UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2023

UEMX 2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II GROUP ASSIGNMENT

Cover
UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN
ACADEMIC YEAR 2023/2024
GROUP ASSIGNMENT

UEMX2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II

BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING (HONOURS) CIVIL ENGINEERING

Name Student ID
TERRY TAN AN YIK 1902841
ARAVINDA REDDY A/L THIAKARAJAN 2006150
ONG CHONG XIAN 2006615
SHIO ZIN-E 2004920
THONG JUN JET 1902990

Marking Guidelines

Items Allocated Marks Scored Marks

Hand calculations - loading
20% 20%
analysis and design for column
Hand calculation for
 Footings (Size estimation)
20%
or 20%
 Pile caps (Size estimation)
Hand calculation for
 Footings Design or
 Pile caps Design 20%
Design spreadsheet 40%
 Footing or
 Pile cap 20%

Layout drawing and detailing

 Layout plans 20%
 Footings or Pile caps 20%

Total 100% 100%

Ta le of Contents
Co er page ............................................................................................................................................................
Terry Tan An Yik (1902841) ................................................................................................................................
Marking Ru ric for Assignment .......................................................................................................................
Part 1 Loading analysis for Column Column ..................................................................................................
Part 2 Hand calculation for the Footing size estimation ...................................................................................
Part Hand calculations for designing Footing & Spreadsheet .......................................................................
Layout drawing and detailing ...........................................................................................................................
Ara inda Reddy A/L Thiakara an (2006150) .......................................................................................................
Marking Ru ric for Assignment .......................................................................................................................
Part 1 Loading analysis for Column Column ..................................................................................................
Part 2 Hand calculation for the Footing size estimation ...................................................................................
Part Hand calculations for designing Footing & Spreadsheet .......................................................................
Layout drawing and detailing ...........................................................................................................................
Ong Chong Xian (2006615)..................................................................................................................................
Marking Ru ric for Assignment .......................................................................................................................
Part 1 Loading analysis for Column Column ..................................................................................................
Part 2 Hand calculation for the Footing size estimation ...................................................................................
Part Hand calculations for designing Footing & Spreadsheet .......................................................................
Layout drawing and detailing ...........................................................................................................................
Shio Zin-E (2004920) ...........................................................................................................................................
Marking Ru ric for Assignment .......................................................................................................................
Part 1 Loading analysis for Column Column ..................................................................................................
Part 2 Hand calculation for the Footing size estimation ...................................................................................
Part Hand calculations for designing Footing & Spreadsheet .......................................................................
Layout drawing and detailing ...........................................................................................................................
Thong Jun Jet (1902990) ......................................................................................................................................
Marking Ru ric for Assignment .......................................................................................................................
Part 1 Loading analysis for Column Column ..................................................................................................
Part 2 Hand calculation for the Footing size estimation ...................................................................................
Part Hand calculations for designing Footing & Spreadsheet .......................................................................
Layout drawing and detailing ...........................................................................................................................
UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2022
UEMX 2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II GROUP ASSIGNMENT

UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN

ACADEMIC YEAR 2022/2023
GROUP ASSIGNMENT

UEMX2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II

BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING (HONOURS) CIVIL ENGINEERING

Name Student ID
TERRY TAN AN YIK 1902841

Marking Guidelines
Items Allocated Marks Scored Marks
Hand calculations - loading
analysis and design for column 15%
Design spreadsheet - loading 20%
analysis and design for column 5%

Hand calculation for

 Footings (Size estimation) 10%
20%
 Pile caps (Size estimation) 10%

Hand calculation for

 Footings Design 20%
 Pile caps Design 20%
Design spreadsheet 50%
 Footing 5%
 Pile cap 5%

Layout drawing and detailing

 Layout plans 5% 10%
 Footings & Pile caps 5%

Total 100% 100%

UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2023
UEMX 2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II GROUP ASSIGNMENT

Marking Rubric for Assignment

Part 1 Loading analysis for Column

Column (Hand calculation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with more than 6 errors.
Part 2 Hand calculation for the size
estimation
Footing or Pile cap (Size estimation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 1 error.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 3 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 5 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with more than 7 errors.
Part 3 Hand calculations for designing
Footing or Pile cap (Hand calculation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 1 error.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 3 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 5 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with more than 7 errors.
Footing or Pile cap (Spreadsheet)
Excellent– 20 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with no error.
Good – 15 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with more than 7 errors.
Layout drawing and detailing • Layout plans
• Footings or Pile caps
Excellent– 20 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with no error.
Good – 15 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with more than 8 errors.

1
 PART 1:
HAND CALCULATIONS FOR LOADING ANALYSIS FOR COLUMN (F/1) FROM STUMP TO
ROOF LEVEL


Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

 PART 2:
HAND CALCULATION FOR THE SIZE ESTIMATION OF A PAD FOOTINGS FULFILLING
THE SERVICEABILITY REQUIREMENTS


Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

 PART 3:
HAND CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGNING PAD FOOTINGS & DESIGN SPREADSHEET FOR
PAD FOOTINGS WITH SOIL BEARING CAPACITY = 200 kN/m2


Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

ARAVINDA REDDY A/L THIAKARAJAN 2006150

UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2023
UEMX 2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II GROUP ASSIGNMENT

Marking Rubric for Assignment

Part 1 Loading analysis for Column

Column (Hand calculation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with more than 6 errors.
Part 2 Hand calculation for the size
estimation
Footing or Pile cap (Size estimation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 1 error.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 3 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 5 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with more than 7 errors.
Part 3 Hand calculations for designing
Footing or Pile cap (Hand calculation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 1 error.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 3 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 5 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with more than 7 errors.
Footing or Pile cap (Spreadsheet)
Excellent– 20 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with no error.
Good – 15 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with more than 7 errors.
Layout drawing and detailing • Layout plans
• Footings or Pile caps
Excellent– 20 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with no error.
Good – 15 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with more than 8 errors.

1
 PART 1:

HAND CALCULATIONS FOR LOADING ANALYSIS FOR COLUMN (E/1) FROM STUMP TO
ROOF LEVEL
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
 Y
1500

H12-250-BT
750

225

SECTION Y-Y
H12-250-BT
1500 225

400

750

H12-250-BB
X H12-250-BB X

300
Y

750 750

400

DRAWN BY: ARAVINDA REDDY A/L THIAKRAJAN [2006150]

300

UEMX 2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II

H12-250-BT H12-250-BB
SECTION X-X
ALL DIMENSION
SCALE 1:40 IN MM
PAD FOOTING
UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2022
UEMX 2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II GROUP ASSIGNMENT

UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN

ACADEMIC YEAR 2022/2023
GROUP ASSIGNMENT

UEMX2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II

BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING (HONOURS) CIVIL ENGINEERING

Name Student ID
THONG JUN JET 1902990

Marking Guidelines
Items Allocated Marks Scored Marks
Hand calculations - loading
analysis and design for column 15%
Design spreadsheet - loading 20%
analysis and design for column 5%

Hand calculation for

 Footings (Size estimation) 10%
20%
 Pile caps (Size estimation) 10%

Hand calculation for

 Footings Design 20%
 Pile caps Design 20%
Design spreadsheet 50%
 Footing 5%
 Pile cap 5%

Layout drawing and detailing

 Layout plans 5% 10%
 Footings & Pile caps 5%

Total 100% 100%

UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2023
UEMX 2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II GROUP ASSIGNMENT

Marking Rubric for Assignment

Part 1 Loading analysis for Column

Column (Hand calculation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with more than 6 errors.
Part 2 Hand calculation for the size
estimation
Footing or Pile cap (Size estimation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 1 error.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 3 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 5 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with more than 7 errors.
Part 3 Hand calculations for designing
Footing or Pile cap (Hand calculation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 1 error.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 3 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 5 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with more than 7 errors.
Footing or Pile cap (Spreadsheet)
Excellent– 20 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with no error.
Good – 15 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with more than 7 errors.
Layout drawing and detailing • Layout plans
• Footings or Pile caps
Excellent– 20 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with no error.
Good – 15 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with more than 8 errors.

1
 PART 1:
HAND CALCULATIONS FOR LOADING ANALYSIS FOR COLUMN (F/1) FROM STUMP TO
ROOF LEVEL
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Designspecifications

life:50
Design years

class:X C3
Exposure

R60 fire resistance

size of 20mm
=

aggregates
concrete strength, Jck > superstructure 25N mm"
=

substructure 30N
=

mm"

of bar fyw mm2

Yield strength and shear link, tyk and 500N
=

s lab
A

slab 1 50
thickness: mm

sunken slab (toilet, bathroom, kitchen):1 25mm

slab
assume
non-suspended

i) Ist and ground slab

Gp, finishes 10
=

kN m2

floor:2.0kN m"
Ok,

2.5 kN m2
Qu, stairs:

ii) Roof slab

GK, finishes:1.5 kN m2

Qk =
2.0kN m2

B B rick wall

wall plaster thickness:110mm 20mm

+
+

G1, Wall=2.6 kN m2

C Beam

Beam dimension:225mm 300mm

x

D Column

Column dimension:2 25 mm 400mm

x
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

column DI

Roof floor

14 >2A? >3A
2810 1786

slab
analysis
RS 2
2810

Ly 4596
I
- 1.84 2 (two way slabs
↳x 2500
17003400

2
tan 45°=
1250
RS 3
=

x 1270 mm

12502508
RS 3
RS 2

4596
3400
Ly - - 1.2 <2 (two way slab) illustration
Lu 2810

x
tan 450 =

1700

R -
1700 mm
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

permanent load

RS2

i)aluminium roof (0.45mm gauge length, self-weight:

0.014kN m2)

Gp, roof= 0.014kN m2 x 1250m

I 0.018kN m

ii) aluminium, purlin I self-weight 3.208kg

=

m)

