TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH

BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT

KEADY COMMUNITY CENTRE
BUILDING CONDITION
ASSESSMENT
KEADY COMMUNITY
CENTRE
116931 GREY ROAD 3,
TARA, ONTARIO
TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH

VERSION 1

PROJECT NO.: 181-11748-00

DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 2018

WSP

WSP.COM
 November 27, 2018

TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH
Civic #316837 Highway 6, RR#1 Chatsworth ON
N0H 1G0

Attention: Valerie Manning, Treasurer

Dear Madam:

Subject: Keady Community Centre - Building Condition Assessment

WSP Canada Inc. (WSP) was retained by the Township of Chatsworth to carry out a
multidisciplinary Building Condition Assessment (BCA) including a Designated
Substances & Hazardous Materials Survey (DSS) of the Sullivan (Desboro) and Keady
Community Centres. This report covers the Keady Community Centre BCA; the Sullivan
Centre BCA is provided under separate cover.
This report lays out are methods, observations, and findings. Prioritized
recommendations for repair/replacement of building elements over a 10-year
forecasted period are provided, along with cost estimates.
We trust that the attached report is satisfactory for your purposes. Please contact the
undersigned should you have any questions or concerns

Yours sincerely,

Chris Hodgkinson
Electrical Engineer

CH/CH

WSP ref.: 181-11748-00

wsp.com
REVISION HISTORY

Issue Issue Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by

Description Date

FIRST ISSUE 27 / Nov / 2018 Chris Hodgkinson Chris Hodgkinson Chris Wilson

BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT – KEADY COMMUNITY CENTRE WSP

Project No. 181-11748-00
Township of Chatsworth Page i
SIGNATURES
REVIEWED BY:

Chris Hodgkinson, P.Eng.

Senior Electrical Engineer November 25, 2018

Name, Designation) Date

Title

APPROVED BY:

Chris Wilson, P.Eng.

Senior Civil Engineer November 27, 2018

Name, Designation) Date

Title

WSP prepared this report solely for the use of the intended recipient, TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH, in
accordance with the professional services agreement. The intended recipient is solely responsible for the
disclosure of any information contained in this report. The content and opinions contained in the present
report are based on the observations and/or information available to WSP at the time of preparation. If a
third party makes use of, relies on, or makes decisions in accordance with this report, said third party is
solely responsible for such use, reliance or decisions. WSP does not accept responsibility for damages, if
any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken by said third party based on
this report. This limitations statement is considered an integral part of this report.
The original of this digital file will be conserved by WSP for a period of not less than 10 years. As the digital
file transmitted to the intended recipient is no longer under the control of WSP, its integrity cannot be
assured. As such, WSP does not guarantee any modifications made to this digital file subsequent to its
transmission to the intended recipient.

BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT – KEADY COMMUNITY CENTRE WSP

Project No. 181-11748-00
Township of Chatsworth Page ii
CONTRIBUTORS
TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH (CLIENT)

Requirements Jamie Morgan

Facilities Manager

Questionnaire Response Ian Henderson

Keady Arena Manager

WSP / A49

Electrical Assessment, Chris Hodgkinson, P.Eng

Coordination & Report Consolidation

Architectural Assessment Mark Falkenburger, Dip.Arch.Tech.

Septic Assessment Brian Cooper, C.Tech.

Approval Chris Wilson, P.Eng.

SUBCONSULTANTS

Structural Assessment Brent Freiburger, P.Eng

The Engineering Company

Mechanical Assessment Andrew Wright, P.Eng

Elevation Engineering

BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT – KEADY COMMUNITY CENTRE WSP

Project No. 181-11748-00
Township of Chatsworth Page iii
Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

TABLE OF CONTENTS
REVISION HISTORY ................................................................................................................................................................... i
SEALS/SIGNATURES ................................................................................................................................................................ii
CONTRIBUTIONS ..................................................................................................................................................................... iii

1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 SCOPE AND METHOD ......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 EXCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 2

2.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................ 3

3.0 OBSERVATIONS................................................................................................................................. 5
3.1 ARCHITECTURAL ................................................................................................................................................... 5
3.2 STRUCTURAL ........................................................................................................................................................... 10
3.3 MECHANICAL ..........................................................................................................................................................27
3.4 ELECTRICAL ..............................................................................................................................................................32
3.5 CIVIL ............................................................................................................................................................................... 39

4.0 SCHEDULE OF BUILDING UPGRADES

& ESTIMATED COSTS ..................................................................................................................... 41
4.1 ARCHITECTURAL ................................................................................................................................................ 42
4.2 STRUCTURAL .......................................................................................................................................................... 43
4.3 MECHANICAL ......................................................................................................................................................... 45
4.4 ELECTRICAL ............................................................................................................................................................. 46
4.5 TOTALS .........................................................................................................................................................................47

5.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................. 48

5.1 CRITICAL DEFICIENCIES ................................................................................................................................. 48
5.2 COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 50
5.3 ICE PLANT (NOT-IN-SCOPE) .......................................................................................................................... 51
5.3 NEXT STEPS AND COMMENTARY ........................................................................................................... 52

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey
APPENDIX B Building History Questionnaire
APPENDIX C Photographs
APPENDIX D Mechanical Equipment Summary

November 2018
Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND

In 2018, the Township of Chatsworth retained WSP, in partnership with Architecture49, to conduct a
Building Condition Assessment (BCA) of both Sullivan (Desboro) and Keady Community Centres. This
report includes the BCA for the Keady Community Centre; the Sullivan Centre BCA is provided under
separate cover.
The Engineering Company and Elevation Engineering were retained by WSP as sub-consultants to
provide the structural and mechanical portions of the assessment, respectively.

The purpose of the BCA is to visually assess the present physical condition of the facility, assess the
accessibility of the facility (AODA), and to provide a designated substance survey of the building.

1.2 SCOPE AND METHOD

The scope of our work included the following:

 Prepared an Interview and Questionnaire to gather information about available documents, basic
building characteristics, reported uses, history of construction and alterations, and known
problems. Refer to Appendix B.

 Designated Substance and Hazardous Materials Survey (sampling, testing, and analysis). Refer
to Appendix A.

 Visual inspection and documentation of the physical condition of all exposed or accessible
components by qualified engineers and technologists, including:
o Roof system
o Building Envelope
o Interior walls
o Floor
o Mechanical: HVAC, plumbing and fire protection
o Electrical: electrical distribution, lighting, emergency lighting and exit signage
o Septic system

 Identification of deficiencies and recommended repair/refurbishment/replacement of the property

elements over a ten-year forecasted period.

 Photo catalog of selected typical deficiencies. Refer to Appendix C.

 Energy Efficiency: a qualitative assessment of potential energy-efficiency improvements.

 Itemized capital improvements with Class ‘D’ opinion of probable costs for each item.

 Preparation of this report to capture all the above.

November 2018 Page 1 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

1.3 EXCLUSIONS
 Review of outstanding orders, if any, relating to the building by Authorities Having Jurisdiction.

 Verification against applicable community Bylaws or Official Plans.

 Destructive inspection.

 Testing of building materials (aside from DSS).

 Calculations to confirm adequacy of the original design.

 Comprehensive Building Code Review.

 Assessment of refrigeration systems (Ice-Making Plant).

 Assessment of Maintenance Policies and Procedures.

 Assessment of Operating Expenses.

 Financial Analysis.

November 2018 Page 2 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

2.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The subject site is the Keady Community Centre located at 116931 Grey Road 3 in the village of Keady
within the Township of Chatsworth, Ontario. It is located south east of the main intersection of Grey Road
3 and Grey County Road 16 in Keady.

The facility is a multi-use community centre that provides space for cultural, athletic and social functions,
as well as acting as a central location for community groups. The facility has the potential to be a central
focus for the community, able to provide activities for residents of all ages; therefore, it is in the best
interest of the community to ensure that this facility continues to function as intended.

The site consists of a main Arena building, one baseball diamond and parking areas. The parking areas
are gravel. The ball diamond has a wire mesh backstop, a section of fence along the right infield and a
separate section along the right outfield, and sports lighting masts enabling play after dusk.

The Arena is a steel and masonry-block structure on poured concrete foundations with a sloped metal
roof and metal panel exterior. The common spaces at the north end of the building are two storeys. The
building contains a multipurpose hockey Arena surrounded by dasher boards and featuring a large score
clock. The main floor of the north end contains a main entrance vestibule on the west side entering into a
lobby. The lobby then opens to a kitchen and assembly hall, staff change room, public washrooms, and
utility rooms. The upper floor of the north end building section has a common assembly space
overlooking the Arena, washrooms, and storage space in an open attic section. The amenities and décor
are basic. There was a strong unpleasant odour in the lobby area and northern Arena passageway.

A summary of the basic history and construction of the Arena building is as follows:
• The Ontario Building Code classifies the building as a Group A Division 2 up to 2 Storeys
“Assembly occupancy” with an occupant load of 0.75 m² per person.
• Timeline:
o 1974: Original building constructed.
o 2002: Full-length east side addition entailing an extension of north assembly hall,
addition of change room and utility room wing, and addition of a south-east corner
storage room.
o 2015: Addition of main entrance enclosed vestibule with barrier-free access.
• Approximately 24,000 sqft (2,230m2) total floor area.
• Construction:
o Concrete slab on grade.
o Steel roofing.
o Main Arena structure: rigid steel frame (columns, girts, E-W roof beams) with N-S roof
purlins.

November 2018 Page 3 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

o North End 2-Storey building section: within main arena rigid steel structure, masonry
block walls, second floor is poured concrete over steel deck on open web steel joists.
o South End Ancillary Structures:
▪ South-West Utility Room: wood-frame construction.
▪ Compressor Room: masonry block walls, cast-in-place concrete slab supporting
a sloped wood framed roof.
▪ Zamboni Room: masonry block walls, open web steel joist roof assembly, flat
roof.
o Protruding Vestibules:
▪ small north vestibule off main hall.
▪ larger newer west main entrance vestibule off lobby.
▪ both: steel structure, steel roof.

November 2018 Page 4 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

3.0 CONDITION ASSESSMENT

3.1 ARCHITECTURAL

To assess the condition of the building envelope, a walk-through visual site review was conducted. We
reviewed the exterior walls from grade and roof levels, and from the interior. No dismantling of any
architectural finishes was done. No destructive or non-destructive testing was conducted. No
calculations were performed to confirm the adequacy of the original design.

The following sub-sections summarize our findings of the visual inspection and assessment at the
building.

3.1.1 EXTERIOR

3.1.1.1 Exterior Walls

The cladding on the building consists of Metal Panel wall system mounted to what is assumed to be a
structural steel beam and column structure with infill block up to 2.4m and with insulation and painted
metal liner panels on the interior. The metal siding appeared to be in fair condition overall except for the
following deficiencies:
• The siding has been buckled by impact in several locations. (Photo A-12-16, 21-25)
• The Mechanical Room walls show signs of moisture penetration. (Photo A-53). The block walls
of the Mechanical and Zamboni rooms are uninsulated and there were gaps in the block.
Attempts have been made to fill them with spray foam. Overall condition of the block is fair;
therefore, the block should be repaired (not necessarily replaced). Insulation is recommended.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Replace damaged sections of metal siding. (<5yrs)
• Repair masonry block of Mechanical and Zamboni rooms. (refer to Structural Section)
• Insulate Mechanical and Zamboni rooms: Z-girts, spray-foam, and metal siding. (<2yrs)

3.1.1.2 Exterior Doors

The Exterior doors are provided on the north, south, east and west sides of the building. There are Six
(6) hollow metal doors, seven (7) aluminum doors, and two (2) overhead doors on the ground level.
These doors exit from the Main Entrance, Service Bay and Mechanical room, and Arena. Generally, the
doors are in good to fair condition with the following exceptions:
• All the hollow metal doors should be painted
• The one overhead door (Photo A-8) should be replaced.

November 2018 Page 5 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Paint all hollow metal exterior doors. (<2yrs)
• Replace one deteriorated overhead door. (<1yr)
• Inspect all door joints and seals, caulk and replace weather-strip seal as needed.
(Immediately)

3.1.1.3 Roofing - General

To assess the condition of the roofing, a visual site review was conducted. No dismantling of any roofing
finishes was done. No destructive or non-destructive testing was conducted. No calculations were
performed to confirm the adequacy of the original design. The following sub-sections summarize our
findings of the visual inspection and assessment at the roof systems at the building.

3.1.1.4 Main Roof

The main roof area is located above the Arena bay and extends beyond to the face of the ancillary space.
The roof assemblies on these areas are a metal panel roofing. The roof appeared to be in fair condition in
this location.
We observed the following deficiencies:
• The caulking material at the joints are fair condition. (Photo A-3-10 )
• The metal panels over the 65% of the Arena have lost its finish and has started to rust. (Photo A-
2-9). The interior liner has hundreds of holes (Photo A-45, 47, 58-60) from no protection from
pucks and shows several areas of water penetrations.
• The vapour barrier is not complete as moisture can now enter in the roof assembly through the
numerous holes.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Biannual inspections of mechanical duct penetrations.
• Calk/seal mechanical duct penetrations. (<1yr)
• Replace Main Roof in medium term. (<5yrs)

3.1.1.5 Zamboni Room Roof

The roof assembly on this area appears to be a 4-ply built up roof. The roof appeared to be in fair
condition in this location. (Photo A-8) but appears to be reaching the end of its lifecycle. There are some
signs of deterioration on the all the flashing. (Photo A-8).

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Replace Zamboni Room roof. (<2yrs)

November 2018 Page 6 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

3.1.1.6 Mechanical Room Roof

The roof assembly on this area is a sloped metal panel roof. The roof appeared to be in good condition in
(Photo A-8 – 10).

3.1.2 INTERIOR

The following sub-sections summarize our findings of the visual inspection and assessment of the interior
finishes of the building.

3.1.2.1 Main Entrance Vestibule

The vestibule is in good condition and the power door operators are operational.

3.1.2.2 Lobby Washrooms

The washrooms are in fair condition with the following exception, the floor finish is coming off in both
Men’s and Women’s washrooms.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Repair and repaint floor finish with epoxy. (<2yrs)

3.1.2.3 Lobby

The Lobby is in fair condition with the following exceptions:

• The floor finish is coming off;
• There are signs of water infiltration (Photo A-32).

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Repair and repaint floor finish with epoxy. (<2yrs)

3.1.2.4 Storage Rooms (North Wing)

These rooms are in fair condition with the following exception, the floor finish is coming off.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Repair and repaint floor finish with epoxy. (<2yrs)

3.1.2.5 Dressing Rooms

The dressing rooms are in fair condition with the following exceptions:
• There are large patches the flooring finish that has flaked off in the showers that should be
replaced. (Photo A-#38, 41)
• There are signs of leaks from plumbing fixtures (Photo A-39 – 40)

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Repair floor finish in showers. (<2yrs)

November 2018 Page 7 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

3.1.2.6 SE Storage Room

The storage area appears to be in good condition except for the condensate drain penetration at the
exterior is not sealed properly. (Photo A-52)

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Seal pipe penetration. (immediately)

3.1.2.7 Mechanical Room Chase

The Mechanical Room (Ammonia Ice Plant) does not appear to be isolated from the Arena with passage
via the header trench. Also, if acting as an engine air intake, the trench should be properly protected from
water ingress from the exterior.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Regarding header trench: ensure Mechanical Room (aka Ammonia Room) is isolated from
the Arena. Protect against water ingress. (immediately)

3.1.2.8 Arena Slab

The Arena slab is in fair condition with several minor cracks. A yearly review should be scheduled.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Implement Annual or Bi-Annual reviews of the Arena slab.

3.1.2.9 Dasher Boards

The dasher boards are in fair condition but should have an in-depth inspection performed to ensure
adequacy as per CAN/CSA-Z262.7-04.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Detailed inspection of dasher boards to CAN/CSA-Z262.7-04. (immediately)

3.1.2.10 Stair #1 (from Lobby)

The flooring is in fair condition. The wall paneling is damaged. There evidence of a major water
penetration on the ceiling tiles.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Repair water damage to wall and ceiling. (<2yrs)

3.1.2.11 Stair #2 (from Circulation Corridor)

The floor, walls and ceiling are in good condition

November 2018 Page 8 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

3.1.2.12 Assembly Hall Entrance Vestibule

The Vestibule is in good condition.

3.1.2.13 Assembly Hall

The walls, floor and ceiling are all in good condition.

3.1.2.14 Assembly Hall Washrooms

The walls, floor and ceiling are all in good condition.

3.1.2.15 Kitchen

The walls, floor and ceiling are all in good condition. The millwork is in fair condition.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Replace millwork. (<5yrs)

3.1.3 BUILDING CODE REVIEW AND OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ISSUES

The Main Entrance, Assembly Hall Entrance and Hall Washrooms are AODA compliant.

Deficiencies:
• Insufficient exit signage in: the access corridor leading to the dressing rooms (north side of arena,
Photo A-35); the access corridor in front of the change rooms (East side of arena); and
associated washroom/shower.
• The second floor does not have a barrier free access. While there is no requirement to provide an
elevator to the second floor in an existing building, it would advantageous to provide if budgeting
allows.

November 2018 Page 9 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

3.2 STRUCTURAL

The site visit at the facility was completed on August 31th, 2018. The structural condition assessment was
a visual non-destructive review of the existing structure that was completed in accordance with the
Professional Engineers Ontario Guideline – “Structural Condition Assessments of Existing Buildings and
Designated Structures”. It should be noted that during the assessment no material samples were taken,
and no localized demolition of the structure, intrusive investigation, or removal of its finished was
undertaken.

The primary objectives of the structural review component in the Building Condition Assessment for the
facility is to:

1) Verify the adequacy of the primary and secondary structural systems to the full extent possible
using non-destructive methods.

2) Survey the existing condition of the building to identify:

a. structural construction defects;

b. signs of structural damage, distress or deformation; or

c. signs of significant deterioration.

3) Assess the use of the building areas to identify deviations from intended use that would result in
occupancy loads that are not in conformance with the intended design loads.

4) Look for additions or alterations that may result an adverse effect on the structure.

5) Identify any building envelope conditions that may adversely affect the structural system.

The existing building structural systems were evaluated to the requirements of the Ontario Building Code
2015 (OBC) for all anticipated occupant loading. The structural review was limited to an assessment of
the primary and secondary structural systems and was based on a review of the ultimate strengths and
serviceability requirements for each system.

3.2.1 Roof Structure (Arena)

The existing roof assembly is supported by galvanized steel purlins (Z girt) that span from North to South
between the structural steel rigid frames that span from the exterior west wall to the exterior east wall.
Our review of the structure was completed using a scissor lift to allow for close inspection of the structural
members to document the existing condition.

November 2018 Page 10 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

The purlins at the north end of the structure were in good condition. However, the further south the more
corrosion that was visible on the purlins. The corrosion was concentrated at the cut ends of the members,
the bolt holes, and at the heel of the section. These locations are to be expected as galvanized
protection is a coating and at all location where to coating is removed, thinned, or cut is where corrosion
is likely to occur (Photo S-01).

The assessment of the rigid frame revealed a similar pattern as the purlins. The sections at the North
end of the structure are in good condition with moderate corrosion observed on the 3rd frame from the
north and increasing in severity towards the south end of the structure. At the south end of the structure
the corrosion is severe with pitting and delamination of the steel in the flanges (Photo S-02). We
observed similar corrosion in the frame bracing (lateral, and cross bracing) (Photo S-03).

The columns and base plates along the east side of the arena are showing signs of light corrosion on the
face of the columns and on the top of the base plates. The columns and baseplates along the west side
of the arena are showing signs of light corrosion on the lower section of the column (Photo S-04). The
rear side of the west columns were not visible at the time of the review as they were embedded in the wall
assembly.

A review of the cross bracing confirmed that the bracing has elongated over the service life which allows
greater lateral movement of the rigid frame.

OVERALL CONDITION: The roof structure is in good condition at the north end and poor
condition at the south end of the structure. The cross bracing is in fair
condition and the columns and base plates also in good condition.
REQUIRED REPAIRS: The purlins and the rigid frame both require repairs. The purlins should
be cleaned of all corrosion and painted with a zinc rich paint while the
rigid frame and base plates should be cleaned and painted with an epoxy
paint. The cross bracing at all locations should also be tightened to
ensure lateral resistance of the structure. (<5yrs)

3.2.2 Arena Floor

The existing arena floor is a cast-in-place concrete floor with an ice-making system that is connected to
the adjacent header pipe. The floor surface showed signs of light shrinkage cracking at various locations
in the slab. These cracks are not a structural concern. The review also identified previous repairs that
were completed at the North end of the ice surface that are performing adequately with no visible
deterioration (Photo S-05). In addition, the assessment identified numerous other areas in the slab that
were scuffed or were visibly discolored.

November 2018 Page 11 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall floor system is in good condition with localized sections of
fair concrete.
REQUIRED REPAIRS: None

3.2.3 Header Trench

The header trench is located at the south end of the ice surface and runs east to west. The trench is
constructed from cast-in-place concrete with 1.5” thick planks (approximately 10” wide) that span the
width of the trench and are in fair condition. The trench contains the Ice Plant header pipe, which is
supported on masonry knee walls that are in fair condition. The side walls of the cast-in-place concrete
trench are in good condition with no observed cracks except for the section of wall across from the
Mechanical room ventilation channel (Photo S-06). The crack does not appear to have any displacement
across it, so we have no structural concern at this time.

The steel angles that support the wood decking are in fair condition with signs of moderate corrosion but
with no visible section loss. Similarly, the steel lintel over the ventilation channel is also in fair condition
with no visible section loss (Photo S-07). It should be noted that neither the trench nor the header pipe is
insulated which results in significant frost accumulation around the pipe and on the surface of the walls.
The cast-in-place concrete at the base of the trench was in fair condition with no observed cracking or
spalling. However, the inspection of the trench was limited to a random, rational review of 4 trench
locations.

An inspection of the header pipe was not completed under the structural scope of work.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition of the header trench is fair with the steel showing
signs of deterioration due to age.
REQUIRED REPAIRS: The steel sections are to be cleaned and painted with an epoxy paint.
(<5yrs)

3.2.4 HVAC Supports

There are two HVAC units in the Arena area. The first is located at the north-west corner and the second
is at the south-east corner. The framed assembly at the north end consists of a steel beam suspended
from the rigid frame by two (2) channels at the south end and welded to the steel beams located in the
north wall at the other end (Photo S-08). The beam supports the wood deck assembly (2” x 10” @ 12” on
center) that span from the built-up wood beam at the wall that is supported on 6” x 6” columns. The
columns bear on a 2” x 10” wood plates top and bottom. These plates are not properly fastened to the
concrete floor or to the built-up wood beam and need to be replaced (Photo S-09).

