Diagnosis of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Children - UpToDate
Diagnosis of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Children - UpToDate
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
INTRODUCTION
Growth hormone (GH) has been available for management of the short stature associated
with GH deficiency (GHD) for more than 60 years [1]; recombinant DNA-derived human GH
(rhGH) has been available since 1985. While availability is no longer a problem, there still
remains a number of difficulties with the diagnosis of GHD, resulting mainly from the lack of
appropriate tools to make (or exclude) the diagnosis reliably.
The incidence of short stature associated with GHD has been estimated to be approximately
1:4000 to 1:10,000 [2-4]. It is the primary indication for human GH treatment in childhood,
which entails years of treatment with subcutaneous injections and substantial cost for the
health care system. Based on these premises, it is clear that an accurate diagnosis is
essential [5,6].
The diagnosis of GHD in children is reviewed here. Related content is in the following
UpToDate topic reviews:
AUXOLOGY
The scientific study of growth and maturation of children (auxology) began some 250 years
ago [7] and is still an indispensable tool in pediatrics. Most pediatric endocrinologists agree
that the foundation for the diagnosis of GHD in childhood is based on a comparison of the
https://www-uptodate-com.bibliotecavirtual.udla.edu.ec/contents/diagnosis-of-growth-hormone-deficiency-in-children/print?search=growth hormo… 1/33
8/8/23, 13:45 Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children - UpToDate
child's growth pattern with established norms. A consensus view concluded that clinical
assessment of the growth-retarded child is the single most useful parameter in diagnosing
growth disorders and challenged the status of human GH measurements as the diagnostic
"gold standard" [8].
Errors in length or height measurements may be the result of unreliable equipment. For this
reason, all apparatus should be checked frequently. More often, measuring procedures are
at fault, perhaps in the positioning of the subject or in locating proper landmarks. (See
"Measurement of growth in children".)
Neonates and children younger than two years may be difficult to measure accurately; the
neonatometer (length stadiometer) and supine table are the recommended devices to
reduce errors in measuring. The vertical stadiometer is used to measure standing height,
which is recommended for children two to three years or older [9].
Length or height data should be plotted on the appropriate growth chart. Length is for
children measured lying down and should be used up to two to three years of age
( figure 1A-B); height is for children measured standing and should be used for children
over two to three years ( figure 2A-B). The severity of short stature is quantified by
determining the height percentiles or Z-scores from these charts or from calculators for boys
(calculator 1) or for girls (calculator 2).
Height velocity can be calculated from serial height determinations and plotted on
appropriate velocity charts ( figure 3A-B). A period of at least six months is necessary for
reliable calculation of height velocity of children above the age of two years. (See "Diagnostic
approach to children and adolescents with short stature", section on 'Evaluation of growth'.)
Approximately 3 to 30 percent of children with GHD have an affected parent, sibling, or child
[10,11]. Several genetic causes of GHD have been described [3] (see "Causes of
hypopituitarism", section on 'Genetic diseases'):
● POU1F1 gene mutations – The POU1F1 gene (known as Pit1 in rodents) is responsible for
pituitary-specific transcription of genes for GH, prolactin, thyrotropin, and the GH-
releasing hormone (GHRH) receptor [12,13]. Mutations of the POU1F1 gene are
transmitted as autosomal recessive or codominant traits and cause variable peptide
hormone deficiencies with or without anterior pituitary hypoplasia, known as combined
pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD) type 1 ( MIM #613038) [14-16]. One specific
mutation at the POU1F1 locus has been associated with dominantly inherited isolated
GHD [17].
● PROP1 gene mutations – PROP1 gene mutations result in failure to activate POU1F1/Pit1
gene expression and probably cause pituitary hypoplasia and/or familial multiple
pituitary hormone deficiency [18]; paradoxical cystic hyperplasia of the pituitary also
has been reported [19]. This is the most common known genetic cause of CPHD type 2
( MIM #262600) [20,21].
● GHRH receptor gene defects – Children with mutations in the GHRH receptor gene
(GHRHR; MIM 139191) have undetectable GH release during standard provocative
tests and after exogenous GHRH administration, but they respond to GH treatment.
● Deletions and mutations of the GH1 gene – GH1 ( MIM 139250) is the gene encoding
GH, located on chromosome 17. Gene deletions, frameshift mutations, and nonsense
mutations of GH1 have been described as causes of familial GHD [26].
CLINICAL PRESENTATION
GHD can be divided into congenital and acquired forms. The single most important clinical
manifestation of GHD is growth failure, and careful documentation of height velocity is
critical to making the correct diagnosis. In some children with congenital GHD or
hypopituitarism, the growth faltering may not be manifested until late infancy, as noted
below.
