TITLE PAGE

Topic 5
 Controversies and conflicting views in Philippine history

Learning Outcome:
 Demonstrate the ability to formulate arguments in favor or against a particular
issue using primary sources (Two Faces of the 1872 Cavite Mutiny)

Number of Weeks to be Taught:

 1

Background

The 12th of June of every year since 1898 is a very important event for all the
Filipinos. In this particular day, the entire Filipino nation as well as Filipino communities
all over the world gathers to celebrate the Philippines’ Independence Day. 1898 came
to be a very significant year for all of us— it is as equally important as 1896—the year
when the Philippine Revolution broke out owing to the Filipinos’ desire to be free from
the abuses of the Spanish colonial regime. But we should be reminded that another
year is as historic as the two—1872.

Two major events happened in 1872, first was the 1872 Cavite Mutiny and the
other was the martyrdom of the three martyr priests in the persons of Fathers Mariano
Gomes, Jose Burgos and Jacinto Zamora (GOMBURZA). However, not all of us knew
that there were different accounts in reference to the said event. All Filipinos must know
the different sides of the story—since this event led to another tragic yet meaningful part
of our history—the execution of GOMBURZA which in effect a major factor in the
awakening of nationalism among the Filipinos.
 GUIDE CARD

THE TWO FACES OF THE 1872 CAVITE MUTINY

by Chris Antonette Piedad-Pugay
September 5, 2012

1872 Cavite Mutiny: Spanish Perspective

A. Spanish Version: Planned Conspiracy

Jose Montero y Vidal, a prolific Spanish historian documented the event and
highlighted it as an attempt of the Indios to overthrow the Spanish government in the
Philippines. Meanwhile, Gov. Gen. Rafael Izquierdo’s official report magnified the event
and made use of it to implicate the native clergy, which was then active in the call for
secularization. The two accounts complimented and corroborated with one other, only
that the general’s report was more spiteful. Initially, both Montero and Izquierdo scored
out that the abolition of privileges enjoyed by the workers of Cavite arsenal such as non-
payment of tributes and exemption from force labor were the main reasons of the
“revolution” as how they called it, however, other causes were enumerated by them
including the Spanish Revolution which overthrew the secular throne, dirty propagandas
proliferated by unrestrained press, democratic, liberal and republican books and
pamphlets reaching the Philippines, and most importantly, the presence of the native
clergy who out of animosity against the Spanish friars, “conspired and supported” the
rebels and enemies of Spain. In particular, Izquierdo blamed the unruly Spanish Press
for “stockpiling” malicious propagandas grasped by the Filipinos. He reported to the
King of Spain that the “rebels” wanted to overthrow the Spanish government to install a
new “hari” in the likes of Fathers Burgos and Zamora. The general even added that the
native clergy enticed other participants by giving them charismatic assurance that their
fight will not fail because God is with them coupled with handsome promises of rewards
such as employment, wealth, and ranks in the army. Izquierdo, in his report lambasted
the Indios as gullible and possessed an innate propensity for stealing.

The two Spaniards deemed that the event of 1872 was planned earlier and was
thought of it as a big conspiracy among educated leaders, mestizos, abogadillos or
native lawyers, residents of Manila and Cavite and the native clergy. They insinuated
that the conspirators of Manila and Cavite planned to liquidate high-ranking Spanish
officers to be followed by the massacre of the friars. The alleged pre-concerted signal
among the conspirators of Manila and Cavite was the firing of rockets from the walls of
Intramuros.
 According to the accounts of the two, on 20 January 1872, the district of Sampaloc
celebrated the feast of the Virgin of Loreto, unfortunately participants to the feast
celebrated the occasion with the usual fireworks displays. Allegedly, those in Cavite
mistook the fireworks as the sign for the attack, and just like what was agreed upon, the
200-men contingent headed by Sergeant Lamadrid launched an attack targeting
Spanish officers at sight and seized the arsenal.

