Structural Concrete - 2022 - Galeote - Statistical Analysis of An Experimental Database On Residual Flexural Strengths of
Structural Concrete - 2022 - Galeote - Statistical Analysis of An Experimental Database On Residual Flexural Strengths of
See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Received: 23 June 2021 Revised: 3 January 2022 Accepted: 6 March 2022
DOI: 10.1002/suco.202100416
ARTICLE
Eduardo Galeote1
| Alvaro Picazo2 | Marcos G. Alberti3 |
Albert de la Fuente1
| Alejandro Enfedaque3
| Jaime C. Galvez3 |
Antonio Aguado1
1
Departament d'Enginyeria Civil i
Ambiental, Universitat Politècnica de Abstract
Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain The postcracking capacity of fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) mainly depends
2
Departamento de Tecnología de la on the content, material, and geometry of the fibers considered. Even though
Edificaci
on, E.T.S de Edificaci
on,
the general influence of these factors on FRC behavior has been extensively
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid,
Madrid, Spain addressed, the uncertainty of the FRC performance prediction along with the
3
Departamento de Ingeniería Civil: variability of the results still poses a challenging issue that needs to be solved
Construccion, E.T.S de Ingenieros de to encourage the use of FRC for design and construction purposes. In this line,
Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Universidad
Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain a database including the results of the flexural residual strength obtained from
different experimental programs combined with the results of previous studies
Correspondence has been gathered and analyzed herein to obtain general correlations and
Albert de la Fuente, Departament
d'Enginyeria Civil i Ambiental, trends providing additional information about the influence of the fibers in
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, FRC behavior, these meant to serve for initial design stages (e.g., make deci-
Jordi Girona 1-3, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
sions on the type and amount of fibers based on technical and economical
Email: [email protected]
requirements). The results are analyzed distinguishing between the fiber mate-
Funding information rial, the fiber shape, the aspect ratio and tensile strength. The results presented
Ministerio de Economía, Industria y
Competitividad, Gobierno de España,
herein may provide valuable information on the initial prediction of the resid-
Grant/Award Numbers: ual strength of FRC to fully take advantage of the mechanical properties of the
BIA2016-78742-C2-1-R, material.
BIA2016-78742-C2-2-R,
PID2019-108978RB-C31,
KEYWORDS
PID2019-108978RB-C32; Ministry of
Economy, Industry and Competitiveness experimental analysis, fiber reinforced concrete, flexural residual strength, steel fiber,
synthetic fiber
1 | INTRODUCTION
Discussion on this paper must be submitted within two months of the
print publication. The discussion will then be published in print, along
Fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) is gaining ground in a
with the authors’ closure, if any, approximately nine months after the wide range of structural applications in which traditional
print publication. reinforcement has been commonly used. The new
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
© 2022 The Authors. Structural Concrete published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation for Structural Concrete
developments in concrete technology have led FRC to performance of both fibers. Additionally, the use of dif-
experience an increasing use in recent years mainly due ferent fibers has a direct influence on the scatter of the
to the appearance of codes and guidelines providing pro- results. These correlations provide useful information to
visions for FRC design. Proof of this is the development designers and decision-makers to enable the selection
of different types of concrete such as self-compacting of the most appropriate fiber type and the range of
FRC or high-performance fiber reinforced concrete1 cur- quantities of that to meet the mechanical requirements
rently being applied in practice. In this regard, specific established (e.g., fR1k and fR3k/fR1k according to the fib
design rules for FRC have been included in European MC2010) at predesign stages.
codes,2 along with reference recommendations and
guidelines such as those of RILEM TC 162-TDF3 and the
fib Model Code 2010 (MC2010).4 The fib Model Code 2 | DATA COLLECTION
2020 (MC2020), now in preparation, aims to go beyond
the MC2010, integrating innovative guidelines for the 2.1 | Materials and mixes
design of new and traditional reinforced concrete and
FRC structures.5 A comprehensive database of the flexural and residual
The large amount of fibers that are commercially strength of FRC blended with 27 types of fibers was gen-
available opens a wide range of possibilities to design and erated for the analysis and correlation of the postcracking
manufacture FRC mixes that allow reaching the required properties. These data are based on the results of flexural
mechanical performance. Different materials of fibers— tests conducted at the UPC and the UPM which were
primarily steel and synthetic—may be used as reinforce- characterized within the context of structural applica-
ment for structural purposes, with properties such as the tions of FRC and/or research projects. Additional results
aspect ratio, shape, bond strength, content, orientation, of flexural tests published by Venkateshwaran et al.7 and
and distribution focusing most of the research attention Tiberti et al.11 have been included in the analyses to
on their remarkable influence on the mechanical perfor- increase the amount of data and improve the representa-
mance of FRC.6,7 For this reason, as almost every param- bility of the results. The database includes a large variety
eter cited influences each other, finding a relation of such of concretes mixes, covering various ranges of compres-
factor with the residual strength is a complex task, need- sive strength (fc) of the mixes, volume fraction of fibers
less to mention the high variability associated with the (Vf), fiber aspect ratio (λ), fiber tensile strength (fct), and
postcracking strength,8 which still presents one of the fiber modulus of elasticity (E):
main issues in terms of design and quality control
for FRC.9 • Mean compressive strength, ranging between 15 and
Taking that into account, an analysis of the main fac- 80 MPa.