Congenital — Patients with congenital severe GHD have only a slightly reduced birth length
and may not immediately show growth failure. There is a higher frequency of breech
https://www-uptodate-com.bibliotecavirtual.udla.edu.ec/contents/diagnosis-of-growth-hormone-deficiency-in-children/print?search=growth hormo… 3/33
8/8/23, 13:45 Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children - UpToDate
presentation and perinatal asphyxia. Neonatal morbidity may include hypoglycemia and
prolonged jaundice.
The clinical presentation depends upon the severity of the GHD. Postnatal growth is
abnormal, and growth failure can occur during the first months of life [29-32] but may not be
obvious until 6 to 12 months of age, by which time the height velocity is definitely slow and
deviates from the normal growth curve, with length measurements often significantly below
the mean. Bone age becomes delayed but is similar to height age, unless there is concurrent
hypothyroidism.
In some cases, congenital GHD is associated with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies,
which affect the clinical manifestations. When GHD is combined with deficiency of
adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), hypoglycemia may be severe. The combination of GHD
with gonadotropin deficiency can cause microphallus, cryptorchidism, and hypoplasia of the
scrotum.
Some children with congenital GHD have associated pathologic variants in one of several
genes related to pituitary development or hormone formation, or with a structural brain
abnormality. Others have no identifiable cause. (See 'Molecular genetics of growth hormone
deficiency' above and "Causes of short stature", section on 'Growth hormone deficiency'.)
Acquired — Children with acquired GHD present with severe growth failure, delayed bone
age, and increased weight:height ratios. Causes of acquired GHD include intracranial tumors
involving the hypothalamic-pituitary region (eg, craniopharyngioma), cranial irradiation, and
head trauma.
Children with short stature should be evaluated with careful serial measurements of length
or height and compared with reference standards. (See 'Auxology' above.)
The clinical significance of the short stature depends on many factors, especially height
velocity, severity of the short stature, and genetic potential. Many children with moderate
short stature and normal growth (eg, height velocity at least 5 cm/year between four and six
years of age and at least 4 cm/year between six years and puberty) require only a basic
evaluation (including bone age evaluation), as outlined in a separate topic review. (See
"Diagnostic approach to children and adolescents with short stature".)
A more comprehensive evaluation is warranted in children with one or more of the following
features:
• Age two to four years – Height velocity less than 5.5 cm/year (<2.2 inches/year)
• Age four to six years – Height velocity less than 5 cm/year (<2 inches/year)
● Severe short stature (eg, height ≤-2.5 standard deviations [SD], ie, 0.6th percentile), or
less severe short stature combined with growth failure [33].
DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH
Once the decision to evaluate a short child has been made, a variety of different tests can be
performed.
The first step is to evaluate for other causes of growth failure, including chronic systemic
disease, hypothyroidism, Turner syndrome (in girls), and skeletal disorders. This is
accomplished through a thorough medical history and physical examination. Laboratory
evaluation should be performed when appropriate, including screens for systemic disease,
undernutrition, inflammation, and thyroid function, and a karyotype in girls to rule out
Turner syndrome. (See "Diagnostic approach to children and adolescents with short stature",
section on 'Laboratory and imaging studies'.)
If there is no evidence of these disorders, then the possibility of GHD should be investigated
with the following tests:
GHD is effectively excluded in children with a normal bone age and height velocity. In this
case, provocative testing for GHD is not required.
When GHD is congenital and near complete, the diagnosis is relatively easy to confirm
because affected children present with severe growth failure, delayed bone age, and very
low serum concentrations of GH, IGF-1, and IGFBP-3 [8]. For patients with all of these clinical
characteristics, it is reasonable to make the diagnosis of GHD without performing GH
stimulation testing.
Milder degrees of growth faltering and decreased IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels are consistent
with GHD but are also consistent with other causes of growth failure, including poor
nutrition. (See 'IGF-1 and IGFBP-3' below.)
If not explicable on the basis of undernutrition, low IGF-1 and/or IGFBP-3 levels are strongly
suggestive of a diagnosis of GHD, but this should be confirmed by provocative GH testing. In
addition, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hypothalamic-pituitary region (with and
without contrast) is recommended for children with suspected GHD [34]. (See 'Growth
hormone stimulation tests' below and 'Imaging' below.)
Between normal pulses of GH secretion, serum GH levels are often low, below the limits of
sensitivity of most conventional assays. Thus, measurement of a random serum GH level is
not helpful in diagnosing GHD and is used only to exclude the possibility of GH insensitivity.
