Republic of the Philippines

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY

COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, Tacurong City
RUBRICS FOR THE PROPOSAL DEFENSE

Program: 11 – STEM __2nd__Semester A.Y. 2023

Title of the Study: DURIAN (DURIO ZIBENTHINUS L.) HUSK AS BIOPLASTIC

Research Adviser: VIVIALYN C. ASOY, MAT

Date of Completion: 2 – MONTHS

Directions: Analyze the research output based on the following criteria below. Check the appropriate
column (5 as the highest and 1 as the lowest) indicating your evaluation.

INTRODUCTION
Indicators 5 4 3 2 1

1. The introduction consists of an adequate introductory discussion of the problem

2. Factors that led to the problem are well-discussed

3. The in-text citations are properly and clearly presented in the literature review.

4. The Literature Review is comprehensively done by the researchers, and they only
stated research relevant to their study.
5. Conceptual framework adequately supports the main problem or the title of the
study.
6. The gap of knowledge of the study is clearly and specifically stated to convince the
readers of the need to conduct such study.
7. The statement of the problem was thoroughly presented.
8. In general, the manuscript is scholarly written and has a global impact in the
educational context as a whole.

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
1. Cited literature and studies are adequate and relevant to the research problem
following APA format, 7th Edition.
2. Related literature and studies are recent (five years ago to the present year of the
study).
3. Foreign literature, studies, literature and local studies are present.
4. Synthesis of the reviewed literature and studies is well-organized, concise (not too
long nor too short), and is based on the researchers’ logical analysis of the cited
materials.
5. The sources of the cited literature and studies are appropriately acknowledged and
or credited.
6. The researchers were able to determine the construct and variable of their study
from the theory presented.
7. The framework presented conceptualizes the concepts of the theory appropriately.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
1. The research methodology is well-described and is suitable or fitting to the
research problem.
2. The participants of the study are well-described in terms of the sample profile,
sample size and sampling technique and or procedure.
3. The research locale is described in terms of its location, historical background,
purposes and objectives, and or mission and vision of the instruction or organization
4. The procedure and or techniques of gathering data are explained in complete
detail beginning from the time the researchers sought permission to conduct the
study.
5. The research instrument is presented and discussed in terms of its validity and
reliability (in the case of a self-made instrument).
6. The research design and method employed by the researchers are correct and
relevant to the fulfillment of the accurate results of the study.
7. The statistical tool selected is appropriate to gather the needed data and answer
the problem of the study.
8. The statistical tool is brief and accurately used to answer the queries or objectives
of the study.
OVER-ALL TOTAL

Remarks

______________________
Signature Over Printed Name