GK, purlin=3.208 kg m 9.81kN

x
m

1000

I
0.031kN m

iii) aluminium trusses

(self-weight 0.3
=

kN m2

Gp, truss 0.3 kN m2

=

1.250m
x

I
0.375 kN m

iv) beam (22530, self-weight 25kN

=

m3
m3
GK, beam:25kN 0.225m
x 0.3
x m

- 1.69 kN m

v) slab (150 mm, 22530, self-weight:25kN m3

GK, slab 25kN

=
m 0.150m
x x 1.250m

I
4.69 kN
m

vi) floor finishes (self-weight 1.5kN

=

m2

GK, finishes:1.5 kN m x 1.250m

1.88
=
kN m
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

RS 3

i)aluminium roof (0.45mm gauge length, self-weight:

0.014kN m2)

Gp, roof 0.014kN

=

m2 x
1.7 m

I
0.024 kN m

ii) aluminium, purlin I self-weight 3.208kg

=

m)

GK, purlin=3.208kg m 9.81

x

1000

I
0.031kN m

iii) aluminium trusses

(self-weight 0.3
=

kN m2

Gp, truss 0.3 kN m2 1.7

=

x m

=0.51 kN m

iv) beam (22530, self-weight 25kN

=

m3
m3
GK, beam:25kN 0.225m
x 0.3
x m

-
1.69 kN m

v) slab (150 mm, 22530, self-weight:25kN m3

GK, slab 25kN

=
m 0.150m
x x 1.7 m

=6.38 kN
m

vi) floor finishes (self-weight 1.5kN

=

m2

GK, finishes:1.5 kN m x 1.7m

2.55
=
kN m
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

variable load

RS 2

i) wind load (minimum design, 0.651kN m2

Ok, wind 0.651

=

x 1.25m

I
2.81 kN m

ii) imposed load, roof (x<300 non-accesible roof, unless

maintenance
=

0.25 kN m2)

Ok, roof 0.25

= kNm" 1.25 m
x

I 0.31 kN m

slab (roof=2.0kN m2)

Ok, slab 2.0kN

=

m2 x 1.25
m

=2.5 kN m

RS 3

i) wind load (minimum design, 0.651kN m2

Ok, wind 0.651

=

x 1.7 m

I
1.11 kN m

ii) imposed load, roof (x<300 non-accesible roof, unless

maintenance 0.25
=

kN m2)

Ok, roof 0.25kNm"

=
1.7
x m

I
0.43 kN m

slab (roof=2.0kN m2)

Ok, slab 2.0kN

=

m2 x 1.7 m

=3.4 kN m
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Action
analysis
Beam RBD1- 2

[Gk (0.018 0.031 0.375 1.69 4.69 1.88 0.024 + 0.031

+

=
+
+ + + +

0.51 6.38
+
2.55)kNm
+

- 18. 18 kN m

IQ, (2.81
=
+
0.31 +
2.5 + 1.11 0.43
+

3.4)
+ kN m

10.56 kN
=

Wa 1.35 (18.18)
=

1.5(10.56)
+

- 40.38 kN m

WL
shear=
2

- 40.38 kN m 2.81
x m

56.73
=

kN

wL"
Moment:

12

=40.38 kN m x (2.81 m)

=
159.42 kNm

40.38kNm

159.42
-
~v
↓ 159.42 RB D 1 -
2

2.Y
-
2
X A

56.73 56.73
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Beam RB 1 D-E

[Gk (0.018 0.031 0.375 1.69 4.69 1.88) kN

+ +
+ + +

m
=

8.68
=
kN m

IQk =
(0.81 + 0.31 2.5)
+

kN m

-
3.62 kN m

1.35(8.68) 1.5(3.62)
Wa
I +

-
17. 15kN m

wL
Shear=
2

17. 15 2.5
x
-

-
21.44 kN

2
WL
Moment:
12

=17.15 x 2.52
12

I 8.93 kNm

1.15kN m

8.93

-x2V2.5
-
↓
a
8.93 RB 1 D -

21.44 21.44
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Beam RB 1 2- D

[Gk (0.024 =
+

0.031 0.51
+

1.69
+
+
6.38 +

2.55) kN m

- 11. 19 kN m

IQ, (2.81 =

+ 0.31 2.5)
+

kN m

- 5.62 kN m

1.35 (11.19) 1.5(5.62)

Wa
I +

- 23.54kN m

wL
Shear=
2

23 54 x 3.4
-

-
40.02 kN

2
WL
Moment:
12

- 23.54x 3.42
12

22.68 kNm
=

22 -
68
~
23.54KNm↓
xv v
A
2
22.68 RB 1 c -
D

3.4

40.02 40.02

Member -
stiffness

i) minor ax is
-

x
54 K beam
= 0.5 x bh
2 122

2810

0.3
E 2568 3150
=

0.5 x
0.225 X

12 X 2. 81

3
9.01
= 10-5
x m

b43
kcolumn =

12L

column clear
height 3150mm -300mm 0.43
=

0.2 2 5 x
=

12 2.85
x
=2850 mm

4.21 10-4m
=

Ik 9.01
=
x 10-5 +

4.21 x 10
-
4

-
5.11 10-4m
x

DFof column 4.21 x10-4m

=

I1
5. 10-4 m
x

0.8 2
=
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

40.38 X 2.812
moment
12

26.57 kN
=

column moment, RF =
0.8 2 (26.57 kNM)

=21. 79 kNm

ii mayor axis

K beam
= 0.5 x bh
122
3400
2
D

=
0.225 X
0.3
0.5 x
2810
12 X 3 4
2568
·

E
3150
- 7.44 10-5
x m3

K beam bh?
0.5 X
=

2 122

column clear
height 3150mm
=

-300mm =

0.5
0.225 0.33
x
X

=2850 12 X 2.5
mm

1.01
=
x 10-4 m3

b43
kcolumn =

12L

=0.4 0
x -
2253
12 2.85
x

1.33 4
m
-

I
X
10

Ik = 7.44 10-5
x 1.01
+

x 10-4 + 1.33x104

3.08
=

x10-4 m

1.33 x 10-4m3
DFof column =

10-4
3.08 x m
- 0.43

moment
0.43(22.68 -8.93)
=

-
5.91 kN m

roof bottom side, 56.73 +21.44 +40.02

NEd, btm

118.
=
19 kN
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

First floor

14 S2A) 3A
2810 1786

slab
analysis
IS 3

Ly 4596
I
- 1.84 2 (two way slabs
↳x 2500

2
tan 45°=
1250
2810
=

x 1270 mm

17003400
Fs 4

3400 Fs4
Ly - - 1.2 <2 (two way slab)
Lu 2810

12502508
x
tan 450 - FS3
1700
4596

R =1700mm illustration
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

↑ermanent load

FS 3

1)Beam (self-weight 25kN

=

m3

GK, beam 25kN

=
m3 0.225m
x 0.3m
x

1.69 kN
=

ii) Slab (self-weight 25kN

=

m3

GK, slab 25kN

=
m3 x 0.150m 1.25m
x

4.69 kN
=

iii) Floor finishes (outdoor slab, self weight 1.5kN

=

m2)

GK, finishes:1.5 kN m2 1.25m

x

=1.88 kN m

iv) Brick wall

(self-weight 2.6
=
kN m2)

GK, wall 2.6 kN m2 X (3.15m -0.3m)

-
7.41 kN m

FS 4

1)Beam (self-weight 25kN

=

m3

GK, beam 25kN

=
m3 0.225m
x 0.3m
x

1.69 kN
=

ii) Slab (self-weight 25kN

=

m3

GK, slab 25kN

=
m3 X 0.150m 1.7
x m

6.38 kN
=

iii) Floor finishes (outdoor slab, self weight 1.5kN

=

m2)

GK, finishes:1.5 kN m2 1.7m

x

- 2.55 kN m

iv) Brick wall

(self-weight 2.6
=
kN m2)

GK, wall 2.6 kN m2 X (3.15m -0.3m)

-
7.41 kN m
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

variable load

FS3

Imposed load, slab (floor 2.0kN

=

m2)

Ok, slab 2.0kN

=
m2 1.25
x m

=2.5 kN m

FS 4

Imposed load, slab (floor 2.0kN

=

m2)

Ok, slab 2.0kN

=
m2 1.7
x m

=3.4 kN m

Beam D 1-2

1.88 7.41 6.38 2.55

1.69 4.69
+ +

IG,
+
+
+
=

24.6
=

kN m

2.5kN 3.4 kN
IQ1 m + m
=

5.9
=

kN m

Wp 1.35(24.6)
= 1.5(5.9)
+

-
42.06 kN m

4 2.06
shear: X 2.81

- 59.09 kN M

42.00 x 2.812
Moment
=

12

-
27.68 kNm

en

27.68

~to↓ a
27.68
RB D 1 -
2

59.09 59.09
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

FB 1 D -

IGp =
1.69 +

4.69 +
1.88 7.41
+

= 15.67 kN m

IQ1 2.5kN
=
m

I 2.5 kN m

Wa= 1.35(15.67) 1.5(2.5)

