Gitos Forecast Notes in Remedial Law.2023 2
Gitos Forecast Notes in Remedial Law.2023 2
in
REMEDIAL LAW
for
by:
I. JURISDICTION
1. It is the power and authority of the court to hear, try, and decide the
case (Continental Micronesia, Inc., vs. Basco, GR Nos. 178382-83, September
23, 2015; Barangay Mayamot vs. Antipolo City, GR No. 187349, August 17,
2016). Jurisdiction of the court includes the authority to execute its
decision. It includes the power of the court to control the execution
of its decision (Echegaray vs. Secretary of Justice, 301 SCRA 96, 108).
NOTE:
If one wants to know the jurisdiction of the court, he must look into
the law on jurisdiction not the rules of court or any procedural rule. If
jurisdiction over the subject matter is conferred by law, then: 1)
It cannot be subject of agreement of the parties. 2) It cannot be
acquired, waived, enlarged, or diminished by any act or omission of
the parties. 3) It cannot be conferred by acquiescence by the court.
1
4. When may jurisdiction be challenged?
NOTE:
1. It has been long settled that while a court acquires jurisdiction over
the case only upon payment of the docket fees, its non-payment at the
time of the filing of the complaint does not automatically cause the
dismissal of the case, provided the fees are paid within a reasonable
time. Even inadequate payment of filing will not divest the court of
its jurisdiction. This rule is applicable even if the claim for damages of
the plaintiffs is metered or progressing as case the case is pending
(Unicapital vs. Consing, G.R. Nos. 175277 & 175285, September
11, 2013).
4
8. What are the elements of a cause of action? The following are the
elements of the a cause of action: (a) a right in favor of the plaintiff
by whatever means and under whatever law it arises or is created; (b)
an obligation on the part of the named defendant to respect or not to
violate such right; and (c) an act or omission on the part of the named
defendant violative of the right of the plaintiff or constituting a breach
of the obligation of defendant to the plaintiff for which the latter may
maintain an action for recovery (Mercene v. Government Service
Insurance System, G.R. No. 192971, January 10, 2018).
13. What are the conditions for a proper joinder of causes of action?
A proper joinder of causes of action must comply with the following
conditions: 1) The party joining causes of action shall comply with the
rules on joinder of parties. 2) The joinder shall not include special civil
actions or actions governed by special rules; 3) Where the causes of
actions are between the same parties but pertain to different venues
or jurisdictions, the joinder may be allowed in the RTC provided one
of the causes of actions falls within the jurisdiction of said court and
venue lies therein; 4) Where the claims in all causes of action are
principally for recovery of money, the aggregate amount claimed shall
be the test of jurisdiction (Section 5, Rule 2).
V. PARTIES
10. In the case of Aceron v. Ang, G.R. No. 186993, August 22, 2012, a case
for collection of a sum of money was filed by Atty. Aceron in behalf
of Theodore and Nancy Ang. Theodore and Nancy reside in
California, they are non-residents, while defendants reside in Bacolod.
The action was filed by Atty. Aceron in Quezon City where he resides.
A motion to dismiss was filed but it was denied by RTC. The question
is: is the representative-lawyer a real party in interest, making
the filing of the complaint in court to be in the place where he
resides? Answer: NO. The representative is just a representative and
NOT a real party in interest.
12. What is a class suit? When the subject matter of controversy is one
of common or general interest to many persons so numerous that it
is impracticable to join them all as parties, a number of them which
the court finds to be sufficiently numerous and representative as to
fully protect the interest of all concerned may sue or defend for the
benefit of all. (Sec. 12, Rule 3).
7
13. Requisites of class suits. 1) The subject matter of the controversy
is one of common or general interest to many persons. 2) The parties
are so numerous that it is impracticable to bring them all before the
court. 3) The object of the suit is to obtain relief for or against
numerous persons.
14. What is common or general interest? A class suit does not require
a commonality of interest in the questions involved in the suit. What
is required by the Rules is a common or general interest in the subject
matter of the litigation. The “subject matter” of the litigation meant
the physical, the things real or personal, the money, lands, chattels,
and the like, in relation to the suit which is prosecuted and not the
delict or wrong committed by the defendant (Mathay vs.
Consolidated Bank & Trust Co., 58, SCRA 559, 571).
15. What is the duty of the lawyer if case of a party dies? If the party
dies and the claim is not extinguished, his duty is to inform the court
of such fact within 30 days after such death and to give the name and
address of the legal representatives of the deceased party. (Sec. 16,
Rule 3).
17. What is the rule in an action for sum of money if one of the
defendant dies? When the action is for recovery of money, arising
from contract, express or implied and the defendant dies before entry
of final judgment in the court in which the action was pending at the
time of such death, it shall not be dismissed but it shall be allowed to
continue until final judgment. Favorable judgement shall be claimed
in the estate proceedings of the deceased defendant (Sec. 20, Rule 3).
NOTE: The favorable judgement cannot be in action for sum of
money arising from contract express or implied when the
defendant dies, subject of motion for execution. The judgment
shall be filed as a claim in the settlement of estate pursuant to
Section 5, Rule 86. HOWEVER: if the action for sum of money
based on injury to person or property, it need not be filed in the
settlement of estate because it may be executed against the executor
or administrator (Section 1, Rule 87).
18. What are actions that survive? The following actions survive: a)
action to recover real or personal property; b) action to enforce lien
thereon; c) action to recover damages for an injury to person; d)
action for quasi-delict (Section 1, Rule 87).
19. Respondents obtained several loans from Maybank. The loans were
secured a real estate mortgage over the properties respectively owned
by Sian Agricultural Corp., Sebastian, Dela Pena, Gonzales. All of the
mortgagees executed a SPA in favor of the respondent allowing the
8
latter to mortgage their respective properties to Maybank to secure the
loans of the respondent. The loans were not collected after 17 years
nor any action filed on the said loans. Respondent filed a Petition with
the RTC to cancel the annotations of mortgage on the respective
certificate of titles over the land of the mortgagees.
No. Because the case instituted by the respondent does not involve
the properties of the principal. The mortgage contract itself does not
involve real property, but merely the right to foreclose upon such real
property should the necessary legal pre-conditions are met, such as a
breach in the principal contract to which the mortgage is merely an
accessory of (PNB-Republic Bank (Maybank) vs. Sian-Limsiaco
G.R. No. 196323, February 8, 2021, J. Hernando).
