Exploration Methods - Borehole Geophysics
Exploration Methods - Borehole Geophysics
Exploration Techniques-
Subsurface Geology / Borehole Geophysics
1
EXPLORATION WORKFLOW - RECAP
• Surface geology
• Desk study (reports, maps)
• Direct Indications such as oil and gas seeps, pock marks
• Geological Mapping
• Remote sensing
• Seeps
• Reservoir architecture
• Geophysical surveys
• Gravity
• Magnetics
• Seismics
• Subsurface geology
• Drill well
• Cuttings
• LWD
• Wireline
• Coring
• Conventional
• Sidewall
• Shot
• Fluid sample
2
DRILLING
3
BOREHOLE ENVIRONMENT
4
DRILLING
5
MUD LOGGING OBJECTIVES
6
MUD LOGS - EXAMPLE
8
CORE - TYPES
9
CORE - TYPES
Sidewall Coring
• A cheaper and quicker method of retrieving core samples
• Samples are smaller than conventional cores, with a diameter of 1 inch and length of 1.75 inches.
• Sidewall cores are obtained extensively from soft sand areas, however it is also possible to analyse
cores taken from harder formations.
• There are two different types of sidewall coring used to retrieve these samples:
1. Percussion
2. Rotary
10
CORE - TYPES
Sidewall Coring
1. Percussion sidewall coring –
• A sidewall coring tool containing explosives is
lowered into the well.
• The explosives are used to propel a number of
small, hollow, cylindrical tubes into the sides of
the well to retrieve samples of the rock.
• As the coring tool is raised to the surface, the
tubes, which are connected to the tool by wires,
are pulled up as well.
• The samples recovered by this method are often
shattered due to impact fracturing caused by the
explosives, resulting in erroneous measurements
of rock properties
• They are usually excellent for indication of
lithology and interpretation of potential
productivity.
11
CORE - TYPES
Sidewall Coring
2. Rotary Sidewall Coring
• Small core samples are retrieved from the
side of the well using a rotary sidewall
coring drill.
• The rotary drill does not cause as much
damage to core samples as percussion
coring equipment, therefore reliable,
accurate measurements of various rock
properties can be made
12
TYPES OF CORE ANALYSIS
13
USES OF CORES
14
LIMITATIONS OF CORES
15
WELL LOGGING - INTRODUCTION
16
WELL LOGGING - TYPES
• Wireline
• Logging While Drilling (LWD)
17
WIRELINE LOGGING
18
WIRELINE LOGGING - COMPONENTS OF A WIRELINE UNIT
19
LOGGING WHILE DRILLING
20
LOGGING WHILE DRILLING
21
BOREHOLE LOGGING -
PRINCIPLES OF WELL LOGGING
23
BOREHOLE LOGGING - PRINCIPLES OF WELL LOGGING
• The instrument is housed in a cylindrical metal tube (Sonde) connected to an unbreakable multicore cable fixed in a
rotating drum fitted with winches and a recorder.
• The probe is lowered to the bottom of the hole and logging is carried out while hoisting the instrument ups though
the section.
• Logging data are automatically recorded on a paper strip and simultaneously on magnetic tape in analogue or
digital form for subsequent computer processing.
• Performance of logging tools depends on the logging environment. The environment includes such factors as rock
type and structure, fluids in the well and adjacent formation, temperature and pressure
• Geological properties obtained from well logging are formation thickness, lithology, porosity, permeability, pore
pressure, fluid contacts, proportion of water and hydrocarbon saturation and temperature.
• Most logs are run in open hole with cased hole logging being restricted to instances such as:
• Cement-bond logs are used after setting casing to determine the quality of the bond between casing and cement. If the
bond is not sufficient, then remedial operations are needed before proceeding with any completion operations.
• Gamma radiation log for correlating depths of target formations for completion operations in cased holes.
• Temperature logs and flow-rate logs may be used to identify sources of fluids in completed wells.
24
BOREHOLE LOGGING – DEPTH OF INVESTIGATION
26
WELL LOGS FORMAT
27
BOREHOLE MEASUREMENT LOGS - CALIPER
28
BOREHOLE MEASUREMENT LOGS - CALIPER
• Lithology log
• A gamma-ray tool detects natural gamma-ray emissions from radioactive isotopes.
