A Guide To The Lifeblood of DAM: Key Concepts and Best Practices For Using Metadata in DAM.
A Guide To The Lifeblood of DAM: Key Concepts and Best Practices For Using Metadata in DAM.
Key concepts and best practices for using metadata in digital asset management systems.
By John Horodyski. Sponsored by Widen Enterprises and DigitalAssetManagement.com.
A guide to the lifeblood of DAM: Key concepts and best practices for using metadata in digital asset management systems.
Do you know what digital assets you have and how to identify, organize, and describe them? This should not be rushed, as this is critical to the impact your DAM systems use will have on your overall efficiency and, ultimately, your bottom line. Getting this wrong could damn not only your DAM, but your broader workflows and processes as well. Metadata is an asset unto itselfand an important one, at that. It provides the structure and information needed to make your assets more accessible and, therefore, more valuable. In other words: it makes them smart assets. Simply digitizing video and audio files only scratches the surface of their value as digital assets. Their full potential is realized by their use and the relevance of the associated metadata. After all, how much value does an asset have if you cant find it? This white paper will show you the essential building blocks and best practices of metadata for your digital asset management system.
Descriptive metadata describes a resource for purposes such as discovery and identification (i.e., information you would use in a search). It can include elements such as title, abstract, author, and keywords. Structural metadata indicates how compound objects are put together, for example, how pages are ordered to form chapters (e.g., file format, file dimension, file length, etc.) Administrative metadata provides information that helps manage an asset, such as when and how it was created, file format and who can access it. There are several subsets of administrative data. Two that are sometimes listed as separate metadata types are rights management metadata (which deals with intellectual proper ty rights) and preservation metadata (which contains information needed to archive and preser ve a resource).
Here are some other key concepts to understand, especially if youre starting your metadata analysis: Taxonomy: The science of naming and organizing things into groups or classes that share similar characteristics. It can also refer to any scheme for such an organization of informationin the case of DAM, for the purpose of classifying and identifying digital assets. Taxonomy through metadata - The categories, sub-categories and terms that make up a taxonomy often manifest themselves as metadata. Metadata therefore enables more precise search results and personalization. Controlled vocabulary: Controlled vocabularies contain preferred and variant terms with defined relationshipshierarchical and/or associative. Examples of controlled vocabularies include glossaries, specialized dictionaries, standard terminology lists, synonym rings, reference data, authority files, domain-specific taxonomies, thesauri and ontologies. Thesaurus: A tool that controls synonyms and identifies the relationships among terms. It usually has a preferred term and can be hierarchical but doesnt have to be. For example, dog, pooch, puppy, mutt and dog is the preferred term.
A guide to the lifeblood of DAM: Key concepts and best practices for using metadata in digital asset management systems.
Authority files: Typically used for lists of people, organizations etc. e.g. list of public companies, industry segments, geographic locations. This could be a taxonomy.
1. What problems do you need to solve? 2. Who is going to use the metadata, and for what? 3. What kinds of metadata are important for those purposes?
It is important to consider how much metadata you need. Metadata is expensive; it takes valuable time to create the structure and ensure that it serves your needs. If it does not, then time and money are wasted not finding assets due to inadequate metadata. Building, testing, inputting and maintaining metadata and taxonomies come with costs. Implementing metadata may require UI changes and/or back-end system changes. Every metadata field costs money and time to implement and adjust to. You need to make your model extensible and avoid the common mistake of buying tools first, then figuring out the metadata strategy later. Ensure that you account for business goals and how metadata should contribute to reaching those goals. To help get that going, there are some critical components of a metadata strategy that need consideration: Building the right team: Name a team of DAM stakeholders to take the lead in identifying goals and designing a metadata strategy to meet those goals. Naming your requirements: Before getting deeply involved with any vendors, you should be able to ar ticulate and enumerate (both to the vendor and your own organization) those things you absolutely need a DAM system to do for your organization. Making the business case: Identify all costs, benefits and risks of creating and maintaining rich metadata. When making ROI calculations, you should account for the resources required to add, maintain, test, and update metadata and taxonomies. Metadata specifications: These are always subject to change, but you should have some sense of what your metadata model will look like, including any controlled vocabularies and keywords. Ongoing workflow: Where will metadata come from? Know who will be responsible for maintaining and adding metadata, along with what processes theyll be following. Q/A & Testing: Have a method of measuring the effectiveness of your metadata model and protocols. Detailed metrics go a long way when it comes time to evaluate and make improvements. There is a considerable effort behind this, but careful observation of these components will help you start your work and move you in the right direction.
