OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Division of Bukidnon Final Rating: 4.43
School Year: 2021-2022 Description: VERY SATISFACTORY

KRA1 KRA2 KRA3 KRA4 KRA5 KRA6 Generated OPCRF

0.63 0.87 1.68 0.50 0.50 0.25 4.43
APPROVED:

RANDOLPH B. TORTOLA Innovated by:

Schools Division Superintendent ARIEL B. MONTECALBO, PhD
SGOD-Education Program Supervisor
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Means of Verifcation (MOVs)
s
per
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES c
Objectiv BACK
o
e
r
e
BASIC KRA 1 Leading 1. Formulated 1. Approved School Improvement Plan
EDUCATION Strategically (15%) transitional framework Produced all necessary documents for Delivers the school plans and (SIP)
SERVICES for school plans, the school plans, policies, and policies with high quality and 2. Approved School BE-LCP
policies, and 5 implementation with full support of Supporting Documents
produced quarterly reports on
internal & external stakeholders and the conduct of MOVs.
implementation vis-à-vis with complete 1 to 5 MOVs •Documentations on the conduct of
vision, mission, and core SMEA and other school plans related to
values of DepEd policy reviews and implementations
✘
• Duly received communication to
Produced necessary documents for the Provides the school plans and stakeholders and School Planning Team
school plans, policies, and
implementation with predominantly policies with high quality work for policy review formulation and
4 and produced MOVs in 3 implementation and SMEA including
support of internal & external
quarters out of 4. minutes of the meeting and attendance
stakeholders and with 4 out of 5 MOVs.
sheets.
✘

• Accomplishment reports on the

✘

Produced most of the documents planning policy reviews,

5.00 Delivers the school plans and implementations, SMEA
needed for the school plans, policies,
policies required and produced
3 and implementation with the limited MOVs in 2 quarters only out of
support of the internal and external 4.
stakeholders with 3 out of 5 MOVs.

Produced only 2 out of 5 necessary Frequently delivers the school

2 documents for the school plans, plans and policies and produced
policies, and implementation. MOVs only 1 out of 4 quarters.

Produced only 1 document out of 5 for The school plans and policies
1 the school plans, policies, and lack the necessary documents
implementation to support its implementation.

2. Established Capacitated the school personnel in Performed all the indicators Performed all the indicators Main Documents:
systematic practices in conducting research and innovation, according to the approved cost, before the target timeline and  Approved Training Design or LAC Plan and
and in designing and implementing and without compromising submission of accomplishment Accomplishment Report
capacitating school programs. implementation of other report.  Approved Research Proposals
personnel, research Produced and approved the proposals projects, activities, and programs  Reports for the utilized research findings
productivity and for research and innovation (PAPs).
dissemination, and (90%-100% teachers)
utilization of Disseminated 90-100% of the
teacher researches, innovation, and
innovations and 5 programs in the school
programs. Utilized 90-100% of the
classroom or school-based researches,
innovations, programs in school.

5.00
programs.

Capacitated the school personnel in Performed the first three Performed the indicators during
conducting research and innovation, indicators according to the to the target timeline and
and in designing and implementing approved cost, and without submission of accomplishment
✘
programs. compromising the report
Produced and approved the proposals implementation of other PAPs.
for research and innovation
(60-89% of the teachers)
Disseminated all or 60-89% of the
teacher researches, innovation, and
4 programs in the school
Utilized 60-89% of the classroom or
school-based researches, innovations,
programs in school.
5.00

Capacitated the school personnel in Performed the first two Performed the indicators during
conducting research and innovation, indicators according to the the target timeline and ✘
and in designing and implementing approved cost, and without submission
✘ of accomplishment
programs. compromising other PAPs. report
Produced and approved the
proposals for research and innovation
(30-59% of the teachers)
Disseminated all or 30-59% of the
3 teacher researches, innovation, and
programs in the school
Utilized 30-59% of the classroom or
school-based researches, innovations,
programs in school.

Capacitated only the school personnel Performed only one indicator Performed the indicators after
in conducting research and innovation, according to the approved cost, the approved timeline and
and in designing and implementing and without compromising other submission of accomplishment
2 programs. PAPs. report

No acceptable results and performance. No acceptable results and No acceptable results and
1 performance. performance.

3. Led in monitoring and Led the school community in reviewing Performed all the indicators Performed all the indicators Main Document(s)
evaluating programs for the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) according to the approved cost, before the target timeline and  School Monitoring, Evaluation, and
vis-a-vis SIP programs activities, and and without compromising submission of accomplishment Adjustment (SMEA) Reports
informed decision- projects to wit: implementation of other report.
making for continuous 4 strategies in gathering and organizing projects, activities, and programs Supporting Documents (Any of the
improvement and data in voice of the learners, and (PAPs). following)
promote learner conducting self-assessment. • Accomplished SIP M&E Plan
achievement Invited and presented for stakeholders’ •Other accomplished M&E tools
5 collaboration in addressing the gaps.
Adjusted the school plan according to
the recommendations of the school
community.

5.00
achievement

Led the school community in reviewing Performed the first three Performed the indicators
the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) indicators according to the during to the target timeline
vis-a-vis SIP programs activities, and approved cost, and without and submission of
projects to wit: 3 strategies in gathering compromising the accomplishment report
and organizing data in voice of the implementation of other PAPs.
learners, and conducting self-
4 assessment.

Invited and presented for stakeholders

5.00 collaboration in addressing the gaps.

✘ ✘

Led the school community in reviewing Performed the first two Performed the indicators
theey Performance Indicators (KPI) vis- indicators according to the during the target timeline and
a-vis SIP programs activities, and approved cost, and without submission of accomplishment
projects to wit: 2 strategies in gathering compromising other PAPs. report ✘
3 and organizing data in voice of the
learners, and conducting self-
assessment.

Implemented program reviews, Performed only one indicator

gathering and organizing data includingaccording to the approved cost,
voice of the learners, and conducting and without compromising other Performed the indicators after
2 self-assessment without the PAPs. the approved timeline and
engagement of the stakeholders’ submission of accomplishment
report
No acceptable results and performance. No acceptable results and
performance.
No acceptable results and
1 performance.
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Means of Verifcation (MOVs)
s
per
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES c
Objectiv BACK
o
e
r
e
BASIC KRA 2: Managing Formulated and Submitted regularly complete, Submitted complete, Main Documents
EDUCATION School Operation implemented a checking Submitted regularly 1. Accounting Report
accurate ,authentic accurate ,authentic
SERVICES and Resources mechanism to sustain complete, accurate, 2. Subsidiary ledger
liquidation reports with 0 liquidation reports 3
(20%) efficient and effective authentic liquidation
instance of return weeks before the end of 3. JEV
management of finances 5 reports with 100% 4. BAC Attendance, Pictorials , for BAC
the quarter
while adhering percentage of liquidation Meetings Upon Opening of RFQ
consistently to policies at the end of the fiscal
guidelines, and year
issuances in allocation ✘ ✘
procurement, Submitted regularly complete, Submitted regularly Submitted complete,
disbursement and accurate ,authentic complete, accurate, accurate ,authentic
liquidation aligned to liquidation reports with 0 authentic liquidation liquidation reports 2
the school plan. 4 instance of return reports wiith 98-99% weeks before the end of
percentage of liquidation the quarter
at the end of the fiscal
year
Submitted regularly complete, ✘ Submitted complete,
accurate ,authentic Submitted regularly accurate ,authentic
liquidation reports with 2 complete, accurate, liquidation reports on
instances of return authentic liquidation the last week of the
3 reports with 96-97% quarter
10.00 percentage of liquidation
at the end of the fiscal
year

Submitted regularly complete, Submitted complete,

accurate ,authentic Submitted regularly ✘
accurate ,authentic
liquidation reports with 3 complete, accurate, liquidation reports on
instances of return authentic liquidation the first week of the
2 reports with 94-95% succeeding quarter
percentage of liquidation
at the end of the fiscal
year

Submitted regularly complete, Submitted complete,

accurate ,authentic Submitted regularly accurate ,authentic
liquidation reports with 4 complete, accurate, liquidation reports on
instances of return authentic liquidation the second week of the
1 reports with 92-3% succeeding quarter
percentage of liquidation
at the end of the fiscal
year
Organized human 100% of the teachers were 100% of the teachers Classroom programs, Main Document:
resources with approved classroom with coordinatorships coordinatorships and 1. SF7
systematically and led program, coordinatorships and clubs designation clubs designation were Supporting Documents:
in the staffing of school and clubs designations with have an approved action approved 1month before *Approved Class Program *Clubs
programs, approved office orders plan and narrative the opening of classes Coordinatorship with Office Orders ,
organizations and reports.
others 5

85-99% of the teachers were 85-99% of the teachers Classroom programs,

with approved classroom with
✘ coordinatorships coordinatorships and
program, coordinatorships and clubs designation clubs designation were
and clubs designations with have an approved action approved 3 weeks beofre
4 approved office orders plan and narrative the opening of classes.
reports.