• Gamma-ray logs imply the presence of shale when there is a high gamma-ray response.
• Clean (shale-free) sands or carbonates tend to have a low gamma-ray response.
• Depth of investigation is about 1.5 ft
• Natural radioactivity includes alpha, beta, and gamma rays.
• Alpha rays are helium nuclei, beta rays are electrons, and gamma rays are photons.
• Alpha and beta rays are low energy. Gamma rays emitted by nuclei have energies in the range from
103eV (electron volts) to 107eV and can penetrate several feet of rock.
31
GAMMA RAY LOGS
• Naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) are minerals that contain radioactive isotopes of the
elements uranium, thorium, potassium, radium, and radon.
• The decay of naturally occurring radioactive isotopes produces gamma rays.
• Gamma ray log is reported in pseudo-units called API units
• Can be used in both open and cased holes as it can pass through steel casing
• High gamma ray reading associated with clays or shale is due to presence of K and its absorption of Ur
and Th
32
GAMMA RAY LOGS
34
GAMMA RAY LOGS - USES
35
SPONTANEOUS POTENTIAL LOGS
• Lithology log
• The SP log is an electric log that records the direct current (DC) voltage difference, or electrical
potential, between two electrodes. One electrode is grounded at the surface, and the other
electrode on the logging tool moves along the face of formations in the wellbore.
• The range of the voltage on an SP logging track is typically up to 200mV.
• The SP voltage for shales in a particular well is fairly constant and forms a “shale baseline” for
interpretation of the SP log for that well. The SP for shale-free formations is negative by 50–100
mV relative to the shale baseline and forms a “sand baseline.”
• These two boundaries provide a rule for interpolating the amount of clay or shale in a formation
based on its SP.
36
SPONTANEOUS POTENTIAL LOGS
39
SPONTANEOUS POTENTIAL – SHALE CONTENT
• Answer
Vshale = (- 80mV – -30mV) / (-80mV – 40mV)
= -50mV / -120mV
= 0.42 or 42%
40
PHOTOELECTRIC LOG
• Lithology log
• The PE refers to the absorption of a low energy gamma ray by inner
orbital atomic electrons. The extent of this absorption (PEF) varies Photoelectric Factors
with atomic number of the atom.
• The PE logging tool is part of the density logging tool. The PE tool
measures the absorption or falloff of low energy gamma-ray energy.
• The falloff in gamma-ray energy is quantified as a PE factor (PEF).
• Hydrocarbons and water contribute very little to the PEF because their
atomic numbers are low compared to rocks in the formation.
• The atomic numbers of different rock types can be correlated to PEF so
that PEF serves as a good indicator of lithology or rock type as listed in
the adjacent table.
• PEF is not very sensitive to porosity.
• The PE logging track is often scaled from 0 to 10 in units of barns per
electron (b/e). A barn is a measure of cross-sectional area and 1 barn
equals 10–28m2.
41
• Depth of investigation for the PE logging tool is typically 1 to 2 ft.
DENSITY
• Combining ρb from the density log with rock matrix density, ρma and fluid density, ρf yields
porosity, ϕ:
43
DENSITY
• Results of the density tool are presented in three tracks on a log: bulk density, density correction, and
porosity.
• The density correction track shows corrections to the bulk density due to irregularities in wellbore
diameter. It is an indication of the quality of the bulk density response. For density corrections greater
than 0.2 g/cm3, the bulk density values are suspect.
• The depth of investigation for the density tool is typically 1–2 ft.
44
DENSITY LOGS -USES
• Corrections are to be applied if the hole diameter is larger than 10 inches using chart
• Corrections are to be applied for shale volume
45
DENSITY LOGS -USES
46
NEUTRON
• Porosity log
• Conducted in both open and cased hole
• Neutron logging is undertaken in combination with the
density porosity reading in order to identify and correct
effects of shale and gas
• Neutron logging devices include one or more detectors
and a neutron source that continuously emits energetic
(fast) neutrons.
• Principles of operation:
• A neutron source emits a continuous flux of high-energy
• Collisions with formation nuclei reduce the neutron energy -
thereby slowing it down.
