1. Prototypes are concepts that closely match the defining characteristics of a particular concept. Different cultures can have different prototypes.
2. Language affects how people perceive the world. Mandarin speakers are more likely to discuss time vertically rather than horizontally.
3. Meaning originates from ideas in the mind according to the Ideational Theory of meaning. However, this theory is abstract and many words do not have clear mental images.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views12 pages
Theory of Meaning
1. Prototypes are concepts that closely match the defining characteristics of a particular concept. Different cultures can have different prototypes.
2. Language affects how people perceive the world. Mandarin speakers are more likely to discuss time vertically rather than horizontally.
3. Meaning originates from ideas in the mind according to the Ideational Theory of meaning. However, this theory is abstract and many words do not have clear mental images.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12
Theories of Meaning
Prototypes
Prototypes Prototypes are concepts that closely match the defining characteristics of a particular concept.
Ex: l. An apple is a prototype for fruit.
2. Rose is a prototype for flower. Prototypes are different for people belonging to different cultures. Ex: In Banginapally area a prototype for fruit could be a mango. Linguistic Relativity
• Language affects the way people perceive and
experience the world around them. • The study showed that Mandarian speakers more likely to talk about the time vertically.
Ex: shang- (up) shang ge yue
(last month) xia- (down) xia ge yue (next month) 1.The Ideational Theory of Meaning • This theory was developed by British empiricist philosopher, John Locke. • This theory explains that the meaning attached to words can be separated from the words themselves. • This means that meaning originates in the mind in the form of ideas. • Words are just sensible signs for the convenience of communication. Contd… • A mechanism for expressing thoughts and thought is viewed as a succession of conscious ideas. • The ideational theory is mentalistic. Thus, the meaning of a word is the mental image or idea of the word or the expression generated in the mind of the speaker or hearer. Criticism on this theory • There is no attempt to define words and expressions using physical associations. Rather, the range of possible meanings ascribed to a given word is that set of available feelings, images ideas concepts, thoughts and inferences that can be produced as a word is heard-(Gluckberg 1975:50). • This ideational theory is perceived to be abstract or imprecise because of dependence on mental images for decoding the meaning of words. Ideas may be too vague to comprehend. Criticism on this theory • It is unthinkable that the mind can create an image of what the senses cannot perceive. • It may also be difficult to use the theory to explain the mental image conjured by sentences. Indeed, sentences derive their meaning more from the word order. There are also many words (especially the abstract ones) that do not have specific physical realities, (happiness, beauty, ugly, hate) let alone mental manifestations. 2. The referential Theory of Meaning • This theory is associated with Ogden and Richards (1923). • According to the referential theory, the meaning of a word is the object it refers to in the external world. That actual object is the referent. • The connection between the words or expressions and their referents is through the process of thought. The words or expressions are just symbols. CONT…
• The object denoted by a word is called its referent.
• Words are like labels. • Examples: • “John” denotes the person John. Problems of Ref. Theory
“Not every word refers to an actual thing.”
Some words don’t refer to anything that exists. “Pegasus” does not denote anything real, because there is no winged horse after all. Also, consider the sentence “I saw nobody.” But to what does “nobody” refer? Criticism of this theory • There are many words without physical objects they refer to. Such words as intelligent, ugly, rich, poor etc, which do not have the concrete qualities of nouns may not have referents. • Again, polysemous words (i.e. words with more than one meaning) may have the additional problem of having more than one referent. • The referential theory may not have a way to explain the meaning of words in the categories of adjectives, adverbs, prepositions and conjunctions. 3.The Usage Theory of Meaning • The German Scholar, Wittgenstein (1953), developed this theory. It has been elaborated upon by J. Firth and M.A. Haliday. • The usage theory is also referred to as the contextual or operational theory of meaning. • According to the theory, the meaning of a word or an expression is determined by the context of its use. • It is the effect created by a linguistic unit within a given context that expresses its full meaning.