MCCB
MCCB
replacement?
The 3 phase Molded Case Circuit Breakers (mccb) used in commercial and industrial sites
handle much more energy than the average household single phase miniature circuit breakers
(mcb). It, therefore, poses a much greater risk during a fault if the component is not working
properly.
Do not simply replace a Molded Case Circuit Breaker with one that has the same rated current.
The most important consideration is the Ultimate short-circuit breaking capacity (Icu).
Incorrectly replacing MCCB will result in dangerous consequences. In this video, we will guide
you through the step by step process to do this.
1. Frame Size
2. Rated Current
3. Ultimate Short-Circuit Breaking Capacity (Icu)
Other factors that may be important for your application are as follow:
Frame Size
This determines the dimension of a circuit breaker. You will obviously have to select the
MCCB with the frame size that can fit the space. The Frame Size indicates the basic framework
of the Plastic shell of the MCCB that can hold the biggest rated current. It is the maximum
current that a particular frame housing is designed for.
There are varieties current ratings MCCB for the same frame size. The following Schneider
Electric Series has the same frame size:
Rated Current
The rated current is the current value which overload protection is tripped and disconnect the
circuit. You will obviously need to select the same rated current as the MCCB being replaced.
For an MCCB it is possible to have the option to adjust the Amp Trip (the current that the
breaker trip) to that below the Amp Frame (The maximum overload protection current)
When replacing an existing MCCB, be sure to check this!
After interrupting short-circuit fault two times, it does not mean that the circuit breaker will fail
to protect the circuit, it simply means that it has not been tested for.
It is also good to note that the higher the Icu for an MCCB is an indication of the higher MCCB
quality.
The MCCB to be replaced is rated at 20kA for the 3-phase 415V. This is a typical value used in
Singapore, however, please note that for different voltages the Icu values are different. Please
ensure that you look at the Icu value for your particular operation.
1 The contacts in the circuit breaker welded together preventing the circuit breaker from
tripping. This will heat up the cable in the circuit.
Example replacements
LV429550 (original model)
Range name Tmax XT
Model XT1B 160 TMD 100-1000 3p F F
Poles 3 Pole(s)
Rated current 100A
Ultimate short-circuit current breaking capacity (Icu)
o (380-415Vac) 18 kA
Service short-circuit current breaking capacity (Ics)
o (380-415Vac) 18 kA
Service short-circuit current breaking capacity as a percentage of Icu (Ics%)
o (380-415Vac) 100 %
Dimension (WxHxD) 76.2x130x70 mm
Brand ABB
1SDA067397R1
Range name Tmax XT
Model XT1C 160 TMD 100-1000 3p F F
Poles 3 Pole(s)
Rated current 100A
Ultimate short-circuit current breaking capacity (Icu)
o (380-415Vac) 25 kA
Service short-circuit current breaking capacity (Ics)
o (380-415Vac) 25 kA
Service short-circuit current breaking capacity as a percentage of Icu (Ics%)
o (380-415Vac) 100 %
Dimension (WxHxD) 76.2x130x70 mm
Brand ABB
Icu = 40kA
Ics = 50% (i.e. 20kA)
Case 1: the Short-circuit current is at 15kA
This is below both the Icu and Ics and therefore we can assume that it can clear a fault 3 times as
tested by the manufacturer.
In practice, one would try to have the exact model replacement, and when this is not possible, the
take away is to look at the kA value carefully to avoid any dangerous consequences.
Icu is really the maximum perspective fault which a circuit breaker can clear (with the fault current being
expressed as rms for ac). This is verified by testing in accordance with the standard and is applicable at
a specific set of electrical and environmental conditions. If these conditions change then it may be
necessary to derate the circuit breaker. After clearing a fault the circuit breaker does not have to remain
serviceable and could be dangerous to operate. This point is particularly important in circuit breakers
when the Ics is lower than the Icu.
Difference between Icu and Ics
When tested against the standard, circuit breakers under go the following tests:
Icu is subject to an O-t-CO sequence. The breaker is then certified safe by a simple dielectric test.
Ics is subject to an O-t-CO-t-CO sequence. The breaker is then subject to both dielectric withstand and temperature
rise tests.
O - breaking operation
CO - making operation followed by breaking
operation
t - time interval (short as possible, but minimum
of 3 minutes)
Tests are carried out at the specified fault current.
Ics is the maximum perspective fault current which the circuit breaker can clear and still remain
serviceable. The standard does allow some minor welding of the contacts to take place, so after a large
fault it would still be necessary to inspect the breaker. When specified as a percentage of Ics, the standard
proposes ranges of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%.
Icw is the perspective fault withstand rating (rms for ac). Circuit breakers may be subject to through fault
which they are not intended to clear. While not clearing these faults, the breaker will still need to
withstand the thermal and mechanical stress imposed by the fault current. The longer a fault is present
the more the effects build up and Icw always has a time element associated with it (i.e. 50 kA for 1
second). The standard specified preferred time ranges of 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 second (although 3
seconds is also often used in practice).
Icm is the peak current which the circuit breaker can safely break or make. It is expressed as the maximum
perspective peak current at a rated voltage, frequency and power factor and is always greater than I cu.
From a safety aspect this is particularly important as it will be the primary mechanism to protect the
operator if the circuit breaker is closed on to a fault.
All ratings are derived under specific electrical and environmental conditions and are verified with the
circuit breaker in free air. As soon as the breaker is enclosed in in any kind of panel or cabinet the ratings
change and need to be re-assessed as part of the assembly testing.
It should now be obvious that all the fault parameters need to be considered in selecting the correct circuit
breaker. I think a lot of people reading this have seen specification clauses like, "circuit breakers shall be
rated at 50 kA for 3 seconds", with no other details. When I see statements like this my first impression
(rightly or wrongly), is that I'm reading a poor specification. I would encourage everyone to be specific in
their specification of what they require and address I cu, Ics, Icw and Icm as part of the specification.
I've also noticed that in general for most of the big manufacturers the majority of their ranges have an
Ics equal to the Icu. If I'm presented with a breaker where this is not the case, I immediately become
sceptical on the quality of the device. The device may well be suitable for the application, but I would be
more vigilant on my appraisal of the circuit breaker. I tend always specify that the Ics should equal the Icu -
to my mind, what is the point of a circuit breaker if it can't be readily reused after tripping.
Something else to bear in mind is that the rating vary depending on the voltage. For low voltage, we are
talking anything from 1000 V down to zero. The lower the voltage the higher the rating (for example, a
Schneider NW12 H2 breaker has an Icu = 100 kA at 415 V, and this drops to 85 kA at 525 V). Icw is also
dependent on time (the longer the fault the lower will be the rating). Often Icm is larger than Icu or Ics - make
sure you are looking at the right figures and if you are interested in the I cu it should be Icu you are being
shown and not Icm.
As a final bit of advice - always consult manufacturers catalogues and technical data. Manufacturer's
produce a whole range of devices, and you need to select the correct one for your application. There is
no point paying for higher rating if you don't need to. At the same time compromising on ratings to have a
cheaper circuit breaker jeopardizes safety and operational reliability.