Panzarella (1980) Phenomenology of Aesthetic Peak Experiences (Journal of Humanistic Psychology)
Panzarella (1980) Phenomenology of Aesthetic Peak Experiences (Journal of Humanistic Psychology)
Psychology
http://jhp.sagepub.com/
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Additional services and information for Journal of Humanistic Psychology can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://jhp.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://jhp.sagepub.com/content/20/1/69.refs.html
What is This?
Downloaded from jhp.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on April 9, 2014
THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF
AESTHETIC PEAK EXPERIENCES
1
SUMMARY
Descriptions of music and visual art peak experiences obtained from 103
persons were content analyzed and factor analyzed. Four phenomenological
factors emerged: renewal, motor-sensory, withdrawal, and fusion-emotional
experiences. Renewal experiences were more associated with visual art ac-
counts, and motor-sensory experiences with music accounts. Renewal factor
scores were positively correlated with measures of sensation seeking and
theories.
This article is based on a doctoral dissertation to which the reader is referred for further
1
details and amplifications: The phenomenology ofpeak experiences of music and visual art and
some personality correlates, University Microfilms No. 77-13, 856. The author especially
METHOD
Extensive pilot studies were done to devise a questionnaire capable of
eliciting rather complete descriptions of peak experiences. The final ver-
simon asked the respondent to report an &dquo;intense joyous experience&dquo; of
listening to music or looking at visual art. First the respondent named or
described the aesthetic stimulus and told what the day had been like up to
the time when the experience occurred. To get a thorough report of the
experience itself, the questionnaire used repeated promptings set in a
temporal framework (for example, describe the beginning of the experi-
ence, the build-up, the most intense point). This framework was derived
from Buchenholz and Naumburg’s (1957) five-stage model of pleasurable
experiences.
The respondent also reported age, sex, educational background, and art
or music background, and completed a short form (M 1) of the Marlow-
Crowne Social Desirability Scale (Strahan & Gerbasi, 1972), the Existen-
fiahty Scale of Shostrom’s (1966) Personal Orientation Inventory, and a
22-item self-rating scale devised for this study. The self-rating scale was
refined psychometrically through pilot studies. Using a Likert format, it
asked about physical health and contained seven subscales of three items
each: ~rz) object perception (e.g., I notice right away when people wear new
clothes or change their hair style), ~b) self-perception (e.g., I am a complex
person difficult to describe in a few words), (c) sensation seeking, (d)
en~otion~lit~~ (e) cognitive activity, (e.g., I am good at solving puzzles and
problems), ~ motor activity, (g) sociability (e.g., I like parties). These
seven subscales corresponded to major categories in the content analysis.
Behind them lies the question of whether the dominant elements of a peak
experience reflect the dominant elements of personality (e.g., Do people
who rate themselves especially high on cognitive activity as a personality
trait also report peak experiences in which cognitive content predom-
inates~).
The questionnaire was administered on an individual basis. Respon-
dents found it necessary to take the questionnaire and moll over ~, some-
times for weeks, before they could fifl it out. When the questionnaire was
returned, respondent were requested W participate in a follow-up inter-
view. Most respondents participated. In the interview the experience itself
was analyzed further and additional, far ranging questions about personal
and social dimensions of aesthetic experiences were discussed.
THE RESPONDENTS
CONTENT ANALYSIS
A content analysis scoring manual was constructed on the basis of relevant
prior research, especially Laski’s (1961) study of escstasy, and refined
through the pilot studies for this investigation. The manual defined and
illustrated 11 basic response categories: (a) object descriptions, (b) self-
descriptions, (c) attentional responses, (d) sensations, (e) motar responses,
( f) emotions, (g) aesthetic judgments, (h) other cognitive responses, (i)
social response, ( j) motivational responses, and (~) commentaries on the
experience. Most of these categories could be scored in three dimensions:
presence of the phenomenon, loss of the phenomenon, and transforma-
tion of the response modality. For example, an aesthetic judgment might
be made, critical analysis might cease, or aesthetic judgment might be
altered in the experience. Due to small numbers of responses in some
dimensions, for statistical analyses all kinds of transformations were
combined into one category, and losses were grouped into only two cate-
gories, loss of self and all other losses.