VI. VENUE
10
9. What if a promissory note has no venue stipulation, but there is a
mother loan agreement. The amount appearing on the promissory
note was not paid when due so an action for collection for sum of
money was instituted. What venue will have to be followed? The
Supreme Court said that if the mother contract was directly connected
and intertwined with the promissory note, then the promissory note
will be bound by the venue stipulation.
VII. PLEADINGS
12
compulsory, but permissive since the amount exceeds the jurisdiction
of the Court.
16. What are the grounds to deny third-party claim? The third
(fourth, etc.)-party complaint shall be denied admission, and the court
shall require the defendant to institute a separate action, where: (a)
the third (fourth, etc.)-party defendant cannot be located within thirty
(30) calendar days from the grant of such leave; (b) matters extraneous
to the issue in the principal case are raised; or (c) the effect would be
to introduce a new and separate controversy into the action (Section
11, Rule 6).
18. What is the effect if the judicial affidavit of the witnesses is not
attached to the pleading? They may not be allowed to testify
(Section 6, Rule 7).
19. Amendment of the Pleading. A party may amend his pleading once
as a matter of right at any time before a responsive pleading is served
13
or, in the case of a reply, at any time within ten (10) days after it is
served (Section 2, Rule 10). Except as provided in the next preceding
Section, substantial amendments may be made only upon leave of
court. But such leave shall be refused if it appears to the court
that the motion was made with intent to delay or confer
jurisdiction on the court, or the pleading stated no cause of
action from the beginning which could be amended (Section 3,
Rule 10). PLEASE TAKE NOTE: There are now grounds to deny
the motion for leave to admit amended pleading. The grounds are
provided in Section 3, Rule 10.
22. Debtor executed 3 PN’s in favour of the Creditor. One of the PN’s
became due and demandable. Thus, debtor not paying the PN,
creditor filed a collection suit against the debtor. While the case is
pending, the other PNs became due and demandable also. The
Creditor included the last two PN as evidences in the case pending. It
was introduced without the objection of the Debtor? Can the Court
render judgment on the last two PNs? NO. Section 5 thereof
applies to situations wherein evidence not within the issues raised in
the pleadings is presented by the parties during the trial, and to
conform to such evidence the pleadings are subsequently amended on
motion of a party. Thus, a complaint which fails to state a cause of
action may be cured by evidence presented during the trial. However,
the curing effect under Section 5 is applicable only if a cause of action
in fact exists at the time the complaint is filed, but the complaint is
defective for failure to allege the essential facts (Swagman Hotels
and Travel vs. CA, 455 SCRA 175).
14
24. May amendment be made to correct the jurisdictional defect
after an Answer was filed? NO. The amendment would require
leave of court, a matter which requires the exercise of discretion. The
exercise of this discretion requires the performance of a positive act
by the court. If it grants the amendment, it would be acting on a
complaint over which it has no jurisdiction (Section 3, Rule 10;
Campos Rueda Corp., vs. Bautista, 6 SCRA 240).
28. What are the defenses which are incompatible with the
admission of the due execution and genuineness of the
actionable document? The following defenses are cut off: a)
Forgery of document; b) Lack of authority to execute the document;
c) The party charged signed the document in some other capacity than
that alleged in the pleading; d) The document was never delivered; e)
Document was not in the words and figures as set out in the pleading
(See: Hibberd vs. Rohde and Mcmillian, 32 Phil. 476; Imperial
Textile Mills vs. CA, 183 SCRA 584).
1. What are the modes of filing? The following are the modes of filing:
a) Submitting personally the original thereof, plainly indicated as such,
to the court; b) Sending them by registered mail; c) Sending them by
accredited courier; or d) Transmitting them by electronic mail or other
electronic means as may be authorized by the Court in places where
the court is electronically equipped (Section 2, Rule 13).
2. What are the modes of service? The following are the modes of
service: a) personal service; b) mail; c) accredited courier; d)
electronic mail, facsimile transmission, other electronic means as may
be authorized by the Court; or e) as provided for in international
conventions to which the Philippines is a party (Section 5, Rule 13).
13. NOTE: The court reiterated the rule that the impossibility of prompt,
personal service should be shown by stating in the proof of service that
efforts were made to find the defendant personally and that said efforts
failed; hence resort to substituted service. Since no such explanation
was made, there was a failure to faithfully, strictly, and fully comply
with the requirements of substituted service (Miranda vs. Court of
Appeals, 326 SCRA 278).
17
14. When is summons by publication allowed? A) In action in rem and
quasi in rem. B) the identity and whereabouts of the defendant are
unknown (Section 16, Rule 14). C) When the defendant is a resident but
temporarily absent of the Philippines (Section 18, Rule 14). D) Action
against non-resident and is not found in the Philippines (Section 17, Rule
14).
2. What is the procedure for litigious motion? The movant shall serve
copy of the litigious motion to the opposite party. The opposite party
shall file his or her comment or opposition within five (5) days from
receipt thereof. The Court shall resolve the motion within fifteen (15)
days from receipt of the comment or opposition or the expiration of
the period to file the same (Section 5, Rule 15).
5. What are the grounds that if granted would make the dismissal
with prejudice? The following grounds if granted would make the
dismissal with prejudice: 1) res judicata; 2) prescription; 3)
extinguishment of obligation; and 4) statute of frauds (Section 13,
Rule 15).
7. What are the grounds by which the court may dismiss the case
due to the fault of the plaintiff? The court may dismiss the action
on the following grounds: 1) Failure of the plaintiff to present
evidence in chief; 2) Failure to prosecute his action for an
unreasonable period of time; 3) Failure of the plaintiff to comply with
the Rules of Court; 4) Failure of the plaintiff to comply with the order
of the court. NOTE: the dismissal on these grounds is with prejudice
unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
19
2. What is the effect of failure of appearance from either of the
party or lawyer? When duly notified, the failure of the plaintiff and
counsel to appear without valid cause when so required, pursuant to
the next preceding Section, shall cause the dismissal of the action. The
dismissal shall be with prejudice, unless otherwise ordered by the
court. A similar failure on the part of the defendant and counsel shall
be caused to allow the plaintiff to present his or her evidence ex-
parte within ten (10) calendar days from termination of pre-trial, and
the court to render judgment on the basis of the evidence offered
(Section 5, Rule 18). NOTE: the same effect if case of failure to file
pre-trial brief (Section 6, Rule 18).
