Jump Landing Program For Females Development Of.8
Jump Landing Program For Females Development Of.8
for Females:
Development of
a Systematic Progression
Model
Guy Mothersole, MSpEx,1 John B. Cronin, PhD,1,2 and Nigel K. Harris, PhD1
1
Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand;
and 2School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Science, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
M
SPORTING MOVEMENTS OFTEN
(21,24,40). The inability for female ath-
INVOLVE JUMP LANDINGS FROM basketball, and volleyball, are
letes to correctly attenuate high jump-
A VARIETY OF HEIGHTS AND DIS- typified by a variety of jump-
landing impact forces through muscle
TANCES. THESE JUMP LANDINGS landing tasks that are often critical to
contraction has been linked to incorrect
ARE ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH success and winning performance. Typ-
landing technique (12,43), insufficient
ically, high ground reaction forces
GROUND REACTION FORCES. muscular strength (18,21,35), a lack of
(GRFs) are generated by athletes in
ALTHOUGH ATHLETES MAY HAVE balance (25,41), and deficiencies in neu-
these sports given the dynamic and
THE CAPABILITY TO ABSORB romuscular control (20).
explosive nature of jump landings in
THESE JUMP-LANDING IMPACTS, training and competition (12,36,48). To physically condition the body
INCORRECT LANDING TECH- When jump-landing impact forces are to effectively attenuate impact force
NIQUE, INSUFFICIENT MUSCULAR expressed relative to body weight (BW), during competition, it is essential to
STRENGTH, AND A LACK OF BAL- they have been reported to be as high as systematically progress jump-landing
ANCE AND NEUROMUSCULAR 5.7–8.9 BW (12,36,44) during specific intensity throughout training. This
CONTROL PLACE THE LOWER sporting movements. As a result, ath- can be achieved by gradually increas-
EXTREMITIES UNDER RISK OF letes are exposed to high external and ing the stress imposed on the body in
INJURY. DESIGNING AND IMPLE- internal forces, which are considered an effort to develop a high jump-
potentially injurious for the lower landing impact tolerance. This system-
MENTING JUMP-LANDING TRAIN-
extremities (24,44,46). atic increase in stimulus is important
ING INTEGRATING CORRECT
for continual adaptation and a prereq-
LANDING PRINCIPLES AND SPE- GRFs produced during jumping and
uisite for injury prevention and athletic
CIFIC CONDITIONING OF THE landing are an accurate representation
improvement (30).
LOWER LIMB MAY HELP TO of impact intensity as there is an asso-
ciation between impact force and com-
REDUCE INJURY PREVALENCE
pressive strain on the bones and
AND IMPROVE PERFORMANCE. KEY WORDS:
surrounding musculature (51). If the adaptations to training; athletic
THIS ARTICLE FOCUSES ON
impact force surpasses the force pro- training; complex training; exercise
TARGETED STRATEGIES AND duced by the involved musculature,
SYSTEMATIC PROGRESSIONS selection; exercise technique; female;
then all exceeding GRFs will be injuries/injury prevention;
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF diverted by the bones and ligamentous neuromuscular adaptations;
JUMP-LANDING PROFICIENCY tissue, which amplifies the expected plyometrics; resistance training
FOR FEMALE ATHLETES. risk of ligament ruptures (21). This
52 VOLUME 36 | NUMBER 4 | AUGUST 2014 Copyright Ó National Strength and Conditioning Association
Given the previous information, the impact stress (23). With respect to foot initial ground contact) can mediate de-
need for an appropriately designed placement, a forefoot to heel ground creases in landing GRF by 213%.