When the news reached the iron-fisted Gov. Izquierdo, he readily ordered the
reinforcement of the Spanish forces in Cavite to quell the revolt. The “revolution” was
easily crushed when the expected reinforcement from Manila did not come ashore.
Major instigators, including Sergeant Lamadrid were killed in the skirmish, while the
GOMBURZA were tried by a court-martial and were sentenced to die by strangulation.
Patriots like Joaquin Pardo de Tavera, Antonio Ma. Regidor, Jose and Pio Basa and
other abogadillos were suspended by the Audiencia (High Court) from the practice of
law. Gov. Izquierdo dissolved the native regiments of artillery and ordered the creation
of artillery force to be composed exclusively of the Peninsulares.

On 17 February 1872 in an attempt of the Spanish government and Frailocracia to

instill fear among the Filipinos so that they may never commit such daring act again, the
GOMBURZA were executed. This event was tragic but served as one of the moving
forces that shaped Filipino nationalism.

B. A Response to Injustice: The Filipino Version of the Incident

Dr. Trinidad Herminigildo Pardo de Tavera, a Filipino scholar and researcher, wrote
the Filipino version of the bloody incident in Cavite. In his point of view, the incident was
a mere mutiny by the native Filipino soldiers and laborers of the Cavite arsenal who
turned out to be dissatisfied with the abolition of their privileges. Indirectly, Tavera
blamed Gov. Izquierdo’s cold-blooded policies such as the abolition of privileges of the
workers and native army members of the arsenal and the prohibition of the founding of
schools of arts and trades for the Filipinos, which the general believed as a cover-up for
the organization of a political club.

On 20 January 1872, about 200 men comprise of soldiers, laborers of the arsenal,
and residents of Cavite headed by Sergeant Lamadrid rose in arms and assassinated
the commanding officer and Spanish officers in sight. The insurgents were expecting
support from the bulk of the army unfortunately, that didn’t happen. The news about the
mutiny reached authorities in Manila and Gen. Izquierdo immediately ordered the
reinforcement of Spanish troops in Cavite. After two days, the mutiny was officially
declared subdued.
 Tavera believed that the Spanish friars and Izquierdo used the Cavite Mutiny as a
powerful lever by magnifying it as full-blown conspiracy involving not only the native
army but also included residents of Cavite and Manila, and more importantly the native
clergy to overthrow the Spanish government in the Philippines. It is noteworthy that
during the time, the Central Government in Madrid announced its intention to deprive
the friars of all the powers of intervention in matters of civil government and the direction
and management of educational institutions. This turnout of events was believed by
Tavera, prompted the friars to do something drastic in their dire desire to maintain
power in the Philippines.

Meanwhile, in the intention of installing reforms, the Central Government of Spain

welcomed an educational decree authored by Segismundo Moret promoted the fusion
of sectarian schools run by the friars into a school called Philippine Institute. The
Decree proposed to improve the standard of education in the Philippines by requiring
teaching positions in such schools to be filled by competitive examinations. This
improvement was warmly received by most Filipinos in spite of the native clergy’s zest
for secularization.

The friars, fearing that their influence in the Philippines would be a thing of the past,
took advantage of the incident and presented it to the Spanish Government as a vast
conspiracy organized throughout the archipelago with the object of destroying Spanish
sovereignty. Tavera sadly confirmed that the Madrid Government came to believe that
the scheme was true without any attempt to investigate the real facts or extent of the
alleged “revolution” reported by Izquierdo and the friars.

Convicted educated men who participated in the mutiny were sentenced life
imprisonment while members of the native clergy headed by the GOMBURZA were
tried and executed by garrote. This episode leads to the awakening of nationalism and
eventually to the outbreak of Philippine Revolution of 1896. The French writer Edmond
Plauchut’s account complimented Tavera’s account by confirming that the event
happened due to discontentment of the arsenal workers and soldiers in Cavite fort. The
Frenchman, however, dwelt more on the execution of the three martyr priests which he
actually witnessed.

