Modal Verbs
Modal Verbs
Dare and need can either be constructed as modal auxiliaries ( with bare
infinitive and with no inflected –s form ) or as lexical verbs ( with to infinitive
and with inflected –s form).
The modal verb construction is restricted to non- assertive contexts, as mainly
negative sentences, whereas the lexical verb construction can always be used
and is in fact the more common.
So be it then!
CAN/COULD
Can
(1) Ability He can speak English but he can’t write it very well
= be able to ( he is able to speak/capable of speaking)
Be capable of,
Know how to
(2) Permission Can I smoke in here?
= be allowed to, (Am I allowed to smoke in here?)
Be permitted to
(3) Theoretical possibility Anybody can make mistakes
( contrast May= ( It is possible people make mistakes)
Factual possibility
Could
(1) Past ability I never could play the piano
(2) Present or future permission Could I smoke in here?
(3) Present possibility We could go to the concert
( theoretical or factual) The road could be blocked
(4) Contingent possibility If we had more money, we could
or ability in unreal buy a car
conditions
MAY / MIGHT
May
(1) Permission You may borrow my car if you like
= be allowed to
(In this sense may is more mustn’t borrow
formal than can. Instead You { are not allowed to } my
of may not or mayn’t, the may not car
stronger mustn’t is often
used in the negative to express
prohibition)
(2) Possibility (usually factual) The road may be blocked ( it is
Possible that the road is blocked
Might
(1) Permission(rare) Might I smoke in here?
(2) Possibility (theoretical or We might go to the concert
factual What you say might be true
May and might are among the modals auxiliaries which involve difference of
meaning in passing from declarative to interrogative or negative.
There is a rare use of may as a ‘quasi- subjunctive’ auxiliary to express wish in
positive sentences
SHALL/SHOULD
Of all these meanings it is the one of intention that it is widely used today. Shall
is , on the whole and especially in BrE, an infrequent auxiliary with restricted
use compared with should, will and would; will is generally preferred, except in
1st person questions:
Should
(1) Obligation and logical You should do as he says
necessity( = ought to) They should be home by now
(2) ‘Putative’ use after It is odd that you should say this to me
certain expressions
‘It is a pity that’ I am sorry that this should have
‘I am surprised that’ happened
WILL/WOULD
Will
(1)Willingness. Used in He’ll help you if you ask him
Polite requests Will you have another cup of tea?
Will you please open the window?
(2) Intention. Usually I’ll write as soon as I can
contracted ‘ll mainly in We won’t stay longer than two hours
1st person
(3) Insistence. Stressed He will do it, whatever you say
hence no ‘ll contraction (He insists on doing it…)
He will keep on interrupting me
(4)Prediction (a) Specific prediction:
The similar meanings of will
other expressions for logical the game { must } be finished by now
necessity and habitual present. should
The contracted form ‘ll is common.
(b) Timeless prediction:
oil { will float } on water
floats
Would
(1) Willingness Would you excuse me?
(2) Insistence It’s your own fault ;you would
take the baby with you
(3) Characteristic activity Every morning he would go for a
in the past long walk
John would make a mess of
Everything
(4) Contingent use in the He would smoke too much if I
main clause of a conditional didn’t stop him
sentence.
(5) Probability That would be his mother
MUST
OUGHT TO
Ought to and should both denote obligation and logical necessity, but are less
categorical than must and have to.
Only some of the modals have corresponding present and past form:
PRESENT PAST
Can could
May could (might)
Shall should
Will would
Must had to
----- used to
Ought to ---------
Need ---------
Dare dared
The following modals are not used in the past tense except in reported speech:
Must
Ought to
Need
Had to serves as the past of both must and have to
The perfective and progressive aspects are normally excluded when the modal
expresses ‘ability’ or ‘permission’ , and also when shall or will express
‘volition’.
These aspects are freely used, however, with other modal meanings:
(1)If a modal verb is followed by Be and a main verb ending in –ing it indicates
progressive aspect, as do all progressive tenses
Or
(2) it is in the passive voice and Be is followed by a main verb in the form of a
past participle.
(1)
He may be waiting for us now. Let’s hurry then
When modal verbs are followed by HAVE and a past participle of the main verb,
they have a perfect aspect which does not mean that the meaning is past
tense , but that he action has a finished meaning whether the action may occur
in the future o has occurred in the past
This action concerns the past , because something did not happen when there
was a possibility of it happening
This action has to happen in some planned future, meaning that the action has
to be completed by that time in the future, but has not happened yet.