Three independent judges scored the data, using the manual. Interjudge
rehabilities for sortings into discrete categories were computed as sug-
gested by Sandifer, Fleiss, and Green (1968) using the criterion of agree-
ment by at least two out of three judges. Gross reliability, based on
separate dimensions for all categories, was .95; net reliability, based on
categories after combining some for statistical analysis, was .98.
RENEWAL ECSTASY
The present renewal ecstasy factor resembled Laski’s (1961) &dquo;knowledge
ecstasies,&dquo; except that the cognitive component was much more empha-
sized in her descriptions. But her accounts were mostly of religious ex-
periences, and ecstasy is a more legitimate source of &dquo;enlightenment’&dquo; in
religion than in aesthetics or other areas of human interest.
Among the cognitions of religious ecstatics reported by other in-
vestigators are visions of the world in pristine splendor and of future uto-
pias. The present world is seen in need of transformation, which can be
achieved through moral striving. This study found that the aesthetic ec-
static also experiences an altered perception of the world. The aesthet-
ic view, too, is an &dquo;oVerbel~ef&dquo; or &dquo;myth&dquo; in Laski’s sense, but one not
trapped in the past or future. The aesthetic ecstatic claims this new vision
is a view of the world as it is, actually, now. The world is better, more
beautiful than had been thought before. It contains the tragic and flawed,
but this does not alter its goodness. It is at this point that ecstasy might
engender philosophy. But the experiences reported in this study contained
no impulse to reconcile the paradoxes which are the food of philosophers.
The ecstatic prefers to keep the paradoxes.
The motivational aspects of renewal ecstasies consisted primarily of
impulses to produce music or visual art. These impulses appeared only in
experiences of people who had music or visual art abilities. There was no
instance of an experience which converted a non-performer to a per-
former. Laski may have been right in separating ecstasy from inspiration,
at least in the cases of persons with no performing background. It may be
true, too, that the impulse to be creative is inherently antithetic to the
continuation of ecstatic enjoyment and terminates ecstasy in order to
initiate creative probing and testing.
Renewal ecstasy factor scores were positively related to visual art (in a
correlation with visual art coded as I and music as 0), r = .23, p .02, to =
Neither renewal ecstasy nor any other type was related to a person’s age,
sex, education, approval motive score, visual art or music ability. The
renewal factor had the highest factor score for 38% of the visual art reports
and 14% of the music reports. For an example of a renewal ecstasy, here is
an account of an experience while looking at &dquo;light pastel colors, semi-
abstract paintings, the forms were indicated by coloring and had no
surrounding lines.&dquo;
Immediately I lost my tired feelings. I found the colors as something great,
profane; I experienced looking at the colors mainly in my thoughts. Except
for the moment that my tiredness was gone I was not further aware of my
body. I had the feeling of being more myself. I had the urge for activity. I
would have wanted to paint, instead I looked at more pictures. I felt light,
apart from regular, daily routine thinking. [Afterwards] I wanted to be alone
and recollect the colors I saw. Emotionally I felt more balanced, objective,
and I worked more easily.
I was familiar with the particular piece of music so there were many feelings
of anxiety to hear the crescendos, great feelings of joy and laughter as the
piece repeated itself to the final point. I applauded each time the violins
intersected at their fierce pace. I was appreciative of the genius that made me
feel so beautiful and refreshed inside. Delighted that I’d shared again in the
experience of Ravel. [Afterwards] I wanted to talk about the feelings I’d felt
with someone else and I also felt my need to produce. Most music has a
complete effect on me; this particular experience with Ravel only adds to that
positiveness.