November 2018 Page 12 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

The assembly at south end walls is a braced steel frame with a wood (2” x 8” @ 12” on center) joist deck.
(Photo S-10). The frame is anchored to the masonry block wall assembly with anchors on each side of
the frame. The steel is in good condition with some light corrosion and moderately deteriorated paint.
The wood framing is in good condition with no visible signs of deterioration.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition of the steel in the supports is good however the
wood columns for the North unit are poor.
REQUIRED REPAIRS: Replace the wooden columns for the North end support structure with
steel columns. (immediately)

3.2.5 West Walkway

The existing concrete floor is in fair condition with light shrinkage cracks observed along the walkway. A
large crack was identified at the north door into the Lobby. The crack appears to be the result of frost
heave caused by the cooling system for the ice surface (Photo S-11). The middle section of the walkway
was not visible as it was covered with flooring. Large cracks were visible at the south end of the concrete
walkway that originated at the control joint and migrate perpendicular to the joint towards the ice surface
(Photo S-12). The cracks are significant with visible displacement across the crack which indicates that
they are most likely the result of frost heave.

The team benches, penalty boxes, and score keeper box are separated by masonry partition knee walls.
The masonry block is in good condition with no visible signs of cracking, spalling or deterioration.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition of the walkway is fair.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: The existing cracks should be ground down, so the transitions are
smooth. This will help to reduce the chance of tripping and falling. The
remaining shrinkage cracks are to be epoxied to prevent water and
freezing to further deteriorate the cracks. (<2yrs)
Implement annual inspections of the concrete. (immediately)

3.2.6 East Walkway

The existing concrete floor is in fair condition with light shrinkage cracks observed along the walkway.
The existing concrete at the south end has shifted which may be the result of frost heave. In addition,
transverse shrinkage cracks were observed along the walkway that propagate from ice surface to
foundation wall (Photo S-13). The existing masonry blocks are in good condition and the Hardie board
material is showing light impact damage at various locations.

November 2018 Page 13 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition of the walkway is good with some poor concrete at
the south end.
REQUIRED REPAIRS: The existing cracks should be ground down, so the transitions are
smooth. This will help to reduce the chance of tripping and falling. The
remaining shrinkage cracks are to be epoxied to prevent water and
freezing to further deteriorate the cracks. (<2yrs)
Implement annual inspections of the concrete. (immediately)

3.2.7 Mechanical Room (Ammonia Room)

The existing Mechanical Room is located at the south end of the building and is constructed from
masonry block walls with a cast-in-place concrete roof slab that is covered with a sloped wood-framed
roof assembly. The existing floor is a cast-in-place concrete slab on grade with concrete plinths
supporting the equipment.

The assessment confirmed that the roof structure is in fair condition with local sections of poor concrete
as indicated by cracking and effervescence (Photo S-14). The effervescence indicates that the original
roof assembly leaked, and water migrated through the cracks drawing out the minerals in the concrete
and depositing it on the surface. Currently the concrete roof only supports its own weight and the new
roof assembly removes the snow load from the roof as it spans to the exterior walls.

The masonry walls are in fair condition with some visible cracking observed along the north wall (Photo S-
15). The cracks do not appear to be the result of settlement, so they are not a structural concern. The
review identified moderate corrosion of the steel lintel that supports the wall over the intake stack opening
in the north wall (Photo S-16).

The existing cast-in-place concrete for the machine plinths are in fair condition. The assessment did not
identify any significant areas of spalling or deterioration in the concrete. The concrete floor had light map
cracking that was visible throughout the area. The cracks appear to originate at the floor drain and
radiate outwards. Based on the appearance and location it is our opinion that they are shrinkage cracks
and are not the result of ground movement.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition of the compressor room is fair.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: The cracking in the north masonry wall should be repointed and the
steel lintel for the intake stake should be cleaned and painted. (<2yrs)

November 2018 Page 14 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

3.2.8 South-West Storage Room

The existing storage room appears to be an addition to the original facility. This section of the building is
constructed with wood framed walls for the south and west exterior walls with masonry block interior
walls. The existing roof assembly was concealed above the OSB sheets on the ceiling and below the
corrugated steel roofing on the exterior.

The existing roof is showing signs of significant water infiltration with deteriorating ceiling sheathing and
significant black marks indicating the presence of rot (Photo S-17). The ceiling has a very low slope and
based on the permanent deflection of the interior cladding there is a strong possibility that the roof has
insufficient capacity for the accumulated snow loads.

The existing cast-in-place concrete floor slab has significant map cracking that is the result of a
combination of frost heave and shrinkage (Photo S-18). In addition, the review of the existing foundation
confirmed that it is constructed from masonry blocks that were stacked without any mortar in the joints
(Photo S-19).

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition of the storage room is poor.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: Detailed inspection of roof: remove OSB ceiling sheets and inspect roof
to determine urgency of repair/replacement. (immediately)
The complete structure needs to be removed and replaced including the
foundations and the superstructure. (<5yrs or sooner as determined by
roof inspection)

3.2.9 Zamboni Room

The existing Zamboni room is at the south end of the building located east of the Mechanical room. This
section of the building is constructed from masonry block walls that support an Open Web Steel Joist
(OWSJ) roof assembly which is concealed above OSB ceiling panels that are supported on the bottom
chords of the OWSJ (Photo S-20). The roof deck was not observed as there was no attic access.

The OSB panels show visible signs of deflection however no water damage was visible. The deflection
indicates that the grade of OSB that supports the insulation may not be suitable for the application.

The assessment of the masonry walls identified numerous cracks in the end joints of the masonry. The
cracks were located only in the joints of the block as no cracked blocks were observed. Many of these
cracks have previously been patched with caulking to reduce wind and water infiltration (Photo S-20).
Additional cracks that were not patched were also observed along the south and west walls. The existing
lintel for the overhead door was in good condition with no visible signs of distress.

November 2018 Page 15 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

The concrete floor has visible map cracking that appears to be the result of shrinkage as no vertical
displacement was noticed. There is also a significant hole in the slab that is located at the water taps,
that was the result of repairs to the plumbing. The water collection trench was in good condition however
the bottom is covered with sediment and should be cleaned out to prevent water accumulation that could
result in freeze / thaw damage.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition of the Zamboni Room is fair.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: Based on the deflection of the ceiling panels the OSB should be checked
to ensure it is the appropriate grade and replaced if it is not suitable for a
24” span. Re-point masonry block walls. Repair hole in the floor slab.
(<2yrs)
Clean out water collection trench. (immediately)

3.2.10 South East Storage Room

This section of the building is constructed from conventional steel framing with girts, beams, and columns.
The floor is a cast-in-place slab on grade concrete floor.

The review of the structural steel confirmed that is was in good condition with no significant signs of
corrosion. Some light corrosion was identified at the base of the door jams and the bottom of the interior
columns (Photo S-21). There were no visible signs of condensation issues at the time of the assessment.

The cast-in-place concrete slab on grade was in good condition with no visible cracking outside of the
control joints.

Note: We were not able to inspect the roof deck of the top of the purlin due to the presence of the thermal
barrier.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition of the structure is excellent.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: Touch up the bottom of the columns with paint to prevent further
corrosion.

3.2.11 Furnace Room

The furnace room is constructed from masonry block walls with a suspended ceiling hung from the
structural steel roof assembly. The floor is a cast-in-place concrete slab on grade.

November 2018 Page 16 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

The assessment identified an opening cut into the masonry wall above the entrance door. The opening
was installed to accommodate increased ventilation. The assessment identified step cracking in the
masonry joints along the south wall. Additionally, the exterior penetrations in the east wall were not
parged and daylight was visible through the opening (Photo S-22). Some light cracking was apparent in
the floor slab at the east end of the room (Photo S-23). No vertical deflection was observed, so these
cracks are the result of shrinkage and are not a structural concern at this time.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: Parge the exterior wall penetrations.

3.2.12 Change Rooms / Storage Room

There is a total of six (6) change rooms in the building with a small adjacent storage room. These change
rooms were all part of the building addition and are all constructed with masonry partition walls, a drywall
ceiling and a cast-in-place concrete slab on grade floor.

The assessment identified step cracking in the joints located at the ventilation duct penetrations in the
walls between the change rooms (Photo S-24). The cracks appear to be the result of shrinkage in the
wall and the lack of control joints. Currently these cracks are not a structural concern. Additional
openings were cut into the walls at the west end to allow for the installation of additional ductwork. The
openings were never properly parged or flashed, and no visible lintel was installed (Photo S-25).

The 4” thick partition wall between the change room and the showers / washroom is unsupported at the
top of the wall. Confirmation about the reinforcement and foundation for the wall is required (Photo S-26).

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition of that change rooms is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: Further structural investigation of the walls between shower/washroom
to confirm adequate reinforcement and foundation (all rooms). (<1yr)
Parge / Flash openings where ductwork was installed (all rooms).
(<2yrs)

3.2.13 Changeroom Hallway

The changeroom hallway runs north to south and is constructed from masonry blocks on the east face
and a stud partition wall clad with a Hardie board material on the west face. The floor is a cast-in-place
concrete slab on grade floor.

November 2018 Page 17 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

The masonry blocks are in good condition with no signs of deterioration. The concrete floor has some
cracking at the north end in the vicinity of the double door exit (Photo S-27). Based on the size, location,
and lack of displacement across the crack these are shrinkage cracks and are not a structural concern.
A previous patch to the floor was visible at the column in the north hallway. The concrete patch is
showing no signs of further deterioration (Photo S-28).

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: None.

3.2.14 Hall Washrooms

The washrooms for the main hall were constructed from block walls with a concrete cast-in-place
concrete slab on grade. The masonry block was in good condition with some light cracking in the corner
joints of the north-east corner of the men’s washroom and a step crack in the south east corner of the
women’s washroom (Photo S-29).

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: None.

3.2.15 Referee Change Room

The Referee Change room was originally one of the original team change rooms and is constructed from
masonry block walls, open web steel joists, steel deck ceiling, and a cast-in-place concrete slab on grade.

The masonry blocks are in fair condition with some cracking of the blocks visible at the south bearing of
the open web steel joists. Additionally, a hole in the masonry block was visible where an outlet was
previously removed (Photo S-30). The steel deck and the open web steel joists are in fair condition with
no significant corrosion visible.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition of the structure is fair.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: Parge the hole in the masonry blocks wall. (<2yrs)
Re-painting of the structural steel and treatment for the deck will be
required in a few years. (<10yrs)

3.2.16 Bar and East Stairway

The Bar is located on the south side of the main hall and is constructed from masonry block walls, open
web steel joist, steel deck ceiling, and cast-in-place concrete slab on grade. At the east end of the bar is
below the stairs that access the second floor of the building.

November 2018 Page 18 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

The steel deck and open web steel joists are in fair condition with only light corrosion visible. The
exposed face of the rigid frame is in good condition with no significant signs of corrosion visible. The
masonry blocks are in fair condition with no visible signs of cracking or deterioration.

The assessment did confirm that the east end of the header for the stairs had no column or support. The
markings on the header indicate that it may have been removed during a previous renovation (Photo S-
31).

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: Install additional support for the stairs. (immediately)

3.2.17 Main Hall Storage Room

The Main Hall Storage Room is located on the south side of the main hall and is constructed from
masonry block walls, open web steel joist, steel deck ceiling, and cast-in-place concrete slab on grade.

The steel deck and open web steel joists are in fair condition with only light corrosion visible. The
masonry blocks are in fair condition with no visible signs of cracking or deterioration. Shrinkage cracks
were visible in the floor slab but are not a structural concern.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: None.

3.2.18 Main Hall Coat Room

The Main Hall Storage Room is located on the south side of the main hall and is constructed from
masonry block walls, open web steel joist, steel deck ceiling, and cast-in-place concrete slab on grade.

The steel deck and open web steel joists are in fair condition with only light corrosion visible. The
masonry blocks are in fair condition with cracking in the joints visible at the bearing for the open web steel
joists. These cracks are not currently a structural concern.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: None.

3.2.19 Main Hall

The Main Hall is located at the north end of the building with the east end of the room being an addition
onto the original structure. The structure is constructed from masonry block walls with a suspended
ceiling hung from the structural steel rigid frame roof assembly and a cast-in-place concrete slab on grade

November 2018 Page 19 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

floor. It should be noted that the east column of the north rigid frame was removed and is now supported
by a steel beam that spans the room from North to South.

The masonry blocks were in good condition with no visible cracks at the time of the assessment. The rigid
frame assembly is in good condition with no significant signs of corrosion at the time of the assessment
and no visible deformation, buckling, or deflection noted.

The assessment did identify a depression in the floor slab at the location where the original column was
removed. A review of the flooring did not observe any signs of recent movement or settlement that was
visible in the floor tiles so the depression is currently not a structural concern.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: None

3.2.20 Kitchen / Canteen

The Kitchen / Canteen Room is located on the west end of the main hall and is constructed from masonry
block walls, and a suspended ceiling hung from the ridged frame structure with a cast-in-place concrete
slab on grade floor.

The assessment identified a significant crack over the door between the kitchen and the canteen (Photo
S-32). A review of the block confirmed that the block wall is non-load bearing and that the crack is a
result of poor block joint placement and the lack of an expansion joint in the wall. The assessment was
unable to confirm the presence of a lintel over the opening.

The review of the cast-in-place concrete slab on grade confirmed map cracking in the floor (Photo S-33).
At the time of the inspection the cracks did not have any observed vertical deflection across the crack
which suggests that these cracks are shrinkage cracks and are not a structural concern.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: Remove and replace the masonry above the door to install a suitable
expansion joint at the east side of the door and the correct lintel block
above the opening. (<2yrs)

3.2.21 Electrical Room

The Electrical room is located on the west side of the building adjacent to the kitchen / canteen. The walls
and ceiling structure were not visible because of the insulation and cladding (Photo S-34).

November 2018 Page 20 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

The assessment confirmed the presence of existing water damage in the ceiling tiles that indicate water
penetration. Further inspection of this water damage is requiring to determine if any of the secondary
structure that is concealed behind the finishes has been affected.

The review of the cast-in-place concrete slab on grade located map cracks in the floor. At the time of the
inspection to cracks did not have any vertical deflection across the crack which indicates that these
cracks are shrinkage cracks and are not a structural concern.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is fair.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: Remove all ceiling tiles to facilitate inspections of the secondary framing
structure. (immediately)

3.2.22 Lobby

The Lobby is located on the west side of the building and is adjacent to the main hall. This section of the
building is constructed from masonry block walls, open web steel joists, corrugated metal decking, with
cast-in-place concrete floor slabs.

A review of the open web steel joists confirmed that the joists that span north to south directly in front of
the main entrance and along the corridor to the main hall were significantly older in appearance then the
joists located south of the entrance doors (Photo S-35). There is a strong possibility that these joists were
reclaimed and reused from a previous structure. The joists are showing signs of corrosion with pitting
and swelling of the steel.

A significant concern is that the area above these joists is currently being used for storage which has a
significant occupancy load. Further review of these joists identified some localized deformation of the top
chord that appears to be the result of previous suspension loads (Photo S-36).

The assessment also identified the presence of white effervescence on the underside of the steel deck
which is likely zinc oxide which forms as a result of the welding process and is not a structural concern
(Photo S-35). The steel deck is in good conditions with no other signs of deterioration.

The masonry block wall is in good condition with no signs of deterioration. There is map cracking in the
cast-in-place concrete slab on grade (Photo S-37). At the time of the inspection the cracks did not have
any visible vertical deflection across the crack which suggests that these cracks are shrinkage cracks and
are not a structural concern.

November 2018 Page 21 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition of the Open Web steel joists at the entrance is fair
to poor with the remaining structure in good condition.
REQUIRED REPAIRS: Remove all storage from above the reclaimed joists (immediately) until a
detailed evaluation to confirm that the joists have the required capacity
for the continued storage occupancy load is completed. Clean and paint
all open web steel joists to prolong anticipated life span. (<2yrs)

3.2.23 Lobby Utility Room

The Lobby utility room is located on the east side of the lobby and is adjacent to the main hall. This
section of the building is constructed from masonry block walls, open web steel joists, corrugated metal
decking, with cast-in-place concrete floor slabs.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: None.

3.2.24 Lobby Storage Room and West Stairway

The Lobby storage room located on the west side of the lobby under the stairs to the second floor of the
structure. This section of the building is constructed from masonry block walls, open web steel joists,
corrugated metal decking, with cast-in-place concrete floor slabs.

A review of the supports for the stair header confirmed that the west end of the header is supported by a
column, but the east end of the header is not supported by any structure (Photo S-38). The west column
appears to be a retrofit to the structure and is lightly corroded. The base plate for the column is not
fastened into the concrete and the floor shows no sign that indicates the presence of a footing below the
column (Photo S-39). The east end of the header shows no sign of support and is not bearing on the
adjacent block wall.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good however the status of the stairs is poor.
REQUIRED REPAIRS: Install appropriate supports for the stair header. (immediately)

3.2.25 Lobby Washrooms

The lobby has a men’s and a women’s washroom that are both constructed from masonry block walls,
open web steel joists, corrugated metal decking, with cast-in-place concrete floor slabs.

The assessment of the men’s washroom identified missing face shells for the masonry block and cracking
of the vertical joints between the blocks along the top of the wall (Photo S-40). The remainder of the
blocks were in good condition with no visible cracks of concern at the time of the assessment. Our review

November 2018 Page 22 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

also identified cracks is the floor slab that were identified as shrinkage cracks. These cracks are not a
structural concern.

The assessment of the women’s washroom confirmed the masonry blocks were in good condition with no
visible cracks of concern at the time of the assessment. Our review also identified cracks is the floor slab
that were identified as shrinkage cracks. These cracks do not appear to be a structural concern at this
time.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: None

3.2.26 North Viewing Hall

The North Viewing Hall is located at the south end of the lobby under the second floor of the structure.
This section of the building is constructed from masonry block walls, open web steel joists, corrugated
metal decking, steel beams, and steel columns with a cast-in-place concrete floor slab.

The assessment of the area was unable to review the condition of the steel as it was concealed behind
the finishes. At the time of the review, the finishes did not indicate any signs of permanent or temporary
deflection. The exposed face of the rigid frame was in good condition.

The masonry blocks were in good condition with no visible cracks at the time of the assessment. The
open web steel joists and steel deck were in good condition with some localized corrosion of the decking
visible at the lap joints.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: None

3.2.27 East / West Stairwell

The masonry blocks were in good condition with no observed cracks at the time of the assessment. The
steel stairs were in good condition with some localized corrosion but no significant structural concerns at
the time of the assessment.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: None

3.2.28 Upstairs Viewing Area

The upstairs viewing area is located at the north end of the ice surface. The structure is constructed from
masonry block walls with a suspended ceiling hung from the structural steel rigid frame roof assembly.

November 2018 Page 23 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

The floor is a cast-in-place concrete slab on steel deck. It should be noted that the rigid frame and the
floor slab were not assessed as they were concealed behind finishes.

The masonry blocks were in good condition however the masonry blocks over the window (1/2 course
height) appear to have shifted inwards with a visible crack along at the bottom of the lintel over the
window (Photo S-41). The review on the exterior side of the window indicates that these blocks appear to
be infill and were likely installed when the windows were replaced. (Photo S-42).

The review of the canteen / bar area confirmed that there is a visible deflection of the frame of the server
opening (Photo S-43). The assessment of the block did not identify any cracking that would suggest a
structural concern with the lintel however additional inspection is recommended to determine if
reinforcement of the block is required or if the trim has crept over time.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: Further investigation to assess masonry block wall structure and
removal of flashing on the ice surface face of the windows to determine
how the windows are anchored to ensure safety. (immediately)

3.2.29 Upstairs Storage Area

The upstairs storage area is located at the north end of the structure and is directly over the lobby. The
structure is constructed from masonry block walls with a cast-in-place concrete slab on steel deck that is
supported on open web steel joists discussed previously. It should be noted that the rigid frame above
the kitchen and the Main Hall were visible from this location.

The masonry blocks and the exposed rigid frame were in good condition with no signs of structural
deterioration (Photo S-44). The secondary structure including bracing and purlins were also in good
condition with no significant corrosion visible at the time of the assessment.

A review of the occupancy confirmed that there is a significant volume of storage in the area that is
supported by what appears to be reclaimed open web steel. As previously recommended the storage in
this area should be removed until the suitability of the open web steel joists is confirmed.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: Remove the all items stored in this area until the capacity of the floor
system is confirmed. (immediately)

November 2018 Page 24 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

3.2.30 Assembly Hall Entrance Vestibule

The structure for the vestibule was concealed behind architectural finishes however no visible signs of
movement of deflection was noted.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: None.

3.2.31 Main Entrance Vestibule

The Vestibule is the primary entrance into the Lobby and Arena and is located on the east side at the
north end of the building. The structure for the vestibule was in excellent condition with no signs of
deterioration to the block, or foundation walls. The roof structure was concealed behind architectural
finishes however no visible signs of movement of deflection was noted. A large crack was identified
where the exterior slab bears on the foundation wall at the North doors. This crack is the result of
movement of the exterior slab (frost heave, or settlement) but is not a structural concern.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is good.

REQUIRED REPAIRS: None.

3.2.32 Building Exterior

The exterior of the building, except for the Zamboni and Mechanical rooms, are metal siding above the
cast-in-place concrete foundations. The visible section of the foundation wall appears to be in good
condition with some light vertical cracking observed.

The exterior block walls located at the Mechanical room are in fair condition with some visible spalling
and deterioration of the blocks on the south face of the wall. The assessment of the shelter over the fuel
tank confirmed that it does not meet code requirements and should be removed and/or replaced (Photo
S-45).

The exterior of the Zamboni room is in poor condition. The masonry blocks have significant cracking,
spalling and deterioration along all the faces of the structure (Photo S-46). The assessment also noted
displaced blocks over the window opening which indicate potential structural failure of the lintel (Photo S-
47).

The steel frame supporting the cooling tower is in fair condition with poor sections resulting from
significant corrosion and swelling of the steel. In addition, localized delamination of the steel was also
noted (Photo S-48). The concrete supports for the frame are in fair condition with no structural concerns.

November 2018 Page 25 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

The HVAC steel frame at the north end of the facility is in fair condition with some light corrosion visible.
The assessment did confirm that the frame is not currently anchored into the cast-in-place concrete pad.
The concrete pad is in good condition with no visible signs of damage from frost or settlement (Photo S-
49).

The North vestibule entrance slab is in poor condition with a significant crack that spans from east to west
with visible displacement which indicates soil movement (Photo S-50). The exterior slab at the east
vestibule is in good condition with no structural concerns.