70-84% of the teachers were 70-84% of the teachers Classroom

✘
programs,
with approved classroom with coordinatorships coordinatorships and
program, coordinatorships and clubs designation clubs designation were
5.00
and clubs designations with have an approved action approved 2 week beofre
3 approved office orders plan and narrative the opening of classes.
reports.

55-69% of the teachers were 55-69% of the teachers Classroom programs,

with approved classroom with coordinatorships coordinatorships and
program, coordinatorships and clubs designation clubs designation were
and clubs designations with have an approved action approved 1 week before
2
approved office orders plan and narrative the opening of classes.
reports.

54% and below of the teachers 54% of the teachers with Classroom programs,
were with approved classroom coordinatorships and coordinatorships and
program, coordinatorships clubs designation have clubs designation were
and clubs designations with an approved action plan approved from the start
approved office orders and narrative reports. of the classes onwards
1

Managed school *Assessed the school facilities, *Presented safety Submitted approved Main Documents:
Facilities, Equipment equipments and safety measures result to the safety measures results 1. DRRM Accomplishment Report
and safety for disaster measures of the school Division DRRM Coor., to the Division DRRM, 2 NSBI (National School Building
preparedness, mitigation following the DRRM tool which LGU DRRM, BLGU, PTA, LGU DRRM, BLGU, Inventory )
and resiliency to ensure 5 includes, the earthquake SGC and other PTA, SGC and other 3. Records of school equipments and
continuous delivery of preparedness and other stakeholders and stakeholders 1 month utilization report.
instruction. calamity 1 month before the conducted 4 NSED or before the start of the Supporting Documents:
*Accomplished assessment Reports of
start of the class. other DRRM activities class.
DRRM
* Accomplished Report of the NSED
(Quarterly)
preparedness, mitigation Inventory )
and resiliency to ensure 3. Records of school equipments and
continuous delivery of utilization report.
instruction. Supporting Documents:
*Accomplished assessment Reports of
DRRM
* Accomplished Report of the NSED
*Assessed the school facilities, *Presented safety Submitted approved
✘ (Quarterly)
equipments and safety measures
✘
result to the safety measures results ✘
* Reports on Standard Health Protocols
measures of the school LGU DRRM, BLGU, PTA, to the Division DRRM, Implementation
following the DRRM tool which SGC and other LGU DRRM, BLGU, * Minutes of Meeting/Planning
4 includes the eaerthquake stakeholders and PTA, SGC and other
preparedness and other conducted 3 NSED or stakeholders 3 weeks
calamity 3 weeks before the other DRRM Activities before the start of the
start of the class. class.

*Assessed the school facilities, *Presented safety Submitted approved

equipments safety measures measures result to the safety measures results
of the school following the BLGU, PTA, SGC and to the Division DRRM,
DRRM tool which includes the other stakeholders and 2 LGU DRRM, BLGU,
3 eaerthquake preparedness NSED or other DRRM PTA, SGC and other
5.00
and other calamity 2 weeks Activities stakeholders 2 weeks
before the start of the class. before the start of the
class.

*Assessed the school facilities, *Presented safety Submitted approved

equipments and safety measures result to the safety measures results
measures of the school PTA, SGC and other to the Division DRRM,
following the DRRM tool which stakeholders and 1 LGU DRRM, BLGU,
2 includes the eaerthquake NSED or other DRRM PTA, SGC and other
preparedness and other activies stakeholders 1 week
calamity 1 week before the before the start of the
start of the class. class.

*Assessed the school facilites, *Presented safety Submitted approved

equipments and safety measures result to safety measures results
measures of the school teachers only and at to the Division DRRM,
following the DRRM tool which least 1 any DRRM LGU DRRM, BLGU,
1 includes the eaerthquake activity conducted. PTA, SGC and other
preparedness and other stakeholders days
calamity days before the start before the start of the
of the class. class.
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Means of Verifcation (MOVs)
s
per
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES c
Objectiv BACK
o
e
r
e
BASIC KRA 3: Focusing on Provided technical Provided TA on curriculum Provided TA to 100% of the Provided timely/immediate Non-negotiable Documents
EDUCATION Teaching and assistance to teachers on contextualization and teaching teachers at least twice a year TA to all teachers within the 1. Midyear Performance Monitoring and
SERVICES Learning (40%) curriculum standards and pedagogies to all with complete non-negotiable target period/as planned Coaching & Year-end Review Reports/
contextualization and teachers based on teachers needs as MOVs with at least one of the Monthly Report on Teachers Observed
teaching standards and 5 reflected in the approved LDNA and supporting documents in every and Given Assistance (TOGA) duly
pedagogies plans with 4 non-negotiable MOV signed by the teachers & periodically
documents monitored & approved by the PSDS
2. Instructional Supervisory Plan (ISP)
approved by SDO
Provided TA on curriculum Provided
✘ TA to 100% of the Provided TA to all teachers at 3. Accomplishment Report on the conduct
contextualization and teaching teachers at least twice a year most one-month delay from of LAC, INSET and other trainings for
standards and pedagogies to all with complete non-negotiable the target period as planned Professional Development initiated/led by
4 teachers based on teachers needs as MOVs with at least one of the the school head
reflected in the approved LDNA and supporting documents in every 4. Learning & Development Needs
plans with 3 non-negotiable MOV Analysis (LDNA) Report approved by
documents SDO with appropriate needs assessment
tools
✘ ✘
Provided TA on curriculum Provided TA to 100% of the Provided TA to all teachers at
Supporting Documents (Any of the
contextualization and teaching teachers at least twice a year most two-month delay from
following:)
standards and pedagogies to all with complete non-negotiable the target period as planned
teachers based on teachers needs as MOVs with at least one of the
• Samples of Accomplished Individual
3 reflected in the approved LDNA and supporting documents in every
Performance Monitoring and Coaching
plans with 2 non-negotiable MOV
15.00 Form (for MOV No.1)
documents
• Accomplished COT-RPMS Tools (for
MOV No.1)
• Samples of Individual Professional
Provided TA on curriculum Provided TA to 100% of the Provided
✘
TA to all teachers at Development Plan (for MOV No. 1)
contextualization and teaching teachers at least twice a year most three-month delay from • Attendance Sheets in the conduct of
standards and pedagogies to all with complete non-negotiable the target period as planned LAC sessions/Professional Development
teachers based on teachers needs as MOVs with at least one of the Training, etc. (for MOV No. 1 & 3)
2 reflected in the approved LDNA and supporting documents in every • Signed Teacher’s Individual
plans with 1 non-negotiable MOV Development Plan (for MOV No. 2)
document • Sample of accomplished Learning &
Development Needs Analysis (LDNA)
Tools developed (for MOV No. 4)
Provided TA on curriculum Provided TA to 100% of the Provided TA to all teachers • Others
contextualization and teaching teachers at least twice a year with four-or more months
standards and pedagogies to all with complete non-negotiable delay from the target period
teachers based on teachers needs as MOVs with at least one of the as planned
reflected in the approved LDNA and supporting documents in every
1 plans without non-negotiable MOV
documents but presented at least one
supporting document
Utilized the validated Utilized the validated learning Validated and utilized all Utilized the validated Non-negotiable Documents
learning outcomes outcomes required data in every quarter learning outcomes 1. Implementation Report on school’s
in developing data- in developing data-based and developed and after assessment within the data-based intervention(s) to maintain
based interventions on interventions with the provision of implemented at least one target period as planned learners’ achievement, assessment,
improving learner’s technical assistance to teachers in intervention/ innovation/ teachers’ performance and other
achievement and other using learning assessment tools, program with TA provided to performance indicators with positive
performance 5 strategies, and results to achieve all teachers result duly approved by the SDO
indicators higher learning outcomes with all 2. Complete Compilation of utilized and
non-negotiable signed/approved validated data on learning assessment
documents results, teachers’ performance feedback,
school KPIs, etc
3. Accomplishment Report reflecting the
validation and utilization of data on
Presented three non-negotiable Validated and utilized all Utilized the validated learning assessment and other
signed/approved documents required
✘
data in three quarters learning outcomes performance
✘
indicators duly approved by
only and developed and after assessment within the SDO
implemented at least one target period as planned 4. Midyear Performance Monitoring and
4 intervention/ /program Coaching & Year-end Review Reports/
innovation with TA provided Monthly Report on Teachers Observed
to all teachers and Given Assistance (TOGA) duly
signed by the teachers & periodically
monitored & approved by the PSDS
Presented two non-negotiable Validated and utilized all Utilized the validated
signed/approved documents required data in one quarter
✘
learning outcomes Supporting Documents (Any of these)
only and developed and after assessment within the
implemented at least one target period as planned • Concept paper of school’s
3 intervention/ innovation intervention/innovation/project developed
/program with TA provided to & proposed by the school duly approved
15.00 all teachers by SDO (for MOV No. 1)
• Sample accomplished tools for learners,
parents and teachers (for MOV No. 1 &
Presented one non-negotiable Validated and utilized all Utilized the validated 3)
signed/approved document required data in one quarter learning outcomes • Quarterly Analysis of KPIs (for MOV
only and developed and after assessment within the No. 2 & 3)
implemented at least one target period as planned • LIS-generated School Form 6 (for MOV
intervention/ innovation No. 1)
2 /program with TA provided to • School Report Card (for MOV No. 1-3)
all teachers • Sample accomplished assessment tools
for school intervention and learning proxy
indicators (summative written and
performance task-based, diagnostic,
reading, etc. (for MOV No. 1)
No non-negotiable document No validation and utilization of No validation and utilization • Accomplished COT-RPMS Tools (for
presented data gathered of data gathered MOV No.1)
and no intervention/ • Others
innovation developed