20
9. What may be asked during the taking of deposition? Rule 23,
SECTION 2. Scope of examination. — Unless otherwise ordered
by the court as provided by Section 16 or 18 of this Rule, the deponent
may be examined regarding any matter, not privileged, which is
relevant to the subject of the pending action, whether relating to the
claim or defense of any other party, including the existence,
description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any books,
documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of
persons having knowledge of relevant facts.
15. Failure to act on the request for admission, the effect is implied
admission. RULE 26, SECTION 2. Implied Admission. — Each
of the matters of which an admission is requested shall be deemed
admitted unless, within a period designated in the request, which shall
21
not be less than fifteen (15) days after service thereof, or within such
further time as the court may allow on motion, the party to whom the
request is directed files and serves upon the party requesting the
admission a sworn statement either denying specifically the matters of
which an admission is requested or setting forth in detail the reasons
why he cannot truthfully either admit or deny those matters.
17. Effect of failure to file and serve request. RULE 26, SECTION
5. Effect of Failure to File and Serve Request for Admission. —
Unless otherwise allowed by the court for good cause shown and to
prevent a failure of justice, a party who fails to file and serve a request
for admission on the adverse party of material and relevant facts at
issue which are, or ought to be, within the personal knowledge of the
latter, shall not be permitted to present evidence on such facts.
18. Po vs. CA, 164 SCRA 668. A party should not be compelled to admit
matters of fact already admitted by his pleading and concerning which
there is no issue, nor should he be required to make a second denial
of those already denied in his answer to the complaint. A request for
admission is not intended to merely reproduce or reiterate the
allegations of the requesting party's pleading but should set forth
relevant evidentiary matters of fact, or documents described in and
exhibited with the request, whose purpose is to establish said party's
cause of action or defense. Unless it serves that purpose, it is, as
correctly observed by the Court of Appeals, 'pointless, useless' and 'a
mere redundancy.'
22
20. When may the physical and mental examination be ordered. In
an action in which the mental or physical condition of a party is in
controversy, the court in which the action is pending may in its
discretion order him to submit to a physical or mental examination by
a physician (Section 1, Rule 28).
21. The order for examination may be made only on motion for
good cause shown and upon notice to the party to be examined
and to all other parties, and shall specify the time, place,
manner, conditions and scope of the examination and the
person or persons by whom it is to be made (Section 2, Rule 28).
22. If requested by the party examined, the party causing the examination
to be made shall deliver to him a copy of a detailed written report of
the examining physician setting out his findings and conclusions.
After such request and delivery, the party causing the examination to
be made shall be entitled upon request to receive from the party
examined a like report of any examination, previously or thereafter
made, of the same mental or physical condition. If the party examined
refuses to deliver such report, the court on motion and notice may
make an order requiring delivery on such terms as are just, and if a
physician fails or refuses to make such a report the court may exclude
his testimony if offered at the trial (Section 3, Rule 28).
24
4. Leave of court is not 4. It may be with or without
required. leave of court.
25
5. What are the different manners of denying an allegation? 1) By
specifically denying the allegation and setting forth the substance
upon which one relies his denial. 2) By specifically denying some part
of the allegation and denying the rest. 3) By specifically denying the
allegation for lack of knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the
truth or falsity of the allegation.
26
9. May the ruling of the Court on motion for judgment on the
pleading or summary judgment be subject of petition for
certiorari?
NOTE:
27
to file? - Court which rendered the judgment, final order, order
denying appeal or court which conducted the proceedings.
11. Where and how do you appeal the decision of the CA,
Sandiganbayan, or CTA, en banc?
10. May a party whose property was attached recover damages from
the attaching party though the former lost the case? Yes. This is
implied from Section 20, Rule 57 which provides that: “An application
for damages on account of improper, irregular or excessive
attachment must be filed before the trial or before appeal is perfected
or before the judgment becomes executory, with due notice to the
attaching party and his surety or sureties.” (Carlos vs. Sandoval, 471
ACRA 266, 289-290).
30
13. Is the rule on contemporaneous service of summons applicable
to application for preliminary injunction? YES. When an
application for a writ of preliminary injunction or a temporary
restraining order is included in a complaint or any initiatory pleading,
the case, if filed in a multiple-sala court, shall be raffled only after
notice to and in the presence of the adverse party or the person to be
enjoined. In any event, such notice shall be preceded, or
contemporaneously accompanied, by service of summons, together
with a copy of the complaint or initiatory pleading and the applicant's
affidavit and bond, upon the adverse party in the Philippines (Sec. 4
(c), Rule 58).
14. Are there exceptions? YES. Where the summons could not be
served personally or by substituted service despite diligent efforts, or
the adverse party is a resident of the Philippines temporarily absent
therefrom or is a nonresident thereof, the requirement of prior or
contemporaneous service of summons shall not apply (Sec. 4 (c),
Rule 58).
16. May TRO be issued ex-parte? YES. If it shall appear from facts
shown by affidavits or by the verified application that great or
irreparable injury would result to the applicant before preliminary
injunction can be heard, the court to which the application for
preliminary injunction was made, may issue ex parte a temporary
restraining order to be effective only for a period of twenty (20) days
from service on the party or person sought to be enjoined x x x.
(Section 5, Rule 58).
17. May TRO be issued by the EJ? If the matter is of extreme urgency
and the applicant will suffer grave injustice and irreparable injury, the
executive judge of a multiple-sala court or the presiding judge of a
single-sala court may issue ex-parte a temporary restraining order
effective for only seventy-two (72) hours from issuance but he shall
immediately comply with the provisions of the next preceding section
as to service of summons and the documents to be served therewith
(Sec. 5, Rule 58).
