MODULE 5

Collection of Solid Waste

 Lecture 13
Analysis of collection system (Part III)
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE HAULED CONTAINER AND STATIONARY CONTAINER SYSTEM

 Problem statement

 A private solid waste collector wishes to locate MRF near a commercial area.

 The collector would like to use a hauled container system but fears that the haul costs might be
prohibitive.

 What is the maximum distance away from the commercial area that the MRF can be located so
that weekly costs of the hauled container system do not exceed those of the stationary container ?

 Assume that one collector-driven vehicle will be used in each system.

 For the purpose of this example assume the travel times t1 and t2 are included in the off-route factor.
 Assume the following data will be applicable
1. Hauled Container system 2. Stationary Container system
a) Quantity of solid wastes = 230 m3/wk a) Quantity of solid wastes = 230 m3/wk
b) Container size = 6 m3/trip b) Container size = 6 m3/location
c) Container utilization factor = 0.67 c) Container utilization factor = 0.67
d) Container pickup time = 0.33 h/trip d) Collection vehicle capacity = 23 m3/trip
e) Haul time constants: a= 0.022 h/trip and b = 0.014 h/km e) Collection vehicle compaction ratio = 2
f) At-site time (s) = 0.053 h/trip f) Container unloading time = 0.05 h/container
g) Overhead costs = ₹28464 per week g) Haul time constants: a= 0.022 h/trip and b = 0.014 h/km
h) Operational Costs = ₹1067 per hour of operation h) At-site time (s) = 0.01 h/trip

3. Location characteristics i) Overhead costs = ₹53370 per week

a) Average distance between container locations = 0.16 km j) Operational costs = ₹1423 per hour of operation
b) Constants for estimating driving time between container locations for both haul and stationary container systems are:
a = 0.060 h/trip and b = 0.042 h/km
Solution :
1. Hauled Container system
(a) Determining the number of trips per week
Weekly quantity of waste collected 𝑉𝑤 230
Nw = = =
(Average container size)(Container utilization factor) 𝑐𝑓 6 × 0.67

= 57 trips/wk
(b) Estimating the average pickup time for the hauled container system
Phcs = pc + uc + dbc
= pc + uc + a + bx
= 0.033 + 0.033 + 0.060 + 0.042(0.16) [given]
= 0.133 h/trip

pc = time required to pick up loaded container (h/trip)

uc = time required to pick up empty container (h/trip)
dbc = time required to drive between container location (h/trip)
(c) Estimate the time required per week (Tw )as a function of the round trip haul distance

𝑁𝑤 (𝑃ℎ𝑐𝑠 + 𝑠 + 𝑎 + 𝑏𝑥) 57 ( 0.133 + 0.053 + 0.022 + 0.014𝑥)

Tw = =
𝐻(1 − 𝑊) 8(1 − 0.15)
= 1.74 + 0.12 x d/wk
(d) Determining the weekly operational cost as a function of round trip haul distance

Operational cost = (Operational cost per hour) (Daily total hours of operation) [Time required per week (Tw(hcs) )]

= (₹1067/h) (8h/d) [(1.74 + (0.12/km)(x)] d/wk

=14582.64 + 1024.32 (x) (₹/wk)

Overhead cost = 28464 (₹/wk) (given)

Total cost (₹/wk) = Operational cost + Overhead cost

= 14582.64 + 1024.32 (x) + 28464

∴ Total costhcs (₹/wk) = 43046.64 + 1024.32 (x)

2. Stationary Container system:
a) Determining the number of containers emptied per trip
(volume of collection vehicle) (compaction ratio) 𝑣𝑟 23 × 2
Ct = = =
(container volume) (container utilization factor) 𝑐𝑓 6 × 0.67

= 11.44

Use 11 containers/trip

b) Estimating the pickup time per container

Pscs = Ct (uc) + (np-1) dbc

= Ct (uc) + (np-1) (a + bx)

= 11 × 0.050 + 11 − 1 0.060 + 0.042 × 0.16

= 1.22 h/trip
c) Determining the no. of trips required per week

Weekly quantity of waste collected

Nw =
(volume of collection vehicle) (compaction ratio)

𝑉𝑤 230
= =
𝑣𝑟 23 × 2
= 5 trips/wk.

d) Estimate the time required per week, Tw, as a function of the round trip haul distance