1
Ensured a learner- Implemented plans, monitored the The school is 91-100% CFSS Achieved and sustained the Non-negotiable Documents
friendly, inclusive, activities, and evaluated the & GEBS compliant and 91- objective in all quarters
motivating, and enabling implementation, and documented 100% of the classrooms are 1. Certificate of CFFS, GEBS & GEB-C
environment for CFSS with four authentic non- GEB-C certified compliance recognized at least at the
effective learning to 5 negotiable documents and at least district level across the four quarters
happen. one support document in every MOV 2. Quarterly Accomplishment Report on
compliance to GEBS and GEB-C
program
Implemented plans, monitored the The✘school is 76-90% CFSS & Achieved and sustained the 3. Fiscal Resources allocation,
activities, and evaluated the GEBS compliant and 76-90% objective in the second management and implementation report
implementation, and documented of the classrooms are GEB-C quarter for enabling, safe, motivating, learner-
CFSS with three authentic non- certified friendly and engaging learning
4 negotiable documents and at least environment
one support document in every MOV 4. Implementation Report of School
intervention(s)/ innovation (s)/project(s)
on establishing an enabling, safe,
motivating, learner-friendly and engaging
learning environment
Implemented plans, monitored the The school is 51-75% CFSS & Achieved
✘ and sustained the ✘
activities, and evaluated the GEBS compliant and 51-75% objective in the third quarter Supporting documents (Any of these):
implementation, and documented of the classrooms are GEB-C
CFSS with two authentic non- certifiedrs. • Sample of accomplished evaluation tool,
3 negotiable documents and at least Evaluation report (for MOV No. 1 &2)
one support document in every MOV • Validated CFSS Rating in the district
10.00 level (for MOV No. 2)
• Concept paper of
intervention/innovation/ project
Implemented plans, monitored the The school is 26-50% CFSS & Achieved and sustained the developed/proposed by the school head
activities, and evaluated the GEBS compliant and 26-50% objective in the fourth quarter duly approved by SDO (for MOV No. 4)
implementation, and documented of the classrooms are GEB-C • Documents showing partnerships with
CFSS with one authentic non- certified stakeholders (for MOV No. 1&2)
2 negotiable documents and at least • Financial Reports/Subsidiary Ledger
one support document in every MOV (for MOV No. 3)
• School Improvement Plan (SIP)
reflecting the targets for ensuring a
learner-friendly, inclusive, motivating,
and enabling environment
Implemented, monitored, without The school is 25% or less Objective not achieved within
• Others
any MOV CFSS & GEBS compliant and the rating periods
25% or less of the classrooms
are GEB-C certified

1
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Means of Verifcation (MOVs)
s
per
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES c
Objectiv BACK
o
e
r
e
BASIC KRA 4: Developing Set personal and Main Documents: 1.
EDUCATION Self and Others professional 100% of teaching and non-teaching School Plan for Professional
personnel accomplished SAT and Submitted at least 4 documents 100% RPMS Cycle timeline is
SERVICES (10%) development goals 5 developed Individual Development as stated followed
Development
based on self- plan (IDP) 2. INSET , LAC and Coaching
assessment aligned Implementation Plan
✘ ✘ ✘ Supporting Documents:
96-99 % of teaching and non-teaching
•Reflection
Submitted at least 3 documents RPMS Cycle timeline is Journal ,
4 personnel accomplished SAT and
as stated conducted 2 weeks delayed •Portfolio (sample only)
developed IDP.

91-95% of teaching and non-teaching

Submitted at least 2 documents RPMS Cycle timeline is
3.00 3 personnel accomplished SAT and as stated conducted 3 weeks delayed
developed IDP

86-90% of teaching and non-teaching

Submitted at least 1 documents RPMS Cycle timeline is
2 personnel accomplished SAT and as stated conducted 4 weeks delayed
developed IDP.

85 AND BELOW% of teaching and non-

No acceptable evidence was RPMS Cycle timeline is
1 teaching personnel accomplished SAT shown conducted 5 weeks delayed
and developed IDP.

Engaged actively in 100% of the school personnel 100% of the planned INSET or 100% LAC and INSET and other Main Documents:
professional networks participated professional networks and LAC were conducted. PD activities were conducted as 1. Accomplishment Report of Trainings/LAC
performance management and scheduled. Sessions Conducted (Minutes, pictures)
within and across 5 leadership development 2. PMCF for school
schools. heads/MTs
3. Summary of IPCRF Rating
90-99% of the school personnel 90-99%
✘ of the planned INSET or 90-99%%
✘ LAC and INSET were ✘ 4. School
participated professional networks and LAC were conducted. conducted as scheduled. Head's Certificate of participation to a
performance management and Training or short course or Certificate of
4 leadership development recognition as resource speaker
Supporting Documents:
• ID/Certificate of Membership to any
professional organization
80-89% of the school personnel 80-89% of the planned INSET or 80-89% LAC and INSET were • Pictures/ Documentation of RPMS
participated professional networks and LAC were conducted. conducted as scheduled. Cycle •
performance management and Study Permits and TOR (if graduated or
4.00 3 leadership development CAR) of the current year •
Summarized form of trainings/short
courses/conferences attended/participated
by the personnel (Categorized by level)
70-79% of the school personnel 70-79% of the planned INSET or 70-79% LAC and INSET were
participated professional networks and LAC were conducted. conducted as scheduled.
performance management and
2 leadership development
 Summarized form of trainings/short
courses/conferences attended/participated
by the personnel (Categorized by level)

10-69% of the school 10-69% of the planned INSET or 10-69% LAC and INSET were
personnelparticipated professional LAC were conducted. conducted as scheduled.
networks and performance
1 management and leadership
development

Initiated teacher’s 100% of the teachers general welfare Submitted all Non-negotiable Main Documents:
general welfare and and work accomplishments were and negotiable documents. • Contextualized School Rewarding
recognized System Policy and Implementation
implement school (Attachments: Pictures, list of awardees, etc.)
rewarding system NEGOTIABLE
5
• List of teachers recommended for
promotion,
• list of endorsed teachers to higher
✘ awards and recognition and/or scholarship
grants. • list of
81-90% of the teachers general welfare Submitted at least 3 non- ✘ teachers promoted
and work accomplishments were negotiable and any of the • List of awards received by employees
recognized negotiable documents as stated within the school year
4 • Compilation of Maternity/Paternity Leaves
(if any) and service credits availed within the
year.

3.00 71-80% of the teachers general welfare Submitted at least 2 and any of
and work accomplishments were the negotiable documents as
recognized stated
3

61-70% of the teachers general welfare Submitted at least 1 and any of

and work accomplishments were the negotiable documents as
recognized stated
2

50-60% of the teachers general welfare No acceptable evidence was

and work accomplishments were shown
1 recognized
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Means of Verifcation (MOVs)
s
per
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES c
Objectiv BACK
o
e
r
e
BASIC KRA 5: Building 1. Managed diverse Non-negotiable Documents
EDUCATION Connections (10%) relationships to sustain
SERVICES an enabling and Established Partnerships with 5 school 1. By-Laws of PTA, Faculty Club and
Partnered 5 stakeholders
supportive environment stakeholders through
supported with MOV1-5 each and Updated DPDS / Inventory SSG
for learners. 5 ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/WinS, etc. and
generated resources based on Report monthly 2. Annual Work Plans
others and generated resources based 3. Minutes of the Meeting with
the scoring matrix
on school's category.
Attendance
4. Approved MOU/MOA/Pledge of
Commitment
✘ ✘ 5.✘ Accomplishment Report with Pictures
Established Partnerships with 4 school (at least 2 pages)
Partnered 4 stakeholders Other acceptable
stakeholders through
supported with MOV 1-5 eac and Updated DPDS / Inventory
4 ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/WinS etc. and others
generated resources based on Report bi-monthly
MOVs: *Sample Certificates of
and generated resources based on
the scoring matrix Recognition, *SOSA and/or SMEA
school's category. Reports * Letter of Invitation to
stakeholders * Other proof of
engagement (Attendance to Programs and
other activities)

Established Partnerships with 3 school

Partnered 3 stakeholders
stakeholders through
supported with MOV 1-5 each Updated DPDS / Inventory
3 ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/WinS etc. and others
and generated resources based Report quarterly
and generated resources based on
5.00 on the scoring matrix
school's category.

