Research Technical Writing
Research Technical Writing
TECHNICAL WRITING
systematic methods
were used to
evaluate the chosen
hypothesis.
• A thesis is a
document to
communicate the
findings of a research.
Types of Thesis
q Introduction
1.1 General Introduction
1.2 Background of the Study
1.3 Research Problem and Gaps The main objective
CHAPTER 1
1.4 Research Aim and Objectives should be to
convince others that
1.5 Scope of Work you have a
1.6 Importance of the Study worthwhile research
project and that you
have the
q Literature Review CHAPTER 2 competence and
the work-plan to
q Research Methodology complete it.
CHAPTER 3
q Conclusion & Time frame CHAPTER 4
q References
q Appendices
Structure of a Final Thesis
q Preliminary
q Title and Abstract
q Introduction
§ 1.1 General Introduction
§ 1.2 Background of the Study
§ 1.3 Research Problem and Gaps CHAPTER 1
§ 1.4 Research Aim and Objectives
§ 1.5 Scope of Research
§ 1.6 Importance of the Study
§ 1.7 Overview of the thesis
q Literature Review CHAPTER 2
q Results CHAPTER 4
q Literature Review
q Research Methods
q Results
q Acknowledgements
Quantitative Qualitative
method method
Kumaraswamy, Lam., et al,2007 Medda, F.,2007 Doloi, H., 2008 Jin, X.H., 2010 Xu,Y., 2010 Khazaeni, G.,2012
M.M., 2002,
D: Lack of risk allocation model E:The risk allocation model should cover all client F: Lack of attention to the
based on relationship between expectations (management ability , cost , behavior project objectives in risk
criteria and barriers of each part to risk allocation ) allocation model
35
LE
P Problem statement
AM Research Problems
EX
v The unavailability of comprehensive risk assessment method in PPP
project makes the risk ranking practice unfeasible. Lack of accurate
risk assessment with attention on relationship and feedback between
risks on project objectives is one of the reasons for weak risk
assessment of PPP projects.
v There is a lack of optimal risk allocation model in previous research
based on risk allocation barriers and criteria. Lack of evaluation on
independency and feedback between risk allocation criteria and
barriers on project objectives is one of the reasons for weak risk
allocation model of PPP projects.
v There is a lack of optimal risk allocation model in previous research
based on risk allocation barriers and criteria. Lack of evaluation on
independency and feedback between risk allocation criteria and
barriers on project objectives is one of the reasons for weak risk
allocation model of PPP projects.
36
L E
P 1.2 RESEARCH PROBLEMS
AM
X
E Shamsuddoha et al., 2013;
Shamsuddoha et al., 2016; Current research On-going research
Azraai, 2016
Optimization of
Ultimate aim
current design
LE
P 1. 2 RESEARCH PROBLEM
AM
EX
Common understanding:
fill damaged section; No detail information
transfer load
Putty
Performance and
Missing in existing design behaviour in composite
codes repair system not fully
understood
CHAPTER 1 :
1.3 Research Aim and Objectives
• Give a concise and clear outline of the
aims that the researcher wants to
achieve from the project.
It is an evaluation of
previous research on
your topic, where you
show that there is a
gap in the knowledge
that your research
will attempt to fill.
CHAPTER 2 :
Literature Review
• The purpose of this chapter section is to
A literature review
introduce about the subject matter. shows your readers
• The content of this section should clearly lay out that you have an in-
what is to be researched. depth grasp of your
• It indicates how knowledgeable you are in your subject; and that
respective research field. you understand
• Highlight what is the current practice or prior where your own
arts towards the problem. It can be structured research fits into
or non-structured (for unexplored areas). and adds to an
existing body of
• Critical Remarks of previous works should
agreed knowledge.
describe the strength and weakness of any
previous work that are similar to your project
and compare them with your proposed
solutions.
CHAPTER 2 :
Literature Review
A literature review has four main A literature review:
objectives:
• Demonstrates a familiarity
1. It surveys the literature in your with a body of knowledge
chosen area of study and establishes the
2. It synthesises the information in that credibility of your work;
• Summarises prior research
literature into a summary
and says how your project is
3. It critically analyses the information linked to it;
gathered by identifying gaps in • Integrates and summarises
current knowledge; by showing what is known about a
subject;
limitations of theories and points of
• Demonstrates that you have
view; and by formulating areas for learnt from others and that
further research and reviewing areas your research is a starting
of controversy point for new ideas.
