Key Insight 2 Artifact 1 - Rhetorical Criticism Essay
Key Insight 2 Artifact 1 - Rhetorical Criticism Essay
manifestations of the feminist movement undoubtedly stand out in prominence and importance.
By newly incorporating men as feminist advocates and by bringing awareness to gender issues
affecting men, the current wave of feminism heralds a pivotal moment in the fight for gender
equality defined by male involvement. Many tie this new manifestation of feminism to the
HeForShe Campaign conducted by the United Nation, a campaign which was championed by
UN Women Global Goodwill Ambassador and renowned actress Emma Watson. In a personal
and profound speech for the launching of the HeForShe Campaign, Watson effectively argues for
the need to both revalute feminist goals and to redfine feminism itself. Through the use of
rhetorical situation, the remainder of this essay will serve to analyze the merits of this speech as
Established in 1945 after the Second World War, The United Nations, or the UN as its
more commonly known, boasts over 190 member states and serves as a leader in the awareness
and resolution of global issues (1). One such issue that the UN promotes is the ongoing
prevalence of global gender inequality. In 2010, the United Nations combined 4 distinct parts of
its system to create a sole entity devoted to gender equality and women’s empowerment: UN
Women (2). UN Women serves to aid international governments in the implementation and
revision of policies, provide technical and financial support to those countries as necessary, and
to hold the United Nations system accountable for their own efforts in regards to gender equality.
These roles of the UN Women all contribute to their overall aims of eliminating discrimination
against women, empowering women, and achieving true gender equality in all aspects of life by
1
fighting for women at the local, regional, and governmental level. Since its inception, UN
Women has made substantial advancements towards the actualization of these goals, for example
in facilitating the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action as well as the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (2). Another significant achievement
2014, this global social movement campaign sought to reevaluate feminism by encouraing “men
and people of all genders to stand in solidarity with women to create a bold, visible, and united
force for gender equality.” (3) Essentially, HeForShe sought to move the narrative of feminism
away from the label of being a “women’s issue” only, and instead to define it as a human rights
issue. Through this inclusive approach in which men act as fellow instigators of gender equality,
HeForShe seeks to achieve its four broad goals: to accelerate women’s economic empowerment,
to support women’s role in peace and security processes, to advance women’s political
participation and leadership, and to eliminate gender based violence (5). This approach to
feminism forever reconstructed narratives and definitions of feminism and encapsulates the
Watson in its conception and launching. Although initially the merits of appointing Watson, a
famous British actress best known for her leading role in the Harry Potter franchise, was a source
of controversy, her landmark speech at the launching of HeForShe in 2014 remains a universally
Undoubtedly, the exigence prompting the necessity for Watson’s speech is the pervasive
and urgent issue of gender inequality. UN Women, the institutional backing of HeForShe,
2
addressing. These issues include, but are not limited to, women’s lack of access to suitable
employment, gender wage gaps, denial of health care and education, lack of political
representation, and direct acts of violence and discrimination. These and other issues are so
deeply omnipresent that, as Watson describes in her speech, “no country in the world can yet say
they have achieved gender equality” (4). Despite the indisputable prevalence of gender
inequality and its problematic results, Watson further describes ithe reluctance of individuals in
our society to firmly affirm themselves as feminists. She points out stereotypical assumptions of
feminists as “too strong, too aggressive, isolating, anti-men, and unattractive” and how these
stereotypes result in the damaging rejection of the feminist movement itself (4). Watson then
exemplifies the personal harms these stereotypes inflicted on her, recalling being labelled as
“bossy” when boys were not, being sexualized at a young age, her female friends dropping out of
athletics for the fear of no longer appearing attractive, and her male friends suffering from
inabilities to express their feelings. These personal examples not only bolster Watson’s
credibility in talking about feminism, but also serve as a powerful demonstration of how
common instances of gender inequality are in our society. They effectively convince the
audience of how deeply issues associated discrimination affect even the most seeimingly
privleged members of society. Due to the paradoxical unpopularity of feminism combined with
the damages of not implementing feminist aims, Watson urges for a new approach to feminism.
