Example Precedent Studies
Example Precedent Studies
MVRDV
Marius Hexan
Emily Koo
PRECEDENTS | MIRADOR
84
Ver tical vs Horizontal
With the typical residential Madrid block the resident is offered one of three possible experiences: one could either live in a double loaded corrider block
where you would either be given the choice of having a view of the interior courtyard or that of the public urban landscape, or one could live in a cross
ventilated unit block where you benefit from both the public and private views that such a block can offer.
Now MVRDV took the typical residential block and flipped it onto its end while maintaing the central community space. In this scenario, the community
space maintains its private characteristic as it is situated 40m above ground but now rather than being an inward looking courtyard it a viewing platform
overloking the fabric of the city below. Furthermore, the architect maintains the combination of views that the dweller may have while even diversifying it
over the typical block scenario. With the vertical block, dwellers experience either one side of the building, a cross ventilated unit with a virtual 360 view, and
a handfull of dwelling with an even more enhanced view that includes the elevated community garden.
Proposed residential complex with incorporated community garden 40m above ground
DISTRICT 7
GARDEN
Completed project axonometric DISTRICT 8
DISTRICT 5
DISTRICT 4 DISTRICT 6
DISTRICT 2
DISTRICT 3
DISTRICT 1
Circulation zones stairs Exploded axonometric showing the 9 different building Inter-zone circulation diagram stairs
zones
elevators elevators
As the housing market is slowly recovering from the economic struggles of the past location:
few years, luxury residential developers seem to rely more and more on a single strat- 625 West 57th Street,
egy: to build tall. The upper class is always inclined to pay a little extra to get the best New York City, USA
available option, and what is better than a penthouse with a breathtaking view? From West 58th Street
date completed:
a historical perspective, the urge to build upwards is nothing new. However, before
12th Avenue
11th Avenue
in construction
today this urge had always been restricted to office buildings in business districts. W57
scheduled to open in 2016
As of now, high-rise residential projects are being erected in every large American Helena
city, with one thing to sell to potential buyers: a view. New York City is no exception primary program: West 57th Street
to this trend, and Bjarke Ingels Group’s West 57 project is a good example. With its residential rental building
43 storeys, the residential tower will offer stunning views over the Hudson River, and Hudson River Parking
according to the architects, the form of the building “shifts depending on the view- secondary program:
er’s vantage point”. Even more so, every single unit has a bay window “to amplify the retail
benefits of the generous view”. Whether we agree or not as if view is so important
Hudson
(and whether it is true or not that the view is that spectacular from every apartment), primary structure:
River
West 57 project is definitely part of a movement that transforms a formerly industrial reinforced concrete posts and
Park
slab
neighbourhood into a high-density residential block.
total floor area:
If tall buildings provide nice views, they also have a lot more to offer. An important 985,000ft2 (gross square foot) Site Plan 1:4000
advantage of building upward is the possibility to combine different programs under
a single roof. In the case of West 57, the mixed-use compensates for the distance from maximum building height:
the city center. The building includes common areas such as a terrace and commer- 450ft
cial space. Occupants have everything they need within a single elevator ride. There-
fore living away from downtown becomes possible. People can easily commute to climate zone:
their work with public transit, and they go back home every night to a more peaceful humid continental
neighbourhood. The experience is still similar to living downtown, in terms of leisure min/max temp
and amenities, but there are less traffic jams and more parks. The same idea is at the -3 oC / 30 oC
core of the NYC Sky Farm Project: to create towers for living, away from work but
within convenient distance, and with immediate access to food, recreational activi-
ties and other services. Also, the developer Durst Organization is offering concluded
with the city that 20% of the units will be affordable housing for the first 35 years,
while reducing his taxes, it helps raising the comfort of less fortunate ones.
Union of
the American the European Courtyard filled with veg- Optimized view of the Allows Helena’s view of Optimization of South
skyscraper and courtyard etation to link with the Hudson River the river (the developer of facade
Hudson River Park the building Helena is the
same as W57: The Durst
Courtyard raised to Organization)
second floor to use all the
ground floor for com-
merce anf the first floor
for parking
Due to the pyramid-like shape, they lose the Renders falsely advertise By supposedly optimiz- By allowing only half of In comparison to a
advantage of numerous units at the high levels a visual continuation of ing the view, awkward Helena’s good views to rectangular building of
unique to the skyscraper. the Hudson River Park, non practical spaces are be kept, it creates a huge similar height, W57 looses
the Park being too far created. inequity amongst Hele- much potential space and
The walls of the West facade, being brought down unaligned. na’s tenants, especially in results in a similar amount
to the level of the courtyard, loose of its function between residents of the of south facing apart-
of bringing sunlight normally blocked by higher The designed shape pro- same floor. ments. The large surface
walls and its feeling of inclusion. duces a large surface area area roof is pierced by
of un used roof that could some terraces while a big
is a missed sustainable part is left unused under
opportunity and would the bright sun.
have been a much better
green visual link to the
park.
