home / fitness & health / calorie calculator

Calorie Calculator
Result
The results show a number of daily calorie estimates
that can be used as a guideline for how many calories
to consume each day to maintain, lose, or gain weight
at a chosen rate.

Maintain weight 2,776 100%

Calories/day

Mild weight loss 2,526 91%

0.25 kg/week Calories/day

Weight loss 2,276 82%

0.5 kg/week Calories/day

Extreme weight loss 1,776 64%

1 kg/week Calories/day

You probably do not need to lose

weight!

Hide info for weight gain

Mild weight gain 3,026 109%

0.25 kg/week Calories/day

Weight gain 3,276 118%

0.5 kg/week Calories/day

Fast Weight gain 3,776 136%

1 kg/week Calories/day

US Units Metric Units Other Units

Age 23 ages 15 - 80

Gender male female

Height 173 cm

Weight 49 kg

Activity Level
Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR)
Little or no exercise
Exercise 1-3 times/week
Exercise 4-5 times/week
Daily exercise or intense exercise 3-
4 times/week
Intense exercise 6-7 times/week
Very intense exercise daily, or
physical job

+ Settings

Calculate Clear

Exercise: 15-30 minutes of elevated heart rate activity.

Intense exercise: 45-120 minutes of elevated heart rate
activity.
Very intense exercise: 2+ hours of elevated heart rate activity.

On-Demand
USCE
AMOpportunities Open

Food Energy Converter

The following converter can be used to convert
between Calories and other common food energy
units.

1 Calorie-Nutritional, kcal

=
4.1868 Kilojoules-kJ

Calculate Clear

Related:
BMI Calculator | Body Fat Calculator |

Ideal Weight Calculator

This Calorie Calculator is based on several equations,

and the results of the calculator are based on an
estimated average. The Harris-Benedict Equation was
one of the earliest equations used to calculate basal
metabolic rate (BMR), which is the amount of energy
expended per day at rest. It was revised in 1984 to be
more accurate and was used up until 1990, when the
Mifflin-St Jeor Equation was introduced. The Mifflin-St
Jeor Equation also calculates BMR, and has been
shown to be more accurate than the revised Harris-
Benedict Equation. The Katch-McArdle Formula is
slightly different in that it calculates resting daily
energy expenditure (RDEE), which takes lean body
mass into account, something that neither the Mifflin-St
Jeor nor the Harris-Benedict Equation do. Of these
equations, the Mifflin-St Jeor Equation is considered
the most accurate equation for calculating BMR with
the exception that the Katch-McArdle Formula can be
more accurate for people who are leaner and know
their body fat percentage. The three equations used by
the calculator are listed below:
Mifflin-St Jeor Equation:
For men:
BMR = 10W + 6.25H - 5A + 5
For women:
BMR = 10W + 6.25H - 5A - 161
Revised Harris-Benedict Equation:
For men:
BMR = 13.397W + 4.799H - 5.677A + 88.362
For women:
BMR = 9.247W + 3.098H - 4.330A + 447.593
Katch-McArdle Formula:
BMR = 370 + 21.6(1 - F)W
where:
W is body weight in kg
H is body height in cm
A is age
F is body fat in percentage

The value obtained from these equations is the

estimated number of calories a person can consume in
a day to maintain their body-weight, assuming they
remain at rest. This value is multiplied by an activity
factor (generally 1.2-1.95), dependent on a person's
typical levels of exercise, in order to obtain a more
realistic value for maintaining body-weight (since
people are less likely to be at rest throughout the
course of an entire day). 1 pound, or approximately
0.45 kg, equates to about 3,500 calories. As such, in
order to lose 1 pound per week, it is recommended
that 500 calories be shaved off the estimate of calories
necessary for weight maintenance per day. For
example, if a person has an estimated allotment of
2,500 calories per day to maintain body-weight,
consuming 2,000 calories per day for one week would
theoretically result in 3,500 calories (or 1 pound) lost
during the period.
It is important to remember that proper diet and
exercise is largely accepted as the best way to lose
weight. It is inadvisable to lower calorie intake by more
than 1,000 calories per day, as losing more than 2
pounds per week can be unhealthy, and can result in
the opposite effect in the near future by reducing
metabolism. Losing more than 2 pounds a week will
likely involve muscle loss, which in turn lowers BMR,
since more muscle mass results in higher BMR.
Excessive weight loss can also be due to dehydration,
which is unhealthy. Furthermore, particularly when
exercising in conjunction with dieting, maintaining a
good diet is important, since the body needs to be able
to support its metabolic processes and replenish itself.
Depriving the body of the nutrients it requires as part of
heavily unhealthy diets can have serious detrimental
effects, and weight lost in this manner has been shown
in some studies to be unsustainable, since the weight
is often regained in the form of fat (putting the
participant in a worse state than when beginning the
diet). As such, in addition to monitoring calorie intake,
it is important to maintain levels of fiber intake as well
as other nutritional necessities to balance the needs of
the body.