She utilizes the HeForShe campaign as a common ground for the audience amongst the
controversies and complications of feminism, finishing her argument with the statement, “And if
you still hate the word - it is not the word that is important but the idea and the ambition behind
it” (4). In this way, Watson successfully assesses the components of the feminist movement most
in need of revision and then implements the frustrations over those issues to bolster the
3
HeForShe movement’s validity and to encourage her audience to support its aims and become
agents of change.
Along with addressing the exigence for the HeForShe campaign, Watson also establishes
the need for her audience to be involved in the campaign and to care about its goals. What is so
notable about Watson’s inclusion of the audience, however, is the direct addressal of men as
members of her audience. At one point in her speech, Watson even goes so far as to directly
address men, saying “Men - I would like to take this opportunity to extend your formal
invitation. Gender equality is your issue too” (4). By singling out men as necessary components
of the feminist movement, Watson instigates a profound change in the approaches to feminism,
debunking stereotypes of feminism being solely a concern of women. Throughout the entirety of
her speech, she explicitly involves men as an active component of her audience. For example,
when detailing the harmful consequences of gender inequality, Waston pointedly uses examples
of men being harmed by gender stereotypes. Notably, she mentions how mental illness remains
unaddressed in men to the extent that suicide was the leading killer of men in the UK, all due to
the prevelent fear that asking for help is somehow demasculating (4). This and other powerful
examples effectively demonstrate to her audience that feminism is as much a concern for males
as it is for females, further bolstering her incorporation of males as a part of her audience.
Watson then unifies her audience by describing how the deleterious effects of gender inequality
on the respective genders are intertwined rather than two separate entities. She points out how
the aggression of men corresponds to the submission of women, how the expectation of men to
control leads to women as the ones being controlled, and how the strength of men and the
4
both genders into a unified struggle faced by all humans, Watson exemplifies the urgency of her
Despite the strengths of her argument, Watson recognizes the constraints of her
credibility due to her associations with acting, a domain seemingly distinct from the gravity of
the United Nations. Watson bluntly addresses this association, stating “You might be thinking
who is this Harry Potter girl? And what is she doing up on stage at the UN?”(4). She then
brilliantly affirms her credibility in giving the speech, as well as furthers the agenda of the
HeForShe campaign, by later following up with the renowned quote, “If not me, who? If not
now, when?”(4). These questions brilliantly erase any doubts surrounding her prerogative in
giving the speech along with any doubts of the audience in whether they should take up the
mantle of supporting the HeForShe agenda. Essentially, by boosting her own credibility she also
boosts the credibility of the audience in being qualified to join her in advocating for the
HeForShe agenda. By directly acknowledging the controversy surrounding her position at this
event, Watson successfully unravels opposing arguments undermining her authority and
message.
allowed for the revolutionary success of the HeForShe inclusive feminism movement,
destigmatized feminism, and sparked a new wave of motivation in promoting global gender
equality.
5
References
(1) United Nations. (n.d.). About Us. United Nations. Retrieved December 10, 2021, from
https://www.un.org/en/about-us.
(2) United Nations. (n.d.). About Us. United Nations. Retrieved December 10, 2021, from
https://www.un.org/en/about-us.
(3) Resources. HeForShe. (n.d.). Retrieved December 10, 2021, from
https://www.heforshe.org/en/movement.
(4) Emma Watson: Gender equality is your issue too. UN Women. (n.d.). Retrieved
December 10, 2021, from
https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2014/9/emma-watson-gender-equality-is-your
-issue-too.
(5) HeForShe. HeForShe | UN Women USA. (n.d.). Retrieved December 10, 2021, from
https://unwomenusa.org/advocacy-3.