Implementation of School Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan: Basis of Action Plan
Implementation of School Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan: Basis of Action Plan
Implementation of School Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan: Basis of Action Plan
Murphy P. Espinosa*
For affiliations and correspondence, see the last page.
Abstract
The research study assessed the implementation of the School Learning Recovery and Continuity
Plan (SLRCP) in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools of Zone 1, Division of Zambales for the
school year 2023-2024. The study used a descriptive survey research design and employed
descriptive and inferential statistics for data analysis. The findings revealed characteristics of school
heads involved in the implementation and highlighted areas of significant difference in the SLRCP
implementation based on educational attainment. However, no significant difference was found in
terms of age, sex, position, and years in service as school head concerning the implementation. The
proposed action plan is based on the study's lowest mean findings. Recommendations include
encouraging teachers to conduct learning needs assessments and seeking assistance from the Local
Government Unit for learners in need of electronic devices. Regular class observations are advised to
assess teaching methodologies, and training for community stakeholders and parents is encouraged to
improve communication and partnering skills. The action plan can be presented to School Heads for
potential implementation, and future researchers may conduct similar studies to validate the results.
DepEd will also intensify reading interventions, 3. Is there a significant difference in the profile of the
conduct regular home visits and follow-ups, respondents on the implementation of School Learning
implement physical and virtual study groups or buddy Recovery and Continuity Plan (SLRCP)?
systems, establish literacy at home and in the 4. What action plan may be proposed with the findings
community, hire parents or guardians teacher- of the study?
volunteers, and develop appropriate assessment tasks
and resources (Torio, 2022). The agency is also
studying physical and online learning action cell Methodology
sessions, adaptive teaching strategies and classroom
assessments, and the transition from the traditional
Research Design
approach to tailored acceleration for teachers
’professional development. (Torio, 2022).
This research study employed a descriptive research
As part of the post pandemic efforts, a learning method with the survey questionnaire as the main
recovery plan (LRP) needs to be in place to guide research instrument. According to McCombes (2019),
schools and ensure that interventions are effective Descriptive research aims to accurately and
thereby helping learners catch up and accelerate their systematically describe a population, situation or
learning (Schools Division of Zambales Memorandum phenomenon. It can answer what, where, when and
No. 138, 2022). To address the learning gaps caused how questions, but not why questions.
by CoViD-19 pandemic, school heads in the Division
Siraj & Ibrahim of Zambales were crafted their School For Calderon (2006) as cited by English Language
Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan (SLRCP). As Education Journals (2018), defined descriptive
stated in Regional Memorandum No. 395 s. 2022, the research as a purposive process of gathering,
School Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan analyzing, classifying, and tabulating data about
(SLRCP) is only an enhance version of School prevailing conditions, practices, processes, trends, and
Learning Recovery Plan. The researcher was intended cause-effect relationships and then making adequate
to assess the implementation of School Learning and accurate interpretation about such data with or
Recovery and Continuity Plan (SLRCP) as a basis of without or sometimes minimal aid of statistical
action plan to address learning disruption and support methods. Also, this method ascertains prevailing
student resilience and mental well-being. conditions of facts in a group under study that gives
either qualitative or quantitative, or both, descriptions
Research Questions of the general characteristics of the group as results.
The research study assessed the implementation of It was stated in the article of Bhattacharya & Chetty
School Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan (2020), that according to Apuke (2017), quantitative
(SLRCP) in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools research refers to data present in numeric form. When
of Zone 1, Division of Zambales that will serve as collected using a primary method, it uses statistical
basis of an action plan for the school year data collected by means of a questionnaire. The
2022-2023. Specifically, the research answered the purpose of quantitative research is to emphasize the
following research questions: collection of objective data in order to assess a social
phenomenon (Bhattacharya, 2020).
