The document discusses activity-based costing (ABC), including identifying activities and allocating overhead costs, calculating activity-based rates, and assigning costs to products. ABC aims to more accurately assign overhead costs compared to traditional costing. Benefits include more accurate product costing, enhanced overhead cost control, and better management decisions. Limitations include implementation costs and some arbitrary allocations remain.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views
2AB3 CH 5 Notes
The document discusses activity-based costing (ABC), including identifying activities and allocating overhead costs, calculating activity-based rates, and assigning costs to products. ABC aims to more accurately assign overhead costs compared to traditional costing. Benefits include more accurate product costing, enhanced overhead cost control, and better management decisions. Limitations include implementation costs and some arbitrary allocations remain.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9
L01: Recognize difference between traditional costing and ABC, and understand the nature of ABC:
Traditional Costing Systems:
- Probably impossible to determine exact cost of a product or service - Product’s cost can be estimated most accurately when this cost can be traced directly to the product produced or the service provided - DM and DL costs are the easiest to determine because they can be traced directly to the product by examining materials requi sition forms and payroll time sheets - OH costs are indirect or joint costs that generally cannot be easily or directly traced to individual products or services → we use estimates to assign OH costs to products and services - Most difficult part of calculating accurate unit costs is determining the proper amount of OH cost to assign to each product, service, or job - Previously used a predetermined OH rate for OH costs
Need for a New Approach:
- Historically, the use of DL as the activity base made sense because DL made up a large portion of total manufacturing cost - There was a high correlation between DL and the incurrence of OH cost - DL thus became the most popular basis for allocating OH However: - With technological innovation, global competition, and automation, the manufacturing environment changed dramatically - Amount of DL used in many industries has significantly decreased - Total OH cost from depreciation on expensive equipment and machinery from utilities, repars, and maintenance have significantly increased - When there is little to no correlation between DL and OH, it is inappropriate to use plant-wide predetermined OH rates that are based on DL - Comapnies that use OH rates based on DL when this correlation does not exist experience significant product cost distortions - To avoid distortions many companies now use machine hours as the basis for allocating OH in an automated manufacturing environment → but this can be inadequate as the only plant-wide basis for allocating all OH - Companies with complex processes need to use multiple allocation bases to calculate accurate product costs - An OH cost allocation method that uses multiple bases is activity-based costing
Activity Based Costing:
- Activity-based costing: - Approach for allocating OH costs - Specifically, ABC allocates OH to multiple activity cost pools, and then assigns the activity cost pools to products and services by using cost drivers - Activity: Any event, action, transaction, or work sequence that incurs costs when producing a product or performing a service - Activity cost pool: The OH costs attributed to a distinct activity (ex: ordering materials) - Cost driver: Any factor or activity that has a direct cause-effect relationship with the resoufces consumed - The reasoning behind ABC cost allocation is simple: - Products consume activities, and activities consume resources
Steps of ABC: Activities and related cost drivers:
L02: Apply ABC to a manufacturer:
Step 1: Identify and Classify Activities and Allocate OH to Cost Pools: - A well designed ABC system begins with an analysis of the activities performed to manufacture a product or provide a service - Analysis should identify all resource-consuming activities - It requires documenting every activity undertaken to accomplish a task Step 2: Identify Cost Drivers: - After costs are allocated to the activity cost pools, the company must identify the cost drivers for each cost pool - The cost driver must accurately measure the actual consumption of the activity by the various products - To achieve accurate costing, a high degree of correlation must exist between the cost driver and the actual consumption of the OH cost in the cost pool - This is an area that has benefitted greatly from company data collection efforts at nearly every stage of the value chain - By applying analytics to these data, the company can increase the likelihood that cost drivers are closely related to resource consumption - The availability and ease of obtaining data relatin to the cost driver are important factors that must be considered in its selection
Step 3: Calculate OH Rates:
- Company must calculate an activity based OH rate per cost driver
Step 4: Assign OH Costs to products:
- Necessary to know the use of cost drivers for each product Unit Cost Comparison:
- Shows that costs under traditional costing are often misleading and different from ABC - ABC allows more accurate assignment of MOH costs
L03: Benefits and Limitations of ABC:
Benefits of ABC: - ABC employs more cost pools and therefore results in more accurate product costing - ABC leads to enhanced control over OH costs - ABC supports better management decisions Advantage of multiple cost pools: - Main mechanism by which ABC increases product cost accuracy - Costs are assigned more accurately on the basis of the cost drivers used to produce each product - In many companies, the number of activities can be substantial
Assigning non-manufacturing overhead costs:
- Non-manufacturing OH costs included in selling and admin expenses represent a significant portion of company costs: - GAAP require that these costs be expensed during the current period as period costs, rather than assigning these costs to products - To gain better understanding of product and/or customer profitability, many companies use ABC to assign some non-manufacturing costs to products or customers - If shipping costs are included in the selling expense category, these costs can usually be directly traced to specific products - Incurrence of other costs included in selling expenses can vary considerably across products or customers
Classification of Activity levels:
- Unit-level activities: - Performed for each unit of production - Batch-level activities: - Performed every time a company produces another batch of product - The amount of time spent setting up machines increases with the number of batches produced, not with the number of units produced - Product-level activities: - Performed every time a company produces a new type of product - The amount of time spent on testing activities increases with the number of products a company produces - Facility-level activities: - Required to support or sustain an entire production process - These costs do not vary as a function of the number of units, batches, or products Advantage of enforced cost control; - Decision tool: The activity analysis flowchart is extended to identify each activity as value-added or non value-added - Companies use activity flowcharts to help identify the ABC activities
- Value Added Activities:
- Essential activities of a company’s operations that increase the perceived value of a product or service to customers - Supervision of value-added activities is in itself a value-added activity - Non Value Added Activities: - Non-essential activities, that if eliminated would not reduce the perceived value of a company’s product or service - Simply add cost to, or increase the time spent on a product or service without increasing its perceived value
Advantage of Better Management Decisions:
- ABC information helps establish performance standards within the company and benchmark its performance against other companies - Can help increase profitability, improve marketing strategy, and increase employee efficiency Some limitations of ABC and knowing when to use ABC: - ABC can be expensive to use: - The increased cost of identifying multiple activities and applying numerous cost drivers discourages many companies from using ABC - ABC systems are also more complex than traditional systems - Some arbitrary allocations remain: - Even though more OH costs can be assigned directly to products trough ABC, some OH costs still need to be allocated by arbitrary cost drivers How to know when to use ABC: - Product lines differ greatly in volume and manufacturing complexity - Product lines are numerous and diverse, requiring various degrees of support services - OH costs constitute a significant portion of total costs - The manufacturing process or the number of products has changed significantly - Production or marketing managers are ignoring data when pricing or making other product decisions → use “bootleg” costing data
Activity Based Management:
- An extension of ABC from a product costing system to a management function that focuses on reducing costs and improving processes and decision making - Also referred to as Cost Engineering, or Strategic Cost Management
L04: ABC in Service industries:
- Although initially developed and implemented by manufacturers, ABC is also widely used in service industries - Overall objective of ABC in a service firm is no different than it is in a manufacturing company - The objective is to identify the key activities that generate costs and to keep track of how many of those activities are completed for each service performed - A larger proportion of OH costs are company-wide costs → compared to manufacturing companies Traditional costing: ABC: