0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views

Fild311 Week+3

Uploaded by

Angeline Javiee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views

Fild311 Week+3

Uploaded by

Angeline Javiee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 46

FILD 311

WEEK 3
H A R A CTE R IS TICS
C
ED T O B E A G OOD
NEED
RESEARCHER
● Knowledge-oriente
d
● Open-minded
● Hardworking
● Resourceful
● Scientific in attitud
e
COMMON
PROBLEMS
ENCOUNTERED
IN RESEARCH
● Personal experi
en
● Existing progra ces in life
ms that need
to be improved
● Further inquiry
of a
conducted study
● Through consu
ltation with
experts
● Selects on a pro
blem area and
specifies research
● Examines and questions
resea
based from review rches data
existing
results and define
● Formulates res terms
earchable
questions
STEPS IN
N D E RST AN DIN G
U
RESEARCH
● Selects a resea
rch design
● Determines th
e research metho
● Describes and d
selects the
respondents to be
used in the
study
● Selects tests to
score
● Conducts the s
tudy
● Analyzes the d
ata and
determines the im
plications
of the researches
● Publishes the r
esults of his
study
RESEARCH
APPROACHES
QUANTITATIVE R
ESEARCH- uses
objective measurement
to
gather numeric
data that are
used to answer qu
estions or test
predetermined hy
pothesis
QUALITATIVE
RESEARCH-
focuses on u
nderstanding
social phenomen
a from the
perspective of
the human
participants in nat
ural settings.
MIXED METHODS
RESEARCH- uses b
quantitative and q oth
ualitative approac
The end result is hes.
findings that may
more dependable be
and provide a m
complete explana ore
tion of the rese
problem than eith arch
er method alone c
provide. ould
Q U A NTI TA TI VE
RESEARCH
DESIGN
CLASSIFICATION:
● EXPERIMENTA
L
● NONEXPERIME
NTAL
EXPERIMENTAL R
ESEARCH- involve
study of the effec sa
t of the systematic
manipulation of o
ne variable (s) on
another variable.
Experimental/IV-m
anipulated variable
DV- observed/me
asured variable
QUASI-EXPERIME
NTAL
RESEARCH- resea
rch in which the
investigator can
control the
treatment and th
e measurement
of the depende
nt variable but
cannot control as
signment of the
subjects to treatm
ent.
NONEXPERIMENT
AL
RESEARCH- resear
ch
that does not invo
lve
the manipulation
of
variables
EX POST FACTO re
search- a type
of research tha
t attempts to
determine the c
ause s for, or
the consequences
of,
differences that a
lready exist
in groups of individ
uals.
Ex: What is the eff
ect
of part-time work
on
school achievemen
t of
high school studen
ts?
CORRELATIONAL
RESEARCH- att
empts to
determine the e
xtent and
the direction of the
relationship betw
een two or
more variables
SURVEY RESEARC
H(descriptive
research)- uses
instruments
such as questio
nnaires and
interviews to gather
information from
groups of
individuals
QUALITATIVE
RESEARCH
DESIGN
Basic interpretati
ve studies- it
provides a desc
riptive account
targeted to u
nderstanding a
phenomenon usin
g data that may
be collected in a v
ariety of ways.
(Ex: describing h
ow teachers perc
their roles in select eive
ing curriculum)
Case Studies-quali
tative
examination of a s
ingle
individual, group,
event, or
institution (charac
teristics
of
this individual..)
EXPLANATORY CA
SE
explanation for a q STUDY- focuses on an
u
not up for interpre estion or a phenomenon. It is
tation
Example: A certain
au
crashes that are ca tomobile has a series of
use
the crashes are a re d by faulty brakes. All of
sult of brakes not
effective on icy ro being
ads.
** the researcher
will explain the cra
detailed causes of sh, and the
a brake failure. Th
investigate what a ey will
ctions could have
to prevent the failu been taken
re
EXPLORATORY CA
SE STUDY- precurso
large-scale resear
ch project. It’s goal r to a formal,
further investigatio is to prove that
n is necessary.
Example: Veteran
s
combat. Research coming home from active
ers
PTSD and are awar are aware that these vets have
e that the actions
cause PTSD. of war are what
** researcher coul
d
events are more lik develop a study that certain war
el
demonstrated, a la y to cause PSTD. Once it is
rge-scale research
could be done
MULTIPLE-CASE
STUDIES OR
STUDIES- use info COLLECTIVE
rmation from diffe
formulate the ca re
se for a new stu nt studies to
past studies allow d y.
s additional inform The use of
needing to spen at
d more time an ion without
additional studies. d money on
Example: PTSD issu
e
**when studying
wartime PTSD, a what contributes most to
researcher could
studies from differe use different
nt war.
INTRINSIC CASE S
TU
a case wherein th DY- study of
e
is the primary inte subject itself
wasn’t so much rest. (the study
a
but about the p bout psychology,
ers
how her experienc on herself, and
es shaped who sh
was) e
INSTRUMENTAL
CASE STUDY- use
case to gain s a
phenomenon in si g h ts into a
Example: a re
se
interested in child archer who is
o
set up a study wit besity rate might
h middle school. T
focus is b/w the
exercise, why cert he
children become o ain
bese
TYPES OF SUBJEC
TS OF CASE STUDIE
S
1.PERSON
2.GROUP
3.LOCATION
4.ORGANIZATION
/COMPANY
5.EVENT
INTERVIEW:
-Open-ended
-Focused (confirm
not to gain new in information,
formation)
Document or Con
tent
Analysis- focuses
on analyzing
and interpreting r
ecorded
material to learn a
bout human
behavior. Materia
l may be
public records, tap
es, diaries,
etc.
Ethnography- in-d
epth
study of naturally
occurring behavior
within a cultur
e or
social group
Grounded
Theory-
designed to de
velop a
theory of social
phenomena base
d on the
field data collec
ted in a
study
Historical Researc
h-
analyzes docume
nts and
artifacts and/or us
es
interviews with
eyewitnesses to g
ain insight
into past events.
Narrative Inquiry-
researcher examin
e the
stories of people t
ell about
their lives and co-c
onstruct a
narrative analysis
of those
stories
Phenomenologica
l Studies-
begin with the ass
umption
that multiple reali
ties are
rooted in subjects