Calorie Counting as a Means for

Weight Loss
Calorie counting with the intent of losing weight, on its
simplest levels, can be broken down into a few general
steps:

1. Determine your BMR using one of the provided

equations. If you know your body fat percentage,
the Katch-McArdle Formula might be a more
accurate representation of your BMR. Remember
that the values attained from these equations are
approximations and subtracting exactly 500
calories from your BMR will not necessarily result
in exactly 1 pound lost per week – it could be
less, or it could be more!
2. Determine your weight loss goals. Recall that 1
pound (~0.45 kg) equates to approximately 3500
calories, and reducing daily caloric intake relative
to estimated BMR by 500 calories per day will
theoretically result in a loss of 1 pound a week. It
is generally not advisable to lose more than 2
pounds per week as it can have negative health
effects, i.e. try to target a maximum daily calorie
reduction of approximately 1000 calories per day.
Consulting your doctor and/or a registered
dietician nutritionist (RDN) is recommended in
cases where you plan to lose more than 2
pounds per week.
3. Choose a method to track your calories and
progress towards your goals. If you have a
smartphone, there are many easy-to-use
applications that facilitate tracking calories,
exercise, and progress, among other things.
Many, if not all of these, have estimates for the
calories in many brand-name foods or dishes at
restaurants, and if not, they can estimate calories
based on the amount of the individual
components of the foods. It can be difficult to get
a good grasp on food proportions and the
calories they contain – which is why counting
calories (as well as any other approach) is not for
everyone – but if you meticulously measure and
track the number of calories in some of your
typical meals, it quickly becomes easier to
accurately estimate calorie content without
having to actually measure or weigh your food
each time. There are also websites that can help
to do the same, but if you prefer, manually
maintaining an excel spreadsheet or even a pen
and paper journal are certainly viable
alternatives.
4. Track your progress over time and make
changes to better achieve your goals if
necessary. Remember that weight loss alone is
not the sole determinant of health and fitness,
and you should take other factors such as fat vs.
muscle loss/gain into account as well. Also, it is
recommended that measurements are taken
over longer periods of time such as a week
(rather than daily) as significant variations in
weight can occur simply based on water intake or
time of day. It is also ideal to take measurements
under consistent conditions, such as weighing
yourself as soon as you wake up and before
breakfast, rather than at different times
throughout the day.
5. Keep at it!