Because of these issues, the diagnosis of GHD is made with a combination of clinical
assessment and auxology, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and insulin-like growth factor
binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) levels, and GH stimulation tests.
IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 — The determination of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels has become a widely
used tool in the diagnostic evaluation of growth disorders. IGF-1 is the mediator of the
majority of the growth-promoting actions of GH. (See "Physiology of insulin-like growth
factor 1".)
Despite relatively good correlations with groups of patients between GH secretion and IGF-1
concentrations [37-40], there remain substantial problems in assessing GH status by
measurement of IGF-1 in individual patients [41,42]:
● Normal IGF-1 values in children younger than three years may be very low and, in some
cases, may be below the lower limit of detection of the assay. As a result, the normal
range overlaps with that for GHD. Newer assays using mass spectrometry may resolve
this issue [43].
● Serum IGF-1 levels may be low in conditions other than GHD, such as GH insensitivity,
hypothyroidism [44], diabetes [45], renal failure [44,46], and cancer [47].
Of the six IGFBPs, IGFBP-3 is the major serum carrier protein for IGF-1 [48-50] and the most
GH-dependent [51]. IGFBP-3 levels are less nutritionally dependent and are more
discriminatory than those of IGF-1 in the lower end of the normal range. Although levels of
both IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 normally increase with age, IGFBP-3 is a better screening test for
GHD than IGF-1 in younger children because it is easier to distinguish low-normal levels of
IGFBP-3 in young children from truly low levels [52]. (See "Physiology of insulin-like growth
factor 1".)
Interpretation of results — For patients with growth failure or severe short stature, we
interpret the results of this testing as follows:
● Moderately or severely reduced IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 (eg, <-2 standard deviations [SD])
with delayed bone age:
• If the growth failure is severe, bone age is significantly delayed, and IGF-1 and
IGFBP-3 are definitively low (eg, <-2 SD), it is reasonable to make the diagnosis of
GHD without performing GH stimulation testing, especially in the setting of known
● Somewhat low IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 (eg, between 0 and -2 SD) – The decision about
whether to perform provocative GH testing depends on individual patient
characteristics, including the severity of growth failure, degree of bone age delay, and
whether the low levels can be explained by other factors, such as poor nutrition.
● Clearly normal IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 (SD ≥0); ie, in the upper one-half of the normal
range – GHD is extremely unlikely, and no further testing is required.
If the results of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 are discordant, IGF-1 takes precedence, except for infants
and young children, in whom IGFBP-3 should guide the decision about further testing. IGF-1
and IGFBP-3 levels should be interpreted against reference ranges that are standardized for
sex and age (or better, by stage of sexual development, if available). The range varies with
the assay used, and results should be interpreted against standards provided by the
laboratory performing the test [53]. Consideration of norms based on bone age rather than
chronologic age has also been recommended.
Provocative GH testing is not necessary for selected patients in whom other clinical criteria
are sufficient to make the diagnosis of GHD, including those with the following conditions:
● Infant or young child with extreme short stature (eg, height <-3 SD), normal nutrition,
significantly reduced IGF-1 (eg, <-2 SD) and IGFBP-3, and delayed bone age. This is the
classic presentation of congenital and severe GHD, and most experts agree that
provocative testing is not required to make the diagnosis.
Provocative testing also is not necessary for short children with a normal bone age and
height velocity or for those with clearly normal levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3. These findings
are sufficient to exclude GHD without provocative testing. (See 'Which children require
evaluation?' above and 'Interpretation of results' above.)
● The cutoff level of "normal" is arbitrary and may depend on the specific provocative
agent used.
● The interpretation of the test results depends upon age and sex hormone
concentrations [56]. Children with constitutional delay of growth and puberty may have
low GH results on provocative testing in the absence of true GHD (ie, false-positive
results). Administration of sex steroids for a few days prior to the provocative GH
testing (known as "priming") reduces the chance of a false-positive result, as discussed
below.
● Adiposity (as measured by body mass index) also influences GH response to the
stimulation test, such that obese children show diminished GH responses to all stimuli
[55,57,58].
● The ability of the tests to discriminate between normal short children and children with
partial GHD is limited.
Because of these limitations, it is clear that there is no real "gold standard" for the diagnosis
of GHD [34]. Nonetheless, GH stimulation testing is a valuable diagnostic tool when
combined with auxologic data and measurements of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3. The peak GH
response to provocative testing is also a useful predictor of response during the first year of
treatment with GH [59,60].