tors influencing the postcracking behavior of FRC has • Volume fraction of fibers, from 0.33% to 2.52%.
been performed. To conduct such study, a database of the • Fiber length, ranging from 13 to 60 mm.
postcracking strength of FRC determined through three- • Fiber aspect ratio, ranging from 35 to 110.
point bending tests of 371 specimens of steel fiber • Fiber tensile strength, ranging from 300 to 3000 MPa.
reinforced concrete and 315 specimens of synthetic fiber • Modulus of elasticity, ranging from 2.0 to 21.0 GPa in
reinforced concrete conducted at the Universitat synthetic fibers and from 200 to 210 GPa in steel fibers.
Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) and the Universidad
Politècnica de Madrid (UPM) has been collected. Based Almost 70% of the concrete mixes presented an average
on the results of this database, the influence among the compressive strength (fcm) between 25 and 55 MPa,
compressive strength, volume fraction of fibers, tensile whereas only 8% of the concrete presented a compressive
strength, aspect ratio, type of fiber and its geometry have behavior below 25 MPa and 22% reached strengths from
been analyzed given their major influence on the residual 55 to 80 MPa. Among the fibers used, 88% presented a
strength of FRC.10 Additionally, a study based on the tensile strength up to 2000 MPa and 12% were high-
relation of residual strengths fR1 and fR3 and the charac- tensile strength fibers ranging from 2000 to 3000 MPa,
teristic residual strengths (fR1k and fR3k, respectively) has the latter mainly addressed to be used as reinforcement
been conducted to identify the potential correlations of FRC with the highest performances.
between both parameters. The ranges of the properties of the fibers used as rein-
In general terms, the analysis of the database and forcement are detailed in Table 1, showing the tensile
the subsequent relations between residual strengths fR1 strength (fuf), modulus of elasticity (E), length (l), equiva-
and fR3 has been conducted by considering steel and lent diameter (ɸeq) and aspect ratio (λ = l/ɸeq). Synthetic
synthetic fibers separately due to the different (polyolefin and polypropylene) fibers were straight
17517648, 2022, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/suco.202100416 by Universidad Politecnica De Cataluny, Wiley Online Library on [26/10/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
3142 GALEOTE ET AL.
although presented different superficial geometries, while bending configuration following the EN 14651.13 Cylin-
steel fibers presented straight, simple hooked-end (1HE) drical specimens of ɸ150 mm 300 mm were used for
or double and triple hooked-end (2HE and 3HE) shapes. assessing the compressive strength, whereas beams of
Different dosages were designed orienting the compo- dimensions 150 mm 150 mm 600 mm were used for
sition of the granular skeleton to achieve a proper com- conducting the bending tests. In some cases, the data col-
patibility between the concrete matrix and the fibers and lected also included beams with dimensions
to achieve desired performances. In terms of compressive 100 mm 100 mm 400 mm.
strength, the concretes used can be classified from con- Bending tests for determining the postcracking
ventional to high-performance concrete, although spe- strength were conducted under a closed-loop system
cific values of compressive strength or further details through crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) rate
concerning the concrete mixture proportions, casting pro- control. Based on the specifications of the standard EN
cedure or time of curing could not be collected in all 14651, the test was conducted using a CMOD rate of
cases. Further details about the distribution of the com- 0.05 mm/min up to a crack opening of 0.1 mm, which
pressive strengths and the fibers from the database are was subsequently increased to 0.2 mm/min up to a
shown in Figure 1. CMOD of 4 mm.
Compressive strengths were determined according with The analyses focus on the residual strengths at crack
the specifications of the standard EN 12390-3,12 while openings of 0.5 and 2.5 mm (fR1 and fR3, respectively)
flexural tests were conducted under a three-point given their major relevance in design, determination of
constitutive laws, and quality control for FRC. These according with the Mahalanobis distance method
parameters are associated with the design criteria at Ser- (MD) and considering a Chi-square distribution with two
vice Limit State and Ultimate Limit State. degrees of freedom to define the critical distance with a
A different variety of parameters of the fibers have statistical significance of p >0.001. The MD is based on
been analyzed to determine their influence on the post- the measure between two data points in the space to
cracking strength of FRC. Despite the great amount of detect multivariate outliers that may affect fit indices.
