EE407 Lec 15 16 1
EE407 Lec 15 16 1
Microwave Engineering
Lecture 15 to 16
Designing/Simulating/Testing
Microwave filters
Dr. Sheikh Sharif Iqbal
References: Text books
• Filters are two-port networks used to control the frequency response in an RF
or microwave system by allowing transmission at frequencies within the pass-
band of the filter, and attenuation within the stop-band of the filter.
• Common filter responses include low-pass, high-pass, band-pass, band-stop.
• Filters are indispensable components in wireless systems, used in receivers for
rejecting signals outside the operating band, attenuating undesired mixer
products, and for setting the IF bandwidth of the receiver. In transmitters,
filters are used to control the spurious responses of up-converting mixers, to
select the desired sidebands, and to limit the bandwidth of the radiated signal.
• Insertion loss method is a flexible & accurate way to design & analyze filters
having a specific type of frequency response. It is based on network synthesis
techniques & used in the design process of low-pass filter prototype with the
assumption that it is normalized in terms of impedance and cutoff frequency.
• Impedance and frequency scaling and transformations are then used to convert
the normalized design to the one having the desired frequency response, cutoff
frequency, and impedance level.
• Finally, Transmission line stubs (with dimensions computed using Richard's
transformation, impedance/admittance inverters, and the Kuroda identities)
OR Stepped-Impedance techniques are used to facilitate filter implementation
in terms of practical microwave components.
• Three types of practical filter responses are considered here:
• Binomial or Butterworth or Maximally flat response: can cater the need for
minimum insertion loss by providing flattest possible pass-band response.
• Equal-ripple or Chebyshev response: can satisfy a requirement for the
sharpest cutoff region.
• Linear Phase response: is important in multiplexing filters used in comm.
systems to avoid distortion at the cost of filters sharp-cutoff characteristics.
• Insertion loss or Power Loss Ratio (PLR): by definition PLR is given by;
(eq. 1) where,
Γ(ω) is the ref. coeff.
looking into the filter
Thus, the insertion loss (IL) is :
PLR of Maximally flat Butterworth low-pass filter: By definition, power
- N is the order of the filter,
-loss ratio is; (eq. 2)
- ωC is the cutoff frequency
Fig.1
Thus from eq.1, the PLR of this circuit is written as;
Since,
We have,
(eq. 3)
• If LP filter of eq.2 has two elements (N=2) and is normalized (ZS=1Ω &
ωC=1): (eq. 2a) (as at ω=ωC, IL=10log(1+k2) Î 3dB, Thus k=1)
Fig 2a:Circuit
begins with
shunt element
Fig 2b:Circuit
begins with
series element
Table 1: Element (‘L’ &‘C’) Values for Normalized (g0=1 & ωC=1)
Maximally Flat (buterworth) Low-Pass Filter Prototype :
N g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 g6 g7 g8 g9 g10
1 2.0000 1.000
2 1.4142 1.414 1.000
3 1.0000 2.000 1.000 1.000
4 0.7654 1.848 1.848 0.765 1.000
5 0.6180 1.618 2.000 1.618 0.618 1.000
6 0.5176 1.414 1.932 1.932 1.414 0.518 1.000
7 0.4450 1.24 7 1.802 2.000 1.802 1.247 0.445 1.000
8 0.3902 1.111 1.663 1.962 1.962 1.663 1.111 0.390 1.000
9 0.3473 ].000 1.532 1.879 2.000 1.880 1.532 1.000 0.347 1.000
10 0.3129 0.908 1.414 1.782 1.975 1.975 1.782 1.414 0.908 0.313
But if the filter circuit is not given and needed to be designed:
• Order ‘N’ of a filter is dictated by given insertion-loss (attenuation) at some
frequency and using figure below, values of ‘N’ can be determined (for N<10)
Figure 3
Example 1: A maximally-flat low-pass filter is to be designed with a
cut-off frequency of 2 GHz & a minimum attenuation of 15dB at 3GHz
(a) Find the number (‘N’) of required filter elements.
