d.M.Host-plant Ranges and Pest Potential
d.M.Host-plant Ranges and Pest Potential
ISSN 1721-8861
Abstract
Data on host-plant ranges are scanty for several thrips species. Published records often refer to collecting sites of adults that have
dispersed from their breeding sites. Thus there are difficulties in knowing the plants that are essential to population maintenance
for most Thysanoptera species. Despite this, different patterns of host exploitation permit a distinction between monophagous,
oligophagous and polyphagous species. Such biological differences can help in the identification of pest species, although some
thrips species are known to exhibit remarkable host shifts, such that they became pests on plants unrelated to their “natural” hosts.
In the present contribution, related to southern areas of Italy, the following species are reported: Neohydatothrips gracilicornis
becoming a pest on Pinaceae, and Drepanothrips reuteri on Quercus, also the polyphagous species Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis, a
pest on Citrus until a few years ago, has been supplanted by Pezothrips kellyanus in the intensive southern citrus orchards (Navel
orange, lemon and bergamot). At present H. haemorrhoidalis is expanding as a pest in forest areas. For each thrips species, data
on field observations and some aspects of their biology on the “new” hosts are provided and discussed.
Key words: host plant range, host shift, feeding behaviour, Drepanothrips reuteri, Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis, Neohydatothrips
gracilicornis.
Results
Discussion
Data from the field surveys are given in table 1. These
data may provide the “rebuilding” of the life history of The results focus on the host-associations of the three
the three thrips species referred to the investigated host thrips species and distinguish between:
plants. 1. The real host plants on which a thrips breeds and
N. gracilicornis breeds on plants of wild Vicia spp., maintains its populations - this knowledge requires
and also other wild Fabaceae, during spring and summer much field work over a long period of time;
(from end of March until July). Adults feed on flower 2. The feeding plant associations, that is those plants
and bud tissues but also on leaves during full summer used by thrips only for feeding activity;
(end of July and August). Larvae develop mainly in the 3. Host-shifts associated with a change in host plant
flowers of the Fabaceae host plants, but no pre-imaginal associations.
specimens were collected from flowers, buds or leaves Field data indicate that Pinus needles cannot be used
of Vicia plants. However, a few prepupal specimens by N. gracilicornis for breeding, because no larvae were
were extracted from soil samples, and this suggests that collected on these plants, but only adults as feeders; lar-
the larvae of this species fall into the soil for pupation vae were not found either on young or on senescent
(the superficial layers of soil). Surveys on Pinus plants leaves. Adults and the feeding damage they cause were
found adult but no larval thrips on the leaves (needles), associated with dried or stressed Pinus and Picea trees.
in all samples taken from September until February. The These observations are in accordance with studies by
available data suggest that N. gracilicornis is univoltine Fennah (1963; 1965) regarding thrips feeding sites and
and overwinters as prepupa and pupa living in litter or the nutritional status of host plant leaves. Characteristic
amongst plant debris in the soil. patterns of thrips can be seen on individual leaves ac-
Table 1. Field surveys referred to three thrips species and their host plants.
Host-plants B r e e d i n g F e e d i n g
Thrips species family and Development Development
Sites Month Sites Month
genus stages stages
Fabaceae flowers eggs, larvae, from March flowers
adults June and July
Neohydatothrips Vicia buds adults to September and leaves
gracilicornis Pinaceae from September
leaves adults
Pinus, Picea to February
young leaves
Vitaceae from March from May
leaves eggs, larvae and tips adults
Drepanothrips Vitis to June to July
or buds of buds
reuteri
Fagaceae young May and from June
eggs, larvae leaves adults
Quercus leaves June to September
eggs, larvae,
Rutaceae from May August and
leaves prepupae and leaves adults
Citrus to July September
Heliothrips pupae, adults
haemorrhoidalis eggs, larvae,
Fagaceae June and from September
leaves prepupae and leaves adults
Quercus July to October
pupae, adults
254
cording to the age and within leaf variation in the BOURNIER A., 1983- Les thrips. Biologie. Importance agrono-
physiological condition of the tissue. Thrips also gather mique.- INRA, Paris, France.
around damaged tissue. These all appear to be responses FENNAH R. G.,1963.- Nutritional factors associated with sea-
to the balance of available nutrients and the level of sonal population increase of cacao thrips, Selenothrips
rubrocinctus (Giard) (Thysanoptera) on cashew, Anacar-
soluble nitrogen, which increases in mature, stressed or dium occidentale.- Bulletin of Entomological Research, 53:
damaged leaves (Kirk, 1997). Pinus trees are not host 681-713.
plants, and in this way N. gracilicornis can be consid- FENNAH R. G., 1965.- The influence of environmental stress
ered as a “tourist” in forest areas. on the cacao tree in predetermining the feeding sites of ca-
D. reuteri breeds on Vitis as well as on Quercus, and cao thrips, Selenothrips rubrocinctus (Giard), on leaves and
can produce damage on both these host plants. This pods.- Bulletin of Entomological Research, 56: 333-349.
thrips is associated with the leaves in the canopy of sev- KIRK W. D. J., 1997.- Feeding, pp. 119-174. In: Thrips as
eral tree species, particularly Quercus species (Palmer, crop pests (LEWIS T., Ed.).- CAB International, Wallingford,
1986). However, there is no evidence from which to de- UK.