OVERALL CONDITION: The overall condition is exterior facility is good with some poor sections.
REQUIRED REPAIRS: Based on the extent of the deterioration of the exterior walls of the
Zamboni Room a complete replacement of the superstructure for this
room is recommended. (<2yrs)
The shelter for the fuel tank should be replaced. (<2yrs)
The steel for the cooling tower and HVAC should be cleaned and
painted. (<2yrs)
The structure for the north HVAC unit should be anchored to the
concrete slab. (immediately)
The slab outside of the north vestibule should be replaced. (<5yrs)

November 2018 Page 26 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

3.3 MECHANICAL
The Mechanical inspection was carried out on August 30, 2018.

3.3.1 Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC)

3.3.1.1 Description of HVAC Systems

The building HVAC system consists of several split air-handling units located throughout the building to
condition common spaces and utility spaces, as well as a large 10-ton packaged air handling unit located
outside that serves the assembly hall and kitchen area. The following list describe the HVAC zones
within the building and what equipment serves those areas:

HVAC Zone Summary

Zone Description Equipment
1 North End 2nd Floor FU1, HP1
2 East Changeroom Wing (1) FU2, HP2
3 East Changeroom Wing (2) FU3, HP3
4 North End 1st Floor RTU1
5 Arena HP1, HP2, HP3

Please refer to Appendix D for HVAC Equipment Summary.

HVAC equipment for Zones 1 and 2 is located on the ground floor north-east mechanical room with the
heat pump located in the Arena area. The air handler for Zone 3 is located in the attic on the second floor
with the heat pump located in the Arena area. There does not appear to be any outdoor air ventilation for
these zones.

The HVAC system for the north end first floor (Zone 4) has been recently upgraded with the installation of
a new 10-ton packaged air handling unit located outside. The supply air has been re-configured and the
return air is located on the wall adjacent to the HVAC unit.

The Arena area is passively cooled by the ice surface cooling system. In addition to this, the outdoor
heat pump units that heat and cool the common spaces (Zones 1, 2 and 3) in the winter are located in the
arena to provide heat reclamation. Ventilation and free cooling/heating for the Arena area is provided by
two wall mounted exhaust fans and manually operated intake louvres. Make-up air for the space is from
several louvres to the attic space and wall vents to the outside.

November 2018 Page 27 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

3.3.1.2 Arena

The current HVAC system for the Zones 1, 2, and 3 provides heat to these spaces by using heat pumps
located in the Arena space. In heating mode, this provides a more favorable temperature for the heat
pumps to operate in, and the arena air is further cooled. However, in cooling mode the compressors will
transfer heat from the Zone 1/2/3 spaces into the Arena space. This arrangement is acceptable, however
the only source of outdoor ventilation air is via the wall mounted exhaust fans. The current building code
requires constant ventilation to maintain indoor air quality. Currently, the exhaust fans cannot be operated
continuously without overcooling or overheating the space which can create indoor air quality issues. In
addition to this, the make-up air for the space is pulled from the attic, which presents an unacceptable air
quality issue with insulation, dirt and dust being introduced into the arena space (Photo M-01)

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• It is recommended that an ERV (energy recovery ventilator) be installed in the arena with
auxiliary cooling and heating in lieu of the existing wall mounted exhaust fans. (<2yrs)

3.3.1.3 East Changeroom Wing

The HVAC systems for Zones 1, 2 and 3 are old and do not provide ventilation or the appropriate exhaust
to the spaces and should be re-designed and replaced immediately. The exhaust system for the
changerooms and washrooms is currently not compliant with the latest version of the Ontario Building
Code. According to section 6.2.3.8 (8): all exhaust should independently discharge to outdoors, or be
combined at the exhaust fan/ERV. Currently, there is no outdoor ventilation or exhaust for these spaces.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• It is recommended that FU1 and FU2 be replaced with an ERV. The ERV can provide
tempered outdoor air into the corridor and exhaust air from each changeroom can be
combined in a plenum box with backdraft dampers in the ceiling space. (<2yrs)

3.3.1.4 North End

The interior spaces between the Arena and Lobby/Hall do not have any source of ventilation as the
diffusers that feed these areas have been disconnected and abandoned (Photo M-02 typ.). Ventilation air
is required in all occupiable rooms of the building. Furthermore, none of the Washrooms in the North End
of the building have exhaust air.

The air handling unit located in the attic is in the same space as the attic insulation and presents an air
quality issue that should be addressed immediately (Photo M-02).

The kitchen does not have adequate exhaust for the size. A proper kitchen hood with an exhaust fan and
make-up air unit is required to comply with the latest version of the OBC.

November 2018 Page 28 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

Overall, the air quality in the building is poor which could be explained by the lack of ventilation and not
operating RTU1 during unoccupied hours. The air handling unit located in the attic is in the same space
as the attic insulation and presents an air quality issue that should be addressed immediately.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Provide new ducting to supply air from RTU1 into the rooms between the Assembly Hall /
Lobby and the north rink-side corridor with return air provided via door undercuts and
transfer grilles where necessary. (immediately)
• Abandoned HVAC equipment should be removed from the building. (immediately)
• Construct a service room for unit FU1. (immediately)
• Provide new stand-alone exhaust fans for all north end washrooms that discharge out the
side of the building. (immediately)
• Provide a new kitchen exhaust hood and make-up air unit. (<5yrs)
• It is recommended that the outdoor package unit (RTU1) be operated periodically
throughout the day during unoccupied periods to maintain good indoor air quality.
(immediately)

3.3.1.5 South End

The south-west storage/mechanical room does not appear to have any source of heat (Photo M-03).

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Provide a unit heater in the SW Storage/Mechanical room. (immediately)

3.3.1.6 HVAC General

The diffusers throughout the facility appear to be very dirty.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Change Filters and have ducts cleaned. (immediately)
• It is recommended that a commercial dehumidifier be installed in the arena area to prevent
condensation on building surfaces and on the heat pumps. (Optional)
• Insulate supply ducts on the exterior and interior of the building for all HVAC system to
prevent condensation. (<5yrs)

3.3.2 Plumbing

3.3.2.1 Description of Plumbing Systems

The domestic water system in the building consists of one ½ HP submersible well-pump located in a
drilled well at the north-west side of the building and a ¾ HP jet pump located in the south mechanical
room fed from the dug well at the east side of the building. The jet pump feeds one small well tank. The

November 2018 Page 29 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

system feeds the compressor cooling system and the hot water tank in the adjacent mechanical room that
is used for the Zamboni.

The submersible pump in the north-west mechanical room feeds the rest of the building including the
kitchen, changeroom and washrooms. The pump feeds a single well tank and then is distributed to the
rest of the building through the floor and ceiling space.

The Sanitary system in the building was difficult to assess since it is mostly below grade. From what
could be seen, the system is designed and installed properly, except in a few cases where there is
appears to be no venting.

Refer to Appendix D for an equipment list.

3.3.2.2 Observations and Recommendations

The domestic water piping is in good condition; however the domestic water demand should be analyzed
to determine if the well tanks are properly sized to prevent short cycling of the pump. Several pieces of
equipment in the domestic water system are old and should be replaced within the next 5 years. There
are several areas where backflow preventers and mixing valves should be installed for safety.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

• Replace existing pumps P1 and P2 prior to the end of service life (age unverified). (<5yrs)

• Replace pressure switches for pump control as it has reached the end of service life.
(<2yrs)

• Replace well tanks including pressure valves and gauges as they have reached the end of
service life. It is recommended that a large 120USGAL well tank be installed in the south
mechanical room to replace TK2. (<5yrs)

• Provide backflow preventers on the compressor cooling system to prevent contamination

of the domestic water supply and to comply with OBC and local codes. (immediately)

• A thermostatic mixing valve should be installed on all domestic how water tanks to
prevent scalding. (immediately)

• All hot water tanks in the building appear to be reaching the end of their service life. To
prevent unexpected failure, or damage to the building with leaks, it is recommended that
they be replaced within the next 2 years.

The kitchen hot water tank HWT5 should be replaced with a high efficiency propane model
for energy savings. The hot water demand for the kitchen should be re-analyzed to
determine if the size should be increased. The prep area hot water tank HWT4 should be
November 2018 Page 30 of 52
Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

removed and a hot water line fed from the north-east mechanical room. HWT2 and HWT3
should be replaced with a large 100USGAL high efficiency propane hot water tank. The
venting for the existing tanks is not to code and should not be combined (Photos M-03 and
M-04).

The hot water tank for the Zamboni in the south mechanical room (HWT1) should be
replace immediately with a high efficiency propane model. (<2yrs)

• Hot water piping in the building should be insulated for energy efficiency. (Optional)

• A floor drain should be provided in the south mechanical room where HWT1 is located.
Local environmental codes should be consulted to determine if the water treatment
chemicals are safe to dispose of in the facility septic system. A holding tank for overflow
may be required for the condenser water overflow. (immediately)

• The floor drain in the north-east mechanical room appears to have a capped vent pipe that
should be corrected. The dishwasher drain also appears to be unvented and should be
corrected. (immediately)

• Provide heat tracing on the heat pump drain pans for additional safety and efficiency and
to prevent freezing. (<5yrs)

• Some of the domestic water piping in the south mechanical room appears to be
galvanized. This should be replaced with copper to prevent damage to equipment fed by
these pipes (immediately)

November 2018 Page 31 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

3.4 ELECTRICAL
The Electrical inspection was carried out on August 30, 2018.

3.4.1 SERVICES AND MAIN DISTRIBUTION

3.4.1.1 Fault Current

The pole-mount transformers serving the Arena and North Diamond are 3 x 50kVA = 150kVA (1.81%
impedance) with 600Y/347V secondary service voltage. Fault current is limited below 7.8kA and is
therefore not a concern.

3.4.1.2 Pole Line

The property is served by a customer-owned 3-phase 4-wire (WYE) high-voltage overhead lines sourced
from the Grey County Road 3 distribution line to the west of the property (pole-mount transformers are
owned by Hydro One). The private lines are isolated by fused cut-outs at the tap. There is one Hydro
One metered service. The ball-diamond sports-lighting is fed from the Arena building.

Both of the two wood poles are showing signs of age. The transformers are wrapped in a tangle of dead
vines. Two lightning arrestors have failed. The dip/dead-end pole at the Arena is missing yellow guy
guards (for safety/visibility). Although the guy wire is very close to the fence and thus protected, it is
advisable to install a high-vis guard to meet Code. (Photo E-01)

RECOMMENDATIONS – Pole Line:

• Contact Hydro One Networks Inc. to replace lightning arrestors on their pole-mount
transformers. (immediately)
• Add guy guard to dead-end pole at Arena. (immediately)
• Remove vines (dead or alive). (immediately)
• Replace two older poles. (<10yrs)

3.4.1.3 Arena Service

The Arena building is served by a 3-phase cluster of single-phase pole-mount transformers located near
the SW corner of the building. The service secondaries are 3-phase 3-wire 2/phase steel-messenger-
supported overhead insulated wires strung to a mast affixed to the Mechanical/Eletrical (Ammonia) room.
The wiring transitions to 3 TECK cables at the top of the mast using bare compression connectors.
Metering is located at this entry point on the Arena building: interior metering cabinet, exterior meter.
The insulation on the overhead secondary conductors is deteriorating (Photo E-02).

November 2018 Page 32 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

The Arena service is 400A 600V 3-phase. The capacity is therefore assumed to be 333kVA at 80%.
Hydro bills from the past year indicate a maximum demand of around 112kVA, suggesting that there is
sufficient capacity.

RECOMMENDATIONS – Arena Service:

• Replace: overhead service secondary conductors, connectors, and TECK cables to
service switch. (<2yrs)

3.4.1.4 Bonding and Grounding

NB: Observations are limited to visible components.

The system appears to be grounded to the water main. The ground connection is ahead of several pipe
connections and an apparent transition from copper to a section of galvanized material and therefore the
resistance to ground is suspect.

Some of the original distribution relied upon conduit connections for bonding. Three feeders have
subsequently been equipped with equipment bonding conductors install along the outside of the conduit.

RECOMMENDATIONS – Bonding and Grounding:

• Install a new artificial ground electrode system. (<2yrs)

3.4.2 DISTRIBUTION

3.4.2.1 Arena Distribution - General

There is one main Electrical/Mechanical room (Ammonia room) located at the south end of the building in
an ancillary building section. There are two additional secondary Electrical/Mechanical rooms: one in the
East Changeroom Wing and another in the NW corner of the building. The electrical distribution consists
principally of fused switches and splitter troughs.

Some of the distribution equipment appears to be original (1974) and is reaching end-of-useful-life (Photo
E-14, typical older switch). Branch circuits are supplied by moulded-case circuit breaker (MCCB)
panelboards (typically old Federal Pioneer Stab-Loc panels, one Eaton QO panel). Some conductors
appear to be original (1974) and are approaching end-of-useful-life. Other conductors are newer. All
visible interior conductors appear to be in good condition.

There are materials stored in front of, and on, electrical distribution equipment in all three electrical
rooms, which is a Code working space violation. A clear space minimum 1m is required in front of low
voltage equipment and the enclosures should not be used as shelving. (Photos E-15, E-21, E-22, E-23,
typical)

November 2018 Page 33 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

There was no apparent Electrical Single-Line Diagrams in the Electrical/Mechanical Rooms. There were
no warning signs regarding risk of Electric Shock or Arc Flash in the electrical rooms except for the Hydro
One metering cabinet and the Changeroom Electrical room.

RECOMMENDATIONS – Arena Distribution - General:

• Clear loose stored items from in front of, and on, electrical distribution equipment (1m
clearance). (immediately)
• Add labels to indicate Authorized Personnel Only and warnings of Electrical Shock;
(immediately)
• Add visible single-line diagrams to the Electrical/Mechanical rooms (3); (immediately)
• Replace old splitters, old disconnects, old panelboards, and associated wiring, raceway,
and supports in the medium term; (<10yrs)

3.4.2.2 Arena Distribution – Exterior

The outdoor receptacle used for the vending machine on the North wall would be better served with an in-
use style weatherproof receptacle cover.

The penetrations at the North end of the West wall (well pump and ball-diamond feeder) are unsealed
(Photo E-04).

One of the sports-lighting masts appears to have exposed wire-nut connections at the top (Photo E-05).

One of the sports-lighting masts has a broken conduit connection at the base (Photo E-06).

The branch circuit conduit to the cooling tower is exposed and severely rusted (Photo E-07).

The outdoor light on the Zamboni Room has an indoor device box (Photo E-08).

The East wall has a couple of unsealed penetrations (well-pump circuit?) and at oil fill/vent pipes (Photos
E-09 and E-10).

The wall-pack on the east wall has a broken mount (Photo E-30).

The North HVAC unit (RTU1) appears to have exposed flexible cord not suitable for outdoor use (Photo
E-11).

RECOMMENDATIONS – Arena Distribution – Exterior:

• Replace vending machine outdoor receptacle cover with in-use type. (immediately)
• Seal penetrations of exterior wall. (immediately)
• Repair broken conduit and exposed connections of sports-lighting masts. (immediately)
• Replace conduit and conductor to Cooling Tower (>2yrs)
• Replace device boxes / mounts for outdoor lighting wall-packs. (immediately)

November 2018 Page 34 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

• Replace control wiring to RTU1 with wiring method suitable for a wet location.
(immediately)

3.4.2.3 Arena Distribution – South End

The roof of the South-West utility room appears to be failing with signs of water ingress. The electrical
equipment in the room is not weather-proofed and is therefore compromised. There is an exposed
control box on the hot-water tank (Photo E-12), a loose box and AC90 (BX) cable behind it (Photo E-16),
and loose boxes next to the Electrical/Mechanical (Ammonia) room door (E-13).

The unit heater in the Main Electrical/Mechanical room appears to be at end-of-useful life. The unit
heater in the Zamboni room has been Jerry-rigged with a desk-top fan, presumably due to failure of the
integral fan, and this is not a safe arrangement (Photos E-19 and E-20). The SW Utility Room has no
apparent heater but has domestic water systems subject to freezing.

RECOMMENDATIONS – Arena Distribution – South End:

• Repair/replace SW Utility Room – refer to Structural and Architectural Sections.
(immediately)
• Secure loose boxes/cable in SW Utility Room. (immediately)
• Replace unit heaters in Zamboni Room, Mechanical Room, and add a unit heater to the SW
Utility room. (immediately)

3.4.2.4 Arena Distribution – Rink Area

The time-keeper booth light fixture has flexible equipment cord used as permanent wiring (stapled to wall)
in contravention with Code (Photo E-24)

The HVAC mezzanine in the north-west corner has loose wiring (Photo E-25).

RECOMMENDATIONS – Arena Distribution – Rink Area:

• Replace equipment cord in Time-Keeper booth with proper wiring method to meet Code.
(<2yrs)
• Remove redundant wiring and secure wiring still-in-use at HVAC mezzanine in the NW
corner of the rink. (immediately)

3.4.2.5 Arena Distribution – East Changeroom Wing

The East Changeroom Wing is newer and this is reflected in the good condition of the electrical
equipment.

3.4.2.6 Arena Distribution – North End

The condition of the electrical equipment in the North Section of the building was generally good. Some
of the equipment and wiring is nearing end-of-useful-life – refer to Section above “Arena Distribution –
November 2018 Page 35 of 52
Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

General”. The Lobby Utility room has device boxes on the north wall missing knock-outs in contravention
of Code.

RECOMMENDATIONS – Arena Distribution – North End:

• Fill knock-outs in Lobby Utility room device boxes. (immediately)

3.4.3 LIGHTING

3.4.3.1 Exterior Lighting

See also: Section above “Arena Distribution – Exterior”.

The ball diamond features six (6) sports-lighting masts. The sports lighting towers around the ball
diamond were inspected from grade level only, and not at night and therefore these observations
are thus limited in scope (failed lamps would be simple to observe by any maintenance staff).

Exterior lighting wall-packs are in poor condition (Photos E-08, E-28, E-30). Some Main Entrance
Canopy lights are dirty (Photo E-29).

RECOMMENDATIONS – Exterior Building Security Lighting:

• Further investigation of lightning protection system for the Sports-Lighting masts.
(immediately)
• Replace all in the short term. (<2yrs)
• Clean Entrance Canopy lights. (immediately)

3.4.3.2 Interior Lighting – South End

Lighting levels in the SW Utility Room, Main Mechanical room, and the Zamboni room – provided by
medium-edison-socket compact fluorescent bulbs - is poor. Guarded lamps would be more suitable for
these spaces to protect against impact damage.

RECOMMENDATIONS – South End Interior Lighting:

• Replace SW Utility room, Mechanical room, and Zamboni room lighting suitably protected
and to produce adequate lighting levels. (<2yrs)

3.4.3.3 Interior Lighting – Rink Area

The rink lighting consists of 32 4-lamp T8 linear fluorescent fixtures in a 4 x 8 grid. The lighting appears
to be adequate and in good condition. One fixture appeared to have failed (lamps or ballast).

3.4.3.4 Interior Lighting - Change Room Wing

The East Changeroom Wing features newer T8 linear fluorescent lighting. The 3 rd and 4th rooms from the
south have poor lighting levels (linear fluorescent) and should have a single fixture added. The large

November 2018 Page 36 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

South-East Storage room also has poor lighting levels (large compact flluorescent) and would be better
served (efficiency and performance) by a linear fluorescent or LED system.

RECOMMENDATIONS – Change Room Wing Interior Lighting:

• Add one fixture to each room: 3rd and 4th rooms from south end of corridor. (<5yrs)
• Replace or augment lighting in SE Storage room. (<2yrs)

3.4.3.5 Interior Lighting – North End

Lighting in the Lobby Storage room (under west stairs), the Lobby Utility room, and the Second Floor Attic
Storage space are provided by bare bulbs, which are subject to impact damage.

The Washrooms off the Assembly Hall had lower lighting level than perhaps desirable.

The Second Floor Viewing Area and the East stairwell were dimly lit.

RECOMMENDATIONS – North End Interior Lighting:

• Replace lighting with system suitably protected and to produce adequate lighting levels in
in Storage/Utility rooms. (<2yrs).
• Add a fixture to each Hall Washroom (Men’s, Women’s) to enhance lighting level.
(Optional)
• Replace lighting in Second Floor Viewing Area with better light levels, provide controls to
avoid glare on glass and to facilitate adjustment of light level to suit activity. (Optional)
• Replace lighting in the East Stairwell to provide adequate (safe) normal lighting level.
(immediately)

November 2018 Page 37 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

3.4.4 Exit Signs and Emergency Lighting

The following table indicates the status of emergency lighting and exit signs in each room:

Emergency Lighting and Exit Sign Deficiencies

Room Emergency Lighting Exit Signs

SW Utility Room No No
Mechanical Room No, n/a
Zamboni Room No n/a
Rink Area Yes, but inadequate. Yes
SE Storage Room Yes Yes
Changeroom Corridor Yes Yes, but inadequate.
Changerooms & Storage Room No n/a
East Mech/Elect Room No n/a
East Exit Corridor Yes Yes
Rink North End Corridor No Yes, but inadequate
Lobby No No
Main Entrance Vestibule Yes n/a
Lobby Washrooms No n/a
Lobby Storage & Utility n/a n/a
Kitchen No No
Vending n/a n/a
Assembly Hall Bar, Storage n/a n/a
Referee/Staff Washroom No No
Assembly Hall Washroom Corridor No No
Assembly Hall Washrooms No n/a
NW Mech/Elect Room No n/a
West Stairway Yes Yes
East Stairway No n/a
Upstairs Viewing Area Yes, but inadequate Yes
Upstairs Washrooms No n/a
Upstairs Storage No No

“No” means that no fixture was present but is required,

“n/a’ means not required,
“Yes” means that fixture(s) currently exist and are acceptable or deficient as specifically indicated.

RECOMMENDATIONS – Emergency Lighting and Exit Signs

• Add emergency lighting where indicated insufficient or missing in the table above.
Replace faulty lamps.
• Add Exit Signs in areas where indicated insufficient or missing in the table above.

November 2018 Page 38 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

3.5 CIVIL
The Septic System inspection was carried out on Thursday September 6, 2018.

3.5.1 Septic System

3.5.1.1 Tank Arrangement

The septic tank and pumping chamber servicing the Keady Arena are located along the East wall
approximately centered North-South and 15m from the building. The tank and pumping chamber are
buried under approximately 1.0m of fill. The tank and pumping chamber are both constructed of
concrete.
The tank has an estimated capacity of 32,500l or approximately 7000 Imperial gallons.

3.5.1.2 Observed Tank Contents

The first chamber did have some sludge accumulation and there was a thin soft scum layer observed, but
is not yet approaching 33% of its volume being occupied by solids (scum and sludge) and accordingly,
does not need to be pumped for at least 2 or 3 years. In observing the sludge, there were no indications
that products know to be harmful to septic systems have been used. There were several small plastic
bottle lids, toys, hygiene products and plastic wrappers floating on the surface of the scum. These items
should not be in the system, efforts should be increased to prevent these items from being disposed of in
the system. The second chamber does not have any scum at surface and very little fine sludge at the
bottom.

3.5.1.3 Observed Tank Condition

The walls of the septic tank felt smooth, showing no indications of premature erosion and are considered
in very good condition. The walls of the pumping chamber are also smooth, and in good condition with no
sign of concrete degradation. The baffles in the tank are solid and secure, inlet and outlet baffles are PVC
plastic, and appropriately sized for the tank volume.

