JER Estate Tax Lecture
JER Estate Tax Lecture
Gross Estate
(-) Deductions
= Net Estate
x
Applicable Estate Tax Rate (%)
Decedent's Interest
Transfer in Contemplation of Death
Revocable Transfer
Property Passing Under General Power of Appointment
Proceeds of Life Insurance
Prior Interests
Transfers for Insufficient Consideration
Capital of the Surviving Spouse
ESTATE TAX
Inclusions in Gross Estate (Sec. 85 NIRC)
► Decedent’s Interest
► This refers to value of the decedent’s right or expectation (short of
naked title) on a property.
► Revocable Transfers
► The value of any transferred property where the decedent
retained his power to amend, alter or revoke the transfer during his
lifetime. This is regardless of whether he actually exercised his
power or not.
Funeral Expense
Judicial Expense
Claims Against the Estate
Claims Against Insolvent Persons
Mortgage Indebtedness, Taxes and Loss
Vanishing Deduction
Transfer for Public Use
Family Home
ESTATE TAX
Deductions Allowed for estates of a Citizen and a
Resident: (cont’d)
Standard Deduction
Medical Expenses
ESTATE TAX
Deductible Expenses (Sec. 86 (A) NIRC)
► Funeral Expense
► Actual funeral expenses includes cost of clothes for bereavement
or 5% of the gross estate, whichever is lower but in no case to
exceed PhP200,000.00
► Judicial Expense
► Fees of executors, administrators and lawyers as well as expenses
for the preservation of the estate.
► Vanishing Deduction
► Certain percentage of the value of an asset may be deducted from
the gross estate if they were acquired by inheritance or by
gratuitous title by the decedent at a time proximate to the
decedent’s death. Ex. The value of property acquired by decedent
by inheritance at least four years but not more than five years
before his/her death his death may be deducted from his gross
estate to the extent of 20% thereof. If such property was inherited
by the decedent within one year before his death, then, 100% of
the value of such asset is deductible from his gross estate.
► Family Home
► The actual fair market value of the decedent’s family home or
PhP1 Million, whichever is lower.
► Standard Deduction
► The amount of PhP1 Million is deductible, no questions asked.
► Medical Expenses
► Actual medical expenses incurred within one (1) year prior to the
death of the decedent or PhP500,000.00, whichever is lower.
ESTATE TAX
Deductions Allowed for estates of Non Residents Aliens
(Sec. 86 (B) NIRC):
Expenses, Losses, Indebtedness and Taxes
Funeral Expense
Judicial Expense
Claims Against the Estate
Claims Against Insolvent Persons
Mortgage Indebtedness, Taxes and Loss
Vanishing Deduction
►
ESTATE TAX
Exemptions and Reliefs
1 January 2014
Presentation title
PNB vs. Santos, et al. G.R. No. 208293 / Lina Aguilar vs.
Santos, et al. GR No. 208295, December 10, 2014
Facts:
Mr. Angel C. Santos died on March 21, 1991 and left a bank
account in PNB. His children, respondents in this case, presented
the necessary documents to PNB in order to withdraw their
father’s deposit, as follows: 1) Mr. Santos’s Death Certificate; 2)
BIR-issued Certificate of Payment / Exemption from Estate Tax; 3)
Deed of Extrajudicial Settlement; 4) Publisher’s Affidavit; and 5)
Surety Bond.
However, PNB (thru Bank Manager Lina B. Aguilar) informed the
respondents that the deposit had already been released to Mr.
Bernardito Manimbo, who on the other hand, presented the
required documents to PNB sans the BIR-issued Certificate of
Payment/Exemption from Estate Tax.
PNB vs. Santos, et al. (continued..)
Issue:
Was PNB negligent in releasing the deposit to Mr. Manimbo in the
absence of the BIR-issued Certificate of Payment / Exemption
from Estate Tax.
Ruling:
Yes. Section 118 of PD 1158 (now Section 97 of the 1997 Tax
Code) mandates that the bank shall not allow any withdrawal from
the deceased’s deposit account unless the BIR Commissioner has
certified that the taxes imposed thereon have been paid. The
Certificate of Payment/Exemption from Estate Tax is a legal
requirement before the deposit of a decedent is released. The
requirement is based on the assumption that only those with
sufficient and valid claim to the deposit will pay the taxes for it and
that requiring the certificate from the BIR increases the chance
that the deposit will be released only to them.