The above steps are an attempt at the most basic form

of calorie counting. Calorie counting is not an exact
science, and can be as complex as you want to make
it. The above does not consider the proportions of
macronutrients consumed. While there is no exactly
known, ideal proportion of macronutrients (fats,
proteins, carbohydrates), some balance is certainly
advisable, and different foods have been found to have
different effects on health, feelings of hunger, and
number of calories burned. Generally, minimally
processed plant and animal foods tend to be more
conducive to healthy weight loss and maintenance.
There are many approaches to weight loss and there
is no set ideal method that works for all people, which
is why so many different diets and exercise regimens
exist. While some methods are more effective for each
individual person, not all weight loss methods are
equivalent, and studies suggest that some approaches
are healthier than others. That being said, one of the
most commonly effective weight loss methods is
counting calories. In its most basic form, calories
consumed minus calories expended will result in
weight gain if the result is positive, or weight loss if the
result is negative. However, this is far from a
comprehensive picture, and many other factors play a
role in affecting healthy, sustainable weight loss. For
example, there exist conflicting studies addressing
whether or not the type of calories or foods consumed,
or how they are consumed, affects weight loss.
Studies have shown that foods that require a person to
chew more and are more difficult to digest result in the
body burning more calories, sometimes referred to as
the thermic effect of food. While the increase in burned
calories may be marginal, foods that are more difficult
to digest such as vegetables generally tend to be
healthier and provide more nutrients for fewer calories
than many processed foods.
Consistent with the view that in regards to weight loss,
only net calories are important and not their source,
there exist cases such as the Twinkie diet, where a
person that solely counted calories while eating a
variety of cake snacks managed to lose 27 pounds
over two months. As effective as this can be, it is
certainly not suggested. While the participant did not
seem to suffer any noticeable health detriments in this
particular case, there are other less measurable
factors that should be considered such as long-term
effects of such a diet on potential for developing
cancers, heart disease, and diabetes. However,
ignoring efficiency and health, sustained, significant
reduction of caloric intake or increase of physical
activity should result in weight loss, and counting
calories can be an effective way to achieve this sole
result.
Aside from being one viable method for facilitating
weight loss, calorie counting has other somewhat less
quantifiable advantages including helping to increase
nutritional awareness. Many people are completely
unaware of, or grossly underestimate their daily caloric
intake. Counting calories can help raise awareness of
different types of foods, the number of calories they
contain, and how these calories have a different effect
on a person's feelings of satiety. Once a person has a
better understanding of how many calories are actually
in that bag of chips that they can so easily inhale within
minutes, how much of their daily caloric intake it
consumes, and how little the chips do to satiate their
hunger, portion control and avoidance of foods with
empty calories tends to become easier.
Having actual caloric measurements can also assist in
weight loss, since tangible calorie goals can be set,
rather than simply trying to eat less. Also, although this
is not necessarily directly related to calorie counting,
studies have shown that portion control by simply
eating from a smaller plate can help reduce calorie
intake, since people tend to fill their plates and eat
everything on their plates. Many people do not realize
that they are overeating, since they have become
accustomed to restaurant-sized portions being the
norm, when said portions can be up to three or more
times larger than necessary for a typical meal.
Tracking calories also puts exercise in a quantifiable
perspective, increasing a person's awareness
regarding how much exercise is really required to
counteract a 220-calorie bag of M&M's. Once a link is
made between the amount of exercise that some
snack equates to, many people find abstaining from
that bag of chips to be the preferred option rather than
performing an equivalent amount of exercise – which
can lead to healthier eating habits.
In the end, however, what's important is picking a
strategy that works for you. Calorie counting is only
one method used to achieve weight loss amongst
many, and even within this method, there are many
possible approaches a person can take. Finding an
approach that fits within your lifestyle that you think
you would be able to adhere to is likely going to
provide the most sustainable option and desirable
result.

Zigzag Calorie Cycling

Zigzag calorie cycling is a weight loss approach that

aims to counteract the human body's natural adaptive
tendencies. Counting and restricting calories, as
described above, is a viable method to lose weight, but
over a period of time, it is possible for the body to
adapt to the lower number of calories consumed. In
cases where this happens, a plateau in weight loss
that can be difficult to surmount can result. This is
where zigzag calorie cycling can help, by not allowing
the body to adapt to the lower calorie environment.
Zigzag calorie cycling involves alternating the number
of calories consumed on a given day. A person on a
zigzag diet should have a combination of high-calorie
and low-calorie days to meet the same overall weekly
calorie target. For example, if your target calorie intake
is 14,000 calories per week, you could consume 2,300
calories three days a week, and 1,775 the other four
days of the week, or you could consume 2,000 calories
each day. In both cases, 14,000 calories would be
consumed over the week, but the body wouldn't adapt
and compensate for a 2,000-calorie diet. This also
allows a person more flexibility in their diet, allowing
them to plan around occasions, such as work or family
gatherings, where a person may consume more
calories. Consuming a lower number of calories on
other days can allow a person to enjoy these
gatherings or even have a "cheat day" where they eat
whatever they want without feeling guilty, since they
can make up for the excess calories on their low-
calorie days.
There is no concrete rule or study that dictates the
most effective way to alternate or spread out calorie
consumption. How to vary calorie intake is largely up
to personal discretion. Depending on a person's
activity, it is generally recommended that the high-
calorie and low-calorie days vary by approximately
200-300 calories, where the high-calorie day is often
the number of calories a person needs to consume to
maintain their current weight. For a person with a
higher activity level, the calorie difference should be
larger. The calculator presents two zigzag diet
schedules. The first schedule has two higher calorie
days and five lower calorie days. The second schedule
increases and reduces calories gradually. In either
case, the total weekly calorie consumption is the
same.
In the end, regardless of what method you choose to
use when approaching weight loss, what's important is
picking a strategy that works for you. Calorie counting
and zigzag calorie cycling are only two methods (that
are fairly interrelated) used to achieve weight loss
among many, and even within these methods, there
are many possible approaches a person can take.
Finding an approach that fits within your lifestyle that
you think you would be able to adhere to is likely going
to provide the most sustainable and desirable result.

How Many Calories Do You Need?

