Communication
Communication
1. NATURE OF
COMMUNICATION
I. COMMUNICATION
Communication is a dual or two-way process of transmitting messages
from one person to another. It is also a symbolic interaction between two
or more people that influences each other’s behavior. With it, not only
does one make his/her own self understood, but s/he also gets to
understand others.
Communication is the broad term for the two-way dynamic process of
message transmission. It embraces both the verbal and the nonverbal
aspects.
• The VERBAL includes the modes, which are signing, reading, writing,
speaking, and listening.
• The NONVERBAL comprises extralinguistic elements, such as
paralinguistic, metalinguistic, and non-linguistic. These elements enhance
the meaning of what words say.
II. ELEMENTS OF
COMMUNICATION
Sender - The speaker or communicator who has his/her own purpose,
knowledge, interests, attitudes, skills, and credibility.
Nonlinguistic Elements
- These are the devices used in conveying messages without entirely
relying on language. These non-speech elements fall under seven
categories
Paralinguistic Elements
are the aspects of spoken
communication that do not involve
words. These may add emphasis or shades of meaning to what people say.
Some definitions limit this to verbal communication that is not words.
METALINGUISTIC ELEMENTS
– Is the abstract element that takes place in the mind of communicators –
their awareness of the component units of language – sound, words,
phrases, and sentences. This enables the language user to think about
language independently of his/her comprehension and production
abilities, talk about it, analyze it, and judge it as to its correctness or
appropriateness. This linguistic intuition makes him/her decision about
the grammatical acceptability of the language s/he produces and receives.
2. MODELS OF
COMMUNICATION
Communication Models
“The Art Of Communication Is The Language Of Leadership. ” (James
Humes)
To communicate properly, one cannot simply strive to express oneself
and leave understanding to fate; one must also learn how to organize
one’s thoughts, control one’s emotions, use one’s words to articulate
concepts and arguments, and express oneself in the best way
possible.
According to James Berlin (1982), one of the major proponents of the
New Rhetoric, “In teaching writing, we are not simply offering
training in a useful technical skill that is meant as a simple
complement to the more important studies of other areas. We are
teaching a way of experiencing the world, a way of ordering and
making sense of it” (776) whether this is in writing, reading, listening,
or speaking - these are the tools that help us analyze, critique, and
negotiate
According to Denis Mcquail and Sven Windahl (2013), in their book
Communication Models For The Study Of Mass Communications, “a
model seeks to show the main elements of any structure or process
and the relationship between these elements…it helps in explaining
by providing in a simplifies way information which would otherwise
be complicated or ambiguous.” (2)
Professor Ramona S. Flores (2016), in her book Oral Communication
In Context, discusses four models of communication in the chapter,
“Explaining the Nature of Communication.”
Aristotle (around 5 B.C.) explains that speakers should adjust their
messages according to their audience and the occasion to achieve a
particular effect.
David Belo, S-M-C-R emphasizes the four components of the
communication process. These are the sender, message, channel, and
receiver. This model focuses on encoding and decoding.
Harold D. Lasswell (1902-1978), this model is often used as an
analysis tool for evaluating the communication process and
components., this is also used for interpersonal communication or
group communication to disseminate messages to various situations.
He talked about the relation between the presentation of facts and
how it generates different effects. This model is more focused on the
outcome and generally used for media persuasion.
Wilbur Schramm in the late 1940s. It provides a straightforward
approach to communicating, with sender and receiver trading back
and forth in a circular pattern. In this model, pay attention to the role
of the interpreter. Encoding and decoding are not automatic
processes both go through the filter of the interpreter., a message
may succeed or fail, based on the interpreter’s appreciation of the
message. There are times when the sender and receiver may apply
different meanings to the same message, and this is termed
“Semantic noise” (Communicative Theories.org).
Shannon-Weaver’s Model of Communication model was created by
Claude Shannon and Warren Weaver (Flores, 2016)… According to
Flores (2016), this is also often called the “Telephone Mode,” since it
was developed because of the technology and the experience of the
“noise” coming from the switchboard.
For the message to reach the receiver, there must be a common field
of experience between the sender and the receiver. According to
Sneha Mishara (2017), this field of experience may constitute
“culture, social background, beliefs, experiences, values, and rules.
According to White, it is possible to begin at any of the stages
outlined in his model. People are under the mistaken impression that
when communicating, we usually start with thinking, but that is not
necessarily the case… The most important contribution from Eugene
White’s model is the concept of feedback, which can only be
processed by the speaker if he or she has been monitoring the
audience or the listener. Hence, the speaker must also pay attention
to the listener’s verbal and non-verbal cues (Flores, 2016).
To be a good communicator, one needs to pay attention to how people
are responding to the message and adjust accordingly, rather than
being preoccupied with simply expressing oneself.
3.ETHICS IN
COMMUNICATION
- It is important to understand that whatever we communicate should
be guided by certain ethical principles. the US National
Communication Association (NCA, 1999) discusses this in their Credo
for Ethical Communication, stating that, “Ethical Communication is
fundamental to responsible thinking, decision-making, and the
development of relationships and communities within and across
contexts, cultures, channels, and media…”
WHAT IS ETHICS?
– is derived from the Greek word ethos which means characteristic
way of acting
– Ethos includes cultural mannerism, religion, politics, laws and social
aspirations of a group of people
– A science of the morality of human acts …actions reflect the motive
of the doer
– Study of motivation, and ultimately of human behavior. Moreover,
ethical communication enhances human worth and dignity by
fostering truthfulness, fairness, responsibility, personal integrity, and
respect for self and others. We believe that unethical communication
threatens the quality of all communication and consequently the well-
being of individuals and the society in which we live.
FOUR PRINCIPLES OF
COMMUNICATION
(RELEVANT FOR STUDENTS TODAY)
1. “advocate truthfulness, accuracy, honesty, and reason as essential
to the integrity of communication” (NCA, 1999)
It is important to be reasonable, rather than to be too
emotional or threatening when we communicate.
2. “freedom of expression”, diversity of perspective, and tolerance of
dissent to achieve the informed and responsible decision-making
fundamental to civil society” (NCA, 1999)
It is important to foster an environment where people feel
safe enough to express what they think and feel, and for these
expressions to be met with reasonable dialogue and debate,
rather than outright censure or violence.
3. “condemn communication that degrades individuals and humanity
through distortion, intimidation, coercion, and violence, and
through the expression of intolerance and hatred” (NCA, 1999)
This condemnation is important because it safeguards society
from racism, sexism, and violence against oppressed people.
4. “Accept responsibility for the short and long-term consequences of
our own communication and expect the same of others”
There are people who do not feel accountable for their
actions… if one risks communicating maliciously, spreading
false news, or inciting hatred or violence, he or she should be
ready to face the consequences of such action.
Every time we communicate, we should consider the consequences of our
actions. If people were more responsible in their use of communication,
there would be less conflict in this world. Even though the four principles
above are short and concise, they are important, because they help us
discern the difference between ethical and unethical communicators.