4. It presents the literature in an
organised way
CHAPTER 2 :
Literature Review
Good Literature Review Poor Literature Review
• A Good Literature Review critically • A Poor Literature Review simply
evaluates the quality of the research summarizes research findings without
according to clear criteria. critical evaluation.
• Uses quotes, illustrations, graphs, • Simply lists studies without
and/or tables to present and justify presenting any critical evidence in the
the critical analysis of the literature. form of quotes, illustrations, graphs,
• Presents research evidence in a and/or tables.
meaningful chronological order. • Mixes studies from different decades
• Has an accurate and Up-To-Date without acknowledging chronological
bibliography that adheres to developments.
recognised style Guidelines. • Has inaccurate or missing references
that are poorly formatted
CHAPTER 2 :
Literature Review
• Once you have written your literature
review, check it meets the following
criteria:
• Is your review stimulating and
engaging?
• Have you used subheadings to bring
order and structure to your review?
• Do you cite influential papers?
• Have you critically evaluated cited
papers?
• Have you included any recent
developments?
• Have you removed any irrelevant or
trivial references?
• Is the majority of your research from
primary sources?
CHAPTER 2 :
Literature Review
Chapter 3: Research
Methodology
CHAPTER 3 :
Research Methodology
“..is the science of “…the systematic, “…the overall “…is the plan that “…is the
studying and theoretical analysis framework of explains why a justification for
understanding how of the methods philosophical particular research using a particular
research is/can applied in stream of approach a method is research method”.
be/should be done research. It research problem, employed”.
scientifically. In it, comprises the so that our
we study the theoretical analysis conclusions are
various steps and of the methods and valid and reliable
designs that can be principles and therefore
generally adopted associated with a credible”.
by a researcher in branch of
studying his/her knowledge”
research problem
along with the logic
behind them”.
CHAPTER 3 :
Research Methodology
• Define the overall methodology for the proposed
research including evaluating possible options,
benefits and its limitations. Methodology is the
• Methodology should be presented according to the core of your
order of the research objectives. dissertation as it is a
• Based on the objectives, suitable research methods
proof that you use the
should be chosen and justified accordingly.
• For all the chosen methods; all tools and
scientific method.
equipments to be used for data collection should be Through this chapter,
clearly shown. your study’s validity is
• For all the chosen methods, step-by-step data questioned rigorously
analysis approaches should be clearly chosen by the evaluators.
• This section must have a number of flow
charts/diagrams/infographic to show step-by-step
how the stated research objectives can be achieved
using the proposed research methods.
Research Methodology Research Methods
EX
Stage 1: Stage 2: Stage 3:
Characterization of infill Investigation of infill Enhancement of infill
properties behaviour performance
Performance evaluation
Determination of infill Determination of infill
of repair system using
properties behaviour
modified infill
Determination of Research
Method
LE
P
M
Investigation of infill
A
behaviour
EX Experimental work
(hydrostatic pressure
test)
Development of
finite element (FE)
model
Preparation of repair
Identification of
material (composite,
suitable FE software
adhesive, infill)
Simulation of detect
Repair of
geometry
defect pipe segment
(depth, width, length)
Simulation of loading
Execution of hydrostatic
condition (internal
pressure test
pressure)
No
Does the Modification of
result matched? the FE model
Yes
Determination of infill
behaviour
ACTUAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
LE
P
AM
EX
LE
P
AM
X
CHAPTER 4: CONCLUSION AND
TIMEFRAME
CHAPTER 4 :
CONCLUSION & TIMEFRAME
• Estimated timeline for
deliverables and milestones
• The “Do It Tomorrow” Problem. Thirteen weeks sounds like a long time, but it
goes by quickly. You need an implementation schedule that allocates reasonable
amounts of work throughout the entire semester
• The “Poop Out At The End” Problem. You have worked hard for 13 weeks to
complete this project. But remember, your grades is based on written reports
and oral presentations