0625 Physics Example Candidate Responses Booklet 2012
0625 Physics Example Candidate Responses Booklet 2012
(Standards Booklet)
Cambridge IGCSE®
Physics
0625
Cambridge Secondary 2
Cambridge International Examinations retains the copyright on all its publications. Registered Centres are
permitted to copy material from this booklet for their own internal use. However, we cannot give permission
to Centres to photocopy any material that is acknowledged to a third party even for internal use within a
Centre.
Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 2
Introduction
The main aim of this booklet is to exemplify standards for those teaching Cambridge IGCSE Physics
(0625), and to show how different levels of candidates’ performance relate to the subject’s curriculum and
assessment objectives.
In this booklet a range of candidate responses has been chosen as far as possible to exemplify grades C
and E for Paper 2 and grades A, C and E for Papers 3, 5 and 6. Each response is accompanied by a brief
commentary explaining the strengths and weaknesses of the answers.
For ease of reference the following format for each paper has been adopted:
The mark scheme, used by examiners, is followed by examples of marked candidate responses, each
with an examiner comment on performance. Comments are given to indicate where and why marks were
awarded, and how additional marks could have been obtained. In this way, it is possible to understand what
candidates have done to gain their marks and what they still have to do to improve their grades.
In this booklet a grade is given to each question but in the examination each question paper (whole
candidate script) is graded on the overall mark awarded, not on each question or part question. It is
therefore possible that, on some questions, lower grade candidate scripts are awarded the same or higher
marks than higher grade candidate scripts.
Past papers, examiner reports and other teacher support materials are available on Teacher Support at
http://teachers.cie.org.uk.
Assessment at a glance
Paper 1 45 minutes
Multiple choice question paper
Weighted at 30% of total available marks
Paper 2 is a written, core theory paper consisting of short-answer and structured questions. Questions are
based on the Core curriculum and will be of a difficulty appropriate to grades C to G. Candidates aiming
for grades A* to C must follow the Extended curriculum. Questions will test skills mainly in assessment
objectives A (Knowledge with understanding) and B (Handling information and problem solving).
Question 1
Mark scheme
Question 2
Mark scheme
Question 3
Mark scheme
Question 4
Mark scheme
Question 5
Mark scheme
wrong button, he would have lost both marks, as there would have been no evidence that he knew the
physics behind the numbers. The audible range of frequencies is not known, but the effect of increasing the
speed of the wheel is known.
Question 6
Mark scheme
Question 7
Mark scheme
not to mention it. The drawing of the magnetic field pattern shows some understanding, and is better than
the attempts of many other candidates. However, the field lines should not cross or touch anywhere, so the
final mark is lost. Candidates need to understand that accuracy in drawings is just as important as accuracy
in calculations. Examiners do not ignore inaccuracy just because it appears in a diagram.
that accuracy in drawings is just as important as accuracy in calculations. Examiners do not ignore
inaccuracy just because it appears in a diagram.
Question 8
Mark scheme
Question 9
Mark scheme
line of working. In common with most other candidates, the reasons for high voltage are not understood, at
least not in connection with cheapness.
Question 10
Mark scheme
is a much better attempt than most, and is worth one mark. The fact is known that the resultant force on a
body in equilibrium is zero.
Question 11
Mark scheme
Question 12
Mark scheme
Paper 3 is a written, extended theory paper consisting of short-answer and structured questions. Questions
will be based on the Extended curriculum and will be of a difficulty appropriate to the higher grades.
Questions will test skills mainly in assessment objectives A (Knowledge with understanding) and B
(Handling information and problem solving). A quarter of the marks available will be based on Core material
and the remainder on the Supplement.
Question 1
Mark scheme
Examiner comment
(a) The answer ‘rate of change of speed’ is an acceptable variation of the definition of acceleration,
though ‘velocity’ rather than ‘speed’ would have been a better alternative. The added material was
unnecessary, but did not contradict the previous work.
(b) An appropriate approach was used and the correct value calculated.
(c) Two marks could be given for the calculation of the time during which acceleration took place and a
further mark for starting the upward slope at the correct time. However, the time calculated was not
used correctly in the completion of the graph, and no further marks were awarded.