MOTOR-SENSORY ECSTASY
WITHDRAWAL ECSTASY
Withdrawal ecstasies involve loss of contact with both the physical and
social environment. A perceptual narrowing occurs; attention is riveted to
the aesthetic stimulus. The stimulus may remain distinct from the per-
ceiver ; a fusion between the two need not occur. Sensations are included
in this factor too. Withdrawal ecstasies are not especially tragic or cathartic
p =
.05. The kind of person who has this kind of experience is one who
enjoys the company of others but has the self image of a unique and
complex person. These traits are visible in the following description of a
person looking at a Matisse collage of a blue female silouette against a
white background.
Complete respect. The beauty of the form completely overpowered me. I
could not walk away from it. Its beauty brought me very close to tears. I
couldn’t speak (a friend had been speaking to me). My eyes followed every
curve of the work. Drained. After about one-half hour of not moving my
friends got quite impatient and began to leave. I almost desperately tried to
capture every detail in my mind and upon leaving ran back to see it again for
a minute. [Afterwards I was] extremely withdrawn from everyone. I felt very
FUSION-EMOTIONAL ECSTASY
Emotional responses were linked especially to fusion experiences rather
than being equally common to all types of experiences. Although ecstasies
which involve fusion with the stimulus were rated highest on a scale of
desirability by Laski (1961), accounts of such ecstasies in response to music
or visual art were not related to personality transformations. The fusion
ecstasies described by Laski were religious ones, and the experience they
encompassed was a fusion with deity. The experience of merging with an
aesthetic object does not have the same effects. Both of the respondents
quoted below were among the small number who answered no to the
question of whether their experiences had any long-lasting effects on
them. Fusion-emotional ecstasies represented 27% of the music accounts
and 17% of the visual art accounts. The first narrative below is an account
of listening to a symphony, the composer of which had been forgotten; the
second is an account of looking at a painting of Joan of Arc.
The only way I can describe it is as being at one with the music and not only
with the music but with the people, concert hall, etc. It was as if it were inside
me. I can’t remember any feeling but a sort of crazy joy. What happened
afterwards, I don’t remember. Quietly happy. It had no effect except that I
was in a good mood-contented.
lt was a painting of Joan oI‘ Arc* I don~t recall the painter. But I remember that
I found it hard to believe that she wasn’t real. Her face struck me at first. I felt
pulled into it. I wanted to share the experience but it was so intensely personal
that it could not be shared. I felt a kind of private frustration. As the expe-
rience developed I moved or tried to move away from St. Joan to her sur-
roundings. But she almost walked out of the painting. It was as if she had
been waiting for me. I felt somehow spiritually tied to this work of art and was
very reticent to leave. I think I had selfish feelings as if the painting belonged
to me and no one else shared it unless they truly could become one with it.
At the same time I was certain no one else was capable of this but me.
What happened afterwards, I don’t know. I can’t remember. I think I felt
special, peaceful, for a short while. I was separated from those around me.
Stage 1 -
Stage 2
At the climax stage of the peak experience reports there was a loss or gain
of motor responses. These included locomotion, changes in posture, and
movements of distinct parts of the body, for example, opening of the
mouth, acceleration of heart beat or breathing, shivers. Foot or finger
tapping, shadow conducting, and walking around excitedly were common
responses to music. Visual art experiences often involved transfixiation.
Sometimes visual art experiences involved fantasied gross movements,
like flying. Motor responses might be increases or decreases in muscular
movements; it was the change in motor activity, not the motor responses
themselves, which was noteworthy.
In addition, the visual art accounts, but not the music experience ac-
counts, were characterized by losses of normal functioning beginning in
the second stage and extending into the third. These included loss of sense
of time, loss of spatial orientation, loss of reality testing, and loss of
sensations. Here are some prototypic climaxes.
I felt as though I could bear it no more, almost that I would leap from the
balcony.