3.5.1.4 Leaching Bed

The leaching bed is located directly east of the tank and pumping chamber and runs parallel to the Arena.
The bed is approximately 10m from the building and is raised above the surrounding grade by
approximately 2m. The elevated nature of the bed would suggest imported filter sand was used to
construct the filter bed - keeping its size more a manageable 10m wide by 60m long. The bed does not
have any stripes visible and no highly nitrified grasses. The biggest threat facing this beds long term
health would be erosion of the soils, exposing the piping infrastructure. The vegetation covering the bed
appeared very healthy and thick, so no concern at this time.

November 2018 Page 39 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

3.5.1.5 Normal Expected Useful Life

Class 4 Septic Systems are generally expected to last 25 to 40 years when used regularly. The Single
class 4 system appears to be in very good shape, and is estimated to be 15 years old, though no date
stamp was observed on the tanks at inspection.

3.5.1.6 Water Well

The facility is serviced by a 6” drilled well which is located approximately 78m away from the closest
component of the sewage system. The dug well for the ice making equipment is 48m from the closest
component of the septic system, both are well in excess of the minimum 15m separation.

RECOMMENDATIONS – Septic System

• Tanks and pumping chamber are in good condition.
• Solids are under ~33%, and so septic tank should not need pumping for 3-5 years.
• If alterations to building or water system undertaken, then a detailed investigation of the
leaching bed is recommended, including sample excavation and video camera inspection.
• Perform periodic inspections of tanks and leaching bed.
• Based on the current trajectory, no capital expenditures are anticipated in the next 10
years except for pump replacements (refer to Mechanical Sections).

November 2018 Page 40 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

4.0 PROPOSED BUILDING UPGRADES &

ASSOCIATED COSTS
The following pages contain a detailed prioritized list of recommended capital improvements along with
our opinion of probable cost for each.

The recommended capital improvements are required, in our opinion, to maintain the integrity of the
facility. Each item is prioritized with a letter-code as described in the table below.

Estimated capital costs are in 2018 dollars. The costs do not include soft costs which may be incurred
such as professional fees, taxes, insurance, permits, etc. Any cost estimates provided are subject to
confirmation or adjustment at the time competitive bids are obtained from contractors who specialize in
the various items of repair work required.

RECOMMENDED BUILDING UPGRADES - PRIORITY CODES

Priority Priority Action Description of
Letter Level Required Priority Level

A Critical Immediately Deficiencies representing unacceptable health and

safety risks and must be corrected immediately.

B High < 2 years Functional deficiencies, second-tier health and safety

concerns, and conditions which are expected to lead to
the failure of building elements in the short to medium
term. In some instances, the conditions should be
investigated to confirm the necessity of corrective
action.

C Deferred 2 - 5 Years Systems reaching end-of-useful-life and deficiencies

that may cause impairment of building function or
acceleration of wear.

D Deferred 5-10 Years Systems reaching end-of-useful-life and deficiencies

that may cause impairment of building function or
acceleration of wear.

E Optional n/a Suggested discretionary Improvements: function,

efficiency, aesthetics.

November 2018 Page 41 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

November 2018 Page 42 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

November 2018 Page 43 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

November 2018 Page 44 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

November 2018 Page 45 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

November 2018 Page 46 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

November 2018 Page 47 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

5.0 CONCLUSIONS & CRITICAL PRIORITIES

5.1 CRITICAL DEFICIENCIES
The highest priority items (Priority Rating A in the preceding Tables) should be undertaken immediately
and are summarized as follows. Cost Estimate: $94,300 excl. tax and permits.
• Investigate water damage in NW Electrical/Mechanical room - to prevent further damage.
• Install roof membrane to seal the chase above the Compressor room - to prevent water ingress
and resultant damage and slip hazards.
• Seal pipe channel between Mechanical (Ammonia) room and the Rink space – to isolate
Ammonia room and to protect from water ingress.
• Replace wood columns supporting HVAC Condenser in north-east corner of the rink space with
steel columns – to provide proper structural support.
• Investigate South-West Storage/Mechanical room roof (remove OSB sheets) – to determine
urgency of repair/replacement of roof.
• Further structural analysis of the masonry block walls between changerooms and showers – to
determine structural adequacy.
• Install structural steel post at the east end of the East Stairwell – to provide proper structural
support.
• Install structural steel post at East End of Stairs and Anchor West post into the floor slab - to
provide proper structural support.
• Remove all stored materials above the Lobby because of poor condition of floor assembly joists –
to prevent structural failure.
• Further investigate masonry block above Viewing Area windows (temp. remove flashing) - to
determine adequacy of structure / safety of window support.
• Anchor North HVAC unit (RTU1) into concrete slab – to provide proper structural support. Provide
stand-alone exhaust fans for all washrooms in the North End (ie. Lobby washrooms, Assembly
Hall washrooms, and Referee Change Room) – to ensure adequate indoor air quality.
• Modify the RTU1 supply ducting to supply air to the Storage rooms, Bar etc. between the
Lobby/Assembly Hall and the north rink-area corridor with return air provided by door undercuts
and transfer grilles – to ensure adequate indoor air quality.
• Replace filters and clean ducts - to ensure adequate indoor air quality.
• Renovate the North End attic space to house the air-handling unit (FU1) such that it does not
draw air from the batt insulated attic - to ensure adequate indoor air quality.
• Provide a unit heater in the South-West Storage/Mechanical room – to prevent pipe freezing.
• Provide backflow preventers for the Ice Plant compressor cooling circuit and the condenser
make-up water – to prevent contamination of the well.
• Provide thermostatic mixing valves on all hot water tanks – to prevent scalding.
• Provide a floor drain in the South-West Storage/Mechanical room – to prevent flooding and slip
hazards.

November 2018 Page 48 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment
• Install a proper vent in the dishwasher drain – to permit proper draining.
• Replace galvanized piping with copper in the Mechanical (Ammonia) room – to prevent damage
to equipment from rusting pipes.
• Add high visibility guy guard to the dip pole – to prevent pedestrian collisions.
• Remove vines from around transformers – to prevent flash-overs.
• Clear loose stored items from in front of electrical panels (and shut-off valves) – to conform to
Code; to prevent tripping hazards and to provide ready access to breakers (and valves) for
emergency/urgent shut-off.
• Add warning labels – to warn of electric shock.
• Replace Unit Heaters in SW Utility room, Main Mechanical room, and Zamboni room – to prevent
burn-out of old units and to prevent pipe freezing in Utility room.
• Fix loose wiring in NW HVAC mezzanine – to prevent trip hazards and shock hazards.
• Fill knock-outs in device boxes in Lobby Utility room, and provide cover for controller on SW
Utility room hot water tank (HWT1) – to prevent accidental contact with live parts.
• Replace lighting in East Stairwell – to provide safe normal-lighting levels.
• Install additional emergency lights and exit signs where deficient – to ensure safe emergency
egress.

November 2018 Page 49 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

5.2 COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Our Building Condition Assessment identified a significant number of architectural, structural, mechanical
and electrical deficiencies of varying urgency. Critical priority items are highlighted in the previous
Subsection, 5.1. Refer to Sections 3 and 4 for a complete list of recommended building repairs and
upgrades, including itemized opinions of cost. The following table summarizes the estimated costs per
priority level.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY TABLE

Priority Priority Action Required Opinion of Cost 1
Letter Level

A Critical Immediately $94,300

B High < 2 yrs $376,400

C Deferred 2 - 5 yrs $246,800

D Deferred 5 – 10 yrs $850,000

E Optional n/a $171,100

TOTAL $1,738,100

1 The Opinion of Cost is a “Class D” estimate, it excludes non-construction costs; for example, design
fees, permit fees, and taxes. Refer also to sub-section 5.4 “NEXT STEPS AND COMMENTARY”.

The original building section has reached 44 years of service. Significant expenditures for replacement or
repairs of major building element components is expected over the next 10 years. Large capital
expenditures will be required for: an overhaul of the HVAC systems; major structural repairs; and, within
5-10 years, a replacement of the entire main roof.

November 2018 Page 50 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

1.1 ICE PLANT (NOT-IN-SCOPE)

Assessment of the Ice plant was not within the scope of this review. At the time WSP was retained to
carry out this Building Condition Assessment, the Facility Manager had planned to contract a refrigeration
contractor to carry out an assessment of the Ice plant – but turnover of that position has compromised
that plan. It is of critical importance to have a qualified firm conduct a detailed inspection of the Ice plant
including an assessment of the embedded piping below the ice surface to help determine the remaining
useful life of the rink, as well as an assessment of Ammonia safety provisions including alarming, room
exhaust, combustibles, and room construction.

November 2018 Page 51 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

1.2 NEXT STEPS AND COMMENTARY

0. WSP is not necessarily recommending the full program of capital improvements listed in
this report (Section 3, Section 4, and reflected in the summary table in 5.2). The Town /
Facility Management must consider both the condition of the ice plant as well as the rest of
the building systems (among other financial, environmental and political factors) in making
decisions about appropriate capital improvements to the facility.
A cost/benefit analysis is required to determine if the capital expenditures outlined in this
BCA are warranted as opposed to decommissioning, or complete rebuild and/or
consolidation of facilities.

1. Complete the upgrades necessary to resolve the critical deficiencies highlighted in sub-
section 5.1.

2. Retain a qualified firm(s) to conduct a detailed assessment of the ice plant including an
inspection of the embedded piping below the ice surface and Ammonia safety provisions.
Risk factors include whether it is steel piping vs. plastic.

3. Determine the remaining useful life (RUL) of the ice rink based on the RUL of the rink
concrete slab or the RUL of the embedded refrigerant piping, whichever is less. The RUL
of the rink slab is estimated to be >10 years, but a program of annual or bi-annual
inspections should be used to refine this estimate going forward. The RUL of the refrigerant
piping is yet to be determined.

4. Implement annual inspections of the main roof to keep track of condition.

November 2018 Page 52 of 52

Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

APPENDIX

A
Designated and Hazardous Substance Survey

September 2018
TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH

DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY
KEADY COMMUNITY CENTRE - 116931 GREY
ROAD 3, TARA, ONTARIO

SEPTEMBER 25, 2018

DESIGNATED
SUBSTANCES AND
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
SURVEY
KEADY COMMUNITY CENTRE -
116931 GREY ROAD 3, TARA,
ONTARIO
TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH

VERSION 1

PROJECT NO.: 181-11748-00

DATE: SEPTEMBER 2018

WSP

WSP.COM
wsp.com

September 25, 2018

TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH
Civic #316837 Highway 6, RR#1 Chatsworth ON
N0H 1G0

Attention: Mr. Jamie Morgan, Operations Manager

Dear Sir:
Subject: Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey, Keady Community Centre -
116931 Grey Road 3, Tara, Ontario
WSP Canada Inc. (WSP) was retained by Township of Chatsworth to carry out a Designated
Substances & Hazardous Materials Survey (DSS) of Keady Community Centre located at 116931
Grey Road 3 in Tara, Ontario.
The purpose of this survey is to determine the presence/absence of Designated Substances
within the centre, and to provide information to contractors at the time of tender to ensure
complete and correct removal or handling of materials prior to the scheduled renovation of the
structure.
The following report discusses the methodologies and findings of this survey.
We trust that the attached report is satisfactory for your purposes at this time. Please contact
the undersigned should you have any questions or concerns.

Yours sincerely,

Erin Kennealy, CIH

Manager, Hazardous Materials

EK/PB

WSP ref.: 181-11748-00

QUALITY MANAGEMENT

ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3

Remarks DSS Report

Date 09/25/2018

Prepared by Patricia Baptiste

Signature

Reviewed by Erin Kennealy

Signature

Authorised by

Signature

Project number 181-11748-00

Report number 01

File reference DSS Report – Keady

Community Centre,
Tara, Ontario
SIGNATURES

PREPARED BY

Patricia Baptiste, Hons. B.A.

Environmental Technician, Hazardous Materials

REVIEWED BY

Erin Kennealy, CIH

Manager, Hazardous Materials

This report was prepared by WSP Canada Inc for the account of TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH, in accordance with the
professional services agreement. The disclosure of any information contained in this report is the sole responsibility of the
intended recipient. The material in it reflects TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH best judgement in light of the information
available to it at the time of preparation. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions
to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH accepts no responsibility
for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. This
limitations statement is considered part of this report.
The original of the technology-based document sent herewith has been authenticated and will be retained by WSP for a
minimum of ten years. Since the file transmitted is now out of WSP’s control and its integrity can no longer be ensured, no
guarantee may be given with regards to any modifications made to this document.

DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY WSP

Project No. 181-11748-00 September 2018
TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH Page iii
PRODUCTION TEAM
CLIENT

Operations Manager Jamie Morgan

WSP

Manager Erin Kennealy

Project Manager Danielle Vella

Environmental Technician Patricia Baptiste

DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY WSP

Project No. 181-11748-00 September 2018
TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH Page v
 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
WSP Canada Inc. (WSP) was retained by TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH to carry out a Designated Substances &
Hazardous Materials Survey (DSS) of Keady Community Centre located at 116931 Grey Road 3 in Tara, Ontario.
The subject site is located approximately fifty (50) metres east of the main intersection of Grey Road 3 and
County Road 3 in Tara, Ontario. The site consists of a two-storey building with a sloped metal roof and a
corrugated metal and brick façade. The building’s main use is community’s banquet center and hockey arena.
The purpose of this survey is to determine the presence/absence of Designated Substances within the centre,
and to provide information to contractors at the time of tender to ensure complete and correct removal or
handling of materials prior to the scheduled renovation of the structure.
A summary of the results of WSP’s site inspection and bulk sampling is presented below:
Table 1 – Designated Substances & Hazardous Materials Survey Findings at 116931 Grey Road 3 in Tara,
Ontario

MATERIAL SURVEY FINDINGS

Asbestos Based on the laboratory results, one (1) of the eighteen (18) homogeneous building
material samples collected and analyzed are considered to be asbestos-containing
(defined as material that contains 0.5% or more asbestos by dry weight). The following
asbestos-containing materials are present within the building:
Non-Friable
— Sink backing (Gold) observed in the server on the underside of the sinks
— 3.0% Chrysotile; Sample Number AS10
Notes:
— Asbestos-containing materials may be present in inaccessible areas throughout the building
(i.e. wall/ceiling cavities, roof, electrical/mechanical equipment, etc.)

Lead Based on the laboratory results, four (4) of the ten (10) paint samples collected and
analyzed have detectable concentrations of lead. The following materials are considered
lead-containing:
— Light brown paint observed on doors and door frames throughout the building;
— Black paint observed on door frames throughout the building;
— Dark green paint observed on the door in the garage/Storage area; and
— Light green paint observed on Corrugated metal walls throughout the garage/storage area.
Lead is also expected to be present in the following building components:
— painted surfaces visually similar to the above noted lead-containing paints;
— in lead acid batteries in emergency lighting throughout the surveyed area;
— as a component in ceramic building products such as tiles and bricks;
— as a component of the solder on sweated joints between copper pipe and fittings;
— as a component of the solder on wire connections of electric components;
— as a component of solder used to seal the bell fitting of cast iron rain water leader pipes; and
— as a malleable metal sheeting/flashing around roof edges, vent stacks, HVAC fixtures, etc.

DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY WSP

Project No. 181-11748-00 September 2018
TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH Page vi
 MATERIAL SURVEY FINDINGS

Mercury Although no samples were analyzed for mercury, it is presumed to be present as a gas in
fluorescent and CFL light tubes, as well as in liquid form in thermostat switches observed
throughout the surveyed area.

Building materials and components known to contain silica such as glass, concrete,
Silica
masonry, stone and mortar etc., were observed throughout the surveyed area.
Individual fluorescent light ballasts were not inspected for the presence of PCBs as they
PCBs
were operational at the time of the site visit and therefore inaccessible to the surveyor.
Fluorescent light ballasts may contain PCBs. Transformers potentially containing PCBs
were observed in the proposed work areas.

Radioactive
Smoke detectors were observed within the surveyed areas at the time of the assessment.
Materials

Beverage coolers and air conditioning/HVAC units were observed within the work areas,
Ozone Depleting
however the labels were inaccessible at the time of the site investigation. As such, these
Substances
units may contain ODSs and should be inspected for the presence/ absence at the time of
(ODS)
disposal.
Water-damaged and mould-affected building materials were observed on ceiling tiles
Mould
within the front entrance area and the ground floor storage/electrical room.
A radioactive gas naturally emitted from the earth through the breakdown of uranium in
Radon
soil. It enters buildings by seeping in through cracks, pipes, windows and the foundation
etc.
Ammonia was observed to be present during our site investigation. Ammonia is a common
Ammonia
refrigerant used in ice arena. It is recommended that the ammonia be stored, maintained and
handled in accordance with the Boiler and Pressure Vessels Regulation, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 59 as well
as the CSA B-52 Mechanical Refrigeration Code (MRC).

RECOMMENDATIONS
Removal of all asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) (non-friable) must be conducted before any work that may
damage these materials. Removal must be conducted in accordance with the Occupational Health and Safety
Act (OSHA) regarding worker protection, to avoid the inhalation or ingestion of asbestos fibres. Non-friable
ACM identified can be removed using Type 1, Type 2 or Type 3 removal procedures, depending on removal
procedures used by the contractor as specified in Ontario Regulation 278/05. Confirmation that the asbestos
removal has been conducted in accordance with the OHSA is recommended prior to any contract work in areas
proposed for demolition.
All designated substances must be handled in accordance with the appropriate guidelines and regulations.
Designated Substance and Hazardous Material information will require updating if corrective measures have
been instituted and materials have been removed from the building.
Special precautions should be taken when disturbing any concrete or painted surfaces given the presence of
silica, lead and potentially arsenic. All designated substances must be handled in accordance with the
appropriate guidelines and regulations. The Ministry of Labour (MOL) has published guidelines for handling
and controlling lead and silica in construction and it is recommended that these guidelines be followed when

DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY WSP

Project No. 181-11748-00 September 2018
TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH Page vii
 removing and cutting into the concrete. Coring, sawing or breaking up the materials containing silica, lead and
potentially arsenic should be completed only with appropriate dust suppression methods, proper respiratory
protection and general worker safety precautions as outlined in the MOL Guidance documents and in the
Occupational Health and Safety Act.
The presence of mercury within assembled units (e.g. fluorescent light bulbs and thermostat switches) should
not be considered a hazard provided that the assembled units remain sealed and intact. Avoid direct skin
contact with mercury and avoid inhalation of mercury vapour. Dispose of mercury following applicable
legislative requirements.
It is the intention of the federal government to phase out the use of ODSs by the year 2030 in order to protect
the upper atmosphere. The MOE has issued Regulation 356 regarding the use, disposal and recycling of ODS’s.
Recapturing of ODS’s during servicing must be done by licensed personnel.
Beverage coolers and HVAC/ air conditioning units were observed during the time of the site investigation,
which are suspected to contain ODSs. If other equipment is discovered and observed to contain ODSs (i.e. R-22 or
R-12), in the event of removal, the units should be recycled following Ontario Regulation 189/94, Refrigerants
(O. Reg. 189/94), as amended. All equipment containing ODSs must be serviced by an individual holding a valid
Ozone Depletion Prevention (ODP) Card, issued by the MOE and the refrigerant drained from the unit and
collected for recycling or disposal in accordance with all applicable legislation.
Mould-affected materials identified during survey should be removed/handled in accordance with the Canadian
Construction Association document CCA 82/2004. Contractors should be warned of the potential presence of
mould and every precaution should be taken to prevent airborne exposure to workers where mould is present
and where workers are likely to inhale or ingest mould.
Radon is a radioactive gas naturally emitted from the earth through the breakdown of uranium in soil. It enters
buildings by seeping in through cracks, pipes, windows and the foundation etc. As such, it is recommended that
radon-resistant design features be considered for future buildings constructed on the site. It is also,
recommended that the building be tested for elevated radon levels.
If during renovation or demolition, additional materials suspected of containing asbestos are encountered, they
must be handled in accordance with the appropriate guidelines and regulations. It should be noted that
asbestos may be present in the enclosed spaces not accessible at the time of the site visit.
Complete commentary on each of the designated substances in the project area will be discussed in the report to
follow. This executive summary is not intended to substitute for the complete report, nor does it discuss certain
specific issues documented within the report.

DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY WSP

Project No. 181-11748-00 September 2018
TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH Page viii
TABLE OF EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................. VI

CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1

1.1 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................... 1

1.2 SURVEY OBJECTIVES ........................................................................ 1

1.3 SCOPE OF WORK.................................................................................2

2 METHODOLOGY ................................................................. 3
2.1 GENERAL SURVEY METHODOLOGY ...........................................3

2.2 ASBESTOS SURVEY METHODOLOGY.........................................3

2.3 LEAD SURVEY METHODOLOGY ................................................... 4

2.4 SILICA ...................................................................................................... 5

2.5 MERCURY .............................................................................................. 5

2.6 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCB) .................................... 5

2.7 MOULD .................................................................................................... 5

3 SITE OVERVIEW.................................................................. 6
3.1 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................ 6

3.2 RECORDS REVIEW ............................................................................ 6

3.3 HEATING/MECHANICAL SYSTEM ............................................... 6

3.4 SITE INSPECTION ............................................................................... 6

4 REGULATORY CONTEXT ................................................ 7

4.1 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES ...........................................................7

4.2 ADDITIONAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR

ASBESTOS ..............................................................................................7

4.3 ADDITIONAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR LEAD ..7

4.4 ADDITIONAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE

MANAGEMENT .................................................................................... 8

DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY WSP

Project No. 181-11748-00 September 2018
TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH Page ix
 4.5 OTHER APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES .... 8

5 OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS.................................. 9

5.1 ASBESTOS ............................................................................................. 9
5.1.1 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS ................................................................................9
5.1.2 SUSPECTED ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS ............................................... 10
5.1.3 SUMMARY OF BULK SAMPLES IDENTIFIED AS “NON-ASBESTOS” ............... 11

5.2 LEAD ....................................................................................................... 12

5.3 OTHER DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND HAZARDOUS

MATERIALS .......................................................................................... 15

6 LIMITATIONS ...................................................................... 21

TABLES
TABLE 1 – DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES & HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS SURVEY FINDINGS AT 116931
GREY ROAD 3 IN TARA, ONTARIO................................... VI
TABLE 2 - MINIMUM NUMBER OF BULK SAMPLES TO BE
COLLECTED UNDER O. REG. 278/05
ACCORDING TO MATERIAL AREA,
APPLICATION AND FRIABILITY ............................................ 4
TABLE 3 - ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS ......................................... 9
TABLE 4 - SUMMARY OF BULK SAMPLES IDENTIFIED AS
"NON-ASBESTOS" ......................................................................... 11
TABLE 5 - SUMMARY OF LEAD CONCENTRATIONS IN
BULK PAINT SAMPLES ............................................................. 12

APPENDICES
A ANALYTICAL RESULTS – ASBESTOS & LEAD
B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
C EVALUATION CRITERIA
D GLOSSARY OF TERMS
E DRAWINGS

DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY WSP

Project No. 181-11748-00 September 2018
TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH Page x
 DRAWINGS
DRAWING 1 GROUND FLOOR – SAMPLING LOCATIONS
DRAWING 2 SECOND FLOOR – SAMPLING LOCATIONS

DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY WSP

Project No. 181-11748-00 September 2018
TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH Page xi
 1

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
WSP Canada Inc. (WSP) was retained by TOWNSHIP OF CHATSWORTH to carry out a Designated Substances &
Hazardous Materials Survey (DSS) of Keady Community Centre located at 116931 Grey Road 3 in Tara,
Ontario.
The subject site is located approximately fifty (50) metres east of the main intersection of Grey Road 3 and
County Road 3 in Tara, Ontario. The site consists of a two-storey building with a sloped metal roof and a
corrugated metal and brick façade. The building’s main use is community’s banquet center and hockey arena.
The purpose of this survey is to determine the presence/absence of Designated Substances within the centre,
and to provide information to contractors at the time of tender to ensure complete and correct removal or
handling of materials prior to the scheduled renovation of the structure.