jump-landing program integrating cor- contact pattern is advocated with the Consistent landing technique feedback
rect landing principles and progressive feet landing parallel as this helps to is critical during each phase of this
conditioning of the lower limb is diffuse impact forces more evenly proposed training model to ensure that
apparent. This article first presents throughout the feet (29). In the case fundamental movement patterns are
ideal fundamental jump-landing and of a single-leg landing, the foot should maintained during potentially unsafe
feedback mechanics before introduc- be positioned under the body’s center jump-landing sequences. Furthermore,
ing a systematic progression model of mass (COM). Adhering to these fun- it is suggested to cease all jump land-
for the development of jump-landing damental jump-landing mechanics ings if the desired technique dimin-
proficiency. The model incorporates may help to reduce both the rate and ishes to ensure that the incorrect
recommended design methods and magnitude of GRF during impact. behavior is not learned. A set of sug-
targeted training components for effec- Receiving feedback is an essential part gested jump-landing kinematics for
tive program implementation. of modifying movement patterns as it effective feedback delivery throughout
is a key component of acquiring new training can be observed in Figure 1. It
FUNDAMENTAL JUMP-LANDING motor programs (12). Herman et al. is also recommended that the strength
AND FEEDBACK MECHANICS (18) examined the use of strength train- and conditioning coach uses a camera
When implementing any type of jump- ing and feedback on lower body bio- or other electronic devices for video
landing training, it is imperative that mechanics during a jump task. They recording purposes to reinforce verbal
the strength and conditioning profes- concluded that with the exclusion of feedback to the athlete, as this will be
sional emphasizes proper technique proper instruction on technique, ath- invaluable and likely enable a more
(40). It is proposed by Myer et al. letes may not effectively integrate the rapid progression through the phases.
(40) that throughout an effective benefits of their increased strength into
jump-landing sequence, the chest is their movement patterns. The use of JUMP-LANDING PROGRESSION
encouraged to be over the knees with video feedback and expert feedback MODEL
shoulders and hips aligned. The verti- has been shown to significantly reduce The majority of studies investigating
cal jump should have minimal for- vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) interventions aimed at improving
ward/back or side-to-side movement, (225.8%) for all video feedback condi- jump-landing performance and injury
and the landing should display ade- tions (43). Researchers exploring the prevention use a variety of training
quate flexion of the hips, knees, and effects of verbal feedback on volleyball methods, for example, strength and
ankles (Figure 1) as this helps to atten- spike jump–landing technique reported plyometric training (6,14,23,39). It is
uate impact forces. In addition, the that a single session of augmented feed- therefore difficult to decipher the
knees should be positioned above the back significantly reduced VGRF by degree of influence certain programs
feet with no excessive adduction or 223% (12). Similar conclusions were have on the training outcomes. It
abduction as equal distribution of force drawn from McNair et al. (37) demon- would seem that a combination of
across both the medial and lateral com- strating that precise kinematic instruc- training strategies has the most advan-
partments of the knee may reduce the tion (feedback on knee flexion angle at tageous effect on landing mechanics,
Figure 1. Fundamental jump-landing technique instruction: (1) head upright, (2) chest above knees with feet shoulder width apart,
(3) shoulders and hips level, (4) descend to a self-selected depth with knees in line with toes, (5) jump vertically
with minimal forward/back and side-to-side movement, (6) land with a forefoot to heel foot placement and adequate
flexion of hips, knees, and ankles.
impact force dissipation, and physical performance but also prevent injury. by Kritz et al. (33) where athletes are
conditioning of the lower body. The For this to occur, the program must loaded according to their ability to
most promising training components systematically progress in intensity, so perform an exercise and as such ath-
seem to be teaching fundamental exer- that the body can appropriately adapt letes are progressed through assisted,
cise techniques and landing principles to the given training stimulus. The most BW, resisted, eccentric, and plyomet-
with the appropriate feedback; improv- influential barriers that impede the ric exercises.
ing balance and stability with specific advancement of jump-landing perfor- This model incorporates 4 phases,
focus surrounding the ankle and hip mance are injury and training plateaus; which increase in load intensity and
joint; increasing muscular strength, with however, the correct application of pro- movement complexity (Figure 2).