I became aware of a feeling of elevation, as though my mind were not part of
my body but floating above it, in complete freedom. The music seemed to be
a force that could be felt moving through my body. My thoughts were very
free floating, although the sounds and vibrations of the music held my
attention. I was completely free.
looking in.
Seeming cessation of all sensual awareness other than sight. A feeling of
falling or reaching out or encompassing. I stood absolutely still, I think.
Stage 3
Emotional responses and transformations clustered at the end of music
and visual art experiences. That was also where social responses congre-
widespread and lasting effect of many modes of ecstasy. What may be a bit
different about the optimism of these accounts is that it is an optimism of
the present, not a utopia-oriented optimism. Honor (19 1) has suggested
that present oriented optimism is characteristic of liberals and reformers
in contrast to the future-oriented optimism of radicals and revolutionaries.
Following are some examples of &dquo;total&dquo; effects.
Part of my joy was in having confirmation that I was capable of such strong
involvement and emotional flow, that I could free myself or be freed from
watching my feelings from a distance and judging them and reducing them.
The long range effects were to be more open with some of my friends and to
be happy about life and my relationships with other people.
The efrects are now part of me and shall always be so. They ard what create
the person within me.
Smaller numbersof respondents described other effects, such as, altera-
~ons of aesthetic sensitivity thresholds, enhanced perception of everyday
reality, motivational effects, and rather long-lasting mood effects. Al-
though only renewal experiences were related to self-actualization as
tapped by the Existenfiahty scale and only withdrawal experiences were re-
lated to perception of oneself as a unique and complex person on the self-
rating scale, a wide range of effects from all types of experiences was re-
ported by the respondents in their peak experience narratives.
CONCLUSION
The phenomenology of aesthetic peak experiences can be viewed as a
three stage event with four major dimensions, any one of which may
predominate. There are phenomena particularly characteristic of the
onset stage, the climactic stage, and the post-climactic stage which Laksi
(1961) has appropriately named the &dquo;afterglow&dquo; stage. The sequence of
phenomena holds no matter whether the renewal, motor-sensory, with-
drawal, or fusion-emotional dimension predominates. The distinction
between experiences on the basis of which dimension predominates is of
more than academic interest, for there are significant correlates to these
dimensions. As Maslow (in Krippner, 1972) had discovered, some kinds of
experiences have greater impact on the person than others.
Accounts of peak experiences in response to other kinds of stimuli, such
as religion, cosmic, interpersonal, sex, and dance or sport experiences
were not reviewed in this article, but the typology of peak experiences
derived from the data of aesthetic experiences seems to be suitable for
accomodating peak experiences of all kinds. Some of the details, like a link
between cognitive and transformation responses, are already noted in
accounts of peak experiences triggered by meditation, nature, and
psychedelics. Fuller phenomenological accounts of peak experiences in
response to other kinds of stimuli are needed to test this hypothesis about
the universality of the phenomenological sequence and clusters.
There are indications that some of the phenomenology and the pro-
posed typology of peak experiences are related to personality differences
as well as to stimulus differences. Omitted from this report for brevity
sake are findings not related to the typology or aesthetic medium (e.g.,
social responses were significantly more frequent in males’ experiences
than in females&dquo; experiences; the range of effective peak experience trig-
gers for the individual was significantly correlated with the measure of
self-actualization). As far as the relationship between personality and the
typology of peak experiences is concerned, only the simplest of hypotheses
was tested and only in a cursory way. The hypothesis that peak expe-
riences mirror dominant aspects of everyday personality was tested with
only a short self-rating scale of personality traits. Renewal ecstasies were
significantly correlated with sensation seeking, and withdrawal ecstasies
with sociability and differentiated self-perception ~i.e., seeing oneself as
complex). But renewal experiences are highly cognitive, and withdrawal
experiences include withdrawal from other persons. If I were formulating
a new hypothesis at this point, it would be that peak experiences represent
REFERENCES
Reprint requests: Robert Panzarella, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, 444 West S6th
Street, New York, New York 10019.