Cdi-1: Fundamentals of Criminal Investigation
Cdi-1: Fundamentals of Criminal Investigation
INVESTIGATION
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
is an art which deals with the identity and location of the offender and provides evidence
of guilt through criminal proceedings.
INVESTIGATION DEFINED
The collection of facts to accomplish a three-fold aim:
a. to identify the guilty party;
b. to locate the guilty party; and
c. to provide evidence of his guilt.
TRAINING
Training, as one of the foundations of investigation, is concededly a vital ingredient in the
creation of a total investigator. Experience alone does not make one good investigator. Many
who had been hostage to this notion often ended in jeopardy. The ideal conjugal partnership is
training and experience. The fusion of the best training and vast experience is a formidable
force that can threat even the most sophisticated technology and syndicated crimes. The
necessity of training as a purveyor of change builds the investigator’s confidence. It widens
his vision for professional growth and strengthens his will to survive and prevail over crises.
The National Forensic Science Training Institute (NFSTI) under the Philippine Public Safety
College is the institution that trains uniformed personnel of the Philippine National Police to
become a certified investigator.
1. INFORMATION
It is the knowledge/data which an investigator acquired from other persons and records.
CLASSES OF INFORMATION
a. Regular Sources
CDI-1: FUNDAMENTALS OF CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
records, files from government and non-government agencies, news items.
b. Cultivated Sources
information gathered upon initiative of the investigator from informants, vendors, taxicab
driver, GRO, and others.
c. Grapevine Sources
these are information coming from the underworld characters such as prisoners and ex-
convicts.
BASIC ASSUMPTIONS
Nobody has to talk to law enforcers. No law compels a person to talk to the police if he
does not want to. Therefore, people will have to be persuaded, always within legal and
ethical limits, to talk to law enforcers. This makes interviewing an art.
I.R.O.N.I.C. FORMAT
The interview of a witness can be described by its acronym ‘IRONIC’ which stands for
Identity, Rapport, Opening Statement, Narration, Inquiry, and conclusion.
IDENTITY
prior to the commencement of an interview, the investigator should identify himself to the
subject by name, rank and agency. Except, when there is no need to know the officer’s
identity.
RAPPORT
it is good to get the positive feeling of the subject towards the investigators, such friendly
atmosphere is a vital for both the subject and the investigator t have a better interaction.
OPENING STATEMENT
the investigator must have to indicate why the subject is being contracted.
NARRATION
the witness should be allowed to tell all he knows with little interruptions from the
investigator.
INQUIRY
after all information have been given by the subject, that is the time for the investigator to as
question to clarify him about the case under investigation.
CONCLUSIONS
after the interview, it is but proper to close the interview with outmost courtesy and thanking
the subject for his cooperation.
INTERROGATION
is a questioning of a person suspected of having committed an offense or a person who is
reluctant to make full disclosure of information in his possession which is pertinent to the
investigation.
CDI-1: FUNDAMENTALS OF CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
What are the purposes of Interrogation?
a. To obtain confession to the crime
b. To induce the suspect to make admission
c. To learn the facts of the crime
d. To learn the identity of the accomplice
e. To develop information which will lead to the recovery of the fruits of the crime
f. To discover the details of other crimes participated by the suspect
INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES
Emotional Appeal
Place the subject in the proper frame of mind. The investigator should provide emotional
stimuli that will prompt the subject to unburden himself by confiding. Analyze the subject’s
personality and decide what motivation would prompt him to tell the truth, and then provide
those motives through appropriate emotional appeals.
Sympathetic appeal
The suspect may feel the need for sympathy or friendship when he is apparently in trouble.
Gestures of friendship may win his cooperation.
Kindness
The simplest technique is to assume that the suspect will confess if he is treated in a kind and
friendly manner.
Extenuation
The investigator indicates he does not consider his subject’s indiscretion a grave offense.
Jolting
May be applied to calm and nervous subjects by constantly observing the suspects, the
investigator chooses a propitious moment to shout a pertinent question and appear as
though he is beside himself with rage. The subject may be unnerved to the extent of
confessing.
CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION/INVESTIGATION
CDI-1: FUNDAMENTALS OF CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
is the questioning of a law enforcement officer on a person under custody and otherwise
deprived of his freedom or liberty. This is the stage in investigation where there is strict
observance of the Miranda Doctrine.
MIRANDA DOCTRINE
this case which entitled Miranda vs. Arizona, is a US Supreme Court Jurisprudence which
laid down the constitutional rights of the accused during custodial investigation. It was
incorporated in our 1973 Constitution and later in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines.
3. INSTRUMENTATION
It is the application of instruments and methods of physical science to the detection of crimes.
In cases where there are no significant physical evidence to be found, then the use of
instrumentation is relatively unimportant.
1. IDENTIFICATION OF CRIMINALS
CONFESSION
is the direct acknowledgement of guilt arising from the commission of a crime.
Types of Confession
a. Extra-Judicial Confession
those made by the suspect during custodial investigation.
b. Judicial Confession
those made by the accused in open court. The plea of guilt may be during
arraignment or in any stage of the proceedings where the accused changes his
plea of not guilty to guilty.
ADMISSION
is a self-incriminatory statement by the subject falling short of an
acknowledgement of guilt. It is an acknowledgement of a fact or circumstances from which
guilt maybe inferred. It implicates but does not incriminate. It is also an acknowledgement
that a fact, action or circumstances are true which strongly infer or directly admit guilt but
lacks the detail of the elements of the crime.