PSD2 Taking Advantage of Open Ban
PSD2 Taking Advantage of Open Ban
advantage of open-
banking disruption
Authored by:
Alessio Botta
Tommaso Jacopo Ulissi
Elia Sasia
Nunzio Digiacomo
Reinhard Höll
Reema Jain
Liz Oakes
PSD2: Taking
advantage of open-
banking disruption
Introduction
The second Payment Services Directive (PSD2) is ties opened up by PSD2. However, banks need
part of a global trend in bank regulation empha- to act promptly to chart a precise business strat-
sizing security, innovation, and market competi- egy and gain a fast-mover advantage. While
tion. By requiring banks to provide other qualified PSD2 is a European initiative, it provides an ex-
payment-service providers (PSPs) connectivity to ample for other markets such as China and the
access customer account data and to initiate United States that are taking gradual steps to-
payments, PSD2 represents a significant step to- ward open banking. As part of a continuing series
wards commoditization in the EU banking sector. on global trends toward open banking,1 this arti-
cle reports on banks’ progress toward PSD2
Our recent survey of bank executives shows that compliance and their preparation to compete for
most are alert to the threat and exploring innova- new retail and corporate business opportunities.
tive and potentially lucrative business opportuni-
1
Articles in this series include: “PSD2: Time for radical change,” McKinsey & Company Global Payments Practice, March 2017;
“Data sharing and open banking” and “Monetizing data: A new source of value in payments,” McKinsey on Payments, July 2017.
Future articles will examine progress on the implementation of PSD2, as well as developments related to the EU’s General Data
Protection Regulation and the SEPA Instant Credit Transfer scheme.
This summary highlights the main challenges Using internal data to optimize risk scoring and
posed by PSD2, key business opportunities, and increase cross-selling among SMEs and mid-size
strategic recommendations. corporates could also boost profits significantly.
On the retail side, most executives consider
PSD2 poses serious challenges “lifestyle” apps (which integrate financial manage-
The key threat to payments incumbents arising ment—payments, consumer finance, invest-
from the implementation of PSD2 is the potential ments, insurance—across multiple providers) to
erosion of transaction volume, revenues, and be the most attractive opportunity.
customer loyalty, as aggressive new service
providers deliver fast, inexpensive, and com- Recommendations
pelling use cases. In addition, payments and fi- To succeed under PSD2, banks need to survey
nance functions are increasingly embedded the full breadth of customer experiences (retail
within digital applications that address the full and corporate) and identify the functions where
scope of the value chain, often within the context they are positioned to add value. Each potential
of a closed-loop ecosystem. PSD2 will make it use case should be evaluated on its capacity to
easier for platform companies to leverage their augment customer touch points and data stores,
vast stores of behavioral data to compete with increase revenue, and expand market share.
traditional financial services companies in offering Bank executives must also decide whether to
consumer finance as well as payments services. lead the market or be a fast follower.
2
Certain corporate account and transaction management functions, e.g., data exchange using the Electronic Banking Internet
Communication Standard (EBICS), will not change with implementation of PSD2.
3
PSD2 defines three types of PSPs: Account information service providers (AISPs) and payment initiation service providers (PISPs)
may secure direct access to accounts without the consent of the account servicing payment service provider (ASPSP, i.e., the
user’s bank).
PSD2 Pillar I came into force in January 2018; full implementation 2019
November 2015 Final approval of PSD2 directive by Council of the European Union
to connect with their systems to access ac- official publication of the final regulatory techni-
count information and initiate payments on be- cal standards on SCA, which is expected in
half of customers. These standards also require February 2018.
banks to provide a protected “sandbox” to
PSPs for testing and ongoing development of Challenges—and opportunities—for banks
services that use the bank’s interface. Once the new transparency standards are imple-
mented in January 2018, competition on pricing
Compliance with PSD2 is required in two will likely intensify. And, as technologically agile
phases (Exhibit 1). Pillar 1 (transparency) be- PSPs begin leveraging automated access to cus-
came effective upon the directive’s transposition tomer accounts with the implementation of Pillar
into national law on January 13, 2018. The an- 3, the squeeze on both pricing and margins will
ticipated implementation date for Pillars 2 and 3 almost certainly tighten further. Indeed, our recent
is the third quarter of 2019, 18 months after the survey of regional and domestic banks shows
While PSD2 poses serious threats to current To sustain strong returns under PSD2, a smaller
business models, it also creates opportunities for bank might attack with an integrated payments-
banks to compete as technology innovators and-financial-management solution, while a large
wielding powerful analytical tools to extract valu- incumbent might develop its own ecosystem, of-
able insights from their vast stores of proprietary fering access to a broad selection of applications
data. Market dynamics and customer attitudes from diverse providers. In either approach, banks
may favor banks that can capture opportunities must design highly efficient, scalable technology
quickly and effectively. If third parties do not gain architecture to support innovative solutions. If
the full trust of customers, banks could retain they strike the right balance of financial asset
their role as trusted financial anchor, as cus- management and data-asset augmentation, they
tomers would not find it attractive to provide third have the potential to boost revenue, strengthen
parties access to their data or accounts (unless margins, and increase market share.
recommended by banks). But there are no guar-
antees that banks will be able to defend their sta- Investing to lead PSD2 disruption
tus as secure trusted advisors. In the worst-case The fundamental technology requirement for
scenario, closed-loop ecosystems could emerge mandatory compliance is an interface (for exam-
and reduce banks to the role of balance-sheet ple, an open application programming interface
provider. Customer interactions would be re- [API]) allowing account-information service
duced significantly, with current account transac- providers (AISPs) and payment-initiation service
4
In June, July, and September of 2017, McKinsey surveyed about 20 banks across Europe about their preparation for the imple-
mentation of PSD2. Data were collected through a written survey of 17 questions and executive interviews. Responses are re-
ported as aggregate data.