1.2 SURVEY OBJECTIVES

This survey is required to satisfy a building owner’s requirements under Section 30 of the Ontario Occupational
Health & Safety Act (OHSA) which requires building owners to determine if there are any Designated
Substances present, prior to commencement of a project, which may involve construction, renovation or
demolition related activities. This information allows workers to take appropriate steps to prevent accidental
exposure to these harmful substances. This report should be provided to all maintenance workers, prospective
contractors (and in turn to their sub-trades) who are likely to handle, come into contact with, or disturb
building materials. Contractors who may work in close proximity to the identified materials and who may also
disturb the materials should also be notified.
The primary objectives of the survey were to:
— Develop an up-to-date inventory, and gain a better understanding of the Designated Substances and/or
hazardous materials that are present in the centre;
— Document their locations, applications, concentrations, quantities, and conditions in the surveyed areas
in order to provide workers, and prospective contractors, with adequate information to prevent
accidental exposures; and
— Provide recommendations for the safe removal, handling and disposal of the identified Designated
Substances and hazardous materials as necessary.
The asbestos information in this survey report complies with the requirements of the Occupational Health &
Safety Act, Ontario Regulation 278/05: Designated Substance - Asbestos on Construction Projects and in
Building and Repair Operations with respect to asbestos-containing materials for the structures.
Regulation 490/09 states that all necessary measures and procedures are to be taken to ensure the time-
weighted average exposure of a worker to any form of airborne asbestos does not exceed 0.1 fibres per cubic
centimeter of air, averaged over an 8-hour work period. In order to abide by this regulation, contractors
specializing in asbestos removal are required to remove all asbestos-containing building materials from the
buildings prior to any renovation or demolition that will disturb these materials.

WSP
No 1
 2

1.3 SCOPE OF WORK

The scope of this work program was to sample and analyze materials considered to be suspect or possible
designated substances or asbestos-containing materials. This Designated Substances and Hazardous
Materials Survey entailed:
— A room by room visual inspection of the accessible areas of the structures for Designated Substances and
hazardous materials;
— Collection of bulk samples of materials suspected to contain asbestos according to the requirements
stipulated in O. Reg. 278/05 (see Table 2);
— Assessment of the condition of the asbestos-containing materials;
— Collection of a representative number of bulk paint samples;
— Inventory of (visibly) evident sources of mercury (e.g. light tubes and thermostats);
— Assessment of the likelihood of exposure to designated substances with recommendations for
appropriate corrective action where required;
— Visual identification of suspected and/or obvious signs of mould; and
— Visual identification of other Designated Substances and hazardous materials including equipment
containing ODS, fuel, oil and/or waste oil storage, chemical storage, and/or radioactive materials. Where
possible name plate/label information and quantities were recorded.
The survey did not involve destructive sampling (i.e. inspection within drywall (false) walls or ceilings,
mechanical equipment such as boilers, furnaces, HVAC systems, or within electrical equipment). These areas
are considered not accessible to the surveyor and as such materials suspected to contain asbestos and other
Designated Substances and hazardous materials may be present within these inaccessible areas.
The survey included the identification of potential friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials
within the centre. Asbestos means any of the following fibrous silicates: actinolite, amosite, anthophyllite,
chrysotile, crocidolite or tremolite. According to the above-mentioned Ontario Regulation 278/05, the term
‘friable material’ is applied to a material that when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized or powdered with
moderate hand pressure. Asbestos materials that are friable have a greater potential to release airborne
asbestos fibres when disturbed. Common friable asbestos-containing buildings materials used in the past
include sprayed fireproofing, stucco texture coat, and thermal pipe and jacket insulation.
Common non-friable asbestos containing materials include vinyl floor tiles, gasket materials, asbestos cement
(Transite™) pipe, Transite™ board and asbestos textiles. If these materials do however release fine dust due to
deterioration or during removal, the free dust is considered friable.

WSP
No 1
 3

2 METHODOLOGY
2.1 GENERAL SURVEY METHODOLOGY
WSP’s survey sought to identify those substances defined as Designated Substances under the Ontario
Occupational Health and Safety Act including: asbestos (friable and non-friable), lead, mercury, silica, benzene,
acrylonitrile, arsenic, coke oven emissions, ethylene oxide, isocyanates, and vinyl chloride. In addition, other
hazardous materials, such as PCBs, ozone-depleting substances (ODS), Radioactive Materials and other stored
chemicals and wastes were included in the survey scope.
WSP’s surveyors performed a systematic survey of the industrial building for the purposes of identifying
Designated Substances and hazardous materials and documenting observations made about their locations,
estimated quantities and respective conditions. These observations form the basis for developing the
recommendations provided within this report.
The survey of the structures for designated substances consisted of a walk through and physical examination
of suspected materials in accessible areas of the building. A physical examination was completed to assess the
condition of materials and to examine for underlying layers. In situations where asbestos-containing materials
or other Designated Substances extended into a non-accessible area, such as asbestos cement parging on
mechanical pipes, it would be assumed that the asbestos-containing materials were also present in these areas
and were reported as such.

2.2 ASBESTOS SURVEY METHODOLOGY

The surveyors inspected the industrial building for the presence of friable and non-friable asbestos-containing
materials (ACM). Examples of ACM commonly found in buildings may include:
— Sprayed insulation
— Acoustic/texture plaster
— Drywall joint compound
— Mechanical insulation
— Asbestos cement
— Pipe Insulation
— Acoustic ceiling tiles
— Vinyl floor tiles and vinyl sheet flooring
— Plaster
Bulk samples were collected from suspect materials (i.e. materials known as having the potential to be
asbestos-containing) and analyzed to identify or confirm the presence/absence of asbestos. Asbestos samples
are collected by taking a small volume of material (approximately two square centimeters in size) from either
intact material or preferably from a damaged section. The collected samples were placed in zipper storage
plastic bags, sealed and forwarded to an analytical laboratory.
The bulk samples collected were then submitted to an accredited, independent laboratory for analysis
(accompanied by a chain of custody form) of asbestos content via US EPA Method EPA/600/R-93/116: Method
for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials in accordance with the requirements of O. Reg.

WSP
No 1
 4

278/05. The laboratory was instructed to use “stop-positive” analysis when asbestos is identified via Polarized
Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis.
The number of bulk samples required, in order to establish whether a material is asbestos-containing
according O. Reg. 278/05, is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2 - Minimum Number of Bulk Samples to be collected under O. Reg. 278/05 According to
Material Area, Application and Friability

SIZE OF
MINIMUM NUMBER OF BULK
TYPE OF MATERIAL HOMOGENEOUS
SAMPLES
MATERIAL

Less than 90 m2 3
Surfacing material, including
2
without limitation material 90 m or more, but less than
5
450 m2
that is applied to surfaces by
spraying, by troweling or
otherwise, such as acoustical
plaster on ceilings,
450 m2 or more 7
fireproofing materials on
structural members and
plaster

Thermal insulation, except as

Any size 3
described below
Thermal insulation patch Less than 2m or 0.5 m2 1
Other material Any size 3

As per the requirements set out in Table 1 of O. Reg. 278/05, a total of fifty-six (56) samples were collected
and submitted for asbestos analysis as part of this survey. Fibreglass insulation was not submitted for
analysis as it can be identified visually and was never manufactured with asbestos.
In accordance with the analysis techniques required by O. Reg. 278/05:
— for layered materials, subsamples are taken from each individual or discrete layer and each subsample is
then treated as a discrete sample; and

— if a material is found to contain greater than 0.5% asbestos, additional bulk material samples taken from
the same homogeneous material are not required to be analyzed.
As per these requirements, a total of seventy-one (71) samples were analyzed by the laboratory for this
assessment.

2.3 LEAD SURVEY METHODOLOGY

Bulk paint samples (paint chips) were collected from each distinct colour of paint observed within the
surveyed area. Samples were collected with the aid of a thin-bladed knife, which was cleaned prior to each
sampling event. WSP’s surveyor selected sample locations where it appeared that the paint application was
most representative of all areas on which it was applied. Each paint chip sample was placed in a clear bag
with a tight closure, uniquely labelled and then placed in a second, similar bag. A chain of custody form was
completed and accompanied the bulk samples to an accredited, independent laboratory for analysis of lead

WSP
No 1
 5

content. Lead analysis was performed following ASTM Method, ASTM D3335-85A “Standard Method to Test for
Low Concentrations of Lead in Paint by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry”.

2.4 SILICA
The surveyor inspected the structure for the presence of materials known to contain silica. Silica is present
in materials such as such as glass, concrete, masonry, stone and mortar which are prevalent materials in
building construction. No samples were collected or analyzed.

2.5 MERCURY
The surveyor inspected the structure for equipment which is likely to contain mercury. Pertinent
information of the suspected equipment including: manufacturer, dates, model and serial numbers, and
quantities were recorded when available. No samples were collected or analyzed.

2.6 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCB)

The surveyor inspected the structure for equipment which may contain PCBs. Equipment that is generally
suspected of containing PCBs includes lamp ballasts, transformers, hydraulic fluid, compressors, switchgears,
capacitors and other electric equipment. Pertinent information of the suspected equipment including:
manufacturer, dates, model and serial numbers, and quantities were recorded when available. No samples
were collected or analyzed.

2.7 MOULD
The surveyor inspected the structure for the presence of mould. This included a non-intrusive visual
assessment of exterior and interior building material surfaces and components for evidence of obvious visible
mould, and/or areas conducive to mould growth (i.e. demonstrating significant moisture saturation and
water damage). No samples were collected or analyzed.

2.8 RADON
Radon is a radioactive gas naturally emitted from the earth through the breakdown of uranium in soil. It
enters buildings by seeping in through cracks, pipes, windows and the foundation etc. As such, it is
recommended that radon-resistant design features be considered for future buildings constructed on the site.
It is also, recommended that the building be tested for elevated radon levels.

WSP
No 1
 6

3 SITE OVERVIEW
3.1 SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject site is located approximately fifty (50) metres east of the main intersection of Grey Road 3 and
County Road 3 in Tara, Ontario. The site consists of a two-storey building with a sloped metal roof and a
corrugated metal and brick façade. The building’s main use is community’s banquet center and hockey arena.

The floors within the building were generally concrete finished with carpet, vinyl sheet flooring, ceramic tile
and vinyl floor tiles. Walls were generally constructed of concrete block and drywall. Ceilings were either
open to the steel structure or finished with drywall and suspended ceiling tiles. The exterior of the building
was finished with brick and corrugated metal sheets.

3.2 RECORDS REVIEW

No previous asbestos related or designated substance reports were provided for review during this study.

3.3 HEATING/MECHANICAL SYSTEM

The structure was heated via furnace units with associated ductwork.
Mechanical pipe straights observed during the site reconnaissance were either not insulated or insulated
with non-asbestos pipe insulation.

3.4 SITE INSPECTION

The building was inspected by WSP representative Ms. Danielle Vella and Mrs. Patricia Baptiste on August
22nd, 2018.
There was no access to the roof the building at the time of the investigation. If materials suspected to be
asbestos-containing are observed on the roof, testing and analysis should be conducted prior to disturbance.

WSP
No 1
 7

4 REGULATORY CONTEXT
4.1 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES
Section 30 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act (the Act) stipulates that prior to the commencement of a
project a list shall be prepared of all Designated Substances that are present at the project site (i.e. a Designated
Substances survey). In accordance with the Act, the locations of Designated Substances must be identified in
writing to all prospective constructors, contractors and sub-contractors who may work, disturb or come into
contact with this type of material, at the same time as, or prior to, project tendering.
The term “Designated Substance” refers to the eleven chemical or physical agents specifically identified within
the Act. Each of these substances is governed by a consolidated regulation, Designated Substances - Ontario
Regulation 490/09 (O. Reg. 490/09) that defines the minimum health and safety requirements for assuring safe
worker-substance interaction as well as the obligations of employers and workers in workplaces containing
these substances. O. Reg. 490/09 further stipulates the maximum concentrations of each of the respective
substance to which a worker may be exposed, according to short-term exposure values and time-weighted
average exposure values.

4.2 ADDITIONAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR

ASBESTOS
Among the Designated Substances, asbestos is unique in that it is governed by two regulations under the Act -
one for the general mining and processing operations of asbestos and one for asbestos on construction projects
and in buildings and repair operations.
Ontario Regulation 278/05 (O. Reg. 278/05), made under the Act, entitled “Designated Substance – Asbestos on
Construction Projects and in Buildings and Repair Operations” came into effect on November 1, 2005, with
some sections contained therein becoming effective on November 1, 2007. This regulation revoked and
replaced the previous asbestos regulation, O. Reg. 838/90.

4.3 ADDITIONAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR

LEAD
The Ontario Ministry of Labour (MOL) has not prescribed specific criteria for classification of lead-containing
paints or other surface coatings and construction materials. The Surface Coating Materials Regulation
(SOR/2005-109) made under the federal Hazardous Products Act (HPA) prescribes an acceptable level of 0.009%
(90 ppm) lead by dry weight or less, as determined by bulk chemical analysis in accordance with good
laboratory practises. Under the Surface Coating Materials Regulation (SOR/2005-109) Section 4.2, the following
paints and surface coatings are excluded from the above noted acceptable lead level:
1 as an anti-corrosive or an anti-weathering coating applied on the interior or exterior surface of any
building or equipment that is used for an agricultural or industrial purpose;
2 as an anti-corrosive or an anti-weathering coating applied on any structure other than a building, that is
used for an agricultural, industrial or public purpose;
3 as a touch-up coating for metal surfaces;
4 on traffic signs;
5 for graphic art on billboards or similar displays;

WSP
No 1
 8

6 for identification marks in industrial buildings; or

7 as materials for the purposes of arts, crafts or hobbies, other than material for use by children.
However, based on a recent publication (EACO Lead Guideline For Construction, Renovation, Maintenance or
Repair dated October 2014) from the Environmental Abatement Council of Ontario (EACO), an industry group
representing consultants and contractors in the Ontario abatement industry, various occupational and
workplace safety authorities and agencies consider that any detectable amount of lead in paint and similar
materials has the potential to produce an airborne hazard to workers and building occupants when these
materials are disturbed.
As such, for the purpose of this survey, WSP has classified any material containing detectable/measurable
amounts of lead as “lead-containing” materials and recommends that all disturbances to these materials be
conducted in accordance with the EACO or MOL document Guidelines, Lead on Construction Projects.

4.4 ADDITIONAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR

WASTE MANAGEMENT
The disposal of Designated Substances is regulated under the Ontario Environmental Protection Act, specifically
R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 347, General – Waste Management (most recently amended by O. Reg. 334/13). The regulation
details the minimum requirements for the appropriate transport and disposal of wastes.

4.5 OTHER APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND

GUIDELINES
The following regulations and guidance documents may also apply to this survey:
— Guideline for Lead on Construction Projects (MOL, September 2004, as amended)
— Guideline for Silica on Construction Projects (MOL, September 2004, as amended)
— The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for the Evaluation
and Control of Lead-Based Paint in Housing
— Canadian PCB Regulations (SOR/2008-273)
— O. Reg. 362 Waste Management – PCBs
— Mercury-Containing Products Pollution Prevention Fact Sheet #21 (Ministry of Environment (MOE),
September 2001, as amended)
— O. Reg. 347/90 General Waste Management
— Canadian Construction Association document CCA 82/2004
— Canadian Chlorofluorocarbon Regulations (SOR/90-127), Ozone-depleting, Substances Regulation
(SOR/94-408) and Ozone Depleting Substances Products Regulations (SOR/90-584)
— O. Reg. 463/10 ODS and Other Halocarbons
— Lead Guideline For Construction, Renovation, Maintenance or Repair (Environmental Abatement Council
of Ontario – October 2014)
— EACO Lead Guideline for Construction, Renovation, Maintenance and Repair, October 2014.
— EACO Mould Abatement Guidelines, 2010

WSP
No 1
 9

5 OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS

Information in this section of the report should be provided to all prospective contractors, tenants, and/or
workers who are likely to handle, come into contact with, or disturb asbestos or other designated substances.
Detailed specifications that outline specific abatement procedures are recommended when tendering the
renovation/demolition work.
This information may require updating upon the removal of Designated Substances upon completion of the
renovations or demolition. A close out report stating that the materials are no longer present is also required
once the materials are removed. If ACM is to remain in place, O. Reg. 278/05 requires the preparation and
establishment of an Asbestos Management Plan for the building.
Contractors and maintenance personnel should be warned of the possibility of undisclosed materials when
breaking into enclosed areas. Friable and Non-Friable building materials discovered in enclosed areas should
be treated as asbestos until proven otherwise and other substances, self-evident as designated substances,
should be handled in a likewise fashion.

5.1 ASBESTOS

5.1.1 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

In accordance with the requirements of O. Reg. 278/05, homogenous materials (i.e. materials uniform in color
and texture) must be considered to be asbestos-containing, if any sample which is collected from that
homogeneous material, is identified to have an asbestos concentration of 0.5% or greater.
A total of fifty-six (56) building material samples were collected from eighteen (18) homogeneous building
materials and submitted for laboratory analysis of asbestos content. The table below summarizes only those
materials which were identified or presumed to be asbestos-containing materials and are presented along
with recommended remedial actions for each respective material.
Recommended actions for management, repair or removal of these materials, are based on the requirements
and procedures specified by O. Reg. 278/05 and have been suggested based on the type of disturbance which
is anticipated or likely. Alternate handling, repair and removal procedures must comply with the
requirements of O. Reg. 278/05 (as amended). Refer to Appendix C for condition, accessibility and action
definitions.
Table 3 - Asbestos-Containing Materials

MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION & ASSESSMENT ACTION1 PHOTO2
LOCATION

Action 7 – Routine surveillance of

Sink backing (Gold)
ACM in good condition.
observed in the servery Sample ID: AS10
cabinetry on the Ground Concentration: 3.0% Chrysotile
Prior to renovation/demolition
Floor. Material: Non-Friable 4
activities which may disturb this
Accessibility: A material, remove the material
Condition: Good following Type 1 asbestos abatement
procedures.

WSP
No 1
 10

MATERIAL
DESCRIPTION & ASSESSMENT ACTION1 PHOTO2
LOCATION

Action 7 – Routine surveillance of

Sample ID: N/A ACM in good condition.
Concentration: Presumed to be ACM
Roofing material This material requires additional
Material: Friable/Non-Friable
observed on the roof of testing. If this material is identified as N/A
Accessibility: C (Areas of the building asbestos-containing then it must be
the building.
where use of a ladder is required). removed following Type 1/2 asbestos
Condition: Good abatement procedures prior to
renovation/demolition.

1 For sample ID and concentration levels refer to Appendix A: Analytical Results – Asbestos & Lead. Refer to
Appendix B for ACM Evaluation Criteria.
2 Actions and procedures recommended are based on the requirements of O. Reg. 278/05, refer to this regulation for
details.
3 For relevant photographs taken during the survey refer to Appendix C: Site Photographs.
4 For sample locations refer to Appendix E: Drawings.

5.1.2 SUSPECTED ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

Certain building materials which have historically contained asbestos were not included in the survey since
they were inaccessible, are used in a random fashion, or have a low risk of asbestos fibre release.
These materials include:
— Buried services such as underground piping; these pipes were commonly manufactured from a non-
friable form of asbestos cement but are inaccessible for sampling without excavation work. Site
drawings should be consulted and reviewed to ascertain the presence or absence of such structures.
— Floor levelling compounds; these materials were used in a random fashion, may or may not contain
asbestos, and require demolition of floor finishes to access for sample collection. Floor levelling
compounds were not observed but may be present.
— Fire rated doors with asbestos-containing insulation within may be present but are inaccessible without
damaging the integrity of the door. The interior of these door should be inspected prior to disposal
and/or significant disturbance (i.e. cutting or breaking).
— Vermiculite insulation within wall cavities may be present but inaccessible without demolition.
— Packing materials in valves, fittings, etc., may be present but are inaccessible without demolition
activities (e.g. within concealed areas behind bulkheads).
In addition, inspection of mechanical equipment such as furnaces, HVAC systems, chimneys or within
electrical equipment was not conducted due to safety limitations. These areas are considered not accessible
to the surveyor and as such materials suspected to contain asbestos may be present within these inaccessible
areas, including:
— electrical wiring insulation,
— electrical conductors,
— high temperature gaskets,
— incandescent light fixture backing,
— ductwork connections,

WSP
No 1
 11

— thermal insulator around electrical elements around baseboard heaters,

— interior of boilers.
Once services are decommissioned, these areas should be inspected and/or sampled for presence or absence
of asbestos.
If renovation or demolition activities are likely to disturb the materials, it is required that all identified
asbestos-containing materials be removed in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05. If any potential asbestos-
containing materials are encountered unexpectedly, WSP should be contacted to sample, monitor and/or
document the removal of asbestos-containing materials, and to ensure that appropriate procedures are being
followed.