data gathered, the analyses of the different parameters The relation between individual values of fR1 and fR3
have been conducted by selecting specific mixes given for steel and synthetic fibers after the multivariate out-
that some analyses could only be performed between liers analysis is shown in Figure 2, exhibiting a clear
mixes presenting the same characteristics and only one increasing trend following a linear correlation with deter-
different variable. This selection of mixes for comparison mination coefficients R2 = 0.84 for steel fibers and R2
purposes was performed to ensure a rigorous analysis, close to 0.80 for synthetic fibers. It should be remarked
although considerably reduced the number of specimens that the goodness of the correlation bearing in mind the
and data to analyze specific parameters despite the great wide range of geometrical and mechanical properties for
amount of mixes. the whole set of both steel and synthetic fibers is consid-
Given the low values of the correlations for some of the ered. The analysis for steel fibers includes the results of
cases studied, it is necessary to conduct an analysis focusing 371 specimens reinforced with straight (28%), 1HE (42%),
on different parameters of the fibers separately. Parameters 2HE (21%), and 3HE (9%) fibers. The analysis of synthetic
such as the aspect ratio, the tensile strength, or even the fibers includes 308 results with polyolefin (75%) and poly-
modulus elasticity should be analyzed since establishing propylene (25%) fibers. These are based on the results of
ranges may lead to improved correlations that could pro- different mix compositions, for which at least three speci-
vide additional information of the residual strength mens of each mixture were tested and analyzed.
according with specific properties of the synthetic fibers. According to the correlations presented in Figure 2a,
the results of steel fibers show that fR3 values are smaller
than fR1, this revealing that the residual strengths at crack
3.1 | Relation between fR1 and fR3 openings of 2.5 mm are systematically smaller than those
at crack openings of 0.5 mm. Contrarily (see Figure 2b),
Previous studies have identified relations between the resid- the analysis considering all synthetic fibers shows a rela-
ual strength parameters of steel fiber reinforced concrete.14 tion fR3/fR1 around 1.30, this indicating that the residual
However, further analyses including additional types of strength increases after initial crack openings.10,15–19 In
fibers are required, for which it is important to conduct an this line, the results revealed there is no significant differ-
exploratory analysis to identify the relation between data ence between polyolefin and polypropylene fibers in
and detect whether these relations might be structured or terms of fR3/fR1, with both fibers presenting similar corre-
clustered. A preliminary analysis of the data gathered rev- lations between residual strengths.
ealed the differences between steel and synthetic fibers in Depending on Vf, the postcracking strength of FRC
terms of correlations between fR1 and fR3. Consequently, can present a softening or a hardening behavior, with
both types of fibers have been analyzed separately. fR3/fR1 ratios smaller o greater than 1, respectively.7 The
Given the large amount of data, an analysis to iden- results show that, with the Vf of the FRCs of the database,
tify the outliers was conducted. In this case, some data the use of steel fibers leads to results of fR3 that are gener-
might be outliers for fR1 or fR3 and, therefore, can be out- ally lower than the results of fR1, this indicating that the
lying in two different directions. Outliers were detected residual strength gradually decreases for larger crack
F I G U R E 2 Relation
between fR1 and fR3 for (a) steel
and (b) synthetic fibers
17517648, 2022, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/suco.202100416 by Universidad Politecnica De Cataluny, Wiley Online Library on [26/10/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
3144 GALEOTE ET AL.
F I G U R E 3 Relation
between fR1 and fR3 for
(a) hooked-end and (b) straight
fibers
F I G U R E 7 fR1k-fR3k relation
for (a) steel and (b) synthetic
fibers
Regarding the synthetic fibers (see Figure 6), the The relation fR1k-fR3k for FRC with steel fibers reveals a
larger diversity on both the fiber material properties and good correlation between characteristic residual strengths.
geometry is reflected on the variability of the fR and, This effect can be attributed to the homogeneity of steel fibers
therefore, on the characteristic values. The variability of in terms of elastic modulus and tensile strength, regardless of
the results is shown with the goodness of fit of the corre- the amount of fibers blended in the mix. In line with the
lation between fRi and fRik for synthetic fibers, with deter- results of Figure 5, the results of the joint analysis of different
mination coefficients of 0.84 and 0.78. synthetic fibers shown in Figure 7b reveal the variety of elas-
Figure 7 shows the relation between characteristic tic modulus and tensile strengths of synthetic fibers given the
strengths using both steel and synthetic fibers with dif- greater heterogeneity of their properties as a result of the dif-
ferent geometries and mechanical properties. In gen- ferent types of fibers available. The fR1k-fR3k relation of a spe-
eral terms, the results present a trend in line with the cific synthetic fiber blended in four volumes of fibers (0.33%,
results reported in Figure 2, where fR3k values generally 0.49%, 0.65%, and 1.09%) is shown in Figure 8.
exhibit lower results than fR1k in the case of steel FRC The variability of the fR1k-fR3k analysis of a single syn-
and fR3k values greater than fR1k values in synthetic thetic fiber presents a lower value with respect to the one
fibers. obtained for the combined analysis of several fibers.
17517648, 2022, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/suco.202100416 by Universidad Politecnica De Cataluny, Wiley Online Library on [26/10/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
3146 GALEOTE ET AL.
These results indicate that when considering a specific population (SDFP). Based on the Annex 1 of the recom-
fiber, a good control and prediction of the FRC behavior mendations for Ultra High Performance Fiber-Reinforced
can be achieved. In line with the results displayed in Concretes of the AFGC,22 the characteristic value of the
Figure 3, the results indicate that a specific fiber can lead residual strength of a sample population can be calcu-
to a good prediction of the FRC behavior. lated by means of a multiplying factor using the Student–
Fisher law with a probability of nonoccurrence of less
than 5% (SF5%) considering the number of samples from
3.3 | Number of specimens which the characteristic strength is obtained.
An additional approach considering a multiplying
The characteristic residual strength can be calculated factor (k) accounting for a 75% confidence interval
considering a normal distribution that is based on fRm, a (MF75%) has been also specified in previous research to
constant Z that accounts for the confidence interval used determine the characteristic strength depending on the
(Z = 1.64 for 95% probability) and the standard deviation number of specimens tested.8,23 Such multiplying factor
of the population. However, in statistical terms, the num- approaches 1 when the number of tested samples
ber of specimens tested has a direct influence on the esti- increases, given that so does the certainty related with
mation of the characteristic strength21 and the standard the estimation of the standard deviation. Conversely, a
deviation to obtain the characteristic strength is usually smaller number of samples is associated with a greater
determined for a specific number of samples, which does factor k to compensate for the increased uncertainty of
not coincide with the standard deviation of the full the standard deviation.
The results of the characteristic strengths for steel
fibers calculated according to the three different assump-
tions considered (SDFP, SF5% and MF75%) are shown in
Figure 9. The characteristic strengths according to the
SDFP approach were determined considering the classi-
cal assumption that the SDFP coincides with the stan-
dard deviation of a specific number of specimens
(fck = fcm 1.64σ). Results for SF5% and MF75% were
determined considering the number of specimens of each
result (between three and nine specimens).
The greatest correlation for both fR1-fR1k and fR3-fR3k
corresponds to the relation between the average and the
characteristic residual strength considering that the stan-
dard deviation of the sample coincides with the standard
deviation of the population. The results reveal that when
the number of samples analyzed are not considered to
determine the characteristic strength, fRk values become
FIGURE 8 fR1k-fR3k relation for a single type of synthetic fiber closer to fcm. Conversely, when considering the number
FIGURE 9 Relation between average and characteristic residual strength (a) fR1-fR1k and (b) fR3-fR3k
17517648, 2022, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/suco.202100416 by Universidad Politecnica De Cataluny, Wiley Online Library on [26/10/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
GALEOTE ET AL. 3147
F I G U R E 1 0 Influence of
Vf(Lf/ɸf)fufE0.5 on the residual
strength of (a) multiple-hooked
end steel and (b) simple hooked-
end steel fiber reinforced
concrete
of specimens, the characteristic strength decreases given and properties of fibers (Vf(Lf/ɸf)fufE0.5) have been used
that a fewer number of specimens increases the uncer- to evaluate the relationship with residual strengths fR1 and
tainty of the standard deviation, making the ratio fRik/fRim fR3. The results for steel fibers are shown in Figure 10, these
decrease. including fibers with multiple HEs. Given the shape of
steel fibers, previous research7,26,30 has attributed the differ-
ent response of FRC blended with these type of fibers to
3.4 | Relation of parameters the anchorage mechanism and the debonding procedure of
the fibers. A separate analysis only considering 1HE fibers
As pointed out in several investigations,24 there is a con- has been conducted (Figure 10b) given that this type of
nection between compressive strength and residual fibers are the vast majority of the steel fiber reinforcement
strength of FRC which can be attributed to two main fac- of the FRC data collected.