PRECEDENTS | WEST 57TH STREET | CONCEPT
90
Program & Privacy
4 retail stores
Public North-South Section 1:1000
Being still under construction, the prices for the rent of the apartments
haves not yet been announced. NY Daily News stated that : “Durst thinks
he can push $90 a foot for the top-floor pads” which could total more than
$5,000 a month.
1 lane - 2 directions
Retail 1
Path 2
- Drive through the alley from
the 58th to the 57th.
- Turn right and then imedi-
ately turn left into the public
parking.
Path 1
- Enter throught the accessory
parking doors.
- Wait in line until the ramp is
Vertical Circulation : free to go up one floor. Automotive Circulation
Elevators & Stairs - Park your car.
Path 2
- Enter throught the east side
entrance on the 58th
- Walk to the elevator and go
up 35 floors
- Enter your beautiful apart-
Path 1A ment
- Enter throught the central
entrance on the 58th
- Walk to the elevator and go
up two floors
- Enter the Courtyard and Path 3
enjoy a walk in nature - Enter throught the east side
entrance on the 57th
Path 1B - Take the elevator and go up
- Enter throught store (retail 1), eight floors
shop around - Enter your beautiful apart-
- Walk up two flights of stairs ment
- Enter the Courtyard and
enjoy a walk in nature
Circulation By Foot
PRECEDENTS | WEST 57 STREET | CIRCULATION
TH
94
Structure
Posts and slabs in reinforced concrete
The initial goal was to achieve a LEED Gold certification. Even if in the end the developper decided not to go for a certification, the project is still designed and constructed with the highest environmental standards in mind.
The surface of the building is punctured by green The general idea is to extend the adjacent greenery All units have a large bay-window, allowing for
roof terraces, which helps reduce the urban heat of the Hudson River Park into the West 57th devel- optimal daylight and natural ventilation. This helps
island effect. opment, with the courtyard acting as a park inside reduce the energy consumption.
a high-density residential block.
T VCC B
u il d in g
Ser
vic
eB
u ild
ing
CC T V B uilding
M edia Park
98
S C A L E CO M PA R I S O N
415 m
301 m
234 m
215 m
99
Ad M
m ul VI
in ti P
is -B Ar
tr us ea
at in s
io es
n s
Pr
og
ra
m Ne
Pr ws
od
uc
ti
on
100
Br
oa Ca FU
dc nt N
as ee Ar
ti ns ea
ng
Pa VI
si
rk to
in rs
g ’ L
oo
p
101
Visitors
Staff
VIP
Actors
S p a c e s
L e i s u r e
Staff Loung e F09 Canteen F09
t o
A c c e s s
102
40
10 5 20
20
20 10
10 20
5 5
5
10 20 10 10
103
Kitagata Housing
Kazuyo Sejima (SANAA)
BASHAR ABDALLAH
BERKER EROL
location:
Kitagata Apartment Housing Project is a social housing master- Giku, Kitagata, Japan
plan in Gifu Prefecture, Japan, commissioned to Japanese archi-
tect Arata Isozaki who coordinated four women architects to exe- date completed:
1994 - 2000
cute the project. This case study focuses on the building which is
developed by SANAA under the design lead of Kazuyo Sejima.
primary program:
apartment housing
Sejima’s approach to the social housing is remarkable in the way
it extends beyond the banal and omits repetitive typology of secondary program:
apartment housing. The building is a composite of modular units urban renovation
piled on top of each other as a randomized mosaic. In addition to
providing natural cross ventilation, the openings in this mosaic of primary structure:
modular blocks give glimpses of the landscape behind. concrete slabs
The building is raised on pilotis to make space for the parking total floor area:
6290 m2
level. Its footprint is a hook which accommodates an intimate
courtyard used as a service space for leisure and playground for
maximum building height:
children in the housing complex. The circulation is kept simple
with exterior corridors connecting every apartment on different
floors and each corridor to the ground level. climate zone:
humid subtropical climate
min/max temp Kitagata Housing by SANAA
8 oC / 31 oC
D B T J B J B B J D T
D T
D B B J T T B B J T J B B
D J B B T J B B T
D D
D
B B J J D B B T
T B D J J B B J B B D T T D
D T
D J B B T J T B B J B B D T B B J T D T B B J
D D
T B B B B D J T B B
J D B T J D D T J J T B B
D J B T T D B B J J D B B T B B T J J B T
D D
T B J B B D B J T J B T D J B B
D D T D J B T
B B J J B B T
T B B D J J D T B B T D D D J B B T
T D B B J
T D J B B D T B B J J B D T T B J
Modular configuration of the units | D : Dining kitchen , T : Terrace , B : Bedroom , J : Traditional Japanese Room
109
Configuration diagram of units.
The type of unit corresponds to a specific color.