(b) A correct approach was used and the right value calculated.
(c) No meaningful attempt at a calculation of the time of acceleration was given. Marks were awarded for
starting the upward slope at the correct time, and for the final constant speed section of the graph.
(b) The candidate did not take account of the varying speed, using distance = speed x time and the initial
speed in the calculation. Finding the area under the appropriate section of the graph would have been
the best option.
(c) An unsuccessful attempt to find the time of acceleration was made. Marks were only awarded for starting the
upward slope at the correct time, and for the final constant speed section of the graph.
Question 2
Mark scheme
(b) (i) The correct formula was quoted. The formula was initially used correctly, but a contradictory
calculation followed so only a single mark was possible.
(ii) The kinetic energy formula was stated and used correctly, giving full marks.
(b) (i) The correct formula was quoted and used correctly, but a mark was lost because the wrong unit
was given.
(ii) The correct formula was quoted and used correctly. Again, the wrong unit was given, but since
only one unit penalty is applied per question, full marks could be awarded.
(b) (i) The correct formula was quoted and used correctly, but a mark was lost because the wrong unit
was given.
(ii) Having correctly stated the formula, the candidate failed to square the speed in the calculation and
lost a mark. No penalty was applied for the wrong unit.
Question 3
Mark scheme
(b) (i) The mistake in calculating one of the clockwise moments was treated as an arithmetic error,
resulting in the loss of a mark.
(ii) The difference between the upward force and the total downward force had to be calculated.
There was no indication that this had been attempted. The downward direction was clearly stated
and gained a mark.
(b) (i) The clockwise moment was calculated correctly, but only one of the anticlockwise moments was
identified. Only one mark could be awarded.
(ii) The candidate attempted a further solution using the principle of moments, which could have
been successful if correctly carried out. However, the point about which to take moments was not
identified and three forces, not two, had to be included in the equation.
(b) (i) The clockwise moments were both calculated correctly and added together, and gained a mark.
No further work followed.
Question 4
Mark scheme
(b) The correct formula was quoted and used correctly, but a mark was lost because the wrong unit was
given.
(c) Various suggestions were possible, but the one made by the candidate is not a valid one.
(c) The mistaken suggestion that the mercury has a lower temperature indicates a possible confusion
between a thermometer and a barometer, a common feature of answers to this question.
(b) By calculating the pressure due to the given height of mercury, the candidate had clearly made the
correct inference from the details given. The omission of the unit from a correct value meant the forfeit
of a mark.
(c) The suggestion of a lower temperature of the mercury causing less expansion and therefore a smaller
‘h’ indicates a possible confusion between a thermometer and a barometer.
Question 5
Mark scheme
(ii) This question proved to be difficult for most candidates. The idea that a change in pressure, as
well as change in temperature, also causes the volume of a gas to change, had to be expressed
in some way. This candidate’s reference to increase of pressure causing increase of temperature
could not be rewarded.
(b) (i) The mark scheme allowed several possible reasons for the suitability of alcohol as a thermometric
liquid. The candidate’s statements were accepted as agreeing or being equivalent to two of these
reasons.
(ii) The concept of the sensitivity of a measuring instrument is a difficult one for many candidates.
The answer ‘decrease the capillary’, with the benefit of some doubt, was taken to imply ‘make
the capillary bore thinner’ and given a mark. The answer ‘increase length of the bulb’ was not
rewarded, volume being the relevant factor.
(c) No reference to faster heat flow or faster response or their causes was made.
(b) (i) ‘Can detect change of temperature easily’ with no reason given, was not rewarded. A mark was
allowed for the correct idea expressed by the words ‘has low thermal capacity’.
(c) No reference was made to faster heat flow or faster response or their causes.
Question 6
Mark scheme
2. The candidate knows that a louder sound means that waves have a greater amplitude. However,
the rather difficult idea as to how this changes the spacing of air layers in the compressions and
rarefactions was not addressed.
(ii) The distance between two successive compressions was accurately shown as the wavelength.
(b) The omission of the unit from the correct answer in this rather difficult, multi-step calculation meant
that the candidate could not gain the final mark for the question.
