Diversification of Cropping Systems For
Diversification of Cropping Systems For
Authors’ contributions
This work was carried out in collaboration among all authors. Author CPK designed the study,
performed the statistical analysis, wrote the protocol and wrote the first draft of the manuscript.
Authors MG and GKR managed the analyses of the study. Authors KN, SHKS, AAQ, MA and KC
managed the literature searches. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Article Information
DOI: 10.9734/CJAST/2020/v39i2930957
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Orlando Manuel da Costa Gomes, Lisbon Accounting and Business School (ISCAL), Lisbon Polytechnic Institute,
Portugal.
Reviewers:
(1) I Nengah Muliarta, Mahendradatta University, Indonesia.
(2) S. E. Sarjiyanto, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia.
Complete Peer review History: http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/61475
ABSTRACT
A long-term field experiment was undertaken during the year 2019-20 (third year of the experiment)
at college farm, AICRP on Integrated Farming Systems unit, PJTSAU, Hyderabad to evaluate
productivity and profitability of cropping systems for different farming systems under irrigated
situation on a sandy loam soil of Southern Telangana Zone (STZ), Telangana. Among the ten
cropping systems evaluated, sweet corn – vegetable system (tomato) was found to be more
remunerative with B:C ratio 3.30 followed by okra – marigold – beetroot system with B:C ratio 3.0.
Among the ecological cropping systems for improving soil health, pigeonpea + greengram (1:7) –
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
sesame cropping system recorded higher BC ratio (2.02) compared to Bt cotton + green gram (1:3)
– groundnut cropping system (1.78). Out of the two systems evaluated to meet the household
nutritional security, pigeon pea + groundnut (1:7) – fingermillet system recorded higher BC ratio
(1.85) compared to pigeon pea + maize (1:3) – groundnut. Within the two fodder crops/cropping
systems, fodder maize – lucerne system resulted in higher B:C ratio (1.65).
Keywords: Cropping systems; rice grain equivalent yield (RGEY); system productivity and system
profitability.
52
Kumari et al.; CJAST, 39(29): 51-60, 2020; Article no.CJAST.61475
Rice equivalent yield (REY) was calculated as 82,798) compared to Bt cotton + Greengram (Rs.
follows: 88,804). However, Bt cotton and pigeonpea
yields were not influenced by different
-1
REY (kg ha ) = Economical yield of a crop intercropping systems. This might be due the fact
-1 -1
e.g. wheat (kg ha )x Price (Rs kg ) of same that after the harvest of inter crops, competition
-1
crop e.g. wheat/Price (Rs kg ) of rice reduced thereby water and nutrient availability
was not affected. Kumawat et al. [8] and Singh et
The economic analysis of the experiment was al. [9] reported the similar results with different
carried out by taking into consideration the intercropping systems. Out of the two systems
prevailing prices of inputs used and the outputs tested to meet the household nutritional security,
realized. The cost of cultivation of different crops both Pigeon pea + Maize (1:3) and Pigeon pea +
individually has been calculated. The yields of Groundnut (1:7) systems were on par with each
different crops in various cropping systems were other and recorded almost similar rice grain
-1
converted into gross returns in rupees. Net equivalent yields of 7833 and 8801 kg ha
returns for each cropping system were calculated respectively. This might be due to the absence of
by deducing cost of cultivation from gross competition between pigeonpea and intercrops
returns. B: C ratio was also calculated for each for growth resources such as nutrients, moisture,
cropping system. The various formulae used are solar raditation because maize and groundnut
given below: crops were harvested before flowering period of
pigeonpea and groundnut being leguminous crop
-1
Net returns (Rs ha ) = Gross returns (Rs show no competition of resources. These results
-1 -1
ha ) – Cost of cultivation of crop (Rs ha ) are close conformity with the findings of Kumar et
al. [10]. Out of the two fodder crops, fodder
-1 -1
B:C ratio = Net return (Rs ha )/ Cost of sorghum + fodder cowpea (1:2) (4512 kg ha )
-1 -1
cultivation (Rs ha ) and fodder maize (4241 kg ha ) systems were
on par with each other. Rice and Bt cotton were
2.1 Data Analysis and Statistics tested as pre-dominant cropping systems of the
region and recorded almost similar rice grain
-1
The experimental data was analysed by adopting equivalent yields with 5728 and 5885 kg ha
RBD statistical tool and analysis of variance was respectively. These results were supported by
worked out as suggested by Rao [7]. Pragathi Kumari et al. [11].
