by silence; this increased her
. giving explanations to him about what they should be doing as parents. B
response to this was saying yes to P that he would do what she asked him
to do. P interpreted this as a again putting responsibility on her, which led to
increased anger in P. At this point the family therapist needs to create space
and support the partner who usually speaks less in order to encourage them.
Setting up communication rules of the session like each partner will get their
own time to talk; respecting each other's time to talk; emphasising on the
importance of listening to each other; importance of respecting diverse views
'of the p~rtner even if they are different from your own; and making them
understand that both are likely to have different perspective on things and this
does not make either person a 'liar', are often helpful in making the partners
slow down and listen to each other.
Interactions can be broken down and the couple can be helped to reflect on
38 their feelings a'nd verbalise' them. Asking both partners about 'how the
interaction went, how would they like it to be different and what made P Middle Phase
angry and B withdraw' helps elicit both feelings and thoughts about their
interaction. This lays the foundation of systemic intervention with the family.
Often the therapist can assist this process by breaking down the sequence of
the interaction and encouraging reflections from partners on each aspect. Family
therapists can also add their own reflections in order to prompt reflections
from clients. This process helped B identify that he was not just tensed when
with P, but felt scared of her. His fear of her prevented him from voicing any
ideas and he put the responsibility of the decision on P (connecting feeling
with behaviour). B realised that his assumption that 'P will take care of
everything anyway' had kept him from paying attention to P's needs (connecting
thoughts with emotions and behaviour). B made negative attributions that
P was aggressive and critical of him. This made his behaviour towards P
passive aggressive and dismissive 'of her feelings. P's aggressiveness was
reframed as her clarity of thought and desire to do the best for her family.
P identified that it was important for her to do the right thing for her family.
This implicit expectation ofherself became stronger when she felt that she
could not rely on B to think for their family. She was able to reflect that
it was this expectation that increased the pressure she put on herself and on
B. Further, P was encouraged to reflect on B's disclosure of his feelings (he
felt scared of her). P initially felt angry at how could B think of her like that.
Questions like; "What did you feel when he shared this with you? Is he
usually withdrawn with all people? How are his interactions different with
other people? What could be the reason for this difference?" helped P reflect
s
on her behaviour. Here the positive aspect of B feeling was emphasized;
it was important for B what P thought of him. P was able to state that her
anger was not because of B's inability to take responsibility, rather because
he could not be open with her about his thoughts and feelings. This made her
feel insecure. Encouraging B to reflect on this helped him understand P's
fears. This identification of underlying feelings, fears, insecurities and needs in
I.
These insights into what caused and maintained their dysfunctional patterns
., weJe translated into goals for change. Couple was helped to discuss about
what-they would like their relationship to be like in the future. This solution
focused technique was used to help the couple identify what they would like
to see changing in their relationship to make it better. This also helped clarify
expectations from the relationship. B identified increased participation in family
decision making, and spending more time with wife and increased comfort in
being himself in the relationship as his therapy goals. P identified working on
her anger, directly asking for B's involvement and being open to B's ideas as
goals for herself. Family therapist also interpreted P's actively pursuing any
decision and. trying to gain control as a way of achieving security in the
mamage.
While it was encouraged that B become more open about his thoughts and
feelings, P's style of communication often prevented an open discussion from
taking place. P's frequent and uncontrolled expressions of anger came in the
way of B feeling safe with her. B's lack of assertive skills prevented him from
opening up with P. For instance, while discussing how they would make M. 39
Processes of Counselling and feel more secure and how they can address her behavioural problems, P
Family Therapy made statements like 'You are ridiculous, you don't know how to handle
her'. B withdrew initially and then hesitantly said that 'She always thought that
she knew what was the best, if that was so then things would not have gone
wrong'.
While communicating it was found that P's tone of voice was sarcastic; she
would get loud and start raising her voice when angry - these were related
to B withdrawing from the interaction. B's silence and using a blaming or
dismissive stance caused P to get angry. Often B would not pay attention to
P as a result when P asked him something he would not respond appropriately.
Communication skills taught to them included active listening skills like:
maintaining eye contact; not interrupting a partner, rather waiting for them to
finish; listening to partner, asking a question, clarifying or confirming if they
have understood it correct and then giving a response; listening to what the
partner is saying now, and not responding on the assumption that she or he
is going to always say the same thing, and; understanding partner's point of
view were taught. P was also encouraged to modulate her tone of voice,
especially when angry.
Couple was explained regarding not using derogatory labels for each other. P
often had a habit of telling B, "How can you be so stupid". This was
discouraged and more respectful communication style of making requests, giving
positive feedback and not using any threats or ultimatums was taught. They
were helped to understand that when communication breaks, both people are
responsible for its failure and blaming the other does not help.
Boundary issues with B's parents were addressed in the end. This was done
so as the family of origin is a sensitive subject and more importantly the
martial subsystem needs to be strong enough to negotiate with it. Both were
asked to discuss what did M being close to her paternal grandparents mean.