2. The candidate knows that a louder sound means that waves have a greater amplitude, but the
effect of this increase on the spacing of air layers in the compressions and rarefactions was not
addressed.
(ii) The distance between two successive compressions was shown as the wavelength with
acceptable accuracy.
(b) The candidate used the delay in the time as the time taken for the sound to travel through the steel and
no marks could be awarded. The suggestion is that the question was not read with sufficient care.
2 The candidate’s statement that the compressions would be longer could not be accepted
without further explanation.
(b) The candidate used the delay in the time as the time taken for the sound to travel through the steel and
no marks could be awarded.
Question 7
Mark scheme
(iii) The refraction of the ray on entering the block was shown correctly. The emerging ray, needing to
be parallel to the incident ray, was entirely wrong, losing the second mark.
(b) (i) The correct formula was quoted and used correctly.
(ii) The refracted ray in the block was correctly shown with a larger angle of refraction than the red
ray. The error made in (a)(iii) was then repeated, losing the second mark.
(ii) The omission of the unit from an otherwise correct answer meant that the candidate did not gain
the second mark.
(iii) The refraction of the ray on entering the block was shown correctly. The emerging ray, needing to
be parallel to the incident ray, was entirely wrong, losing the second mark.
(b) (i) The candidate had clearly remembered the principle of this calculation, but inverted the quantities
substituted on the right-hand side of the equation. Failure to write down the formula before the
substitution may have contributed to the mistake. No marks could be awarded.
(ii) The refracted ray in the block was correctly shown with a larger angle of refraction than the red ray.
The error made in (a)(iii) was then repeated, losing the second mark.
(ii) Division by the angle of incidence, rather than the sine of the angle, was wrong.
(iii) Failure to draw the emerging ray meant the loss of the second mark.
(b) (i) The correct calculation was carried out, but the unit of the answer was omitted, losing a mark.
(ii) The refracted violet ray was shown on the wrong side of the normal, with no emerging ray drawn.
Question 8
Mark scheme
(b) (i) The correct calculation was carried out, but the unit of the answer was omitted, and lost a mark.
(ii) The candidate used the formula equating the powers in the two coils to calculate the correct
current. No penalty was applied for the omission of the unit, a unit penalty having already been
applied in (b)(i).
(b) (i) The correct formula was quoted and gained a mark. The data was substituted wrongly.
(ii) With the error from (b)(i) carried forward, the answer obtained was awarded with both marks.
(b) (i) The candidate wrote down the correct numerical answer and unit with no formula or substitution
shown. Both marks were gained.
(ii) The wrong current, with no unit, was written down, again with no preceding work. The answer
shown could have been arrived by substituted wrongly into a correct formula. This emphasises the
need to write down a formula before attempting a calculation.
Question 9
Mark scheme
(ii) The correct value for the potential difference was stated.
(b) One of the graphs was read wrongly, so that one of the calculated values for a resistance was
inaccurate. This error incurred a one mark penalty.
(ii) The correct value for the potential difference was stated.
(b) Credit could only be given for stating a relevant formula for the combination of two resistors in parallel.
(ii) It is difficult to surmise how the candidate arrived at the wrong value for the potential difference.
(b) A mark was awarded for the formula for the combination of resistors in parallel. The candidate then
substituted values for current rather than resistance in the formula and gained no further credit.
Question 10
Mark scheme
(b) An acceptable example was given of how a lamp switches off when the temperature of an engine
component becomes too high.
Mark awarded = 4 out of 6
(ii) Although much of the answer gained no credit, a mark was awarded for stating that at low
temperature the transistor switches on the lamp.
(b) In common with many answers, the candidate suggested a fire alarm, but did not add an explanation of
its effect on the circuit in question.
(ii) The answer only succeeded in repeating information provided in the introduction to the question,
and no marks could be awarded.
(b) A mark could not be awarded for the suggestion, with no further explanation, of a fire alarm.
Question 11
Mark scheme
(ii) The cathode’s purpose, to emit electrons (when heated), was correctly stated and gained the
mark.
