0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views

Geys 2014

This document discusses opportunities for increasing biosurfactant production through biotechnological methods. It summarizes that two classes of biosurfactants, glycolipids and lipopeptides, show commercial potential but production challenges remain. The document then focuses on rhamnolipids as a widely studied glycolipid biosurfactant. Traditional approaches to optimize wild-type producers and fermentation processes can increase yields but are limited. Biotechnological engineering offers new ways to improve production, such as genetically engineering wild-type producers or developing heterologous production systems, which could achieve higher titers and new molecular variations to enhance commercial viability.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views

Geys 2014

This document discusses opportunities for increasing biosurfactant production through biotechnological methods. It summarizes that two classes of biosurfactants, glycolipids and lipopeptides, show commercial potential but production challenges remain. The document then focuses on rhamnolipids as a widely studied glycolipid biosurfactant. Traditional approaches to optimize wild-type producers and fermentation processes can increase yields but are limited. Biotechnological engineering offers new ways to improve production, such as genetically engineering wild-type producers or developing heterologous production systems, which could achieve higher titers and new molecular variations to enhance commercial viability.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com

ScienceDirect

Biotechnological opportunities in biosurfactant


production
Robin Geys, Wim Soetaert1 and Inge Van Bogaert1

In the recent years, biosurfactants proved to be an interesting for the classic petrochemical surfactants. Because of their
alternative to petrochemically derived surfactants. Two classes interesting properties like low ecotoxicity [2], easy bio-
of biosurfactants, namely glycolipids and lipopeptides, have degradability [3] and mild production conditions, biosur-
attracted significant commercial interest. Despite their factants have numerous potential applications in a wide
environmental advantages and equal performance, variety of industrial sectors [4].
commercialization of these molecules remains a challenge due
to missing acquaintance of the applicants, higher price and Still, some obstacles remain. Often issues like low titers
lack of structural variation. The latter two issues can partially be combined with high production costs hamper market
tackled by screening for novel and better wild-type producers penetration and limited structural variation hinders integ-
and optimizing the fermentation process. Yet, these traditional ration in all application domains. To counter these pro-
approaches cannot overcome all hurdles. In this review, an blems, a lot of effort has been put into engineering the
overview is given on how biotechnology offers opportunities for production process using either waste streams [5], opti-
increased biosurfactant production and the creation of new mizing the fermentation parameters and product recovery
types of molecules, in this way enhancing their commercial [6]. With the rise of biotechnical engineering, new ways
potential. for improving the production of biosurfactants became
Addresses available. Both the engineering of wild-type producers as
Centre of Expertise for Industrial Biotechnology and Biocatalysis, the development of heterologous production systems are
Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, viable approaches towards increased titers and enlarged
9000 Gent, Belgium
molecular diversity.
Corresponding author: Van Bogaert, Inge ([email protected])
1
Shared senior authorship. Two classes of biosurfactants are currently considered
of industrial and economical relevance: glycolipids and
lipopeptides, both low-molecular weight biosurfactants.
Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2014, 30:66–72
The ones discussed in this review are the rhamnolipids,
This review comes from a themed issue on Chemical biotechnology
sophorolipids, cellobiose lipids and mannosylerythritol
Edited by Curt R Fischer and Steffen Schaffer lipids for the glycolipids. Lipopeptides will be discussed
in a more general way.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2014.06.002 Rhamnolipids
0958-1669 # 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All right reserved. Rhamnolipids, perhaps the most studied glycolipids to
date, are composed of one or two L-rhamnose molecules
coupled to a mono or dimer of b-hydroxy fatty acids [7]
(Figure 1). They have interesting applications in, for
example, soil remediation [8] or pest control [9]. Rham-
nolipids are produced by several species from the Pseu-
Introduction domonas [10] and Burkholderia [11] genera with
Surfactants are known since ancient times. The earliest Pseudomonas aeruginosa being the top producer with titers
evidence of soap-making dates back to the Babylonians over 100 g/L. Rhamnolipids are commercialized by a
2800 years BC. Throughout history, more applications, couple of companies like Jeneil Biotech Inc. and Rham-
molecule types and resources were discovered. In 2012, nolipid Companies Inc., but the high price still hampers
the global surfactant market generated a revenue of further market penetration.
27 billion dollars and is expected to rise. Most of these
surfactants are obtained by chemical processes from pet- The biosynthesis of rhamnolipids depends on two path-
rochemical and oleochemical resources. During recent ways delivering the necessary molecules. The first one is
years, a shift towards more environmentally friendly the production of dTDP-L-rhamnose by the rmlABCD
surfactants is observed, caused by a growing awareness operon; glucose-1-phosphate is converted to the activated
of both consumers and companies for the adverse rhamnose that serves as a donor for the hydrophilic part
effects that surfactants can have on the environment of the rhamnolipids. The hydrophobic part originates
[1]. Biosurfactants, surfactants produced by micro-organ- from b-hydroxy fatty acids coupled to an acyl carrier
isms from renewable resources, are a worthy alternative protein. Two of these molecules are coupled by RhlA

Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2014, 30:66–72 www.sciencedirect.com


Biotechnological opportunities for biosurfactants Geys, Soetaert and Van Bogaert 67

Figure 1 the Vitreoscilla hemoglobin gene vgb. Such strains show a


7-fold increase compared to the wild-type [21]. This
H
O might be correlated to the higher oxygen uptake which
O enhances cell density and production.
HO O O
CH3 O
H H OH Production of rhamnolipids results in a mixture of both
H H monorhamnolipids and dirhamnolipids. By knocking-out
OH
rhlC, encoding a rhamnosyltransferase, only monorham-
H
O
nolipids are produced without a big loss in production
O
HO titers [22].
CH3
H H

H H Engineering of species other than P. aeruginosa has been


CH3
CH3 reported as well. Using this strategy, the opportunistic
OH HO
pathogenic nature of this micro-organism, which is a
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
serious burden both on the production and application,
can be circumvented. Usually, the P. aeruginosa rhlAB
Structure of the dirhamnolipid a-L-rhamnopyranosyl-a-L-
rhanopyranosyl-b-hydroxydecanoyl-b-hydroxydecanoate. Further operon is expressed in a strain that is resistant towards
variation is possible in the hydrophobic part by incorporation of b- high biosurfactant concentrations [23]. Using several
hydroxy fatty acids ranging in length from 8 to 16 carbon atoms and Pseudomonas putida strains like KT2440 [23], KT2442
potential unsaturations. [24] and KCTC1067 [25], titers ranging from 0.6 g/L
[24] to 7 g/L [25] were obtained. This lower production
compared to P. aeruginosa might be explained by insuffi-
to form 3-(3-hydroxyalkanoyloxy)alkanoic acids. Finally, cient production of the dTDP-L-rhamnose precursor, a
RhlB and RhlC will link the hydrophilic and hydrophobic necessary substrate for the rhamnosyltransferases [25].
part to form respectively monorhamnolipids and dirham-
nolipids [7]. Other production hosts were evaluated as well, such as
Escherichia coli strains W2190 [26] and BL21 [27]. When
In P. aeruginosa, direct and indirect factors like quorum using the same strategy as described above, maximum
sensing, nutritional status or stress response influence production titers of 0.18 g/L are feasible. Again, it is
rhamnolipid production [12]. Various attempts have been suggested that the flux through the dTDP-L-rhamnose
made to interfere with these regulatory mechanisms. synthesis pathway is too low to guarantee higher
AlgR, a regulator involved in several pathways like algi- production titers [26]. By introducing the rhlAB operon
nate production [13], has an impact on rhamnolipid from P. aeruginosa PAO1 in Burkholderia kururiensis KP23,
production. A recent paper proves the direct involvement a 6-fold increase from 0.78 g/L to 5.67 g/L could be
of AlgR in the expression of the rhlAB operon by binding detected [28].
to the promotor [14]. Deletion of this regulator shows an
increased rhamnolipid production in biofilm compared to Sophorolipids
the wild-type PAO1-strain [15]. Unfortunately, no differ- Sophorolipids, another well-studied type of glycolipids,
ences could be observed when the strains were grown in are produced by certain yeast strains like Starmerella
liquid medium. RhlR, a regulatory protein binding to the bombicola [29], Wickerhamiella domercqiae [30] and Candida
promoter of the rhlAB operon, has a more subtle role. batistae [31]. The molecules are constituted out of a
Depending on the butanoyl-homoserine lactone (C4- sophorose molecule (2-O-b-D-glucopyranosyl-D-gluco-
HSL) levels, an autoinducer that binds directly to RhlR, pyranose) linked to a terminal or subterminal hydroxyl-
this regulator works either as an activator or as an inhibitor ated fatty acid (Figure 2). The first step in the
for the transcription of the operon [16]. When no C4-HSL biosynthesis of sophorolipids is the terminal or subterm-
is present, RhlR acts as an inhibitor. Mutant strains inal hydroxylation of a fatty acid by the cytochrome P450
deficient in lasR, an essential gene for the production monooxygenase enzyme CYP52M1. In a stepwise man-
of C4-HSL, show no production of rhamnolipids [17]. ner, the UDP-glucose dependent glucosyltransferases
Still, even when RhlR is present with its autoinducer C4- UgtA1 and UgtB1 add the two glucose units to form a
HSL, production is not always guaranteed [18]. Other non-acetylated acidic sophorolipids. These can undergo
regulators like PtxR, RsaL, RsmA, DksA and several further modifications like acetylation by an specific
genes encoding sigma factors like RpoN and RpoS also acetyltransferase and lactonization between the free
influence the expression levels of the rhlAB operon carboxylic end and the C400 of the sophorose unit, which
[12,19,20]. Great potential lies in uncoupling the pro- is governed by an extracellular lactone esterase [32,33,34].
duction of rhamnolipids from this complex regulatory Sophorolipids are used in several products like hard sur-
system. Another strategy for enhancing rhamnolipid pro- face cleaning products from companies like Ecover and
duction is the creation of a P. aeruginosa strain harboring Saraya. S. bombicola, known for the efficient production of

www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2014, 30:66–72


68 Chemical biotechnology

Figure 2 form in concentrations comparable to the wild-type


strains [34]. Overexpression of the lactonase results in
OR1 CH3 producing lactonic sophorolipids at relative higher pro-
O
duct titers compared to the wild-type. These engineering
H O
H attempts show that it is possible to steer the production of
OH H very specific types of molecules with this yeast.
HO H
OR2 H Cellobiose lipids
H O Cellobiose lipids are produced by several fungi like
H Ustilago maydis and Pseudozyma flocculosa. They are com-
OH H O
posed of cellobiose (4-O-b-D-glucopyranosyl-D-glucopyr-
HO H
anose) attached to a hydroxylated palmitic acid
H OH (Figure 3a). The cellobiose lipids from P. flocculosa have
been used as a biological fungicide under the name
Sporodex L [38]. In U. maydis, the production is initiated
under nitrogen starvation. It has to be said that U. maydis
R1 = H or COCH3
produces two classes of glycolipids under these con-
R2 = H or COCH3 ditions, cellobiose lipids and mannosyl erythritol lipids
(MEL’s), with titers of glycolipids up to 30 g/L with
varying amounts of MEL’s and cellobiose lipids [39].

O Deletion of either the mannosyltransferase emt1 or the


cytochrome P450 monooxygenase cyp1 genes results in
OH total blockage of respectively the MEL’s or cellobiose
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
lipids biosynthesis, allowing recovery of one type of
glycolipid. Biosynthesis of cellobiose lipids in U. maydis
Structure of an acidic sophorolipid with oleic acid as hydrophobic group. is carried out by a gene cluster containing al the genes
necessary. The synthesis is initiated by Cyp1, a
cytochrome P450 enzyme necessary for terminal
hydroxylation of palmitic acid. A second hydroxyl group
sophorolipids up to 400 g/L [29], is the best studied is introduced by Cyp2 at the v-1 position. The cello-
producer so far. biose moiety is coupled to this 15,16-dihydroxy palmi-
tic acid by Ugt1, a glucosyltransferase capable of
Several knock-out strains were created for the production sequential glucosylation. Further modifications are
of modified sophorolipids. Production of medium-chain carried out by Uat1, an acetyl/acyl transferase, and
sophorolipids is challenging as the required special sub- Ahd1, responsible for the partial a-hydroxylation of
strates such as primary alcohols and diols are readily the palmitic acid [40].
metabolized in b-oxidation. Knocking out the multifunc-
tional enzyme type 2 (MFE-2), catalyzing the second and Regulation of cellobiose lipids production in U. maydis is
third step of the b-oxidation, enhances the production of governed by Rua1, a transcription factor interacting with
sophorolipids with shorter chain lengths up to 3 times the cluster genes and located herein [41]. Overexpression
compared to the wild-type strain [35]. Still, the depen- of this regulator promoted biosurfactant production
dence on special substrates instead of vegetable oil already in the exponential growth phase.
greatly affecting the production cost.
Other engineering possibilities have been reported as
Another example involves the acetyltransferase, necessary well. Deletion mutants of the cyp2, ahd1, uat1 and uhd1
for acetylation of the sophorose group. A knock-out strain genes in U. maydis produce altered cellobiose lipids [42].
of this gene produces purely unacetylated sophorolipids These genes are respectively responsible for the v-1
[36]. Yet another example of a successful knock-out hydroxylation (cyp2) and a-hydroxylation (ahd1) of the
involves ugtB1, the gene responsible for the addition of fatty acid tail, the acylation and acetylation of the cello-
a second molecule of glucose in the sophorolipid biosyn- biose group (uat1) and the hydroxylation of the short-
thesis. After a prolonged fermentation, a mixture of acetyl- chain fatty acid coupled to the cellobiose group (uhd1).
ated and non-acetylated glucolipids was obtained [37]. Unfortunately no data are available on the cellobiose
lipids titers of these knock-out strains.
A final engineering example is that of the lacton esterase,
the enzyme catalyzing lactonization of the sophorolipids. Interestingly, only one glucosyltransferase is present in
Knock-out strains are capable of producing the acidic the cellobiose lipid gene cluster [42] and it is suggested

Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2014, 30:66–72 www.sciencedirect.com


Biotechnological opportunities for biosurfactants Geys, Soetaert and Van Bogaert 69

Figure 3

(a) O OH O
CH3

O OH
O R1
H O
H R1 = H or OH
OH H
HO
H n = 2 or 4
H O H OH
H
OH H O
HO H
(b) HO
H O
O
HO H
R1 O
HO H
OH
O
( (n H O
H
CH3 OR3 OR4
R1 , R2 = H or COCH3
R2O H
R3 , R4 = H or C2-C18 fatty acid
H H
Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Structures of the glycolipids produced in U. maydis (a) cellobiose lipids; (b) mannosylerythritol lipids.

that this transferase performs both glucosylation reactions. higher production. The discovery of Mat1, the acetyl-
The codon optimized ugt1 gene from U. maydis was used transferase responsible for both acetylation reactions,
for the heterologous production of cellobiose lipids in S. showed that it is possible to produce deacetylated MEL’s
bombicola. By replacing the second glucosyltransferase without highly influencing the production capacity [48].
ugtB1 from S. bombicola, a new strain capable of synthesiz-
ing cellobiose lipids [43] was created. Even though 70% Lipopeptides
of the molecules are mainly glucolipids, a diverse popu- Several species like Aspergillus, Bacillus or Pseudomonas are
lation of cellobiose lipids was observed as well. Most of capable of synthesizing lipopeptides. These molecules
these cellobiose lipids are new-to-nature and consist of a are characterized by a small oligopeptide, either linear or
C18 hydroxy fatty acid tail and no acylations of the circular, coupled to a b-hydroxy fatty acid. The oligopep-
cellobiose group. Also no lactonization is observed. Still, tide varies both in number and types of amino acids [49].
optimization is required because of the glucolipid con- Unusual or non-proteiogenic amino acids are incorporated
tamination and less than optimal product concentrations. as well, for example in surfactin (Figure 4), synthesized by
Bacillus subtilis, two D-leucine molecules are present [50].
Mannosylerythritol lipids In the case of surfactin, titers of 3.6 g/L are possible [51].
Mannosylerythritol lipids (MEL’s) are interesting com-
pounds consisting of a 4-O-b-D-mannopyranosyl-meso- Figure 4
erythritol with various acylation and acetylation patterns,
depending on the production organism and substrates
Asp
used (Figure 3b). The titers of these molecules can easily Leu Val
reach 100 g/L or more [44]. Special interest goes out to Leu
these molecules because of their self-assembling proper- Leu
ties [45], potential pharmaceutical applications [46] and O
H3C Leu
their usage in cosmetics [47]. The Japanese companies
Toyobo and Kanebo Cosmetics commercialize MEL’s. Glu
( )9
As mentioned in ‘‘Cellobiose lipids’’ section, some engin- H3C
eering is done to optimize production in U. maydis. O
Deletion of emt1, the gene encoding the erythritol/ Current Opinion in Biotechnology

mannose transferase, resulted in total loss of the pro-


duction while overexpression did not necessarily lead to Structure of surfactin, a lipopeptide from B. subtilis.

www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2014, 30:66–72


70 Chemical biotechnology

Lipopeptides have drawn significant interest because of new possibilities to fully capture the metabolic potential
their potential as antimicrobial agents [52]. of micro-organisms have risen. The development of heter-
ologous production systems with non-pathogenic species,
Significant effort has been put into engineering of the the progress towards entire production platforms for a
hydrophilic oligopeptide structure. This peptide is syn- range of molecules and utilizing previously unsuitable
thesized by a nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS). waste streams as cheap substrates are just a few examples
This is a multienzyme complex which can further be of what is possible thanks to biotechnology. Eventually,
divided in subunits, modules and domains. Each module the combination of each success in the creation of cheaper
is responsible for the incorporation of one amino acid and and more diversified biosurfactants will result in further
they contain the necessary domains for the elongation of commercialization of these molecules.
the peptidyl chain. Several modules can be grouped
together in a subunit, a monomer being part of the Acknowledgements
multienzyme complex. A first strategy is the exchange This work was made possible by the Flemish Agency for Innovation by
Science and Technology (IWT; Grant 121129) and the European FP7
of subunits of the NRPS. In the case of daptomycin, project Biosurfing (Grant 289219).
a lipopeptide produced by Streptomyces roseosporus,
replacing the final subunit DptD results in compounds References and recommended reading
differing in the last two amino acid of the peptide core Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review,
[53]. The second option is the exchange or deletion of have been highlighted as:

modules [54] and of domains within these modules [55].