1. What is the profile of the School Head in terms:
1.1. Age; Respondents and Location
1.2. Sex;
1.3. Highest Educational Attainment; The respondents of the research study were the School
1.4. Position; and Heads/Administrators from Elementary, National High
1.5. Years in Service? Schools, and Integrated Schools at Zone 1, Division of
2. How may the implementation of the School Zambales. Table 1 below shows the frequency
Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan (SLRCP) may distribution of the respondents by school. A total
be described in terms of: po pulation of seventy seven (77) School
2.1. K-12 Curriculum Review and Update; Heads/Administrators were the respondents of the
2.2. Improving Learning Environment; research study.
2.3. Teachers’ Upskilling and Reskilling; and
2.4. Engagement of Stakeholders for Support and
Collaboration?
Data Collection
The main instrument used in gathering the data for the
study was survey checklist. According to Pressbooks
After making the final draft of the survey checklist, the
(2022), survey research is a research method involving
researcher sought permission/approval of the Schools
the use of standardized questionnaires or interviews to
collect data about people and their preferences,
Division Superintendent, Division of Zambales,
thoughts, and behaviors in a systematic manner. The through letters signed by the Director of Graduate
survey method can be used for descriptive, School to administer the survey questionnaire to the
exploratory, or explanatory research. This method is respondents.
best suited for studies that have individual people as
the unit of analysis. After securing the endorsement, the researcher
personally distributed the instrument to the
The contents of the survey checklist were lifted from participants. In addition, the researcher also utilized
the provisions of DepEd Order No. 12, Series of 2020 Google Form for the administration of survey
- Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity questionnaire. The objectives of the study were
Plan for School Year-2021 In Light of the Covid-19 explained to the participants, for them to consider and
Public Health Emergency, Zambales Schools Division gain better understanding of the objectives of the
Office Memorandum No. 172, Series of 2022 - research study. The respondents’ answers treated
Development of School Learning Recovery Plan
confidential. The instruments collected immediately.
(SLRP) and 3BS Bata Basa Bilang Suri – A Learning
Recovery and Continuity Plan for Zambaleño
Data Analysis
Learners.
Initial part of the survey checklist focused on the The statistical treatment of this research study utilized
profile of the school head –respondents which include descriptive statistical tools such as percentage,
the age, sex, highest educational attainment, position frequency counts and mean. The inferential statistics
and number of years in service. used was ANOVA. All the data obtained in the
instrument were tallied, tabulated, analyzed and
The last part assessed the implementation of school interpreted accordingly. The following are the
learning recovery and continuity plan of school heads. explanations of the utility and/or uses of the above
This part has 4 sections which were K-12 Curriculum mentioned statistical tools.
Review and Upd ate, I mprov ing Learn ing
Environment, Teachers’ Upskilling and Reskilling and
Frequency Count – This is a simple count of the
Engagement of Stakeholders for Support and
tallies for each indicator of the variables in the
Collaboration with 10 indicators. The school heads
answered from the scale ranging from 4 (Always statement of the problems number 1 and 2.
Implemented), 3 (Implemented), 2 (Sometimes Percentage – It is the ratio of any number to the
Implemented) and 1 (Never Implemented). whole. It will be used to determine the proportions of
the respondents that fall under the personal or
The instrument in its first draft was presented to the demographic profile variables.
Weighted Mean – This will be computed in order to
determine the overall perceptions of the respondents.
The test of significant difference in the implementation There was no significant difference in the
of the School Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan implementation of the School Learning Recovery and
in terms of K- 12 Curriculum Review and Update Continuity Plan in terms of K- 12 Curriculum Review
when grouped according to profile variables is and Update on the computed P-values of age (Sig.=
presented in Table 8. 0.43), sex (Sig.= 0.96), position (Sig.= 0.17), and
years in service as school head (Sig.= 0.41) which are
There was a sig n if icant d if fer ence in the
greater than (>) 0.05 Alpha Level of Significance,
implementation of the School Learning Recovery and
Continuity Plan in terms of K- 12 Curriculum Review therefore the Null Hypothesis is Accepted, hence there
and Update on the computed P-value of highest is no significant difference when grouped according to
educational attainment (Sig.= 0.01) which is less than profile variables in terms of sex, age, position and
or equal to (≤) 0.05 Alpha Level of Significance, years in service as school head. The school heads’
therefore the Null Hypothesis is Rejected, hence there
is a significant difference when grouped according to
profile variables in terms of highest educational
attainment.
