SAINT JOSEPH COLLEGE, MAASIN, LEYTE

Tunga – Tunga, Maasin City, So. Leyte

Senior High School Department
SY: 2022 - 2023

PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1

Rubric in Grading the Parts of the Research Proposal

Parts of the Exemplary Proficient Emerging Not Evident

Research Paper
(30-28 points) (27-24 points) (23 - 20 points) (19 points and
below)
CHAPTER I

Rationale / An extremely well- A clear An adequate The

Introduction defined, rationale/introducti rationale/introducti rationale/introduction
comprehensive, on is provided. on is provided. is not well provided.
and persuasive
rationale/introducti
on is provided. a. Shows that a. Shows that a. Students need to
students have a students have an show an average
a. Shows
good average understanding of the
students'
understanding of understanding of research problem.
understanding of
the research the research
the research b. It needs a lot of
problem. problem.
problem. information for a
b. Some needed b. One or two good introduction.
b. Gives
information is components of a
appropriate c. Objectives are not
missing. good introduction
information on the clearly presented.
are missing.
variables, c. The aims and
settings, reasons/ objectives d. Many sources are
are c. Objectives are
background, and presented. absent. It uses
presented.
previous studies inappropriate format
related to the d. In-text citations d. Most cited for in-text citation
current research. are presented with sources present.
e. Paper lacks well-
few errors. Errors in an in-text
c. The aims or organized
citation are
objectives are e. Most paragraphs present.
paragraphs, and
clearly presented. are well-organized, many grammatical
and several e. Paper lacks well- errors, formatting
d. In-text citations grammatical errors, organized errors, typos, and
are properly
 presented. formatting errors, paragraphs, and misspellings are
typos, and several present.
e. Paragraphs are
misspellings are grammatical errors,
well organized,
present. formatting errors,
with few
typos, and
grammatical
misspellings are
errors, formatting
present.
errors, typos, and
misspellings.

Theoretical and The output The output The output The output needs to
Conceptual establishes an establishes a establishes a basic establish an
Framework (for advanced sound and theoretical appropriate
Quantitative only) theoretical proficient background and theoretical
background with theoretical requires significant background, and cite
little or no background with revision. The appropriately, which
revision, works major or moderate current theories are requires significant
Atheoretical with multiple revision. It details connected but revision.
Stance(for demonstrably theories/models provide a weak The theoretical
Qualitative only) relevant theories and discusses their framework for the framework needs to
or models, uses impact on the research. This be included, clarified
theories/models to present study. The results in little to no and understood. It
generate current discussion of their needs to be
questions and theories/models research's impact connected to the
support the are connected and on existing literature review or
variables, and provide a clear theories. research question.
addresses how framework for the There needs to be
the proponents' research variables. more discussion of
works will the impact of theory
contribute to the on the research.
present study. .

The conceptual The conceptual The conceptual

The conceptual
framework is framework is fairly framework is
framework must be
appropriately illustrated and illustrated and
appropriately
illustrated and described in line described in line
illustrated and
described in line with the research with the research
described in line with
with the research questions and questions the and research
questions and research design. design. Moreover,
questions and
design. Moreover, Moreover, it almost there are errors
design. Instead, it
it is clearly follows the correct when it comes to
presents a vague
presented in the format. the format.and confusing
correct format. description of the
framework.
The atheoretical The atheoretical The atheoretical The atheoretical
stance is well- stance needs stance needs more stance is stated
written. minimal revision. revision. incorrectly..
Statement of the The problem The problem The problem The problem
Problem statement and statement and statement and statement and
research research questions research questions research questions
Statement of questions are are articulated, but are not clearly are poorly described
Hypothesis (for clearly articulated, not detailed or articulated, and are not well
Quantitative Only) detailed, and testable. detailed, or provided.
testable. testable.

The hypothesis is The hypothesis The hypothesis The hypothesis is

well-written. needs minimal needs more stated incorrectly.
revision. revision.

Scope and It includes the It lacks one It lacks two It lacks three or
Delimitation of the following: the component out of components out of more components
Study objective of the the list of the list of out of the list of
study, the major inclusions. inclusions. inclusions.
variables,
respondents,
locale, time frame,
and research
instrument.
Significance of the It clearly It fairly discusses It discusses the It lacks discussion of
Study discusses the the beneficiaries beneficiaries and the beneficiaries and
beneficiaries and and the benefits the benefits they the benefits they
the benefits they they gain from the gain from the study gain from the study.
gain from the study. It explains a in a small manner. It has no practical
study. It explains moderate practical It contains few importance. There is
the practical importance. There basic practical no arrangement for
importance. There is quite an importance. There the beneficiaries.
is an arrangement arrangement of the is no arrangement
of the beneficiaries. for the
beneficiaries from beneficiaries.
the most benefited
to the least.