(iii) Two aspects were required. The first is that of attracting or accelerating electrons. The second
could have been expressed in a variety of ways, the best of which is to focus or direct the beam
towards the screen. Only the first, which gained a mark, was addressed in the answer.
(b) (i) The essential point required was to express the idea that a potential difference has to be applied
between the plates. The answer gave insufficient detail of this, but gained a mark for showing the
upper plate as positively charged and the lower one as negatively charged.
(ii) The sketch showed the straight field lines between the plates, with sufficient accuracy to gain the
first mark and the arrows on the field lines, pointing downwards, to gain the other.
(a) (i) This candidate wrote that the heater emits electrons, rather than the fact that it heats the cathode.
This was a common misconception.
(iii) A mark was allowed for stating one of the functions of the anode system, that of attracting
electrons. No reference was made to its other function, the production of a fine beam of electrons
which passes through to the screen, a point which could have been made in several acceptable
ways.
(b) (i) The placing of positive and negative charges on the plates in the figure sufficed to gain a mark. No
mention was made as how a battery or voltage supply is used to bring about, so no further credit
was given.
(ii) No attempt was made to sketch the pattern of field lines between the plates.
(ii) The answer complied with the mark scheme and gained the mark.
(b) (i) The suggestion that the Y-plates emit gamma rays seemed to be no more than a random guess.
(ii) No attempt to sketch the field was made. The lines and symbols drawn suggested a follow-up of
the spurious answer to (a)(iii).
Paper 5 is the Practical Test which covers experimental and observational skills. The purpose of this
component is to test appropriate skills in assessment objective C (Experimental skills and investigations).
Candidates are not be required to use knowledge outside the Core curriculum.
Question 1
Mark scheme
(b) The candidate again works through the steps and answers correctly.
(c) The mark is scored because the candidate carries out the procedure with care and therefore the V W
value is within the tolerance allowed.
(d) The candidate makes three good suggestions that answer the question and therefore scores all three
available marks. The first three reasons given focus on possible inaccuracies that are inherent in the
experiment, rather than the result of careless technique. The final reason is not worthy of a mark
because it describes careless spilling of some water. However, since three valid reasons have been
given, there is no penalty for this.
(b) The candidate again works through the steps and answers correctly.
(c) The value obtained for V W is outside the tolerance allowed, showing that the experiment has not been
carried out as carefully as expected. So, the mark is not awarded.
(d) The candidate is unable to make suitable suggestions, perhaps indicating a lack of personal experience
with this type of experiment. The first three reasons given are very vague and the last reason is describing
careless technique rather than a possible inaccuracy that is inherent in the experiment.
(b) The candidate gives a value of V3 (65) that is just acceptable, V4 is greater than V3 and the difference
calculation is correct. The V4 value, however, is incorrect.
(c) Although the V W and V4 values are within 5 cm3 of each other, the mark cannot be awarded as this is a
mark for overall quality of the experimental work and the values do not come from correct work.
(d) The candidate is unable to make suitable suggestions, perhaps indicating a lack of personal experience
with this type of experiment resulting in vague statements that do not address the question set.
Question 2
Mark scheme
(b) In the table, the candidate gives the correct units for d and θ. The values for d are also correct but
the temperatures are not increasing as expected (it is possible that the candidate used distances of
100 cm, 80 cm, etc.) so a mark is lost. However, the temperatures are shown to at least 1 °C (they are
not all given to the nearest 5 °C or 10 °C) so the final mark is gained.
(c) The candidate scores both marks as θ V is greater than θ H and the temperature difference is correctly
calculated alongside the correct conclusion.
(d) The candidate suggests ‘wind’ and ‘humidity’ as the relevant conditions to be controlled. The first
response is judged to be equivalent to a reference to avoidance of draughts and the second is allowed
as an alternative to the expected reference to room temperature.
(e) The candidate suggests a sensible precaution involving allowing time for the thermometer to respond
to the temperature changes before taking readings.
(b) In the table, the candidate gives the correct units for d and θ. The values for d are also correct but the
temperatures are not increasing as expected, so a mark is lost. However, the temperatures are shown
to at least 1 °C so the final mark is gained.