+

- 24.9 Nm

24.9
shear: X 2.5

- 31.13 kN M

24.9 x
2.52
Moment I

12

-
12.97 kNM

~24.9K↓
e

12.97 12.97 RB I
D- E
2
A
2500

31.13 31.13
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

FB 1c -
D

Gr
& 1.69
=
+

6.38 2.55
+

+ 7.41

18.03 kN
=

3.4kN
IQ1
=

Wp 1.35(18.03)
= 1.5(3.4)
+

=29.44 kN m

29.44
shear: X 3 ·

50.05kN
=

Moment= 29.44X 3.42

12

28.36
= kNM

NkN m

28.36
-
X
↓
A
2
28.36 RB Ic -
D

3400

50.05 50.05
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Member stiffness

i) minor axis

3150 -

D 3400 K beam
bh
= 0.5 x
2 122

2810

0.3
E 2568 3150
=

0.5 x
0.225 X

12 X 2. 81

3
9.01
= 10-5
x m

b4
Kcolumn, top: 12L

column clear 3150mm

height -300mm 0.4
=

0.2 2 5 x
=

=2850 12 2.85
x
mm

3
4.21 10-4
=

x M

5
10-4
-

Ik 9.01 10 4.21 bh
x2
Kcolumn,
x x
+

bottom:
=

12L
9.32
=

x 10-4m
=

0.2 2 5 0.4
x

DFof 4.21 10-4m

column, top
x
12 2.85
x
=

9.32 x
10-4 m
3
4.21 10-4m
=

-
x
0.45

DFof 4.21 10-4m

column,
x
bottom =

9.32 x
10-4 m
-
0.45

42.06 X 2. 812
moment
12

27.68
kN
=

column moment, top=0.45

IF
(27.68 kNM)

- 12.46 kNm

column moment, IF
bottom
0.45 =

(27.68 kNM)

- 12.46 kNm
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

ii major axis

L
3150 K beam
= 0.5 x bh
122
3400
2
D

=
0.225 X
0.3
0.5 x
2810
12 X 3 4
2568
·

E
3150 5
7.44 m
-

- 10
x

K beam
= 0.5 x bh
2 122

column clear
height 3150mm
=

-300mm =

0.5 x
0.225 0.33
x

=2850 12 X 2.5
mm

1.01
= 10-4
x m

Kcolumn, top=K column, bottom

1.33
=

x
10-4m

Ik 7.44
=
x 10-5 1.01
+
x 10
-
4
2(1.33 154
+
x

4
-
4.4 1
-

10
x

1.33 10-4m3
DFof column, top=
x

4. 10-4 m
41 x
-
0.30

1.33 10-4m3
DFof column bot to m -
x

S
4. 10-4 m
41 x
-
0.30

moment -
12.97 kN m
D-E

moment
-
28.36 kNm
c-D

column moment
top-column moment
bottom

=0.3(28.36-
12.97)
=

4.62 kNm
GK, IF 1.35
column: (25 kN m2
x
0.225mx 0.4m)
x
3.15m
x

=
9.57 kN

IF, NEd, top

-
NEd, RF
+ GK, IF
column

118.19 + 9.57
=

-
127.76 kN
IF, NEd, bottom 127.76
=

59.09
+ 31.13
+
+

50.05 268.03 kN
=
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Ground floor

14 S2A) 3A
2810 1786

slab
analysis
GS 3

Ly 4596
I
=1.84 2 (two way slabs
↳x 2500

2
tan 45°=
1250
2810
=

x 1270 mm

17003400

GS4

3400 Gs4
Ly - - 1.2 <2 (two way slab)
Lu 2810
1250
2500

x
tan 450 =
GS 3
1700
4596

R -
1700 mm
illustration
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

permanent load

GS 3

1)Beam (self-weight 25kN

=

m3

GK, beam 25kN

=
m3 0.225m
x 0.3m
x

1.69 kN
=

ii) Slab (self-weight 25kN

=

m3, non-suspended)
GK, slab
0
=
kN m

iii) Brick wall

(self-weight 2.6
=
kN m2)

GK, wall 2.6 kN m2 X (3.15m -0.3m)

-
7.41 kN m

GS 4

1)Beam (self-weight 25kN

=

m3

GK, beam 25kN

=
m3 0.225m
x 0.3m
x

1.69 kN
=

ii) Slab (self-weight 25kN

=

m3, non-suspended)
kN
GK, slab
0
=
m

iii) Brick wall

(self-weight 2.6
=
kN m2)

GK, wall 2.6 kN m2 X (3.15m -0.3m)

-
7.41 kN m
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

at
riable
Imposed load, slab (non-suspended slab)

Ok, slab 0 kN
=

Beam GB D 1-2

IGp =
1.69 +
7.41

9.10
=
kN m

IQ, 0
=
kN m

Wa 1.35(9.10)
=
+
1.5 (0)

12.29 kN
=

12.29 x 2.81
shear:
2

=
17.27 kN

2
1 2.2 9 2.81
x
Moment:
12

-
8.89 kN m

&12.29kN m

8. O9

- 2
-

X
~zso
↓
A
2
8.09 GB D1 -
2

17.27 17.27
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Beam GB 1 D-E

IGp 1.69
=
7.41
+

9.10
=
kN m

IQ, 0
=
kN m

Wa 1.35(9.10)
=
+
1.5 (0)

12.29 kN
=

2.5
12.29 x
shear:
2

I
15.36 kN

1 2.2 9 2.52
x
Moment:
12

- 6.40 kN m

12.29↓
e

6.40 6.40 1 D- E
GB
- 2
-

A
2500

15.3b
15.36

Beam GB I C -
D

IGp 1.69
= +
7.41

9.10
=
kN m

IQ, = 0 kN m

Wa 1.35(9.10)
=
1.5
+

(0)

12.29 kN
=

12.29 x 3.4
shear:
2

20.89
=

kN

Moment: 1 2.2 9 3.4

x

12

- 11.84 kN M

=12.29↓
e

11.84 11.84 Ic
GB -
D
-
-

X a

20.89 20.89
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

ber
# stiffness

minor axis

0.3

I
K
beam
0.50.225
= X
x

12 x 2.81
3150

9.01
=

10-5m3
x
2818

1250

0.225 0.4
x

stump K
column, top=
12 2.85
x

4.21
=
10-4m
x

K 0.225 0.4
x
column, bottom
=

12 0.9
x

-
3 3
I
1.33 10
x M

-> k 9.01x10-5
=
4.21
+

x10-4 1.33 x10-3

+

=
1.84 10
x
- 3
m

4
4.21
-

10
x
DF
column, top=
1.84 x 10-3

0.23
=

1.33 x 10-3
DE
column, bottom =

3
1.84
-

10
x

-
0.72

12.29 2.812
x
Moment=
12

-
8.09 kNm

column moment, top 0.23 (8.09)

=

1.86
=

Column moment, bottom 0.72(8.09)

=

5.82
=
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

i)major axis

x
54 K beam

2
= 0.5 x bh
122

=
0.225 X
0.3
0.5 x
2810
12 X 3.4
E 2568 3150 5 3
7.44
-

- 10
x m

K beam
= 0.5 x bh
2 122

column clear
height 3150mm
=

-300mm =

0.5 x
0.225 0.33
x

=2850 12 X 2.5
mm

1.01
= 10-4
x m3

kcolumn 0.4 x 0.2253

top
-
,

12 2.85
x

3
4
1.33 x
-

I 10 m

K 0.4 x 0.2253
column, bottom =

12 0.9
x

I 10-4
4.22 x m

Ik 7.44x10-5
=
1.01x10
+
-

4
+
1.33x10-4 +

4.22
-
4
x 10

=
7.30 x 10-4m
1.33 10-4 m3
DFof column, top=
x

7.30 x 10- 4m
-
0.18

4.22 10
-
4
m
DFof column, bottom:
x

10 4
7.30 x m
-

-
0.58

moment
p-E -
6.40 kN m

moment
-
11.84 kNm
c-D

column moment
top 0.18(11.84
= -

6.40)
0.98
=

column moment
bottom 0.58
=
(11.84 -6.40)
3.16
=

I
4.62 kNm
GK, GF
1.35
column: (25 kN m2
x
0.225mx 0.4m)
x
3.15m
x

=
9.57 kN
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

GF, NEd, top NEd, =

IF
+ GK, GF column

268.03 9.57
=
+

= 277.6 kN
GF, NEd, bottom 277.6
=
+
17.27
+
15.36 20.89
+
331.12
=
kN

Loading analysis

GK, stump 1.35

=
x (25kN m2 0.225m
x 0.4m
x x
1.2m)

=
3.65 kN

331.12 3.65
Top stump
=
+

- 334.77 kN

Results

Moment (kNm)

Floor
Ned (kN) Minor
Major
1 118. 19 5.91
bottom
RF 26.57

2.
IF 12.46
top 127.76 4.62

3. 268.03
IF
b ottom 4.62 12.46

4. 1.86
GF top 277.60 0.98

5.
GF
bottom 331-12 4.62 5.82

6.
Stump top
334.77
D 0

S FD BMD;major BMD;minor

118. 19 5.91 26.57

3.15

268.03 4- 62
4 62
-

X 12.46
127.76 12.46

3.15

331.12
4.62 0.98 5.82
X 1.86
277.60

1.2

Mmajor
M
kNm
=

334.77
Mminor kNm
=

Ned (kN)
 PART 2:
HAND CALCULATION FOR THE SIZE ESTIMATION OF A PAD FOOTINGS FULFILLING
THE SERVICEABILITY REQUIREMENTS

PART 3:
HAND CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGNING PAD FOOTINGS & DESIGN SPREADSHEET FOR
PAD FOOTINGS WITH SOIL BEARING CAPACITY = 200 kN/m2
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Classification of column D1

RF > IF

1) Dimension of column and beam

minor axis

225 300
beam= x mm

column 225
= x 400 mm

clear 300mm
height 3150mm
=

-
2850mm

major axis

225 300
beam= x mm

column 400
= x 225 mm

clear -300mm
height 3150mm
=

=2850 mm

of and beam
ii) moment of inertia column

column

Iz
bh
=

12

-
400 225
x

12

8
-
3.8 10
x

=bh
Iy 12

-
225x 400
12

1.2 109
=x

beam

3003
225x
Iz
12

-
5.1 108
x
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

K
iii) stiffness,

column
8
3.8 10
x

kzz =

2858

5
- 1.33 x 10

9
1.2 10
x

Kyy
-

2850

-
4.21 105
x

beam

8
5. 1 10
x
k -

22,
3400

-
1.5
x 105

5.1 108
x
kzzz
=

2500

- 2.04x 105
8
5.1 10
x
Kyy =

2810

- 1.81 x 105

iv) relative column stiffness

2-2 ax is
1.33 105
x
k I

2(1.5 x105 2.04

+
105)
x

-
0.19

is
y y ax
-

k =
4.21 x 105

2(1.81x105)