particular emphasis on the muscles of gressive overload can potentially reduce The 4 phases focus on specific out-
the posterior chain; and heightening the effects of these barriers (30). In this comes and include (a) technique and
neural drive and neuromuscular control regard, we propose a model that ad- general strength, (b) eccentric strength,
through plyometric-type exercises. dresses this progression and the integra- stability, and alignment, (c) stretch-
The ultimate goal of a jump-landing tion of various training methods. The shorten cycle (SSC) propulsive power
program is to not only improve model is a derivative of that proposed and landing, and (d) sport-specific
Figure 3. Squat progressions: left to right—assisted squat, body weight squat, resisted squat.
Figure 4. Hamstring exercises: top right—Russian hamstring drop (start position), top left—Russian hamstring drop (finish position);
bottom left—Romanian dead lift (start position), bottom right—Romanian dead lift (finish position).
single-leg squats, split squats, and lunges, mechanics are regularly demonstrated landing, which is the position they
will also challenge balance ability. (Figure 1). It is also advocated that all will be encouraged to replicate during
Plyometric training during phase 1 has landings are held for 3–5 seconds to eccentric landings in phase 2. These
been termed “long response” in that assist in the development of perfect types of jump landings can be pro-
the propulsion and landing are typified landing technique. gressed within this phase by increasing
by adequate hip, knee, and ankle flex- Box jump exercises are effective during the height of the box as this challenges
ion and also alignment upon impact. this phase as they develop basic jump- the force required to perform the
That is, the propulsive and landing landing ability in a controlled environ- jump. Increasing the height also in-
phases are deeper than other phases, ment. Jumping onto a box effectively creases the depth of the squat posi-
reducing particularly the landing forces develops jumping actions without the tion during landing as more hip
(i.e., soft landings), which become accentuated landing impact caused by flexion is required to get the feet onto
a greater focus in phase 2. Plyometric gravity through reducing the descent the higher box.
exercises should initially be performed to the ground. Jumping onto a box also Progression to phase 2 is recommended
bilaterally with a progression to single- allows the athlete to comfortably sim- once the athlete demonstrates adequate
leg landings once correct landing ulate a deep squat position during strength endurance during squatting
and lunging patterns at an appropriate muscles with an eccentric muscle con- Balance training drills in phase 2 should
load in addition to demonstrating satis- traction focus has been shown to pro- transition toward more dynamic stabi-
factory single-leg balance. It is also mote greater gains in overall strength lizing exercises, however, they should
important that perfect technique during and muscle hypertrophy because of still be performed in a stationary posi-
jump-landing tasks (Figure 1) is dis- the larger loads that the muscle can tion, and therefore have been labeled as
played as competent performance in this control in comparison with concentric “dynamically static.” With the focus
phase is critical to the development of training (47). Therefore, an increase in being stability and alignment, effective
jump-landing ability in the latter stages muscle mass is an adaptation that may balance drills should allow the athlete to
of this progressive model. occur throughout this phase. maneuver their COM while continuing
In terms of specific exercises, the to stabilize on their stance leg (Figure 7),
PHASE 2: ECCENTRIC STRENGTH, emphasis should continue to progress as this is consistent with successful land-
STABILITY, AND ALIGNMENT squatting ability in addition to exer- ing performance.