(c) The candidate scores both marks as θ V is greater than θ H and the temperature difference is correctly
calculated alongside the correct conclusion.
(d) The candidate makes two vague statements that do not answer the question.
(e) A statement about how a parallax error could be avoided in this experiment would have scored a mark,
but here the candidate makes a confused statement.
(b) The candidate records the units, d values and temperatures in the table and scores full marks.
(c) The candidate’s value of θ V is too low. The temperature difference is wrongly calculated and the
conclusion is incorrect.
(e) The candidate attempts a suggestion about avoidance of parallax errors but a reference to ‘eye level’ is
too vague.
Question 3
Mark scheme
(b) The candidate labels the graph axes correctly and plots the points accurately. The line drawn is a good,
thin, best-fit line. A mark is lost, however, because the y-axis scale is very cramped.
(c) The candidate uses the triangle method correctly to determine the gradient and shows clearly on the
graph a triangle that uses more than half the line.
(d) The candidate gives the value for resistance to three significant figures and includes the unit Ω , scoring
both of the available marks.
(b) The candidate labels the graph axes correctly and plots the points accurately. The line drawn is a good,
thin, best-fit line but a mark is lost because some of the plots are too large. A second mark is lost
because the y-axis scale is very cramped.
(c) The candidate uses the triangle method correctly to determine the gradient but the triangle uses less
than half the line.
(d) The candidate gives the value for resistance to two significant figures but does not include the unit Ω ,
scoring one of the two available marks.
(b) The graph axes are labelled correctly but the scale on the y-axis is too cramped. The plotting is
inaccurate and the line drawn is not the best-fit line, it appears to join the first and last plots, ignoring
those in between.
(c) The candidate uses the triangle method correctly to determine the gradient and shows clearly on the
graph a triangle that uses more than half the line.
(d) The candidate gives the resistance value to only one significant figure, losing a mark, but the unit Ω is
correctly given.
Question 4
Mark scheme
(g) The x and y values are within the tolerance allowed and the two focal length values are the same to
within ± 1 cm. Both focal length values are recorded to three significant figures with the correct unit.
(h) The candidate makes a correct statement and gives an appropriate justification.
(g) The x and y values are unrealistic but the two f values are the same and given to three significant
figures with the appropriate unit.
(h) The candidate makes a correct statement and gives an appropriate justification.
(g) Here, the x and y values are within the tolerance allowed but the two f values are not the same to
within ± 1 cm. Both f values are given to too many significant figures.
(h) The candidate’s statement matches the results but the justification given is not worthy of a mark.
Paper 6 is a written paper designed to test candidates’ familiarity with laboratory practical procedure. The
purpose of this component is to test appropriate skills in assessment objective C (Experimental skills and
investigations). Candidate are not be required to use knowledge outside the Core curriculum.
Question 1
Mark scheme
The candidate draws a straight line and, although a slightly better fit is possible, the line drawn is
judged to be a best-fit line within the tolerance allowed.
(b) The candidate clearly shows the triangle method for determining the gradient and uses a large triangle.
The result for the value of G is within the tolerance allowed.
(c) The candidate correctly calculates the value of W and expresses it to three significant figures with the
correct unit, N.
(d) The candidate correctly explains how to find the position of the centre of mass, but loses the final
mark. This mark could have been gained by describing how to add small pieces of modelling clay (or
similar material) to one end of the rule, without loads, until it balances on the pivot at the 50.0 cm mark.
Alternatively readings can be taken from the 49.7 cm mark.
(b) The candidate shows the triangle method for determining the gradient and uses a large triangle. The
result for the value of G is within the tolerance allowed.
(c) The candidate correctly calculates the value of W and expresses it to three significant figures with the
correct unit, N.
(d) The candidate is unable to make suitable suggestions, perhaps indicating a lack of personal experience
with this type of experiment.
(b) The candidate clearly shows the triangle method for determining the gradient and uses a large triangle.
The result for the value of G is within the tolerance allowed.
(c) The calculation is correct but given to too many significant figures and with the wrong unit.
(d) The candidate is unable to make suitable suggestions, perhaps indicating a lack of personal experience
with this type of experiment.