tors: the fiber–matrix interface and the concrete shrink- The results for steel fibers are in line with the correla-
age. Higher compressive strengths are the result of tions presented by previous authors,11 showing a similar
greater matrix densities, which improve the adherence correlation between fR1 and fR3 and the parameter for the
and the interface between the matrix and the fiber due to properties of the fibers in terms of both the coefficient of
the reduction of voids25 while enhancing the pull-out correlation and the correlation equation. A comparison
resistance.26 Additionally, low water-to-cement ratios of the steel FRC results between Figure 10a,b reveals that
(w/c) present an enhanced compressive strength and if considering only 1HE fibers there is an improved corre-
greater shrinkage magnitudes27,28 that increase the con- lation in the residual strength fR3, even though no signifi-
finement pressure of the fiber and improve the bond cant differences can be appreciated in the correlation for
properties at the fiber–matrix interface. As a result, the fR1. Such results reveal that fibers with multiple hooks
stronger the bond between the matrix and the fiber inter- may produce a greater impact in fR3 than in fR1 as the
face, the greater the likelihood of the fibers to break than presence of multiple hooks leads to an improved anchor-
being pulled-out.29 Accordingly, and in line with the ana- age and bonding resistance resulting in a greater residual
11
lyses reported by previousp authors,
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffi the square root of strength at larger crack widths.
the compressive strength f cm can be related to the
residual strength of FRC (fRi).
A correlation for the residual strength of FRC can 3.5 | Influence of the volume fraction of
be generalized through a combination of parameters fibers
involving the properties of the fibers.11 As identified
in such research, the correlation of the results In line with analyses reported by other researchers,10,31
depends on the volume, the material, and the type of the influence of fibers is barely noticeable on the com-
the fibers. The aspect ratio has also a great influence pressive strength. However, other studies state that
on the residual strength of fiber reinforced concrete, increasing the amount of fibers leads to improving the
while the geometry of the fibers directly affects the compressive strength of concrete32,33 given that fibers
fiber–matrix interface and, consequently, the adher- tend to extend the microcracking stage and, hence, delay
ence, debonding performance and the pull-out behav- macrocracking producing failure at higher compressive
ior under tension. pffiffiffiffiffiffiffi strengths. Such analyses may provide additional informa-
Accordingly, both the compressive strength f cm tion about the general behavior of FRC under compres-
and the combination of the parameters for the volume sion, although compressive strength is known to be
17517648, 2022, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/suco.202100416 by Universidad Politecnica De Cataluny, Wiley Online Library on [26/10/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
3148 GALEOTE ET AL.
F I G U R E 1 1 Influence of Vf
on the deflection-softening or
deflection-hardening behavior
mainly governed by the properties of the concrete matrix from 0.76% to 1.53%. All fibers present 1HEs with a
rather than the fibers. Accordingly, and based on the length l = 50 mm and aspect ratio lf/df = 50 mm/mm.
results of the analyses performed, a relation between the The results reveal how Vf is the main responsible of
content of fibers and the compressive strength of concrete the deflection-softening or deflection-hardening post-
could not be identified. cracking behavior of FRC. This effect is generally attrib-
A similar dilemma regarding the influence of the vol- uted to the fact that the number of fibers at the crack
ume of fibers on the strength at the limit of proportional- surface increases with the volume of fibers introduced in
ity (fLOP) has been reported in previous research.32,34,35 the FRC mix.41 In both mixes, the volume of fibers of
An analysis on straight and hooked fibers in volume frac- 0.76% presents a slight deflection-hardening behavior. In
tions of 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0% concluded that Vf did the light of these results and given that the volume frac-
not have a significant relevance on fLOP given that at this tion of 0.57% presents a small deflection-softening perfor-
stage, as in the case of the compressive performance, the mance, a volume of fibers of approximately 0.64% could
strength mainly depends on the properties of the concrete be considered for this type of fibers (and concrete
matrix. However, other studies conducted on straight and strength class) as the boundary between deflection-
hooked fibers in similar fiber volume proportions36,37 softening and deflection-hardening.
indicate that increasing the content of fibers tends to Each type of fiber may present a different boundary
enhance the cracking strength since the greater presence between the hardening and the softening behavior of FRC
of fibers contributes to sustain the load at the cracks. In given that additional factors such as the geometry, tensile
this line, some authors38,39 analyze and propose empirical strength, density and material of the fiber need to be con-
equations to determine the cracking strength using the sidered. These factors have a direct effect on both the con-
volume fraction of fibers, among other parameters. tribution of the fibers to the tensile strength of concrete
It is at the cracked stage where the effect of fibers and the number of fibers crossing the crack surface bridg-
takes great relevance. At the cracked stage, the improve- ing the crack. In this line, the density of the material of
ment of the residual strength as a result of increasing the the fiber also affects the variability of the results since the
fiber content in FRC has been extensively described in lower density of synthetic fibers with regard to those made
the literature,14,40 with residual strength increasing with of steel turns the number of fibers to increase, this leading
greater fiber volumes. The results shown in Figure 11 to a higher number of fibers at the cracked surface that
present the influence of several volumes of fibers on the reduces the scatter of the residual strength results.20
residual strength of different FRC in terms of CMOD The amount of fibers blended into a concrete mix and
obtained through the bending test. Residual strengths are its consequent softening or hardening behavior has a
shown in relative terms (fRi,rel) with respect to the crack- direct effect on the characteristic residual strengths and
ing strength fLOP. Accordingly, the first point at a crack the relation fR3k/fR1k. According to the MC2010, the post-
opening of 0.05 mm represents the relative cracking cracking strength of FRC can be classified by considering
strength fLOP/fLOP whereas the subsequent points at the characteristic flexural residual strength values in ser-
increasing crack widths state for residual strengths fRi/ viceability (fR1k) and ultimate (fR3k) conditions. In this
fLOP. The results are presented in two separate groups line, the MC2010 also states that it is possible to replace
given that the concrete admixtures and proportioning are concrete traditional reinforcement by fibers as long as
slightly different. One of these differences is the volume FRC verifies several material ductility requirements (fR1k/
fraction of fibers; while one group is reinforced with fLOP >0.4 and fR3k/fR1k >0.5) to guarantee ductility in case
fibers in volumes ranging from 0.38% to 0.76%, the sec- of failure by presenting a minimum residual strength
ond group presented was blended with volumes of fibers even at large crack widths.
