Scribd
Upload
24 views2 pages

Items Quality Report

The document provides instructions for a quality control group to evaluate sample items using specific criteria. For each item, the group is to: 1) Rate the quality as substandard, good, very good, or excellent and explain their observations; 2) Determine if the item is acceptable to distribute or should be rejected; and 3) Provide recommendations to the manufacturer if the quality is less than excellent. The document also includes a peer evaluation checklist to assess each group member's contribution.

Uploaded by

Aira Lasierdo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
24 views2 pages

Items Quality Report

The document provides instructions for a quality control group to evaluate sample items using specific criteria. For each item, the group is to: 1) Rate the quality as substandard, good, very good, or excellent and explain their observations; 2) Determine if the item is acceptable to distribute or should be rejected; and 3) Provide recommendations to the manufacturer if the quality is less than excellent. The document also includes a peer evaluation checklist to assess each group member's contribution.

Uploaded by

Aira Lasierdo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

GROUP NAME: ______________________________________________________________________

Pretend that you are part of a Quality Control Department of a company. You need to examine each item (Cellphone, shoes, bag, watch,
ballpen, t-shirt, etc.) You will be guided by the following questions.

CRITERIA
ITEM (answer using the guide question) Clarity/ Connections
Organization
1. How will you rate its quality? Is it substandard, good, very good, or excellent?
2. What makes you say so? List down your specific observations and why you have concluded that it is
of that particular quality.
3. Is the product acceptable for distribution/selling? Or should it be rejected completely? To be filled by the teacher
4. If the item is less excellent, what would you do differently if you were the manufacturer? Give your
recommendations.
NAME: CELLPHONE 1. How will you rate its quality? Is it substandard, good, very good, or excellent?
2. What makes you say so? List down your specific observations and why you have concluded that it is
of that particular quality.
Contributor: NAME OF 3. Is the product acceptable for distribution/selling? Or should it be rejected completely?
MEMBER/LEADER 4. If the item is less excellent, what would you do differently if you were the manufacturer? Give your
recommendations.
NAME: 1.
2.
3.
Contributor: 4.
NAME: 1.
2.
3.
Contributor: 4.
NAME: 1.
2.
3.
Contributor: 4.
NAME: 1.
2.
3.
Contributor: 4.
NAME: 1.
2.
3.
Contributor: 4.
SCORE
TOTAL AND GRADE
PEER EVALUATION CHECKLIST

Group Member Name Part Assigned Contribution Rating (0- no contribution to 5 –


completed his/her part assigned)

RUBRIC
CRITERIA OUTSTANDING AVERAGE FAIR NEEDS
(5 POINTS) (3 POINTS) (2 POINTS) IMPROVEMANT
(1 POINT)
Clarity/Organization Concepts were clearly Concepts were clearly Concepts were not Incorrect, not
explained; thoughts explained but the flow explained well; flow of accurate description
are well-organized. of discussion is not thoughts were of concepts;
clear. disorganized. disorganized
discussion.
Connections Connections between Connections were Connections were not No connections were
concept and example made but needs accurate. made or incorrect.
given were very clear. further explanation.

GRADING SCALE:
40-60 = 95
35-39= 90
30-34= 85
25-29= 80
20-24= 75

You might also like