18. What should the judge where the case is raffled do after the EJ
issued the 72-hour TRO? Within the aforesaid seventy-two (72)
hours, the judge before whom the case is raffled shall conduct a
summary hearing to determine whether the temporary restraining
order shall be extended until the application for preliminary injunction
31
can be heard. In no case shall the total period of effectivity of the
temporary restraining order exceed twenty (20) days, including the
original seventy-two hours provided herein (Sec. 5, Rule 57).
19. Is 20-day TRO extendible? NO. The Rules provide: “In no case
shall the total period of effectivity of the temporary restraining order
exceed twenty (20) days, including the original seventy-two hours
provided herein.” (Sect. 5, Rule 58).
32
6. What are the subject matter in a petition for declaratory relief?
Deed; Will; Contract or other written instrument; Statute; Executive
order or regulation; Ordinance; Any other governmental regulation.
NOTE: These are exclusive.
12. Does the filing of petition stay the proceedings? NO. The petition
shall not interrupt the course of the principal case unless a temporary
restraining order or a writ of preliminary injunction has been issued
against the public respondent from further proceeding in the case
(Sec. 7, Rule 65).
13. What is the period to file the petition? The petition may be filed
not later than sixty (60) days from notice of the judgment, order or
resolution sought to be assailed in the Supreme Court or, if it relates
to the acts or omissions of a lower court or of a corporation, board,
officer or person, in the Regional Trial Court exercising jurisdiction
over the territorial area as defined by the Supreme Court. It may also
be filed in the Court of Appeals whether or not the same is in aid of
its appellate jurisdiction, or in the Sandiganbayan if it is in aid of its
jurisdiction. If it involves the acts or omissions of a quasi-judicial
agency, and unless otherwise provided by law or these Rules, the
petition shall be filed in and cognizable only by the Court of Appeals.
(Sec. 4, Rule 65).
14. May the period be extended? Yes, when: Most persuasive and
weighty reasons. To relieve a litigant from injustice. Good faith of the
defaulting party. Compelling circumstances. Merits of the case. Cause
not entirely attributable to the defaulting party. No showing that it is
frivolous. In the name of substantial justice and fair play. Importance
of issues involved (Labao vs. Flores, 634 SCRA 723).
19. Mandamus will lie to compel the doing of a ministerial act. The
act is ministerial if the act should be performed under a given state of
facts, in a prescribed manner, in obedience to the mandate of a legal
authority, without regard to the exercise of judgment upon the
propriety or impropriety of the act done (Cudia vs. Superintendent
of PMA, February 24, 2015).
24. What is the period for the filing of petition? Nothing contained in
this Rule shall be construed to authorize an action against a public
officer or employee for his ouster from office unless the same be
35
commenced within one (1) year after the cause of such ouster, or
the right of the petitioner to hold such office or position, arose;
nor to authorize an action for damages in accordance with the
provisions of the next preceding section unless the same be
commenced within one (1) year after the entry of the judgment
establishing the petitioner's right to the office in question (Sec. 11,
Rule 66).
27. Which court has jurisdiction? It is the RTC has jurisdiction because
petition for expropriation is an action incapable of pecuniary
estimation regardless of the value of the subject property (Barangay
San Roque vs. Hiers of Pastor, 334 SCRA 127, 134).
36
30. Jurisdiction of judicial foreclosure. Judicial foreclosure is a real
action. Thus, jurisdiction depends on the assessed value of real
property. Thus, if the value of real property is 400K and below, MTC;
above 400K, RTC (RA 11576).
33. What is the effect if the mortgagor failed to pay the sum due
within the period given? The court, upon motion, shall order the
property to be sold in the manner and under the provisions of Rule
39 and other regulations governing sales of real estate under execution
(Sec. 3, Rule 57). There should be motion, but the motion is ex-parte
(Govt. of PI vs. De Las Lajigas, 55 Phil 668, 672).
34. What should the mortgagee do, after the sale of the mortgage
property is made? He should file a motion for confirmation of sale
(Sec. 3. Rule 68). Here the motion requires notice and hearing
(Tiglao vs. Botones, 90 Phil. 275, 278). The confirmation of sale
shall operate to divest the rights in the property of all the parties to
action and vest the rights in the purchaser, subject to the rights of
redemption under the law (Sec. 3, Rule 68). Order of confirmation is
appealable.
38. Forcible entry and unlawful Detainer. What are the two causes
of actions under Rule 70? 1) Forcible entry – an action to recover
possession of a property from the defendant whose occupation
thereof is illegal from the beginning since he acquired possession by
force, intimidation, threat, strategy, or stealth. 2) Unlawful detainer
– an action for recovery of possession from the defendant whose
possession of the property was lawful from the beginning but became
illegal when he continued his possession despite the termination of his
right thereunder (Sarmieta vs. Manalite Homeowners
Association, 632 SCRA 538, 546).
39. What should be alleged in forcible entry? Plaintiff had prior physical
possession. And, that defendant deprived plaintiff of his possession by
means of force, intimidation, threat, strategy or stealth (FITSS).
43. What is the effect if there is failure to alleged facts necessary for
forcible entry and unlawful detainer? The jurisdictional facts must
appear on the face of the complaint. When the complaint fails to aver
facts constitutive of forcible entry or unlawful detainer, as where it
does not state how entry was effected or how and when dispossession
started, the remedy should either be an accion publiciana or accion
reinvindicatoria (Jose vs. Alfuerto, November 26, 2012; Suarez vs.
Emboy, March 12, 2014).
44. PLEASE TAKE NOTE: When the entry is by stealth, the one-year
period to file action should reckoned from the discovery of entry
(Nunez vs. SLTEAS Phoenix Solutions, Inc., 618 SCRA 134,
142). When possession is by tolerance, it becomes illegal upon
demand to vacate by the owner and the possessor by tolerance refuses
to comply with such demand (Piedad vs. Gurieza, June 18, 2014).
The rule on tolerance does not apply in a case where there was forcible
entry at the start (Munoz vs. CA, 214 SCRA 216, 224). Hence, in this
case, unlawful detainer is not the proper remedy (Jose vs. Alfuerto,
November 26, 2012).
39
46. Demand is to “pay unpaid rental or to vacate”. Will this make
out a case of unlawful detainer? No. It should be demand to pay
and vacate. A demand in the alternative to pay the increased rental or
otherwise vacate the land is not a demand that will give rise to an
unlawful detainer case (Penas vs. CA, 233 SCRA 744, 747).