Established Partnerships with 2 school

Partnered 2 stakeholders
stakeholders through
supported with MOV 1-5 each Updated DPDS / Inventory
2 ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/WinS etc. and others and generated resources based Report by semester
and generated resources based on
on the scoring matrix
school's category.

Established Partnerships with 1school

Partnered 1 stakeholder
stakeholders through
supported with MOV 1-5 and Updated DPDS / Inventory
1 ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/WinS etc. and others
generated resources based on Report annually
and generated resources based on
the scoring matrix
school's category.

2. Initiated a culture of Main Documents:

inclusivity in the school 1. Approved School GAD Plan/School
and the community Initiated and conducted 5 Activities IPEd Plan/ALIVE Plan
related to gender sensitivity, physical Facilitated 5 activities supported
5 and mental health awareness, and with MOV 1-5 each. 2. Accomplishment Reports
culture responsiveness 3. Attendance
4. Photos
5. Certificate of Recognition or
✘ ✘ Participation
2. Initiated a culture of Main Documents:
inclusivity in the school 1. Approved School GAD Plan/School
and the community IPEd Plan/ALIVE Plan
2. Accomplishment Reports
3. Attendance
4. Photos
5. Certificate of Recognition or
✘ ✘ Participation

Initiated and conducted 4 Activities

4 related to gender sensitivity, physical
and mental health awareness, and
Facilitated 4 activities supported
with MOV 1-5 each.
culture responsiveness

2.50
Initiated and conducted 3 Activities
related to gender sensitivity, physical Facilitated 3 activities supported
3 and mental health awareness, and with MOV 1-5 each.
culture responsiveness

Initiated and conducted 2 Activities

related to gender sensitivity, physical Facilitated 2 activities supported
2 and mental health awareness, and with MOV 1-5 each.
culture responsiveness

Initiated and conducted 1 Activity

related to gender sensitivity, physical Facilitated 1 activity supported
1 and mental health awareness, and with MOV 1-5.
culture responsiveness

3. Established 1. Accomplishment Reports with photos

Community (at least 2 pages)
Engagement and Established Partnerships with 5 school 2. Deed of Donations or Certification /
Partnered 5 stakeholders
Partnerships stakeholders through IGPs
supported with MOV1-5 each and Updated DPDS / Inventory
5 ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/WinS, etc. and
generated resources based on Report monthly 3. Printed copies of DPDS / Financial
others and generated resources based
the scoring matrix Reports
on school's category.
4. Inventory of Donated Resources or
✘
✘
Projects / Project Acceptance
✘

5. Awards and Recognitions Received

Established Partnerships with 4 school

Partnered 4 stakeholders
stakeholders through
supported with MOV 1-5 eac and Updated DPDS / Inventory
4 ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/WinS etc. and others generated resources based on Report bi-monthly
and generated resources based on
the scoring matrix
school's category.

Established Partnerships with 3 school

Partnered 3 stakeholders
stakeholders through
supported with MOV 1-5 each Updated DPDS / Inventory
3 ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/WinS etc. and others
and generated resources based Report quarterly
2.50 and generated resources based on
on the scoring matrix
school's category.

Established Partnerships with 2 school

Partnered 2 stakeholders
stakeholders through
supported with MOV 1-5 each Updated DPDS / Inventory
2 ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/WinS etc. and others
and generated resources based Report by semester
and generated resources based on
on the scoring matrix
school's category.
 Established Partnerships with 1school
Partnered 1 stakeholder
stakeholders through
supported with MOV 1-5 and Updated DPDS / Inventory
1 ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/WinS etc. and others
generated resources based on Report annually
and generated resources based on
the scoring matrix
school's category.

Scoring Matix on Resources Generated

*Small and Medium (ES/HS) *E/S and Sec *E/S and Sec
5 400,000.00 and above 500,000.00 and above 600,000.00 and above
4 300,000.00 - 399,999.00 400,000.00 - 499,000.00 500,000.00 - 599,999.00
3 200,000.00 - 299,999.00 300,000.00 - 399,999.00 400,000.00 - 499,000.00
2 100,000.00 - 199,999.00 200,000.00 - 299,999.00 300,000.00 - 399,999.00
1 99,999.00 and below 199,999.00 and below 299,999.00 and below
 OBJECTIVES MEANS OF VERIFICATION (MOVs)
BACK

1. Coordinatorship at
District/Division Office Orders, Action Plan, and Accomplishment Report
Levels
✘

2. Technical
Official/Member of
Memorandum, Certificate of Appearance/Certificate of Recognition/Certificate of Participation, and Pictures
Division or
Regional Activity ✘

3. Winner in a
Contest/Competition/ District Level or Higher
Search
✘

4. Awardee as a School
First Place at the District Level
Head

5.
Speaker/Resource District Level or Higher
Speaker
✘

6. Research Presenter in Research Forum or Published in a Journal

7. Author of a
published book
✘

8. Quality
Assurance Member
in
Division/Regional ✘
Level

9. Innovation
adopted at least in
the District Level
✘

10. Other functions

performed at least
at the Division
Level outside
regular functions. ✘
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
KRA 1 Leading 1. Formulated 1. Approved School Produced all 0 Delivers the school
Strategically transitional Improvement Plan (SIP) necessary documents plans and policies
(15%) framework for school 2. Approved School BE-LCP for the school plans, with high quality and
plans, policies, and Supporting policies, and produced quarterly
implementation vis-à- Documents implementation with reports on the
vis vision, mission, •Documentations on the full support of conduct of MOVs.
and core values of conduct of SMEA and other 5 internal & external
DepEd school plans related to policy stakeholders and
reviews and implementations with complete 1 to 5
• Duly received MOVs
communication to
stakeholders and School
Planning Team for policy
review formulation and Produced necessary 0 Provides the school
implementation and SMEA documents for the plans and policies
including minutes of the school plans, policies, with high quality
meeting and attendance sheets. and implementation work and produced
• Accomplishment reports on with predominantly MOVs in 3 quarters
the planning policy reviews, support of internal & out of 4.
implementations, SMEA 4 external stakeholders
and with 4 out of 5
MOVs.

5.00 8 4 0.20

BULLS 17
 plans, policies, and Supporting
implementation vis-à- Documents
vis vision, mission, •Documentations on the
and core values of conduct of SMEA and other
DepEd school plans related to policy
reviews and implementations
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
• Duly received
communication to
ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD
Name of Employee:
stakeholders and School
Position: School Principal-I
Planning Team for policy Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022
review formulation and Date of Review: 04/22/2022
implementation
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division and SMEA
of Bukidnon
including minutes of the
School Year: 2021-2022
meeting and attendance sheets.
• Accomplishment reports on
the planning policy reviews, TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
implementations, SMEA
Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Produced most of the 0 Delivers the school
5.00 8 4 0.20
documents needed plans and policies
for the school plans, required and
policies, and produced MOVs in 2
implementation with quarters only out of
the limited support 4.
3 of the internal and
external stakeholders
with 3 out of 5
MOVs.

Produced only 2 out 0 Frequently delivers

of 5 necessary the school plans and
documents for the policies and produced
2 school plans, policies, MOVs only 1 out of 4
and implementation. quarters.

Produced only 1 0 The school plans and

document out of 5 for policies lack the
the school plans, necessary documents
1 policies, and to support its
implementation implementation.

BULLS 18
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
2. Established Main Documents: Capacitated the Performed all the Performed all the
systematic practices  Approved Training Design school personnel in indicators according indicators before the
in capacitating school or LAC Plan and conducting research to the approved cost, target timeline and
personnel, research Accomplishment Report and innovation, and and without submission of
productivity and  Approved Research in designing and compromising accomplishment
dissemination, and Proposals implementing implementation of report.
utilization of  Reports for the utilized programs. other projects,
innovations and research findings activities, and
programs. Produced and programs (PAPs).
approved the
proposals for
research and
innovation
(90%-100%
teachers)
5
Disseminated 90-
100% of the teacher
researches,
innovation, and
programs in the
school

Utilized 90-100% of
the classroom or
school-based
researches,
innovations,
programs in school.

BULLS 19
 programs.

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Capacitated the Performed the first Performed the
school personnel in three indicators indicators during to
conducting research according to the the target timeline
and innovation, and approved cost, and and submission of
in designing and without accomplishment
implementing compromising the report
programs. implementation of
other PAPs.
Produced and
approved the
proposals for
research and
innovation
(60-89% of the
teachers)
4 Disseminated
all or 60-89% of the
teacher researches,
innovation, and
programs in the
school
Utilized 60-89%
5.00 of the classroom or 13 4.333333333 0.22
school-based
researches,
innovations,
programs in school.

BULLS 20
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

5.00BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

TO 13 4.333333333 0.22

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Capacitated the Performed the first Performed the
school personnel in two indicators indicators during the
conducting research according to the target timeline and
and innovation, and approved cost, and submission of
in designing and without accomplishment
implementing compromising other report
programs. PAPs.