-
1.2
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

of column
effective
2)
length

10,2 0.5(2850)
(1+ 0.457) C'to. 518-19)
=

=1800mm

1.2
lo,y 0.5(2850)
(1+0.45 1.2) (to.4.2)
=

=2500mm

vi)Radius of
gyration, I

izz (E)0.5
=

8
3.8 10 0.5

=)
x

225x400
S
I 65

(FY)
0.5

izy
=

109 0.5

=(
1.2
C
x

225 400
x

-
120

viil slenderness ratio, Xact

1800
act,
*
65

I
28

X 2500
act, y -

120

-
21
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

X
viii) Slenderness limit, lim

200 ABC
Nim=
M

A
=
0.7, B 1 =
-
1 =1.7 -rm
c

Y5d
=

-
127.76x103

(225 400)x 14.17

-
0.1

0.85 Jck
Jad I

Wa
- 0.85x25

1.5

I
14. 17 N mm

5.91 kNm
-
6.95 kNm

4.62 kNm
12.46 kNm
2- Z moment
moment
y-y
4.62 6.95
rmz
Wmy=
=

5.91 12.46

=
0.78 -
0.56
-

C2 Cy
=

2.48 2.26
=

:Nim,z=1207.74> Xact:Nim, y 1100>

=

Xact

it is a short column
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

RF > IF

1) Dimension of column and beam

minor axis

225 300
beam= x mm

column 225
= x 400 mm

clear 300mm
height 3150mm
=

-
2850mm

major axis

225 300
beam= x mm

column 400
= x 225 mm

clear -300mm
height 3150mm
=

=2850 mm

of and beam
ii) moment of inertia column

column

Iz
bh
=

12

- 400 225
x

12

8
38
-
-
10
x

bu
Iy =

12

-
225 40
x o

12

9
=1.2 10
x

beam

225 3003
x

Iz
12

5.1
= x 108
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

K
iii) stiffness,

column
8
3.8 10
x

kzz =

2858

5
- 1.33 x 10

9
1.2 10
x

Kyy
-

2850

-
4.21 105
x

beam

8
5. 1 10
x
k -

22,
3400

-
1.5
x 105

5.1 108
x
kzzz
=

2500

- 2.04x 105
8
5.1 10
x
Kyy =

2810

- 1.81 x 105

iv) relative column stiffness

2-2 ax is
1.33 105
x
k I

2(1.5 x105 2.04

+
105)
x

-
0.19

is
y y ax
-

k =
4.21 x 105

2(1.81x105)

-
1.2
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

of column
effective
2)
length

10,2 0.5(2850)
(1+ 0.457) C'to. 518-19)
=

=1800mm

1.2
lo,y 0.5(2850)
(1+0.45 1.2) (to.4.2)
=

=2500mm

vi)Radius of
gyration, I

izz (E)0.5
=

8
3.8 10 0.5

=)
x

225x400
S
I 65

(FY)
0.5

izy
=

109 0.5

=(
1.2
C
x

225 400
x

-
120

viil slenderness ratio, Xact

1800
act,
*
65

I
28

X 2500
act, y -

120

-
21
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

X
viii) Slenderness limit, lim

200 ABC
Nim=
M

A
=
0.7, B 1 =
-
1 =1.7 -rm
c

Y5d
=

-
277.6x103

(225 400)
x 14.17

-
0.22

0.85 Jck
Jad I

Wa
- 0.85x25

1.5

I
14. 17 N mm

-
4.62kNm
-
12.46kNm

0.98 kNm
1.86 kNm
2- Z moment
moment
y-y
0.98 1.86
(mz
4.62 Wmy=
=

12.46

=-
0.21 -

0.56

Cz -
1.91 cy 2.26
=

...
Xim,z - 63 > Nact:Nim, y 74> Xact =

it is a short column
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Designspecifications

life:50
Design years

class:X C3
Exposure

R60 fire resistance

size of 20mm
=

aggregates
concrete strength, Jck > superstructure 25N mm"
=

substructure 30N
=

mm"

of bar fyw mm2

Yield strength and shear link, tyk and 500N
=

NEd 334.77
=
kN

Footing sizing
NEd (ULS) 334.77
=
kN

NEd (SLS) 334.77

=
kN

1.35 1.5 +

=
234.93 kN

(234.93kN)
Estimating footing self-weight 10%
=

-
23.49 kN

SLS
loading 234.93
=

Total +
23.49

=258.42 kN

ISLs
Area of
footing required: loading
soil
capacity

=258.42kN

200kN m2

=1.29m2

Estimated size= (1.29m2)0.5

= 1.14m (use 1.2 m)

d NEd
Effective depth, =

Vrd, max
x Uo

NEd, r2S
334.77 kN
=

Vrd, max 0.5

=

(0.6 (1-3)) (15)

5.28 Nmm"
=

40 (225mm 400mm)
=

2 +

=1250mm
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

334.77 103
x
↓ min
-

5.28 x 1250

50.72 mm

Estimated thickness, h dmin+

=

(nom + 0.50
bar

50.72
=

40
+ +

0.5(12)

I
96.72 mm

1.5m 1.5m
Hence, try x 0.3m
x

1.5m 1.5m 0.3mx

Actual
footing self-weight checking
x x
=

25 kN m

16.88 kN 23.49kN
=

<

Max soil pressure

"

(1.5m)
Footing area =

=2.25m2

4.62
moment:
SLS design 1.35 1.5
+

-
3.24 kN m

y 0.5h
=

0.5(1.5m)
=

=0.75m

I
bh3
=

12

3
-
1.5 (1.5)
12

-
0.42 m4

P ISLS
My
=

+
area I

258.42 3.24(0.75)
-
I
2.25 0.42

=120.64kN m2 ( soil
bearing capacity 200kN
m2
=

Load Analysis
334.77 kN
NEd (ULS)
=

NEd(ULS)
soil
pressure (ULS) =

Area

-
334.77kN
m2
2.25

=148.79 kN m2

=148.79kN metre
per length
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

a ⑭
750 750

I
L x 7

↑*
I so

is.2N per*m iength

!.. t
750

Umax 148.79
=
x 0.75m Umax 148.79
=
x 0.75m

=
I11.59 kN kN
m =
I11.59 m

Vcol face
=

148.79 0.6375
x Vcol face 148.79
=

X 0.55

-
94.85 kN m - 81.83 kN m

Il Il
750 750 750 750
L x 7 L x 7

30.23 ⑤ ⑤

M
1441.850.75 X
14879x 0.7582
max= Mmax -

2 2

41.85
=
kNm - 41.85 kNm

0.63752 552
Mcol-face 148.79
= x
Mcol-face 148.79
=
0.
x

2 2

30.23
=

kNM =22.50 kNM

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Nominal cover

C 0
min, b
=

main

-
12 mm

Cmin, dur= 25mm

Cdev= 10 mm

(nom=Cmin, dur+Cdev

=
25mm +
10 mm

=35mm

cast against prepared ground:m i n 40mm 7 35 mm

:. (nom 40mm
=

main reinforcement
(bending)
·bar= 12 mm

Effective depth, d 300 40-0.5(12)

=
-

=254mm

M 30.23 106
x
k =
-

bd2fck 1000 2542

x 30
x

<kmax
-
0.016 0.167
=

:. no
compression steel needed

2 d(0.5
=
+
0.2 5 -
0.016
(
1.134

=0.99d > 0.95d (max)

:. use 2 0.95d
=

0.95x254
=

241.3
-

mm

As, reg= M

0.87 fyk 2

- 30.23 x106

0.87 500
x 241.3
x

- 288mm2 m

fatm -
0.3 x fck"3
I
0.3 x 303

- 2.90

2.9
A s, min= 0.26 ( 500) bd

- 00015bd > 0.0015bd

=0.0015(1000) (254)
- 38 1mm2 m
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

As, 0.04Ac
=

max

0.04(1000 x300)
-

12,000 mm2
=

Main B Secondary rebars:H12-250

As, prov=452 mm2

shear reinforcement

i) vertical shear:I d
away
from column face

Design shear force:Ved 94.85-(148.79

=

x0.254)
-
57.06 kN m

shear resistance:Vrd,c 0.12K

=

(100, Jcx)'s bd

k 1
=

200
+

1 + 200

254

=
1.89 < 2.0

As, prov
1, =

bd

I 452

1000 254
x

=0.0018(< 0.0015,<0.02)
Vrd,c 0.1 2
=

1.89
x x (100 0.0018
x x 30)'s 1000
x x0.254

I
95.11 kN

minimum shear resistance

Umin= (0.035k2 Jck'z) bd

=0.035(1.89)2 30'2 1000

x 254
x

126.52 kN
=

Therefore,

Urd,c 126.52kN
=
> 57.06 kN
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

ii) Punching shear at

perimeter
Id from column face

d:300
Average depth, 40-12
-

248
=

mm

2d 2
=

(248)
=

496mm

control
perimeter, n 2
=
(225 400) +

2x(496)
+

= 4366.46mm

area within
perimeter, A (225
=

x
400) 2(225 x496) 2(400 x490)
+ +

π(496)2

=
1482882.06 mm"

-
1.48 m2

punching shear, VEd= 148.79kN(1.52 -1.482)