perception on the K- 12 Curriculum Review and position and years in service as school head. The
Update has no statistically significant on the profile of results suggest that the profile of the school heads has
the respondents. According to Go (2021), the nothing to do with the improving of learning
Department of Education (DepEd) recently announced environment, what matters is that the school heads are
its plan to review the present K-to-12 curriculum able to perform duties and responsibilities on school
because of the obvious congestion in the learning management. Besides, school leaders must determine
competencies. According to reports, the 2022 version the school’s progression and promote a positive
of the new curriculum will be released by the end of learning environment to foster and strengthen the
2021 and applied next year. The review is being motivation and commitment of teachers to enable
undertaken to relieve students of overwhelming change in stressful conditions (Noureen, Shah, &
requirements in all their subjects. Zamir, 2017). Principals play a key role in creating
effective learning environments through their
Improving Learning Environment influence on factors such as teachers' development and
cooperation, motivations and working conditions and
The test of significant difference on implementation of the general school climate and environment (OECD,
the School Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan in 2013).
terms of Improving Learning Environment when
grouped according to profile variables is presented in Teachers’ Upskilling and Reskilling
Table 9.
The test of significant difference on implementation of
Table 9. Test of Significant Difference on the School Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan in
Implementation of the School Learning Recovery and terms of Teachers’ Upskilling and Reskilling when
Continuity Plan in terms of Improving Learning grouped according to profile variables is presented in
Environment When Grouped According to Profile Table 10.
Variables
There was a sig n ificant d ifference in the
implementation of the School Learning Recovery and
Continuity Plan in terms of Teachers’ Upskilling and
Reskilling on the computed P-value of highest
educational attainment (Sig.= 0.048) which is less than
or equal to (≤) 0.05 Alpha Level of Significance,
therefore the Null Hypothesis is Rejected, hence there
is a significant difference when grouped according to
profile variables in terms of highest educational
attainment. The result denoted that the school heads’
educational attainment perceived important also on the
enhancing the teaching competencies of the teachers. It
is important that the teachers are abreast with the
current trends in pedagogy. Pihie, Sadeghi, and Elias
(2012) assertion that to be successful, school leaders
should learn as much as possible of leadership
There was no significant difference in the effectiveness by engaging in professional development
implementation of the School Learning Recovery and to regularly demonstrate their transformational
Continuity Plan in terms of Improving Learning leadership to handle organizational change. Sustained
Environment on the computed P-values on the advanced knowledge is a key aspect of helping
computed P-values of age (Sig.= 0.19), sex (Sig.= teachers to respond to changing expectations and to
0.45), highest educational attainment (Sig.= 0.16), develop their professional skills (Ross, Vescio,
position (Sig.= 0.58), and years in service as school Tricarico, & Shor, 2011). Successful leadership
head (Sig.= 0.07) which are all greater than (>) 0.05 requires both explicit and implicit methods to boost
Alpha Level of Significance, therefore the Null the work environment (Kusumadewi, Sudja, & Sujana,
Hypothesis is Accepted, hence there is no significant 2018).
difference when grouped according to profile variables
in terms of age, sex, highest educational attainment,
The test of significant difference on implementation of There was no significant difference in the
the School Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan in implementation of the School Learning Recovery and
terms of Engagement of Stakeholders for Support and Continuity Plan in terms of Engagement of
Collaboration when grouped according to profile Stakeholders for Support and Collaboration on the
computed P-values of age (Sig.= 0.15), and sex (Sig.=
variables is presented in Table 11.
