CompneuroFinalDiscussion 2019
CompneuroFinalDiscussion 2019
2019
Final discussion
Odelia Schwartz
1
From the NIH web site:
Committee report: Brain 2025: A Scientific Vision
(from 2014)
2
From the NIH web site:
Committee report: Brain 2025: A Scientific Vision
(from 2014)
3
From the NIH web site:
Committee report: Brain 2025: A Scientific Vision
(from 2014)
4
From the NIH web site:
Committee report: Brain 2025: A Scientific Vision
(from 2014)
5
From the NIH web site:
Committee report: Brain 2025: A Scientific Vision
(from 2014)
6
From the NIH web site:
Committee report: Brain 2025: A Scientific Vision
(from 2014)
9
From the NIH web site:
Committee report: Brain 2025: A Scientific Vision
(from 2014)
10
Lots of recent interest from industry
11
Google Brain
12
Computational neuroscience
14
Computational neuroscience
C O M M E N TA RY
F O C U S O N N E U R A L C O M P U TAT I O N A N D T H E O R Y
Theoretical approaches have long shaped neuroscience, but current needs for theory are elevated and prospects for advancement
are bright. Advances in measuring and manipulating neurons demand new models and analyses to guide interpretation. Advances
in theoretical neuroscience offer new insights into how signals evolve across areas and new approaches for connecting population
activity with behavior. These advances point to a global understanding of brain function based on a hybrid of diverse approaches.
Theoretical approaches have a long history complex data into forms that summarize the This approach differs critically from tradi-
of contributing to neuroscience research, but results in a more compact and understandable tional averaging in that neurons contribute in
never before has the need for them been so way. Third, using modeling to link the results to varying degrees, or even negatively (Fig. 1),
high nor the prospects for advancement so underlying mechanisms and overlying princi- to the extracted signal. Simple classifiers are
great. The explosion in technologies available ples. The perspectives and reviews in this issue becoming a standard tool for interpreting neu-
for measuring and manipulating neurons has primarily address the third, and some of the ral data10,11. More complex classifiers, such
created a call for analysis techniques that are second, stage, surveying new developments and as those with multiple processing layers, are
scalable to extremely large data sets, that take modeling-based insights in topics ranging from rapidly being developed in both neuroscience
and industry12. One example is the hierarchi-
15 Churchland, A.K. and Abbott, L.F. (2016)
into account the heterogeneity of neurons,
and that can predict and interpret the effects
understanding and interpreting network spik-
ing activity1–3, exploring visual processing4 and cal convolutional neural network (HCNN),
of complex manipulations of activity. The memory5, and studying the representation and which is based on ideas developed in stud-
growing importance of theory is also driven computation of probability6, to investigations ies of the visual system. As discussed in this
by developments in theoretical neuroscience of higher level cognition and mental illness7. issue, HCNNs can be used to interpret activ-
itself, advances that expand the reach of theo- In addition, major advances in the other stages ity at various stages along the primate visual
retical approaches and extend their ability to of analysis have driven the entire program to pathway during object recognition4.
offer insight into long-standing puzzles. In evolve considerably in recent years. Two such Second, new challenges for data analysis
Computational neuroscience
16
Fields evolving include …
17
Related research areas At UM
• Computational Neuroscience
• Neural Engineering and Brain machine Interfaces
• Machine learning
• Data science
• Large-scale fMRI
• Technology such as optogenetics
• Neuroscience / Biology
• Robotics
18
19