110
Structural diagram
HVAC shafts
Facility diagram
112
Sun path diagram in Gifu Daylight analysis
113
Interior circulation diagram Interior of a typical unit
114
Ventilation diagram Diagram showing the cross-ventilation throughout the building
115
Diagram of perforations
116
Exterior circulation diagram
117
M
W
O
C
D RO
BE
O OM
DR
BE
O M
RO
I NG
LIV
H EN
C
I TC
IR
C
K
U
LA
TI
O
N
CE
CO
A
RR
RR
ID
TE
O
R
118
location:
Lille, France
date completed:
2013
primary program:
housing
secondary program:
offices & retail
primary structure:
concrete slabs and walls
climate zone:
warm and temperate
min/max temp
2 oC / 24 oC
L’Arboretum
Coldefy & Associés Architectes Urbanistes
Charles-Olivier Rocray
Kamilla Jolicoeur
119
Office Tower
The “Arboretum” in Lille is the fruit of a
competition orgnanized by the city to
revitalize the Porte de Valenciennes, a
disconnected neighborhood, cut off
from the city by railways, highways,
and a train station. With the whole
area, previously occupied by old social
housing units, being built anew, one
of the main goal of the project was to
Housing Towers
create a coherent neighborhood that
would connect the many part of the
city surrounding it. With that in mind,
the architects (CAAU) decided the
Arboretum should have 3 main pro-
grams: housing units, retails, and offic-
es - with a special care paid to the pres-
Retail Ground Floor ervation (and cohabitation) of nature.
Programmatic Axonometric
bedroom 1 bedroom 4
washroom
cellar
washroom
walk-in
entrance
kitchen
bedroom 3 bedroom 2
living room
balcony 2
Bottom Floor Plan Typical Housing Unit Top Floor Plan Typical Housing Unit
elevator
0 2 5
1 3
balcony
Ground Floor
Vertical Circulation
All the facades of the buildings are based on a single module. creating unity inbe-
tween the different parts and functions of the building. Another unifying charac-
teristic of the Arboretum is the double exterior facade on the south side. It allows
for balconies in the gap space and outside space protected from the boulevard. It
smoothes the inner facade composed of single and double height appartments.
climate zone:
cool and temperate cllimate
min/max temp
3 oC / 10 oC
10°
20°
30°
June 21st
40°
50°
60°
70°
80°
W E
December 21st
Access to the apartments is on the north, inside the block, via ex-
ternal staircases with a central access gallery on the first floor and
an open access gallery on the top level.
Columns
4th Floor
3th Floor
Residential
2th Floor
1th Floor
Exterior Cirulation
Interior Circulation
DI DL
DL
I
DI DL
PRECEDENTS | NEXUS WORLD HOUSING | UNITS D L
136
Ivry-Sur-Seine Housing
Jean Renaudie & Renée Gailhoustet
Véronique Demers
Hagop Sarian
The Ivry-sur-Seine housing building was the result of the col- location:
labroation between Jean Renaudie and Renee Gailhoustet. This Paris, France
brutalist conctruction is conglomeration of 8 buildings that
spread in the downtown area of Ivry-sur-seine. In an attempt date completed:
1969-75
to reinvigorate the city, the two architects tried to redifine the
idea of housing in the city. With its massive scale, the Ivry com-
primary program:
plexe organically integrates with the urban fabric, bridging over residences
streets and providing multiple uses over multiple levels. It blurs
the boundary between private and public areas and while giving secondary program:
each appartment a patch of land. offices and stores
Despite the building’s massive size, it appears very welcoming primary structure:
from the street. Each residential unit has its own terrace where cast-in place concrete
the vegetation florishes. Seperating the open spaces into triangu-
lar terraces, Gailhoustet and Renaudie were concerned with the total floor area:
2000 units
residents of their creation. Influenced by the modernist philoso-
Avg. Floor area per unit = 70m2
phies of “Team X”, they came up with a design that opened a new
15000 m2 Commercial
horizon for the developement of social housing. As the architects 10000 m2 Offices
prefered the differenciation of the spaces to a more multifunc-
tional space, they created a housing complex that is still relevant maximum building height:
in our modern age. 27 m
Units specifications
1 bedroom x 6 units 35m2
2 bedrooms x 2 units 50m2
3 bedrooms x 9 units 70m2
4 bedrooms x 1 unit 90m2
10m
10m
1:100
2 Bedroom
1 Storey Unit
Interior : 81 m2
Exterior : 150 m2
3 Bedroom
2 Storey Unit
Interior : 162 m2
Exterior : 154 m2
3 Bedroom
2 Storey Unit
Interior : 162 m2
Exterior : 154 m2
PRECEDENTS | IVRY-SUR-SEINE HOUSING | DETAILED UNITS NYC SKY CONDO / URBAN FARM
140
Triangular Grid
Past usage of Grids
NYC SKY CONDO / URBAN FARM PRECEDENTS | IVRY-SUR-SEINE HOUSING | TRIANGULAR GRID
141
Wind Analysis
Even though the terraces are on the South-West facade are not
significally larger than on the other ones, the irregular geometry of
the building might end up mitigating the undesirable effects of the
wind.
Dominant wind
PRECEDENTS | IVRY-SUR-SEINE HOUSING | WIND ANALYSIS NYC SKY CONDO / URBAN FARM
142
Sun Analysis
South illuminance
NYC SKY CONDO / URBAN FARM PRECEDENTS | IVRY-SUR-SEINE HOUSING | SUN ANALYSIS
143
Vertical Circulation Circulation path
The public programs, such offices, retail and community centers are
closer to the ground and the residences rest above.