0.63), which are greater than (>) 0.05 Alpha Level of
Significance, therefore the Null Hypothesis is
Accepted, hence there is no significant difference
when grouped according to profile variables in terms
of age and sex. The results suggest that the profile of learning environment, while actively involving
the school has statistically significant effect to the stakeholders for support and collaboration. (3) To
engagement of stakeholders for support and improve the School Learning Recovery and Continuity
collaboration. According to Reading (2018), Plan, attention should be given to tailoring the
school leaders must encourage collaboration implementation of the K-12 Curriculum Review and
with stakeholders who understand the mission of the Update based on the highest educational attainment of
school, who share vision and passion for student school heads, while no significant differences were
success, and most importantly who have a personal found in terms of Improving Learning Environment
stake in the performance of the school and its when considering age, sex, highest educational
students. attainment, position, and years in service as school
head. (4) For effective action planning, it is
recommended to prioritize areas identified with the
Conclusion lowest mean scores in the study, aiming to address and
improve those aspects of the School Learning
Based on the summary of findings, the researcher Recovery and Continuity Plan.
concluded that: (1)The school heads are young adult,
females, Master’s degree holder, Principal II, and with References
more than 5 years in service as school head. (2) The
school heads always implemented the K-12 curriculum Adlit, M. F., & Adlit, M. F. (2022). Frameworks of School Learning
review, update, teachers’ upskilling and reskilling and Continuity Plan in the New Normal towards Diversity and
improving learning environment while engagement of Inclusiveness. Puissant, 3, 442-464. Retrived from
https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/78593
stakeholders for support and collaboration evaluated
often implemented on the implementation of the Alomes, B. (2020). The Importance Of Stakeholders When It Comes
School Learning Recovery and Continuity. (3) There To Creating Successful Learning Outcomes. Natural Pod. Retrieved
was a significant difference in the implementation of from
the School Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan in https://naturalpod.com/the-importance-of-stakeholders-when-it-com
es-to- creating-successful-learning-outcomes/
terms of K- 12 Curriculum Review and Update when
grouped according to highest educational attainment. An, Y., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Yang, J. et al. 2613 (2021).
There was no significant difference in the Examining K-12 teachers’ feelings, experiences, and perspectives
regarding online teaching during the early stage of the
implementation of the School Learning Recovery and
COVID-19 pandemic. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 2589–.
Continuity Plan in terms of Improving Learning https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10008-5. Retrieved from
Environment when grouped according to age, sex, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-021 10008-5
highest educational attainment, position, and years in
Aquino, C. J. C., Febelico, F. & Afalia, B. (2021). anaging
service as school head.There was a significant educational institutions: School heads' leadership practices and
difference in the implementation of the School teachers' performance. International Journal of Evaluation
Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan in terms of and Research in Education (IJERE). 10(4):1325 1333
Teachers’ Upskilling and Reskilling when grouped DOI:10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21518
according to highest educational attainment.There was Bakhshialiabad, H., Bakhshi, G., Hashemi, Z. et al. Improving
a significant difference in the implementation of the students’ learning environment by DREEM: an educational
School Learning Recovery and Continuity Plan in experiment in an Iranian medical sciences university
terms of Engagement of Stakeholders for Support and ( 2 0 1 1 – 2 0 1 6 ) . BMC M ed E d u c 19, 397 ( 2 0 1 9 ) .
h t t p s : / / d o i . o rg / 1 0 . 1 1 8 6 / s 1 2 909 -0 1 9 -1 8 3 9 -9
Collaboration when grouped according to highest
educational attainment.(4) The proposed action plan Balan, S., Katenga, J. E., & Simon, A. (2019). Reading habits and
was developed based on lowest mean as the findings their influence on academic achievement among
students at Asia Pacific International University. In
of the study.
Abstract Proceedings International Scholars
Conference (Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1490- 1516).
Based on the findings of the study, the researcher has https://doi.org/10.35974/isc.v7i1.928
formulated the following recommendations. (1) The
school heads are encouraged to develop their Barrot, J. (2021). K to 12 curriculum reform in the Philippines:
towards making students future ready Retrieved from
educational attainment to contribute more in the https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02188791.(2021).197
attainment of school vision, motivation, performance 3959
management, decision-making, negotiation and
Beloy, R. G. (2021). Because Every Learner Matters A Journey on
interpersonal skills. (2) The school heads are
Saving One Learner at a Time Through
encouraged to focus on consistent and frequent Intervention Projects
execution of K-12 curriculum review, update, teachers'
upskilling and reskilling, and improvement of the Bernstein, R. S., Bulger, M., Salipante, P., & Weisinger, J. Y.