17517648, 2022, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/suco.202100416 by Universidad Politecnica De Cataluny, Wiley Online Library on [26/10/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
GALEOTE ET AL. 3149
A relation between Vf and the ratio fR3k/fR1k is shown tensile strengths (fuf). A set of results of different mixes of
in Figure 12. The results are shown for the characteristic FRC are presented in two separate groups with tensile
strength results of a HE steel fiber and synthetic fibers, strengths for steel fibers ranging between 1000–1400 MPa
both with an aspect ratio of 65.0 and blended in different and 1400–2300 MPa and for synthetic fibers between
volumes. The results indicate that greater Vf leads to an 300–450 MPa and 450–650 MPa.
increasing trend of the ratio fR3k/fR1k, especially for the FRC mixes blended with steel fibers presenting a ten-
case of synthetic fibers, whose trendline slope is greater sile strength ranging from 1000 to 1400 MPa exhibit a
than the one for steel fibers. These results are in accor- smaller fR3 than fR1, whereas those ranging from 1400 to
dance with those shown in Figures 2 and 8, those con- 2300 MPa tend to present fR3 greater than fR1. According
firming the beneficial effect of synthetic fibers at large to the data reported, increasing the tensile strength of the
crack widths when increasing the volume fraction. fibers generally leads to an improved behavior of FRC at
larger crack widths, this leading to a hardening behavior
of fR3 with respect to fR1.
3.6 | Influence of the properties of the In line with the results reported in previous analyses,
fibers FRC mixes with synthetic fibers tend to present greater
strengths at fR3 than at fR1 regardless of the fiber tensile
3.6.1 | Tensile strength strength. The results also reveal a similar strength
increase from fR1 to fR3 for any fiber tensile strength, this
The tensile strength of the fibers directly affects the resid- confirming a good efficiency of synthetic fibers at increas-
ual strength of FRC during the cracked stage. Figure 13 ing crack widths when activated after the load drop at
shows the relation between fR1 and fR3 of 1HE steel fibers the cracking strength.
and synthetic fibers considering different ranges of fiber
F I G U R E 1 3 Influence of
the tensile strength on the
relation between fR1 and fR3 of
(a) steel and (b) synthetic fibers
17517648, 2022, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/suco.202100416 by Universidad Politecnica De Cataluny, Wiley Online Library on [26/10/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
3150 GALEOTE ET AL.
F I G U R E 1 4 Influence of
the aspect ratio of (a) steel and
(b) synthetic fibers on the
residual strength
for steel fibre reinforced concrete” - sigma-epsilon-design 19. Yang JM, Min KH, Shin HO, Yoon YS. Effect of steel and syn-
method - final recommendation. Mater Struct. 2003;36:560–7. thetic fibers on flexural behavior of high-strength concrete
4. International Federation for Structural Concrete. fib Model beams reinforced with FRP bars. Compos Part B Eng. 2012;43:
code for concrete structures 2010. Berlin: Verlag Ernst & John; 1077–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.044
2013. 20. Bernard ES, Xu GG. Influence of fibre count on variability in
5. Matthews S, Bigaj-van Vliet A, Walraven J, Mancini G, post-crack performance of fibre reinforced concrete. Mater
Dieteren G. Fib model code 2020: towards a general code for Struct. 2017;50:169. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1035-5
both new and existing concrete structures. Struct Concr. 2018; 21. Juhasz KP. A proposed evaluation method for three-point
19:969–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201700198 beam tests of fiber-reinforced concrete. J Test Eval. 2021;49:
6. Yoo D-Y, Kang S-T, Yoon Y-S. Effect of fiber length and place- 20190782. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20190782
ment method on flexural behavior, tension-softening curve, 22. AFGC. Ultra high performance fibre-reinforced concrete. Rec-
and fiber distribution characteristics of UHPFRC. Construct ommendations. Paris, France: Association Française de Génie
Build Mater. 2014;64:67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Civil; 2013.