-
114.57 kN

114.57 x103
VRd =

4366.46x248

=
0.11 N mm2

shear resistance:
punching
Urd= 0.18

1.5
I
(100p, fcx)'s, I
but Vmin 0.035k fck'
=

=0.40N
mm2, Vmin= 0.5N mm2

:.
Vrb 0.5
=

Nmm2 > Ved 0.14N

=

mm2

iii) maximum punching shear resistance at column

perimeter

Vrd, max 0.5

=
Uod (0.6 (1-55)) fak
7.5

=1636.80kN > Ned= 334.77kN

Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

cracking

h 300mm
=

> 200mm

steel stress under quasi-permanent action:

action GK+0.3 QK
quasi-permanent
=

Gk ①k (Gx 0.3Qx)
+
-
Ned (kN)

2.81
19-13 X - 30.00
18.18 10.56 x 0.3 2

RF 3.62 0.3 9.01 2.5

x =12.21
8.68 x
2

0.3
3.4
11. 19 5.62 x 11.70 X =
21.89
2

(G, 0.3Qx) 2 Ned (kN)

=

Gk ①k
+

24.6 5.9 37.05

0.3
x

15.67 2.5 20.53

0.3
x

18.03 3.4
0.3
x 32.39

GK, column 1F-RF

9.57
=

Gk ①k (Gx 0.3Qx)
+
-
Ned (kN)

9.10 0 12.79

9.10 0 11.38

9.10 0 15.47

GK, 9.57
-
column GF-RE

Stump GK, stump 3.65

=

Total 216.5 kN
=
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

fyk As,
+, reg Quasi-permanent
Us
=

X X

As, prov ULS

500 288 216.5

-
X X
1.15 452 334.77

=179.16 Nmm2

For crack 0.3

design width =
mm

bar diameter to control 25

cracking:12mm
<
max mm

allowable bar
spacing:250mm
max

Actual max bar

spacing
250
=
-

2(2)
=238mm <250mm
UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2022
UEMX 2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II GROUP ASSIGNMENT

UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN

ACADEMIC YEAR 2022/2023
GROUP ASSIGNMENT

UEMX2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II

BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING (HONOURS) CIVIL ENGINEERING

Name Student ID
ONG CHONG XIAN 2006615

Marking Guidelines
Items Allocated Marks Scored Marks
Hand calculations - loading
analysis and design for column 15%
Design spreadsheet - loading 20%
analysis and design for column 5%

Hand calculation for

• Footings (Size estimation) 10%
20%
• Pile caps (Size estimation) 10%

Hand calculation for

• Footings Design 20%
• Pile caps Design 20%
Design spreadsheet 50%
• Footing 5%
• Pile cap 5%

Layout drawing and detailing

• Layout plans 5% 10%
• Footings & Pile caps 5%

Total 100% 100%

UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2023
UEMX 2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II GROUP ASSIGNMENT

Marking Rubric for Assignment

Part 1 Loading analysis for Column
Column (Hand calculation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with more than 6 errors.
Part 2 Hand calculation for the size
estimation
Footing or Pile cap (Size estimation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 1 error.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 3 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 5 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with more than 7 errors.
Part 3 Hand calculations for designing
Footing or Pile cap (Hand calculation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 1 error.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 3 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 5 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with more than 7 errors.
Footing or Pile cap (Spreadsheet)
Excellent– 20 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with no error.
Good – 15 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with more than 7 errors.
Layout drawing and detailing • Layout plans
• Footings or Pile caps
Excellent– 20 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with no error.
Good – 15 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with more than 8 errors.

1
 PART 1:
HAND CALCULATIONS FOR LOADING ANALYSIS FOR COLUMN (D/4) FROM STUMP TO
ROOF LEVEL
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Specification
column D4
Design :

Life 50 years
Design
:

class : ✗ c3
Exposure
Fine resistance
:
1260
20mm
Aggregate
:
size
'

concrete (superstructure) fck -25N 1mm

-

Characteristic strength of
,

of concrete(sub structure),fck=}oNimmi
strength
-

characteristic
of steel fyk -500 Nimmi
characteristic strength
-

Assumption

Column size b- 225mm h -400mm

-

: -

Beam size
: D= 225mm h= 300mm

EH 1991-1-1 Perimeter brick wall

= 2.6 KNIMZ
table 6.2
guy thickness 150mm
=

slab [toilet, kitchen] 125mm

=

sunken

soil
Assume ground floor is supported by .

stump height
=
900mm
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

EN 1991-1-1 T
) First floor & Ground floor slab :

table 6.2
↳ Gk finishes = to kN /m2
.

↳ QK 2.0kW /m2
floor ,
=

'

↳ QK stair = 2.5kW /m
,

Ii) Roof floor slab

↳ 1.54N /m2
G.K finishes
,
=

'
↳ QK = 2.OKNIM

Parti
LoadingAnaly 2

Roof floor
3286
↳y
< ,
n

121341
3400 1257 12516

V 121317 121336
r

/
121324
2500
RSZ 1258 RSA RSM
µ, , 121340
✓

fµÉ 1500
>
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

12582125ft
Assuming roofing are designed
as slab .

i.

( included truss roof covering purlin)

,
,

slab

¥, ??¥
< 2 : 2 way
1.67
.

=
=

i. ^

42500
"

i. u
R 0.75m
4-7
=

1500

EMMI-1-1 Permenanf Load :

length :
table 6.2 ☐ Aluminium roof [ 0.45mm gauge
self weight = 0-014 KNIN]

Gk roof
,
=
0.014kW/nix 0.75m
=
0.0105 KNIM

Ti) Aluminium 2- purlin [2-100×40×20×201

self weight 3.208kg/m )
-
=

GK , purlin =

3-208kqggg9.HN/m-
=
0.031 KNIM
0.3kW /MY
iii. ) Aluminium trusses [ self weight
-
=

'
0.75m
GK trusses
,
= 0.3 KNIM ✗

= 0.225 KNIM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

TV) 2510.225) (0.3)

Gk , Beam
=

-4.688 KNIM

4 Gk, finishes = 1-510.751

= 1-125 KNIM

Vi) GK slab = 2510.15) ( 0.75)

,

=
2813 KNIM

: since it is roof floor , therefore no self -

weight

of brick wall .

variabktoac.MS[
1553.2002 1) Wind Load minimum design : 0.65 KNIMZ ]

0 65 0.75
QK whet
,
= .
✗

= 0.488 KNIM

Load [✗ < 30:/ non accessible

roof except for
MSEH 1991-1-1 Ii) Imposed
-

Mt
2020 Manta hence I repair ] qk = 0.25kW/ .

QK , roof =
0.25 ✗ 0.75

=
0.188 KNIM
EH 1991 Hiii ) Imposed
-

load ,
slab [ roof
= 2.0 1-Ntm
]
table 6.2 0.75
QK slab
,
= 2.0 ✗

=
1.5 KNIM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

12572k€
Assuming roofing are designed
as slab .

i.

( included truss roof covering purlin)

,
,

slab
¥× =%÷
12 i. two way
= 1.03

i.
/
v
3400

✗ = I -643m
→
3286

permenanf-Load.it
Gk roof
,
= 0.014×1-643

= 0.023 KNIM

ID Gk purlin
,
=

3?%j
= 0.031 KNIM

Iii ) Gk
,trusses
=
0.3×1.643

=
0.493 KNIM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

N) GK , beam
= 25 (0.225110-3)
=
1.688 KNIM

V1 Gk , finishes =
1.5 ( 1.643)

= 2.465 KNIM

Vil GK Slab
.
=
2510.15) (1.643)

=
6.161 KNIM

: since it is roof floor , therefore no self -

weight

of brick wall .

Variableload
MS 1553.2002 1) Wind Load [ minimum design : 0.65kW/m2 )

QK whet
,
= 0 65
.
× 1.643
= 1.068 KNIM

Load [✗ < 30:/ non accessible

roof except for
MSEH 1991-1-1 Ii) Imposed
-

Mt
2020 Manta hence I repair ] qk = 0.25kW/ .

QK , roof =
0.25×1.643
= 0.411 KNIM

EH 1991 Hiii ) Imposed

-

load ,
slab [ roof
= 2.0 1-Ntm
]
table 6.2 1.643
QK slab
,
= 2.0 ✗

= 3.286 KNIM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

125241252€
Assuming roofing are designed
as slab .

i.

( included truss roof covering purlin)

,
,

two
way slab
425%-0
:

¥ 1.84
= =
< 2

^
Tf ft
"

Titty / 2500
✗ =/ -25m

s >
4596

Permenontloac :

1) Gk ,
roof =
0.014×1.25

= 0.018 kN /m

Ii) Gk purlin
,
=

3Y%9
= 0.031 kN 1m

Iii) Gk trusses =
0.3×1.25
,

=
0.375 kN / m

IV) GK , beam = 2510.225J (0-3)

= 1.688 KNIM
 Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

V) GK finishes
,
=
154.25)

= 1.875 KNIM

Vi
) Gk ,
Slab =
2510.15)( 1.25)
= 4.688 KNIM

: since it is roof floor , therefore no self -

weight

of brick wall .

Variableload
MS 1553.2002 1) Wind Load [ minimum design : 0.65kW/m2 )

QK whet ,
= 0 65
.
✗ f. 25
= 0.813 KNIM

Load [✗ < 30:/ non accessible

roof except for
MSEH 1991-1-1 Ii) Imposed
-

Mt
2020 Manta hence I repair ] qk = 0.25kW/ .

QK , roof =
0.25×1.25
= 0.313 KNIM

EH 1991 Hiii / Imposed

-

load ,
slab [ roof
= 2.0 1-Ntm
]
table 6.2 1-25
QK slab
,
= 2.0 ×

= 2.5 KNIM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

BeamkB4l_
-12-465+6.161)
EGK =
210.023+0.0311-0.493
+ 1-688

=
20.034 KNIM

IQK = 210-8131-0.3131-2.5)
= 7.252kW /m

ENMGO action nd -1.354kt I-501k

-

Design ,

Egn 6.106 -11.517.252)

= f. 35120.034)

= 37.92 KNIM

37.92kW /m

ttttt.tt 2
M
M
T 3.40m T
V V

V =
37.943.40) µ
=
hÉ
13794¥45
a-
=

=
64.46kW

= 36.53 KNM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

BeamRB6,RB24_(Secondary beam)
1-
125 -1 1-875+4.688 -10.018
{ Gk =
2.813 -1 1 .