(2020). From diversity to inclusion to equity: A theory of
Iňiguez, L. (2022).Workplace: A Breakdown. Noureen, M., Shah, H., & Zamir, S.(2017). Effect of Leadership
https://www.hirebook.com/blog/promotion-at-the-workplace. Styles of Secondary School Heads on
School Improvement.Global Social Sciences
Jenkins R. (2021). UNICEF. Stated at Learning losses from
Review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 519-527, 2020, doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-
COVID-19 could cost this generation of students close to $17 I).53
t r i ll io n in l i fe ti me e a rn in g s . R e t rie v ed from
https://www.unicef.org/turkiye/en/press-releases/learning OECD: (2013).Leadership for 21st Century Learning, Educational
losses-covid-19-could-cost-generation-students-close-17-trillion- Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved
lifetime f r o m
https://gpseducation.oecd.org/revieweducationpolicies/#!node=4173
Kampen, M. (2019). 5 Ways To Make Teacher Professional 5&filter=all
Development Effective. Prodigy Education. Retrieved from
https://www.prodigygame.com/main en/blog/teacher-professional- Official Gazette. (2016). WHAT IS K TO 12 PROGRAM? ICT
Posner, B. Z. (2016) Investigating the reliability and validity of the Steinberg, M. P., & Yang, H. (2020). Does principal professional
Leadership Practices Inventory®,” Administrative development improve principal persistence, teacher
Sciences, vol. 6 , n o . 4, p p . 1 - 2 3 , d o i : effectiveness, and student achievement?
1 0 .33 90 / ad m s ci 60 400 17 . Evidence from Pennsylvania’s Inspired Leadership Induction
Program(EdWorkingPaper 20-190). Annenberg Institute at
Postholm, M.B. (2012). Teachers’ professional development: A B r o w n
theoretical review. Educ. Res. 54, 405–429. University.https://edworkingpapers.org/sites/default/files/ai20-190.p
df
Queens University of Charlotte. (2022). The Importance of
Professional Development for Educators. Retrieved Sutcher, L., Podolsky, A., & Espinoza, D. (2017). Supporting
from: principals’ learning: Key features of effective programs.
https://online.queens.edu/resources/article/professional-development Learning Policy Institute.
-for educators/ https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-
Rillo, R., Alieto, E. (2018). Indirectness Markers in Korean and The Glossary of Education Reform. Learning Loss. (2013).
Persian English Essays: Implications for Teaching Writing to Retrieved from https://www.edglossary.org/learning-loss/
EFL Learners. English Language Education Journals. Retrieved The Wing Institute of Morningside Academy. (2022). Teacher
from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED596726.pdf Competencies. Retrieved from
https://www.winginstitute.org/quality-teachers competencies
Ross, D. D., Vescio, V., Tricarico, K. and Short, K. (2011). Secrets
for mentoring novice teachers. Gainesville, FL: Torio A. (2022). Department of Education. DepEd develops learning
Lastinger Center for Learning.
recovery plan as more schools conduct face-to-face classes.
Retrieved f r o m :
Sabine, M., Julian, F., & Rolf, S. (2022). The impact of the
https://www.deped.gov.ph/2022/03/29/deped-develops-learning-reco
COVID-19 pandemic on education: international evidence from
very plan-as-more-schools-conduct-face-to-face-classes/
the Responses to Educational Disruption Survey (REDS). UNESCO
D i g i t a l L i b r a r y . R e t r i e v e d f r o m Torres, P. D. (2021). Active engagement of stakeholders during the
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380398 pandemic: Basis for creating flexible learning environment for
students. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research
Schools Division of Zambales Memorandum No. 138. (2022).
Technology, 6(2), 466-476.
Schools Division Face-to
Face Training Workshop on the UNICEF. (2022). Are Children Really Learning? Exploring
Development of Learning foundational skills in the midst of a learning crisis. Retrieved
R e c o v e r y from
Plan.https://drive.google.com/file/d/10ruQcjm_a06VFwjtZEstjkK12 https://data.unicef.org/resources/are-children-really-learning-foundat
E_ ional skills-report/