𝑁𝑤 × 𝑃𝑠𝑐𝑠 + 𝑡𝑤 (𝑠 + 𝑎 + 𝑏𝑥) 5 × 1.22 + 5(0.01 + 0.022 + 0.014𝑥)

Tw(scs) = =
𝐻(1 − 𝑊) 8(1 − 0.15)

= 0.92 + 0.01x d/wk

e) Determining the weekly operational cost as a function of round trip haul distance

Operational cost = (Operational cost per hour) (daily total hours of operation) [Time required per week (Tw(scs) )]

= (₹1423/h) (8h/d) [(0.92 + (0.01/km)(x)] d/wk

=10473.28 + 113.84x (₹/wk)

Overhead cost = 53370 (₹/wk) (given)

Total cost (₹/wk) = Operational cost + Overhead cost

= 10473.28 + 113.84x + 53370

∴ Total costscs (₹/wk) = 63843.28 + 113.84 (x)

3. Comparison of the systems

 The weekly total costs for HCS and SCS have been calculated below for round trip haul distance (x) 0, 1,
5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 27

Round Trip Haul Distance (𝑥), Haul Container System (₹/wk) Stationary Container System (₹/wk)
km
Total costhcs = 43046.64 + 1024.32 (x) Total costscs = 63843.28 + 113.84 (x)
0 43046.64 63843.28
1 44070.96 63957.12
5 48168.24 64412.48
10 53289.84 64981.68
15 58411.44 65550.88
20 63533.04 66120.08
25 68654.64 66689.28
27 70703.28 66916.96
The required plot is given below:

75000

22.84 km
Weekly Cost, ₹ 65000

55000

Haul Container System

45000
Stationary Container System

35000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Round Trip Haul Distance (x), km

Alternate way

a) Determining the maximum round trip haul distance at which the cost for hauled container system equals the costs for
stationary container system by equating the total cost for the two systems and solving for ‘x’.

Total costhcs = Total costscs

43046.64 + 1024.32 (x) = 63843.28 + 113.84 (x)

≫ 20,796.59 = 910.48𝑥
≫ 𝑥 = 22.84 𝑘𝑚

(one-way distance ~11.5 kms)

COLLECTION ROUTES
COLLECTION ROUTES

 Use a heuristic (common sense), trial and error approach consistent with the philosophy of
collecting the most waste with least resources in the context of constraints such as
equipment breakdowns, holidays and vacations, good labor practices and the following
guidelines:

 Crew size and vehicles must be known and coordinated.

 Routes should begin and end near arteries.

 Topographic and physical boundaries should be route boundaries.

 Layout of residential collection routes
PROBLEM STATEMENT: Layout collection routes for a residential area has been shown in the figure given below.

2, 6, 12 = number of
residences each block
The service area map would be prepared as the first step in the layout of collection routes. Assume that the following
conditions apply:

1. General
i. Occupants per residence = 3.5
ii. Solid waste collection rate = 1.6 kg/capita.d
iii. Collection frequency = once/week
iv. Type of collection service = curb
v. Collection crew size = one person
vi. Collection vehicle capacity = 10.7 m3
vii. Compacted specific weight of solid waste in collection vehicle = 320 kg/m3
2. Collection route constraints
a) No U-turn in streets.
b) Collection from each side of the street with stand-up right hand-drive collection.
SOLUTION

1. Development of data needed to establish collection

routes

a) Determination of total number of residences

from which wastes are to be collected

Residences = 10 (16) + 4(36) + 1(28)

= 332
a) Determination of the compacted volume of solid waste to be collected per week
[( Residences × occupants per residence × solid waste collection rate) × 7 d/wk]
Volume per week =
Compacted specific weight of solid waste in collection vehicle

[(332 residences × 3.5 persons/residence × 1.6 kg/capita . d) × 7 d/wk]

=
320 kg/m3
= 40.67 m3

b) Determination of the number of trips required per week

Compacted volume of solid waste collected per week
Trip/wk =
Collection vehicle capacity per week
40.67
=
10.7
= 3.8 Use 4.0
b) Determination of the average number of Start route 1

residences from which wastes are to be collected

on each collection trip

End route 1
Residences/trip = 332/4 = 83

2. Layout collection routes by successive trials

using the route constraints cited above as a
guide.

Four typical routes are shown in the figure right.

ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
End
The effectiveness of the collection routes can be route 2
Start route 2
assessed by the amount of route overlap shown by
the dotted lines.
Thank You