conbuildmat.2014.04.007 23. RILEM TC 162-TDF. Recommendations of RILEM TC
7. Venkateshwaran A, Tan KH, Li Y. Residual flexural strengths 162-TDF: test and design methods for steel fibre reinforced
of steel fiber reinforced concrete with multiple hooked-end concrete σ - ε - design method. Mater Struct. 2000;33:75–81.
fibers. Struct Concr. 2018;19:352–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/ https://doi.org/10.1617/14007
suco.201700030 24. Yoo D-Y, Park J-J, Kim S-W. Fiber pullout behavior of
8. Cavalaro SHP, Aguado A. Intrinsic scatter of FRC: an alterna- HPFRCC: effects of matrix strength and fiber type. Compos
tive philosophy to estimate characteristic values. Mater Struct. Struct. 2017;174:263–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.
2015;48:3537–55. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0420-6 2017.04.064
9. Galeote E, Blanco A, Cavalaro SHP, de la Fuente A. Correla- 25. Yoo D-Y, Banthia N, Kang S-T, Yoon Y-S. Size effect in ultra-
tion between the Barcelona test and the bending test in fibre high-performance concrete beams. Eng Fract Mech. 2016;157:
reinforced concrete. Construct Build Mater. 2017;152:529–38. 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.02.009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.028 26. Abdallah S, Fan M. Anchorage mechanisms of novel geometri-
10. Buratti N, Mazzotti C, Savoia M. Post-cracking behaviour of cal hooked-end steel fibres. Mater Struct. 2017;50:139. https://
steel and macro-synthetic fibre-reinforced concretes. Construct doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0991-5
Build Mater. 2011;25:2713–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. 27. Hossain AB, Weiss J. Assessing residual stress development
conbuildmat.2010.12.022 and stress relaxation in restrained concrete ring specimens.
11. Tiberti G, Germano F, Mudadu A, Plizzari GA. An overview of Cem Concr Compos. 2004;26:531–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/
the flexural post-cracking behavior of steel fiber reinforced con- S0958-9465(03)00069-6
crete. Struct Concr. 2018;19:695–718. https://doi.org/10.1002/ 28. Park SH, Ryu GS, Koh KT, Kim DJ. Effect of shrinkage reduc-
suco.201700068 ing agent on pullout resistance of high-strength steel fibers
12. CEN, EN 12390-3. Testing hardened concrete. Part 3: Compres- embedded in ultra-high-performance concrete. Cem Concr
sive strength of test specimens. 2009. Compos. 2014;49:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
13. EN 14651:2007. Test method for metallic fibre concrete. Mea- cemconcomp.2013.12.012
suring the flexural tensile strength (limit of proportionality 29. Lawler JS, Zampini D, Shah SP. Microfiber and macrofiber
[LOP], residual). 2007. hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete. J Mater Civ Eng. 2005;17:595–
14. Barros JAO. Post-cracking behaviour of steel fibre reinforced 604. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:5(595)
concrete. Mater Struct. 2004;38:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1617/ 30. Abdallah S, Fan M, Rees DWA. Analysis and modelling of
14058 mechanical anchorage of 4D/5D hooked end steel fibres. Mater
15. Alberti MG, Enfedaque A, Galvez JC. On the mechanical prop- Des. 2016;112:539–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.
erties and fracture behavior of polyolefin fiber-reinforced self- 09.107
compacting concrete. Construct Build Mater. 2014;55:274–88. 31. Yoo DY, Yoon YS, Banthia N. Flexural response of steel-fiber-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.024 reinforced concrete beams: effects of strength, fiber content, and
16. Alberti MG, Enfedaque A, Galvez JC, Canovas MF, Osorio IR. strain-rate. Cem Concr Compos. 2015;64:84–92. https://doi.org/
Polyolefin fiber-reinforced concrete enhanced with steel- 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.10.001
hooked fibers in low proportions. Mater Des. 2014;60:57–65. 32. Wu Z, Shi C, He W, Wu L. Effects of steel fiber content and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.050 shape on mechanical properties of ultra high performance con-
17. Alberti MG, Enfedaque A, Galvez JC. Fracture mechanics of crete. Construct Build Mater. 2016;103:8–14. https://doi.org/10.
polyolefin fibre reinforced concrete: study of the influence of 1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.028
the concrete properties, casting procedures, the fibre length 33. Simões T, Costa H, Dias-da-Costa D, Júlio E. Influence of fibres
and specimen size. Eng Fract Mech. 2016;154:225–44. https:// on the mechanical behaviour of fibre reinforced concrete
doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.12.032 matrixes. Construct Build Mater. 2017;137:548–56. https://doi.