0.031 t 0.375 + 1.688

= 12.613 KNIM

{ QK =
0.488+0-188+1.5 1- 0.8131-0.313-1

2.5
= 5.802k Nlm

nd = 1<35 (12.6131+1.515.802)
Designation ,

= 25.731 kN /m

M
25.731 KNIM

4¥E¥
"

✓
✓

✓ =

25731212.50£
=
32.16kW

M -
-

Y÷
=

1257,3121125€
= 13.4 KNM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

B-eamfhBHQRB3.BE
Gk =
1.1251-2.8131-2.465-1
0.018-10.031 +
6.161

1-688
+ 1.875 +

4. 688 +

= 20.864 KNIM

{ QK =
2. 176+4.765-13.626
=
10.567 KNIM

Action, nd 1.35 (20.8641-11.540.567)

Design
=

=
44.02 KNIM

32-16 kN
Point load from RB 6 121324
=

32.16 kN

/
44.02kW /m

mftttvttt.IM
T 3.286m T
V v

v = 44.043.286) -132.16
a-
= 88.4 kN

M=Y¥ ¥ +

144.021,123.28b€ (3116%3186)--52.
+ 8 2µm
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

BeamRB40-IGK.ie210 .
0105-10.031 -10.225+1-125+2.813)

+ 1.688

= 10.097 KNIM

EQK = 2 (0.4881-0.188-11.5)
=
4.352 KNIM

Action 1. 35110.097) -11-514.3527

Design nd =

=
20.16 kN 1m

M 20.16kW/m

¥É¥¥
"

v V

V =

(20.16*2.5)
= 25.2 kN

M=Y÷
=

(20lb¥
= 10.5 KNM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Member stiffness

2- 2 axis

I 3.286m 3.286m¢
/ 144336
144317 3. 15m
Kool
-

Kun .

¥ -1¥ - =

";¥¥ñ
= 4.21×10-4

KRBA =
1421336 =

II =
1b¥ (E)
=o÷÷÷× :
= 0.77 ✗ 10-4
-4
Ek =
[ 2 (0.7-7)+4.21 ] ✗ to

= 5.75×10-4

Distribution Factor ,

* of column =E÷=%?¥%¥_
= 0.732
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Column Moment 142-214-7

=
0.7345282-52.827
= OKNM
= KNM

y y
-
axis

3.40m 2.50m
1 ,
y 1121340
KRB 41
3.15m

f- Kool

Kool -

- =
,b¥="ii¥É,É
=/ -33×10-4
1421341 =
¥ 4¥ (E)
=

"¥÷¥-×±
= 0.74×10-4

1421340 =
⇐ =
HE (E)
=w¥¥ ✗ ±

= 1.01×10-4
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

IK =
(1.33 +
0.741-1.01) ✗ 10-4
-4
= 3 08 .
✗ to

DF of column
=E÷ ;?¥¥→ =

= 0.432

36.53 -10.5 ) My y cus)

-

Column Moment =
0.4321
=/ 1.24kNm
= 11.24 KNM
RFLU s)
64.46 -12132.167+488.4)
-1
-

Roof ,NE¢
=
U.s
MEd -330.78kW
.
-

25-2

= 330.78kW

Roof U.S. M =
Moot = Mma ✗ (Maz My y )
,
-

= 11.24 KNM

10,2=0.51 =
a)
=
0.513.15-0.31 TÉ¥¥D( i +
op
= 1- 43m
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

loif-o.5lk-¥¥¥a÷¥
l-o.ly#)(1-FIs-ka)=o.so
.

=
1.43m
RFIU.SI
Pout t.st.ME.a= Mcol + N¥÷ ME/ =/2.42kNm

3 0.tY.431-12.42KNMLoadingAna.ly#
= 11.24 1-

First flour
2

3286
↳y
' >
n

1=1347
3400 1=515
pst
V FBN 1=1342
n

/
f- 1330

2500 1=53 µzq

Sl S2
Fsu
1=1346
"

¢ 1500
>
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

1=57 & FS 15
-

¥× 3342¥ way slab

: two
=
=
1.03 C2

Permanent Load :

1) GK beam ,
=
25 (0.22576-3)

=
1-688 KNIM

Ñ) GK slab
,
=
23-(0-1534.643)
= 6.161 KNIM

Iii ) Gk finishes =
1.54.643 )
,

=
2.465 KNIM

) GK
IV
,
wall = 2.6 (4.15-0-3)
1m
=
10.01 kN

Variable Load
:

) QK
i slab = 20 (1-643)
,

= 3.286 KNIM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

¥¥¥÷
"

two way slab

-

1.838 C2
-
.
=

Permanent Load :

1) GK beam
,
=
25 (0.22510-3)

=
1-688 KNIM

Ñ) GK slab
,
=
23-(0.15×1.25)
= 4.688 Ktm

Iii ) Gk finishes =
1.5 ( 1.25 )
,

=
1.875 KNIM

) Gk
IV
,
wall = 2.6 (3.15-0-3)
= 7.41 kN 1m

Variable Load
:

) QK
i slab = 20 (1-25)
,

= 2.50 KNIM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Fairplay
slab
¥_ 2%÷
i. two
= = 1.6722 way

Permanent Load :

1) GK beam,
=
25 (0.22536-3)

=
1-688 KNIM

Ñ) GK slab
,
=
23-(0.15×0.75)
= 2.813 Ktm

Iii ) Gk finishes =
1.5 (0.1-5)
,

= 1-125 KNIM

IM GK ,
wall = 2.6 (3.15-0-3)
= 7-41 kN 1m

Variable Load
:

) QK
i stair -2.5
-

(0.7-5)
,

= 1.875 KNIM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

BeamFB47_
191<=216-161+2-465) -17-41+1.688

= 26.35 KNIM

{ QK =
213.286 )
=
6.572 KNIM

Design Action nd ,
= 1.33-(26.3511-1.516.572)

=
45.43 kN / m

m 45.43kWh
trtttttlutt am

T 3.40m T
V V

v
-45.4321340£ M=W¥
-

45.43/3-405 =

= 77.23kW I
= 43.76 KNM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Beam 1=139 & 17330 Csecondavybeam)

EGk= 4.688 -11.875+2813+1.125-1
1.6881-7.41
=
19.6 KNIM

{ QK =
2.51-1.875
= 4.375 KNIM

nd =L -35119.6 ) -11.514375)
Design action ,

- 33.02 KNIM

m
33.02 KNIM

trtttttlutt am

T 2.50 M T
V V
'

✓ =

330,42-50
) m=
(33-0,4-2.50)
41.28kW = 17.2 KNM
=
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

beamt-B20-FBLZ-IEGK-8.to
26+6.563 -13.938 -11.688
-1

7.41
=
28.23 KNIM

{ QK = 3.286 -12.51-1.875

= 7-661 KNIM

Design action , nd
=
1-33-(28.237-11.517.661)
= 49-6 KMM
17330=41.28 kN
Point Load from FBS &

41.28kW
M

flutter It f 49.6 KNIM

It 2m
T 3.286 M T
V V

v
-49.613.18261-1-41.18
-

µ
-141%2815+(41.28*186)
=
102.13 kN
=
61.59 KNM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Beamfpitb
EGk=2( 3.9381+1.688-17.41
= 16.97kWh
LAK -211.875)
=3 .75kN1m

Design action ,nd -1.35/16.97-1-11.513.75)

-28.531ohm
'

M 28.53 KNIM

trtttttlutt am

T 2.5m T
V V

✓ =

28.532125£ M
-28.5%2--55
-

= 35.66kW =/ 4. 86kNm
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Memberstittness
2- 2 axis

3.1%1401
13.286m
3.286m
,
n t
KFBZO 3.15m KFBYZ

Kai -_b¥=T¥¥¥%÷ ,

= 4.21×10-4
14--1320--14-4342=41-(1-2)
=

"¥,÷÷,× :
=
0.77×10-4
Ek
-

[210.771+214.211]×10-4
= 9.96×10-4
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

DF of column
=

kg÷
"

= 4.21-a0
9.96×10-4
=
0.423

0.423/61.59-61.59) Mz-21
Column Moment =

t.si/U.s-)--OkNm
OKNM
(
=

y-ya
,

3.15m Kcol
←
2.50m
13.40mn t
,

KFBFT 14=1346
gym

Koi -_b¥=_"¥%¥÷,
=
1.33×10-4
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

14=1347--4%(1-2)
=i÷÷:÷×±
=
0.77×10-4
144346
4¥ (E)
=

=L
"Y¥?÷ ✗ ±

=
1.01×10-4
EK -124.33 )
-

+ 0.77 -11-011×10-4
= 4.44×10-4
PF of column
=

É¥
=
1. 33×10-4
4.44×10--4
=
0.3
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Column moment -0.3 (43.76-14.86) My -

y
⇐ s / U.s ) .

=
f. ft KNM =
8.671dm

Gk column
,
= 1.3510-225/(0-4) (3.15×25)
=
9.57 kN
F. F. (t.SI
First floor -1.5 NED = 330.7-8 + 9.57
Ned 340 .HN
. -

= 340.35kW

340.35-177.231-35.66 F. F. Last
First floor U.s -

Ned =

+ 21102.13 ) Ned -657 .HN

-

= 657.3kW

Mcd =
Mmax ( Miz My ,
-

g)
=
8.67kW m

loip-o.se#!4s+--o.E+T---
)¥";¥¥*H+¥f¥¥÷
0.513.15-0.3

= 1- 43m
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

lovvr-o.se#t!y-F-o!FkT---
)¥"¥¥*H+¥¥
0.513.15-0.3
=
1.43m
Ffcts )
8.671-344%(0-143)=9.87
.