5.1.3 SUMMARY OF BULK SAMPLES IDENTIFIED AS “NON-ASBESTOS”

The table below summarizes the results of bulk material samples collected from suspect materials during this
survey, which had either no detectable concentrations of asbestos, or had asbestos concentrations less than
the regulated threshold limit of 0.5% (by weight), and therefore can be considered as “non-asbestos” in
accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.
Table 4 - Summary of Bulk Samples Identified as "Non-Asbestos"

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION / LOCATION SAMPLE ID1

Ceiling tiles (2’ x 4’ Fissures with Sparse Pindots - White) observed in select areas
AS 1-1 to AS 1-3
within the building.
Ceiling tiles (2’ x 4’ Fissures with Many Pindots – White) observed in select areas
AS 2-1 to AS 2-3
within the building.
Ceiling tiles (2’ x 4’ Fissures with Few Pindots – White) observed in select areas
AS 3-1 to AS 3-3
within the building.
Ceiling tiles (2’ x 4’ Small Fissures with Pindots – White) observed in select areas
AS 4-1 to AS 4-3
within the building.
Drywall joint compound observed throughout the building. AS 5-1 to AS 5-5
Vinyl floor tiles (12” x 12” Off-White with Black Streaks) and associated mastic
AS 6-1 to AS 6-3
(Black) observed in select areas within the hall.
Vinyl floor tiles (12” x 12” Tan with Beige/Brown Blots) and associated mastic
AS 7-1 to AS 7-3
(Black) observed in select areas within the hall.
Mastic (Yellow) observed in storage room #2 within the hall. AS 8-1 to AS 8-3
Flooring coating (Green) observed in storage room #2 within the hall. AS 9-1 to AS 9-3
Vinyl sheet flooring (Grey with Light Grey Streaks) observed throughout
AS 11-1 to AS 11-3
changerooms within the building.
Vinyl floor tiles (12” x 12” Off-White with Black/Brown Streaks); associated
mastic (Black) and leveling compound observed in storage room #3 within the AS 12-1 to AS 12-3
hall.
Coating on board (White) observed in arena within the building. AS 13-1 to AS 13-3
Vinyl floor tiles (12” x 12” Tan with White & Grey Specks) and associated mastic
AS 14-1 to AS 14-3
(Grey) observed in mezzanine area within the building.

WSP
No 1
 12

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION / LOCATION SAMPLE ID1

Vinyl sheet flooring (White Square Pattern with paper backing) observed on the
AS 15-1 to AS 15-3
2nd floor in room #2 within the building.
Vinyl floor tiles (12” x 12”) and associated mastic (Yellow) observed underneath
AS 16-1 to AS 16-3
the vinyl sheet flooring on the 2nd floor in room #2 within the building.
Mortar (Grey) observed on the exterior wall of the building. AS 17-1 to AS 17-3
Firestop around conduit (White) observed on the exterior wall of the building. AS 18-1 to AS 18-3
1 – Laboratory confirmation of non-asbestos-containing material is provided in the laboratory results found within Laboratory
Certificates of Analysis.
2 – For sample locations refer to Appendix E: Drawings.

5.2 LEAD
A total of ten (10) paint samples were collected and analyzed at the time of the investigation. The table below
summarizes the results of laboratory analyses for the bulk paint and surface coating samples collected during
the survey.
Table 5 - Summary of Lead Concentrations in Bulk Paint Samples

MATERIAL
ASSESSMENT ACTION1
DESCRIPTION

In general, the following procedures are

recommended if/when removing lead-containing
materials, coatings and paint applications:
— Follow Type 1 – if the coating is to be removed with
a chemical gel or paste;
— Follow Type 2a – if the coating is to be removed by
scraping or sanding using non-powered hand tools,
or manual demolition of lead-painted building
Sample ID: Pb-01
Light brown paint observed components by striking with sledgehammer or
on doors and door frames Concentration: 0.15% similar tool;
throughout the building. — Follow Type 3a – if the coating is to be removed
Condition: Fair to Poor using power tools; or,
— Follow Type 3b – if the coating is to be removed by
abrasive blasting.
If lead-containing paint applications and surface
coatings are not removed prior to demolition,
ensure that demolition waste complies with the
requirements of General – Waste Management
Regulation, R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 347.

Tan/beige paint observed on Sample ID: Pb-02 This material does not contain detectable
walls throughout the concentrations of lead. Therefore, no further action is
building. Concentration: <0.0081% required.

WSP
No 1
 13

MATERIAL
ASSESSMENT ACTION1
DESCRIPTION

Condition: Good

In general, the following procedures are

recommended if/when removing lead-containing
materials, coatings and paint applications:
— Follow Type 1 – if the coating is to be removed with
a chemical gel or paste;
— Follow Type 2a – if the coating is to be removed by
scraping or sanding using non-powered hand tools,
or manual demolition of lead-painted building
Sample ID: Pb-03
Black paint observed on door components by striking with sledgehammer or
frames throughout the Concentration: 0.67% similar tool;
building — Follow Type 3a – if the coating is to be removed
Condition: Good using power tools; or,
— Follow Type 3b – if the coating is to be removed by
abrasive blasting.
If lead-containing paint applications and surface
coatings are not removed prior to demolition,
ensure that demolition waste complies with the
requirements of General – Waste Management
Regulation, R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 347.

Sample ID: Pb-04

This material does not contain detectable
Dark blue paint observed on
Concentration: <0.0087% concentrations of lead. Therefore, no further action is
door frames on the exit doors.
required.
Condition: Good

Sample ID: Pb-05

Sky blue paint observed on This material does not contain detectable
the concrete block walls Concentration: <0.0090% concentrations of lead. Therefore, no further action is
throughout the building. required.
Condition: Good

Sample ID: Pb-06

Aqua blue paint observed on This material does not contain detectable
the floor in the shower of the Concentration: <0.0081% concentrations of lead. Therefore, no further action is
changeroom #3. required.
Condition: Fair to Poor

In general, the following procedures are

recommended if/when removing lead-containing
materials, coatings and paint applications:
Sample ID: Pb-07
Dark green paint observed on — Follow Type 1 – if the coating is to be removed with
the doors and door frames Concentration: 8.6% a chemical gel or paste;
throughout the building. — Follow Type 2a – if the coating is to be removed by
Condition: Good scraping or sanding using non-powered hand tools,
or manual demolition of lead-painted building
components by striking with sledgehammer or
similar tool;

WSP
No 1
 14

MATERIAL
ASSESSMENT ACTION1
DESCRIPTION

— Follow Type 3a – if the coating is to be removed

using power tools; or,
— Follow Type 3b – if the coating is to be removed by
abrasive blasting.
If lead-containing paint applications and surface
coatings are not removed prior to demolition,
ensure that demolition waste complies with the
requirements of General – Waste Management
Regulation, R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 347.
In general, the following procedures are
recommended if/when removing lead-containing
materials, coatings and paint applications:
— Follow Type 1 – if the coating is to be removed with
a chemical gel or paste;
— Follow Type 2a – if the coating is to be removed by
scraping or sanding using non-powered hand tools,
or manual demolition of lead-painted building
Sample ID: Pb-08
Light green paint observed on components by striking with sledgehammer or
corrugated metal sheet walls Concentration: 0.065% similar tool;
throughout the building. — Follow Type 3a – if the coating is to be removed
Condition: Good using power tools; or,
— Follow Type 3b – if the coating is to be removed by
abrasive blasting.
If lead-containing paint applications and surface
coatings are not removed prior to demolition,
ensure that demolition waste complies with the
requirements of General – Waste Management
Regulation, R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 347.

Sample ID: Pb-09

Red paint observed on This material does not contain detectable
structural beams/trusses in Concentration: <0.014% concentrations of lead. Therefore, no further action is
the garage/storage area. required.
Condition: Good

Sample ID: Pb-10

Brown paint observed on This material does not contain detectable
walls on the 2nd floor of the Concentration: <0.0082% concentrations of lead. Therefore, no further action is
building. required.
Condition: Good

1 For sample ID and concentration levels refer to Appendix A: Analytical Results – Asbestos & Lead.

Lead is also expected to be present in the following building components:

— painted surfaces visually similar to the above noted lead-containing paints;
— in lead acid batteries in emergency lighting throughout the building;
— as a component in ceramic building products such as tiles and bricks;

WSP
No 1
 15

— as a component of the solder on sweated joints between copper pipe and fittings;
— as a component of the solder on wire connections of electric components;
— as a component of solder used to seal the bell fitting of cast iron rain water leader pipes; and
— as a malleable metal sheeting/flashing around roof edges, vent stacks, HVAC fixtures, etc.
Work that will disrupt and/or pulverize (including drilling, cutting, grinding or abrading) confirmed or
suspected lead-containing materials must follow the recommendations provided in the EACO Lead
Abatement Guidelines (dated 2014) or Ministry of Labour Guideline for Lead on Construction Projects, dated
September 2004 (Revised April 2011). In addition, the aforementioned painted surfaces (containing lead)
should be handled with appropriate health and safety precautions so as to comply with requirements of the
Designated Substances regulation, O. Reg. 490/09, and disposal of these materials must also comply with the
requirements of O. Reg. 347 – General – Waste Management.

5.3 OTHER DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
The following table summarizes other Designated Substances and hazardous materials which were also
included in the survey. Identification of these materials and substances were based on visual observations
only, and where appropriate, recommendations and necessary actions have been provided.
All designated substances must be handled in accordance with the appropriate guidelines and regulations.
Designated Substance and Hazardous Material information will require updating as corrective measures are
instituted and materials have been removed from various sections of the building.

ACTION
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FINDINGS
Mercury Mercury is used in thermometers, Although no samples were The presence of mercury within
batteries and some electrical analyzed for mercury, it is assembled units (e.g. fluorescent
switches. It is also used in dental presumed to be present in the light bulbs, piping thermometers,
fillings and in latex paint to protect following building components: and thermostat bulbs) should not
against fungal attack and mildew. — in liquid filled reservoirs in be considered a hazard provided
Mercury vapour is also present as a thermostats and sump pump that the assembled units remain
vapour in fluorescent lights, metal level switches; and sealed and intact. Avoid direct skin
— as a gas in fluorescent light
halide lights and mercury vapour tubes. contact with mercury and avoid
lights. inhalation of mercury vapour.
Dispose of mercury following
applicable legislative
requirements.

WSP
No 1
 16

ACTION
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FINDINGS
Polychlorinated The federal Regulation SOR/2008- The light ballasts throughout the When decommissioned, ballasts
Biphenyls (PCBs) 273 (September 5, 2008) states that surveyed areas were energized at which do not have a “No PCBs”
any solid material containing 50 the time of the survey and indicator on the label,
parts per million (ppm) or more of therefore could not be safely manufacturer’s codes should be
PCBs must be handled as a PCB- examined to determine the compared with Environment
containing material in accordance presence/absence of PCBs. Ballasts Canada’s Identification of Lamp
with all applicable regulations. should be investigated prior to Ballasts Containing PCBs EPS
disposal. Transformers potentially 2/CC/2 (revised).
containing PCBs were observed in
Handle, store and dispose of PCB-
the proposed work areas.
containing materials in
accordance with Federal PCB
Regulation SOR/92-507 and R.R.O.
1990 – Reg. 347 – General – Waste
Management regulations.

Ozone Depleting It is the intention of the federal Beverage coolers and air In the event of removal, the units
Substances (ODSs) government to phase out the use of conditioning/HVAC units were should be recycled following
ODSs by the year 2030 in order to observed within the work areas, Ontario Regulation 189/94,
protect the upper atmosphere. The however the labels were Refrigerants (O. Reg. 189/94), as
MOE has issued Regulation 356 inaccessible at the time of the site amended. All equipment
regarding the use, disposal and investigation. containing ODSs must be serviced
recycling of ODSs. Recapturing of by an individual holding a valid
ODSs during servicing must be done Ozone Depletion Prevention (ODP)
by licensed personnel. Card, issued by the MOE and the
refrigerant drained from the unit
and collected for recycling or
disposal in accordance with all
applicable legislation.

WSP
No 1
 17

ACTION
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FINDINGS
Silica Silica, or silicon dioxide (SiO2), is the Crystalline Silica should be O. Reg. 490/09 regarding silica as a
basic component of sand, quartz and assumed to be present in brick, designated substance applies to
granite rock. Crystalline Silica (the concrete, asphalt, cement and areas where airborne silica is
designated substance) is mortar. present and where workers are
encountered in industry in three likely to inhale, ingest or absorb
forms: quartz, tridymite, and silica. Every precaution and
cristobalite. procedure should be taken during
demolition or renovation activities
to control the time-weighted
exposure of a worker to airborne
silica and exposure should not
exceed 0.05 milligrams Cristobalite
per cubic meters of air, or 0.1
milligrams Quartz or Tripoli per
cubic meters of air.

Coring, sawing, or breaking up the

materials containing silica should
be completed only with
appropriate dust suppression
methods, proper respiratory
protection and general worker
safety precautions as outlined in
the MOL Guidance document and
in the Occupational Health and
Safety Act.

Radioactive Smoke/heat detectors may contain a Smoke/heat detectors were In accordance with the Canadian
Materials radioactive power source. observed throughout the surveyed Nuclear Safety Commission
building. (CNSC), if smoke alarms contains
radium or if more than 10 units
have to be disposed of, then the
smoke detectors must be disposed
of at a low-level radioactive waste
management facility. Smoke
detectors containing Am-241
isotope source of less than 5.0 µCi
can be disposed of at a regular
landfill site.

WSP
No 1
 18

ACTION
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FINDINGS

Mould Mould is a group of various species Visible mould and water-damage Mould contaminated materials
of simple, microscopic organisms was observed on building should be removed/handled in
found in every ecological niche, materials in select areas accordance with the Canadian
indoors and outdoors. Moulds are throughout the building. Construction Association
necessary for recycling of organic document CCA 82/2004.
materials in nature. Contractors should be warned of
To grow, mould needs: the presence of mould and every
— A mould spore precaution should be taken to
— An organic food source (i.e. prevent airborne exposure to
paper, drywall, wood, dirt, workers where mould is present
paint, etc.) and where workers are likely to
— Moisture inhale or ingest mould.
— Time (this will vary depending
on the site-specific conditions,
including the cleanliness of the
water source)

Arsenic Arsenic is used with other metals Arsenic may be present as an N/A
(chiefly copper, lead and zinc) to additive in lead-containing paints.
make alloys. Arsenic compounds are
also used in pigments, animal
poisons, insecticides, paints,
wallpaper, ceramics, and poison
gases for chemical warfare, glass
making, in calico and indigo
printing, pyrotechnics, integrated
circuits and transistors. Arsenic is
also a major waste material from the
gold mining industry.

Vinyl Chloride Vinyl chloride is the parent No solvents, tanks or process N/A
compound of polyvinyl chloride operations that use vinyl chloride
(PVC) which is a widely used plastic. were observed or appear to have
Vinyl chloride is also used in various been present in the surveyed area.
resins (e.g. plastic food wrap), and in Vinyl chloride could be present
the glass, rubber, and paper within plastic components of the
industries. Vinyl chloride is also plumbing system, vinyl flooring
formed by the degradation of the and countertops, etc.
chlorinated solvents
trichloroethylene (TCE), 1,1,1-
trichloroethane (111TCA) and
tetrachloroethylene (also known as
perchloroethylene or dry cleaning
solvent), especially in soil or
groundwater that has been
contaminated with these solvents.

WSP
No 1
 19

ACTION
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FINDINGS

Acrylonitrile Acrylonitrile is mostly used as a Acrylonitrile is not expected to be N/A

feedstock or chemical aid in the present in the surveyed areas.
production of nitrile-butadiene
rubber and in acrylonitrile-
butadiene-styrene and styrene-
acrylonitrile polymers. Acrylonitrile
is also used to make other chemicals
such as plastics, synthetic rubber,
and acrylic fibre (e.g. clothing,
blankets, carpeting) and nitrile
rubber for oil-resistant hoses.

Benzene Benzene is widely used in the Benzene is not expected to be N/A

chemical industry as a starting present in the surveyed areas.
material and solvent. Benzene
occurs naturally in crude oil and is
present in all gasoline products,
automobile emissions and cigarette
smoke. Benzene is highly volatile,
and will release into the atmosphere
over a short time.

Coke Oven Coke oven emissions are complex Coke oven emissions are not N/A
Emissions mixtures of coal and coke particles, expected to be present in the
various vapors, gases and tars surveyed areas.
emitted during carbonization of coal
to produce coke. The primary use of
coke (pure carbon) is in the
manufacture of iron and steel. Coke
is also used to synthesize calcium
carbide and to manufacture graphite
and electrodes.

Ethylene Oxide Ethylene Oxide is an extremely Ethylene Oxide is not expected to N/A
flammable gas used in the be present in the surveyed areas.
manufacture of several industrial
chemicals including textiles,
detergents, polyurethane foam,
antifreeze (especially ethylene
glycol), solvents, medicinal products,
adhesives, and other related
products. It is also used as a
fumigant and as a sterilizing agent
for food (spices), cosmetics, and
surgical tool and plastic devices in
hospitals as an alternative to steam.

WSP
No 1
 20

ACTION
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FINDINGS

Isocyanates Isocyanates are the raw materials Isocyanates are not expected to be N/A
from which all polyurethane present in the surveyed areas.
products are made. Isocyanates are
widely used in the manufacture of
flexible and rigid foams, fibres,
coatings such as paints and
varnishes, elastomers, and also in
materials used in auto body repair
and building insulation.

Radon Radon is a radioactive gas naturally No testing for radon was Air testing is the only method to
emitted from the earth through the conducted as part of this determine if Radon is present
breakdown of uranium in soil. It assessment. within the building. It is
enters buildings by seeping in recommended that the building be
through cracks, pipes, windows and tested for Radon.
the foundation etc.

Ammonia Ammonia is a common refrigerant Ammonia was observed onsite at It is recommended that the
used in ice manufacturing. the time of the site investigation. ammonia be stored, maintained
Anhydrous ammonia, either as liquid and handled in accordance with
or gas, is a strong irritant to skin, the Boiler and Pressure Vessels
eyes and the respiratory tract. Direct Regulation, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 59 as
exposure by contact can cause well as the CSA B-52 Mechanical
severe burns. Refrigeration Code (MRC).

WSP
No 1
 21

6 LIMITATIONS
As this survey was generally non-destructive in nature, asbestos could be present in areas not accessible to the
surveyors for identification. Contractors and maintenance personnel should be warned of the possibility of
unidentified materials when breaking into enclosed areas. Suspect friable and non-friable building materials
discovered in these areas should be treated as asbestos until proven otherwise. Materials equivalent or
identical in description to those listed in Table 3, should be considered to be ACM and handled appropriately.
This report is prepared for the sole use of Township of Chatsworth, who are responsible for its distribution to
any third parties. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made
based on it, are the responsibility of the third party. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this
assessment report are based upon professional opinions with regard to the subject matter. These opinions are
in accordance with currently accepted industry practices for asbestos surveys and regulatory requirements for
sampling and identifying asbestos and are subject to the following inherent limitations:
1. The data and findings presented in this report are valid as of the date(s) of the investigation only. The
passage of time, manifestation of latent conditions or occurrence of future events may warrant further
exploration of the Site, analysis of the data, and re-evaluation of the findings, observations, and
conclusions expressed in this report.
2. The findings, observations, conclusions, and recommendations expressed by WSP Canada Inc. in this
report do not represent an opinion concerning compliance of any past or present owner or operator
of the Site with any federal, provincial or local laws or regulations.
3. WSP Canada Inc.’s assessment presents professional opinions and findings of a scientific and technical
nature. While attempts were made to relate the data and findings to applicable environmental and
occupational health & safety laws and regulations, the report shall not be construed to offer legal
opinion or representations as to the requirements of, nor compliance with, environmental and
occupational health and safety laws, rules, regulations or policies of federal, provincial, or local
governmental agencies. WSP Canada Inc. liability extends only to its client and not to other parties
who may obtain this assessment report. Issues raised by the report should be reviewed by appropriate
legal counsel.

WSP
No 1
APPENDIX

A ANALYTICAL RESULTS – ASBESTOS & LEAD

 EMSL Canada Inc. EMSL Canada Order 551809935
Customer ID:
ID:
55SPLC25
2756 Slough Street Mississauga, ON L4T 1G3 Customer PO: 181-11748-00
Phone/Fax: (289) 997-4602 / (289) 997-4607 Project ID:
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]

Attn: Danielle Vella Phone: (416) 798-0065

WSP Canada Inc. Fax:
51 Constellation Court Collected: 8/22/2018
Toronto, ON M9W 1K4 Received: 8/23/2018
Analyzed: 8/30/2018
Proj: 181-11748-00 Keady and Desboro Arena

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via
EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID: AS 1-1 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0001
Sample Description: Below Ceiling - Front Entrance/2x4 Ceiling Tile - Fissures with Sparse Pindots

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Gray/White 60% 40% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 1-2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0002

Sample Description: Below Ceiling - Front Entrance/2x4 Ceiling Tile - Fissures with Sparse Pindots

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Gray/White 60% 40% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 1-3 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0003

Sample Description: Below Ceiling - Front Entrance/2x4 Ceiling Tile - Fissures with Sparse Pindots

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/30/2018 Gray/White 80% 20% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 2-1 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0004

Sample Description: Below Ceiling - Front Entrance/2x4 Ceiling Tile - Fissures with Many Pindots

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Gray/White 60% 40% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 2-2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0005

Sample Description: Below Ceiling - Front Entrance/2x4 Ceiling Tile - Fissures with Many Pindots

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Gray/White 60% 40% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 2-3 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0006

Sample Description: Below Ceiling - Front Entrance/2x4 Ceiling Tile - Fissures with Many Pindots

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/30/2018 Gray/White 80% 20% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 3 -1 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0007

Sample Description: Below Ceiling - Front Entrance/2x4 Ceiling Tile - Fissures with Few Pindots

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Gray/White 30% 70% None Detected

Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.32.2.D Printed: 8/30/2018 12:32PM Page 1 of 10

 EMSL Canada Inc. EMSL Canada Order 551809935
Customer ID:
ID:
55SPLC25
2756 Slough Street Mississauga, ON L4T 1G3 Customer PO: 181-11748-00
Phone/Fax: (289) 997-4602 / (289) 997-4607 Project ID:
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via
EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID: AS 3 -2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0008
Sample Description: Below Ceiling - Front Entrance/2x4 Ceiling Tile - Fissures with Few Pindots

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Gray/White 35% 65% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 3 -3 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0009

Sample Description: Below Ceiling - Front Entrance/2x4 Ceiling Tile - Fissures with Few Pindots

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/30/2018 Gray/White 80% 20% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 4-1 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0010

Sample Description: Below Ceiling - Front Entrance/2x4 Ceiling Tile - Small Fissures with Pindots

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Gray/White 50% 50% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 4-2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0011

Sample Description: Below Ceiling - Front Entrance/2x4 Ceiling Tile - Small Fissures with Pindots

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Gray/White 50% 50% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 4-3 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0012

Sample Description: Below Ceiling - Front Entrance/2x4 Ceiling Tile - Small Fissures with Pindots

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/30/2018 Gray/White 80% 20% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 5-1 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0013

Sample Description: Interior Walls - Front Entrance/Drywall Joint Compound

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 White 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 5-2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0014

Sample Description: Interior Walls - Hall/Drywall Joint Compound

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 White 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 5-3 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0015

Sample Description: Interior Walls - Vestibule Entrane to Hall/Drywall Joint Compound

