Scribd
Upload
81 views

Rule 110 Cases

The document outlines the rules regarding the institution of criminal actions in the Philippines. It discusses topics such as prescription periods in criminal actions, presentation of criminal cases, requirements for complaints or informations, issues of duplicity of offenses, amendments to complaints or informations, proper venue, and the right of offended parties to intervene. It cites numerous Supreme Court cases as examples for each topic.

Uploaded by

PCpl Jessie Mar Lazaga
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
81 views

Rule 110 Cases

The document outlines the rules regarding the institution of criminal actions in the Philippines. It discusses topics such as prescription periods in criminal actions, presentation of criminal cases, requirements for complaints or informations, issues of duplicity of offenses, amendments to complaints or informations, proper venue, and the right of offended parties to intervene. It cites numerous Supreme Court cases as examples for each topic.

Uploaded by

PCpl Jessie Mar Lazaga
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Rule 110

1. Institution of Criminal Actions


a. BPI vs. Hontanosas, Jr. GR No. 157163 25 June 2014
b. Heirs of Delgado vs. Gonzales, GR No. 157337, Aug 7, 2009
c. Lim vs. Mejica AC No. 11121, 13 Sept. 2016
2. Prescription in Criminal Action
a. Zaldivia vs. Reyes, Jr. 211 SCRA 277
b. People vs. Pangilinan, 672 SCRA 105
c. Arambulo vs. Laqui, Sr. 342 SCRA 740
3. Presentation of Criminal Actions
a. Worldwide Web Corp vs. People GR Nos. 161106 & 161266, 13 January 2013
b. Busuego vs. Office of Ombudsman, GR No. 196842, 09 Oct 2013
c. La Jimenez vs. Sorsogon, GR No. 178607, 05 Dec 2012
d. Chua vs. Padillo 522 SCRA 60
e. Pinote vs. Ayco 477 SCRA 409
f. Pilapil vs. Ibay-Somera 174 SCRA 653
g. People vs. Piccio GR No. 193681, 06 August 2014
4. Complaint or Information
1. Definition
a. Ampatuan Jr. vs. De Lima GR No. 197291, 03 April 2013
b. Oporto Jr. vs. Monserate AM No. MTJ-96-1109, 16 April 2001
c. Salazar vs. People, GR No. 149472, 15 October 2002
d. People vs. Arrojado, GR 207041, 09 November 2015

2. Sufficiency
People vs. Sandiganbayan, GR No. 160619, 09 September 2015
Zapata vs. People, GR No. 170863, 20 March 2013

a. Name of the accused


-People vs. Bali-Balita, GR No. 134266, 15 September 2000
b. Designation of offense
- People vs. Valdez, GR No. 175602, 18 January 2012
- People vs. Asilan, GR No. 188322, 11 April 2012
- People vs. Bayabos, GR Nos. 171222 and 174756, 18 February 2015
c. Cause of Accusation
- People vs. Sandiganbayan, Supra
- Dungo vs. People, GR No. 209464, 01 July 2015
d. Place of Commission of the offense
- Navaja vs. De Castro, GR No. 182926, 22 June 2015
e. Name of the offended party
- Lee Pue Liong vs. Chua Pue Chin Lee, GR No. 181658, 07 August 2013
- Senador vs. People, GR No. 201620, 06 March 2013

3. Duplicity of Offense
a. People vs. Jugueta, GR No. 202124, 05 April 2016
b. Loney vs. People, GR No. 152644, 10 February 2006
c. People vs. Court of Appeals, GR No. 183652, 25 February 2015

4. Amendment or Substitution
a. Balindong vs. CA, GR Nos. 177600 and 178684, 19 October 2015
b. Mendez vs. People, GR No. 179962, 11 June 2014
c. Ocampo vs. Abando, GR Nos. 176830, 185587, etc., 11 February 2014
d. Kummer vs. People, GR No. 174461, 11 September 2013

5. Venue
a. Unionbank vs. People, GR No. 192565, 28 February 2012
b. Navaja vs. de Castro, GR No. 182926, 22 June 2015
c. Sto. Tomas vs. Salac, 685 SCRA 245
d. Yalong vs. People, 704 SCRA 195

6. Intervention of Offended Party


a. Villalon vs. Chan, GR No. 196508, 24 September 2014

OTHER CASES:
1. People vs. Feliciano GR No. 196735, 05 May 2014
2. People vs. Begino, 582 SCRA 189
3. People vs. Lucena, GR No. 190632, 26 February 2014
4. People vs. Tuando, 785 SCRA 103

You might also like