• At thermal energy levels (approximately 0.025 eV), neutrons
are captured
• Neutron capture results in an emission of gamma rays
• Depending on the type of tool, the detector measures the
slowed down neutrons and/or emitted gamma rays
47
NEUTRON
• The neutron log curve will provide a good measure of formation porosity if liquid-filled pore
spaces contain hydrogen, as is the case when pores are filled with oil or water.
• A small response illustrates a low hydrogen concentration which can be interpreted as gas
presence, while oil and water have higher and almost the same concentration of hydrogen
than gas.
• Neutron - GR logs require departure curves (provided in chart books) to make corrections. The
following formula can be used for correction:
ΦNcor=ΦN - (Vsh × ΦNsh)
Where:
ΦNcor: Corrected neutron porosity
ΦN: Apparent neutron porosity read from the neutron log
Vsh: Shale volume (correction required if > 5%)
ΦNsh: Apparent neutron porosity at the shale point
48
NEUTRON - USES
49
SONIC
• Porosity logs
• The elapsed time to propagate a sound wave from a source on a logging tool through the formation and back to a
receiver on the tool depends on formation porosity.
• The tool that sends and receives sound waves is called an acoustic log or sonic log.
• The speed of sound in a medium depends on the density of the medium. In the case of rock, density depends on
the density of rock matrix and the density of the fluids occupying the pore space in the rock.
• Fluid density is usually much smaller than matrix density. Consequently, the bulk density of a formation with
relatively large pore volume is less than the bulk density of a formation with relatively small pore volume if the
fluids in the pore volume are the same in both formations.
• An estimate of the speed of sound v in a formation is given by Wyllie’s equation. If we write the speed of sound in
fluids occupying the pore volume of a rock as vf, rock porosity as ϕ and the speed of sound in the rock matrix as
vma, Wyllie’s equation is
• Porosity logs
• The elapsed time to propagate a sound wave
from a source on a logging tool through the
formation and back to a receiver on the tool
depends on formation porosity.
• The tool that sends and receives sound waves
is called an acoustic log or sonic log.
• Sonic log tools consist of one transmitter and
two or three receivers and all of these are
located in single unit called a “sonde”
51
SONIC - USES
• Sonic logs are mainly used in combination with other logs for the following purposes:
1. Determination of porosity
2. To improve interpretation of seismic records
3. Identifying lithology
4. Estimating secondary pore space
5. Estimating permeability
52
RESISTIVITY LOGS
• The resistivity of a substance is a measure of its opposition to the passage of electrical current
expressed in the units of Ω cm2/m or Ω.m
Resistivity = Resistance of material x A / L
• Rock grains in the formation are usually nonconductive, so formation resistivity depends
primarily on the electrical properties of the fluid contained in the pore space.
• Hydrocarbon fluids are usually highly resistive because they do not contain ions in solution.
• Formation water contains ions in solution that can support an electrical current and have
relatively small resistivity.
• Resistivity logs can be used to distinguish between brine and hydrocarbon fluids in the pore
spaces of the formation.
53
RESISTIVITY LOGS - TOOLS
Fluid Resistivity
1. Concentration (ppm) and type of dissolved salts
• Resistivity decreases as salinity increases up to a maximum
• Dissolved salt impedes the passage of current carrying anions.
2. Temperature
• Resistivity of a solution is inversely proportional to the temperature
55
FACTORS INFLUENCING RESISTIVITY
56
RESISTIVITY - USES
• Determining true formation resistivity (Rt) for calculating uninvaded zone saturation (Sw)
• Identification thin beds
• Determining flushed zone resistivity (Rxo) for calculating flushed zone saturation ( Sxo)
• Indicate moveable hydrocarbon (in combo)
• Estimate diameter invasion (in combo)
• Correct deeper reading of resistivity because effect of invasion
57
LOG RESPONSES
58
INTERPRETATION PROCESS – WHY INTERPRET LOGS
• Where:
• 7758 = conversion factor from acre-ft to bbl
• A = area of reservoir (acres) from map data
• h = height or thickness of pay zone (ft) from log and/or core data
• ø = porosity (decimal) from log and/or core data
• Sw = connate water saturation (decimal) from log and/or core data
• Boi = formation volume factor for oil at initial conditions (reservoir bbl/STB) from lab data; a quick estimate is
• where N is the number of hundreds of ft3 of gas produced per bbl of oil
[for example, in a well with a GOR of 1000, Boi = 1.05 + (10 × 0.05)] 59
INTERPRETATION PROCESS
60
WELL LOG INTERPRETATION PROCESS
61
WELL LOG INTERPRETATION PROCESS
2. Interpret Lithology
• If the formation is made up of one mineral then a particular log measurement may be used to
identify that mineral and therefore infer the rock type (lithology).