Public space
Each unit can therefore benefit with more usable area for interiors and
terraces.
5m
IEW
KEV Lake
LA
Mountain
OC
EA
NV
IEW
25m
The concept behind the massing design of the Vanke Center relies on its intricate
relationship with the landscape. Its is thought as to maximize the views towards the
outside (3) and offer the widest sight possible.
300 PURCHASED
ELECTRICITY NC VERSION 2 PLATINUM
250
SS: SITES 13/14
200 WE: WATER 5/5
150
EA: ENERGY 16/17
MR: MATERIALS 5/13
100
EQ: INDOORS 13/15
50 ID: INNOVATION 5/5
0 POINTS/POINTS POSSIBLE
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Solar panels, water conservation cycles, energy collection methods and other di-
verse sustainable strategies have allowed the building to obtain Platinum LEED cer-
tification, first major “green project” in China. (6) Landscape and Volumes Organization
OFFICES
APARTMENTS
HOTEL
As a result of the uncertain economic context during the construction, the building was designed with inherent flexibility. Even today, while the structure
is essentially complete, the client remains unsure as to the precise allocation of space. Three potential accommodation types (7), however, have been
identified. A hotel occupies space at the north-eastern end of the site, where the elevated figure descends to the ground, with a condominium at the
centre of the principal range. An element called SOHO comprises larger-scale live-work units and Vanke’s own offices occupy the two-pronged range at
the plan’s south-western extreme. A lower-level located underneath the green public landscape (11) combines a spa, parking spaces, a conference center
and an indoor swimming pool. (9) Open Levels as Buffers for Program Zones
possibility for
programmatic boundary
25m
SWIMMING POOL + SPA PARKING CONFERENCE CENTER
Circulation and Privacy Linking the programmatic elements together is ‘a semi-public path’ that
threads its way up through the building’s linear plan (12), providing a
“Semi-Public Monolithic Path” VANKE
LENS OPEN TO BELOW (A) LIGHT FROM THE SIDE (B) TUNNEL OF MORPHING TYPOLOGIES (C) LENS OPEN TO ABOVE (D)
VANKE
VANKE CAFE
CENTER
semi-public path
LENS OPEN TO BELOW (A) LIGHT FROM THE SIDE (B) TUNNEL OF MORPHING TYPOLOGIES (C) LENS OPEN TO ABOVE (D)
10m
FIRST FLOOR THIRD FLOOR FOURTH FLOOR FIFTH FLOOR SIXTH FLOOR
THIRD FLOOR
FIRST FLOOR
FOURTH FLOOR
tension
compression
(17) “Cable-Stay” System
(19) Detailed Cross Section showing Program Node and Apparent Frame
10m
(18) Concrete Frame and Visible Structure
Crystal Lee
Eric Seo
Nancy Serag-Eldin
location:
Marseille, France
date completed:
1947-1952
primary program:
housing
secondary program:
retail shops, commercial offices, educational facilities, public spaces
primary structure:
column based structure, reinforced concrete
béton brut (rough-cast concrete)
pilotis – reinforced concrete stilts
min/max temp
4°C / 29°C
The Housing Unit was dubbed the “vertical garden city”, which makes it a good case study for our design
project. It was designed to be a self-sufficient unit, as if the building was a city within itself.
It is a rectangular tower block, approximately 150 meters long by 30 meters wide and nearly 60 meters tall.
It was aligned north-south so that the length of the building could enjoy unobstructed views of the Med-
iterranean Sea on the west side and the cityscape of Marseilles on the east. It offers a mixed-use program,
the primary component of which is housing; the other services being retail shops, commercial offices, edu-
cational facilities, social gathering spaces, and much more, for a total of 26 separate services.
It is comprised of 12 residential floors for a total of 337 apartments that can house 1600 people. There are
several apartment types. The most popular type is the 2-story duplex which Le Corbusier called “the du-
al-aspect, E-type apartment”. Each of these units has a mezzanine level as well as a double height space. You
could either “enter from the level below and find the main bedroom on a balcony over the living room… or
its opposite variant with the double-height living room/bedroom and small upstairs entrance/dining room/
kitchen.”
These duplexes are stacked in a staggered pattern with their adjacent apartments such that every two
apartments sandwiches the corridor between them on the middle level. Hence the corridors are only found
on every third floor, and run through the center of the floor level for the length of the building. These corri-
dors acted as the “streets in the air” between neighbors for this vertical city. Every apartment stretched from
one side of the building to the other, allowing for access to nature and beautiful views from both sides.
Figure 3: Unite d’Habitation is located south of Marseille, with a view of the Mediterranean
Sea to the west.
There are 2 communal floors at half height, which provide the residents with places to interact with one an-
other. This includes a two-story shopping area that extends along the length of the building, a social gath-
ering place, laundry facilities, commercial and retail services such as shops, medical offices, a children’s art
school, a hotel, an architectural bookshop, catering, and a restaurant called “Le Ventre de l’architecte” (The
Architect’s Belly).