Rafael Arsenio S. Dizon in his capacity as Judicial
Administrator of the Estate of the deceased Jose P.
Fernandez vs. CTA and CIR, G.R. No. 140944 (April 30, 2008)
Facts:
The BIR assessed the estate of Jose Fernandez for
deficiency estate tax.
The courts ruled that the claims of creditors should not be
allowed in full as deductions in computing the estate tax
liability because the actual payments made by the estate to
the creditors were lower than the claims due to compromise
agreements subsequently entered into by the estate.
Issue:
Can the actual claims of the estate creditors be fully allowed
as deductions from the gross estate despite the fact that the
claims were subsequently reduced or condoned?
Rafael Arsenio S. Dizon (continued…)
Ruling:
Yes. The deductible amount for a claim against the estate is
fixed as of the decedent’s death. Where a lien claimed
against the estate was certain and enforceable on the date
of the decedent’s death, the fact that the creditor
subsequently settled for a lesser amount does not prevent
the estate from deducting the entire amount of the claim for
estate tax purposes.
Estate tax is a tax on the act of transferring property by will
or intestacy. As the tax is levied at a fixed time, which is
upon death, the net value of the property transferred should
be ascertained, as nearly as possible, as of that time.
Rafael Arsenio S. Dizon (continued..)
Issues:
► Should ‘intent to evade taxes’ exist in the case of false
returns for purposes of applying the 10-year prescriptive
period to assess?
► Did petitioners correctly compute the amount of vanishing
deduction from the estate of Teresita Reyes?
Estate of Fidel F. Reyes (continued…)
Ruling:
1. No. The Supreme Court already made a distinction
between “false” and “fraudulent” returns in the case of Aznar
vs. Court of Tax Appeals. Intent to evade taxes need not be
present in a false return for purposes of the 10-year
prescriptive period to assess. Otherwise, there will be no
distinction between false and fraudulent returns and the law
would not have provided for the distinct situations.
Thus, although there are no indicia of fraud in this case, the
Court found the returns to be false in view of the substantial
underdeclaration of properties and overstatement of
vanishing deductions in the estates of Fidel F. Reyes and
Teresita R. Reyes, respectively.
Estate of Fidel F. Reyes (continued…)
2. No.
The “initial basis” (or property previously taxed) used by
petitioners in computing for the vanishing deduction is 13/24
of the gross estate of Fidel F. Reyes (Fidel had 12 heirs – 11
children and Teresita, as surviving spouse), whereby
petitioners added ½ of the conjugal property which belongs
to Teresita (or 12/24) and 1/24 which is Teresita’s inheritance
share from Fidel.
The “initial basis” should instead be 1/24 only, which is the
inheritance share of Teresita R. Reyes in Fidel Reyes’s gross
estate.
People of the Phils. Luz A. Santos and Ricardo A. Santos
C.T.A. Crim. Case No. O-246, May 20, 2015
Facts:
A case was filed against Luz and Ricardo A. Santos, legal
heirs of Iluminada a. Santos, for violation of Section 255 of
the 1997 NIRC for failure to file an Estate Tax Return and
failure to pay the related Estate Tax, by use of a falsified
Deed of Transfer of real property and other documents.
People of the Phils. (continued…)
Issue:
Is Ricardo guilty of violation of Section 255 of the NIRC?
Ruling:
No. The prosecution failed to prove all the three elements of
the offense beyond reasonable doubt, as follows:
► The accused is a person required to make or file a return and/or pay
the tax;
► The accused failed to make or file the return and/or pay the tax at the
time required by law; and
► Failure to make or file the return and/or pay the tax, was willful.
People of the Phils. (continued…)
The Tax Code provides that six (6) months after the death of
the decedent, it is the duty of the executor, the administrator,
or the heirs of the decedent to file the Estate Tax Return. It is
also the duty of the said executor, administrator, or heir/s to
pay the Estate Tax at the time the return is filed. In the
present case, no one was appointed as executor or
administrator. Therefore, the responsibility lies upon the heirs
to file the return and pay the tax. As an heir, Ricardo is duty
bound to make or file a return and/or pay the tax.
►
People of the Phils. (continued…)