A guide to the lifeblood of DAM: Key concepts and best practices for using metadata in digital asset management systems.
Rights Embargo Date Expiration Date Location Restrictions Usage Restrictions Pricing
Knowledge maintenance People Places Organizations Financial metadata Harvesting in-line markup
Each tag could point to a different topic. Yet, fundamentally, its the same principal element of the subject of President Barack Obama that is relevant. Having a principal DAM administrator and/or metadata specialist on your team will be highly valuable. In fact, depending on the size of the organization, there may well be multiple administrators in various locations responsible for tagging and asset ingestion (i.e. insertion into the DAM library). If this is the case, it is even more important to ensure metadata consistency. Last, there is metadata in headers, file systems, naming conventions and query logs that could be extracted automatically. While automatic classification tools exist and produce results that are more consistent than humangenerated ones, humans are more accurate and better at recognizing nuance. Semi-automated or hybrid approaches are often the best way to go, generally with human involvement for distributed manual review and correction.
A guide to the lifeblood of DAM: Key concepts and best practices for using metadata in digital asset management systems.
What are the industry standards and which are right for me?
Standards should be reviewed during your strategy development. Standards are created by industry members to meet the specific needs of that industry. It is wise to use an industry standard if you can find one that applies and extend it as needed. You should pick standards that are extensible so that you can add your own namespace (or other accepted extension). Sometimes content owners require vendors to offer some level of collaboration to enable automated content interchange and interoperability between software tools. It is important to remember that standards are valuable for efficient, precise, federated search and retrieval across repositories, as well as automating workflows, distribution, and integration with other business systems. Indeed, standards adoption results in huge cost savings due to the efficiencies created. Examples of metadata standards to consider are Dublin Core, PRISM, (PRISM DIM2), METS, ONIX, XMP MARC, , IPTC Headers, GILS, SCORM, IMS and JDF which one(s) you use should depend on your businessobjectives.
A guide to the lifeblood of DAM: Key concepts and best practices for using metadata in digital asset management systems.
Benefits of metadata
Some people waste more than 40 percent of their time searching for existing assets and recreating them when they arent found. This lost productivity, and redundancy can get very expensive. The key to avoiding these unnecessary costs is good metadata to aid and assist in search and retrieval. Other benefits of metadata include:
Higher ROI based on increased sales through improved product find-ability, par tner cross-sells and up-to-the minute updates to adver tising Cost-cutting through resulting from fewer customer calls (due to substantially improved website self-ser vice) and more efficient CSR responses Improved regulatory compliance (i.e. avoidance of penalties for breaches or regulations) Reduction in redundancies in work and data storage. More effective rights enforcement resulting in less loss of revenue due to piracy
A guide to the lifeblood of DAM: Key concepts and best practices for using metadata in digital asset management systems.
Best practices
Using metadata in a DAM system takes work, but once you get going, it will be your greatest asset. Some best practices to adopt include:
Star t with a few metadata fields that are relevant to all assets and gradually move on to groups of less universally applicable fields (those that are specific to cer tain file formats, products, divisions of your organization, and so on). Avoid overloading your users with metadata fields. Have a subject matter expert analyze your content to inform decisions regarding categories and tags. Have a midpoint check-in with stakeholders to ensure youre on the right track and build ongoing consensus (e.g. every three months). Be prepared to adjust metadata and taxonomies as your business needs evolve.
A guide to the lifeblood of DAM: Key concepts and best practices for using metadata in digital asset management systems.