Smepa 2022-2023
Smepa 2022-2023
S. Y. 2022 – 2023
School monitoring and evaluation are essential components of ensuring the effectiveness and efficiency
of educational institutions. They play a crucial role in assessing the performance of schools, identifying
areas for improvement, and enhancing the overall quality of education. However, it is equally important
to have a comprehensive plan for monitoring and evaluating schools that allows for regular adjustments.
This adjustable monitoring and evaluation plan help in adapting to the dynamic nature of education. The
field of education is constantly evolving, with new methodologies, technologies, and standards emerging.
Therefore, a static monitoring and evaluation plan may become obsolete over time and fail to provide an
accurate assessment of the school's performance. By regularly reviewing and adjusting the plan, schools
can ensure that it aligns with the latest educational trends and requirements, leading to more accurate
evaluations and improved outcomes.
Adjustments can be made to focus on areas that require improvement, such as student achievement,
teaching quality, infrastructure, or community engagement. This targeted approach enables schools to
address their specific challenges effectively, leading to better overall performance and growth.
Furthermore, regular adjustments to the monitoring and evaluation plan promote stakeholder
involvement and participation. The success of a school depends not only on its administration and
teachers but also on the collaboration and engagement of students, parents, and the wider community.
By involving all stakeholders in the process of evaluating the school's performance and adjusting the
plan, a sense of ownership and accountability is fostered. This promotes a shared responsibility for the
school's success and ensures that the evaluation process remains transparent and inclusive.
Effective and efficient school monitoring and evaluation play a vital role in ensuring the overall success
and improvement of educational institutions. The implementation of a comprehensive assessment
framework that includes both quantitative and qualitative measures. This could involve regular
standardized testing to gauge students' academic performance, as well as ongoing teacher evaluations
to assess their instructional methods and effectiveness.
Utilizing technology can also enhance monitoring and evaluation. For instance, implementing a student
information system that tracks attendance, academic records, and behavior can provide valuable data
for analysis. This information can then be used to identify students who may require additional support
and address potential issues before they escalate.
Furthermore, regular communication and collaboration between school stakeholders, including teachers,
parents, and administrators, can greatly contribute to effective monitoring and evaluation. Establishing a
culture of openness and feedback allows for a holistic understanding of student performance and
instructional effectiveness. This can be achieved through regular meetings, surveys, and feedback
mechanisms that encourage honest and constructive dialogue.
In summary, effective and efficient school monitoring and evaluation involve the implementation of a
comprehensive assessment framework, the establishment of clear performance indicators and goals, the
utilization of technology, and fostering open communication and collaboration among stakeholders.
QUARTER
YEAR LEVEL SUBJECT 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH AVERAGE
FILIPINO 65.42 68.11 77.46 73.28 71.07
ENGLISH 50.63 60.21 69.73 63.19 60.94
MATH 59.01 57.25 65.38 70.33 62.99
SCIENCE 60.33 64.32 62.79 66.52 63.49
A.P. 70.46 69.9 65.67 80.88 71.73
ESP 62.93 65.78 71.72 78.41 69.71
TLE 66.07 68.78 74.54 69.23 69.66
MAPEH 55.41 62.62 65.38 80.44 65.96
Music 59.06 58.88 65.24 78.34 65.38
Arts 51.45 52.12 68.15 76.28 62
P.E. 53.78 81.23 67.69 88.48 72.8
GRADE 10 Health 57.36 58.25 60.45 78.64 63.68
FILIPINO 66.3 69.97 81.54 80.76 74.64
ENGLISH 66.57 67.9 68.52 68.62 67.9
MATH 60.38 72.98 70.17 71.35 68.72
SCIENCE 62.6 66.95 75.82 75.6 70.24
A.P. 67.6 69.62 70.98 79.5 71.93
ESP 67.37 70.41 66.78 70.03 68.65
TLE 62.1 67.01 78.47 70.27 69.46
MAPEH 66.93 71.65 71.57 80.58 72.68
Music 66.81 70.75 70.9 78 71.62
Arts 67.59 70.48 70.66 77.89 71.66
P.E. 67.22 73.93 73.19 85.1 74.86
GRADE 9 Health 66.1 71.45 71.45 81.32 72.58
FILIPINO 65.59 69.68 71.96 70.7 69.48
ENGLISH 66.81 57.94 64.34 64.93 63.51
MATH 57.63 61.95 70.63 75.95 66.54
SCIENCE 60.27 67.89 71.53 71.89 67.9
A.P. 59.76 58.76 72.05 70.43 65.25
ESP 59.88 68.85 71.59 73.63 68.49
TLE 58.27 60.88 66.16 68.7 63.5
MAPEH 69.78 68.17 69.5 69.88 69.33
Music 69.3 66.82 67.1 67.67 67.72
Arts 68.56 65.42 65.73 63.21 65.73
P.E. 71.62 69.83 74.03 76.1 72.9
GRADE 8 Health 69.63 70.61 71.15 72.53 70.98
FILIPINO 70.89 70.83 74.83 76.7 73.31
ENGLISH 69.21 69.76 69.93 69.68 69.65
MATH 62.16 64.1 67.64 69.1 65.75
GRADE 7 SCIENCE 61.93 66.39 72.01 72.06 68.1
Analysis
Increasing the mean percentage score of each subject area can have a significant impact.
Firstly, it indicates a higher level of understanding and proficiency in the subject matter. When the
mean score increases, it implies that a greater proportion of learners in that specific subject area
have performed well. This can reflect improved teaching methods, enhanced study materials, or a
stronger grasp of the curriculum.
Secondly, a higher mean score suggests increased overall academic performance. When
students excel in multiple subject areas, it demonstrates their ability to apply critical thinking,
problem-solving, and analytical skills across different fields. This broader knowledge base can
lead to better educational and career opportunities.
Furthermore, an increased mean score in each subject area can have positive implications for the
school or educational institution. It reflects positively on the teachers, indicating their
effectiveness in imparting knowledge and helping students succeed. This can enhance the
institution's reputation and attract more talented students and faculty.
Lastly, an improved mean score can have a cascading effect on individual students. Higher
scores can boost students' confidence, motivation, and self-esteem, encouraging them to
continue striving for excellence. It can also foster a positive learning environment where students
support and challenge each other, leading to a more engaged and productive classroom setting.
In conclusion, increasing the mean percentage score of each subject area has multiple benefits,
including improved subject-specific understanding, enhanced overall academic performance,
positive implications for educational institutions, and personal growth for individual students.
BEST PRACTICES
GRADE 7
GRADE 8
GRADE 9 and 10
GRADE 11 and 12
9,890.00
1,080.00
62,855.00
67,380.00
15,000.00
9,395.00
69,890.00
65,922.00
21,779.00
44,985.00
124,800.00
1,040,975.00