Definition of Terms It defines all It defines some It defines few It lacks important
important terms important terms important terms. terms. The included
operationally. operationally. terms are unrelated
and irrelevant.
CHAPTER II The review is very The review is The review lacks
comprehensive relatively The review is comprehensive
Review of Related and describes comprehensive relatively coverage of relevant
Literature and relevant material. and describes the comprehensive material.
Studies (for The purpose of most relevant and describes The purpose of the
Quantitative Only) the study is clearly material. some relevant study is not clearly
described. Significant gaps material. described.
An excellent still exist. The purpose of the There is no
connection exists The purpose of the study is described, connection between
between the study is adequately but it is not as the material and the
 material reviewed described. clear. purpose of the
and the study's There is a good There is an attempt study.
objectives and attempt to connect to connect the Critical reviews are
variables. Critical the material material reviewed not included.
reviews are reviewed with the with the purpose of The literature and
included. purpose of the the study. Critical findings lack
The literature and study. Critical reviews are not relevance, quality,
findings from past reviews were included. and depth. In
studies are from included but could Limited literature addition, there are
relevant and have been done and findings from no citations of
quality resources better. quality resources or sources.
or materials. The literature and materials have
There is a proper findings from past limited relevance.
citation of studies are from Moreover, there
sources. somewhat relevant need to be more
and quality citations of
resources or sources.
materials. In
addition, there are
citations of
sources.
CHAPTER III The research The research The research The research design
design employed design employed is design employed is employed to support
Research is thoroughly adequately minimally research objectives
Methodology discussed relative discussed relative discussed relative is not discussed.
(Quantitative) to the research to the research to the research The sampling
objectives/ objectives. The objectives. The method, locale,
variables. The sampling method, sampling method, instrumentation, and
sampling method, locale, locale, research time frame
locale, instrumentation, instrumentation, are poorly identified.
instrumentation, and research time and research time It lacks description
and research time frame are frame are vaguely of the data
CHAPTER II frame are clearly identified. It identified. It gathering/collection
Research identified. substantially adequately procedure.
It thoroughly describes the data provides a Furthermore, it lacks
Methodology
provides a gathering/collection description of the appropriate data
(Qualitative) concise procedure. data analysis to address
Ethical description of the Furthermore, it gathering/collection the research
Consideration (for data gathering/ utilizes the procedure. objectives.
collection appropriate data Furthermore, it
Qualitative Only)
procedure. analysis to address utilizes less
Furthermore, it the research appropriate data
utilizes the most objectives. analysis to address
appropriate the research
statistical/data objectives.
analysis to
address the
research
objectives.
 The ethical The ethical The ethical The ethical
consideration is consideration consideration consideration is
well-written. needs minimal needs more written incorrectly.
revision. revision.

Research Title The title is clear, The title is clear , The title is clear, The title is unclear,
the variables and and the variables some variables and variables and
elements are well- and elements are elements need to elements are not
stated , and the well-stated. be better stated, stated , and the
number of words However, the and the number of number of words
is less than or number of words words exceeds 15. exceeds 15.
exactly 15. exceeds 15.
APA Citation The APA citation A good attempt An attempt has There are problems
Format/Style is excellent. The has been made to been made to deal exist with citations.
proposal is deal with citations. with citations. Many citations are
perfectly The proposal is Some citations are missing
formatted formatted missing. There is There is little or no
according to APA reasonably well some effort put into attempt to format the
formatting and contains a few formatting well. In proposal according
guidelines. There formatting errors. addition, some of to APA formatting
are no issues with In addition, a few the formatting guidelines.
the citations. things could be elements are
improved with the present.
citations.
Writing The ideas Almost all ideas Most ideas Many errors exist
(Accuracy, Clarity, presented in the presented in the presented in the within the proposal.
and Conciseness) proposal are proposal are proposal are It needs to be better
accurate. The accurate and accurate. The written and easier to
proposal is clearly clearly written. In proposal has understand. The
written and very addition, the writing problems with writing is not concise
easy to is generally clarity, and some and is irrelevant.
understand. The concise and portions could be
writing is relevant. clearer to
appropriately understand.
concise and However, the
always relevant. writing is
reasonably concise
and relevant.
Grammar & There are no There are a few There are some There are a lot of
Mechanics grammar, corrections in grammar, grammar,
(Grammar, punctuation, or grammar, punctuation, and punctuation, and
Punctuation, spelling errors. It punctuation, and spelling errors. In spelling errors. The
Spelling, Format) follows the spelling. addition, certain errors seriously
required format. It reasonably things could be interfere with the
The researchers follows the improved by readability of the
clearly reviewed required format. following the proposal. In addition,
the proposal The researchers required format. it does not follow the
 before reviewed the The researchers required format. The
submission. proposal before should have researchers should
submission. reviewed the have reviewed the
proposal before proposal before
submission. submission.

Research Instructor : Mr. Jayson E. Orais, LPT, MAEd