Produced and
approved the
proposals for
research and
innovation
(30-59% of the
teachers)
3 Disseminated
all or 30-59% of the
teacher researches,
innovation, and
programs in the
school
Utilized 30-59%
of the classroom or
school-based
researches,
innovations,
programs in school.

BULLS 21
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Capacitated only the Performed only one Performed the
school personnel in indicator according indicators after the
conducting research to the approved cost, approved timeline
and innovation, and and without and submission of
in designing and compromising other accomplishment
2 implementing PAPs. report
programs.

No acceptable results No acceptable results No acceptable results

and performance. and performance. and performance.
1

BULLS 22
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
3. Led in monitoring Main Document(s) Led the school Performed all the Performed all the
and evaluating  School Monitoring, community in indicators according indicators before the
programs for Evaluation, and Adjustment reviewing the Key to the approved cost, target timeline and
informed decision- (SMEA) Reports Performance and without submission of
making for Indicators (KPI) vis- compromising accomplishment
continuous Supporting Documents (Any a-vis SIP programs implementation of report.
improvement and of the following) activities, and other projects,
promote learner • Accomplished SIP M&E projects to wit: activities, and
achievement Plan 4 strategies in programs (PAPs).
•Other accomplished M&E gathering and
tools organizing data in
voice of the learners,
and conducting self-
5 assessment.
Invited and
presented for
stakeholders’
collaboration in
addressing the gaps.
Adjusted the school
plan according to the
recommendations of
the school
community.

BULLS 23
 continuous Supporting Documents (Any
improvement and of the following)
promote learner • Accomplished SIP M&E
achievement Plan
•Other accomplished M&EPERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
OFFICE
tools
Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD
Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Led the school Performed the first Performed the
community in three indicators indicators during to
reviewing the Key according to the the target timeline
Performance approved cost, and and submission of
Indicators (KPI) vis- without accomplishment
a-vis SIP programs compromising the report
activities, and implementation of
projects to wit: 3 other PAPs.
strategies in
gathering and
organizing data in
voice of the learners,
4 and conducting self-
assessment.

5.00 Invited and 13 4.333333333 0.22

presented for
stakeholders
collaboration in
addressing the gaps.

BULLS 24
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022
5.00 13 4.333333333 0.22
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Led the school Performed the first Performed the
community in two indicators indicators during the
reviewing theey according to the target timeline and
Performance approved cost, and submission of
Indicators (KPI) vis- without accomplishment
a-vis SIP programs compromising other report
activities, and PAPs.
projects to wit: 2
3 strategies in
gathering and
organizing data in
voice of the learners,
and conducting self-
assessment.

Implemented Performed only one Performed the

program reviews, indicator according indicators after the
gathering and to the approved cost, approved timeline
organizing data and without and submission of
including voice of the compromising other accomplishment
learners, and PAPs. report
2 conducting self-
assessment without
the engagement of
the stakeholders’

No acceptable results No acceptable results No acceptable results

1 and performance. and performance. and performance.

BULLS 25
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
KRA 2: Managing Formulated and Main Documents Submitted regularly Submitted regularly Submitted complete,
School Operation implemented a 1. Accounting complete, complete, accurate, accurate ,authentic
and Resources checking mechanism Report 2. accurate ,authentic authentic liquidation liquidation reports 3
(20%) to sustain efficient Subsidiary ledger liquidation reports reports with 100% weeks before the end
5
and effective 3. JEV with 0 instance of percentage of of the quarter
management of 4. BAC return liquidation at the end
finances while Attendance, Pictorials , for of the fiscal year
adhering consistently BAC Meetings Upon Opening
to policies guidelines, of RFQ Submitted regularly Submitted regularly Submitted complete,
and issuances in complete, complete, accurate, accurate ,authentic
allocation accurate ,authentic authentic liquidation liquidation reports 2
procurement, liquidation reports reports wiith 98-99% weeks before the end
disbursement and 4
with 0 instance of percentage of of the quarter
liquidation aligned to return liquidation at the end
the school plan. of the fiscal year

Submitted regularly Submitted regularly Submitted complete,

complete, complete, accurate, accurate ,authentic
accurate ,authentic authentic liquidation liquidation reports on
liquidation reports reports with 96-97% the last week of the
10.00 3 with 2 instances of percentage of quarter 12 4 0.40
return liquidation at the end
of the fiscal year

Submitted regularly Submitted regularly Submitted complete,

complete, complete, accurate, accurate ,authentic
accurate ,authentic authentic liquidation liquidation reports on
liquidation reports reports with 94-95% the first week of the
2 with 3 instances of percentage of succeeding quarter
return liquidation at the end
of the fiscal year

BULLS 26
 procurement,
disbursement and
liquidation aligned to
the school plan.
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 10.00 Date of Review: 04/22/2022 12 4 0.40
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Submitted regularly Submitted regularly Submitted complete,
complete, complete, accurate, accurate ,authentic
accurate ,authentic authentic liquidation liquidation reports on
liquidation reports reports with 92-3% the second week of
1 with 4 instances of percentage of the succeeding
return liquidation at the end quarter
of the fiscal year

Organized human Main Document: 100% of the teachers 100% of the teachers Classroom programs,
resources 1. SF7 were with approved with coordinatorships coordinatorships and
systematically and led classroom program, and clubs designation clubs designation
in the staffing of Supporting Documents: coordinatorships and have an approved were approved
school programs, *Approved Class Program 5 clubs designations action plan and 1month before the
organizations and *Clubs Coordinatorship with with approved office narrative reports. opening of classes
others Office Orders , orders

85-99% of the 85-99% of the teachers Classroom programs,

teachers were with with coordinatorships coordinatorships and
approved classroom and clubs designation clubs designation
program, have an approved were approved 3
4 coordinatorships and action plan and weeks beofre the
clubs designations narrative reports. opening of classes.
with approved office
orders

5.00 13 4.333333333 0.22

BULLS 27
 Organized human Main Document:
resources 1. SF7 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
systematically and led
in the staffing of Supporting Documents:
Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD
school programs, *Approved Class Program
Position: organizations and School Principal-I
*Clubs Coordinatorship with Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period:
others 4/22/2022
Office Orders , Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
70-84% of the 70-84% of the teachers Classroom programs,
teachers were with with coordinatorships coordinatorships and
approved classroom and clubs designation clubs designation
program, have an approved were approved 2
5.00 3 coordinatorships and action plan and week beofre the 13 4.333333333 0.22
clubs designations narrative reports. opening of classes.
with approved office
orders

55-69% of the 55-69% of the teachers Classroom programs,

teachers were with with coordinatorships coordinatorships and
approved classroom and clubs designation clubs designation
program, have an approved were approved 1
2 coordinatorships and action plan and week before the
clubs designations narrative reports. opening of classes.
with approved office
orders

54% and below of the 54% of the teachers Classroom programs,

teachers were with with coordinatorships coordinatorships and
approved classroom and clubs designation clubs designation
program, have an approved were approved from
1 coordinatorships and action plan and the start of the classes
clubs designations narrative reports. onwards
with approved office
orders

BULLS 28
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Managed school Main Documents: *Assessed the school *Presented safety Submitted approved
Facilities, Equipment 1. DRRM facilities, equipments measures result to the safety measures
and safety for disaster Accomplishment Report and safety measures of Division DRRM results to the Division
preparedness, 2 NSBI (National School the school following Coor., LGU DRRM, DRRM, LGU
mitigation and Building Inventory ) the DRRM tool which BLGU, PTA, SGC and DRRM, BLGU, PTA,
resiliency to ensure 3. includes, the other stakeholders and SGC and other
continuous delivery Records of school equipments 5 earthquake conducted 4 NSED or stakeholders 1 month
of instruction. and utilization report. preparedness and other other DRRM activities before the start of the
Supporting calamity 1 month class.
Documents: before the start of the
*Accomplished assessment class.
Reports of DRRM
*
Accomplished Report of the *Assessed the school *Presented safety Submitted approved
NSED (Quarterly) facilities, equipments measures result to the safety measures
* Reports on and safety measures of LGU DRRM, BLGU, results to the Division
Standard Health Protocols the school following PTA, SGC and other DRRM, LGU
Implementation the DRRM tool which stakeholders and DRRM, BLGU, PTA,
* Minutes of includes the conducted 3 NSED or SGC and other
Meeting/Planning 4 eaerthquake other DRRM stakeholders 3 weeks
preparedness and other Activities before the start of the
calamity 3 weeks class.
before the start of the
class.