● General protocol – The stimulation tests are performed after an overnight fast. After
the pharmacologic agent is administered, serum samples are collected at intervals
designed to capture the peak stimulated GH level; the expected time to this peak varies
Some clinicians also measure a baseline GH level as part of the stimulation test. If that
level is relatively high (eg, between 5 and 10 mcg/L), this suggests that GHD is unlikely
and that subsequent GH values after stimulation, even if the values are all <10 mcg/L,
may not necessarily reflect true GHD.
● Choice of stimulus – There is general consensus that two different stimuli should be
used for most patients [54,55]. In a patient with known pathology of the central
nervous system, other pituitary hormone defects, or a genetic defect, one test is
sufficient to establish the diagnosis [34,64]. The pharmacologic stimulants that have
the highest specificity (fewest false-positive results) and are most commonly used
clinically are:
(maximum 1 mg), and serum samples are drawn at intervals between one and three
hours after the stimulus. Peak GH secretion occurs between two and three hours
after glucagon administration; side effects are mild and transient and include
nausea, vomiting, sweating, or headaches.
Arginine, glucagon, and insulin also provide information about the hypothalamic-
pituitary-adrenal axis.
Macimorelin acetate is used for testing adults with suspected GHD, but there are no
data in the pediatric population. The performance of this and other provocative tests is
discussed separately. (See "Growth hormone deficiency in adults", section on
'Provocative tests'.)
● Sex steroid priming – Administration of sex steroids prior to the GH stimulation test
(known as "priming") increases the response to the stimulus and diminishes the
possibility of a false diagnosis of GHD [74]. The clinical utility of priming has not been
fully established, but guidelines recommend priming before provocative GH testing in
prepubertal boys older than 11 years and prepubertal girls older than 10 years [55].
Priming is most useful for otherwise healthy patients with mild growth failure (eg,
predicted adult height within -2 SD of the mean) because it may reduce false-positive
results for GH stimulation testing and thus help distinguish mild GHD from
constitutional delay of growth and puberty.
If the child is also hypothyroid, the tests of GH secretion should be postponed until
thyroxine is adequately replaced. GH secretion may be subnormal merely as a result of
the hypothyroidism. Thus, hypothyroidism should be excluded before performing GH
stimulation tests. (See 'Diagnostic approach' above.)
After the clinical and biochemical diagnosis of GHD is made, it is essential to obtain an MRI
of the brain with narrow cuts through the hypothalamic-pituitary area [34]. This imaging is
important to exclude the possibility of a pituitary tumor; it also permits diagnostic
characterization by showing the presence or absence of morphologic abnormalities such as
anterior pituitary hypoplasia, pituitary stalk agenesis, and posterior pituitary ectopia.
An MRI is helpful in the prediction of permanent GHD. In one study, GH secretion was
reevaluated after completion of GH treatment in young adults with childhood-onset GHD
[77]. GHD was permanent in children with congenital hypothalamic-pituitary abnormalities
on MRI scans, while children without hypothalamic-pituitary abnormalities frequently
showed normalization of GH secretion at the completion of GH treatment.
An MRI may also provide evidence of severe GHD if the diagnosis of pituitary stalk
interruption syndrome is made [77]. This entity consists of ectopic neurohypophysis,
interrupted pituitary stalk, and hypoplastic adenohypophysis and has been associated with
severe GHD.
If an MRI is not available, computed tomography (CT) of the head is sufficient to screen for a
pituitary tumor.
The classic GH insensitivity syndrome is also known as Laron syndrome (formerly, Laron
dwarfism), in which mutations of the GH receptor cause severe postnatal growth failure.
Lesser degrees of GH resistance may play a role in a small percentage of cases of idiopathic
short stature [78] (see "Growth hormone treatment for idiopathic short stature", section on
'Dose adjustment for IGF-1 levels'). This disorder is discussed in a separate topic review. (See
"Growth hormone insensitivity syndromes".)
Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions
around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Growth hormone
deficiency and other growth disorders".)
UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the
Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th
grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have
about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview
and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are
longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th
grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are
comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to
print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles
on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)
● Candidates for evaluation – GHD should be suspected in patients with marked short
stature (more than 2.5 standard deviations [SD] below the mean) and/or marked
growth failure (height velocity less than the 25th percentile for age), or more moderate
degrees of short stature and growth failure with decelerating growth (without
alternative explanation). It should also be suspected in children with signs or
symptoms of hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction with decelerating growth. (See 'Which
children require evaluation?' above.)
• Clinical evaluation – The first step is to evaluate for causes of growth failure other
than GHD, including chronic systemic disease, hypothyroidism, Turner syndrome (in
girls), and skeletal disorders. This is accomplished through a thorough medical
history and physical examination. Laboratory evaluation should be performed when
appropriate. (See 'Which children require evaluation?' above and "Diagnostic
approach to children and adolescents with short stature".)