XVI. EXECUTION
40
4. What are the defenses that may be invoked in an action to
revive? Jurisdictional defenses. Prescription. Payment. Other
defenses arising after the finality of judgment NOTE: It may even be
subject to counterclaims arising out of the transactions not connected
with the former controversy (Basilonia vs. Villaruz, August 10,
2015).
10. After receipt of the affidavit of claim, what should the sheriff do?
The officer shall not be bound to keep the property, unless such
judgment obligee, on demand of the officer, files a bond approved by
the court to indemnify the third-party claimant in a sum not less than
41
the value of the property levied on. The officer shall not be liable for
damages for the taking or keeping of the property, to any third-party
claimant if such bond is filed (Section 16, Rule 39).
13. Linden filed a case for collection of sum of money against Meridien.
The judgment was rendered in favor of Linden where Meridien was
required to pay the former Php3M+. The judgment became final and
executory. Writ of execution was thereafter issued. The Sheriff,
however, returned the writ unserved as the officers of Meridien
cannot be found and/or would not accept the writ of execution.
Consequently, Linden moved for the examination of judgement
debtor. It is moving to require the officers of Meridien to appear in
court to be examined on the latter’s properties and income.
Yes. The officers will be examined not on their properties but the
properties of Meridien. Thus, the doctrine separate juridical
personality of Meridien and its officers finds no application in the case
at bar (Linden Suites vs. Meridien Far East Properties
G.R. No. 211969, October 4, 2021, J. Hernando).
42
2. Jurisdiction over the subject matter. It is conferred by law. Thus,
it cannot be subject to waiver, acquiescence, agreement or consent of
the parties (Conjuangco, Jr., vs. Republic, 686 SCRA 472). Conferment of
jurisdiction cannot be presumed. Thus, in order to ascertain whether
a court has jurisdiction or not, the provision of law shall be inquired
(Soller vs. Sandiganbayan, 357 SCRA 677, 683). Jurisdiction over the
subject matter is determined by the allegation in the information. It is
not determined by the evidence presented during trial (Lacson vs. ES,
301 SCRA 298). It is determined by the penalty imposable not the
penalty imposed (People vs. Buissan, 105 SCRA 547). It is determined
by the law at the commencement of the criminal action not the law in
effect at the time of the commission of the offence (People vs. Lagon,
185 SCRA 442; Asistio vs. People, April 20, 2015). Except those case
falling under the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan because it is
determined at the time of the commission of the offense.
10. PLEASE TAKE NOTE: In cases where none of the accused are
occupying positions corresponding to Salary Grade '27' or higher, as
prescribed in the said Republic Act No. 6758, or military and PNP
officer mentioned above, exclusive original jurisdiction thereof shall
44
be vested in the proper regional court, metropolitan trial court,
municipal trial court, and municipal circuit trial court, as the case
may be, pursuant to their respective jurisdictions as provided in Batas
Pambansa Blg. 129, as amended.
11. NOTE FURTHER: Provided, That the Regional Trial Court shall
have exclusive original jurisdiction where the information: (a) does
not allege any damage to the government or any bribery; or (b) alleges
damage to the government or bribery arising from the same or closely
related transactions or acts in an amount not exceeding One million
pesos P1,000,000.00. (RA 10660, amending PD 1606 and RA 8249).
15. What is the effect if the prosecution was not able to prove that
the crime was committed in place where the action was filed? In
a case, the prosecution failed to show that the offense of estafa under
Section 1(b), Art. 315 was committed within the jurisdiction of the
RTC of Makati. Other than the lone allegation in the information,
there is nothing in the prosecution evidence which even mentions that
any of the elements of the offense were committed in Makati. There
being no showing that the offense was committed within Makati, RTC
45
of that City has no jurisdiction over the offense (Trenas vs. People,
664 SCRA 355).
16. What are the exemptions to the rule on venue in criminal cases?
1) Where the offense was committed under the circumstances
enumerated in Art. 2, of the RPC. 2) Where the SC ordered the change
of venue. 3) Where an offense is committed in train, aircraft, or other
public or private vehicle in the course of its trip, the criminal action
need not be instituted in the actual place where the offense was
committed. It may be instituted and tried in the court of any
municipality or territory where such train, aircraft, or vehicle passed
during its trip. The action may also be instituted and tried in the place
of departure and arrival (Sec. 15(b), Rule 110). 4) If the crime is
committed on board a vessel, it may be instituted in the port of entry,
or territory where the vessel passed during the voyage (Sec. 15(c), Rule
110. 5) Where the offense is cognizable by Sandiganbayan; 6) RA
8042, as amended.
18. What is the venue in BP 22? The venue in BP 22 is where the checks
drawn, issued, delivered, dishonored (Yaong vs. People, 704 SCRA 195),
and, deposited (Brodeth vs. People, November 29, 2017).
14. An information for Murder was filed against Samonte for killing
Espinosa. Samonte has been interposing self-defense as a
defense. After the arraignment of Samonte, the Prosecution filed
a Motion for Leave to Admit Amended Information for Murder
against Samonte and Corpus. The Amended information
49
alleged conspiracy between Samonte and Corpus. The latter
being the one who paid Samonte to kill Espinosa. Samonte
objected the admission of the Amended Information on the
ground that the Amended Information prejudice his right as the
Amended Information rendered his defense not anymore
available. Is Samonte correct? SAMONTE IS CORRECT. While
conspiracy is merely a formal amendment, Samonte will be prejudiced
if the amendment will be allowed after his plea. Applying the test, his
defense and corresponding evidence will not be compatible with the
allegation of conspiracy in the new information. Therefore, such
formal amendment after plea is not allowed. (Corpus, Jr. v. Pamular,
G.R. No. 186403, September 5, 2018; People v. Casey, 190 Phil.
748-767 (1981).
3. During the pendency of the criminal action, the running of the period
of prescription of the civil action which cannot be instituted separately
or whose proceeding has been suspended shall be tolled. The
extinction of the penal action does not carry with it extinction of the
civil action (Section 2, Rule 111).