(b) Find the un-scaled values of the filter reactive elements.
Sol.: Given, f=3 GHz and fC=2 GHz. Thus, |ω/ωC|-1=0.5. From fig 3
we get, N ≥ 5 to achieve minimum attenuation of 15dB (see red line)
(b) From Table 1, the un-scaled values of the filter reactive elements are;
g1 = 0.6180; g2 = 1.618; g3 = 2.000; g4 = 1.618; g5 = 0.618;
This filter circuit with five reactive elements are similar to Fig 2(a) or (b)
Scaling Designed Low pass Filter Prototypes:
• Scaling convert normalized filters to filters with prescribed impedance & ωC
• Impedance scaling: is obtained by multiplying proto-type impedances by required
source resistance (R0). Thus, RS/ = R0, RL/ = RL·R0, L/ = L·R0, C/ = C/R0,
where RS, RL , L, C are normalized values and RS/ , RL/ , L/ , C/ are scaled values.
• Frequency scaling: convert cut-off frequency of prototype from unity to required
value of ωC. Thus, scaled element values become; Lk/ = Lk/ωC and Ck/ = Ck/ωC
• For both Impedance & Frequency scaling: Lk/ = (R0·Lk)/ωC & Ck/ = Ck/ (R0· ωC)
( k=1,2,3… ) …………. Eq. 4
Example 2: If the maximally-flat LP filter has an impedance of 50, then
(1) find the scaled value of the reactive elements. (2) Draw the circuit.
Sol.: For the type of filter shown in Fig 2a; eq.4 & example1 sol. gives,
C1/ =0.984 pF, L2/ =6.438 nH, C3/ =3.183 pF, L4/ =6.438 nH, C5/ =0.984 pF
Thus,
Fig 4
• Same technique is used to obtain elements for the type of filter in fig 2b
PLR of Equal-ripple Chebyshev low-pass filter: By definition, power-
-loss ratio is; (eq. 5) - TN(x) is Chebyshev
polynomial of order ‘N’
• For normalized filters, ωC=1; where, T1(x) = x,
Thus for 2 element filter in fig 1; T2(ω)=2ω2 -1 T2(x) = 2x2-1,
T3(x) = 4x3-3x,
Eq.5 Î (eq. 6) T4(x) = 8x4 -8x2+1,
• Again for equal-ripple filter, using eq.6 & eq.3 lets find ripple level (k2)
If (eq. 3) is,
for even ‘N’& at ω=0, eq.3 & 6 gives ripple level, k2=(1-R)2/(4R) (eq. 7)
• Using eq’s 3, 6 & 7, we can find the two elements of the filter in Fig.1.