1
Account information service provider; payment initiation service provider
Source: McKinsey Global Payments Practice PSD2 Survey 2017
providers (PISPs) access to client account and agement. Banks are responsible for mitigating fraud
transaction information.5 Most of the banks sur- risk and will need to implement advanced controls,
veyed reported that they were on track to comply including advanced analytics (for example, to vali-
fully with the directive when it goes into effect. date the origin of inbound calls to the API) and
strong tools to detect fraud attacks. The survey re-
Most banks report that they do not expect security spondents indicated that the risk of fraud arising
to become a problem under PSD2; however, they from third-party access to accounts is a serious
also recognize that they must invest in fraud man- concern and that fraud prevention is a top priority.
5
Banks must provide system access to diverse client-facing AISPs and PISPs, enabling them to seamlessly access bank account
systems via an open interface to verify availability of funds, block funds, initiate transactions, and conduct transaction-risk anal-
ysis. Some existing standards, such as EBICS, are already compliant.
Bankers respond: Which organizations will lead the attack once PSD2
goes into effect?
Q: Which “actor” in the payments arena do you believe will benefit the most from the
implementation of PSD2? % of respondents, multiple answers
Fintechs 35%
Telcos 5%
IT outsourcers 20%
1
Account information service provider; payment initiation service provider
Source: McKinsey Global Payments Practice PSD2 Survey 2017
Most of the banks surveyed are looking beyond Survey results also show that most regional
compliance toward new business opportunities. banks are crafting strategies for capturing new
Several are aiming high and investing to lead the revenue and extending market share with innova-
PSD2 revolution. Indeed, many executives report tive, data-intensive use cases for both retail and
that they view PSD2 compliance as part of a corporate clients. On the corporate side, execu-
broad digital transformation. In addition to imple- tives consider multi-account management, trans-
menting the API interfaces necessary to support action management, and cash management/cash
PSP connectivity, most banks are using the imple- pooling as the use cases with the highest poten-
mentation of PSD2 to build new processes, ac- tial impact. As an indication of how far these de-
quire new skill sets, and realign organizational velopment efforts have advanced, nearly 40
structure around data collection and analysis. percent of the banks surveyed report that they
Q: In terms of your bank’s overall positioning toward clients under PSD2, please choose the
activity(ies) currently under development or already completed,
% of respondents, multiple answers
Defining clear
value proposition 30%
Defining
customer journey 5%
Defining customer
segmentation 20%
Designing market
communications 20%
None at
the moment 25%
have also selected technology partners to deliver ments. In both retail and corporate environments,
new offerings under PSD2 (Exhibit 4). payments and finance use cases will increasingly
be embedded within digital applications that ad-
Retail and corporate business opportunities: dress the full value chain (Exhibit 5).
Banker views
In retail and corporate payments alike, the In consumer-to-business (C2B) payments, sev-
biggest opportunities combine capabilities asso- eral banks are developing A2A solutions for in-
ciated with PSD2 (data aggregation and A2A store and e-commerce transactions, bill
transactions) with improvements in settlement payments, and tax payments. Banks should de-
and clearing infrastructures, including faster pay- sign the A2A platform to accommodate faster
Use cases
Link all accounts; track expenses; set and plan
Retail Account aggregation
savings goals; self-administration
Identification and authentication Provide digital identity, e.g., for secure login to tax
services department
Enhanced risk scoring Use multi-account data to enhance risk scoring for
lending
payments (as the European Payments Council’s have such services available). Leveraging A2A so-
SEPA Instant Credit Transfer scheme goes live), lutions potentially in conjunction with faster pay-
and the business-case justification should con- ments, a bank could help small and medium-size
sider the likely cannibalization of card revenues enterprises (SMEs) and midsize corporates in par-
as merchants adopt the lower-cost A2A model. ticular to streamline B2B payments, improving
working-capital management with integrated
On the corporate side, most bank executives ex- payables and receivables. PSD2 also opens the
pect use cases in multi-account management and way for new use cases in cash pooling and for-
cash management to have the biggest impact on eign exchange across multiple banks. Large cor-
client operations (although some markets already porates will most likely continue to use their
6
For more on ecosystems, see Remaking the bank for an ecosystem world, October 2017, McKinsey.com.
7
“PSD2: Time for radical change,” McKinsey & Company Global Payments Practice, March 2017.
Alessio Botta is a partner in McKinsey’s Milan office, where Tommaso Jacopo Ulissi and Elia Sasia
are consultants. Nunzio Digiacomo is an associate partner in the Rome office and Reinhard Höll is
an associate partner in the Dusseldorf office. Reema Jain is a knowledge expert in the Gurgaon of-
fice, and Liz Oakes is an associate partner in the London office.