18. Alberti MG, Enfedaque A, Galvez JC. Comparison between org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.104
polyolefin fibre reinforced vibrated conventional concrete and 34. Yoo D-Y, Kim S, Park G-J, Park J-J, Kim S-W. Effects of fiber
self-compacting concrete. Construct Build Mater. 2015;85:182– shape, aspect ratio, and volume fraction on flexural behavior of
94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.007 ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced cement composites.
17517648, 2022, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/suco.202100416 by Universidad Politecnica De Cataluny, Wiley Online Library on [26/10/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
GALEOTE ET AL. 3153
Compos Struct. 2017;174:375–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. FRC: a novel philosophy. Cem Concr Res. 2012;42:752–68.
compstruct.2017.04.069 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.02.013
35. Yoo D-Y, Lee J-H, Yoon Y-S. Effect of fiber content on
mechanical and fracture properties of ultra high performance
fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Compos Struct. AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES
2013;106:742–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.
07.033 Eduardo Galeote, Post-doctoral Researcher,
36. Akcay B, Tasdemir MA. Mechanical behaviour and fibre dis-
Departament d'Enginyeria Civil i Ambiental,
persion of hybrid steel fibre reinforced self-compacting con-
crete. Construct Build Mater. 2012;28:287–93. https://doi.org/
Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya, Barcelona,
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.044 Spain.
37. Pająk M, Ponikiewski T. Flexural behavior of self-compacting
Alvaro Picazo, Associate Professor, Departamento de
concrete reinforced with different types of steel fibers. Con-
Tecnología de la Edificacion, E.T.S de Edificacion,
struct Build Mater. 2013;47:397–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
conbuildmat.2013.05.072 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
38. Naaman AE. Engineered steel fibers with optimal properties Marcos G. Alberti, Associate Professor,
for reinforcement of cement composites. J Adv Concrete
Departamento de Ingeniería Civil: Construcci
on, E.T.S
Technol. 2003;1:241–52. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.1.241
39. Naaman AE, Reinhardt HW. Proposed classification of HPFRC
de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos,
composites based on their tensile response. Mater Struct. 2007; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
39:547–55. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-006-9103-2 Albert de la Fuente, Associate Professor,
40. Yoo D-Y, Shin H-O, Yang J-M, Yoon Y-S. Material and bond
Departament d'Enginyeria Civil i Ambiental,
properties of ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete
with micro steel fibers. Compos Part B Eng. 2014;58:122–33.
Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya, Barcelona,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.081 Spain.
41. Abrishambaf A, Pimentel M, Nunes S. Influence of fibre orien-
Alejandro Enfedaque, Associate Professor,
tation on the tensile behaviour of ultra-high performance fibre
Departamento de Ingeniería Civil: Construcci
on, E.T.S
reinforced cementitious composites. Cem Concr Res. 2017;97:
28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.03.007 de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos,
42. Yazici Ş, Inan G, Tabak V. Effect of aspect ratio and volume Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
fraction of steel fiber on the mechanical properties of SFRC.
Jaime C. G alvez, Full Professor, Departamento de
Construct Build Mater. 2007;21:1250–3. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.025
Ingeniería Civil: Construcci
on, E.T.S de Ingenieros de
43. Le Hoang A, Fehling E. Influence of steel fiber content and Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Universidad Politécnica
aspect ratio on the uniaxial tensile and compressive behavior de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
of ultra high performance concrete. Construct Build Mater.
Antonio Aguado, Emeritus Professor, Departament
2017;153:790–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.
07.130
d'Enginyeria Civil i Ambiental, Universitat Politècnica
44. Yoo DY, Zi G, Kang ST, Yoon YS. Biaxial flexural behavior of de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete with different
fiber lengths and placement methods. Cem Concr Compos. 2015;
63:51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.07.011
45. Michels J, Christen R, Waldmann D. Experimental and numer- How to cite this article: Galeote E, Picazo A,
ical investigation on postcracking behavior of steel fiber
Alberti MG, de la Fuente A, Enfedaque A,
reinforced concrete. Eng Fract Mech. 2013;98:326–49. https://
Galvez JC, et al. Statistical analysis of an
doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.11.004
experimental database on residual flexural
46. Dupont D, Vandewalle L. Distribution of steel fibres in rectan-
gular sections. Cem Concr Compos. 2005;27:391–8. https://doi. strengths of fiber reinforced concretes:
org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.03.005 Performance-based equations. Structural Concrete.
47. Laranjeira F, Aguado A, Molins C, Grünewald S, Walraven J, 2022;23:3140–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.
Cavalaro S. Framework to predict the orientation of fibers in 202100416