 of special interest
This leads to peptide cores differing in number and types
of amino acids. By targeting the genes responsible for  of outstanding interest
modification of amino acids [56], even greater diversity 1. Ivanković T, Hrenović J: Surfactants in the environment. Arch
can be created. Besides oligopeptide engineering, modi- Ind Hyg Toxicol 2010, 61:95-110.
fication of the fatty acid tail has been attempted as well. 2. Franzetti A, Gandolfi I, Raimondi C, Bestetti G, Banat IM,
This has been successful in the case of the lipopeptides Smyth TJP, Papacchini M, Cavallo M, Fracchia L: Environmental
fate, toxicity, characteristics and potential applications of
from Streptomyces coelicolor where a shorter tail was intro- novel bioemulsifiers produced by Variovorax paradoxus
duced [57]. 7bCT5. Bioresour Technol 2012, 108:245-251.
3. Lima TMS, Procópio LC, Brandão FD, Leão BA, Tótola MR,
A couple of examples exist where engineering of the Borges AC: Evaluation of bacterial surfactant toxicity towards
petroleum degrading microorganisms. Bioresour Technol 2011,
production strain leads to significantly higher production 102:2957-2964.
levels. Random mutagenesis strategies resulted in mutant 4. Reis RS, Pacheco GJ, Pereira AG, Freire DMG: Biosurfactants:
strains with production capacities up to twelve times production and applications. In Biodegradation — Life of
Science. Edited by Chamy R. InTech; 2013:31-61.
more compared to the original wild-type producers
[58]. Genome shuffling was used for enhancing the sur- 5. George S, Jayachandran K: Production and characterization of
 rhamnolipid biosurfactant from waste frying coconut oil using
factin production in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. The recom- a novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa D. J Appl Microbiol 2013,
binant strains are capable of producing up to 10 times 114:373-383.
This research is a fine example of what is possible by searching for novel
more compared to the wild-type [59]. More targeted wild-type producers and combining this with the usage of cheap waste
methods like overexpression of certain genes or ribosome substrates.
engineering are possible as well. In the case of S. roseos- 6. Coutte F, Lecouturier D, Leclère V, Béchet M, Jacques P,
porus, three target genes where identified by in silico  Dhulster P: New integrated bioprocess for the continuous
production, extraction and purification of lipopeptides
modeling. Two of them, dptI and dptJ, are govern modi- produced by Bacillus subtilis in membrane bioreactor. Process
fications of amino acids, while the third one is involved in Biochem 2013, 48:25-32.
By utilizing a membrane reactor, continuous production and purification
glucose catabolism. Co-overexpression resulted in a pro- of biosurfactants was achieved. Several grams of lipopeptides were
duction increase of 43.2% [60]. An example of ribosome obtained at high purities.
engineering can again be found in S. roseosporus. When 7. Abdel-Mawgoud AM, Lépine F, Déziel E: Rhamnolipids: diversity
using streptomycin, resistant mutants showed a 2.2-fold of structures, microbial origins and roles. Appl Microbiol
Biotechnol 2010, 86:1323-1336.
increase in production of daptomycin. A single mutation
in the rpsL gene is responsible for this higher production 8. Mulligan CN, Wang S: Remediation of a heavy metal-
contaminated soil by a rhamnolipid foam. Eng Geol 2006,
[61]. 85:75-81.
9. Sha R, Jiang L, Meng Q, Zhang G, Song Z: Producing cell-free
Conclusion culture broth of rhamnolipids as a cost-effective fungicide
Even though petrochemical surfactants still dominate the against plant pathogens. J Basic Microbiol 2012, 52:458-466.
market, there is a growing interest in ecological surfac- 10. Giani C, Meiwes J, Rothert R, Wullbrandt D: Pseudomonas
tants. Examples of successfully commercialized biosur- aeruginosa and its use in a Process for the Biotechnological
Preparation of L-rhamnose. 1997.
factants exist, but full market penetration is still hampered
11. Hörmann B, Müller MM, Syldatk C, Hausmann R: Rhamnolipid
by high production costs, low product titers or a combi- production by Burkholderia plantarii DSM 9509T. Eur J Lipid Sci
nation of both. With the recent advances in biotechnology, Technol 2010, 112:674-680.

Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2014, 30:66–72 www.sciencedirect.com


Biotechnological opportunities for biosurfactants Geys, Soetaert and Van Bogaert 71

12. Reis RS, Pereira AG, Neves BC, Freire DMG: Gene regulation of Characterization of the rhamnolipid produced by the non-pathogenic
rhamnolipid production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa — a bacteria Burkholderia kururiensis. Metabolic engineering has been done
review. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:6377-6384. as well by introducing the rhlAB genes from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
13. Lizewski SE, Lundberg DS, Schurr MJ: The transcriptional 29. Daniel H-J, Reuss M, Syldatk C: Production of sophorolipids in
regulator AlgR is essential for Pseudomonas aeruginosa high concentration from deproteinized whey and rapeseed oil
pathogenesis. Infect Immun 2002, 70:6083-6093. in a two stage fed batch process using Candida bombicola
ATCC 22214 and Cryptococcus curvatus ATCC 20509.
14. Okkotsu Y, Tieku P, Fitzsimmons LF, Churchill ME, Schurr MJ: Biotechnol Lett 1998, 20:1153-1156.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa AlgR phosphorylation modulates
rhamnolipid production and motility. J Bacteriol 2013, 30. Park TH, Gu MB, Lee J, Chen J, Song X, Zhang H, Qu Y:
195:5499-5515. Production, structure elucidation and anticancer properties of
sophorolipid from Wickerhamiella domercqiae. Enzyme Microb
15. Morici LA, Carterson AJ, Wagner VE, Frisk A, Schurr JR, Höner zu Technol 2006, 39:501-506.
Bentrup K, Hassett DJ, Iglewski BH, Sauer K, Schurr MJ:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa AlgR represses the Rhl quorum- 31. Konishi M, Fukuoka T, Morita T, Imura T, Kitamoto D: Production
sensing system in a biofilm-specific manner. J Bacteriol 2007, of new types of sophorolipids by Candida batistae. J Oleo Sci
189:7752-7764. 2008, 57:359-369.
16. Medina G, Juarez K, Valderrama B, Soberón-Chávez G: 32. Asmer H-J, Lang S, Wagner F, Wray V: Microbial production,
Mechanism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa RhlR transcriptional structure elucidation and bioconversion of sophorose lipids. J
regulation of the rhlAB promoter. J Bacteriol 2003, 185:5976- Am Oil Chem Soc 1988, 65:1460-1466.
5983.
33. Van Bogaert INA, Holvoet K, Roelants SLKW, Li B, Lin Y-C, Van de
17. Medina G, Juárez K, Dı́az R, Soberón-Chávez G: Transcriptional Peer Y, Soetaert W: The biosynthetic gene cluster for
regulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa rhlR, encoding a sophorolipids: a biotechnological interesting biosurfactant
quorum-sensing regulatory protein. Microbiology 2003, produced by Starmerella bombicola. Mol Microbiol 2013,
149:3073-3081. 88:501-509.
18. Medina G, Juarez K, Soberón-Chávez G: The Pseudomonas 34. Ciesielska K, Van Bogaert IN, Chevineau S, Li B, Groeneboer S,
aeruginosa rhlAB operon is not expressed during the Soetaert W, Van de Peer Y, Devreese B: Exoproteome analysis of
logarithmic phase of growth even in the presence of its Starmerella bombicola results in the discovery of an esterase
activator RhlR and the autoinducer N-butyryl-homoserine required for lactonization of sophorolipids. J Proteomics 2014,
lactone. J Bacteriol 2003, 185:377-380. 98:159-174.
19. Carty NL, Layland N, Colmer-Hamood JA, Calfee MW, Pesci EC, 35. Van Bogaert INA, Sabirova J, Develter D, Soetaert W,
Hamood AN: PtxR modulates the expression of QS-controlled Vandamme EJ: Knocking out the MFE-2 gene of Candida
virulence factors in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain bombicola leads to improved medium-chain sophorolipid
PAO1. Mol Microbiol 2006, 61:782-794. production. FEMS Yeast Res 2009, 9:610-617.
20. Rampioni G, Schuster M, Greenberg EP, Zennaro E, Leoni L: 36. Saerens KMJ, Saey L, Soetaert W: One-step production of
Contribution of the RsaL global regulator to Pseudomonas unacetylated sophorolipids by an acetyltransferase negative
aeruginosa virulence and biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol Candida bombicola. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011, 108:2923-2931.