The roof also serves an important social function. It was designed to be a terrace and a vital space for com-
munity activities. There is a covered gymnasium, a 300-meter running track, an outdoor theatre, a swim-
ming pool, a children’s play area, and a spectacular view of the Mediterranean Sea and the city of Marseille.
The housing block in Marseille was a tremendous success when it opened, and proved very influential in
housing design, particularly in the Brutalist architectural style. It remains popular to this day. Its current
residents are predominantly upper middle-class professionals.
Due to its popularity, Le Corbusier designed four other similar housing blocks throughout Europe. “To dis-
tinguish the buildings, this original building in Marseille, France, is now called the Radiant City, and known
in French as Cité Radieuse”. The other Unités were built in Nantes-Rezé called Unité d’Habitation of Nantes-
Rezé in 1955, Berlin-Westend in 1957, Briey in 1963, and Firminy in 1965.
It is important to understand Le Corbusier’s vision and design concept, in order to appreciate the overall
building design as well as the finer details.
Figure 4: Unite d’Habitation address: 280 Boulevard Michelet, 13008 Marseille, France
Figure 9: The Housing Unit is shaped like an ocean liner, long and narrow. Figure 10: The massive 8-meter tall pilotis imitate the shape of a ship’s hull
PRECEDENTS | UNITE D’HABITATION | CONCEPT
156
PROGRAM
PROGRAM:
Swimming Pool
Children’s Play Area
SURROUNDED BY GREEN
Gymnasium
Nursery School
Solarium
Open Air Theater
Running Track
INDIVIDUAL UNITS
PROGRAM:
Residential Units
PARKING
PROGRAM:
Hallway
157
CIRCULATION
Upper 11 33
22
44 66
55 77
1 3
2
Interlocking volumes with a central internal street
Lower
4 6
5 7
1. Children’s bedroom
1. Children’s bedroom 5.
5. Kitchen
Kitchen
2.
2. Bathroom
Bathroom 6.
6. Living
Living
Cross-section of the building
3.
3. Parent’s
Parent’s bedroom
bedroom 7.
7. Balcony
Balcony
4. Interior street
4. Interior street
In Unité d’Habitation, there is ‘free volume’, where two story apartments interlock, so entrance and elevator stops are only at
every 3rd level. This reduces the circulation space while maximizing the residential space.
1 1. Children’s bedroom
3 5. Kitchen
2
2. Bathroom 6. Living
3. Parent’s bedroom 7. Balcony
4. Interior street
4 6
5 7
PRECEDENTS | Unité d’Habitation | UNIT PLANS & CIRCULATION
158
APARTMENT TYPES
In Unité d’Habitation, there are 337 apartments of 23 different types. 213 of them are standard types. There are 20 larger apartments and 79
small ones of which 26 are not split level.
BATH
2.93
BATH BALCONY BATH
LIVING CIRCULATION
BALCONY LIVING 2.93 TYPE 2 - Single unit 7.25 2.93
23.41
TYPE 1 - Single
3.63unit2 11.7BATH CIRCULATION area: 33.6m2 LIVING
BALCONY
Total BATH BATH
CIRCULATION BATHKITCHEN
BALCONY Total area:LIVING
18.25m 2.93 7.25 23.41 2.93 2.93 2.93
3.63 11.7 BATH BATH BATH BATH 5.85
CIRCULATION BALCONY LIVING
BALCONYBALCONY LIVING
CIRCULATION
LIVING KITCHEN CIRCULATION
CIRCULATION
BALCONY LIVING
BALCONY BALCONY LIVING2.93
LIVING 2.93 2.93 2.93
7.25 7.2523.41
7.25 23.41 23.41
3.63 11.7 3.63
3.63 11.7 11.7BATHCIRCULATION
CIRCULATION CIRCULATION BALCONY LIVING 5.85
CIRCULATION
BALCONY LIVING 2.93 23.41 KITCHEN KITCHEN
KITCHEN
7.25
3.63 11.7 CIRCULATION 5.85 5.85 5.85
KITCHEN
5.85
BATH
BATH 2.93 ROOM BAL
TYPE 3 - Family unit (3- 4 people) TYPE 4 - Large family unit (6 - 8 people)
7.32 BATH 14.63 3
Total area: 106.7m2 Total area: 210m2
BATH
BED 2.93 ROOM BALCONY
7.32
20.48 HALL BATH BATH BATH
14.63 3.62
BED BATH BATH BATH 2.93 2.93
2.93ROOM ROOM ROOM
BALCONY
ROOM BAL
BAL
BALCONY
7.32 7.32 7.32 BATH BATH 14.63 3
20.48 HALL 14.63 3.62
14.63 14.63 3.62 3.
BED BATH 2.93 2.93
ROOM
ROOM BALCONY
BALCONY
BED BED
7.32 BATH BATH 3.62
20.48 20.48 20.48 BATH HALL HALL HALL 14.63
14.63
ROOM
3.62
BAL
BALCONY BEDROOM 2.93 2.93 2.93
ROOM ROOMBALCONY
ROOM BAL
BALCONY
HALL BATHBATH BATH 14.63 3
3.62 20.48
14.63
BATH BALCONY BED HALL BATH14.63 3.62
14.63 14.63 3.62 3.