• However, if the formation is made up of a mixture of known minerals then it is necessary to use a
combination of logs to obtain a good indication of the mineralogical content and therefore
lithology of the formation.
• The composition of the rock can be inferred by cross-plotting combinations of the Density,
Neutron and Acoustic log data
62
WELL LOG INTERPRETATION PROCESS
• Porosity values can be derived from a single log in clean, water bearing formations, where properties
including lithology are known and this value can be corrected for various environmental effects.
• Other factors such as the presence of hydrocarbons and shale influence the value of porosity obtained
by well logs.
65
WELL LOG INTERPRETATION PROCESS
66
WELL LOG INTERPRETATION PROCESS
6. Determination Of Saturation
• Estimation of hydrocarbon saturation cannot be measured directly but
inferred from determination of WATER SATURATION (Sw) from RESISTIVITY
and POROSITY logs
• The electrical resistivity of a formation is a very good indicator of the fluid
in the pore space of that formation.
• Neither oil nor gas conducts electrical current but water does.
• It is assumed that all pore space not filled with water is occupied by
hydrocarbons
• It is very rare however for a formation to contain no water at all and there
is generally some level of water saturation of the pore space, Sw in all
formations
• Sw – Fraction of pore space occupied by water.
• Sh – Fraction of pore space occupied by hydrocarbon. 68
WELL LOG INTERPRETATION PROCESS
6. Determination Of Saturation
• In clean formations, the water saturation (Sw) can be determined using Archie’s water saturation
equation:
Where:
• Rw: Resistivity of Water in the formation
• Rt: True formation resistivity
• F: Formation resistivity factor
• In this equation, n is a constant and is usually assumed to be 2
• The formation resistivity factor (F) can be found using the following equation:
• Where:
• a: Constant
• m: Cementation factor 69
WELL LOG INTERPRETATION PROCESS
6. Determination Of Saturation
• Combining the two equations, gives:
70
WELL LOG INTERPRETATION
PROCESS
• Determination of Sw
• Figure shows an example of this plot
where the upper line is for 100%
water saturation.
• The value of Rw corresponds to the
gradient of the line. In this case,
Rw=0.65 ohm-m.
• The other line on the plot is for a
formation water saturation of 50%
(Sw=0.5).
• For any values of Sw other than 1,
the relationship between Rt and Ro is
given by
71
SUMMARY OF INTERPRETATION PROCEDURES
72
NET TO GROSS
• NET:
Thickness of clean, permeable, hydrocarbon-
containing rock in the reservoir zone.
• Gross:
The thickness of rock in the reservoir zone
irrespective of whether it is clean, its
permeability or its fluid saturation.
• NTG:
The net to gross ratio (thickness of net rock
divided by the thickness of gross rock) is often
used to represent the quality of a reservoir
zone.
73
EXERCISE
74
• Shade sand vs shale
75
76
A) Figure showing gamma-ray and SP (self-potential or
spontaneous potential) logs through an interbedded
interval of sandstone (SS), shale (SH), limestone (LS),
and dolomite (DOL). The effects of lithology are seen on
the two logs in the picture. Gamma-ray counts (in API
units of measure) are high for shales and low for
sandstones and dolomite. The same is true for the SP log
curve. Thus, both logs are lithology indicators. The
gamma-ray log has a better resolving power than the SP
log for detecting beds of a certain thickness, so the
gamma-ray log provides a better characterization of
lithology and bed thickness than does the SP log.