5.00 15 5 0.25

BULLS 29
 mitigation and Building Inventory )
resiliency to ensure 3.
continuous delivery Records of school equipments
of instruction. and utilization report.
Supporting
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Documents:
*Accomplished assessment
Name of Employee: ALMA
Reports O. VALLESCAS
of DRRM Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD
Position: School Principal-I * Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: Accomplished
4/22/2022 Report of the Date of Review: 04/22/2022
NSED (Quarterly)
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
* Reports on
School Year: 2021-2022
Standard Health Protocols
Implementation
* Minutes of TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
Meeting/Planning
Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
*Assessed the school *Presented safety Submitted approved
facilities, equipments measures result to the safety measures
safety measures of the BLGU, PTA, SGC and results to the Division
school following the other stakeholders and DRRM, LGU
DRRM tool which 2 NSED or other DRRM, BLGU, PTA,
includes the DRRM Activities SGC and other
5.00 3 eaerthquake stakeholders 2 weeks 15 5 0.25
preparedness and other before the start of the
calamity 2 weeks class.
before the start of the
class.

*Assessed the school *Presented safety Submitted approved

facilities, equipments measures result to the safety measures
and safety measures of PTA, SGC and other results to the Division
the school following stakeholders and 1 DRRM, LGU
the DRRM tool which NSED or other DRRM DRRM, BLGU, PTA,
includes the activies SGC and other
2 eaerthquake stakeholders 1 week
preparedness and other before the start of the
calamity 1 week class.
before the start of the
class.

BULLS 30
 5.00 15 5 0.25

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
*Assessed the school *Presented safety Submitted approved
facilites, equipments measures result to safety measures
and safety measures of teachers only and at results to the Division
the school following least 1 any DRRM DRRM, LGU
the DRRM tool which activity conducted. DRRM, BLGU, PTA,
includes the SGC and other
1 eaerthquake stakeholders days
preparedness and other before the start of the
calamity days before class.
the start of the class.

KRA 3: Focusing Provided technical Non-negotiable Documents Provided TA on Provided TA to 100% Provided
on Teaching and assistance to teachers 1. Midyear Performance curriculum of the teachers at least timely/immediate TA
Learning (40%) on curriculum Monitoring and Coaching & contextualization and twice a year with to all teachers within
contextualization and Year-end Review Reports/ teaching standards and complete non- the target period/as
teaching standards Monthly Report on Teachers pedagogies to all negotiable MOVs with planned
and pedagogies Observed and Given teachers based on at least one of the
Assistance (TOGA) duly teachers needs as supporting documents
5
signed by the teachers & reflected in the in every MOV
periodically monitored & approved LDNA and
approved by the PSDS plans with 4 non-
2. Instructional Supervisory negotiable documents
Plan (ISP) approved by SDO
3. Accomplishment Report on
the conduct of LAC, INSET
and other trainings for
Professional Development
initiated/led by the school
head
4. Learning & Development
Needs Analysis (LDNA)
Report approved by SDO with
appropriate needs assessment
tools
BULLS 31 Supporting Documents (Any
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: Provided technical
KRA 3: Focusing School Principal-I
Non-negotiable Documents Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review
on Teaching and Period: 4/22/2022
assistance to teachers 1. Midyear Performance Date of Review: 04/22/2022
LearningBureau/Center/Service/Division:Division
(40%) on curriculum Monitoring of and Coaching &
Bukidnon
contextualization and Year-end Review Reports/
School Year:
teaching standards 2021-2022
Monthly Report on Teachers
and pedagogies Observed and Given
Assistance (TOGA) duly TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
signed by the teachers &
periodically monitored &
approved by the PSDS
Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES 2. Instructional Supervisory ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
Plan (ISP) approved by SDO RESULT
(%) r
3. Accomplishment Report on
the conduct of LAC, INSET e
and other trainings for Provided TA on Provided TA to 100% Provided TA to all
Professional Development curriculum of the teachers at least teachers at most one-
initiated/led by the school contextualization and twice a year with month delay from the
head teaching standards and complete non- target period as
4. Learning & Development pedagogies to all negotiable MOVs with planned
Needs Analysis (LDNA) teachers based on at least one of the
Report approved by SDO with 4 teachers needs as supporting documents
appropriate needs assessment reflected in the in every MOV
tools approved LDNA and
Supporting Documents (Any plans with 3 non-
of the following:) negotiable documents

• Samples of Accomplished
Individual Performance Provided TA on Provided TA to 100% Provided TA to all
Monitoring and Coaching curriculum of the teachers at least teachers at most two-
Form (for MOV No.1) contextualization and twice a year with month delay from the
• Accomplished COT-RPMS teaching standards and complete non- target period as
Tools (for MOV No.1) pedagogies to all negotiable MOVs with planned
• Samples of Individual 15.00 teachers based on at least one of the 11 3.666666667 0.55
Professional Development 3 teachers needs as supporting documents
Plan (for MOV No. 1) reflected in the in every MOV
• Attendance Sheets in the approved LDNA and
conduct of LAC plans with 2 non-
sessions/Professional negotiable documents
Development Training, etc.
(for MOV No. 1 & 3)
• Signed Teacher’s Individual Provided TA on Provided TA to 100% Provided TA to all
Development Plan (for MOV curriculum of the teachers at least teachers at most three-
No. 2) contextualization and twice a year with month delay from the
• Sample of accomplished teaching standards and complete non- target period as
2 pedagogies to all negotiable MOVs with planned
Learning & Development
Needs Analysis (LDNA) teachers based on at least one of the
Tools developed (for MOV teachers needs as supporting documents
No. 4) reflected in the in every MOV
• Others approved LDNA and
plans with 1 non-
negotiable document
BULLS 32
 • Samples of Accomplished
Individual Performance
Monitoring and Coaching
Form (for MOV No.1)
• Accomplished OFFICE
COT-RPMS PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Tools (for MOV No.1)
• Samples of Individual 15.00 11 3.666666667 0.55
Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS
Professional Development Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD
Position: School
Plan (forPrincipal-I
MOV No. 1) Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: • Attendance
4/22/2022 Sheets in the Date of Review: 04/22/2022
conduct ofofLAC
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division Bukidnon
sessions/Professional
School Year: 2021-2022
Development Training, etc.
(for MOV No. 1 & 3)
• Signed Teacher’s Individual TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
Development Plan (for MOV
No. 2)
• Sample of accomplished
Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES Learning & Development ACTUAL
VERIFICATION
Needs (MOVs) Objective o
Analysis (LDNA) RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
Tools developed (for MOV r
No. 4) e
• Others Provided TA on Provided TA to 100% Provided TA to all
curriculum of the teachers at least teachers with four-or
contextualization and twice a year with more months delay
teaching standards and complete non- from the target period
pedagogies to all negotiable MOVs with as planned
teachers based on at least one of the
teachers needs as supporting documents
reflected in the in every MOV
1 approved LDNA and
plans without non-
negotiable documents
but presented at least
one supporting
document

BULLS 33
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Utilized the validated Non-negotiable Documents Utilized the validated Validated and utilized Utilized the validated
learning outcomes 1. Implementation Report on learning outcomes all required data in learning outcomes
in developing data- school’s data-based in developing data- every quarter and after assessment within
based interventions intervention(s) to maintain based interventions developed and the target period as
on improving learners’ achievement, with the provision of implemented at least planned
learner’s achievement assessment, teachers’ technical assistance to one intervention/
and other performance and other teachers in using innovation/ program
performance performance indicators with learning assessment with TA provided to
indicators positive result duly approved tools, strategies, and all teachers
by the SDO results to achieve
2. Complete Compilation of higher learning
utilized and validated data on 5 outcomes with all non-
learning assessment results, negotiable
teachers’ performance signed/approved
feedback, school KPIs, etc documents
3. Accomplishment Report
reflecting the validation and
utilization of data on learning
assessment and other
performance indicators duly
approved by SDO
4. Midyear Performance
Monitoring and Coaching &
Year-end Review Reports/
Monthly Report on Teachers
Observed and Given
Assistance (TOGA) duly
signed by the teachers &
periodically monitored &
approved by the PSDS

Supporting Documents (Any

of these)

• Concept paper of school’s

intervention/innovation/projec 15.00 14 4.67 0.70
BULLS 34
t developed & proposed by the
 learning outcomes 1. Implementation Report on
in developing data- school’s data-based
based interventions intervention(s) to maintain
on improving learners’ achievement,
learner’s achievement assessment, teachers’
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
and other performance and other
performance performance indicators with
Name of Employee:
indicators ALMA
positive O. VALLESCAS
result duly approved Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD
Position: School Principal-I
by the SDO Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 2. Complete
4/22/2022 Compilation of Date of Review: 04/22/2022
utilized and
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division validated data on
of Bukidnon
learning assessment results,
School Year: 2021-2022
teachers’ performance
feedback, school KPIs, etc
3. Accomplishment Report TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
reflecting the validation and
utilization of data on learning
assessment and other Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES performance indicators duly ACTUAL
VERIFICATION
approved by SDO (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
4. Midyear Performance r
Monitoring and Coaching & e
Year-end Review Reports/ Presented three non- Validated and utilized Utilized the validated
Monthly Report on Teachers negotiable all required data in learning outcomes
Observed and Given signed/approved three quarters only and after assessment within
Assistance (TOGA) duly documents developed and the target period as
signed by the teachers & implemented at least planned
periodically monitored & one intervention/
approved by the PSDS /program innovation
4 with TA provided to
Supporting Documents (Any all teachers
of these)