11. NOTE: There is prejudicial question when the civil case is previously
filed. If the criminal case is filed first, there is no pre-judicial question
(Pimentel vs. Pimentel, 630 SCRA 436).
12. Omictin vs. CA, 512 SCRA 70. The petitioner, as the supposed
operations manager of the corporation filed an estafa case against the
private respondent, in behalf of the corporation. Before the filing of
the estafa case, private respondent filed before the SEC a case
51
questioning the legality of petitioner’s appointment as corporate
officer. Private respondent filed a motion to suspend on the ground
of pre-judicial question. THERE IS PRE-JUDICIAL
QUESTION. Under the circumstances, since the alleged offended
party is a corporation, the validity of the demand for the delivery of
the subject vehicles rests upon the authority of the person making
such a demand on the company’s behalf. Thus, if it is found out that
the petitioner’s appointment is invalid, he has no right to demand for
and in behalf of the corporation and the demand to return is likewise
invalid. Hence, a prejudicial question.
14. Is it mandatory that the civil case must first be filed before the
same constitute a prejudicial question? Not necessarily. The strict
sequence of institution of the two actions as provided for by Section
7, Rule 111 of the 2000 Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure is more
directory than mandatory, and must give way to the chief litmus test
of whether the two actions involve prejudicial issues and facts that are
similar or otherwise intimately related so that a resolution in one
concludes the resolution in the other (People vs. Camenforte, G.R.
No. 220916, June 24, 2021).
NOTE:
53
existence of probable cause (People vs. Desmond, G.R. No.
178947, June 26, 2013).
21. What is the remedy if the case is dismissed by the Court based
on lack of probable cause? The proper remedy is appeal. The order
dismissing the case for lack of probable cause is a “final order since it
disposes of the case, terminates the proceedings, and leaves the court
with further nothing to do with respect to the case (Cajipe vs.
People, April 23, 2014).
54
27. The waiver to question the illegality of arrest does not carry with it the
waiver of the inadmissibility of the evidence obtained during illegal
arrest (People vs. Aruta, April 13, 1998).
28. Posting of bail does not constitute waiver of irregularity of arrest (Sec.
26., Rule 114).
29. Honasan II vs. DOJ Panel, April 13, 2004. The power of the
Ombudsman to investigate offenses involving public officers or
employees is not exclusive but is concurrent with other similarly
authorized agencies of the government such as the provincial, city and
state prosecutors has long been settled in several decisions of the
Court. In other words, respondent DOJ Panel is not precluded from
conducting any investigation of cases against public officers involving
violations of penal laws but if the cases fall under the exclusive
jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan, then respondent Ombudsman may,
in the exercise of its primary jurisdiction take over at any stage.
XX. BAIL
56
4. Right to counsel applies during preliminary investigation. The
right to counsel applies in certain pre-trial proceedings that can be
deemed critical stages in the criminal process like in preliminary
investigation. This investigation can be no different from the in-
custody-interrogations by the police, for the suspect who takes part in
a preliminary investigation will be subjected to no less than state’s
processes, oftentimes intimidating and relentless, of pursuing those
who might be liable for criminal prosecution (People vs. Sunga, 339
SCRA 624).
XXIII. ARRIGNMENT
57
his plea of not guilty. No amendment of the complaint or
information is necessary.”
2. May it be made after the prosecution rested its case? Yes. It has
been held that it may also be considered during trial proper or even
after the prosecution has finished presenting it evidence and rested its
case. It is immaterial that the plea bargaining was not made during the
pre-trial stage or that it was made only after the prosecution already
presented several witnesses (Daan vs. Sandiganbayan, 550 SCRA
233).
4. What are the obligations of the Court when the accused pleaded
guilty to a capital offense? A) The Judge shall conduct searching
inquiry into the voluntariness and comprehension of the plea. B)
Require the prosecution to prove his guilt and the precise degree of
his culpability. C) Allow the accused to present evidence in his behalf
(Section 3, Rule 116).
59
XXIV. MOTION TO QUASH
1. What are the grounds for motion to quash? a) That the facts
charged do not constitute an offense, (NOT WAIVABLE); b) That
the court trying the case has no jurisdiction over the offense charged,
(NOT WAIVABLE); c) That the court trying the case has no
jurisdiction over the person of the accused, (WAIVABLE); d) That
the officer who filed the information had no authority to do so,
(WAIVABLE); e) That it does not conform substantially to the
prescribed form, (WAIVABLE); f) That more than one offense is
charged except when a single punishment for various offenses is
prescribed by law (WAIVABLE); g) That the criminal action or
liability has been extinguished, (NOT WAIVABLE); h) That it
contains averments which, if true, would constitute a legal excuse or
justification, (NOT WAIVABLE); and, i) That the accused has been
previously convicted or acquitted of the offense charged, or the case
against him was dismissed or otherwise terminated without his express
consent, (NOT WAIVABLE). (Section 3, Rule 117).
6. What should be the action of the Court? The court shall require
the prosecution to present evidence and the sworn statement of each
proposed witness. The Court shall conduct a hearing in support of the
discharge (Section 17, Rule 119).
10. May the Court motu-propio dismiss the case for lack or
insufficiency of evidence? YES. After the prosecution rests its case,
the court may dismiss the action on the ground of insufficiency of
evidence (1) on its own initiative after giving the prosecution the
opportunity to be heard (Section 23, Rule 119).
62
2. Conditional examination of prosecution witness. - When it
satisfactorily appears that a witness for the prosecution is too sick or
infirm to appear at the trial as directed by the court or has to leave the
Philippines with no definite date of returning, he may forthwith be
conditionally examined before the court where the case is pending.
Such examination, in the presence of the accused, or in his absence
after reasonable notice to attend the examination has been served on
him, shall be conducted in the same manner as an examination at the
trial. Failure or refusal of the accused to attend the examination after
notice shall be considered a waiver. The statement taken may be
admitted in behalf of or against the accused (Section 15, Rule 119).
10. If the judgment is for conviction and the failure of the accused to
appear was without justifiable cause, he shall lose the remedies
available in these rules against the judgment and the court shall order
his arrest. Within fifteen (15) days from promulgation of judgment,
however, the accused may surrender and file a motion for leave of
court to avail of these remedies. He shall state the reasons for his
absence at the scheduled promulgation and if he proves that his
absence was for a justifiable cause, he shall be allowed to avail of said
remedies within fifteen (15) days from notice (Section 6. Rule 120).