Med .es =
KNM 9.874mm
MEd
.

FFCU.si
Med .us 8.67 + = 11-02 KNM Mean

.cn/cNmLoadingAnalysrs-
-_
.

Ground floor 2

3286
↳y
' >
n

3400
GS8 GBH GSI}
v
GBH 61344
r

/
"

2500 653 459 4512 GSE

4139 16,48
GBH
✓

(F) 1500
>
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

958£13
¥× 3342¥ way slab
: two
=
=
1.03 C2

Permanent Load :

1) GK beam ,
=
25 (0.22510-3)

=
1-688 KNIM

Ñ) GK slab
,
=
23-(0-1534.643)
= 6.161 Ktm

Iii ) Gk finishes =
1.54.643 )
,

=
2.465 KNIM

) GK
IV
,
wall = 2.6 (3.15-0-3)
= 7.41 kN 1m

Variable Load
:

) QK
i slab = 20 (1-643)
,

= 3.286 kN 1m
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

:÷÷÷→
two way slab
-

1.838 C2
-
.
=

Permanent Load :

1) GK beam
,
=
25 (0.22536-3)

=
1-688 KNIM

Ñ) GK slab
,
=
23-(0.15×1.25)
= 4.688 Ktm

Iii ) Gk finishes =
1.5 ( 1.25 )
,

=
1.875 KNIM

) GK
IV
,
wall = 2.6 (3.15-0-3)
= 7.41 KNIM

Variable Load
:

) QK
i slab = 20 (1-25)
,

= 2.50 KNIM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

É
slab
¥_ 2%÷
i. two
= = 1.6712 way

Permanent Load :

1) GK beam,
=
25 (0.22510-3)

=
1-688 KNIM

Ñ) GK slab
,
=
23-(0.15×0.75)
= 2.813 Ktm

Iii ) Gk finishes =
1.5 (0.1-5)
,

= 1-125 KNIM

IM GK ,
wall = 2.6 (3.15-0-3)
= 7-41 kN 1m

Variable Load
:

) QK
i slab -2-0
-

(0.7-5)
,

= 1.50 KNIM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

BeamGB49_
I -688 -17-41
{ Gk = 218.626) -1
= 26.35 KNIM

EQK = 2 ( 3.286)
= 6.5724N / M

nd 1.35 (26.3571-1.516.572)
Design
=
action ,

= 45 43 KNIM
.

m 45.43 KNIM
Glut I t.tt It am

T 3.40m T
V V

v
-45.431340£
-

M =

W¥
= 77.23kW
=

45-4,3*-405
= 43.76 KNM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Beam 4139 & 91331 ( secondary beam )

EGK =
4.688 -11.875+2813+1.125-1
1.6881-7.41
=
19.6 KNIM
Elek =
25+1-5

=
4.0 kN 1m

Design action , nd = 1. 3549.6 ) -11.514.0 )

= 32.46 KNIM

32.46 KNIM
m

trtttttlutt am

T 2.50 m T
V V

V =

32.4%2-507 M=
132.46/{2-50}
= 40.58kW = 16.91 KNM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Beam GBH & GB 44

84k = 8.626+6.5631-3.938 -11.688-1

7.41
=
28.23 KNIM

86k = 1.5 1- 2.5 1- 3.286

= 7-286 kN 1m

Action nd 1.35-(28.237+1.517.286)
Design
=

=
49.04 KNIM
40.58kW
Point load from 4139 & GBH =

40.58 kN

flutter dat I
/ 49.041ohm
am

T 3.286 m T
V V

49.04/3.28261+40.58-14=49.0413^2865+40.58*286
)
✓=
I

= 60.8 KNM
=
100.86 kN
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

teamc
EGk=2( 3.9381+1.688-17.41
= 16.97kWh
LAK -211.51
-

=
3.00 KNIM

Design action , nd -135116.97-1-11-513)

= 27.41 KNIM

m
27.41 KNIM

trttttdlutt am

T 2.50m T
V V
"

V
-27.2111-2.57
M :(
274¥25
= 34.26kW = 14.28 KNM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

memberst nes z-zaxis-3.FM ←

Kcol

3.286m 3.286m
y ,
n t
KGB21 0 -9m KGB 44

Kool ,up=b¥u=YEY¥¥ ,
= 4-21×10-4

aol.am -1b¥
-
=
Y!% =
1-33×10-4

KGB21 = KGB44 =
4%-11-2)
=

"¥;:÷,× :
=
0.77×10-4
10-4
8k =

[210.771+4.411-1.33] ✗

= 7.28×10-4
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

kg
P
coliup
"

DF =
pt-al.am =

1.33×10-4
4.21-1/10-4
=

= 7.28×-10-4
7. 28×10-4

=
0.578 = 0-183

Matts)
Column Moment , -4 =
0.578/60.8-60.8 ) =
OKNM
=
OKNM
Mallu S )
(60.8-60.8)
-

0,183
Column Moment ,
us =

= OKNM
= OKNM

y-ya
,

3.15m Kcol
←
3.40m 2.50m
1 ,
n t
KGB49 0 -9M KGB48

kcotup-iz-70.LY??f?f-.s,
bh}

=
1.33×10-4
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

koi.am
1¥ "¥;?÷
l
-
= -

= 5.79×10-4

14=1347 =

b¥z ,
(E)

=i÷÷: ✗ ±
-4
=
0.77 ✗ to

144346
4¥ (1-2)
=

10
.Y¥?÷
=

✗ ±

=
1.01 ✗ 10-4

-4
E K =/
1 33 +
.
0.77 1- I -01+5.79 ] ✗ to
= 8.90×10-4
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

PF 61 , up
=

É¥uP
=

:÷i÷ .

=
0.149

DF cot ,
down =

k%a
=÷÷::→
= 0.651

Column moment , -4s = 0.149 (43.1-6-14.28) My-ylt.si

4.39kW m
.

= 4.39 KNM
MY YIU H
(43.1-6-14.28)
-
-

Column moment U.S

=
0.651
l9kNm
.

,
=/9.

= 19.19 KNM
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

GF (t.SI , Ned =
657.3+9.57 GT-t.si
NED -666.87kW
666.87kW
-

GFC " s ?
GF( U.S )
-

,
Ned =
666,87+77.23-1
NED -980.08kW
2400-867+34,26
=
980.08kW
Gk / stump =
1.35125)( 0.225/(0.4%-9)

= 2.73kW
NED stump
NED stump hits ) = 980.08-12.73 ,

982.81kW
.

,
=

= 982.81 kN

Mcol = Mmax ( Maz , My y) -

= 19.19 KNM

lolt.si/--o.s-(Hs--o.D--i:-::;;;-:I.I)
=
1.43m

locus ) .
-

-
o.s-co.at#:::+::Yg-:I.I)
= 0.45m
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

6 6-8tf .tl#GFC"°%%°
e.s)MEd=2.38kNm=2.38kNmG.FCus
Med -1.5=0
,
+

)
Megas .
__
19.19-1
Med

.si#Nm--22.69kNmSummary-

|
" °" " " "" "" """

RFUS -

330.78 12.42

FF -6s .

340.35 9.87

FFU.si 6573 11.02

Gftis .
666.87 2.38

GF us .
980.08 22.69

stump -1s .
982.81 0
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Detail
Loading
SFD BMD_
33078 12.42
F-
RF

315

657.3 "
?
l
✗
GFFF
- -
- - -

jiwjg
-
- - - -

g.

3.15

?? !GF
2169
980.08
×
-
- -

0.9

982.81 0
✓
Stump
 PART 2:
HAND CALCULATION FOR THE SIZE ESTIMATION OF A PAD FOOTINGS FULFILLING
THE SERVICEABILITY REQUIREMENTS
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Parl-2isizeestrmatnnotpadfoutingdesig.in
Column : P4

Specification
-

size 225mm ✗ 400mm

Column
=

900mm
Stump height
=

'
fck 25N 1mm
superstructure
:

Characteristic strength of ,
'

fck 30h11min
strength of substructure
:
.

characteristic
strength of of bar ifykofyw
=
500N / mm2
characteristic
zoo kN/m2
bearing capacity
:
Soil
life 50 years
Design
:

✗ c3
Exposure class
:

: 20mm
Size of aggregate
Rbo fire resistance
of bar
=
12mm
Diameter

"°Mha/co#
main
= 12mm
12mm
Ecz Cmm , b =
¢ main
=

table 4.2 54 )
Cminidur = 25mm ( structural
table NA3
ce ☐ Eder = 10mm
4.4.1.3
ce 10 =
35 < 40mm
Chom = 25 +
4.4.1.112)
Cl
4.4.1.314)
Cnomimin ( cast against prepared ground)
=
40mm
i. Use Cnom =
40mm
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Footing sizing

Ned = 982.81kW ( ULS loading)

service Load =

981¥ = 702.01kW

107 ( service load)

footing
=
Estimate s w
- .
.

=
10%(7-02.01)
=
70.2 kN

1- 70,2
702.01
825 Loading =

= 772.21 KN

SLS loading
Area of footing required
:

=I÷
=
3.861 m2

Estimate size =
%
=
1.96 m
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

ECZ Eq 6.5 Effective depth :

HEI
D=
Uo
VRD ,
Max

NED = 982.81 kN

VRD , Max
=
0.5 Vfcd = 0.5 [0.6 ( I -

fz¥) ) [ f¥, )
=
0.510.611-2%-7113%-1
2
= 5.28 N /mm

21225+400 )
Uo =
column perimeter =

= 1250 mm

di .÷÷ ÷::÷
-
-

=
148.9mm

h dtcnomttilbar
Estimated thickness =
,

1212
h = 148.9 + 40 +

= 194.9 mm

0 5m
Hence 2.0 m ✗
2.0
-

try m ✗
,

Pad footing .
 PART 3:
HAND CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGNING PAD FOOTINGS & DESIGN SPREADSHEET FOR
PAD FOOTINGS WITH SOIL BEARING CAPACITY = 200 kN/m2
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Check : Actual footing sw

0-5 × 25
2- 0 ✗ 2,0 ✗

= 50.0 kN 470.2kW . :O K!

