Department of Education

Region VIII
BORONGAN CITY DIVISION
STA. FE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sta. Fe, Borongan City

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: EVELYN GUIMBA ARCA Name of Rater: ROLANDO B. CALIBA
Position: TEACHER III Position: PRINCIPAL III
Bureau/Center/Service/Div
DEPED-BORONGAN CITY DIVISION-STA. FE NHS Date of Review: FEBRUARY 9, 2023
Rating Period: August 01 2022 - July 31, 2023

Mid-year Review Rating

Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
Performance Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Classroom observation
Education Knowledge knowledge of tool (COT) rating sheet
Services and content within and/or inter-agreement
Pedagogy and across form/s done through onsite Quality
curriculum / face-to-face / in-
teaching areas. classroom observation.

7.0% Efficiency

If onsite / face-to-face /
in-person classes are not
implemented,
*through Timeliness
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
Basic 2. Used a range other modalities;
Classroom or
observation
Education of teaching tool (COT)*through
rating sheet
Services strategies that observation
and/or of a
inter-agreement Quality
enhance learner demonstration
form/s teaching
done through onsite
achievement in /*via LAC session
face-to-face / in-
literacy and classroom observation.
numeracy skills

7.0% Efficiency
 numeracy skills

7.0% Mid-year Review Rating

Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
Performance Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
If onsite / face-to-face /
in-person classes are not
implemented,
*through Timeliness
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a Classroom observation
Education Knowledge range of tool (COT) rating sheet
Services and teaching and/or inter-agreement
Pedagogy strategies to form/s done through onsite
develop critical / face-to-face / in- Quality
and creative classroom observation.
thinking, as well
as other higher-
order thinking
skills. 7.0%

If onsite / face-to-face /
in-person classes are not Efficiency
implemented,
*through
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed other modalities;
Classroom or
observation
Education Environment classroom tool (COT) rating sheet
Services and Diversity structure to and/or inter-agreement
engage learners,
of Learners form/s done through onsite
individually or in Quality
groups, in / face-to-face / in-
meaningful classroom observation.
exploration,
discovery and
hands-on activities
within a range of 7.0%
physical learning
environments.
If onsite / face-to-face /
in-person classes are not Efficiency
implemented,
*through
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 5. Managed other modalities;
Classroom or
observation
Education Environment learner behavior tool (COT)*through
rating sheet
Services and Diversity constructively by observation of a
and/or inter-agreement
of Learners applying positive demonstration
form/s teaching
done through onsite
and non-violent /*via LAC session
face-to-face / in- Quality
Basic 2. Learning 5. Managed Classroom observation Mid-year Review Rating
Mid-year Review
MFOs Environment
Education KRAs Objectives
learner behavior Timeline Weight tool
Means
(COT)ofrating
Verification
sheet Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Services and Diversity constructively by and/or inter-agreement
Results
Performance Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
of Learners applying positive form/s done through onsite
and non-violent / face-to-face / in- Quality
discipline to classroom observation.
ensure learning-
focused
environments.
7.0%

If onsite / face-to-face /
Efficiency
in-person classes are not
implemented,
*through
observation of
synchronous / Timeliness
asynchronous teaching in
Basic 2. Learning 6. Used Classroom observation
other modalities; or
Education Environment differentiated, tool (COT) rating sheet
*through
Services and Diversity developmentally and/or inter-agreement
observation of a
of Learners appropriate form/s done through
demonstration onsite
teaching
learning / face-to-face / in- Quality
*via LAC session
experiences to classroom observation.
address
learners' gender,
needs,
strengths, 7.0%
interests and
experiences.
If onsite / face-to-face /
in-person classes are not Efficiency
implemented,
*through
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in Timeliness
other modalities; or
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Classroom observation
*through
Education and Planning managed and tool (COT) rating
observation of a sheet
Services implemented and/or inter-agreement
demonstration teaching
developmentally form/s
*via LAC done through onsite
session
sequenced / face-to-face / in- Quality
teaching and classroom observation.
learning
processes to
meet curriculum
requirements 7.0%
and varied
teaching
contexts. If onsite / face-to-face /
in-person classes are not Efficiency
implemented,
 meet curriculum
requirements 7.0%
and varied Mid-year Review Rating
Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight
teaching Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
contexts. If onsite / face-to-face / Performance Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
in-person classes are not Efficiency
implemented,
*through
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in Timeliness
other modalities; or
*through
observation of a
demonstration teaching
*via LAC session

Basic 3. Curriculum 8. Partiipated in 1. Proof/s of attendance in

Education and Planning collegial LAC sessions / FGDs /
Services & discussions that meetings / other collegial
Assessment use teacher and discussions
and learner feedback 2. Minutes of LAC
Reporting to enrich sessions / FGDs /
teaching meetings / other collegial Quality
practice discussions on use of
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice
3.
Reflection notes of
7.0% teachers on their
demonstration of teaching
practices following
participation from LAC Efficiency
sessions / FGDs /
meetings / other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice with
proof of attendance
4. Any Timeliness
equivalent ALS form/
document that highlights
the objective
Basic 3. Curriculum 9. Selected. Classroom observation
Education and Planning Developed, tool (COT) rating sheet
Services organized and and/or inter-agreement
used appropriate form/s done through onsite
teaching and / face-to-face / in- Quality
learning classroom observation.
resources,
including ICT, to
Basic 3. Curriculum 9. Selected.
Education and Planning Developed,
Services organized and Mid-year Review Rating
Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs used appropriate Timeline Weight Means of Verification
Objectives Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
teaching and Quality Results
Performance Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
learning classroom observation.
resources,
including ICT, to
address learning
goals. 7.0%

If onsite / face-to-face /
in-person classes are not Efficiency
implemented,
*through
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in Timeliness

Basic 4. 10. Designed, Classroom observation

Education Assessment selected, tool (COT) rating sheet
Services and organized and and/or inter-agreement
Reporting used diagnostic, form/s done through onsite
formative and / face-to-face / in- Quality
summative classroom observation.
assessment
strategies
consistent with
curriculum 7.5%
requirements.