53
Kumari et al.; CJAST, 39(29): 51-60, 2020; Article no.CJAST.61475
improving soil health, groundnut crop recorded resulted in comparatively higher rice grain
significantly higher rice grain equivalent yield equivalent yield over horsegram followed by
-1 -1
(6251 kg ha ) and net returns (74620 Rsha ) sunhemp crops, though both the systems were
-1
than sesame (2696 kg ha with net returns of on par with each other. Rice – Maize was tested
-1
24523 Rs ha ) crop. Out of the two systems as pre-dominant cropping systems of the region
tested to meet the household nutritional security, and recorded rice grain equivalent yield of 5557
-1 -1
groundnut crop recorded significantly higher rice kgha with net returns of 66,235 Rsha . Pragathi
-1
grain equivalent yield (7113 kg ha ) and net Kumari et al. [13] have reported similar results on
-1
returns (90425 Rsha ) than ragi. Out of the two the study which was conducted with the same
-1
fodder crops, lucerne crop (2990 kg ha ) cropping systems.
54
Kumari et al.; CJAST, 39(29): 51-60, 2020; Article no.CJAST.61475
55
Kumari et al.; CJAST, 39(29): 51-60, 2020; Article no.CJAST.61475
Table 2. Performance of crops in various cropping systems during rabi and summer, 2019-20
-1 -1 -1
Trt Cropping sequence Economic yield (kg ha ) Straw yield (kg ha ) Rice grain equivalent yield (kg ha )
Rabi Summer Rabi Summer Grain Rabi Summer Straw Rabi Summer Total
T1 Maize 5395 7020 5174 383 5557
T2 Fallow 0 0 0 0 0
T3 Groundnut 2016 2420 5592 659 6251
T4 Sesame 756 1658 2673 23 2696
T5 Groundnut 2144 4281 5946 1167 7113
T6 Ragi 1832 3845 3145 52 3197
T7 Horsegram - Sunhemp 8973 15467 0 978 1264 2242
T8 Lucerne 27430 0 2990 2990
T9 Tomato 27309 5528 14882 75 14957
T10 Mariegold - Beetroot 14945 17122 7911 4554 24433 9331 108 62 33934
CD (at 5%) 2511
SEm + 838
CV (%) 11
-1
Sale price for grain (kg ): Maize = Rs 17.6, Rice = Rs 18.35, Tomato = Rs 10.0, Groundnut = Rs 50.9, Sesame = Rs 64.85, Fingermillet = Rs 31.5, Marigold = Rs 30.00, Beetroot = Rs 10.00
-1
Sale price for stover (kg ): Maize = Rs 1.00, Rice = Rs 1.00, Tomato = Rs 0.25, Groundnut =Rs 5.00, Sesame =Rs 0.25, Fingermillet = Rs 0.25, Horsegram = Rs 2.0, Sunhemp = Rs1.5, Lucerne = Rs 2.0, Marigold =
Rs 0.25, Beetroot = Rs 0.25
56
Kumari et al.; CJAST, 39(29): 51-60, 2020; Article no.CJAST.61475
-1
Treatments Kharif (2019) Rabi (2019-20) Summer Rice Grain Equivalent Yield (kg ha ) Productivity
(2019-20)
-1
Kharif-Rabi Grain yield Straw/ Grain Straw/Sta Grain Stover Kharif Rabi Summer (RGEY kg ha )
-1
(kg ha ) Stover yield (kg Yield lk/ Stover Yield yield
-1
ha ) yield
-1 -1 -1 -1
Main Inter Main Inter (kg ha ) (kg ha ) (kg ha ) (kg ha ) Grain Straw Grain Straw Grain Straw Kharif Rabi Summer System
crop crop crop crop
T5 Pigeon pea+Maize 564 5858 1787 7478 2144 4281 432 7402 5946 1167 7833 7113 0 14946
(1:3)-Groundnut
T6 Pigeonpea + 124 1506 3996 2383 1832 3845 8097 704 3145 52 8801 3197 0 11998
Groundnut (1:7) - 0
Ragi
T7 Fodder sorghum + 0 0 12648 19166 8973 15467 0 4512 0 978 1264 4512 978 1264 6754
Fodder cowpea (1:2)
– Horsegram -
Sunhemp
T8 Fodder maize - 0 0 38911 0 27430 0 4241 0 2990 4241 2990 0 7231
Lucerne
T9 Sweetcorn- 152 0 18642 0 27309 5528 7481 1524 1488 75 9005 14957 0 23962
Vegetables 53 2
(Tomato)