P was able to clarify that she wanted M to be close to both sets of
grandparents but felt hurt when the paternal grandparents put P down; she felt
hurt and felt that they did not consider her a part of the family. P wanted to
share a positive relationship with them but did not know how to begin.
Clarification of this helped soften B's stand regarding the issue. Both were
encouraged to problem solve regarding how would they like to communicate
the same, who will do it, how would they like to encourage a more positive
relationship, and what behaviours could make it happen.
Solutions to any problem need to emerge from the couple and are not provided
ready made by the therapist. The therapist can guide the partners in reaching
a solution by facilitating the process. It is only when the family members come.
up with a solution will they be motivated to work towards it.
ii) Resistance to family therapy does not affect the family therapy process.
17.6 GLOSSARY
Short-term goals The goals that are more immediate and need to be
achieved in order to address the larger goals.
1. Short term goals refer to the goals that are more immediate and need to
be achieved in order to address the larger goals. Some of the short-term
goals include:
vii) Creating healthier external boundaries, making families self reliant for
negotiating future events.
ii) False
iii) True 43
Processes of' Counselhng and
Family Therapy 17.8 UNIT END QUESTIONS
1. What are the tasks of the middle phase?
4. List some of the techniques that can be used to bring about a change
in maladaptive emotions.
'f·
44
UNIT 18 TERMINATION PHASE: END
PROCESSES
Structure
18.1 Introduction
18.9 Glossary
18.1 INTRODUCTION
Termination is often a topic that although important, is comparatively less
emphasised in literature. Much of the literature focus on how to initiate and
continue the therapy rather than how to end it (Barker, 1992). Nevertheless,
the way the therapist handles the therapy termination is important. Termination
of a therapy session and the therapeutic relationship are significant for the
client. Termination is a process and usually not carried out in a single session.
The termination phase may last up to three sessions. Sessions are gradually
tapered with longer gaps such that both the therapist and the family feel
confident of their ability to handle things on their own.
Family therapists usually begin by sharing with the families in the initial session
that the family therapy process is a time-limited relationship established for
achieving certain goals in family therapy. Even if the duration of family therapy
is not specified, clients know that it is a time-bound arid session-bound
relationship. This helps prepare the families for the termination right from the
beginning. We will learn about the termination phase of family therapy in this
Unit
45
Processes of Counselling and Objectives
Family Therapy
After studying this Unit, you will be able to:
• When objectives of the treatment are met. A review by both the therapist
and the family regarding whether the desired changes have taken place
helps clarify if the family is ready for termination. Asking the family to
examine what has changed is helpful. Termination is better accomplished
when the family members are able to see the extent of the changes that
have occurred, and when they realize their problem solving skills have
improved.
• At times the family therapist may decide to terminate the therapy if the
family's functioning has changed positively such that now they have the
resources needed to deal with any of the remaining problems. Here, even
though all the goals set are not met, if the family has the resources to
achieve them on their own, termination is planned. There may be structural
and functional changes in the family which enables the family members to
cope with problems that they could not have been able to solve earlier.
• Confidence of the family members in the changes they have been able to
bring about is another essential condition. Their confidence that they can
maintain these changes achieved in therapy indicates to the family therapist
that a termination can be planned. Also, certain techniques can be used
in termination to help them develop this confidence for immediate future
interactions and events the family will encounter after termination.
4. Identify Issues left out: Allow members to reflect on issues left out of
the sessions that they would like to address on their own. These can
either be goals that were established which the therapist feels the family
is capable of addressing, or these can be areas that have not been
explicitly addressed. Even asking the family what is it that they would like
to work on can identify left out issues.
5. Anticipatedproblems:Helping the family identify challenges it may face
in the future and how they can use their strengths and resources to meet
these challenges is useful. This prepares the family for what is likely to
happen. It helps build their confidence in their skills and also gives the 47
family therapist an idea of whether the family is ready for termination.
Processes of Counselling and 6. Reinforcement and hope building: The family therapist can also provide
Family Therapy
a recap of what changes she or .he has seen the family members make
during the course of therapy. Recognition of strengths of the family and
. individual members is useful. Positive reinforcement of the family members'
efforts builds hope and belief in their own ability to solve problems. This
also motivates them to maintain their efforts to improve as a family.
7. Plans for follow-up: The family therapist also makes plans for follow-up.
When the follow-up session can be scheduled and the purpose of the
follow-up session is explained to the family. Family is informed of the
availability of the family therapist if required; termination of sessions does
not imply that they cannot consult the family therapist ever again. Contact
numbers of the family therapist are made available. Family is informed
"regardingcoming for more sessions (booster sessions) if new issues emerge.
Case illustration
The termination phase of the couple discussed in Unit 17 on 'middle
phase' is discussed here. The middle phase of therapy with Band P
lasted for 14 sessions. Initially the sessions were held weekly. After session
six the sessions were made bi-monthly and then gradually tapered.
The termination phase with the family comprised of two sessions. Couple
was explained that the therapist felt that the family was ready to terminate
therapy. Both spouses felt that they too were ready to think of termination.