B) The density log measures the density of the rock and its
contained fluids. Thus, the density log is sometimes
referred to as a porosity log. Different fluids, particularly
gas, can have a pronounced effect on the density
measurement, as is shown on the diagram. Limestones
and dolomites tend to have a higher density than do
sandstones of the same porosity. 77
78
79
• Full explanation here
• https://www.studocu.com/row/document/jamaa%D8%A9-almlk-fhd-llbtrol-o-almaaadn/well-
logging/lecture-notes/3-self-potential-log-copy/2764948/view
80
INTERPRET FORMATION AND FLUID
81
WELL LOG CORRELATION
• A correlation expresses how the rock units (or other geological phenomena such as fossil zones)
observed at one location (e.g. a well) are related or connected to those found in other locations
(e.g. other wells, or outcrops)
• Geologists try to use a number of guidelines or considerations to constrain their interpretation,
but the result is still an opinion, and could be altered by the input of further data
• There are many different types of correlation – depending on the data used to correlate
and the reason for correlating.
• For example, a correlation designed to show the age relationship of a succession of rocks will look quite
different from a correlation designed to illustrate the lithological connections
• Correlation is the basis of our understanding of the distribution and the arrangement or
architecture of our reservoir, and therefore what kind of fluid flow behaviour we expect.
• We use correlation and maps to estimate reservoir volume, porosity permeability distributions
and therefore fluid volume and flow units.
82
WELL LOG CORRELATION – DATA TO
BE CORRELATED
D. R. Matuszak, 1972 83
WELL LOG CORRELATION –
LOG TYPES AND INFLUENCES
D. R. Matuszak, 1972 84
WELL LOG CORRELATION - LIMITATIONS
85
WELL LOG CORRELATION GUIDELINES
1. Align the depth scale of the logs and look for correlation
2. If no correlation is evident, begin to slide one of the logs until a good correlation point is found,
and mark it
3. Continue this process over the entire length of each log until all recognized correlations have
been identified
4. Always begin correlation at the top of the log, not the middle
5. For initial quick-look correlation, review major sand or carbonate bodies using the SP curve or
gamma ray curve.
6. For detailed correlation work, first correlate shale sections with large scale changes; worry
about the formation tops and markers first, before correlating minor changes and beds .
7. Initially, use the amplified shallow resistivity curve (focused or short normal), which usually
provides the most reliable shale correlations.
8. Use colored pencils to identify specific correlation points.
9. Check for missing and repeated sections.
86
WELL LOG CORRELATION
Example of two different kinds of correlation between three wells. On the left, the three wells are correlated by their different lithologies (note
that the top and bottom of the drawn well section are not correlated, since these are artificial boundaries created by drilling and sampling, and
have nothing to do with geological boundaries). The different lithologies are conglomerate (ovoid symbols), sandstone (dots) and siltstone
(dashes).
On the right, the biostratigraphic markers (numbers 1-5) have been correlated, showing that the bottommost sandstone in Well 1 is older87than
the bottommost sandstone in Well 2 – raising the question of whether they are in fact correlatable between these wells
WELL LOG CORRELATION
An example of how the lithological correlation can change with additional information
89
• Correlate the different
lithological units represented
here (dots for sandstone, dashes
for siltstone, brick pattern for
limestone and ovoids for
conglomerate). Assume that
a biostratigraphic datum has
already been defined and used to
align the logs to their
original depositional (flat lying
strata) arrangement.
90
Here the appearance and disappearance
datums are correlated. The yellow star critter
only appears in sands, and it's disappearance is
entirely related to the top of the sand units.
Therefore it is likely to be facies restricted and
therefore not a good candidate for
biostratigraphy. The pink and green critters in
the lower part of the correlation have last
appearance datums that coincide, and also the
green critter is missing from the rightmost
column. This implies that there is erosion below
the limestone unit, an unconformity. In view of
this and the age data from the fossils, the
correlation in the bottom half would look quite
different – as it is likely that the two thinner
sands correlate together, before being eroded
by the unconformity, and the thicker sand does 91
not connect to these units.
• Shade sand/shale units
92
EXERCISE
93
EXERCISE
94
EXERCISE
95
EXERCISE
96