If onsite / face-to-face /
in-person classes are not Efficiency
implemented,
*through
observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored Any
otherone (1) of theor
modalities;
Education and evaluated following:
*through
Services learner progress *Individual
observation of a
and Learning Monitoring
demonstration Plan Quality
teaching
achievement (ILMP)
*via LAC session *Peer
using learner Assessment Data
attainment data. *Sample of learners' output
with reflection / self -
Basic 11. Monitored Any one (1) of the
Education and evaluated following:
Services learner progress *Individual Mid-year Review Rating
Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs andObjectives Timeline Weight Learning
MeansMonitoring Plan Quality
of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
achievement (ILMP) *Peer Performance Target Results
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
using learner Assessment Data
attainment data. *Sample of learners' output
with reflection / self -
assessment
7.0% *Progress charts/ Efficiency
anecdotal records

*Class/e-class record/
grading sheets
*Lesson plans
showing index of mastery
Timeliness
*Frequency of errors with
identified least/most
mastered skills

Basic 4. *Any equivalent ALS form/

Education Assessment document that highlights
Services and the objective (e.g.,
Reporting Individual Learning
7.5% Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
*Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)

Basic 12. Any one (1) of the

Education Communicated following:
Services promptly and *A sample of corrected test
clearly the paper of a learner in in a
learners' needs, learning area with parent's
progress and or guardian's signature
achievement to and date of receipt
key *Minutes of
stakeholders, meetings with key Quality
including stakeholders (e.g., PTA,
parents/ SGC, SPT, CPC) with
guardians proof of attendance
*Report card with parent's
or guardian's signature in
all quarters supported by
7.0% minutes of meeting

*Communication with key

stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/ guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using
 *Report card with parent's
or guardian's signature in
all quarters supported by
7.0% minutes of meeting Mid-year Review Rating
Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
*Communication with key Performance Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/ guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using
various modalities
*Anecdotal
record showing entries per Timeliness
quarter
*Any equivalent ALS form/
document that highlights
the objective
*Others
(please specify and
provide annotations)
Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a A Refelection/journal entry
Education Growth and personal that highlights the
Services Professional philosophy of application of a learner- Quality
Development teaching that is centered teaching
learner-centered philosophy in the lesson
7.0% plan or community work

Timeliness

Basic 14. Set 1. Certification from the

Education professional ICT Coordinator / School
Services development Head / Focal Person in Quality
goals based on charge of e-SAT
the Philippine 2. IPCRF-
Professional DP
Standards for 7.0% 3. Mid-year Review
Teachers Form (MRF) Efficiency

4. Updated
IPCRF-DP from Phase II Timeliness

Basic 13. Performed Any one (1) proof of:

Education various related *Committee involvement
Services works/activities
that contribute to *Involvement as module/
the teaching- learning material writer/
learning validator
process. *Involvement as a Quality
resource
person/speaker/learning
facilitator in the RO/SDO/
school-initiated TV/radio-
based instruction;
*Book
or journal authorship/ co-
 resource
person/speaker/learning
facilitator in the RO/SDO/ Mid-year Review Rating
Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight school-initiated
Means of Verification
TV/radio- Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
based instruction; Performance Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
*Book
or journal authorship/ co-
authorship/
2% coordinatorship/
chairperson
*participation in
Efficiency
demonstration teaching
*participation as
research presenter in a
forum/ conference
*conducted
research within the rating
period; 10.
Others (Please specify)
with annotation on how it
contribute to the teaching- Timeliness
learning process

ROWENA P. LATOJA EVELYN GUIMBA-ARCA ROLANDO B. CALIBA

Rater Ratee Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: EVELYN GUIMBA-ARCA Name of Rater: HAZEL B. MENESES

Position: Teacher III Position: Principal I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd Borongan City Division-Sta. Fe National High School Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Weight per KRA Objectives Score
Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% #NAME? ### #NAME? #NAME?
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% #NAME? ### #NAME? #NAME?
Objective 3 7.5% #NAME? ### #NAME? #NAME?
Objective 4 7.5% #NAME? ### #NAME? #NAME?
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% #NAME? ### #NAME? #NAME?
Objective 6 7.5% #NAME? ### #NAME? #NAME?
Objective 7 7.5% #NAME? ### #NAME? #NAME?
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% #NAME? ### #NAME? #NAME?
Objective 9 7.5% #NAME? ### #NAME? #NAME?
Objective 10 7.5% #NAME? ### #NAME? #NAME?
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% #NAME? ### ### #NAME? #NAME?
Objective 12 7.5% #NAME? ### ### #NAME? #NAME?
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% #NAME? ### #NAME? #NAME?
Adjectival Rating #NAME?
Final Rating #NAME?

EVELYN G. ARCA HAZEL B. MENESES ALUDIA N. BADILLA, Ph.D.

Ratee Rater Approving Authority