The emphasis of phase 2 is to develop cises that focus on single-leg strength Exercises such as swings as seen in
eccentric leg strength along with development (Figure 6). Incorporating Figure 8 challenge functional ankle sta-
enhancing balance, stability, and con- single-leg exercises will help to develop bility and strengthen the gluteal
trol of joint alignment. The landing the athlete’s ability to express strength muscles. Cueing the torso to be strong
component is the primary focus in an unstable environment and eccen- and tall is important given the reduced
throughout this phase with exercises trically loading the lower extremities in base of support, which increases the
and drills projected toward improving a safe manner. In the absence of spe- required stability to perform compe-
the body’s ability to land controlled cific eccentric machines, the strength
and aligned. tent movement. The swing exercise
and conditioning professional is
can progress to swinging movements
During jump landing, the most promi- encouraged to be creative in designing
while on toes as this effectively de-
nent forces are present when the or using eccentric overload exercises.
creases the base of support and creates
involved musculature is contracting Instances of this could be using “two
a higher COM, which challenges the
eccentrically (8). Therefore, the body up one down–type exercises” where
athletes push concentrically with 2 ability to stabilize to a greater extent.
must possess adequate levels of eccen-
tric strength to control the body’s limbs and eccentrically lower with For the plyometric training compo-
movements and accomplish safe one. In addition, the exercises dis- nent, a progression to accentuated
jump-landing form (18). Consequently, played in Figure 4 are also suitable as landings begins, thus termed “eccentric
the strength-training emphasis during they effectively stimulate the eccentric response.” It is recommended that
phase 2 should move toward develop- action of the muscles involved in jump- drop and stick exercises are initially
ing “eccentric strength.” Exercising landing performance. used in this phase. Drop and stick
Figure 6. Single-leg exercises: left and middle pictures—lateral crossover step down, the athlete starts the movement at the top of
the box and slowly lowers the opposite foot to the ground; right picture—eccentric bulgarian squat, the athlete starts
with the front leg in an extended position and then quickly drops to the bottom position and arrests the movement.
exercises are performed with the athlete Exercises in this phase can be further Advancing drop landings within this
starting in a standing position and then advanced by performing drop landings phase can be achieved by increasing
quickly dropping into an athletic squat off a box. Drop-landing exercises are box drop height and also jumping dis-
stance. A progression from this point is particularly important as they allow tance. Increasing the box height will allow
to drop into a lunge position and then the body to adapt to high impact athletes to experience greater impact
finally a single-leg squat position. forces in a controlled manner (44). forces because of the effect of gravity
Figure 7. Dynamically static exercises: left to right—medicine ball single-leg squat (start position), medicine ball single-leg squat
(finish position); single-leg stiff-legged dead lift (start position), single-leg stiff-legged dead lift (finish position).
and an associated increase in impact more degrees of freedom than the pre- prevalence (21), it is important that max-
velocity (38). In the same respect, larger vious drop-landing program in phase 2. imum neural strength is continually
jumping distances yield greater propulsive For example, because the landing is increased in an effort to attenuate the
forces upon takeoff (15), which effectively preceded by a jump, there is likely to increased impact forces experienced
increases both vertical and horizontal be greater horizontal and/or lateral during the advancement of exercises
COM velocities during landing. This in momentum to arrest or control when performed throughout this phase. In
turn increases the magnitude of the land- jumping for distance. addition, most sports necessitate athletes
ing forces. In addition, the proportion of The focus for the strength-training to possess certain amounts of strength
unilateral landings should increase to chal- component throughout phase 3 is endurance and power; therefore, maxi-
lenge the need to stabilize and balance. to increase “relative strength.” A typ- mal relative strength is an optimal qual-
Progression to phase 3 is recommen- ical adaptation of consistent high- ity to develop given the strong
ded once the athlete exhibits acceptable intensity strength training is the correlation between both strength
eccentric control during squatting at an growth and proliferation of myofibril endurance and muscular power.
appropriate load. Furthermore, athletes muscle filaments; however, increases As intimated previously, there is
must demonstrate an ability to maintain in strength can also be achieved by likely to be greater horizontal and/
balance during exercises that challenge increasing neural activation, which or lateral momentum to arrest or con-
dynamic stability in addition to per- limit changes in muscle size (16). trol during this phase because of the
forming correct landing mechanics dur- The objective is to develop neural inclusion of the propulsive jump
ing single-leg drop landings. This strength without increasing muscle phase; so, the strength training needs
would validate that the required physi- size to increase strength per kilogram to become multiplanar in focus. Exer-
cal ability is present to safely advance of body mass. It is recommended that cises that strengthen the musculature
the training phase. developing relative strength is in the vertical, horizontal, and lateral
achieved by increasing maximum planes are fundamental to this phase
strength while minimizing changes (Figure 9).
