Article Critique by John Carlo Dayson
Article Critique by John Carlo Dayson
Article Critique
In
Geology for Civil Engineering
Introduction……………………………………………………………….…….1-2
Critique…………………………………………………………………………...5
Conclusion………………………………………………………………………..6
Reference…………………………………………………………………………7
Article………………………………………………………………….……...8-14
Article Source Title:
Constraints on the depth, geometry and
kinematics of blind detachment faults
provided by fault-propagation folds: An
example from the Mesozoic fold belt of
South China.
B. Introduction.
Propagation chevron folding and thrust faulting are features of the South China
Mesozoic multi-layered thin-skinned fold belt. We use faults and folds that crop out along a
well-defined cross-section to analyze the geometry and depth of blind detachment faults in
this belt. The geometry and depth of the detachment faults are estimated using new equations
that combine several parameters, including the back limb dip angle, the inter-limb angle, the
height of the anticline, the thickness of the referenced layer, the width of the anticline, and
the thickness-change ratio of layering within the forelimb. The Huangdushan chevron
anticline's specifications in the cross-section show a blind fault with a ramp angle of 42 and a
segment that is flattened at a depth of 4.9 km. We interpret this blind fault as a back thrust
that occurred over an in-sequence imbricated duplex of Cambrian to Ordovician strata based
on the seismic data already available. A back thrust fault may also be seen in a chevron
anticlinal at Qiyueshan. However, at depths of 7.4 and 3.4 km, respectively, a large anticline
flat detachment fault with flat segments, indicating that the Sinian strata were likely
thickened by an out-of-sequence imbricated duplex. Our findings show that the out-of-
sequence imbricated duplex and cylindrical sinusoidal folds were created by the flat-ramp-
flat detachment fault along the bottom of the Sinian strata. Back thrusts and accompanying
chevron anticlines were formed by the in-sequence imbricated duplex. We believe that the
Yangtze Block and North China Blocks colliding is what caused this fault-related fold belt.
This article was received on the date of March 7, 2008, and it was revised on the month of
October day 14 the same year when it was released. It was accepted on the day of 6 of the
1|Page
month of November in the same year. Then it was published in the media or online what call
fault-related fold belt is found in South China. The Late Paleozoic to Early Mesozoic
the west and north, respectively, divide the Yangtze Block from the North China Block.
The metamorphic basement is made up of the Banxi Group and its counterparts from the
Yangtze Block, which are of Meso- to Neoproterozoic age and is composed of a well-bedded
folded Sinian layers made up of tillites and limestones, as well as folded Paleozoic and
Lower Mesozoic strata of shallow-marine origin. The Sinian strata are followed in age by
strata of black shale, sandstone, and limestone interbedded with dolostone from the
siltstone from the Silurian, fine-grained sandstone from the Devonian, clastic rocks and
limestones from the Carboniferous, and carbonate-rich rocks from the Permian. Thin layers
of limestone are found in the Triassic strata, along with marl and shale. Continental clastic
sequences make up all of the strata from the Jurassic, Cretaceous, and Cenozoic periods.
2|Page
C. Summary.
The fault-propagation fold parameters can be used to calculate the blind fault parameters
of a, f0, h0, and TP. These fault parameters are sufficient to constrain the exact location,
geometry, and kinematic characteristics of the blind detachment fault in the thin-skinned
fold-propagation model. Anticline parameters from the variable fold types in the geological
section are applied to determine the geometry and depth of the detachment fault. All thrust
faults have increasing displacement along the ramp, constant displacement along the flat, and
a reference point near or at the point of origin in the displacement–distance graphs. These
graphs show the characteristics of propagation folds over a flat ramp-type thrust fault,
although the exact points have been eroded for some of the outcropping faults.
The detachment fault along the base of the Sinian strata dominates the multi-layer, fault-
related fold system due to the lithological contrast between the Sinian strata and the basement
rocks of the Banxi Group. The floor thrust and roof thrust dip down the transport direction at
the southeast end, related to the overall gentle northwest dip on the surface. Geometrical data
and depth constraints on detachment faults provided in this paper allow a 3-stage kinematic
The first stage involves the formation of a chevron anticline on the hanging wall by a
flat-ramp-flat type thrust fault in which the fault tip is located at the inflection point.
The second stage is the gradual change from a chevron anticline to a box or open
anticline as the fault tip moves away from the inflection point along the flat, and a new
3|Page
The final stage involves the formation of the fault-related fold style. The southeast-
The development of the Mesozoic detachment faults has significant implications for the
origin of the Mesozoic fault–fold belt in South China. Hsu proposed a Mesozoic continental
collision between the Yangtze and Cathaysian Blocks involving the over thrusting of a
Mesozoic ophiolite onto the foreland thrust belt to explain the observed deformation, but this
model is not well supported by the geological evidence. Li and Li have recently proposed a
flat-slab subduction model for Mesozoic South China to explain the development of a broad
which is further supported by our study. This event was produced by a collision between
South China and North China Blocks which took place in a scissor-like fashion along the
4|Page
D. Critique.
The material shows its purpose from the start until the end. And in this article, I have
proposed to be used to write a critique you will see different names of a person that are
involved in writing this article and also to prove to the readers that the info that is written on
it is not just rumored what we call. As I’ve said earlier the material shows its purpose
because it has strong pieces of evidence that can prove its legitimacy. You can see a lot of
diagrams that show happenings, and formulas that the writers use on calculation. By the
diagram given on the material that I used, I see many active fault lines many years later. It is
good for some professional engineers to know this kind of info because as engineers they
need to know if in the area that they are going to build some infrastructure like houses,
buildings, etc. they needed to check first if there is an active fault line. And I see the purpose
of this material is to inform not just engineers but us the people of our society need to be
aware of this kind of information because sooner or later it is a big advantage to you and for
your family’s safety. I can say that it is a shred of good evidence that this article has a
purpose.
And in the depth and geometry of blind thrust, faults can be constrained by fault-
propagation fold parameters, such as rear limb dip angle, inter-limb angle, the height of the
anticline, thickness of the referenced layer, width of the anticline, and thickness change ratio
of layering inside the forelimb. This method is used to investigate the South Chinese thin-
synclines connected to thrust faults. The in-sequence imbricated duplex's back thrusting and
5|Page
E. Conclusion.
To conclude this critique and to explain further some unfamiliar words that lead to the
reader to hardly understand the concept of this article. These are the unfamiliar words that
you may encounter anticline, imbricated duplex, and many more. That I think needed to
expand the meaning of this word or to be exact change the words that the other readers hard
to appreciate or understand.
To the intent of this material now I prove that it is not appropriate or suitable to all
readers who encounter this material because if your profession is not aligned with this kind
of mastery how would you understand this material? For example, you are a professional
nurse, or let’s say you are just a normal person now how would you intend to understand it?
And there are a lot of formulas used in the material also diagrams. And there is some point
that you wouldn’t analyze the language used in the material. But the content of this material
is complete and somehow precise. It also gives good evidence and info that may be used by
Lastly, as I can imagine while I am reading this article as a reader this material might be
people or authors what we call. And there are some bias points because the reader who can
understand this material is the one who is aligned with their profession with the topic of this
material. And I would recommend this piece to all engineers with structural mastery.
6|Page
F. Reference
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281221687_Journal_of_Structural_Geology
Bing Zhang
Guoqing Wei
Hong-Lin Song
Shao-Feng Liu
7|Page