• ; size 2-0 m ✗ 2.0m ✗ 0.5m pad footing

is suitable .

Part 3 :
Design pad footing
LoadngAnalysB_
982.81 kN
Loading Ned
=

VLS ,

ULS soil pressure , P !¥se¥£¥÷

=p area

= 982£
2.0 ✗2-0

= 245.7 KNIM

per length
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Maximum moment at column ,

M=WzI
225mm ✗ 400mm
Column
=
size

2m ✗ 2m ✗ 0.5
m
Pad footing size =

1000mm 1000mm 1000mm 1000mm

| || |
g g, , < g, >

| |
"° "
> ""
"
< > <

TT TT TTT TTT
245 7- KNIM
.
245 7- KNIM
.
 Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

SFD :

""" " "" "" ^ "" " " "" """ ^

< " " "

I 1 "f÷ If:|
"

196.56 kN •
218.06kW •

| | of 245.•7kN
,gµµ
| | f.
24597kW
us . #

BM
0.80m
0.80mg, 0.4m > 0.8875m

1<0.8 75
0.225m
my
y y
, < ><

y
111
78.621dm

111↳ g
.

122.85µm
" " ""

my µ ,zkNm
?⃝
?⃝?⃝
?⃝
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Nominal cover

main
= 12mm
12mm
EU Cmn , b =
¢ main
=

table 4.2 54 )
Cminidur = 25mm ( structural
table NA3

☐ Eder = 10mm
4.4.1.3
10 =
35 < 40mm
Chom = 25 +
4.4.1.112)

4.4.1.314)
Cnomimin ( cast against prepared ground)
=
40mm
i. Use Cnom =
40mm

Main reinforcement

0bar =
12mm
D= h Chom -0.50bar
depth
-

effective ,

= 500 -
40 -0.5112)

= 454mm

K=b¥fI
=
%%¥s¥÷
=
0.02 < 0.167

i.
Compression bar is not required .
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

2- -
d Cost ¥u ]
=d[ 0.5 -1
]
= 0.994 > 0.954

Hence Use 2 = 0.95ha

,

As

.mu?stf-kz- o.E?IoI?o.-sxys-y=5l5.76mmYm
EEZ :D fck% 0.30×302/3
fam 0.30
: =
= ✗

table 3.1
= 2.896

fort 28 days
compression strength
=

i. Mean
As 1mm
Cfctmffgkbd
-_

ECZ :C" As mm = 0.26

683.80mm /m
, '

9-2-1-1
= 0.26 (2-8%8-7400071454)
= 683.80 mm
'
/m > 0.0015b¢

0.0015 bd =
0.0015-(1000×454)
= 681 mm4m
As
0,04×1000×500 Max =

0.04 Ac
,
As , Max = =

20000mm4m
= 20000 mmym
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Propose :

Man ,
bar 1-112-150
Mam and secondary =
secondary
bar =

1-112-150
As prov = 754 mm -1m
,

Sheared
:O i
) vertical shear : critical at 1-04 from
6.2-2 column face

Design shear force :

Max shear force -

( soil pressure) (depth footing )

VED = 218.06-(245.7×0.454)
= 106.51 kN per m length

resistance
Design
[012 k( loop fate)% ]
bd
✓ = ,
Rd, c

k= I -1T¥ = I
+1T¥ ,

= I -
66 < 2.0
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

p , =A";÷ =

,Y¥
= 0 -0017

0.0015 < P, L b. 02

"
✓
Rd , c
=
[0.1211-66] (100×0.0017×30) 3) ✗

(1000×442)
= 154.81 KN

Minimum shear resistance

✓min =
[0.03518/2*2] bd
=
(0-03511.66)%(3071/21400031457)
= 186.77 kN
kN i. OK
✓Rd, c = 154.81 kN > VED =/ 06.51
2d
F) Punching shear at perimeter

from column face .

ECZ :a :

depth
Proposed
-

depth
=

Average
6.4.414 nominal cover
-

bar size
448mm
darg 500-40-12 =
=
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

2d =
21448) = 896mm

Column G & C2

C) =
225mm ,
Cz =
400mm

Control perimeter ,
n = 24 +
G) +21T (2d)
=
2 (225+400)+27/896)
= 6880 mm

Area within perimeter ,

✗ 2d ) 2/(2×24) -1
( G ✗ G) +214
+
A =

2
4- (2d)

4225×896) -12(400×896)
-1
=
(225×400) +

4- ( 89112
2

= 3.73 m

shear force :

Punching
✓Ed = 245.7 (2-02-3.73)

= 66.34 FN

Ved
"÷ =%;}¥¥→
=

= 0 .
02
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

resistance
Punching shear :

✓Rd =

(0-¥)k( loop kick ,

=(Y¥)(1.671400×0.00154×301×3
=
0.334
✓min = 0.035 k%fckk

=
0.035 ( 1.61-7%130/12
= 0.041
Ok
-

0.022
. .

✓Rd =
0 .
334 > VED =

resistance
iii) Maximum punching shear

at column perimeter
ECZ ✓ Rd / Max = 0 -5yd [0.64-1%-7] ,f¥
6,5
eqn &
.

Uo =
21Gt G) =2(225-1400)
egn 6.6N = 1250mm
✓Rd / Max =
0.54250×448)[0.64
-
3¥07 ]( ¥5)
= 2956.8 kN > VLS loading -
'

10K
=
982.81kW
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Cracking
EC : 4 500mm > 200mm
'

h
-

7. 3.3
quasi permanent
action :
under
-

steel stress

Gk -3 QK
permanent action
=

Quasi - to

for roof floor i

Loading
] ✗ 3¥ = 37.76kW
it (20.034+0.317.252) 17.94kW
0.315.802) ) ✗ 2¥ =

%) [ 12-613-1
iii) [ 20.864 to .3( 10.5671 ]
✗ 3.2¥ =
39.49kW
14.25 KN
[ 10.097 -1 0.3 ( 4.3521 ] ✗
=

IY

first floor
:
for
Loading
D [ 26.35 + 0.36.572) ) ✗ ¥ = 98.154N

2¥ 26.14kW
0.314.375) )
=

Ii) [ 19.6 + ✗

Iii) [28.23 + 0.317.6611]×3281=50.16 kN

ill [16.97 + 0.313.751] ✗ ¥ = 22 -62kW

3.15
Column S W
- .
= 25×17.225×0.4 ×

= 7.09 kN
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

Loading for ground floor

:

48.15kW
1) [26.35+0.316.5727] 3¥
=
✗

kN
Ii) [ 19.6 -1 0.3 ( 4.01 ) ) 2¥ 26.0 ✗
=

49.97kW
3.2¥
=
iii)
[28-23+0.317.2861] ✗

22.34 KN
ill [ 16.97 0.313.0) )
+ ✗
2.2-5 =

25 0.225 ✗ 0.4 × 3.15

Column SW
.
.
= ✗

= 7.09 KN

Stump = 25×0.225×0.4 ✗ 0.9

= 2.025kW

Strat Action
=
419.18kW

a- ¥÷×¥÷m×E÷::÷7
=

;÷×¥"×Y÷÷ 754 ,

= 126.85 Nimmi
Appendix B

Reference Calculation Output

For recommend design crack width
Ecz

table 7.2N = 0.3mm

Max bar diameter to control cracking

= 25mm > 12mm
i. OK

E" bar spacing

-250mm
Max allowable
-

table 7.3N
Actual max bar spacing =
spacing -210.54bar)

= 250-210.5×14
i. OK
= 238mm < 250mm

,
Detailing of Pad footing

Y
2000
H12-150-BB
SECTION Y-Y

400

H12-150-BT

2000
225

225
2000
H12-150-BT

X H12-150-BB X

500
Y

400

Scale : 1:30
500

H12-150-BT H12-150-BB
2000

SECTION X-X
ARAVINDA REDDY A/L THIAKARAJAN
SHIO ZIN-E 2006150
2004920
UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2023
UEMX 2363 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II GROUP ASSIGNMENT

Marking Rubric for Assignment

Part 1 Loading analysis for Column

Column (Hand calculation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for column loading analysis and design with correct
formulation and method with more than 6 errors.
Part 2 Hand calculation for the size
estimation
Footing or Pile cap (Size estimation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 1 error.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 3 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with 5 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap size estimation with correct
formulation and method with more than 7 errors.
Part 3 Hand calculations for designing
Footing or Pile cap (Hand calculation)
Excellent– 20 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with no error.
Good – 15 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 1 error.
Average – 10 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 3 errors.
Poor – 5 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with 5 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Perform hand calculation for footing or pile cap design with correct formulation and
method with more than 7 errors.
Footing or Pile cap (Spreadsheet)
Excellent– 20 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with no error.
Good – 15 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Create spreadsheet to design footing or pile cap with correct formulation and method
with more than 7 errors.
Layout drawing and detailing • Layout plans
• Footings or Pile caps
Excellent– 20 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with no error.
Good – 15 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 2 errors.
Average – 10 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 4 errors.
Poor – 5 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with 6 errors.
Very Poor – 1 % Able to provide correct layout drawing and detailing with more than 8 errors.

1
 PART 1:
HAND CALCULATIONS FOR LOADING ANALYSIS FOR COLUMN (F/4) FROM STUMP TO
ROOF LEVEL