T1 Okra – Marigold - 629 0 1588 0 14945 7911 17122 4554 6862 22 2443 108 933 62 6884 24541 9393 40817
0 Beetroot 6 3 1
S Em+ 363 762 861
CD (0.05) 1088 2282 2579
CV (%) 9.8 17 19.0
-1
Sale price for Grain (kg ) : Rice = Rs 18.35, Maize = Rs 17.6, Groundnut = Rs 50.9, Bhendi = Rs 20.00, Bt Cotton = Rs 55.0, Greengram = Rs 70.5, Pigeonpea = Rs 58.0, Sweet corn = Rs 9.00, Sesame = Rs
64.85, Fingermillet = Rs 31.5, Marigold = Rs 30.00, Beetroot = Rs 10.00
-1
Sale price for stover (kg ) : Rice = Rs 1.00 Maize = Rs 1.00, Bhendi = Rs 0.25, Groundnut = 5.00, Greengram = Rs 2.00, Sweet corn = Rs 1.5, Bt cotton = 0.25, Pigeonpea = Rs 0.25, Fodder sorghum = Rs 2.00,
Fodder cowpea = 3.00, Fodder maize = 2.00, Tomato = Rs 0.25, Sesame =Rs 0.25, Fingermillet = Rs 0.25, Horsegram = Rs 2.0,
Sunhemp = Rs1.5, Lucerne = Rs 2.0, Marigold = Rs 0.25, and Beetroot = Rs 0.25
57
Kumari et al.; CJAST, 39(29): 51-60, 2020; Article no.CJAST.61475
58
Kumari et al.; CJAST, 39(29): 51-60, 2020; Article no.CJAST.61475
59
Kumari et al.; CJAST, 39(29): 51-60, 2020; Article no.CJAST.61475
uptake and economics of rainfed 12. Kharub AS, Chouhan DS, Sharma RK,
pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and blackgram Chhokar RS, Tripathi SC. Diversification of
(Vigna mungo) intercropping system. rice-wheat system for improving soil fertility
Indian Journal of Agricutural Sciences. and productivity. Indian Journal of
2015;85:171–176. Agronomy. 2003;48(3):149-152.
9. Singh R, Malik JK, Thenua OVS, Jat HS. 13. Kumari Ch. P, Sridevi S, Goverdhan M.
Effect of phosphorus and bio-fertilizer on Profitable cropping systems for Southern
productivity, nutrient uptake and Telangana Zone of Telangana State, India.
economics of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + International Journal of Current
mungbean (Phaseolus radiatus) inter- Microbiology and Applied Sciences.
cropping system. Legume Research. 2018;7(1):2518-2525.
2013;36:41–48. 14. Nagar RK, Goud VV, Kumar R, Kumar R.
10. Kumar P, Rana KS, Ansari MA, Om H. Effect of incorporation of FYM, pigeonpea
Effect of planting system and phosphorous stalk, phosphor-compost on growth, yield
on productivity, moisture use efficiency and and nutrient uptake in pigeonpea based
economics of sole and intercropped intercropping system. Bioscan. 2015;10:
pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) under rainfed 339–343.
conditions of northern India. Indian Journal 15. Sankaranarayanan K, Praharaj CS,
of Agricutural Sciences. 2013;83:549–554. Nalayini P, Bandyopadhya KK,
11. Kumari Ch. P, Goverdhan M, Sridevi S, Gopalakrishnan N. Legume as companion
Reddy GK, Pasha ML, Ramana MV, Rani crop for cotton. Journal of Cotton
B. Profitability of cropping systems module Research and Development. 2010;24(1):
for different farming systems in Southern 115-126.
Telangana zone of Telangana state. 16. CICR. Annual report, 2009-2010. Central
Journal of Pharmacognosy and Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur;
Phytochemistry. 2019;8(3):153-157. 2010.
_________________________________________________________________________________
© 2020 Kumari et al.; This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
Peer-review history:
The peer review history for this paper can be accessed here:
http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/61475
60