perspectives.
MI XE D ME THO D
RESEARCH
DESIGN
Sequential Explan
a tory
Characterized by:
C
of quantitative da ollection and analysis
ta
collection and ana followed by a
lysis of qualitative
data.
Purpose: To use q
ua
assist in explaining litative results to
and interpreting th
findings of a quan e
titative study.
Sequential Explora
tory
Characterized by:
An
qualitative data co initial phase of
ll
followed by a pha ection and analysis
se
collection and ana of quantitative data
lysis.
Purpose: To explo
re
This strategy may a phenomenon.
als
developing and te o be useful when
sting a new instru
ment
Sequential Transf
ormative
Characterized by:
Coll
analysis of either q ection and
u
qualitative data firs antitative or
t.
integrated in the in The results are
terpretation phase
.
Purpose: To emplo
y
best serve a theore the methods that
tical perspective.
Concurrent Triang
ulation
Characterized by:
Tw
used to confirm, c o or more methods
ro
corroborate findin ss-validate, or
gs within a study.
collection is concu Data
rrent.
Purpose: Generall
y,
used to overcome both methods are
a weakness in usin
one method with g
the strengths of
another.
Concurrent Neste
d
Characterized by:
A
that gives priority nested approach
to
and guides the pro one of the methods
ject, while anothe
embedded or “ne r is
sted.”
Purpose: The purp
o
method is to addre se of the nested
ss a different
question than the
dominant or to se
information from ek
different levels.
Concurrent Transf
ormative
Characterized by:
Th
theoretical perspe e use of a
ctiv
purpose or researc e reflected in the
h questions of the
study to guide all
methodological
choices.
Purpose: To evalu
ate
perspective at diffe a theoretical
rent levels of analy
sis.

You might also like