• Initial testing – Patients with suspected GHD should be screened with radiographic
measurement of bone age, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and insulin-like
growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3). We interpret the results of IGF-1 and
IGFBP-3 testing as follows (see 'Interpretation of results' above):
- Clearly normal IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 (SD ≥0; ie, in the upper one-half of the normal
range) – GHD is extremely unlikely, and no further testing is required.
- Somewhat low IGF-1 (eg, SD between 0 and -2) and IGFBP-3 – Moderate
suspicion of GHD. The decision about whether to perform provocative GH
testing depends on individual patient characteristics, including the severity of
growth failure, degree of bone age delay, and whether the low levels of IGF-1
and IGFBP-3 can be explained by other factors, such as poor nutrition.
- Moderately or severely reduced IGF-1 (eg, SD <-2) and IGFBP-3 with delayed
bone age – Strong suspicion of GHD. In most cases, the possibility of GHD
should be explored by provocative GH testing, if other causes of low IGF-1 and
IGFBP-3, such as poor nutrition, have been excluded. (See 'Growth hormone
stimulation tests' above.)
GH stimulation testing is not necessary for selected patients in whom other clinical
criteria are sufficient to make the diagnosis of GHD, including those with a known
pituitary abnormality (congenital anomaly, tumor, or irradiation) and known
https://www-uptodate-com.bibliotecavirtual.udla.edu.ec/contents/diagnosis-of-growth-hormone-deficiency-in-children/print?search=growth horm… 14/33
8/8/23, 13:45 Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children - UpToDate
deficiency of at least one other pituitary hormone, with marked growth failure. (See
'Indications' above.)
REFERENCES
1. RABEN MS. Treatment of a pituitary dwarf with human growth hormone. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 1958; 18:901.
2. Rona RJ, Tanner JM. Aetiology of idiopathic growth hormone deficiency in England and
Wales. Arch Dis Child 1977; 52:197.
3. Murray PG, Dattani MT, Clayton PE. Controversies in the diagnosis and management of
growth hormone deficiency in childhood and adolescence. Arch Dis Child 2016; 101:96.
4. Human growth hormone (somatotropin) for the treatment of growth failure in children,
NICE, 2010. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/TA188 (Accessed on January 05, 2016).
9. Rogol AD, Hayden GF. Etiologies and early diagnosis of short stature and growth failure
in children and adolescents. J Pediatr 2014; 164:S1.
10. Pérez Jurado LA, Argente J. Molecular basis of familial growth hormone deficiency. Horm
Res 1994; 42:189.
11. Phillips JA 3rd, Cogan JD. Genetic basis of endocrine disease. 6. Molecular basis of
familial human growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994; 78:11.
12. Mangalam HJ, Albert VR, Ingraham HA, et al. A pituitary POU domain protein, Pit-1,
activates both growth hormone and prolactin promoters transcriptionally. Genes Dev
1989; 3:946.
13. Li S, Crenshaw EB 3rd, Rawson EJ, et al. Dwarf locus mutants lacking three pituitary cell
types result from mutations in the POU-domain gene pit-1. Nature 1990; 347:528.
14. Cohen LE, Wondisford FE, Salvatoni A, et al. A "hot spot" in the Pit-1 gene responsible for
combined pituitary hormone deficiency: clinical and molecular correlates. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 1995; 80:679.
15. Pellegrini-Bouiller I, Bélicar P, Barlier A, et al. A new mutation of the gene encoding the
transcription factor Pit-1 is responsible for combined pituitary hormone deficiency. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 1996; 81:2790.
16. Takagi M, Kamasaki H, Yagi H, et al. A novel heterozygous intronic mutation in POU1F1
is associated with combined pituitary hormone deficiency. Endocr J 2017; 64:229.
17. Sobrier ML, Tsai YC, Pérez C, et al. Functional characterization of a human POU1F1
mutation associated with isolated growth hormone deficiency: a novel etiology for
IGHD. Hum Mol Genet 2016; 25:472.
18. Wu W, Cogan JD, Pfäffle RW, et al. Mutations in PROP1 cause familial combined pituitary
hormone deficiency. Nat Genet 1998; 18:147.
22. Kelberman D, Dattani MT. The role of transcription factors implicated in anterior
pituitary development in the aetiology of congenital hypopituitarism. Ann Med 2006;
38:560.
23. Diaczok D, Romero C, Zunich J, et al. A novel dominant negative mutation of OTX2
associated with combined pituitary hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;
93:4351.