Unraveling the Truth

Considering the four accounts of the 1872 Mutiny, there were some basic facts that
remained to be unvarying:
1. There was dissatisfaction among the workers of the arsenal as well as the
members of the native army after their privileges were drawn back by Gen.
Izquierdo;
 2. Gen. Izquierdo introduced rigid and strict policies that made the Filipinos move
and turn away from Spanish government out of disgust;
3. The Central Government failed to conduct an investigation on what truly
transpired but relied on reports of Izquierdo and the friars and the opinion of the
public;
4. The happy days of the friars were already numbered in 1872 when the Central
Government in Spain decided to deprive them of the power to intervene in
government affairs as well as in the direction and management of schools
prompting them to commit frantic moves to extend their stay and power;
5. The Filipino clergy members actively participated in the secularization movement
in order to allow Filipino priests to take hold of the parishes in the country
making them prey to the rage of the friars;
6. Filipinos during the time were active participants, and responded to what they
deemed as injustices; and lastly
7. The execution of GOMBURZA was a blunder on the part of the Spanish
government, for the action severed the ill-feelings of the Filipinos and the event
inspired Filipino patriots to call for reforms and eventually independence. There
may be different versions of the event, but one thing is certain, the 1872 Cavite
Mutiny paved way for a momentous 1898.

The road to independence was rough and tough to toddle, many patriots named
and unnamed shed their bloods to attain reforms and achieve independence. 12 June
1898 may be a glorious event for us, but we should not forget that before we came
across to victory, our forefathers suffered enough. As we enjoy our freedom, may we
be more historically aware of our past to have a better future ahead of us. And just like
what Elias said in Noli me Tangere, may we “not forget those who fell during the night.”
 LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Activity 1

Direction: Compare and contrast the Spanish version of 1872 Cavite Mutiny with that of
Filipino version.

Subjects compared Cite reasons for comparison

Spanish Version of 1872 Cavite Mutiny

Evidence 1 Evidence 2

Filipino Version of 1872 Cavite Mutiny

Evidence 1 Evidence 2
Activity 2

Direction: Find a portrait or a picture of rebellion in the past. Paste it in the box.
Describe the picture according to how it is designed.

______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________

Activity 3

Direction: Answer the discussion questions below

1. What are the two reasons cited by Tavera as the cause of the mutiny?
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________

2. What drove or motivated the friars and Gov. Izquierdo to create a radical move of
executing Filipino priests in order to stay in power?
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________

3. What was the way the GOMBURZA execution carried out?

___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
 4. What political idealism had the martyrdom of GOMBURZA imbued to the Filipino
people at the time?
__________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________

5. Which do you think was the reason for the death of GOMBURZA, love for one’s
country or love for one’s faith? Explain your answer.
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

6. Which is nobler, to die for one’s country or to die for one’s faith? Why?
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________

ASSESSMENT

Direction: Write the answer to each question before the number.

_______1. Who was the Spanish governor general responsible for the execution of
GOMBURZA?

_______2. What was the main cause for the execution of GOMBURZA according to
Spanish Version?

_______3. When was the Cavite Mutiny carried out?

_______4. When was the martyrdom of GOMBURZA happened?

________5. For Dr. T.H. Pardo de Tavera, the bloody event in Cavite was only a _____?
 ENRICHMENT

Direction: Fill-out the spaces on the box with the list of rebellion/mutiny/coup d’etat that
you knew in the annals of Philippine history.

Name of Rebellion Leader/s Duration (Date) Reasons for the

Rebellion
1.

2.

3.

Direction: Give a list of countries that penalizes capital punishment. Give the reason or
the violation committed for the death penalty. State the ways through which
such death execution has been carried out.

Countries Reasons/Causes/Violations Manner of execution

for Death Penalty

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.
Direction: Answer the following questions.

1. Give at least three Filipino martyrs other than GOMBURZA.

1.

2.

3.

2. Are you in favor of rebellion? Why?

Are you in favor of death penalty as punishment for rebellion? Why?

______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
___________________________________

3. What is the position of the United Nations about the issue of death penalty as
policy of sovereign countries?

______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
_________________________

4. Read the Phil. Constitution. Cite the article and the Section that tells about the
protection of life.

______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
_______________________________________
 REFERENCES

Galicia, Reynaldo, Palencia, Marjueve, and Solmerano, Ernesto Thaddeus. Readings in

Philippine History. Sampaloc, Manila: Fastbooks Educational Supply, Inc., 2018.

http://nhcp.gov.ph/the-two-faces-of-the-1872-cavite-mutiny/

http://www.philippinestudies.net/ojs/index.php/ps/article/view/1992