• For large ‘N’, given element tables are used to design LPF prototypes:
N g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 g6 g7 g8 g9 g10
1 0.699 1.000
Table 2:
2 1.403 0.707 1.984
For equal-ripple LFP
3 1.596 1.097 1.596 1.000
with 0.5 dB Ripple &
4 1.670 1.193 2.366 0.842 1.984 g0=1 & ωC=1
5 1.706 1.230 2.541 1.230 1.706 1.000
6 1.725 1.248 2.606 1.314 2.476 0.870 1.984
7 1.737 1.258 2.638 1.344 2.638 1.258 1.737 1.000
8 1.745 1.265 2.656 1.359 2.696 1.339 2.509 0.880 1.984
9 1.751 1.269 2.668 1.367 2. 724 1.367 2.668 1.269 1.750 1.000
10 1.754 1.272 2.675 1.373 2. 739 1.381 2.723 1.349 2.524 0.884
Table 3: Element (‘L’ &‘C’) Values for Normalized (g0=1 & ωC=1)
equal-ripple Low-Pass Filter Prototype (with 3.0 dB ripple)
N g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 g6 g7 g8 g9 g10
1 1.995 1.000
2 3.101 0.534 5.810
3 3.349 0.712 3.349 1.000
4 3.439 0.748 4.347 0.592 5.810
5 3.482 0.762 4.538 0.762 3.482 1.000
6 3.504 o. 769 4.606 0.793 4.464 0.603 5.810
7 3.518 0.772 4.639 0.84 4.639 0.772 3.518 1.000
8 3.528 0.77 5 4.658 0.809 4.699 0.802 4.499 0.607 5.809
9 3.534 0.776 4.669 0.812 4. 727 0.812 4.669 0.776 3.534 1.000
10 3.538 0.777 4.677 0.814 4.743 0.816 4.726 0.805 4.514 0.609
• Again for equal-ripple filter; the order ‘N’, dictated by given insertion-loss
(attenuation) at some frequency, is found using next two figures (for N<10)
For designing equal-ripple LP Filter Prototype (with 0.5 dB ripple):
Figure 5
For designing equal-ripple LP Filter Prototype (with 3.0 dB ripple):
Figure 6
PLR of Linear Phase low-pass filter prototype: The phase response is:
and
• Using same technique, elements values for linear phase LPF is obtained
• For large ‘N’, given element tables are used to design LPF prototypes:
N g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 g6 g7 g8 g9 g10
1 2.000 1.000
Table 4:
2 1.577 0.422 1.000
3 1.255 0.552 0.192 1.000
For linear phase LFP
4 1.059 0.511 0.318 0.110 1.000 with g0=1 & ωC=1
5 0.930 0.457 0.331 0.209 0.071 1.000
6 0.837 0.411 0.315 0.236 0.148 0.050 1.000
7 O. 767 0.374 0.294 0.237 0.177 0.110 0.037 1.000
8 0.712 0.344 0.273 0.229 0.186 0.138 0.085 0.028 1.000
9 0.667 0.320 0.254 0.218 0.185 0.150 0.111 0.068 0.023 1.000
10 0.630 0.300 0.238 0.206 0.180 0.153 0.124 0.091 0.055 0.018
Comparison of the three responses in terms of attenuation :
Comparison of the three responses in terms of phase:
MW/RF filter implementation using Stepped-Impedance LPF’s:
(1) (2) (3) (4)
where,
• Again for equivalent circuit of the TL, [ABCD] or [T] matrix is given by
jX jX
As where,
before:
• For TL with (l<λ/4 or θ<π/2) and (Z0<<1); B Α+’ and X Αsmall’
and the transmission line approximates a shunt capacitive impedance
Thus, B = ωC = Y0 sin(θ) = Y0 sin(βl) ≅ Y0 βl and X ≅ 0 ;
• Using scaling equation (for impedance & frequency) to un-scale gives:
ωC=ω{CN/(ωCR0)} ≅ (βl)/Z0 , where Z0=Z0l or impedance of thick TL section
So at ω=ωC, βl = (CNZ0h)/R0 , where R0 is equivalent to filter impedance
Then,
Using
rule
Richard’s rule
Step3.
Using Kuroda's Identities:
the series inductive stub in the diagram here
can be replaced by a shunt capacitive stub
on the other end of the λ/8 line, with
different values of characteristic impedance
Kuroda's Identities
k = 1+Z1/Z2
Step4.
Add lum/8 lines of Zo = 1 at input and
output
Step5.
Transform design to 50Ω and fc to obtain
physical dimensions
Step6.
