0% found this document useful (0 votes)
341 views

Argumentative Essay

The document discusses the issue of using animal testing for cosmetics and drugs. It argues that while animal testing for medical purposes can be allowed to potentially save human lives, animal testing for cosmetics is unethical and should be prohibited. The cosmetics industry and biomedical research have different objectives, and animals suffer severe pain during cosmetics testing. Alternative testing methods should be developed for cosmetics. Animal testing in healthcare is more complex as it can benefit humanity, but it also harms biodiversity and all living beings. Laws and regulations need to consider both perspectives on this issue.

Uploaded by

Jude Parreño
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
341 views

Argumentative Essay

The document discusses the issue of using animal testing for cosmetics and drugs. It argues that while animal testing for medical purposes can be allowed to potentially save human lives, animal testing for cosmetics is unethical and should be prohibited. The cosmetics industry and biomedical research have different objectives, and animals suffer severe pain during cosmetics testing. Alternative testing methods should be developed for cosmetics. Animal testing in healthcare is more complex as it can benefit humanity, but it also harms biodiversity and all living beings. Laws and regulations need to consider both perspectives on this issue.

Uploaded by

Jude Parreño
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Should We Use Animal Testing for Cosmetics and Drug?

Animals are widely known that have been used as an object for conducting
various experiments. Until now, animals involve in different type of researches
like medicines and cosmetics. They are used for economic purposes, however, for
these processes are prohibited. There are ethical issues who are examining the
animals in different industry. I believe that using animals for cosmetics are not
ethical and it needs to be banned, while for medical purposes can be allowed.
This can be saved human lives, but it has to be regulated by the law.

The animal testing sometimes brings a beneficial to us. The government


didn't build a proposition concerning on the use of animals in researches. That is
why PEGs on their investigation, argued that "more could be done to ensure
transparency and to extricate the vested financial interests from the human health
benefits". It is become clear that animals are being used for experiments for human
health benefits. This truth forces us to look only for the moral side of the issue, so
this will be more complicated. The law that exists today is only associated with the
use of animals in creating medicines and vaccines, even in industry of cosmetics. It
is obvious that the development of ethical concept that comes together in the use of
animals for different types of research has importance.

The situation in the industry of cosmetic has become more complicated and
controversial. I believe that cosmetic industry and biomedical research is
completely dissimilar because they have different objectives. Cosmetics helps
people to decorate themselves which are given by nature, their health will not
deteriorate without it but for the development of various cosmetic substances.
People are nurtured animals, especially the rabbits, are suffering on the extreme
impact of the substances putting them in, in most cases, animals feel severe pain.

And also in biomedical research it helps people to conduct more experiments


or to continue to the understanding and amelioration of diseases such as cancer,
diabetes, and uncontrollable infectious diseases. It will also be essential in efforts
to understand and control newly emergent human diseases. Thinking should the
ecosystem be put in the middle of any decision. This will be the way that people
can maintain and support biodiversity on the Earth because it ensures thousands
processes that allow people to survive. It is difficult to justify the animal testing in
the cosmetic industry. So, alternative methods of animal testing for cosmetics
should be developed because this will help for both animals and people.

Animal analysis is conducted in various purposes. Some of them may be


righteous but others are not. The case of animal testing is easier to judge because
of its initial purpose. It is not ethical and should not be carried out. Instead, other
methods of cognitive testing should be developed. The animal welcome to the
health care industry is more controversial, it can provide the goal of bringing
benefits to people's health benefits. The only way here is that conducting fair
research to consider both sides of the issue and follow it.
Main Topic of Essay
What is the impact of technology on people’s ability to

Mula ngayon ay marami nang gumagamit ng mga makabagong teknolohiya na


naging sandalan na nila mula noon hanggang ngayon, mas dumarami ang
gumagamit dahil narin sa Pandemyang lumaganap dito sa mundo upang may
magkaroon ng pagkaabalahan sa bahay o gamitin upang maka-pagtrabaho kahit
na nasa bahay lamang, ngunit dahil narin dito ay marami nabababad sa social
media na nagiging

Should We Use Animal Testing for Cosmetics and Drug?