Many people seek to lose weight, and often the easiest
way to do this is to consume fewer calories each day.
But how many calories does the body actually need in
order to be healthy? This largely depends on the
amount of physical activity a person performs each
day, and regardless of this, is different for all people –
there are many different factors involved, not all of
which are well-understood or known.
Some factors that influence the number of calories a
person needs to remain healthy include age, weight,
height, sex, levels of physical activity, and overall
general health. For example, a physically active 25-
year-old male that is 6 feet in height requires
considerably higher calorie intake than a 5-foot-tall,
sedentary 70-year-old woman. Though it differs
depending on age and activity level, adult males
generally require 2,000-3000 calories per day to
maintain weight while adult females need around
1,600-2,400 according to the U.S Department of
Health.
The body does not require many calories to simply
survive. However, consuming too few calories results
in the body functioning poorly, since it will only use
calories for functions essential to survival, and ignore
those necessary for general health and well-being.
Harvard Health Publications suggests women get at
least 1,200 calories and men get at least 1,500
calories a day unless supervised by doctors. As such,
it is highly recommended that a person attempting to
lose weight monitors their body's caloric necessities
and adjusts them as necessary to maintain its
nutritional needs.

Calories: Different Kinds and Their

Effects
The main sources of calories in a typical person's diet
are carbohydrates, proteins, and fat, with alcohol also
being a significant portion of calorie intake for many
people (though ideally this should be limited since
alcohol contains many empty calories). Some studies
have shown that the calories displayed on nutrition
labels and the calories actually consumed and retained
can vary significantly. This hints at the complex nature
of calories and nutrition and is why many conflicting
points of view on the "best" methodology for losing
weight exist. For example, how a person chews their
food has been shown to affect weight loss to some
degree; generally speaking, chewing food more
increases the number of calories that the body burns
during digestion. People that chew more also tend to
eat less, since the longer period of time necessary to
chew their food allows more time to reach a state of
satiety, which results in eating less. However, the
effects of how food is chewed and digestion of different
foods are not completely understood and it is possible
that other factors exist, and thus this information
should be taken with a grain of salt (in moderation if
weight loss is the goal).
Generally, foods that take more effort to chew – fruit,
vegetables, lean meats, whole grains, etc. – require
the body to burn more calories since more calories are
required to digest them. It also results in the feeling of
satiety for longer periods of time. Furthermore, certain
foods like coffee, tea, chilies, cinnamon, and ginger
have been found to increase the rate of calories
burned, due to the ingredients they contain.
The "quality" of calories consumed is also important.
There are different classifications of foods in terms of
calories. This includes high-calorie foods, low-calorie
foods, and empty calories. Consistent with their
naming, high-calorie foods are foods that are
calorically dense, meaning that there are a high
number of calories relative to serving size, while low-
calorie foods have fewer calories relative to serving
size. Foods such as fat, oils, fried foods, and sugary
foods are examples of high-calorie foods. Being a
high-calorie food does not inherently mean that the
food is unhealthy however – avocados, quinoa, nuts,
and whole grains are all high-calorie foods that are
considered healthful in moderation. Low-calorie foods
include vegetables and certain fruits, among other
things, while empty calories, such as those in added
sugars and solid fats, are calories that contain few to
no nutrients. Studies have shown that there is a
measurable difference between consuming 500
calories of carrots compared to 500 calories of
popcorn. As previously mentioned, this in part can be
attributed to differences in how the foods are
consumed and processed. Carrots require far more
chewing and can result in more calories burned during
digestion. Again, the mechanism for these differences
is not fully defined, but simply note that for weight loss
purposes, the general formula of calories in minus
calories out determining weight gain or loss does hold,
but that the number of calories on a nutrition label is
not necessarily indicative of how many calories the
body actually retains. While there is no clear-cut or
ideal amount of macronutrient proportions a person
should consume to maintain a healthy diet or lose
weight, eating a "healthy" diet replete with a variety of
unprocessed foods such as vegetables, fruits, and
lean meats is correlated with being healthier, and is
more likely to result in sustainable weight loss. Also,
remember that calories from drinks comprise an
estimated 21% of a typical person's diet. Many of
these calories fall under the category of empty
calories. While sodas are an obvious culprit, drinks
such as juices and even milk have large amounts of
sugar and should be consumed in moderation to avoid
negating their nutritional benefits. Ideally, a person
should drink water, tea, and coffee without adding
sugar in order to reduce calories gained from drinks.
Remember: All foods, including "healthful foods,"
should be consumed in moderation, and distinctions
can often be misleading since even natural foods like
fruits can have large amounts of sugar, and foods
labeled as "health foods" such as low-calorie foods,
reduced-fat foods, etc. can potentially replace one
unhealthy component with another. Many reduced-fat
foods have large amounts of added sugar to
compensate for taste lost through fat reduction. It is
important to pay attention to, and consider the different
components in a food product in order to determine
whether said food should have a place within your diet.