Rules of width
Final Design
Filter Transformation
(Summery of a Student Project)
– i.e. g1,g2,g3,…,gn
ω
• Second step: Impedance and frequency ω ←scaling
ωc
• Frequency ω Scaling for low pass jB
filter: ω
jX k = j ( ) Lk = jωL' = j ( )Ck = jωCk '
ω
k
ωc
c
Ck
Lk where Ck ' =
Where Lk ' = ωc
ωC
Filter Transformation
Impedance Scaling: Multiply each inductor and resistor by Ro
and divide each capacitor by Ro
R0 L
L' =
ωC
C
C' =
R0ωC
Rs ' = R0
RL ' = R0 R
Filter Transformation
• Frequency Scaling: ⎛ ωc ⎞
ω ← ⎜− ⎟
⎝ ω⎠
− ωc 1 − ωC 1
jX k = j ( ) Lk = jBk = j ( )Ck =
ω jω C k ' ω jωLk '
1 1
Where C '= where Lk '=
k
ωC Lk ωc Ck
Filter Transformation
ω2 − ω1 ω0 = ω2ω 1
Where ∆=
ω0
Filter Transformation
j ⎡ ω ω0 ⎤ 1
jX k = ⎢ − ⎥ Lk = jωLk '+
• By substitution: ∆ ⎣ ω0 ω ⎦ jωC k '
Lk ∆
where Lk ' = And Ck ' =
∆ω0 ω0 Lk
j ⎡ ω ω0 ⎤ 1
jBk = ⎢ − ⎥Ck = jωCk '+
∆ ⎣ ω0 ω ⎦ jωLk '
∆ Ck
where Lk ' = And Ck ' =
ω0Ck ω0 ∆
Filter Transformation
• Impedance Scaling:
• Filter Transformations:
ω2 − ω1
Where ∆= ω0 = ω2ω 1
ω0
Filter Transformation
Why?
⎛ ωc ⎞ High Pass Filter
ω ← ⎜− ⎟
⎝ ω ⎠
ω0 ⎡ ω ω0 ⎤
ω← ⎢ − ⎥
Band Pass Filter
ω2 − ω1 ⎣ ω0 ω ⎦
−1
ω2 − ω1 ⎡ ω ω0 ⎤
ω← ⎢ − ⎥ Band Stop Filter
ω0 ⎣ ω0 ω ⎦
Simulating MW/RF filters
designed by Stepped-impedance method
using
‘High Frequency Structural
Simulator’ (HFSS-5.6)
Discussed Topics
• Introduce the Software HFSS
• Key features of HFSS
• Basic Steps for using HFSS
• Consider simulating the designed stepped
impedance low pass filter.
Introduction to HFSS
• Typically HFSS is used for modeling electromagnetic
fields in passive 3D structures
• Originally developed by HP. Currently purchased by
Ansoft from Agilent Technologies.
• Can work in UNIX or Windows Operating systems
• Can cater for Isotropic/Anisotropic Materials
(ANSOFTÎ can simulate Tensor or ferrite material )
• HFSS is a finite element (FEM) based software
• Trade off exist between mesh size of the FEM solution
and the desired accuracy in the results
Key Features of HFSS
• Uses FEM technique to solve Maxwell's Equations
and can and can include dispersion.
• Can simulate unrestricted geometries that contains
unlimited dielectrics and ports (Symmetries, Z-mul)
• Contains a model parts library of standard
microwave devices (filters, bends, circulators etc)
that can be used to model complex devices.
• Can calculate scattering parameter response for
multiple modes
• Can solve for electric-field distribution, including
far-field antenna radiation patterns.
Key Features of HFSS (cont.)
• Can calculate impedance and complex propagation
constants at each port for an unlimited number of
modes (Given Impedance/Calibration/Polarization
lines, as required)
• Can display vector and contour plots
• Quantitative versus distance graphs for field solutions
• Smith Chart plots
• Shaded and Animated field plots
• Data table
Basic Steps for using HFSS
• Modeling the Structure:
- Drawing the Geometry
- Defining the Material
- Defining and Calibrate the Ports
- Defining the Surface or Boundaries
• Analyzing the EM behavior
- Solving for S-parameters
- Analyzing the results using the post-processor
Fabricating MW/RF filters
designed by Stepped-impedance method
using
Printed Circuit Board plotter:
‘Protomat C60’
LPKF’s Protomate C60 Machine.