PHASE 3: STRETCH-SHORTEN
in body mass; however, it can also The location of the upper body’s COM
CYCLE PROPULSIVE POWER AND
LANDING ABILITY be developed by maintaining strength has been shown to affect the final posi-
Phase 3 of this progression model and reducing body mass. In particular, tion of the knee during landing (6),
should focus on exercises and techni- reducing body mass by decreasing particularly during single-leg landings.
ques aimed at developing propulsive body fat is advocated as this increases When landing is projected from a me-
power and landing ability. The impact the athlete’s functional body mass. diolateral direction or when landing
forces experienced during jump land- Given the association between from a perturbed jump, balance is
ings are inherently larger and have decreased strength and increased injury maintained predominately through
Figure 12. Reaction jump-landing drill: left to right—the athlete starts with a 1808 turn and then reacts and attempts to catch
a thrown ball. The athlete can also be instructed to land on a certain foot.
Padua DA. The effects of feedback with Stone M, Ratamess M, and Triplett- 41. Myer GD, Ford KR, McLean SG, and
and without strength training on lower McBride T. Progression models in Hewett TE. The effects of plyometric
extremity biomechanics. Am J Sports Med resistance training for healthy adults. Med versus dynamic stabilization and balance
37: 1301–1308, 2009. Sci Sport Exerc 34: 364–380, 2002. training on lower extremity biomechanics.
19. Hewett T, Myer G, and Ford K. Decrease in 31. Kraemer W and Newton R. Developing Am J Sports Med 34: 445–455, 2006.
neuromuscular control about the knee with explosive muscular power: Implications for 42. Myer GD, Ford KR, Palumbo JP, and
maturation in female athletes. J Bone Joint a mixed methods training strategy. Natl Str Hewett TE. Neuromuscular training
Surg 86: 1601–1608, 2004. Cond Assoc J 16: 20–31, 1994. improves performance and lower-extremity
20. Hewett TE. Neuromuscular and hormonal 32. Kritz M, Cronin J, and Hume P. The biomechanics in female athletes.
factors associated with knee injuries in bodyweight squat: A movement screen for J Strength Cond Res 19: 51–60, 2005.
female athletes: Strategies for intervention. the squat pattern. Strength Cond J 31: 76– 43. Onate J, Guskiewicz K, Marshall S,
Sports Med 29: 313–327, 2000. 85, 2009. Giuliani C, Yu B, and Garrett W. Instruction
21. Hewett TE, Ford KR, Hoogenboom BJ, and 33. Kritz M, Cronin J, and Hume P. Using the of jump-landing technique using videotape
Myer GD. Understanding and preventing body weight forward lunge to screen an feedback: Altering lower extremity motion
acl injuries: Current biomechanical and athlete’s lunge pattern. Strength Cond J patterns. Am J Sports Med 33: 831–842,
epidemiologic considerations—Update 31: 15–24, 2009. 2005.
2010. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 5: 44. Otago L. Kinetic analysis of landings in
34. Lephart S, Abt J, Ferris C, Sell T, Nagai T,
234–251, 2010. netball: Is a footwork rule change required
Myers J, and Irrgang J. Neuromuscular and
22. Hewett TE, Paterno MV, and Myer GD. biomechanical characteristic changes in to decrease ACL injuries. J Sci Med Sport
Strategies for enhancing proprioception high school athletes: A plyometric versus 7: 85–95, 2004.