BALCONY ROOM 2.93 7.25 32.19 2.932.93 ROOM
ROOM
2.93 2.93 BALCONY
BALCONY
HALL BATHBATH 14.63
BATH 14.63
BATH 3.62
3.62
3.62 14.63 BATH BATH BATH BALCONY BED
BALCONY
ROOM ROOM BATH 2.932.93 2.93ROOM
2.93 ROOMBALCONY
ROOM BAL
BALCONY
ALCONY BALCONY
BALCONY ROOM ROOM
2.93 2.93 2.93 HALL HALL 7.25 32.19
3.62 3.62
3.62 14.63
3.62 BATH HALL
14.63
14.63 14.63 BATH BALCONY BALCONY BED
BALCONY BED BED 7.32 BATH BATH
14.63 3.62
14.63 14.63 3
3.62 3.
BALCONY ROOM 2.93 BATH 2.93 ROOM
2.93
ROOM BALCONY
BALCONY
BALCONY HALL2.93 7.25 32.19
7.25 7.25 32.19 32.19 14.63 3.62
3.62
3.62 14.63 BATH BALCONY BED 7.32 BATH 14.63 3.62
ALCONY ROOM
BALCONY
BALCONY ROOMROOM 2.93 7.25 32.19 BATH BATH BATH 2.93 ROOM ROOMBALCONY
ROOM BAL
BALCONY
3.62 3.62 14.63
3.62 14.63BATH
14.63 BATH BATH 7.32 7.32 7.32 BATH BATH BATH
14.63 3.62
14.63 14.63 3.62 3.
BALCONY ROOM BATH 2.93 ROOM BALCONY
2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93
3.62 14.63 BATH 7.32 BATH 14.63 3.62
2.93 KITCHEN 2.93
5.85
KITCHEN BALCONY LIVING
KITCHEN
5.85 7.25 23.415.85
BALCONY KITCHEN
LIVING BALCONY LIVING KITCHEN KITCHENKITCHEN
CIRCULATION
7.25 23.415.85 7.25 23.41 5.85 5.85 5.85
BALCONY LIVING
BALCONY
BALCONY KITCHEN
LIVINGLIVING
BALCONY LIVING KITCHEN KITCHEN
KITCHEN
CIRCULATION CIRCULATION
7.25 23.41
7.25 7.25 23.41 23.41 5.85
7.25 23.41 5.85 5.85 5.85
KITCHEN BALCONY LIVING
ALCONY LIVING
BALCONY
BALCONY LIVINGLIVING
CIRCULATION CIRCULATION CIRCULATION
CIRCULATION
7.25 23.41
7.25 23.41
7.25 7.25 23.41 23.415.85
BALCONY LIVING CIRCULATION
CIRCULATION CIRCULATION
CIRCULATION
7.25 23.41
CIRCULATION
BATH BATH
CIR CIR
BALCONY BALCONY
LIVING LIVING
BATH
Circulation paths within apartment units
BATH BATH CIR
BALCONY BALCONYLIVING LIVING
BALCONY LIVING BATH BATH
KITCHEN KITCHEN
Unit 1 Unit 2
CIR CIR
BATH BATH CIR
BALCONYBALCONYLIVING LIVING KITCHEN
CIR
BALCONY LIVING
CIR BATH BALCONY LIVING CIR
BATH
KITCHENKITCHEN
BALCONYBALCONY LIVING LIVING CIR
BATH
CIR
KITCHEN
BALCONY LIVING
CIR
BATH BATH
BATH BATH ROOM ROOM BALCONY BALCONY
BALCONY BALCONY
LIVING LIVING COR COR BALCONY BALCONY
LIVING LIVING COR COR
KITCHEN KITCHEN
CIR CIR
161
Daylighting
Fenestration Design
The structural system used for this building
is a key factor in the amount of daylight
that is able to shine through the building.
By using a column-based structure, instead
of load-bearing walls, Le Corbusier was able
to design for large windows, and therefore
light is able to fully penetrate each floor.
Le Corbusier also played with the tempo- Figure 12: the gallery promenade, the shopping level’s “interior Figure 13: The interior view of apartment 50, showing the double hieght
ral quality of light. “He was interested in streets” fully glazed wall
having a space with perspectives that are
internally dramatic and play with light at
different times of day — a fantastic contrast
with the perpetual twilight of the corridors.”
According to some visitors and residents,
the corridors (i.e. the “interior streets”) were
the only areas in the building that were a
bit dark because they were trapped in the
center of the building between apartments.
