Test Simulation 25.09
Test Simulation 25.09
MISSING PARAGRAPHS
A. Finally, the reform of early education started in 2009 and was continued until 2015. It introduced
compulsory education for 5-year-olds and extended the right to a preschool education to 3- and 4-year-
olds. Overall, the reforms expanded the length of compulsory comprehensive education from 8 to 10 years.
B. The general level of literacy has been uplifted significantly. In 1990, more than one-third of students
went into basic vocational education. Now the figure is less than 10%.
C. While there exists a widespread notion that an expansion of tertiary education is associated with a
lowering of its quality, the market premium for a tertiary education diploma in Poland is comparable to the
average across the EU or OECD countries.
D. Before the first PISA study was conducted in 2000, there was not a single standardized assessment
conducted in Poland that measured student knowledge and skills. The national examinations and university
entrance exams were not standardized. The exam at the end of secondary education has the same set of
questions for all students, but the results were evaluated differently in each school.
E. The constitutional body underwent changes to be more democratic. Meanwhile, the first changes in
education focused on disinheriting communism and decentralization with the ministry playing the key role.
These efforts were, however, underfunded and unsuccessful for another decade.
F. Such compelling evidence bears witness to the Poland’s success in renovating its educational system.
The goal initially set out had been achieved, to a certain extent. Nevertheless, as the nation’s ministry of
education stated, it is now undergoing another revolutionary phase of adjustments.
G. the PIAAC assessments of adults show that only the youngest cohorts perform at or above the OECD
average. In Europe, Poland is currently among the top performers in international assessment rankings.
H. For politically minded commentators, the education reforms in Poland were inconsistent and did not
lead to substantial improvements. However, more careful analyses of policy objectives and outcomes
suggest the opposite. Despite differences in opinion and the usual politics, the education reforms had one
overarching idea behind them: to expand comprehensive education so as to provide learning opportunities
for all students.
Part 4. Read the following passage and do the tasks that follow.
Unfair Education
In a country where government and families alike are tightening their belts and trying to make do with
less, you could be pardoned for thinking that private education would be in a bit of a jam right now. And yet,
although fees at independent schools in Britain have approximately doubled over the last two and a half
decades, pupil numbers are the highest since records started in 1974.
Although there are numerous reasons why parents might choose to fork out an average of £12,500 per
year on their child’s education, there is one which stands out more than any other: their reputation for
getting their students into elite universities, such as the American Ivy League colleges and Britain’s most
prestigious universities: Oxford and Cambridge. Private schools with experience in these admissions
processes run like well-oiled machines. Their informed careers advisers have in-depth tactical knowledge
of which colleges would best suit each candidate, and help them to edit their personal statements to reflect
the qualities that elite universities are looking for. Interview training sessions guide young applicants
through an interview system which has been described as being ‘more reminiscent of an old-boy network
than justice for society’. Those with family members and teachers who have successfully gone through the
admissions process are at a considerable advantage to those who are the first to apply among their social
group.
Consequently, the social mix of students at the top universities remains sadly biased towards the rich
and privately educated – although thanks to increasing numbers of bursaries providing free private school
education to academically gifted youngsters, it is possible to be one without the other. Even so, the fact is
that 7% of British children go to private schools, while more than 40% of the intake at Oxford and
Cambridge is privately educated, and this statistic depicts a worryingly skewed trend.
The proportion matters because, although there are obviously plenty of other universities offering
excellent study programmes, an Oxbridge or Ivy-League degree undoubtedly enhances employability in the
ruling professions. According to recent studies by the UK educational charity The Sutton Trust, over 30% of
leading professionals in the United Kingdom, including almost 80% of lawyers, 47% of highflyers in financial
services and 41% of top journalists attended Oxford or Cambridge. Every university-educated Prime
Minister since 1937 except one, Gordon Brown, is an alumnus of one or the other, as are approximately
two-thirds of the current government cabinet.
This bias is bad news not only for the clever but underprivileged students who have to settle for a less
renowned university; it is bad news for Britain, as decisions that affect the whole nation are made by a
select group with a narrow pool of experience, rather than one that is representative of society as a whole.
This disproportion was brought to public attention in 2000, when politician Gordon Brown launched an
attack on the selection processes at Oxford University. He publicised the story of Laura Spence, a gifted
student who had the “best A-level qualifications you can have”, but nevertheless was turned down by
Magdalen College, Oxford. Later, Member of Parliament David Lammy used the freedom of information act
to examine admissions data at Oxford and Cambridge Universities, and found that almost 90% of the
student body at both universities was drawn from the upper and middle classes, that in 2009 Oxford
accepted only one British black Caribbean undergraduate, and it focused its attentions on admissions
events at private schools such as Kate Middleton’s school, Marlborough College, and Prince William’s alma
mater, Eton.
Since then, universities have been forced to up their game welcoming the less privileged among their
students. Quotas have been put into place to ensure that the colleges admit a larger proportion of less
privileged students. These targets are not often met, however, and they have brought about a new practice
in which parents privately educate their children up to the age of 16, giving them a sound academic
background, then put them in state education for their two final years, to better improve their chances of
being accepted at a top university as part of their ‘less privileged’ quota.
Even so, Oxford now spends $4 million a year on student outreach, a $1.6 million increase since 2006–
07. Much of this is spent on school visits and teacher-training programmes aimed at supporting poor and
minority students who wish to apply to the university. The university has also launched a summer school,
which allows around 500 academically talented, state-school students a chance to experience studying at
Oxford for a week. And yet these strategies depend on state schools being able to educate students to the
same level as private schools; where stringent selection processes, partnered with high budgets, parental
support and top-class facilities allow schools to spew out students of an impressively high academic
calibre. State schools have much less opportunity to do this. Or have they? One commentator argues that
the success of private schools is not in their money, but in their organisation. State schools fail their pupils
because, under government control, they lack options. But if head teachers at state schools were given the
same freedom as those at private schools, namely to sack poor teachers and pay more to good ones,
parents would not need to send their children to private schools any more.