and neuromuscular control of the knee. basic resistance program. Br J Sports Med 45. Pappas E, Hagins M, Sheikhzadeh A,
Clin Orthop Relat Res 402: 76–94, 2002. 39: 932–938, 2005. Nordin M, and Rose D. Biomechanical
23. Hewett TE, Stroupe AL, Nance TA, and 35. Lephart SM, Ferris CM, Riemann BL, differences between unilateral and
Noyes FR. Plyometric training in female Myers JB, and Fu FH. Gender Differences bilateral landings from a jump: Gender
athletes decreased impact forces and in strength and lower extremity kinematics differences. Clin J Sport Med 17:
increased hamstring torques. Am J Sports during Landing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 263–268, 2007.
Med 24: 765–773, 1996. 401: 162–169, 2002. 46. Powell JW and Barber-Foss KD. Sex-
24. Hopper D, Elliot B, and Lalor J. A 36. McClay IR, Robinson JR, Andriacchi TP, related injury patterns among selected high
descriptive epidemiology of netball injuries school sports. Am J Sports Med 28:
Frederick EC, Gross T, Martin P, Valiant G,
during competition: A 5 year study. Br J 385–391, 2000.
Williams KR, and Cavanagh PR. A profile of
Sports Med 29: 1–6, 1995.
ground reaction forces in professional 47. Roig M, O’Brien K, Kirk G, Murray R,
25. Hrysomallis C. Relationship between basketball./Un profil des forces de reaction McKinnon P, Shadgan B, and Reid WD.
balance ability, training and sports injury du sol en basketball professional. J Appl The effects of eccentric versus concentric
risk. Sports Med 37: 547–556, 2007. Biomech 10: 222–236, 1994. resistance training on muscle strength and
26. Huston L and Wojtys E. Neuromuscular 37. McNair P, Prapavessis H, and Callender K. mass in healthy adults: A systematic review
performance characteristics in elite female Decreasing landing forces: Effect of with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 43:
athletes. Am J Sports Med 24: 427–436, instruction. Br J Sports Med 34: 293–296, 556–568, 2009.
1996. 2000. 48. Steele J and Milburn P. Ground reaction
27. Ireland M. Anterior cruciate ligament injury 38. McNitty-Gray JL. Kinetics of the lower forces on landing in netball. J Hum Mov
in female athletes: Epidemiology. J Athl extremities during drop landings from Stud 13: 399–410, 1987.
Train 34: 150–154, 1999. three heights. J Biomech 26: 1037–1046, 49. Storey A and Smith H. Unique aspects of
28. King D and Zatsiorsky V. Periods of 1993. competitive weightlifting: Performance,
extreme ankle displacement during one- 39. Myer GD, Ford KR, Brent J, and Hewett TE. training and physiology. Sport Med 42:
legged standing. Gait and Posture 15: The effects of plyometric vs dynamic 769–790, 2012.
172–179, 2002. stabilization and balance training on power, 50. Tricoli V, Lamas L, Carnevale R, and
29. Kovacs I, Tihanyi J, Devita P, Racz L, balance, and landing force in female Ugrinowitsch C. Short-term effects on
Barrier J, and Hortobagyi T. Foot placement athletes. J Strength Cond Res 20: 345– lower-body functional power development:
modifies kinematics and kinetics during 353, 2006. Weightlifting vs. vertical jump training
drop jumping. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31: 40. Myer GD, Ford KR, and Hewett TE. programs. J Strength Cond Res 19: 433–
708–716, 1999. Methodological approaches and rationale 437, 2005.
30. Kraemer W, Adams K, Cafarelli E, Dudley G, for training to prevent anterior cruciate 51. Turner C and Robling A. Exercises for
Dooly C, Feigenbaum M, Fleck S, Franklin B, ligament injuries in female athletes. Scand improving bone strength. Br J Sports Med
Fry A, Hoffman R, Newton R, Potteiger J, J Med Sci Sports 14: 275–285, 2004. 39: 188–189, 2005.