It is widely known that animals have long been used as the objects on which
people carry out various experiments for their purpose. Currently, people involve
animals in various types of researches: in medicine (drugs and injections), in
biomedical research, and in the design of cosmetics. Animals are used for
economic purposes; however, the peculiarities of these processes are not
highlighted for people in open access. There are specific ethical issues concerning
animal testing in various types of industries. I believe that the use of animals in the
cosmetic industry is unethical and should be prohibited, while animal testing for
medical purposes can be allowed. As it often saves human lives, but such testing
should be thoroughly regulated by the law.

Despite the fact that animal testing sometimes brings benefits for humanity, the
government has not developed unambiguous principles concerning the use of
animals in cosmetic researches. That is why Peggs, in her investigation, argued that
"more could be done to ensure transparency and to extricate the vested financial
interests from the human health benefits" (624). It is due to the fact that each year
millions of animals are under the threat of extinction from biomedical experiments,
which are conducted for human health benefits. It becomes evident that many
animal testing experiments are carried out for human health benefits. This fact
forces us to look at the moral side of the issue. Thus, the articulation of an ethical
code here is somewhat complicated. The law which exists today relates only to the
use of animals in the creation of drugs and vaccines. But there are no identified
principles concerning the use of animals in biomedical researches or in the
cosmetic industry. Which are widely developed today ("Background of the Issue").
It can be seen that the development and adoption of ethical principles concerning
the use of animals as objects in various types of research is of crucial importance.

The situation with the cosmetics industry is much more complex and controversial.
I believe that the cosmetic industry and biomedical investigations are entirely
different concepts because their initial purpose is different. With the help of
cosmetics people try to decorate themselves and improve those traits which are
given by nature. Their health will not deteriorate without it. But for the
development of various cosmetic substances, people make animals, primarily
rabbits, suffer because of the severe impact of these substances on their bodies. In
the majority of cases, animals feel severe pain. Here, it is necessary to think
philosophically and place the ecosystem in the center when making any decision.
The principle of ecocentrism inspires to treat nature and the ecosystem as equal to
humans by their importance (Animal Ethics par. 2-3). People should maintain and
support biodiversity which exists on the Earth because it ensures thousands of
processes which allow people to live on the planet. It is difficult to justify animal
testing in the cosmetic sphere. Alternative methods of testing cosmetics should be
developed. as they will be crucial for both animals and people.

As it can be seen, animal testing is carried out for various purposes. Some of them
can be justified. but others cannot be. The case of animal testing is easier to be
judged because of its initial purpose. It is unethical and should not be conducted.
Instead, other methods of cosmetic testing should be developed. Animal testing in
the healthcare industry is more controversial. It can be provided with the aim to
bring benefits to human health and save millions of people. But at the same time,
such testing destroys the biodiversity of the planet and is harmful to all living
beings The only way here can be the creation of proper codification which will
take into account both sides of the issue and follow it.
Malawakang kilala na ang mga hayop ay matagal nang ginamit bilang mga bagay
kung saan nagsasagawa ang mga tao ng iba't ibang mga eksperimento para sa
kanilang hangarin. Sa kasalukuyan, ang mga tao ay nagsasangkot ng mga hayop sa
iba't ibang mga uri ng rescarches: sa gamot (gamot at iniksiyon), sa biomedical na
pananaliksik, at sa disenyo ng mga pampaganda. Ginagamit ang mga hayop para sa
mga layuning pang-ekonomiya; gayunpaman, ang mga kakaibang katangian ng
mga proseso na ito ay hindi nai-highlight para sa mga taong may bukas na pag-
access. Mayroong mga tiyak na isyu sa etika na nagkukumpuni sa pagsusuri ng
hayop sa iba't ibang uri ng industriya. Naniniwala ako na ang paggamit ng mga
hayop sa industriya ng kosmetiko ay hindi etikal at dapat na ipinagbabawal,
habang pinapayagan ang pagsusuri ng hayop para sa mga medikal na layunin. dahil
madalas itong nakakatipid ng buhay ng tao, ngunit ang nasabing pagsusuri ay dapat
na lubusang kinokontrol ng batas.