Lett 2009, 301:210-217.
37. Saerens KMJ, Zhang J, Saey L, Van Bogaert INA, Soetaert W:
21. Kahraman H, Erenler SO: Rhamnolipid production by Cloning and functional characterization of the UDP-
Pseudomonas aeruginosa engineered with the Vitreoscilla glucosyltransferase UgtB1 involved in sophorolipid
hemoglobin gene. Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol 2012, 48:212-217. production by Candida bombicola and creation of a glucolipid-
producing yeast strain. Yeast 2011, 28:279-292.
22. Rahim R, Ochsner UA, Olvera C, Graninger M, Messner P, Lam JS,
Soberón-Chávez G: Cloning and functional characterization of 38. Konstantinidou-Doltsinis S, Markellou E, Kasselaki A-M,
the Pseudomonas aeruginosa rhlC gene that encodes Siranidou E, Kalamarakis A, Tzembelikou K, Schmitt A,
rhamnosyltransferase 2, an enzyme responsible for di- Koumakis C, Malathrakis N: Control of powdery mildew of grape
W W
rhamnolipid biosynthesis. Mol Microbiol 2001, 40:708-718. in Greece using Sporodex L and Milsana . J Palnt Dis Prot
2007, 114:256-262.
23. Wittgens A, Tiso T, Arndt TT, Wenk P, Hemmerich J, Müller C,
Wichmann R, Küpper B, Zwick M, Wilhelm S et al.: Growth 39. Spoeckner S, Wray V, Nimtz M, Lang S: Glycolipids of the smut
independent rhamnolipid production from glucose using the fungus Ustilago maydis from cultivation on renewable
non-pathogenic Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Microb Cell Fact resources. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1999, 51:33-39.
2011, 10:80.
40. Teichmann B, Labbé C, Lefebvre F, Bölker M, Linne U,
24. Ochsner UA, Reiser J, Fiechter A, Witholt B: Production of Bélanger RR: Identification of a biosynthesis gene cluster for
Pseudomonas aeruginosa rhamnolipid biosurfactants in flocculosin a cellobiose lipid produced by the biocontrol agent
heterologous hosts. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995, Pseudozyma flocculosa. Mol Microbiol 2011, 79:1483-1495.
61:3503-3506.
41. Teichmann B, Liu L, Schink KO, Bölker M: Activation of the
25. Cha M, Lee N, Kim M, Kim M, Lee S: Heterologous production of ustilagic acid biosynthesis gene cluster in Ustilago maydis by
Pseudomonas aeruginosa EMS1 biosurfactant in the C2H2 zinc finger transcription factor Rua1. Appl Environ
Pseudomonas putida. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99:2192-2199. Microbiol 2010, 76:2633-2640.
26. Cabrera-Valladares N, Richardson A-P, Olvera C, Treviño LG, 42. Teichmann B, Linne U, Hewald S, Marahiel MA, Bölker M: A
Déziel E, Lépine F, Soberón-Chávez G: Monorhamnolipids and biosynthetic gene cluster for a secreted cellobiose lipid with
3-(3-hydroxyalkanoyloxy)alkanoic acids (HAAs) production antifungal activity from Ustilago maydis. Mol Microbiol 2007,
using Escherichia coli as a heterologous host. Appl Microbiol 66:525-533.
Biotechnol 2006, 73:187-194.
43. Roelants SLKW, Saerens KMJ, Derycke T, Li B, Lin Y-C, Van de
27. Wang Q, Fang X, Bai B, Liang X, Shuler PJ, Goddard WA, Tang Y:  Peer Y, De Maeseneire SL, Van Bogaert INA, Soetaert W: Candida
Engineering bacteria for production of rhamnolipid as an bombicola as a platform organism for the production of tailor-
agent for enhanced oil recovery. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007, made biomolecules. Biotechnol Bioeng 2013, 110:2494-2503.
98:842-853. Creation of a production platform of the biosurfactant producing yeast
Starmerella bombicola (formerly known as Candida bombicola) with
28. Tavares LFD, Silva PM, Junqueira M, Mariano DCO, heterologous production of cellobiose lipids as a proof of concept.
 Nogueira FCS, Domont GB, Freire DMG, Neves BC:
Characterization of rhamnolipids produced by wild-type and 44. Morita T, Konishi M, Fukuoka T, Imura T, Sakai H, Kitamoto D:
engineered Burkholderia kururiensis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Efficient production of di-acylated and tri-acylated
2013, 97:1909-1921. mannosylerythritol lipids as glycolipid biosurfactants by