Question 2
Mark scheme
(c) 1. The candidate may be thinking, correctly, of viewing the thermometer scale at a right angle to avoid
a parallax error. However the wording is too vague to score the mark.
2. The candidate writes a sensible precaution related to the experiment, but it does not answer the
question about reliability of the temperature value. A reference to waiting for the temperature to
stabilise or stirring would have gained the mark.
(d) The correct answer here is ‘heat loss to the surroundings’. In this case, the candidate misses the
opportunity to write a concise answer and produces a long and complicated response which does
not quite get to the point and leaves doubt as to whether the candidate understands the difference
between heat and temperature.
(f) The candidate suggests two variables to keep constant. Both are correct so the mark is scored.
(b) The calculation is correct, taking into account the candidate’s own answer for part (a).
(c) The candidate’s first suggestion is too vague to score a mark and the second suggestion is not relevant
to this question.
(d) The candidate makes a vague statement and does not show understanding that heat is lost to the
surroundings.
(e) The candidate’s suggestion of repeated readings is not relevant here as it is not a modification to the
experiment.
(f) The candidate’s suggestion is not accepted because the question makes clear that the volume of the
water is already a constant value.
Question 3
Mark scheme
(ii) The candidate states that the experimental results support the theory and justifies the statement
well by pointing out that the difference in results (0.27 A and 0.28 A) is within the limits of
experimental accuracy. The wording is sufficiently clear to show the candidate’s understanding.
(b) The candidate knows that the purpose of the variable resistor is to control the current.
(c) (i) The candidate uses the standard symbol for a voltmeter and shows the voltmeter correctly
connected.
(iii) The candidate gives the answer with the correct unit and to three significant figures. However,
a mark is lost as the answer is incorrectly rounded. (8.148 should be written as 8.15, to three
significant figures.)
(ii) The candidate does not realise that the difference in results (0.27 A and 0.28 A) is within the limits
of experimental accuracy.
(b) The candidate knows that the purpose of the variable resistor is to control the current.
(c) (i) The candidate uses the standard symbol for a voltmeter and shows the voltmeter correctly
connected.
(iii) The candidate calculates the resistance using a wrong value for the current, but gives the answer
to three significant figures with the correct unit, so scores one of the two available marks.
(ii) The candidate does not realise that the difference in results (0.27 A and 0.28 A) is within the limits
of experimental accuracy.
(b) The answer is too vague to convincingly show that the candidate understands that the variable resistor
controls the current.
(iii) The resistance value is correctly calculated and given to three significant figures but the unit Ω is
missing.
Question 4
Mark scheme
(ii) The line AB is a continuous, straight line of the specified length and at the correct angle of
incidence.
(b) The line through P 2 and P 3 to the normal is drawn correctly and the value of the angle of incidence r is
within the allowed tolerance.
(ii) The line AB is just acceptable as a straight line of the specified length but it is not at the correct
angle of incidence.
(b) The line through P 2 and P 3 to the normal is drawn correctly but the value of the angle of incidence r is
not within the allowed tolerance.
(d) The candidate chooses two of the three suggested precautions. Sensible use of significant figures is
not an experimental precaution.
(ii) The candidate draws line AB in the wrong position and not of the required length.
(b) The line through P 2 and P 3 to the normal is drawn correctly but the value of the angle of incidence r is
not given.
Question 5
Mark scheme
(b) The candidate realises that a metre rule would be impractical for such a large distance and correctly
suggests a tape measure.
(c) The candidate obtains the correct answer and shows the working clearly.
(d) The candidate realises that the student’s reaction time will cause inaccuracy, so fewer significant figures are
more appropriate.
(c) The candidate obtains the correct answer and shows the working clearly.
(d) The candidate does not realise that the student’s reaction time will cause inaccuracy, so fewer
significant figures are more appropriate.
(b) The candidate correctly suggests a measuring tape. The mark is awarded for a correct answer in spite
of the incorrect response to part (a).
(c) The candidate shows the correct method of working, but performs the calculation incorrectly.
(d) The statement is correct, but no mark is awarded as a sensible reason is not given.
*4424088583*