Sa kabila ng katotohanang ang pagsubok sa hayop minsan ay nagdudulot ng mga


benepisyo para sa sangkatauhan, ang gobyerno ay hindi nakabuo ng hindi
siguradong mga prinsipyo na nagkukumpuni sa paggamit ng mga hayop sa mga
cosmetic na pagsasaliksik. Iyon ang dahilan kung bakit Peggs, sa kanyang
pagsisiyasat, Nagtalo na "higit pa ang maaaring magawa upang matiyak ang
transparency at upang mapalabas ang mga vested interes sa pananalapi mula sa
mga benepisyo sa kalusugan ng tao" (624). Ito ay dahil sa ang katunayan na bawat
taon milyon-milyong mga hayop ay nasa ilalim ng banta ng pagkalipol mula sa
mga eksperimento sa biomedical, na isinasagawa para sa mga benepisyo sa
kalusugan ng tao. Ito ay naging maliwanag na maraming mga eksperimento sa
pagsubok ng hayop ang isinasagawa para sa mga benepisyo sa kalusugan ng tao.
Ang katotohanang ito ay pinipilit kaming tingnan ang moral na panig ng isyu.
Kaya, ang pagsasabi ng isang etikal na code dito ay medyo kumplikado. Ang batas
na umiiral ngayon ay nauugnay lamang sa paggamit ng mga hayop sa paglikha ng
mga gamot at bakuna. Ngunit walang natukoy na mga prinsipyo na nagkakasama
sa paggamit ng mga hayop sa biomedical na pagsasaliksik o sa industriya ng
kosmetiko. na malawakang binuo ngayon ("Background ng Isyu"). Makikita na
ang pagbuo at pag-aampon ng mga prinsipyong etikal na nagkakasama sa paggamit
ng mga hayop bilang mga bagay sa mga walang kabuluhan na uri ng pagsasaliksik
ay may mahalagang kahalagahan.
Ang sitwasyon sa industriya ng mga pampaganda ay mas kumplikado at
kontrobersyal. Naniniwala ako na ang kosmetiko industriya at biomedical na
pagsisiyasat ay ganap na magkakaibang mga konsepto dahil ang kanilang paunang
layunin ay naiiba. Sa tulong ng mga pampaganda ay sinusubukan ng mga tao na
palamutihan ang kanilang mga sarili at alamin ang mga ugaling iyon na ibinibigay
ng likas. Ang kanilang kalusugan ay hindi masisira kung wala ito. Ngunit para sa
pagpapaunlad ng iba`t ibang mga sangkap na kosmetiko, ang mga tao ay
gumagawa ng mga hayop, pangunahin ang mga kuneho, ay nagdurusa dahil sa
matinding epekto ng mga sangkap na ito sa kanilang mga katawan. Sa karamihan
ng mga kaso, ang mga hayop ay nakakaramdam ng matinding sakit. Dito,
kinakailangang mag-isip ng pilosopiko at ilagay ang ecosystem sa gitna kapag
gumagawa ng anumang desisyon. Ang prinsipyo ng ecocentrism ay nagbibigay
inspirasyon upang gamutin ang kalikasan at ang ecosystem na katumbas ng mga
tao ayon sa kanilang kahalagahan (Animal Ethies par. 2-3). Ang mga tao ay dapat
na mantain at suportahan ang biodiversity na mayroon sa Earth dahil tinitiyak nito
ang libu-libong mga proseso na nagpapahintulot sa mga tao na mabuhay sa planeta.
Mahirap bigyang katwiran ang pagsubok sa animnl sa cosmetic sphere. Ang mga
Altemative na pamamaraan ng pagsubok ng mga kosmetiko ay dapat na binuo.
dahil sila ay magiging mahalaga para sa parehong mga hayop at tao.

Tulad ng nakikita, ang pagsusuri ng hayop ay isinasagawa sa iba't ibang mga


layunin. Ang ilan sa kanila ay maaaring matuwid. ngunit ang iba ay hindi maaaring
maging. Ang kaso ng pagsubok sa hayop ay mas madaling hatulan dahil sa
paunang layunin nito. Ito ay hindi etikal at hindi dapat isagawa. Sa halip, ang iba
pang mga pamamaraan ng pagsubok sa kosmetiko ay dapat na binuo. Ang
pagsubok sa hayop sa industriya ng pangangalaga ng kalusugan ay mas
kontrobersyal. Maaari itong ibigay sa layunin na magdala ng mga benepisyo sa
kalusugan ng tao at mai-save ang milyun-milyong tao. Ngunit sa parehong oras,
ang nasabing pagsubok ay sumisira sa biodiversity ng planeta at nakakasama sa
lahat ng mga nabubuhay

Ang tanging paraan dito ay maaaring ang paglikha ng wastong pag-codification na


isasaalang-alang ang magkabilang panig ng isyu at susundan ito.

You might also like