For questions 1-7, decide whether the following statements are True (T), False (F) or Not Given
(NG).
1. Numbers of pupils at private schools have doubled since 1975.
2. On average, the cost of tuition at a private school in the UK is £12,500 per child, per year.
3. The interview process at elite universities gives private and state-educated students an equal
chance of success.
4. All students at private schools in Britain come from rich families.
5. Most leading politicians and judges in the UK were educated at Oxford or Cambridge University.
6. Former prime minister Gordon Brown was educated at to Oxford University.
7. Both Kate Middleton and Prince William applied to Oxford University.
For questions 8-13, read the following sentences and fill in each blank with NO MORE THAN FOUR
WORDS taken from the passage.
One study found that nearly nine tenths of students entering Oxford and Cambridge universities came from
the (8) __________. Universities must now adhere to (9) __________ to ensure that they admit a socio-
economic mix of students. This has led to parents choosing to educate their children in (10) __________ to
increase their chances of getting into an elite university. Oxford’s (11) __________ programme has been
expanded to attract the less privileged. However, private schools can educate students to a higher standard
because they have more money and they employ strict (12) __________ . However, one commentator
believes that state schools would do better if their head teachers were allowed more (13) __________.
Part 5. The passage below consists of seven paragraphs (A-G). For questions 1-10, read the
passage and do the tasks that follow. Write your answers in the corresponding numbered boxes
provided.
A. Children in developing countries are healthier and more likely to survive past the age of five when their
mothers can read and write. Experts in public health accepted this idea decades ago, but until now no one
has been able to show that a woman's ability to read in itself improves her children’s chances of survival.
B. Most literate women learnt to read in primary school, and the fact that a woman has had an education
may simply indicate her family’s wealth or that it values its children more highly. Now a long-term study
carried out in Nicaragua has eliminated these factors by showing that teaching reading to poor adult
women, who would otherwise have remained illiterate, has a direct effect on their children’s health and
survival.
C. In 1979, the government of Nicaragua established a number of social programmes, including a National
Literacy Crusade. By 1985, about 300,000 illiterate adults from all over the country, many of whom had
never attended primary school, had learnt how to read, write and use numbers.
D. During this period, researchers from the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, the Central American
Institute of Health in Nicaragua, the National Autonomous University of Nicaragua and the Costa Rican
Institute of Health interviewed nearly 3,000 women, some of whom had learnt to read as children, some
during the literacy crusade and some who had never learnt at all. The women were asked how many
children they had given birth to and how many of them had died in infancy. The research teams also
examined the surviving children to find out how well-nourished they were.
E. The investigators' findings were striking. In the late 1970s, the infant mortality rate for the children of
illiterate mothers was around 110 deaths per thousand live births. At this point in their lives, those mothers
who later went on to learn to read had a similar level of child mortality (105/1000). For women educated in
primary school, however, the infant mortality rate was significantly lower, at 80 per thousand.
F. In 1985, after the National Literacy Crusade had ended, the infant mortality figures for those who
remained illiterate and for those educated in primary school remained more or less unchanged. For those
women who learnt to read through the campaign, the infant mortality rate was 84 per thousand, an
impressive 21 points lower than for those women who were still illiterate. The children of the newly-literate
mothers were also better nourished than those of women who could not read.
G. Why are the children of literate mothers better off? According to Peter Sandiford of the Liverpool School
of Tropical Medicine, no one knows for certain. Child health was not on the curriculum during the women’s
lessons, so he and his colleagues are looking at other factors. They are working with the same group of
3,000 women, to try to find out whether reading mothers make better use of hospitals and clinics, opt for
smaller families, exert more control at home, learn modern childcare techniques more quickly, or whether
they merely have more respect for themselves and their children.
Which paragraph mentions the following?
1. a change in direction for research
2. a multilateral research undertaking
3. the findings remaining static over time
4. the input of the study
5. a popular notion unexplained
6. the far-reaching implications of a project
7. women of different groups showing different results
8. a study re-using the samples from previous ones
9. mothers’ literacy having implications other than child welfare
10. the level of literacy of some men partaking in the study
IV. WRITING
Part 2. The tables below show how many international students studies in Canada and the United
States by origin. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant. You should write about 150 words.
Part 3: Write an essay of 350 words on the following topics:
3.1 Gifted students are not just those who are knowledgeable but rather they are people who can use
knowledge to solve specific problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
3.2 Students should be assessed on a self-selecting set of skills and knowledge; to suggest the contrary
would be unnecessary or counter-productive.
Discuss the statement and give your opinion.
V. SPEAKING
5.1 The study of humanities and social science are often looked down on by our society as opposed to the
STEM science and mathematics. What can be the causes of this? What solutions can be implemented?
5.2 Our society now urges students to be more active in the schooling environment. This has caused a
change in the role of teachers. Do you think teachers are now redundant? Why/Why not?
5.3 “Tell me and I’ll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I’ll understand.” How do you, as
a student, interpret this proverb?
5.4 Students now have a variety of educational paths to choose from. What factors can affect this choice?
Is it a positive or negative effect?
5.5 “Competitions are the driving force behind peer pressure as well as dishonesty in education. Therefore,
all competitions should be eliminated.” To what extent do you agree or disagree?