The document provides a rubric for assessing lab reports for a Mechanism and Mechanical Vibration course. It outlines four levels of achievement - Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor - across five sections of the report: Objective, Introduction, Procedure, Results/Discussion, and Conclusion. For each section, it describes the criteria that would earn the report a rating at each of the four levels in terms of completeness, accuracy, analysis, and organization.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views
Assessment Rubrics For Lab Report
The document provides a rubric for assessing lab reports for a Mechanism and Mechanical Vibration course. It outlines four levels of achievement - Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor - across five sections of the report: Objective, Introduction, Procedure, Results/Discussion, and Conclusion. For each section, it describes the criteria that would earn the report a rating at each of the four levels in terms of completeness, accuracy, analysis, and organization.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
Assessment Rubrics for ME-433 Mechanism and mechanical vibration
Lab Repors Section of report(weightage) Excellent (9-10) Good (7-8) Fair (6-4) Poor (3-1)
Objective is mostly Part of objective is
Objective (5%) Objective is written in clear accurate and complete but missing or incomplete, Objective written is wrong. form may have minor errors or or there are significant omissions. errors in statement. The introduction entails Theory written is mostly theory taught in class,and what’s taught in class and Theory and Calculations Introduction theory written makes Calculations are mostly have significant errors, Theory and Calculations are sense. Accurate correct with minor errors unclear steps, or missing, calculations with clear or omissions. Some steps incorrect units used. incomplete, or inaccurate. steps shown may be unclear. Procedure written, is mostly Procedure is difficult to Procedure is Student writes clearly what accurate and easy to understand or inaccurately missing or Procedure(20%) happended in lab understand but may have represents the Required incomplete. minor errors in presentation information. representation. Clear and concise Results are mostly clear explanation of results, with and well-analyzed but may Results are difficult to Results and discussion are Results/Discussion (50%) thorough analysis and have minor errors or understand or poorly missing or incomplete. discussion of their omissions. analyzed. Discussion is significance. Discussion may be lacking or absent. incomplete or unclear. All-important conclusions All-important conclusions Conclusions regarding major Conclusions missing or have been clearly made; have been drawn, could points are drawn, but many missing the important points student shows good be better stated are misstated, indicating a Conclusion (10%) understanding lack of understanding Appearance and All sections in order, well All sections in order, Sections in order, Sections out of order, formatting formatted, very readable. formatting generally good contains the minimum too much handwritten (15%) but could still be improved. allowable amount of copy, sloppy formatting. handwritten copy, formatting is rough but readable. LE Muhammad Zeeshan Ahsan