www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2014, 30:66–72


72 Chemical biotechnology

Pseudozyma parantarctica JCM 11752(T). J Oleo Sci 2008, 54. Doekel S, Coëffet-Le Gal M-F, Gu J-Q, Chu M, Baltz RH, Brian P:
57:557-565. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase module fusions to produce
derivatives of daptomycin in Streptomyces roseosporus.
45. Worakitkanchanakul W, Imura T, Fukuoka T, Morita T, Sakai H, Microbiology 2008, 154:2872-2880.
Abe M, Rujiravanit R, Chavadej S, Minamikawa H, Kitamoto D:
Aqueous-phase behavior and vesicle formation of natural 55. Chiocchini C, Linne U, Stachelhaus T: In vivo biocombinatorial
glycolipid biosurfactant, mannosylerythritol lipid-B. Colloids synthesis of lipopeptides by COM domain-mediated
Surf B Biointerfaces 2008, 65:106-112. reprogramming of the surfactin biosynthetic complex.
Chem Biol 2006, 13:899-908.
46. Inoh Y, Furuno T, Hirashima N, Kitamoto D, Nakanishi M: Rapid
delivery of small interfering RNA by biosurfactant MEL-A- 56. Alexander DC, Rock J, Gu J-Q, Mascio C, Chu M, Brian P,
containing liposomes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011, Baltz RH: Production of novel lipopeptide antibiotics related to
414:635-640. A54145 by Streptomyces fradiae mutants blocked in
biosynthesis of modified amino acids and assignment
47. Morita T, Fukuoka T, Imura T, Kitamoto D: Production of
of lptJ, lptK and lptL gene functions. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2011,
mannosylerythritol lipids and their application in cosmetics.
64:79-87.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013, 97:4691-4700.
48. Hewald S, Linne U, Scherer M, Marahiel MA, Kämper J, Bölker M: 57. Powell A, Borg M, Amir-Heidari B, Neary JM, Thirlway J,
Identification of a gene cluster for biosynthesis of Wilkinson B, Smith CP, Micklefield J: Engineered biosynthesis of
mannosylerythritol lipids in the basidiomycetous fungus nonribosomal lipopeptides with modified fatty acid side
Ustilago maydis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006, 72:5469-5477. chains. J Am Chem Soc 2007, 129:15182-15191.

49. Strieker M, Marahiel MA: The structural diversity of acidic 58. Lin S-C, Lin K-G, Lo C-C, Lin Y-M: Enhanced biosurfactant
lipopeptide antibiotics. ChemBioChem 2009, 10:607-616. production by a Bacillus licheniformis mutant. Enzyme Microb
Technol 1998, 23:267-273.
50. Baumgart F, Kluge B, Ullrich C, Vater J, Ziessow D: Identification
of amino acid substitutions in the lipopeptide surfactin using 59. Zhao J, Li Y, Zhang C, Yao Z, Zhang L, Bie X, Lu F, Lu Z: Genome
2D NMR spectroscopy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1991, shuffling of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens for improving
177:998-1005. antimicrobial lipopeptide production and an analysis of
relative gene expression using FQ RT-PCR. J Ind Microbiol
51. Yeh M-S, Wei Y-H, Chang J-S: Enhanced production of Biotechnol 2012, 39:889-896.
surfactin from Bacillus subtilis by addition of solid carriers.
Biotechnol Prog 2005, 21:1329-1334. 60. Huang D, Wen J, Wang G, Yu G, Jia X, Chen Y: In silico aided
 metabolic engineering of Streptomyces roseosporus for
52. Huang X, Lu Z, Zhao H, Bie X, Lü F, Yang S: Antiviral activity of daptomycin yield improvement. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012,
antimicrobial lipopeptide from Bacillus subtilis fmbj against 94:637-649.
pseudorabies virus, porcine parvovirus, Newcastle disease This research depicts a fine example where bioinformatics can help to
virus and infectious bursal disease virus in vitro. Int J Pept Res steer the research towards specific targets for metabolic engineering.
Ther 2006, 12:373-377.
61. Wang L, Zhao Y, Liu Q, Huang Y, Hu C, Liao G: Improvement of
53. Coëffet-Le Gal M-F, Thurston L, Rich P, Miao VPW, Baltz RH: A21978C production in Streptomyces roseosporus by
Complementation of daptomycin dptA and dptD deletion reporter-guided rpsL mutation selection. J Appl Microbiol 2012,
mutations in trans and production of hybrid lipopeptide 112:1095-1101.
antibiotics. Microbiology 2006, 152:2993-3001.

Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2014, 30:66–72 www.sciencedirect.com

You might also like