However, light sources are provided above Figure 11: Cross-section through the dual-aspect E-type apartments
every front door. with through views allow light to penetrate from both ends, and air
to circulate
Although this building has been applauded as an example of passive energy control, Another way in which Le Corbusier strived to make this project economically feasible,
it has however, a couple of flaws. First, this building’s orientation was mainly dictated was to design spaces that were extremely space-efficient “by adopting the minimal
by the Mediterranean view to the west, and not by the solar path of the sun. Hence, dwelling space of 14m2 per occupant proposed at the 1930 Brussels International
the tower block is oriented north-south, so that the length of the west façade could Congress of Modern Architecture (CIAM)”. Le Corbusier proved that it was indeed
face the sea. This leaves it especially vulnerable to the setting sun, which is partic- possible to live comfortably in this minimal space and once again pointed to the
ularly uncomfortable in summer and the effect of its brises-soleils will be rendered example of luxury liner staterooms as proof.
useless.
Le Corbusier intended to have at least two hours of sunshine per day (even on the
shortest day of the year) enter every dwelling, as per the International Congress of Figure 15: Rough-cast concrete with the wood-
Modern Architecture (CIAM) 1951 Charter of Athens. However, he was not successful grain texture of the formwork
because “the west facing elevation allows two hours of solar penetration from 3pm
to 5pm in the summer months but only about 20 minutes of direct sun per day in the
winter months. By contrast, south elevation works successfully, allowing up to eight
hours of sunlight penetration in the winter months, while also achieving complete
shading from April through to September. In other words, if the building was rotated
through 90 degrees the brises-soleils would work much more effectively.”
The second flaw is that Le Corbusier believed the brise-soleil should be fixed, based
on “based on precise data: a) the course of the sun on every day of the year; move-
able brises soleils may be the only way to achieve ‘at least two hours of sunlight
per day at the winter solstice’ (Charter of Athens 1951) - and protection from direct
sunlight during the warmer months: the sun is in the same position in the sky on the
two equinoxes (i.e. solar geometry is symmetrical on either side of the solstices) but
the temperature is, in most places, different. The sun may be desirable at the winter
solstice, but be intolerable at the summer solstice. Therefore fixed brises-soleils are
not entirely appropriate.”
Figure 14: Le Corbusier’s hand sketches of the summer and winter solar
However, the apartments experienced good ventilation by being open to the air on paths and the vertical and horizontal fins of the sunbreakers (brise-soleils)
both sides (east and west) thus achieving good air flow. Instead of installing an air
conditioning system, the housing block used natural ventilation to cool the building.
Since all windows opened to the exterior, by opening several windows, breezes could
flow throughout the apartment. Figure 16: A close up of the brise-soleil
These central ideas will form the basis of our design for the NYC
Sky Farm.
50m
Use this font and size for image captions and figure captions
5m
5m
1m
5m
5m
5m
5m
5m
5m 5m 5m
The Mirador building, by MVRDV and Blanca Lleo, is a housing unit located in location:
the rapidly developing and industrialized suburb of Hortaleza, near Madrid. Madrid, Spain
There exists a large difference in context between the agglomerated urban
environment of the highline, and the Mirador, placed remotely in the middle of date completed:
other residential units, surrounded by highways.
2001-2005
There are however, key parallels to be made between the two sites. First, the
highline, in its elevation from the ground, establishes itself as a point of visual primary program:
interest. The idea of gaze on the street is further developed as one stands on residential
the highline, where a series of views of the city are deliberately framed.
Similarly, the Mirador building aims to create a contrast in relation to its sur- secondary program:
roundings. The design decision was to negate the horizontal, flat development sky plaza
of adjacent buildings, and rotate the Mirador to a considerable height of 60m
above the ground. The architects took the typology of surrounding buildings, primary structure:
which all have large inner courtyards, and expressed these elements vertically steel truss roof system
within the Mirador. The result is an elevated platform, 14 stories above ground.
As the name suggests, the building is designed in relation to the surrounding
landscape and opportunities for observing it. The elevated platform becomes a
total floor area:
key point in this respect. 18300 m2 at 22 floors
Both the Mirador and the highline provide alternate levels and manners of cir- maximum building height:
culation, trying to reinvent the opportunities available for community gather- 40 m
ing.The Mirador makes a bold statement in its exposed, red circulation corridor
that traverse the building in what creates a network of streets, alleyways, a climate zone:
microcosm of the city within a building. warm, temperate, & subtropical
Development of a project on the highline can be informed by the methods of min/max temp
MVRDV and Lleo in their fragmentation and re-organization of space into verti-
-10.1 oC / 40.6 oC
cal neighbourhoods, as well as their special treatment of circulation corridors.
184
Site Plan
Context Mapping
0 25 50 125 250
185
Madrid
Mountains
Madrid
Mountains
Mountains
Mountains
0 50 100 250 500
0 50 100 250 500
Residential Blocks
Circulation
Meeting Spaces
Axonometric Study
The idea of the Vertical Alleyway is an important marker and boundary in the
Mirador Project. They become circulation tools as well as public connectors
from the private residential units to the outdoor meeting spaces. The Cir-
culation of the Mirador is entirely open to the outdoor elements and create
frames and view points to the Madrid landscape.
