Biostat Intro
Biostat Intro
Basic steps:
1. Making observation
2. Generating a hypothesis
3. Deciding how to test the hypothesis
4. Experimenting
Importance of studying Biostatistics
• It is a tool in the decision making process. An
information based decision making process
needs application of biostatistics.
Various Measurements:
Ratio Scale: The measurements scales having a constant
size interval and true zero point.
25
Population
26
Sample
27
Correlational Studies
29
Experiments
• The goal of an experiment is to demonstrate a cause-and-effect
relationship between two variables; that is, to show that changing the
value of one variable causes changes to occur in a second variable.
31
Experiments (cont.)
• In an experiment, one variable is manipulated to create
treatment conditions. A second variable is observed and
measured to obtain scores for a group of individuals in each
of the treatment conditions. The measurements are then
compared to see if there are differences between treatment
conditions. All other variables are controlled to prevent
them from influencing the results.
32
Other Types of Studies
• Other types of research studies, know as non-experimental or quasi-
experimental, are similar to experiments because they also compare
groups of scores.
• These studies do not use a manipulated variable to differentiate the
groups. Instead, the variable that differentiates the groups is usually a
pre-existing participant variable (such as male/female) or a time variable
(such as before/after).
34
Other Types of Studies (cont.)
35
Descriptive Statistics
37
Inferential Statistics
38
Sampling Error
39
Notation
41
Order of Operations
Example:
• To assess whether or not saccharine is carcinogenic, a
researcher feeds 25 mice daily doses of saccharine.
After 2 months 10 of the 25 mice have developed
tumors.
Data Sources
• To assess whether or not saccharine is
carcinogenic, a researcher feeds 25 mice daily
doses of saccharine. After 2 months 10 of the 25
mice have developed tumors.
NOT A GOOD EXPERIMENT!
Solution:
Select 25 more mice and treat them exactly the same
but give them daily doses of an inert substance a
placebo.
Data Sources
• Suppose that in the control group only 1 mouse
develops a tumor, Is this evidence of a
carcinogenic effect?
Solution:
Starting with 50 relatively homogeneous (similar)
mice, randomly assign 25 to the saccharine
treatment, and 25 to the control treatment.
Data Sources
Randomization an extremely important aspect of
experimental design.
• No intervention
• Data collected on an existing system.
o Less expensive
o Easier logistically
o More often ethically practical
o Interventions often not possible
Types of Obervational Studies
1. Case studies or case series
A descriptive account of interesting characteristics
(e.g., symptoms) observed in a single case (subject
with disease) or in a sample of cases.
Advantages:
• Useful for studying rare disease
• Useful for studying diseases with long latency periods
• Can explore several potential risk factors (exposures) for disease
simultaneously
• Can use existing data sources –cheap, quick, easy to conduct
Disadvantages:
• Prone to methodological errors and biases
• Dependent on high quality records
• Difficult to select an appropriate control group
• More diffcult statistical methods required for proper analysis
Types of Obervational Studies
3. Cross-sectional studies
Collect data from a group of subjects at one point in
time.
Sometimes called prevalence studies, due to their
focus on a single point in time.
Types of Obervational Studies
3. Cross-sectional studies
Advantages:
• Often based on a sample of the general population, not just people
seeking medical care.
• Can be carried out over a relatively short period of time.
Disadvantages:
• Difficult to separate cause and effect because measurement of
exposure and disease are made at one point in time so it may not be
possible to determine which came first
• Are biased toward detecting cases with disease of long duration and
can involve misclassications of cases in remission or under eective
medical treatment
• Snapshot in time can be misleading in a variety of other ways
Types of Obervational Studies
4. Cohort Studies
Usually conducted prospectively (forward in time)
A cohort is a group of people who have something in
common at a particular point in time and who remain
part of the group through time.
A cohort of disease free subjects are selected and
their exposure status evaluated at the start of the
study.
They are then followed through time in order to
observe who develops disease.
Association between exposures (risk factors) and
disease are then quantified.
Types of Obervational Studies
3. Cohort studies
Advantages:
• Useful when exposure of interest is rare
• Can examine multiple effects (e.g., diseases) of a single exposure
• Can elucidate temporal relationship between exposure and disease
thereby getting closer to causation
• Allows direct measurement of incidence of disease
Disadvantages:
• Ineffcient for studying rare diseases
• Generally requires a large number of subjects
• Expensive and time consuming
Exercise
1. Consider a survey of nurses’ opinions of their
working conditions. What type of variables are:
(i) length of service
(ii) staff grade
(iii) age
(iv) salary
(v) number of patients seen in a day
(vi) possession of a degree.
Exercise
2. What differences do you think are there
in a discrete measurement such as shoe
size, and a discrete measurement such as
family size?
Exercise
3. You want to determine if cinnamon reduces a
person’s insulin sensitivity. You give patients who
are insulin sensitive a certain amount of cinnamon
and then measure their glucose levels. Is this an
observation or an experiment? Why?