NOTE:
The Executive Judges and the authorized Judges shall keep a special
docket book listing the names of Judges to whom the applications are
65
assigned, the details of the applications, and the results of the searches
and seizures made pursuant" to the warrants issued.
NOTE:
XXIX. EVIDENCE
68
11. What is burden proof? Burden of proof is the duty of a party to
present evidence on the facts in issue necessary to establish his or her
claim or defense by the amount of evidence required by law. Burden
of proof never shifts (Section 1, Rule 131). For instance, it is always
the burden of the prosecution in criminal case to prove the accused
beyond reasonable doubt. In civil case, he or she who asserts an
affirmative fact has the burden of proof to establish his or her
allegations (Lavadia vs. Heirs of Luna, G.R. No. 171914, July 23,
2014).
14. What is the effect of presumption? A party in whose favor the legal
presumption exists may rely on and invoke such legal presumption to
establish a fact in issue. One need not introduced evidence to prove
the fact for a presumption is prima facie proof of the fact presumed
(Diesel Construction vs. UPSI Property, 549 SCRA 12).
16. What is the hierarchy of proof? The following are the hierarchy of
proofs: 1) substantial evidence, 2) preponderance of evidence, 3) clear
and convincing evidence, and 4) proof beyond reasonable doubt.
17. What are the situations where the quantum of proof of clear and
convincing evidence is required? 1. To prove justifying
circumstance (People vs. Abina, GR No. 220146, April 18, 2018).
2. To prove bad faith and fraud (Aliling v. Feliciano, G.R. No. 185829,
April 25, 2012, 671 SCRA 186, 217). 3. To pierce the veil of
69
corporate fiction (Manila Hotel vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 120077, October 10,
2000). 4. For the successful invocation of the defense of alibi (People
vs. Bation, GR No. 123160, March 24, 1999). 5. To prove jurisdictional
requirements in the reconstitution of a destroyed or lost title (De La
Paz vs. Republic, GR No. 195726, November 20, 2017). 6. In proving
consented search (Villanueva vs. People, November 17, 2014). 7. In
granting bail in extradition proceedings (Government of Hongkong vs.
Munoz, GR No. 207342, August 17, 2016).
21. There are two (2) civil cases pending between the same parties. One
is being heard by Branch 92. The other one is being heard by Branch
93. Can Branch 92 take judicial notice of the case pending in
Branch 93? ANSWER: A court will take judicial notice of its own
acts and records in the same case (Republic vs. CA, 277 SCRA 633).
22. Suppose the two cases are pending in the same branch, which
is Branch 92, can the Judge take judicial notice of the other case
between the same parties? ANSWER: Courts are not authorized
to take judicial notice of the contents of the records of other cases,
even such cases have been tried or pending in the same court (LBP
vs. Yatco Agricultural Enerprises, Jan. 15, 2014).
23. How can the judge take judicial notice of the case pending in
the same Court? When in the absence of any objection and with the
knowledge of the opposing party, the contents of said other case are
clearly referred to by title and number in a pending action and adopted
and read into the records of the other case; When they are requested
70
to form part of the record of the other case (Tabuena vs. CA, 196
SCRA 650).
25. Admission during pre-trial in criminal case does not result to judicial
admission if it does not comply with Section 2, Rule 118. Section 2,
Rule 118, Pre-trial agreement. - All agreements or admissions made or
entered during the pre-trial conference shall be reduced in writing and
signed by the accused and counsel, otherwise, they cannot be used
against the accused. The agreements covering the matters referred to
in Section 1 of this Rule shall be approved by the court.
26. How about the stipulations of facts during trial? It is not required
that it be signed the lawyer and the accused. The stipulation of acts is
already contained in the TSN. The lawyer is presumed to have prima
facie authority to make relevant admission by pleadings, by oral or
written stipulation which unless withdrawn are conclusive. (People
vs. Hernandez, 206 SCRA 25; Silot vs. Dela Rosa, 543 SCRA 533).
71
issue, it may be exhibited to, examined, or viewed by the court
(Section 1, Rule 130).
33. Links in the Chain of Custody. First, the seizure and marking of
the confiscated drugs recovered from the accused; Second, the
turnover of the illegal drug seized by the apprehending officer to the
investigating officer; Third, the turnover by the investigating officer
of the illegal drug to the forensic chemist for laboratory examination;
Fourth, the turnover and submission of the marked illegal drug by the
forensic chemist to the court (People vs. Kamad, 610 SCRA 295).
39. Exceptions to original document rule. (a) When the original is lost
or destroyed, or cannot be produced in court, without bad faith on
the part of the offeror; (b)When the original is in the custody or under
the control of the party against whom the evidence is offered, and the
latter fails to produce it after reasonable notice, or the original cannot
be obtained by local judicial processes or procedures; (c) When the
original consists of numerous accounts or other documents which
cannot be examined in court without great loss of time and the fact
sought to be established from them is only the general result of the
whole; (d) When the original is a public record in the custody of a
public officer or is recorded in a public office; and (e) When the
original is not closely related to a controlling issue.
40. Parol evidence. - When the terms of an agreement have been reduced
to writing, it is considered as containing all the terms agreed upon and
there can be, as between the parties and their successors in interest,
no evidence of such terms other than the contents of the written
agreement (Sec. 10, Rule 130).
41. Instances where a party may modify, explain or add to the terms
of written agreement. (a) An intrinsic ambiguity, mistake or
imperfection in the written agreement; (b) The failure of the written
agreement to express the true intent and agreement of the parties
thereto; (c) The validity of the written agreement; or (d) The
existence of other terms agreed to by the parties or their successors in
interest after the execution of the written agreement. PLEASE
TAKE NOTE: Before a party may be allowed to introduce parol
evidence, he or she must put the foregoing issues in a verified
pleading (Section 10, Rule 130).
43. What may be testified to? A witness can testify only to those facts
which he or she knows of his or her personal knowledge; that is, which
are derived from his or her own perception (Section 22, Rule 130).