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 White 0% 100% None Detected

Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.32.2.D Printed: 8/30/2018 12:32PM Page 2 of 10

 EMSL Canada Inc. EMSL Canada Order 551809935
Customer ID:
ID:
55SPLC25
2756 Slough Street Mississauga, ON L4T 1G3 Customer PO: 181-11748-00
Phone/Fax: (289) 997-4602 / (289) 997-4607 Project ID:
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via
EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID: AS 5-4 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0016
Sample Description: Interior Walls - Hall around Window/Drywall Joint Compound

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 White 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 5-5 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0017

Sample Description: Interior Walls - Stairs to 2nd Floor/Drywall Joint Compound

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/30/2018 White 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 6-1-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0018

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 1/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Off - White with Black Streaks
and Associated Black Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 White 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 6-1-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0018A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 1/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Off - White with Black Streaks
and Associated Black Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Black 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 6-2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0019

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 1/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Off - White with Black Streaks
and Associated Black Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 White 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 6-2-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0019A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 1/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Off - White with Black Streaks
and Associated Black Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/30/2018 Black 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 6-3-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0020

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 1/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Off - White with Black Streaks
and Associated Black Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/30/2018 White 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 6-3-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0020A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 1/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Off - White with Black Streaks
and Associated Black Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/30/2018 Black 0% 100% None Detected

Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.32.2.D Printed: 8/30/2018 12:32PM Page 3 of 10

 EMSL Canada Inc. EMSL Canada Order 551809935
Customer ID:
ID:
55SPLC25
2756 Slough Street Mississauga, ON L4T 1G3 Customer PO: 181-11748-00
Phone/Fax: (289) 997-4602 / (289) 997-4607 Project ID:
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via
EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID: AS 7-1-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0021
Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Tan with Beige/Brown Blots and Associated Black
Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Beige 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 7-1-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0021A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Tan with Beige/Brown Blots and Associated Black
Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Black 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 7-2-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0022

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Tan with Beige/Brown Blots and Associated Black
Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 White 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 7-2-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0022A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Tan with Beige/Brown Blots and Associated Black
Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Black 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 7-3-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0023

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Tan with Beige/Brown Blots and Associated Black
Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/30/2018 Beige 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 7-3-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0023A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Tan with Beige/Brown Blots and Associated Black
Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Black 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 8-1 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0024

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 2/Yellow Mastic on Flooring

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Yellow 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 8-2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0025

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 2/Yellow Mastic on Flooring

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Yellow 0.0% 100% None Detected

Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.32.2.D Printed: 8/30/2018 12:32PM Page 4 of 10

 EMSL Canada Inc. EMSL Canada Order 551809935
Customer ID:
ID:
55SPLC25
2756 Slough Street Mississauga, ON L4T 1G3 Customer PO: 181-11748-00
Phone/Fax: (289) 997-4602 / (289) 997-4607 Project ID:
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via
EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID: AS 8-3 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0026
Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 2/Yellow Mastic on Flooring

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/30/2018 Yellow 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 9-1 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0027

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 2/Green Floor Coating

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Green 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 9-2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0028

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 2/Green Floor Coating

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Green 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 9-3 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0029

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 2/Green Floor Coating

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/30/2018 Green 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 10 -1 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0030

Sample Description: Interior Sink - Servery/Gold Sink Backing

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Gold 0% 97% 3% Chrysotile

Client Sample ID: AS 10 -2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0031

Sample Description: Interior Sink - Servery/Gold Sink Backing

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)

Client Sample ID: AS 10 -3 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0032

Sample Description: Interior Sink - Servery/Gold Sink Backing

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)

Client Sample ID: AS 11-1 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0033

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Changeroom 3/Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Grey with Light Grey Streaks

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Gray 0.0% 100% None Detected

Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.32.2.D Printed: 8/30/2018 12:32PM Page 5 of 10

 EMSL Canada Inc. EMSL Canada Order 551809935
Customer ID:
ID:
55SPLC25
2756 Slough Street Mississauga, ON L4T 1G3 Customer PO: 181-11748-00
Phone/Fax: (289) 997-4602 / (289) 997-4607 Project ID:
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via
EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID: AS 11-2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0034
Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Changeroom 3/Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Grey with Light Grey Streaks

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Gray 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 11-3 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0035

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Changeroom 3/Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Grey with Light Grey Streaks

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/30/2018 Gray 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 12-1-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0036

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 3/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Off- White with Black/Brown
Streaks; Associated Black Mastic and Leveling Compound
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Beige 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 12-1-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0036A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 3/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Off- White with Black/Brown
Streaks; Associated Black Mastic and Leveling Compound
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Black 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 12-2-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0037

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 3/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Off- White with Black/Brown
Streaks; Associated Black Mastic and Leveling Compound
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Beige 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 12-2-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0037A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 3/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Off- White with Black/Brown
Streaks; Associated Black Mastic and Leveling Compound
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Black 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 12-3-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0038

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 3/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Off- White with Black/Brown
Streaks; Associated Black Mastic and Leveling Compound
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/30/2018 Beige 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 12-3-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0038A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - Hall Storage Room 3/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Off- White with Black/Brown
Streaks; Associated Black Mastic and Leveling Compound
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/30/2018 Black 0.0% 100% None Detected

Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.32.2.D Printed: 8/30/2018 12:32PM Page 6 of 10

 EMSL Canada Inc. EMSL Canada Order 551809935
Customer ID:
ID:
55SPLC25
2756 Slough Street Mississauga, ON L4T 1G3 Customer PO: 181-11748-00
Phone/Fax: (289) 997-4602 / (289) 997-4607 Project ID:
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via
EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID: AS 13-1 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0039
Sample Description: Interior - Arena/White Coating on Board of Ice Rink

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Beige 5% 95% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 13-2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0040

Sample Description: Interior - Arena/White Coating on Board of Ice Rink

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Beige 5% 95% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 13-3 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0041

Sample Description: Interior - Arena/White Coating on Board of Ice Rink

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/30/2018 Beige 5% 95% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 14-1-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0042

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Mezzanine/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Tan with White and Grey Specks
and Associated Grey Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Gray 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 14-1-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0042A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Mezzanine/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Tan with White and Grey Specks
and Associated Grey Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Gray 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 14-2-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0043

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Mezzanine/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Tan with White and Grey Specks
and Associated Grey Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Gray 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 14-2-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0043A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Mezzanine/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Tan with White and Grey Specks
and Associated Grey Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Gray 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 14-3-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0044

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Mezzanine/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Tan with White and Grey Specks
and Associated Grey Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/30/2018 Gray 0.0% 100% None Detected

Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.32.2.D Printed: 8/30/2018 12:32PM Page 7 of 10

 EMSL Canada Inc. EMSL Canada Order 551809935
Customer ID:
ID:
55SPLC25
2756 Slough Street Mississauga, ON L4T 1G3 Customer PO: 181-11748-00
Phone/Fax: (289) 997-4602 / (289) 997-4607 Project ID:
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via
EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID: AS 14-3-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0044A
Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Mezzanine/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile - Tan with White and Grey Specks
and Associated Grey Mastic
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/30/2018 Gray 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 15-1 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0045

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Room 2/Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Square Pattern with Paper Backing

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Beige 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 15-2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0046

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Room 2/Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Square Pattern with Paper Backing

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Beige 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 15-3 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0047

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Room 2/Vinyl Sheet Flooring - Square Pattern with Paper Backing

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/30/2018 Beige 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 16-1-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0048

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Room 2/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile and Associated Yellow Mastic;
Underneath the Vinyl Sheet Flooring
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Tan 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 16-1-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0048A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Room 2/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile and Associated Yellow Mastic;
Underneath the Vinyl Sheet Flooring
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Black 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 16-2-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0049

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Room 2/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile and Associated Yellow Mastic;
Underneath the Vinyl Sheet Flooring
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/29/2018 Tan 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 16-2-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0049A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Room 2/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile and Associated Yellow Mastic;
Underneath the Vinyl Sheet Flooring
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Black 0% 100% None Detected

Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.32.2.D Printed: 8/30/2018 12:32PM Page 8 of 10

 EMSL Canada Inc. EMSL Canada Order 551809935
Customer ID:
ID:
55SPLC25
2756 Slough Street Mississauga, ON L4T 1G3 Customer PO: 181-11748-00
Phone/Fax: (289) 997-4602 / (289) 997-4607 Project ID:
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via
EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID: AS 16-3-Floor Tile Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0050
Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Room 2/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile and Associated Yellow Mastic;
Underneath the Vinyl Sheet Flooring
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM Grav. Reduction 8/30/2018 Tan 0.0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 16-3-Mastic Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0050A

Sample Description: Interior Flooring - 2nd Floor Room 2/12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile and Associated Yellow Mastic;
Underneath the Vinyl Sheet Flooring
Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Black 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 17-1 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0051

Sample Description: Exterior - Main Entrance/Grey Mortar on Exterior Wall

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Gray 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 17-2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0052

Sample Description: Exterior - Main Entrance/Grey Mortar on Exterior Wall

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Gray 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 17-3 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0053

Sample Description: Exterior - Main Entrance/Grey Mortar on Exterior Wall

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/30/2018 Gray 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 18-1 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0054

Sample Description: Exterior - Wall/White Firestop around Conduit

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Gray 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 18-2 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0055

Sample Description: Exterior - Wall/White Firestop around Conduit

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/29/2018 Gray 0% 100% None Detected

Client Sample ID: AS 18-3 Lab Sample ID: 551809935-0056

Sample Description: Exterior - Wall/White Firestop around Conduit

Analyzed Non-Asbestos
TEST Date Color Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos Comment
PLM 8/30/2018 Gray 0% 100% None Detected

Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.32.2.D Printed: 8/30/2018 12:32PM Page 9 of 10

 EMSL Canada Inc. EMSL Canada Order 551809935
Customer ID:
ID:
55SPLC25
2756 Slough Street Mississauga, ON L4T 1G3 Customer PO: 181-11748-00
Phone/Fax: (289) 997-4602 / (289) 997-4607 Project ID:
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via
EPA600/R-93/116 Method

Analyst(s):
Caroline Allen PLM (8)
PLM Grav. Reduction (20)
Ioana Taina PLM (10)
PLM Grav. Reduction (10)
Kira Ramphal PLM (21)

Reviewed and approved by:

Matthew Davis or other approved signatory

or Other Approved Signatory

None Detected = <0.1%. EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may
not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical
method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless
otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP of any agency of the U.S. Government.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Canada Inc. Mississauga, ON NVLAP Lab Code 200877-0
Initial report from: 08/30/201812:32:37

Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.32.2.D Printed: 8/30/2018 12:32PM Page 10 of 10

 EMSL Canada Or 551809908
EMSL Canada Inc. CustomerID: 55SPLC25
2756 Slough Street, Mississauga, ON L4T 1G3
CustomerPO: 181-11748-00
Phone/Fax: (289) 997-4602 / (289) 997-4607
http://www.EMSL.com [email protected] ProjectID:

Attn: Danielle Vella Phone: (416) 798-0065

Fax:
WSP Canada Inc.
Received: 08/23/18 12:00 PM
51 Constellation Court
Collected: 8/22/2018
Toronto, ON M9W 1K4

Project: 181-11748-00 Keady and Desboro Arena

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

Client SampleDescription Collected Analyzed Weight RDL Lead Concentration

Pb-01 8/22/2018 8/29/2018 0.2458 g 0.0081 % wt 0.15 % wt

551809908-0001 Site: Interior
Desc: Light Brown Paint on Doors and Door Frames

Pb-02 8/22/2018 8/29/2018 0.2480 g 0.0081 % wt <0.0081 % wt

551809908-0002 Site: Interior
Desc: Tan/Beige Paint on Walls Throughout

Pb-03 8/22/2018 8/29/2018 0.2331 g 0.043 % wt 0.67 % wt

551809908-0003 Site: Interior - Room 1
Desc: Black Paint on Door Frame

Pb-04 8/22/2018 8/29/2018 0.2287 g 0.0087 % wt <0.0087 % wt

551809908-0004 Site: Interior - Exit Doors
Desc: Dark Blue Paint on Door Frames

Pb-05 8/22/2018 8/29/2018 0.2217 g 0.0090 % wt <0.0090 % wt

551809908-0005 Site: Interior
Desc: Sky Blue on Concrete Block Walls Throoughout

Pb-06 8/22/2018 8/29/2018 0.2467 g 0.0081 % wt <0.0081 % wt

551809908-0006 Site: Interior - Changeroom 3
Desc: Aqua Blue Paint on Flooring in Shower

Pb-07 8/22/2018 8/29/2018 0.2464 g 0.41 % wt 8.6 % wt

551809908-0007 Site: Interior - Garage/Storage
Desc: Dark Green Paint on Arena

Pb-08 8/22/2018 8/29/2018 0.0975 g 0.021 % wt 0.065 % wt

551809908-0008 Site: Interior - Garage/Storage
Desc: Light Green Paint on Conjugated Metal Walls

Rowena Fanto, Lead Supervisor

or other approved signatory

*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.010 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in
this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for
sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of
uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.
Definitions of modifications are available upon request.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Canada Inc. Mississauga, ON A2LA Accredited Environmental Testing Cert #2845.08

Initial report from 08/30/2018 10:28:44

Test Report PB w/RDL-7.32.3 Printed: 8/30/2018 10:28:44 AM Page 1 of 2

 EMSL Canada Or 551809908
EMSL Canada Inc. CustomerID: 55SPLC25
2756 Slough Street, Mississauga, ON L4T 1G3
CustomerPO: 181-11748-00
Phone/Fax: (289) 997-4602 / (289) 997-4607
http://www.EMSL.com [email protected] ProjectID:

Attn: Danielle Vella Phone: (416) 798-0065

Fax:
WSP Canada Inc.
Received: 08/23/18 12:00 PM
51 Constellation Court
Collected: 8/22/2018
Toronto, ON M9W 1K4

Project: 181-11748-00 Keady and Desboro Arena

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

Client SampleDescription Collected Analyzed Weight RDL Lead Concentration

Pb-09 8/22/2018 8/29/2018 0.1461 g 0.014 % wt <0.014 % wt

551809908-0009 Site: Interior - Garage/Storage
Desc: Red Paint on Structural Beams/Trusses
Insufficient sample to reach reporting limit.

Pb-10 8/22/2018 8/29/2018 0.2452 g 0.0082 % wt <0.0082 % wt

551809908-0010 Site: Interior - 2nd Floor
Desc: Brown Paint on Walls

Rowena Fanto, Lead Supervisor

or other approved signatory

*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.010 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in
this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for
sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of
uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.
Definitions of modifications are available upon request.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Canada Inc. Mississauga, ON A2LA Accredited Environmental Testing Cert #2845.08

Initial report from 08/30/2018 10:28:44

Test Report PB w/RDL-7.32.3 Printed: 8/30/2018 10:28:44 AM Page 2 of 2

APPENDIX

B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
 MATERIAL
PHOTO DESCRIPTION &
NO. LOCATION PHOTO

1 Damaged ceiling tiles with

suspect mould and water
staining observed in the
storage/electrical on the
Ground Floor.

2 Damaged ceiling tiles with

suspect mould and water
staining observed in the
entrance area to the building.
 MATERIAL
PHOTO DESCRIPTION &
NO. LOCATION PHOTO

3 View of lead-containing
light brown paint observed
on doors and door frames
throughout the building
(Pb1).

4 View of asbestos-containing
sink backing (Gold) observed
in the servery cabinetry on
the Ground Floor (AS10).
 MATERIAL
PHOTO DESCRIPTION &
NO. LOCATION PHOTO

5 View of lead-containing
dark green paint observed on
doors and door frames
throughout the building.
(Pb7)

6 View of lead-containing
light green paint observed on
corrugated metal sheet on
exterior and interior walls
throughout the building.
(Pb8)
APPENDIX

C EVALUATION CRITERIA
 Appendix C – Asbestos-Containing Material Evaluation Criteria

A description of the criteria used in evaluating the condition, accessibility and exposure risk of asbestos-
containing materials (ACM) is provided below.

Assessment of Condition

Spray-Applied Fireproofing, Insulation and Textured Finishes

In evaluating the condition of ACM spray applied as fireproofing, thermal insulation or texture, decorative or
acoustic finishes, the following criteria apply:

Good
Surface of material shows no significant signs of damage, deterioration or delamination. Up to one percent
visible damage to surface is allowed within range of GOOD. Evaluation of sprayed fireproofing requires the
Assessor to be familiar with the irregular surface texture typical of sprayed asbestos products. GOOD condition
includes unencapsulated or unpainted fireproofing or texture finishes, where no delamination or damage is
observed, and encapsulated fireproofing or texture finishes where the encapsulation has been applied after the
damage or fallout occurred.

Poor
Sprayed materials show signs of damage, delamination or deterioration. More than one percent damage to surface
of ACM spray.

In observation areas, where damage exists in isolated locations, both GOOD and POOR condition may be reported.
The extent or percentage of each condition will be recorded on the Assessor reassessment form.

FAIR condition is not utilized or considered as a valid criterion in the evaluation of sprayed fireproofing, sprayed
insulation, or texture coat finishes.

The evaluation of ACM spray applied as fireproofing, non-mechanical thermal insulation, or texture,
decorative or acoustic finishes which are present above ceilings, may be limited by the number of
observations made, and by building components such as ducts or full height walls that obstruct the above ceiling
observations. Persons entering the ceiling area are advised to be watchful for ACM DEBRIS prior to accessing or
working above ceilings in areas of building with ACM, regardless of the reported condition.

Other ACM

In evaluating the condition of mechanical insulation (on boilers, breaching, ductwork, piping, tanks,
equipment etc.) the following criteria are used:

Good
Insulation is completely covered in jacketing and exhibits no evidence of damage or deterioration. No insulation
is exposed. Includes conditions where the jacketing has minor surface damage (i.e., scuffs or stains), but the
jacketing is not penetrated.

Fair
Minor penetration damage to jacketed insulation (cuts, tears, nicks, deterioration or delamination) or
undamaged insulation that has never been jacketed. Insulation is exposed but not showing surface
disintegration. The extent of missing insulation ranges should be minor to none.

Poor
Original insulation jacket is missing, damaged, deteriorated or delaminated. Insulation is exposed and significant
areas have been dislodged. Damage cannot be readily repaired. The evaluation of mechanical insulation may be
limited by the number of observations made and building components such as ducts or full height walls that
obstruct observations. In these circumstances, it is not possible to observe each foot of mechanical insulation
from all angles.
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey WSP
 Appendix C – Asbestos-Containing Material Evaluation Criteria

Non-Friable and Potentially Friable Materials

Non-friable materials generally have little potential to release airborne fibres, even when damaged by
mechanical breakage. However, some non-friable materials, i.e., exterior asbestos cement products, may have
deteriorated so that the binder no longer effectively contains the asbestos fibres. In such cases of significantly
deteriorated non-friable material, the material will be treated as a friable product.

Evaluation of Accessibility

The accessibility of building materials known or suspected of being ACM is rated according to the following
criteria:

Access (A)
Areas of the building within reach of all building users. Includes areas such as gymnasiums, workshops, and
storage areas where activities of the building users may result in disturbance of ACM not normally within reach
from floor level.

Access (B)
Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladder. Includes:
frequently entered pipe chases, tunnels and service areas or areas within reach from a fixed ladder or catwalk,
i.e., tops of equipment, mezzanines.

Access (C) Exposed

Areas of the building above 8'0" where use of a ladder is required to reach the ACM. Only refers to ACM materials
that are exposed to view, from the floor or ladder, without removing or opening other building components
such as ceiling tiles, or service access doors or hatches. Does not include infrequently accessed service areas of
the building.

Access (C) Concealed

Areas of the building which require the removal of a building component, including lay-in ceilings and access
panels into solid ceiling systems. Includes rarely entered crawl spaces, attic spaces, etc. Observations are
limited to the extent visible from the access points.

Access (D)
Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc. where
demolition of the ceiling, wall or equipment, etc., is required to reach the ACM. Evaluation of the condition and
extent of ACM is limited or impossible, depending on the Assessor's ability to visually examine the materials
in Access D.

Definition of Action Levels

Based on the results of the inspection and bulk sample analysis of samples collected and submitted for testing,
recommendations were provided for compliance with regulation. These include assigned “Action Levels” to assist
in the prioritization of corrective measures. The measures that are to be taken for each “Action Level” are
described in full in the following table:

Action Level Required Action

Immediate Clean-Up of Debris that is Likely to Be Disturbed

Restrict access that is likely to cause a disturbance of the ACM DEBRIS and clean up
“Action 1”
ACM DEBRIS immediately. Utilize correct asbestos procedures. This action is required
for compliance with regulatory requirements. The surveyor will immediately notify
the owner of this condition.

Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey WSP

 Appendix C – Asbestos-Containing Material Evaluation Criteria

Type 2 Precautions for Entry into Areas with ACM DEBRIS

At locations where ACM DEBRIS can be isolated in lieu of removal or cleaned up, use
“Action 2” appropriate means to limit entry to the area. Restrict access to the area to persons
utilizing Type 2 asbestos precautions. The precautions will be required until the ACM
DEBRIS has been cleaned up, and the source of the DEBRIS has been stabilized or
removed.
ACM Removal Required for Compliance
“Action 3”
Remove ACM for compliance with regulatory requirements. Utilize asbestos
procedures appropriate to the scope of the removal work.
Type 2 Precautions for Access into Areas Where ACM is Present and Likely to
be Disturbed by Access
“Action 4”
Use Type 2 asbestos precautions when entry or access into an area is likely to disturb
the ACM. ACTION 4 must be used until the ACM is removed (Use ACTION 1 or 2 if
DEBRIS is present).
Proactive ACM Removal
“Action 5”
Remove ACM in lieu of repair, or at locations where the presence of asbestos in
GOOD condition is not desirable.
ACM Repair

Repair ACM found in FAIR condition, and not likely to be damaged again or disturbed by
“Action 6”
normal use of the area or room. Upon completion of the repair work, treat ACM as
material in GOOD condition and implement ACTION 7. If ACM is likely to be damaged or
disturbed, during normal use of the area or room, implement ACTION 5.
Asbestos Management Program with Routine Surveillance

“Action 7” Implement an Asbestos Management Program, including routine surveillance of

ACM. Trained workers or contractors must use appropriate asbestos precautions
(Type 1, Type 2 or Type 3) during disturbance of the remaining ACM.

Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey WSP

APPENDIX

D GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Accessibility: The terms easily accessible, less accessible, and inaccessible are used to describe the ease with which
asbestos can be accessed by tenants, the public, employees and contractors in the building. Easily accessible
indicates that ACM is visible from the floor and can be touched by building occupants, and therefore has a potential
for significant damage. Less accessible indicates that ACM is not visible from the floor, or if it is visible, it is high
enough not to be touched by building occupants, and has a potential for damage. Inaccessible indicates that ACM
is located behind masonry, drywall, or other types of solid enclosures and is only accessible after destruction of the
enclosure, and has a low potential for damage.
ACM: Asbestos-Containing Material. A material that contains greater than 0.5% asbestos by dry weight as per
Ontario Regulation 278/05 and is used to refer to the vastly different types of such material.
Amosite: The technical name for ‘brown’ asbestos.
AMP: Asbestos Management Plan
Asbestos: A mineral fiber that can pollute air or water and cause cancer or asbestosis when inhaled.
Asbestos Abatement: Procedures to control fiber release from asbestos-containing materials in a building or to
remove them entirely, including removal, encapsulation, repair, enclosure, encasement, and operations and
maintenance programs.
Asbestos Cement: A hard product that contains up to 15% asbestos fibres which can be any of the three main types.
This is a relatively safe material provided it remains intact as the cement binds the asbestos fibres; breakage will
lead to fibre release. When used for roofing the risks to operatives are far greater from falls than asbestos exposure.
Asbestos Control: Minimizing the generation of airborne asbestos fibres until a permanent solution is developed.
Asbestos Debris: Pieces of an ACM that can be identified by color, texture, or composition, or means dust, if the
dust is determined by an accredited inspector to be ACM.
Asbestos Fibres: Fibres with their length being greater than five microns (length to width ratio of 3:1), generated
from an asbestos-containing material.
BAS: Building Asbestos Supervisor.
Bulk Sample: A sample of material such as boarding, insulation or debris taken by an accredited surveyor to be
tested for asbestos fibre content by an accredited laboratory.
Chrysotile: The technical name for ‘white’ asbestos.
Condition: The condition of ACM is described using the designations: good, fair and poor. Good refers to ACM with
no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limited damage or deterioration. Fair refers to ACM with
some damage or deterioration (less than 10% of the material). Poor refer to ACM that is significantly damaged or
deteriorated (at least 10% of the material).
CRD: Construction, Renovation and/or Demolition related activities.
Crocidolite: The technical name for ‘blue’ asbestos.
Designated Substances Regulations: A series of Regulations made by the Ministry of Labour under the
Occupational Health and Safety Act. The regulations provide management protocols and guidelines to the following
eleven substances: acrylonitrile, arsenic, asbestos, benzene, coke oven emissions, ethylene oxide, isocyanates, lead,
mercury, silica and vinyl chloride.
Demolition: Complete dismantling or the complete or partial destruction of a building, structure, ship or plant
such that it cannot be used in that form again.
Friable ACM: Any material that contains more than 0.5% asbestos by weight and can be crumbled, pulverized, or
reduced to powder by the pressure of an ordinary human hand.
HEPA Filter: High Efficiency Particulate Air Filter.
Homogeneous Area: Defined by the US EPA as containing material that is uniform in texture and appearance, was
installed at one time and is unlikely to consist of more than one type or formulation of material.
Major Action: All response actions requiring Type 3 ACM Removal Procedures, or Type 2 Removal Procedures
involving the removal of friable ACM and provisions of an enclosure.
Management Survey: A survey carried out without disturbing any part of the fabric, components or finishes.
Samples may be taken.
MOL: Ministry of Labour.
O&M: Operations and Maintenance Program.
O. Reg.: Ontario Regulations.
Non-Friable ACM: Any material that contains more than 0.5% asbestos by weight but cannot be pulverized under
hand pressure.
PACM: Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials. All thermal system insulation, surfacing material and
asphalt/vinyl flooring in a building constructed prior to 1981 that has not been appropriately tested are presumed
asbestos containing materials.
PPE: Personal Protective Equipment such as overalls, masks, gloves etc.
Pre-Demolition Survey: A survey similar to the Refurbishment Survey but also taking core samples from
partitions, lifting floorboards and investigating back to the structure where possible.
Refurbishment Survey: A survey similar to the Management Survey but also involves entering into accessible
ducts, suspended ceilings and other accessible voids. Samples are almost always taken.
RPE: Respiratory Protective Equipment. The different types of face masks worn appropriate to the risk. Where the
risk assessment shows that the Control Limit will be exceeded RPE must be worn.
Surveyor: Any person who contracts to provide professional health and safety services relating to asbestos-
containing construction material. The activities of a surveyor include building inspection, abatement project
design, contract administration, sample collection, preparation of asbestos management plans, clearance
monitoring, and supervision of site surveillance technicians.
Type 1: Asbestos Abatement Operation with ACM as an operation described by O. Reg. 278/05 in subsection 12 (2),
generally an operation that does not cause asbestos fibres to become airborne.
Type 2: Asbestos Abatement Operation with ACM as an operation described by O. Reg. 278/05 in subsection 12 (3),
generally a major operation with limited scope of work.
Type 3: Asbestos Abatement Operation with ACM as an operation described by O. Reg. 278/05 in subsection 12 (4),
generally a major operation.
APPENDIX

E DRAWINGS
 Pb4 Pb6
AS11

* * Pb8 Pb7
Pb9
T:\Environmental\000 181-00000-00\181-11748-00 - Keady and Desboro Arenas DSS\03 Drawings\Township of Chatsworth, Desboro and Keady Community Centres.dwg

*
Pb5

* *
AS12

* * * *
AS5-4
AS5-2

Hall
AS7
* * Storage 3
AS8
AS5-5

* **
AS6
Storage 2
AS9

* Storage 1

* AS5-3

AS5-2 * Pb1

Servery
Pb2
*
*
AS13

* Pb3

* *
AS1,2,3,4

*
AS10

* *
Storage

Main Entrance AS5-1 AS18

* AS17 Notes:
1. This drawing must be read in conjunction with associated report.
2. Drawing was based on WSP's field observations.
3. Asbestos-containing materials may be present in inaccessible areas
throughout the building.
4. Asbestos-containing gold sink backing is present throughout the building.

Legend:
Client: Project No.: 181-11748-00 Drawing No.: 1.0

***
Township of Chatsworth
Negative Asbestos Result
Drawn: PB Approved: EK Title: Sample Locations - Ground Floor
Asbestos-Containing Result
No Detectable Concentrations of Lead Date: September 2018 Scale: NTS Project: Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey

*
Keady Community Centre, Tara, ON
Lead-Containing Result
Original Rev: N/A 51 ConstellationCourt
Letter Toronto, Ontario M9W 1K4, Canada
Size: T: 416-798-0065
T:\Environmental\000 181-00000-00\181-11748-00 - Keady and Desboro Arenas DSS\03 Drawings\Township of Chatsworth, Desboro and Keady Community Centres.dwg

AS15
AS16

* Room 2
AS14
Pb10

Room 1 * *

Notes:
1. This drawing must be read in conjunction with associated report.
2. Drawing was based on WSP's field observations.
3. Asbestos-containing materials may be present in inaccessible
areas throughout the building.

Legend:
Client: Project No.: 181-11748-00 Drawing No.: 2.0

**
Township of Chatsworth
Negative Asbestos Result
Drawn: PB Approved: EK Title: Sample Locations - Second Floor
No Detectable Concentrations of Lead
Date: September 2018 Scale: NTS Project: Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey
Keady Community Centre, Tara, ON
Original Rev: N/A 51 ConstellationCourt
Letter Toronto, Ontario M9W 1K4, Canada
Size: T: 416-798-0065
Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

APPENDIX

B
Building History Questionnaire

September 2018
\\\l) BU I LDINC MAt NTENANCE-H tSTORy QU ESTTON NAt R E

NAME oF FActLtrY t {E^r,( G^ 'tr, oV C* O*

/
NAME OF RESPONDENT: /** lL*o*oJ
The purpose of this questionnaire is to gather bosic facility information including construction history,
typicol uses and operation schedule, and known deficiencies. tt sholl be used in conjunction with a
Building Assessment by WSP ønd is meont to augmenl and not replace, the WSP scope of work on the
project.

DISCLAIMER: WSP shall factor in third party responses to the following questions to better inform
engineering judgements thot ore otherwise bosed on WSP's own observations or investigations. WSP
shall not be responsible or accept liobility for the accurocy of the responses. WSP shall not be held
responsible nor held liable for ony and oll damages arising from a failure to pursue deficiencies identified
herein.

Pu r' ¿)
1. Age of Building (or date of original construction): I I 't v ?* s ftt>i>'r'¿)
2-
t.* l-oo
2. Major Repairs, Renovatíons, Alterations, Expansions:
't''xl dl Eltsl- c¿t/'+l?
ZOO ¿ - N.ãì"/ D/â¡g=Sr¿r(. l, Çç1t4Aêé
r'î¿>tln t4'T
NCVJ ul't<¡l'Zoo*¿
Pt-,,ns !õ¿c/za<'ë t¡¿' dr+zz-
S'zt fo
7*;:;-)
\ i'r" 3b rLTo')
H^N['t Lt@
(tun'* t¿âl z'a'-*"e' ) d'r4
\atl - Nã) a\!futõtú Þ¿¿'t-5
A¿-¿*Stß'c

3. Building Uses and Schedule:

(Eg. Sports & Rec, Rentals, Public Meetings etc.; Eg. M-S 10am-10pm)
z*ia'1eftt kvJ¿e'
0.¡ - l\ktt-,* - Y^*: ''k)A'-* z3"L€

z+
lJtk^ îartuwl- Èo(\tçß(?'-g l7 Dut*<w¡' 877-
rrart' íaútpt¿S , ft
-
ttJ€Ds.,.ref ' ,@a'i¿ f -rort*)
'> Åo¿ ' luò4 +
fr¿t¿¿'¿
lnu
- iuúkt¿v¡ þ1L Çrla,ccf
t¡/srnn¡* Qtc't+ - €t
- Pp¡¿*tY 7*'u(ôtavaty , t\tvu'¿¿ntttl7 €Tt)
'Réu ^t'
¿ut
^/uë¿n þ¿ Gi
Page L of 3
\\\lt BU r LDt NC MAt NTENANCE-H tSTORy QU ESTTON NAt RE

4. To the best of your knowledge, does the building have any of the following problems (eg.
complaints received, observations by maintenance/custodíal staff etc.) and, if so, where are
they located?

ARCHITECTURAL
a. Signs of leakage or excessive moisture no longer visible? Ye S - llae¿ €fàt\t'€L'-(*-*)
CIVIL
b. Site drainage problems? Ya *
Nèørrt æ ßvtr-o,,^r¡,, ß¡+,-,- âezo
c. Septic problems? No
STRUCÏURAL
d. Known structural problems not visíble? tô
MECHANICAL
e. Plumbing leaks? ,{P tca /ew,erç1-^
f. Heating capacity or dístribution deficienc ies? /e t - ut ?s'ívt¿¿t , #' ¡€<¿¿>î

e. A/C capacity or distribution deficiencies? ,{o

h. lnadequate domestíc water pressure? àþ
ELECTRICAL
i. Electrical problems eg. tripping breakers, insufficient receptacles? ,y'e
j. lnadequate lightíng? ¡lo

5. To the best of your knowledge, does the buílding have any of the following desígnated
substances?
k. Known presence of asbestos? á/2
l. Known presence of lead? ¡/o
m. Known presence of mould? ilO

6. Are there any ínspection repofts avaílable from the past from Fire, Health, Building
Departments?
- f7'*<-tct/ fr¿*t //ern Ll'e'r
[\tt ùæ-tn 'r å-æ*nr ¡

7. Are there any outstandíng orders or directives from Authorities eg. Fire, Health, Buildings
departments? I{o

8. Are there any maintenance plans or schedules: routine inspections, testing, servicing, or
replacements? û

9. Are there any maíntenance logs?

êdvtê'm*noJ tttPute - l¿cs

Page 2 of 3
\\\l) BU r LDt NC MAt NTENANCE-H tSïORY QU ESTTON NAt RE

10. Are there maintenance contracts? 4/"

Fire inspections:
Water treatment:
Electrical maíntenance:
HVAC maintenance:
Refrigeration eq't maintenance:
Boiler maintenance:
Other :

LL. Has there been any restoration or repair work performed during the last 5 years, or currently
planned?
n/ò

12. Has there been any building condition assessment performed in the last 5 years?
ilo

13. Are there As-Built plans and specifications?

(ù A/ts c"'4
'l¿z Wt llf'€t' fl¿p '- fr¡nln't'¿'¿

14. ls there any equipment or materials under warranty?

ilo

15. Any other information you feel should be consídered with respect to a Building Condition
Assessment?
lo

Page 3 of 3
Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

APPENDIX

C
Photographs

September 2018
 Photo A-01 Photo A-02

Photo A-03 Photo A-04

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-1
 Photo A-05 Photo A-06

Photo A-07 Photo A-08

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-2
 Photo A-09 Photo A-10

Photo A-11 Photo A-12

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-3
 Photo A-13 Photo A-14

Photo A-15 Photo A-16

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-4
 Photo A-17 Photo A-18

Photo A-19 Photo A-20

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-5
 Photo A-21 Photo A-22

Photo A-23 Photo A-24

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-6
 Photo A-25 Photo A-26

Photo A-27 Photo A-28

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-7
 Photo A-29 Photo A-30

Photo A-31 Photo A-32

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-8
 Photo A-33 Photo A-34

Photo A-35 Photo A-36

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-9
 Photo A-37 Photo A-38

Photo A-39 Photo A-40

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-10
 Photo A-41 Photo A-42

Photo A-43 Photo A-44

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-11
 Photo A-45 Photo A-46

Photo A-47 Photo A-48

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-12
 Photo A-49 Photo A-50

Photo A-51 Photo A-52

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-13
 Photo A-53 Photo A-54

Photo A-55 Photo A-56

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-14
 Photo A-57 Photo A-58

Photo A-59 Photo A-60

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-15
 Photo A-61 Photo A-62

Photo A-63 Photo A-64

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-16
 Photo A-65 Photo A-66

Photo A-67 Photo A-68

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-17
 Photo A-69 Photo A-70

Photo A-71 Photo A-72

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-18
 Photo A-73 Photo A-74

Photo A-75 Photo A-76

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-19
 Photo A-77

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Center BCA Appendix C – Photographs Page C-20
 Photo S-01 Photo S-02

Photo S-03 Photo S-04

Township of Chatsworth Appendix C – Photographs Page C-21
Keady Community Centre BCA
 Photo S-05 Photo S-06

Photo S-07 Photo S-08

Township of Chatsworth Appendix C – Photographs Page C-22

Keady Community Centre BCA
 Photo S-09 Photo S-10

Photo S-11 Photo S-12

Township of Chatsworth Appendix C – Photographs Page C-23

Keady Community Centre BCA
 Photo S-13 Photo S-14

Photo S-15 Photo S-16

Township of Chatsworth Appendix C – Photographs Page C-24

Keady Community Centre BCA
 Photo S-17 Photo S-18

Photo S-19 Photo S-20

Township of Chatsworth Appendix C – Photographs Page C-25

Keady Community Centre BCA
 Photo S-21 Photo S-22

Photo S-23 Photo S-24

Township of Chatsworth Appendix C – Photographs Page C-26

Keady Community Centre BCA
 Photo S-25 Photo S-26

Photo S-27 Photo S-28

Township of Chatsworth Appendix C – Photographs Page C-27
Keady Community Centre BCA
 Photo S-29 Photo S-30

Photo S-31 Photo S-32

Township of Chatsworth Appendix C – Photographs Page C-28

Keady Community Centre BCA
 Photo S-33 Photo S-34

Photo S-35 Photo S-36

Township of Chatsworth Appendix C – Photographs Page C-29

Keady Community Centre BCA
 Photo S-37 Photo S-38

Photo S-39 Photo S-40

Township of Chatsworth Appendix C – Photographs Page C-30

Keady Community Centre BCA
 Photo S-41 Photo S-42

Photo S-43 Photo S-44

Township of Chatsworth Appendix C – Photographs Page C-31

Keady Community Centre BCA
 Photo S-45 Photo S-46

Photo S-47 Photo S-48

Township of Chatsworth Appendix C – Photographs Page C-32

Keady Community Centre BCA
 Photo S-49 Photo S-50

Township of Chatsworth Appendix C – Photographs Page C-33

Keady Community Centre BCA
Photo M-01 – Intake Louvres from Attic Photo M-02 – FU1 and Abandoned Eq’t

Photo M-03 – HWT1 in room with no Heater Photo M-04 – Combined HWT Venting

Town of Chatsworth APPENDIX C – PHOTOGRAPHS Page C-34

Keady Community Centre BCA
Photo E-01 – Dead Vines, Aging Pole & XFMRs Photo E-02 – Peeling Ins. & Improper Splices

Photo E-03 – Better if WP-While-In-Use Cover Photo E-04 – Unsealed Penetrations

Town of Chatsworth APPENDIX C – PHOTOGRAPHS Page C-35

Keady Community Centre BCA
Photo E-05 – Wire Nuts  Improper Connection Photo E-06 – Broken Conduit Connection

Photo E-07 – Exposed and Rusting Conduit Photo E-08 – Indoor J-Box Located Outdoors

Town of Chatsworth APPENDIX C – PHOTOGRAPHS Page C-36

Keady Community Centre BCA
Photo E-09 – Broken LB-Conduit Connection Photo E-10 – Unsealed Penetration

Photo E-11 – Control Wire not WP Photo E-12 – Msg Cover / Exposed Conductor

Town of Chatsworth APPENDIX C – PHOTOGRAPHS Page C-37

Keady Community Centre BCA
Photo E-13 – Unsupported Boxes Photo E-14 – Old Disc. Switch, Typical

Photo E-15 – Working Space Violation Photo E-16 – Loose Box and AC90 Cable

Town of Chatsworth APPENDIX C – PHOTOGRAPHS Page C-38

Keady Community Centre BCA
Photo E-17 – Uncovered Hole in Splitter Box Photo E-18 – Old Ice Plant Controls

Photo E-19 – Unit Heater Improper Connection Photo E-20 – Jerry-Rigged UH Fan

Town of Chatsworth APPENDIX C – PHOTOGRAPHS Page C-39

Keady Community Centre BCA
Photo E-21 – Splitter As Shelf Photo E-22 – Transformer As Shelf

Photo E-23 – More Improper Storage vis-a-vie Photo E-24 – Flex Cord as Permanent Wiring
electrical equipment

Town of Chatsworth APPENDIX C – PHOTOGRAPHS Page C-40

Keady Community Centre BCA
Photo E-25 – Loose Conductors NW HVAC Mezz. Photo E-26 – Open Device Box Knock-Outs

Photo E-27 – Loose HVAC Control Wires in Attic Photo E-28 – Broken & Yellowed Wall-Pack Light

Town of Chatsworth APPENDIX C – PHOTOGRAPHS Page C-41

Keady Community Centre BCA
Photo E-29 – Dirty Canopy Light Photo E-30 – Broken Mount, Old Wall-Pack

Photo E-31 – Vulnerable Light Bulb Utility Rm. Photo E-32 – Vulnerable Light Bulb Lobby Stor.

Town of Chatsworth APPENDIX C – PHOTOGRAPHS Page C-42

Keady Community Centre BCA
Photo E-33 – Vulnerable Light Bulb Attic Stor.

Town of Chatsworth APPENDIX C – PHOTOGRAPHS Page C-43

Keady Community Centre BCA
Photo C-01 – Pumping Chamber Access Photo C-02 – Pumping Chamber

Photo C-03 – Leaching Bed Looking North Photo C-04 – Leaching Bed Looking South

Town of Chatsworth – Keady Community Centre BCA APPENDIX C – PHOTOGRAPHS Page C-44
Township of Chatsworth
Keady Community Centre
Building Condition Assessment

APPENDIX

D
Mechanical Equipment Summary

September 2018
 HVAC Equipment Summary: Keady Arena
Est
ID Type Description Location Service Area Mfr Model Capacity Efficiency Age Recommendations

Air Handler with heat Second Floor Lobby, Coat Room, 1800 CFM, 4-TON COOLING, Re-design and replace
FU1 Air Handler pump coil Attic second floor York N4AHD16A06C 60,000 BTU/HR HEATING Standard 15y within 5 years
North-East 1125 CFM, 2.5-TON
Air Handler with heat Mechanical Changerooms, EAST COOLING, 30,000 BTU/HR Re-design and replace
FU2 Air Handler pump coil Room washrooms York N4AHD10A06C HEATING Standard 15y within 5 years
North-East
Air Handler with heat Mechanical 2250 CFM, 5-TON COOLING, Re-design and replace
FU2 Air Handler pump coil Room Changerooms York N1AHD20A06A 60,000 BTU/HR HEATING Standard 15y within 5 years
4000 CFM, 10-TON
Assembly area, COOLING, 240,000 BTU/HR
RTU1 Rooftop Unit Package Air Handler Outside in Front Kitchen York ZF120N24D5A1AAA1A2 HEATING HIGH <2y None
Lobby, Coat Room, Re-design and replace
HP1 Heat Pump Heat Pump Split Unit Arena second floor York E1FH048S06A 4-Tons Standard 10y within 5 years
Changerooms, EAST Re-design and replace
HP2 Heat Pump Heat Pump Split Unit Arena washrooms York E1FH030S06A 4-Tons Standard 10y within 5 years
Re-design and replace
HP3 Heat Pump Heat Pump Split Unit Arena Changerooms York E1FH060S06A 4-Tons Standard 10y within 5 years

Plumbing Equipment Summary: Keady Arena

Est
ID Type Description Location Service Area Mfr Model Capacity Efficiency Age Recommendations

South Not operational. Replace

Domestic Hot Atmospheric vent hot Mechanical immediately with high
HWT1 Water Tank water tank. Oil fireed Room Zamboni Area Brock 50E-2 50USGAL 60% >20y efficiency Propane
North-East Replace immediately with
Domestic Hot Atmospheric vent hot Mechanical Changerooms, John single high efficiency
HWT2/3 Water Tank water tank. Oil fireed Room Washrooms Wood N/A 100USGAL 60% >20y propane model
Remove and feed from
Domestic Hot Atmospheric vent hot Interior service Prep Area and interior John south-east mechanical
HWT4 Water Tank water tank, Electric room Washroom Wood 1752 30USGAL 60% 15y room within 5 years
North-West Replace at end of service
Domestic Hot Mechanical like with high efficiency
HWT5 Water Tank Electric Hot Water Tank Room Kitchen Rheem PRO612T 60USGAL 60% 10y model
Submersible Replace after 15 years of
P1 pump Well pump drilled well Whole Building N/A N/A 1/2HP N/A unk service life
South
Mechanical Replace after 15 years of
P2 Jet pump Dug Well pump Room Zamboni Area N/A N/A 3/4HP N/A unk service life
South
Mechanical Challenge
TK1 Well Tank Well Tank Room Zamboni Area r 12Z 30 USGAL N/A 20y Replace within 2 years
North-West
Mechanical Kitchen, Washrooms,
TK2 Well Tank Well Tank Room Changerooms Well Rite WR360A 119 USGAL N/A 20y Replace within 2 years

Township of Chatsworth - Keady Community Centre BCA Appendix D - Mechanical Equipment Summary Page D-01