• Concept paper of school’s

intervention/innovation/projec 15.00 14 4.67 0.70
t developed & proposed by the
school duly approved by SDO
(for MOV No. 1) Presented two non- Validated and utilized Utilized the validated
• Sample accomplished tools negotiable all required data in one learning outcomes
for learners, parents and signed/approved quarter only and after assessment within
teachers (for MOV No. 1 & 3) documents developed and the target period as
• Quarterly Analysis of KPIs implemented at least planned
3 one intervention/
(for MOV No. 2 & 3)
• LIS-generated School Form innovation /program
6 (for MOV No. 1) with TA provided to
• School Report Card (for all teachers
MOV No. 1-3)
• Sample accomplished
assessment tools for school
intervention and learning
proxy indicators (summative
written and performance task-
based, diagnostic, reading, etc.
(for MOV No. 1)
• Accomplished COT-RPMS
Tools (for MOV No.1)
• Others

BULLS 35
 Assistance (TOGA) duly
signed by the teachers &
periodically monitored &
approved by the PSDS
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Supporting Documents (Any
of these)
Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD
Position: School Principal-I
• Concept paper of school’s Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
intervention/innovation/projec 15.00 14 4.67 0.70
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
t developed
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division & proposed by the
of Bukidnon
school duly approved by SDO
School Year: 2021-2022
(for MOV No. 1)
• Sample accomplished tools
for learners, parents and TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
teachers (for MOV No. 1 & 3)
• Quarterly Analysis of KPIs
(for MOV No. 2 & 3) Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES • LIS-generated School Form ACTUAL
6 VERIFICATION
(for MOV No. 1) (MOVs) Objective o RESULT
RATING SCORE
• School Report Card (for (%) r
MOV No. 1-3) e
• Sample accomplished Presented one non- Validated and utilized Utilized the validated
assessment tools for school negotiable all required data in one learning outcomes
intervention and learning signed/approved quarter only and after assessment within
proxy indicators (summative document developed and the target period as
written and performance task- implemented at least planned
based, diagnostic, reading, etc. one intervention/
(for MOV No. 1) innovation /program
• Accomplished COT-RPMS 2 with TA provided to
Tools (for MOV No.1) all teachers
• Others

No non-negotiable No validation and No validation and

document presented utilization of data utilization of data
gathered gathered
1 and no intervention/
innovation developed

BULLS 36
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Ensured a learner- Non-negotiable Documents Implemented plans, The school is 91-100% Achieved and
friendly, inclusive, monitored the CFSS & GEBS sustained the objective
motivating, and 1. Certificate of CFFS, GEBS activities, and compliant and 91- in all quarters
enabling environment & GEB-C compliance evaluated the 100% of the
for effective learning recognized at least at the implementation, and classrooms are GEB-
to happen. district level across the four documented CFSS C certified
quarters with four authentic
2. Quarterly Accomplishment 5 non-negotiable
Report on compliance to documents and at least
GEBS and GEB-C program one support document
3. Fiscal Resources in every MOV
allocation, management and
implementation report for
enabling, safe, motivating,
learner-friendly and engaging
learning environment
4. Implementation Report of Implemented plans, The school is 76-90% Achieved and
School intervention(s)/ monitored the CFSS & GEBS sustained the objective
innovation (s)/project(s) on activities, and compliant and 76-90% in the second quarter
establishing an enabling, safe, evaluated the of the classrooms are
motivating, learner-friendly implementation, and GEB-C certified
and engaging learning documented CFSS
environment with three authentic
non-negotiable
Supporting documents (Any 4 documents and at least
of these): one support document
in every MOV
• Sample of accomplished
evaluation tool, Evaluation
report (for MOV No. 1 &2)
• Validated CFSS Rating in
the district level (for MOV
No. 2)
• Concept paper of
intervention/innovation/ 10.00 13 4.333333333 0.43
project developed/proposed by
BULLS 37
the school head duly approved
 allocation, management and
implementation report for
enabling, safe, motivating,
learner-friendly and engaging
learning environment
4. Implementation OFFICE
Report PERFORMANCE
of COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
School intervention(s)/
Name of Employee: innovation
ALMA O. (s)/project(s)
VALLESCAS on Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD
Position: establishing
School an enabling,
Principal-I safe, Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
motivating, learner-friendly
Review Period: 4/22/2022
and engaging learning Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of
environment Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022
Supporting documents (Any
of these):
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
• Sample of accomplished
evaluation tool, Evaluation Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
report (for MOV No.
MEANS OF1 &2) per c
KRA OBJECTIVES • VERIFICATION
Validated CFSS Rating in ACTUAL
(MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
the district level (for MOV (%) RESULT
r
No. 2) e
• Concept paper of
intervention/innovation/ Implemented plans, The school is 51-75% Achieved and
10.00 monitored the CFSS & GEBS sustained the objective 13 4.333333333 0.43
project developed/proposed by
the school head duly approved activities, and compliant and 51-75% in the third quarter
by SDO (for MOV No. 4) evaluated the of the classrooms are
• Documents showing implementation, and GEB-C certifiedrs.
partnerships with stakeholders documented CFSS
(for MOV No. 1&2) with two authentic
• Financial Reports/Subsidiary non-negotiable
3
Ledger (for MOV No. 3) documents and at least
• School Improvement Plan one support document
(SIP) reflecting the targets for in every MOV
ensuring a learner-friendly,
inclusive, motivating, and
enabling environment
• Others

Implemented plans, The school is 26-50% Achieved and

monitored the CFSS & GEBS sustained the objective
activities, and compliant and 26-50% in the fourth quarter
evaluated the of the classrooms are
implementation, and GEB-C certified
documented CFSS
with one authentic
2
non-negotiable
documents and at least
one support document
in every MOV

Implemented, The school is 25% or Objective not achieved

monitored, without less CFSS & GEBS within the rating
1 any MOV compliant and 25% or periods
less of the classrooms
are GEB-C certified

BULLS 38
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
KRA 4: Set personal and Main Documents: 100% of teaching and Submitted at least 4 100% RPMS Cycle
Developing Self professional 1. School Plan for non-teaching documents as stated timeline is followed
and Others (10%) development goals Professional Development personnel
based on self- 2. accomplished SAT
assessment aligned INSET , LAC and Coaching and developed
Implementation Plan 5 Individual
Development plan
Supporting Documents: (IDP)

•Reflection Journal ,
•Portfolio 96-99 % of teaching Submitted at least 3 RPMS Cycle timeline
(sample only) and non-teaching documents as stated is conducted 2 weeks
personnel delayed
4 accomplished SAT
and developed IDP.

91-95% of teaching Submitted at least 2 RPMS Cycle timeline

3.00 and non-teaching documents as stated is conducted 3 weeks 15 5 0.15
personnel delayed
3 accomplished SAT
and developed IDP

86-90% of teaching Submitted at least 1 RPMS Cycle timeline

and non-teaching documents as stated is conducted 4 weeks
personnel delayed
2 accomplished SAT
and developed IDP.

BULLS 39
 •Reflection Journal ,
•Portfolio
(sample only)

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
3.00 15 5 0.15
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
85 AND BELOW% of No acceptable RPMS Cycle timeline
teaching and non- evidence was shown is conducted 5 weeks
teaching personnel delayed
1 accomplished SAT
and developed IDP.

Engaged actively in Main Documents: 100% of the school 100% of the planned 100% LAC and
professional networks 1. Accomplishment Report of personnel participated INSET or LAC were INSET and other PD
within and across Trainings/LAC Sessions professional networks conducted. activities were
schools. Conducted (Minutes, and performance conducted as
pictures) management and scheduled.
2. PMCF for school 5 leadership
heads/MTs development

3. Summary of IPCRF
Rating
4. School
Head's Certificate of 90-99% of the school 90-99% of the planned 90-99%% LAC and
participation to a Training or personnel participated INSET or LAC were INSET were conducted
short course or Certificate of professional networks conducted. as scheduled.
recognition as resource and performance
speaker management and
Supporting Documents: leadership
• ID/Certificate of 4
development
Membership to any
professional organization
• Pictures/ Documentation
of RPMS Cycle
•
Study Permits and TOR (if
graduated or CAR) of the
current year •
Summarized form of
trainings/short 4.00 15 5.00 0.20
courses/conferences
attended/participated by the
BULLS 40
 professional networks 1. Accomplishment Report of
within and across Trainings/LAC Sessions
schools. Conducted (Minutes,
pictures)
2. PMCF for school
heads/MTs OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA3.O. VALLESCAS

Summary of IPCRF Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD
Position: Rating
School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 4. School Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Head's Certificate of
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
participation to a Training or
School Year: short course or Certificate of
2021-2022
recognition as resource
speaker TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
Supporting Documents:
• ID/Certificate of
Membership to any Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
MEANS
professional OF
organization per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
• VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o
Pictures/ Documentation RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
of RPMS Cycle r
• e
Study Permits and TOR (if
80-89% of the school 80-89% of the planned 80-89% LAC and
graduated or CAR) of the
personnel participated INSET or LAC were INSET were conducted
current year •
professional networks conducted. as scheduled.
Summarized form of
and performance
trainings/short 4.00 15 5.00 0.20
management and
courses/conferences 3 leadership
attended/participated by the
development
personnel (Categorized by
level)