46. Supposed W was called to testify after their marriage had been
annulled, would your answer be the same? My answer would not
be the same. Since the marriage is not anymore existing, the marital
disqualification rule would not apply.
47. May a spouse testify in a trial where the other spouse is a co-
accused? Yes, except as against her husband (People vs. Quitado,
297 SCRA 1).
75
59. Two branches of res inter alios acta. First Branch - The rights of
a party cannot be prejudiced by an act, declaration or omission of
another (Sec. 28, Rule 130). Second Branch - The evidence of
previous conduct or similar acts at one time is not admissible to prove
that one did or did not do the same at another time (Sec. 34, Rule
130).
61. Is this applicable to judicial admission? No. because res inter alios
acta is applicable only to extra-judicial admission, but it does not cover
judicial admission because the other accused can cross-examine.
(Yapyuco vs. Sandiganbayan, 674 SCRA 420).
62. Exception to res inter alios acta: Section 30. Admission by co-
partner or agent. — The act or declaration of a partner or agent
authorized by the party to make a statement concerning the
subject, or within the scope of his or her authority, and during the
existence of the partnership or agency, may be given in evidence
against such party after the partnership or agency is shown by
evidence other than such act or declaration. The same rule applies to
the act or declaration of a joint owner, joint debtor, or other person
jointly interested with the party. (Rule 130).
76
65. Exception to res inter alios acta: Section 32. Admission by
privies. – Where one derives title to property from another, the
latter's act, declaration, or omission, in relation to the property, is
evidence against the former if done while the latter was holding the
title. (Rule 130).
77
statement is offered by the witness in court to prove the truth of the
matters asserted by the statement
78
74. Exception to hearsay. RULE 130, Section 41. – Act or declaration
about pedigree. – The act or declaration of a person deceased or unable
to testify, in respect to the pedigree of another person related to him
or her by birth, adoption, or marriage or, in the absence thereof,
with whose family he or she was so intimately associated as to
be likely to have accurate information concerning his or her
pedigree, may be received in evidence where it occurred before the
controversy, and the relationship between the two persons is shown
by evidence other than such act or declaration. The word "pedigree"
includes relationship, family genealogy, birth, marriage, death, the
dates when and the places where these facts occurred, and the names
of the relatives. It embraces also facts of family history intimately
connected with pedigree.
77. Exception to hearsay. RULE 130, Section 44. –Part of the res
gestae. – Statements made by a person while a startling occurrence is
taking place or immediately prior or subsequent thereto, under the
stress of excitement caused by the occurrence with respect to the
circumstances thereof, may be given in evidence as part of the res
gestae. So, also, statements accompanying an equivocal act material to
the issue, and giving it a legal significance, may be received as part of
the res gestae.
79
and whether it negates any premeditation or purpose to manufacture
testimony (People vs. XXX, G.R. No. 205888, August 22, 2018).
8. May the probate court pass upon the title of the property with
finality? IT MAY. The probate court may pass upon the issue of
ownership where the interested parties are the heirs who have all
appeared in the proceeding and the rights of third parties are not
impaired (Munsayac-De Villa vs. CA, October 24, 2003).
10. What are the claims that must be filed in the settlement of estate
of the deceased? Section 5. Claims which must be filed under the notice. If
not filed, barred; exceptions. — All claims for money against the decedent,
arising from contract, express or implied, whether the same be due,
not due, or contingent, all claims for funeral expenses and expense for
the last sickness of the decedent, and judgment for money against the
decedent, must be filed within the time limited in the notice; otherwise
they are barred forever, except that they may be set forth as
counterclaims in any action that the executor or administrator may
bring against the claimants.
14. What is writ of habeas data? The writ of habeas data is a remedy
available to any person whose right to privacy in life, liberty or security
is violated or threatened by an unlawful act or omission of a public
official or employee, or of a private individual or entity engaged in the
gathering, collecting or storing of data or information regarding the
person, family, home and correspondence of the aggrieved party
(Section 1, Rule on Habeas Data).
15. Ilagan and Lee were live-in-partners. Lee was able to obtain the
digital camera of Ilagan. Lee found a sex video in it. Lee
confronted Ilagan about it but the latter demanded for the return
of his digital camera. Lee refused. Consequently, Ilagan banged
Lee’s head against the wall. Lee filed a criminal case for
violation of RA 9262. Still, Ilagan is demanding for the return of
the digital camera. Lee refused. Ilagan filed a petition for habeas
data against Lee to compel Lee to produce the camera, as well
as the negative and reproductions thereof. Will the petition
prosper? NO. As defined in Section 1 of the Habeas Data Rule, the
writ of habeas data now stands as "a remedy available to any person
whose right to privacy in life, liberty or security is violated or
threatened by an unlawful act or omission of a public official or
employee, or of a private individual or entity engaged in the gathering,
collecting or storing of data or information regarding the person,
family, home, and correspondence of the aggrieved party. Thus, in
order to support a petition for the issuance of such writ, Section 6 of
the Habeas Data Rule essentially requires that the petition sufficiently
alleges, among others, "[t]he manner the right to privacy is violated or
threatened and how it affects the right to life, liberty or security of the
aggrieved party." In other words, the petition must adequately show that there
84
exists a nexus between the right to privacy on the one hand, and the right to life,
liberty or security on the other (Lee vs. Ilagan, October 8, 2014).
20. Where to file? The petition shall be filed with the Supreme Court or
with any of the stations of the Court of Appeals (Section 3, Rule 7,
id).
22. Where do you file the petition for the writ of continuing
mandamus? The petition shall be filed with the Regional Trial Court
exercising jurisdiction over the territory where the actionable neglect
or omission occurred or with the Court of Appeals or the Supreme
Court (Section 2, Rule 8, id).
86
those laws included under the scope of SLAPP (Mercado vs.
Lopena, G.R. No. 230170, June 6, 2018).
24. What are the requirements before a petition for judicial recognition of
foreign divorce to prosper? For a petition for judicial recognition of
foreign divorce to prosper, the party pleading it must prove the fact
of divorce and the national law of the foreign spouse (Republic vs.
Kikuchi, G.R. No. 243646, June 22, 2022, J. Hernando).
GOOD LUCK
AND
AMEN!!!
87