24. Tajima T, Ishizu K, Nakamura A. Molecular and Clinical Findings in Patients with LHX4
and OTX2 Mutations. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol 2013; 22:15.
25. Arnhold IJ, França MM, Carvalho LR, et al. Role of GLI2 in hypopituitarism phenotype. J
Mol Endocrinol 2015; 54:R141.
26. Madeira JL, Jorge AA, Martin RM, et al. A homozygous point mutation in the GH1
promoter (c.-223C>T) leads to reduced GH1 expression in siblings with isolated GH
deficiency (IGHD). Eur J Endocrinol 2016; 175:K7.
27. Takahashi Y, Kaji H, Okimura Y, et al. Brief report: short stature caused by a mutant
growth hormone. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:432.
28. Besson A, Salemi S, Deladoëy J, et al. Short stature caused by a biologically inactive
mutant growth hormone (GH-C53S). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90:2493.
29. Wit JM, van Unen H. Growth of infants with neonatal growth hormone deficiency. Arch
Dis Child 1992; 67:920.
30. Gluckman PD, Gunn AJ, Wray A, et al. Congenital idiopathic growth hormone deficiency
associated with prenatal and early postnatal growth failure. The International Board of
the Kabi Pharmacia International Growth Study. J Pediatr 1992; 121:920.
31. De Luca F, Bernasconi S, Blandino A, et al. Auxological, clinical and neuroradiological
findings in infants with early onset growth hormone deficiency. Acta Paediatr 1995;
84:561.
33. Kärkinen J, Miettinen PJ, Raivio T, Hero M. Etiology of severe short stature below -3 SDS
in a screened Finnish population. Eur J Endocrinol 2020; 183:481.
34. Growth Hormone Research Society. Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and
treatment of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in childhood and adolescence: summary
statement of the GH Research Society. GH Research Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2000; 85:3990.
35. Osterstock G, Escobar P, Mitutsova V, et al. Ghrelin stimulation of growth hormone-
releasing hormone neurons is direct in the arcuate nucleus. PLoS One 2010; 5:e9159.
36. Martha PM Jr, Rogol AD, Veldhuis JD, et al. Alterations in the pulsatile properties of
circulating growth hormone concentrations during puberty in boys. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab 1989; 69:563.
37. Rosenfeld RG. Biochemical diagnostic strategies in the evaluation of short stature: the
diagnosis of insulin-like growth factor deficiency. Horm Res 1996; 46:170.
38. Underwood LE. Clinical uses of IGF-1 and IGF binding protein assays. In: The IGF System:
Molecular Biology, Physiology, and Clinical Applications, Rosenfeld RG, Roberts CT (Eds),
Human Press Inc., New Jersey 1999. p.617.
39. Hasegawa Y, Hasegawa T, Aso T, et al. Comparison between insulin-like growth factor-I
(IGF-I) and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) measurement in the diagnosis of growth
hormone deficiency. Endocr J 1993; 40:185.
40. Nunez SB, Municchi G, Barnes KM, Rose SR. Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-
binding protein-3 concentrations compared to stimulated and night growth hormone in
the evaluation of short children--a clinical research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1996; 81:1927.
41. Bancos I, Algeciras-Schimnich A, Grebe SK, et al. Evaluation of Variables Influencing the
Measurement of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1. Endocr Pract 2014; 20:421.
42. Stanley TL, Feldpausch MN, Murphy CA, et al. Discordance of IGF-1 and GH stimulation
testing for altered GH secretion in obesity. Growth Horm IGF Res 2014; 24:10.
46. Powell DR, Rosenfeld RG, Baker BK, et al. Serum somatomedin levels in adults with
chronic renal failure: the importance of measuring insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and
IGF-II in acid-chromatographed uremic serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1986; 63:1186.
47. Chinceşan MI, Mărginean O, Pitea AM, Dobreanu M. Relationship of serum insulin-like
growth factor I (IGF-I) with nutritional status in pediatric patients with malignant
diseases--a single Romanian center experience. Eur J Pediatr 2013; 172:1401.
48. Rosenfeld RG, Lamson G, Pham H, et al. Insulinlike growth factor-binding proteins.
Recent Prog Horm Res 1990; 46:99.
49. Lamson G, Giudice LC, Rosenfeld RG. Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins:
structural and molecular relationships. Growth Factors 1991; 5:19.
50. Baxter RC, Martin JL. Binding proteins for the insulin-like growth factors: structure,
regulation and function. Prog Growth Factor Res 1989; 1:49.