70-79% of the school 70-79% of the planned 70-79% LAC and

personnel participated INSET or LAC were INSET were conducted
professional networks conducted. as scheduled.
and performance
management and
2 leadership
development

10-69% of the school 10-69% of the planned 10-69% LAC and

personnelparticipated INSET or LAC were INSET were conducted
professional networks conducted. as scheduled.
and performance
1 management and
leadership
development

BULLS 41
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Initiated teacher’s Main Documents: 100% of the teachers Submitted all Non- 0
general welfare and • Contextualized School general welfare and negotiable and
implement school Rewarding System Policy and work negotiable documents.
rewarding system Implementation (Attachments: 5 accomplishments were
Pictures, list of awardees, etc.) recognized
NEGOTIABLE
• List of teachers
recommended for promotion, 81-90% of the Submitted at least 3 0
teachers general non-negotiable and
• list of endorsed welfare and work any of the negotiable
teachers to higher awards and 4 accomplishments were documents as stated
recognition and/or scholarship recognized
grants.
• list of teachers promoted
• List of awards received 71-80% of the Submitted at least 2 0
by employees within the teachers general and any of the
school year welfare and work negotiable documents
• Compilation of 3.00 3 accomplishments were as stated 10 5 0.15
Maternity/Paternity Leaves (if recognized
any) and service credits
availed within the year.
61-70% of the Submitted at least 1 0
teachers general and any of the
welfare and work negotiable documents
2 accomplishments were as stated
recognized

50-60% of the No acceptable 0

teachers general evidence was shown
welfare and work
1 accomplishments were
recognized

BULLS 42
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
KRA 5: Building 1. Managed diverse Non-negotiable Documents Established Partnered 5 Updated DPDS /
Connections relationships to Partnerships with 5 stakeholders supported Inventory Report
(10%) sustain an enabling 1. By-Laws of PTA, Faculty school stakeholders with MOV1-5 each monthly
and supportive Club and SSG through and generated
environment for 2. Annual ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/W resources based on the
learners. Work Plans 5 inS, etc. and others scoring matrix
3. Minutes of the Meeting and generated
with Attendance resources based on
4. Approved school's category.
MOU/MOA/Pledge of
Commitment
5. Accomplishment Established Partnered 4 Updated DPDS /
Report with Pictures (at least 2 Partnerships with 4 stakeholders supported Inventory Report bi-
pages) school stakeholders with MOV 1-5 eac and monthly
Other through generated resources
acceptable MOVs: ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/W based on the scoring
4 inS etc. and others and matrix
*Sample Certificates of
Recognition, *SOSA and/or generated resources
SMEA Reports * based on school's
Letter of Invitation to category.
stakeholders * Other proof
of engagement (Attendance to Established Partnered 3 Updated DPDS /
Programs and other activities) Partnerships with 3 stakeholders supported Inventory Report
school stakeholders with MOV 1-5 each quarterly
through and generated
ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/W resources based on the
5.00 3 inS etc. and others and scoring matrix 15 5 0.25
generated resources
based on school's
category.

BULLS 43
 MOU/MOA/Pledge of
Commitment
5. Accomplishment
Report with Pictures (at least 2
pages)
OFFICE
Other PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
acceptable MOVs:
Name of Employee: *Sample
ALMA O. Certificates
VALLESCAS of Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD
Position: Recognition,
School *SOSA
Principal-I and/or Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
SMEA Reports *
Review Period: 4/22/2022
Letter of Invitation to Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of
stakeholders Bukidnon
* Other proof
School Year: of engagement (Attendance to
2021-2022
Programs and other activities)
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

5.00
Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS 15 5 0.25
MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Established Partnered 2 Updated DPDS /
Partnerships with 2 stakeholders supported Inventory Report by
school stakeholders with MOV 1-5 each semester
through and generated
ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/W resources based on the
2 inS etc. and others and scoring matrix
generated resources
based on school's
category.

Established Partnered 1 Updated DPDS /

Partnerships with stakeholder supported Inventory Report
1school stakeholders with MOV 1-5 and annually
through generated resources
ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/W based on the scoring
1 inS etc. and others and matrix
generated resources
based on school's
category.

2. Initiated a culture Main Documents: Initiated and Facilitated 5 activities 0

of inclusivity in the 1. Approved School conducted 5 Activities supported with MOV
school and the GAD Plan/School IPEd related to gender 1-5 each.
community Plan/ALIVE Plan sensitivity, physical
2. Accomplishment 5 and mental health
Reports 3. awareness, and culture
Attendance responsiveness
4. Photos
5.
Certificate of Recognition or
Participation

BULLS 44
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022
2. Initiated a culture Main Documents:
of inclusivity in the 1. Approved School TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
school and the GAD Plan/School IPEd
community Plan/ALIVE Plan
2. Accomplishment Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
KRA OBJECTIVES Reports MEANS OF 3. per c
ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o
Attendance RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
4. Photos r
5. e
Certificate of Recognition or Initiated and Facilitated 4 activities 0
Participation conducted 4 Activities supported with MOV
related to gender 1-5 each.
sensitivity, physical
4 and mental health
awareness, and culture
responsiveness

Initiated and Facilitated 3 activities 0

conducted 3 Activities supported with MOV
related to gender 1-5 each.
sensitivity, physical
2.50 3 and mental health 10 5.00 0.13
awareness, and culture
responsiveness

Initiated and Facilitated 2 activities 0

conducted 2 Activities supported with MOV
related to gender 1-5 each.
sensitivity, physical
2 and mental health
awareness, and culture
responsiveness

BULLS 45
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I 2.50 Position: 10 5.00
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent 0.13
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Initiated and Facilitated 1 activity 0
conducted 1 Activity supported with MOV
related to gender 1-5.
sensitivity, physical
1 and mental health
awareness, and culture
responsiveness

3. Established 1. Accomplishment Reports Established Partnered 5 Updated DPDS /

Community with photos (at least 2 pages) Partnerships with 5 stakeholders supported Inventory Report
Engagement and 2. school stakeholders with MOV1-5 each monthly
Partnerships Deed of Donations or through and generated
Certification / IGPs ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/W resources based on the
3. 5 inS, etc. and others scoring matrix
Printed copies of DPDS / and generated
Financial Reports resources based on
4. school's category.
Inventory of Donated
Resources or Projects / Project
Acceptance 5. Established Partnered 4 Updated DPDS /
Awards and Recognitions Partnerships with 4 stakeholders supported Inventory Report bi-
Received school stakeholders with MOV 1-5 eac and monthly
through generated resources
ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/W based on the scoring
4 inS etc. and others and matrix
generated resources
based on school's
category.

2.50 15 5 0.13
BULLS 46
 3. Established 1. Accomplishment Reports
Community with photos (at least 2 pages)
Engagement and 2.
Partnerships Deed of Donations or
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Certification / IGPs
3.
Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS
Printed copies of DPDS / Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD
Position: School Principal-I
Financial Reports Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 4. Date of Review: 04/22/2022
InventoryofofBukidnon
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division Donated
Resources or Projects / Project
School Year: 2021-2022
Acceptance 5.
Awards and Recognitions
Received TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e
Established Partnered 3 Updated DPDS /
Partnerships with 3 stakeholders supported Inventory Report
school stakeholders with MOV 1-5 each quarterly
through and generated
ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/W resources based on the
2.50 3 inS etc. and others and scoring matrix 15 5 0.13
generated resources
based on school's
category.

Established Partnered 2 Updated DPDS /

Partnerships with 2 stakeholders supported Inventory Report by
school stakeholders with MOV 1-5 each semester
through and generated
ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/W resources based on the
2 inS etc. and others and scoring matrix
generated resources
based on school's
category.

Established Partnered 1 Updated DPDS /

Partnerships with stakeholder supported Inventory Report
1school stakeholders with MOV 1-5 and annually
through generated resources
ASP/BE/SBM/GPP/W based on the scoring
1 inS etc. and others and matrix
generated resources
based on school's
category.

KRA 6 Plus
See attachment 5 5 5 0.25
Factor 5%
Over-all Rating VERY SATISFACTORY 4.43
BULLS 47
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ALMA O. VALLESCAS Name of Rater: LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD

Position: School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: 4/22/2022 Date of Review: 04/22/2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Division of Bukidnon
School Year: 2021-2022

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Weight s QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

MEANS OF per c
KRA OBJECTIVES ACTUAL
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Objective o RATING SCORE
(%) RESULT
r
e

RATEE: RATER:
ALMA O. VALLESCAS LANILA M. PALAPAR, PhD
School Principal-I Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

4/22/2022 04/22/2022
Date Date

APPROVED:

RANDOLPH B. TORTOLA
Schools Division Superintendent

BULLS 48