This phase focused on each partner's understanding of their relationship
and their family since the start of therapy. The presenting problems were
reviewed. Each partner was encouraged to verbalize their new understanding
of what had been happening in their family; each was able to reflect on
their own behaviour that was dysfunctional. The family therapist reviewed
the goals of the therapy with the couple. Both felt that they were able to
achieve most of the goals set at the beginning of therapy. They were able
to make M feel more secure and were able to discipline her better. M
was better adjusted at home and at school. Each felt the other was
supportive as a parent.
They were able to review the new understanding they had gained about
their own behaviour, needs and expectations from each other and the
relationship. Each member's confidence in the changes made was explored.
Both felt more confident about their style of interacting. B felt he was
more comfortable with P and was gaining confidence in his ability to make
decisions. P reported a better control over her anger and an increased
ability to involve B in discussions with her. Both were able to jointly take
decisions; though B felt that he himself would like to increase his
participation in the process by giving more ideas by himself rather than P
prompting him. New ideas about themselves and the relationship were
reviewed and where appropriate were readjusted by the family therapist.
Both also reported an increased emotional fulfillment as B was able to
respect P and be supportive of her. P felt more secure in the relationship.
B felt that he was able to build a sense of companionship in the relationship.
Quality time spent with the family had increased. Commitment of each
partner to the changes made was ensured. Both were hopeful and were
motivated to maintain the changes made.
Couple was also given space to freely reflect on issues left out of sessions
48 and what they would like to do about it on their own. P identified further
Termination Phase: End
increasing their intimacy as a goal. B was also able to acknowledge that. Processess
Both discussed ideas to enhance it further. P felt a more direct expression
of her needs would perhaps make it easier for B to recognize them. B
felt that whenever he was aware of P's needs, he would try and address
them. Here the family therapist made the expectations realistic that B may
not always be able to do so; this was not a sign of failure. Rather, both
spouses can acknowledge when they will not be able to address each
other's needs immediately.
Any problems that they could anticipate were also discussed. Changes
made by the couple like improved parenting, softening their stance towards
each other, greater understanding of each one's motivation, commitment to
new forms of communication and behaviours etc. were highlighted both as
hope building and as a review of gains achieved. This helped address the
anxieties regarding termination.
Couple was explained regarding a follow-up after 4 to 6 months. Contact
numbers were given and the couple was assured of family therapist's
availability if need arose. the idea and availability of booster sessions was
explained.
Some client related factors, that are related to unplanned terminations are:
• Some families may decide to terminate if they are not really interested in
improving their family functioning.
• At times, families may get referred to the family therapist and when they
come for therapy they may not have any idea of what family therapy is
all about. They corfie just because they have been referred. At times like
these, when the therapist explains to them what family therapy involves,
they may not feel the necessity to work on their family.
• At times when the family therapist is unable to help the family understand
the systemic view despite all efforts, and the family continues to see only
one individual in the family as problem, then the family is likely to drop
out of family therapy.
• Some families that have lived with their problems or dysfunctional patterns
for a long time may not engage in therapy.
• Lack of patience with the therapy process and lack of energy that is
required to be invested to bring about a change may also lead to abrupt
terminations.
• At times, families may expect that a single session will solve their problems.
The fact that there are no magical solutions may disillusion them.
50 • Some individual factors have been identified, that are related to individuals I
• At times, family therapy may be discontinued when one core family member
who is needed for the therapy decides not to come for therapy.
• Family therapists pushing their own agenda in family therapy and dismissing
family's agenda entirely.
• Times where the family therapist is unable to control the session process
such that it allows all the family members to feel safe in the session may
lead to drop-out of a family member and thus the family.
• Aligning only with one family member alienates the others leading to
termination.
• Sometimes a spouse may refuse to come for family therapy as they feel
that the therapist had already seen their partner earlier. It is helpful that
when the couple is seen together, therapists maintain neutrality and not
align only with the partner who sought therapy. Address the agenda of
the relationship and not the partner who came first for consultation.
• Difficulties in helping the family make some constructive use of the session,
especially, if they are not ready to work, or when little is accomplished
in therapy sessions may lead to terminations.
• Family therapist losing patience with the family and holding them responsible
for not changing.
51
Processes of Counselling and
Family Therapy 18.7 DEALING WITH UNPLANNED
TERl\1INATIONS
At times when unplanned terminations occur and where other family members
are left who still want to come for therapy, then the therapy is usually continued
with willing family members. The systemic view is retained and the members
are helped to achieve their goals for their family as best as they can. Efforts
to get the absent family member can still be made. Family therapists also need
to reflect if there was anything in the therapy process itself that may have led
to a family member dropping out of therapy. At times, family may approach
the family therapist after some time and want to resume therapy. This is
encouraged and their abrupt termination is not held against them.
ii) False
iii) True
2. Following are the steps of termination process:
i) Inform regarding planning of termination
iv) unrealistic
Notes
' ..
MCFT-004
COUNSELLIN G AND FAMILY THERAPY: APPLIED ASPECTS
, i
ISBN : 978·81·266·5227·3