Calories in Common Foods

Food Serving Size Calories kJ
Fruit
Apple 1 (4 oz.) 59 247
Banana 1 (6 oz.) 151 632
Grapes 1 cup 100 419
Orange 1 (4 oz.) 53 222
Pear 1 (5 oz.) 82 343
Peach 1 (6 oz.) 67 281
Pineapple 1 cup 82 343
Strawberry 1 cup 53 222
Watermelon 1 cup 50 209
Vegetables
Asparagus 1 cup 27 113
Broccoli 1 cup 45 188
Carrots 1 cup 50 209
Cucumber 4 oz. 17 71
Eggplant 1 cup 35 147
Lettuce 1 cup 5 21
Tomato 1 cup 22 92
Proteins
Beef, regular,
2 oz. 142 595
cooked
Chicken, cooked 2 oz. 136 569
Tofu 4 oz. 86 360
Egg 1 large 78 327
Fish, Catfish,
2 oz. 136 569
cooked
Pork, cooked 2 oz. 137 574
Shrimp, cooked 2 oz. 56 234
Common Meals/Snacks
Bread, white 1 slice (1 oz.) 75 314
Butter 1 tablespoon 102 427
Caesar salad 3 cups 481 2014
Cheeseburger 1 sandwich 285 1193
Hamburger 1 sandwich 250 1047
Dark Chocolate 1 oz. 155 649
Corn 1 cup 132 553
Pizza 1 slice (14") 285 1193
Potato 6 oz. 130 544
Rice 1 cup cooked 206 862
1 (6" Subway Turkey
Sandwich 200 837
Sandwich)
Beverages/Dairy
Beer 1 can 154 645
Coca-Cola Classic 1 can 150 628
Diet Coke 1 can 0 0
Milk (1%) 1 cup 102 427
Milk (2%) 1 cup 122 511
Milk (Whole) 1 cup 146 611
Orange Juice 1 cup 111 465
Apple cider 1 cup 117 490
Yogurt (low-fat) 1 cup 154 645
Yogurt (non-fat) 1 cup 110 461

* 1 cup = ~250 milliliters, 1 table spoon = 14.2 gram

2000, 1500, and 1200 Calorie Sample Meal

Plans
2000 Cal
Meal 1200 Cal Plan 1500 Cal Plan
Plan
BreakfastAll-bran cereal (125) Granola (120) Buttered toast
Milk (50) Greek yogurt (120) (150)
Banana (90) Blueberries (40) Egg (80)
Banana (90)
Almonds (170)
Snack Cucumber (30) Orange (70) Greek yogurt
Avocado dip (50) (120)
Blueberries
(40)
Total 345 Calories 350 Calories 650 Calories

Lunch Grilled cheese with Chicken and Grilled chicken

tomato (300) vegetable soup (300) (225)
Salad (50) Bread (100) Grilled
vegetables
(125)
Pasta (185)
Snack Walnuts (100) Apple (75) Hummus (50)
Peanut butter (75) Baby carrots
(35)
Crackers (65)
Total 450 Calories 550 Calories 685 Calories

Dinner Grilled Chicken Steak (375) Grilled salmon

(200) Mashed potatoes (225)
Brussel sprouts (150) Brown rice
(100) Asparagus (75) (175)
Quinoa (105) Green beans
(100)
Walnuts (165)
Total 405 Calories 600 Calories 665 Calories

Calories Burned from Common

Exercises:
125 lb 155 lb 185 lb
Activity (1 hour)
person person person
Golf (using cart) 198 246 294
Walking (3.5 mph) 215 267 319
Kayaking 283 352 420
Softball/Baseball 289 359 428
Swimming (free-style,
397 492 587
moderate)
Tennis (general) 397 492 587
Running (9 minute mile) 624 773 923
Bicycling (12-14 mph,
454 562 671
moderate)
Football (general) 399 494 588
Basketball (general) 340 422 503
Soccer (general) 397 492 587

Energy from Common Food

Components
Food kJ per Calorie kJ per Calorie
Components gram (kcal) per ounce (kcal) per
gram ounce
Fat 37 8.8 1,049 249
Proteins 17 4.1 482 116
Carbohydrates 17 4.1 482 116
Fiber 8 1.9 227 54
Ethanol (drinking
29 6.9 822 196
alcohol)
Organic acids 13 3.1 369 88
Polyols (sugar
alcohols, 10 2.4 283 68
sweeteners)

about us | sitemap
terms of use | privacy policy
© 2008 - 2023 calculator.net