1:1000
187
Photographic Study of Meeting Spaces
Port(u*o)s “MVRDV Edificio Mirador Madrid.“ Online image. Web 15 Jan. 2015. http:// Hart, Robert “Mirador.” Online image. Divisare, July 30 2008. 13 Jan 2015. http://divis- Lleò Blanca. “ http://divisare.com/projects/69883-MVRDV-Mirador/images/943772
www.kientruc.eu/clanky/mirador are.com/projects/69883-MVRDV-Mirador/images/943772
The rooftop circulation connecting the uppermost apartments as well as the east The view of the Vertical Courtyard give massive views of the city to its West and the
The enclosure of the ‘Meeting Spaces’ create areas for gathering as well as public and west apartments mountains to its East
indoor spaces that are open to the outside air.
0 5 10 25
0 5 10 25
0 5 10 25
Each residential block represents a size and type of apartment space. Each
housing units become their own building and are stacked on top of each
other with the sky-plaza / courtyard at its center. Each block fits with different
lifestyles and make up the 165 apartment complex.
1:500
1:1000
PASANTE
QUADRADA
PASANTE EN L
TRIPLEX
DUPLEX
0 5 10 25
Through these Detailed Sections and Plans we can have a better understand-
ing as well as make assumptions to the structure and proportional sizes of
the building and its individual units.
0 5 10 25
0 5 10 25
June
5
19
Daylighting W E
Sun Path Diagram
12
Due to its large height and lower site context, Mirador sees most of the sun
throughout the year. Because of its location, significantly away from other
surrounding complexes, the Mirador building is able to exist free of its neigh-
bour shadows. With its access to constant light, the outdoor corridors and
openings create time lapsed atmospheres according to the position of the
sun. 17
8 December
12
S 0 25 50 125 250
Illera “MVRDV 1mar05 (26).” Online image. Web 15 Jan. 2015. https://www.flickr. Illera “MVRDV 1mar05 (23).” Online image. Web 15 Jan. 2015. https://www.flickr. Javier “Edificio Mirador MVRDV y B. LLeó 2929.” Online image. Web 15 Jan. 2015.
com/photos/75467601@N00/2337520798 com/photos/illera/2337520736/sizes/z/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/javier1949/7211771014
The steel truss stair system on the roof allows for the outdoor sun to beam through The Vertical Circulation Hallways allow light to penetrate the hallways of private Even through the exterior we are able to see the multiple levels and entrances
its system and creates impromptu spotlights. residential homes. daylight can penetrate through.
SOUTH
0 5 10 m
Cultural gallery
Communication area
Event hall
0 5 10 m
Velazquez’s, Linda. “The greenroof & greenwall projects database”. ACROS Fukuoka Prefectural International
Hall. August 2012. <http://www.greenroofs.com/projects/pview.php?id=476>
International Green Roof Association. “Global Networking for Green Roofs”. 2015. <www.igra-world.com>.
Fichner-Rathus, Lois. Understanding Art. 10th Edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Boston: 2010.
Lopez, Fernando. Emilio Ambasz. Inventions: architecture and design. Museo Nacional Centro de Arte. Madrid:
2012. <http://www.museoreinasofia.es/sites/default/files/notas-de-prensa/2011-003-dossier-en.pdf>.
Plants
Soil
207
N
330 o
340 o
350 o 10 o
20 o
30 o
Sou Fujimoto, Nicolas Laisné Associés and Oxo Architects 320 o Le Lez River 40 o
310 o 50 o
280 o 80 o
W E
260 o 100 o
Summer
250 o 110 o
Interuniversity Library of
Montpellier
240 o 120 o
230 o 130 o
Winter
140 o
210 o 150 o
the 21st Century” competition. Selected by the City of Montpellier, Montpellier, France 200 o
190 o 170 o
160 o
the “White Tree” is mainly inspired by the city’s traditions for S 100m
outdoor life. In addition, it emulates the efficient properties of a DATE COMPLETED: Site Plan & Sunpath Diagram
SITE PLAN | MONTPELLIER
Unbuilt project
plant, giving this unique project its name. The building embodies Pic Saint Loupup
This housing tower is strategically located within this historical PIC SAINT-LOUP
La Mer
SECONDARY PROGRAM:
city of Montpellier, situated between the old and the new Restaurant, art gallery, offices
districts. The concept of seamless integration between the
interior and exterior is found throughout the building: each PRIMARY STRUCTURE:
living quarter is provided with its own terrace, allowing indoor Concrete core Marianne Port
VIEWS Text
This project touches upon a multitude of ideas and approaches MIN/MAX TEMP:
to sustainability that offer a basis upon which to expand in the 3oC / 30oC
Sky Farm Project. Although the ideas of sustainability proposed
by the architects remain somewhat unresolved, this mixed-use
MARIANNE PORT
tower of similar scale and program brought attention to many
notions (use of local resources, efficiency, waste reduction) that
will direct and inspire our future design.
209
MICRO UNIT | 1:100
210
INDOOR/OUTDOOR LIVING
EXTENDING LANDSCAPE
RIVER VIEW
RESTAURANT | 1:300
211
LEAF-LIKE BALCONIES:
balcony privacy
diagram
show inside-->outside
sun sections
2
Reuse
1 sun sections
Recuperate
212