52. Bhala A, Harris MC, Zirin S, et al. Insulin-like growth factor axis parameters in sick
hospitalized neonates. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 1998; 11:451.
53. Examples of reference ranges from commonly used laboratories are available in the Int
erpretive Guide from Quest (www.questdiagnostics.com/hcp/index.html), or the Expecte
d Values manual from Esoterix (www.esoterix.com/prodserv/test_menu/endocrinology.a
sp) www.questdiagnostics.com/hcp/index.html; www.esoterix.com/prodserv/test_men
u/endocrinology.asp (Accessed on October 15, 2008).
54. Collett-Solberg PF, Ambler G, Backeljauw PF, et al. Diagnosis, Genetics, and Therapy of
Short Stature in Children: A Growth Hormone Research Society International
Perspective. Horm Res Paediatr 2019; 92:1.
55. Grimberg A, DiVall SA, Polychronakos C, et al. Guidelines for Growth Hormone and
Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Treatment in Children and Adolescents: Growth Hormone
Deficiency, Idiopathic Short Stature, and Primary Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Deficiency.
Horm Res Paediatr 2016; 86:361.
56. Price DA. GH testing in KIGS: The clinical reality. In: Growth Hormone Therapy in KIGS-10
Years' Experience, Ranke MB, Wilton P (Eds), Huthig GmbH, Heidelberg-Leipzig, German
y 1999. p.73.
57. Lee HS, Hwang JS. Influence of body mass index on growth hormone responses to
classic provocative tests in children with short stature. Neuroendocrinology 2011;
93:259.
58. Stanley TL, Levitsky LL, Grinspoon SK, Misra M. Effect of body mass index on peak
growth hormone response to provocative testing in children with short stature. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94:4875.
59. Cole TJ, Hindmarsh PC, Dunger DB. Growth hormone (GH) provocation tests and the
response to GH treatment in GH deficiency. Arch Dis Child 2004; 89:1024.
60. Cohen P, Rogol AD, Howard CP, et al. Insulin growth factor-based dosing of growth
hormone therapy in children: a randomized, controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2007; 92:2480.
61. Ranke MB. Growth hormone deficiency: Diagnostic principles and practice. In: Diagnosti
cs of endocrine function in children and adolescents, 4th ed, Ranke MB, Mullis P-E (Eds),
Karger, Basel 2011. p.102.
62. Wagner IV, Paetzold C, Gausche R, et al. Clinical evidence-based cutoff limits for GH
stimulation tests in children with a backup of results with reference to mass
spectrometry. Eur J Endocrinol 2014; 171:389.
64. Richmond EJ, Rogol AD. Growth hormone deficiency in children. Pituitary 2008; 11:115.
66. Fraser NC, Seth J, Brown NS. Clonidine is a better test for growth hormone deficiency
than insulin hypoglycaemia. Arch Dis Child 1983; 58:355.
67. Al Khalifah R, Moisan L, Bui H. The shortened combined clonidine and arginine test for
growth hormone deficiency is practical and specific: a diagnostic accuracy study. J
Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2016; 29:305.
69. Mitchell ML, Byrne MJ, Sanchez Y, Sawin CT. Detection of growth-hormone deficiency. N
Engl J Med 1970; 282:539.
70. Leong KS, Walker AB, Martin I, et al. An audit of 500 subcutaneous glucagon stimulation
tests to assess growth hormone and ACTH secretion in patients with hypothalamic-
pituitary disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2001; 54:463.
71. Kaplan SL, Abrams CA, Bell JJ, et al. Growth and growth hormone. I. Changes in serum
level of growth hormone following hypoglycemia in 134 children with growth
retardation. Pediatr Res 1968; 2:43.
72. Root AW, Rosenfield RL, Bongiovanni AM, Eberlein WR. The plasma growth hormone
response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in children with retardation of growth.
Pediatrics 1967; 39:844.
73. Raiti S, Davis WT, Blizzard RM. A comparison of the effects of insulin hypoglycaemia and
arginine infusion on release of human growth hormone. Lancet 1967; 2:1182.
74. Marin G, Domené HM, Barnes KM, et al. The effects of estrogen priming and puberty on
the growth hormone response to standardized treadmill exercise and arginine-insulin in
normal girls and boys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994; 79:537.
75. Maghnie M, Salati B, Bianchi S, et al. Relationship between the morphological evaluation
of the pituitary and the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone Plus
arginine in children and adults with congenital hypopituitarism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2001; 86:1574.
76. Dietrich RB, Lis LE, Greensite FS, Pitt D. Normal MR appearance of the pituitary gland in
the first 2 years of life. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16:1413.