LEWIS T., 1997.- Pest thrips in perspective, pp. 1-13. In:
duce the original host associations of this thrips; it may Thrips as crop pests (LEWIS T., Ed.).- CAB International,
have host-shifted from tree leaves onto vines a long Wallingford, UK.
time ago, or it may have evolved as an oligophage on MARULLO R., 1990.- Attacchi da Neohydatothrips gracilicor-
young leaves in the tree canopy including those of vines nis (Williams) (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) su Pinus sp.- Re-
that grow at that level. dia, 73: 223-228.
The biology H. haemorrhoidalis is very different, be- MARULLO R., 2003.- Conoscere i tisanotteri. Guida al ricono-
cause adults of the thrips search for old leaves of Quer- scimento delle specie dannose alle colture agrarie.- Edagri-
cus on which to oviposit. Laying eggs into non- cole, Bologna, Italy.
expanding leaf tissue presumably avoids these eggs be- MARULLO R., 2004a.- Un profilo della tisanotterofauna italia-
na: le interazioni tra specie e piante ospiti e gli effetti sulle
ing crushed as plant cells enlarge and proliferate. In- colture sulla diversità delle popolazioni naturali, pp. 179-
stead, in citrus leaves, cork cells are produced in reac- 184. In: Atti XIX Congresso nazionale Italiano di Entomolo-
tion to eggs of H. haemorrhoidalis (Terry, 1997). gia, Catania 10-15 Giugno 2002.
Further studies might be carried on relating to: MARULLO R., 2004b.- Host-plant range and relationships in
- movements of populations of a species in new areas; the Italian thrips fauna.- Acta Phytopathologica et Ento-
- the reproduction and feeding behaviour of species mologica Hungarica, 39 (1-3): 243-254.
(for example, to explain how H.haemorrhoidalis has MORITZ G., MOUND L. A., MORRIS D. C., GOLDARAZENA A.,
been supplanted by P. kellyanus in the intensive cit- 2004.- Pest thrips of the world: an identification and infor-
rus orchards); mation system using molecular and microscopical methods
(CD-ROM).- Centre for Pest Information and Transfer, Bris-
- the feeding associations and the role of attractive bane, Australia.
substances to better understand the arising of pest MOUND L. A., 1997.- Biological diversity, pp. 197-215. In:
strains inside the natural populations of a species. Thrips as crop pests (LEWIS T., Ed.).- CAB International,
Wallingford, UK.
MOUND L. A., 2005.- Thysanoptera: diversity and interac-
Acknowledgements tions.- Annual Review of Entomology, 50: 247-269.
PALMER J. M., 1986.- Thrips in English oak trees.- Entomolo-
Thanks are due to Dr L.A. Mound from Division of En- gist’s Gazette, 37: 245-252.
tomology, CSIRO (Canberra, Australia), for the critical SCOTT BROWN A. S., SIMMONDS M. S. J., 2006.- Leaf mor-
phology of hosts and nonhosts of the thrips Heliothrips
revision of the manuscript. haemorrhoidalis (Bouchè).- Botanical Journal of the Lin-
nean Society, 152: 109-130.
TERRY L. I., 1997.- Host selection, communication and Re-
References productive behaviour, pp. 65-118. In: Thrips as crop pests
(LEWIS T., Ed.).- CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
BERZOSA J., 1981.- Tisanopteros de la Sierra de Guadarrama.
II. Thripidae Stephens, 1829 (Ins. Thysanoptera).- Graellsia,
37: 65-76. Author’s address: Rita MARULLO ([email protected]),
BERZOSA J., 1994.- Check-list of Thysanoptera (Insecta) of Dipartimento GESAF (Gestione dei Sistemi Agrari e Foresta-
Peninsula Spain. Geographical distribution, host plants, and li), località Feo di Vito, I-89060 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
bibliography.- Zoology (Journal of Pure and Applied Biol-
ogy), 4: 45-91. Received June 28, 2009. Accepted September 15, 2009.
255