77. Maghnie M, Strigazzi C, Tinelli C, et al. Growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) of
childhood onset: reassessment of GH status and evaluation of the predictive criteria for
permanent GHD in young adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84:1324.
78. David A, Hwa V, Metherell LA, et al. Evidence for a continuum of genetic, phenotypic,
and biochemical abnormalities in children with growth hormone insensitivity. Endocr
https://www-uptodate-com.bibliotecavirtual.udla.edu.ec/contents/diagnosis-of-growth-hormone-deficiency-in-children/print?search=growth horm… 20/33
8/8/23, 13:45 Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children - UpToDate
GRAPHICS
Reproduced from: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention based on data from the WHO Child Growth
Standards.
Reproduced from: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention based on data from the WHO Child Growth
Standards.
From National Health Center for Health Statistics in collaboration with the National Center for Chronic
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2000).
From National Health Center for Health Statistics in collaboration with the National Center for Chronic
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2000).
Height velocity by age for American males. The main set of curves (black lines)
is centered on the population with average timing of peak growth velocity
(around 13.5 years for males) and show an approximate trajectory for
individual children with this average pubertal timing. The 2 other curves
outline a trajectory (50 th percentile) for a child with "early" (solid blue) or "late"
(solid orange) timing of peak growth velocity.
Other height velocity curves have been developed that reflect population
averages (eg, Kelly A, JCEM 2014, not shown here). Those curves are
substantially flatter than the trajectory followed by any individual patient. They
are based on data from a more recent and ethnically diverse population of
children and are valuable for understanding overall growth patterns in the
Reproduced with permission from: Tanner JM, Davies S. Clinical longitudinal standards for height and
height velocity for North American children. J Pediatr 1985; 107:317. Copyright © 1985 Elsevier.
Height velocity by age for American females. The main set of curves (black
lines) is centered on the population with average timing of peak growth
velocity (around 11.5 years for females) and show an approximate trajectory
for individual children with this average pubertal timing. The 2 other curves
outline a trajectory (50 th percentile) for a child with "early" (solid blue) or "late"
(solid orange) timing of peak growth velocity.
Other height velocity curves have been developed that reflect population
averages (eg, Kelly A, JCEM 2014, not shown here). Those curves are
substantially flatter than the trajectory followed by any individual patient. They
are based on data from a more recent and ethnically diverse population of
children and are valuable for understanding overall growth patterns in the
Reproduced with permission from: Tanner JM, Davies S. Clinical longitudinal standards for height and
height velocity for North American children. J Pediatr 1985; 107:317. Copyright © 1985 Elsevier.
Reproducibility in both normal and abnormal children is poor, even when the same test is
performed
Nutritional adequacy and body composition (particularly, adiposity) can affect response
There is no standard serum growth hormone assay, and there are large interassay variations
among the assays in use
Contributor Disclosures
Erick J Richmond, MD Speaker's Bureau: Merck [Growth hormone]; NovoNordisk [Growth hormone];
Pfizer [Growth hormone]; Sandoz [Growth hormone]. All of the relevant financial relationships listed
have been mitigated. Alan D Rogol, MD, PhD Consultant/Advisory Boards: Anteres [Androgens];
Ascendis [Growth]; BioMarin [Growth]; Comprehensive Drug Testing [Anti-doping]; Lumos [Growth];
Pfizer [Growth]; Tolmar [Growth and androgens]; United States Anti-Doping Agency [Anti-doping];
World Anti-Doping Agency [Anti-doping]. All of the relevant financial relationships listed have been
mitigated. Mitchell E Geffner, MD Grant/Research/Clinical Trial Support: Adrenas [Congenital adrenal
hyperplasia]; Diurnal [Congenital adrenal hyperplasia]; Neurocrine Biosciences [Congenital adrenal
hyperplasia]; Novo Nordisk [Growth]; Spruce Biosciences [Congenital adrenal hyperplasia].
Consultant/Advisory Boards: Adrenas [Congenital adrenal hyperplasia]; Aeterna Zentaris [Growth];
Eton [Congenital adrenal hyperplasia]; Neurocrine Biosciences [Congenital adrenal hyperplasia]; Novo
Nordisk [Growth]; Nutritional Growth Solutions [Growth]; Pfizer [Growth]; Spruce Biosciences
[Congenital adrenal hyperplasia]. Other Financial Interest: McGraw-Hill textbook royalties [Pediatric
endocrinology]. All of the relevant financial relationships listed have been mitigated. Alison G Hoppin,
MD No relevant financial relationship(s) with ineligible companies to disclose.
Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these
are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for
references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all
authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.