3 семінар
3 семінар
1. Figures of ambiguity. Speak on SDs known as “play upon words”. Describe the
difference between zeugma and pun.
ZEUGMA [‘ZJUGMA] (from Greek ‘yoke’) is the use of polysemantic word referring to two
adjacent words in the context, in different semantic relations.
It is a kind of PLAY UPON WORDS, as the basic word enters one combination in one meaning,
and the other combination in another meaning. The first meaning is often literal, and the second
metaphorical.
Thus, zeugma usually structurally
consists of three elements: basic
word and its use in two
combinations with different
meanings:
E.g. Silence was not broken by
some time, but the soles were” (J.
Galsworthy, The White Monkey).
Zeugma at its finest: “The farmer
plowed the field and his wife”
PUN (каламбур) is another stylistic device based on the simultaneous realization of two
meanings within the same context. You can distinguish between zeugma and pun in this way: in
pun the word on which the effect is based is repeated:
e.g. Did you hit the woman with the child? – No, Sir, I hit her with a stick (O’Henry).
A pun is AMBIGUITY: specifically, a foregrounded lexical ambiguity. It involves either the use
of polysemantic word or homonyms. Pun commonly occurs in jokes.
Pun based on Polysemy e.g."Money doesn't grow on the trees. But it blossoms at our branches.”
Pun based on complete or partial homonymy e.g. "More sun and air for your son and heir“;
“Make Time For Time.”
Pun based on parody "A Mars a day helps you work, rest and play“
Puns based on phonetic similarity “John said to Pete at dinner: “Carry on”. But Pete never eats
carrion.”
SYLLEPSIS [SI’LEPSIS] (Greek ‘taking together’) is a figure of speech in which one word is
used in two senses within the same utterance; and where the effect is of putting together two co-
ordinate constructions with ellipsis. SYLLEPSIS is very hard to distinguish from ZEUGMA.
It is frequently used for comic effect: e.g. She went home in a flood of tears and a sedan chair
(Dickens); e.g. Search your locker and your conscience
2. Figures of identity
SIMILE is a stylistic device based on partial identification of two unlike objects. From Latin
SIMILIS = like. Thus, in simile two concepts are imaginatively and descriptively compared.
e.g. My love is like a red, red rose; Her face was like a white sheet
Features: simile should not be confused with logical comparison which is devoid of any
stylistic meaning.
The structure of SIMILE:
the tenor
the vehicle
the ground for comparison
e.g. 1. She (the tenor) is as beautiful (the ground) as a rose (the vehicle). 2. She is like a rose
Simile may be expressed by:
Conjunctions ‘as’ or ‘like’: Rosa is as beautiful as a flower
Adverbial clauses of comparison (conjunctions ‘as’, ‘as if’, ‘as though’): Mary behaves
as if she were a child
Adjectives in the comparative degree: ‘Ray behaves worse than a cut-throat’.
Adverbial word-combinations containing prepositional attributes: ‘With the thickness of
a cat, Samuel climbed up the tree’
Simile may be implied, having no formal indications of comparison: ‘Odette had a
strange resemblance to a bird’
SYNONYMS Synonymy is the expression of the ‘same’ meaning by different words within a
language.
It is very hard to list ABSOLUTE synonyms: words that are identical both in DENOTATION or
basic CONCEPTUAL meaning, and in their CONNOTATIONS, and so that can be interchanged
in all contexts. E.g. laryngitis and sore throat.
Synonymic Repetition:
Synonyms – substitutes (‘replacers’) are words used to denote object or thing,
supplementing new additional details.
e.g. “The little boy was crying. It was the child’s usual time for going to bed, but
no one paid attention to the kid.”
e.g. ‘Dear Paul, it’s very weak and silly of me, I know, to be so trembly and shaky
from head to foot.’ (Ch. Dickens)
Synonyms – specifires (specifying, clarifying synonyms) – a chain of words which
express similar meaning.
e.g. ‘You sly, sinful, insidious hog,’ says I to Murkison (O. Henry)
‘Joe was a mild, good-natured, sweet-tempered, easy-going, foolish dear fellow.’
(Ch.Dickens)
2.1. Speak about semantic and structural types of epithets.
Unlike mere attributes EPITHETS describe objects expressively. Epithets are subjective and
evaluating, often metaphorical: e.g. loud ocean, wild wind, irresistible charm.
Epithet is based on the interplay of emotive and logical meaning in an attributive word,
phrase, or even sentence, used to characterize an object. e.g. a smiling sun, the frowning
cloud.
Semantic types of EPITHET:
affective (or emotive proper) e.g. ‘gorgeous’, ‘nasty, ‘magnificent’ ‘atrocious’
figurative (metaphorical, transferred) e.g. a ghost-like face.
A simile helps your reader or listener visualise, understand and have a better conception of
the quality of the nouns being compared. It makes it a lot more vivid and descriptive.
3. Figures of contrast.
OXYMORON (Greek OXYS = sharp, clever + MOROS = dumb, foolish) is a stylistic device
presenting a combination of two contrasting ideas, or two words which are semantically
incompatible. One of the components reveals some objectively existing feature or quality, while
the other one serves to convey the speaker’s subjective attitude towards the same. As a result, a
new meaning is developed and the object under description obtains characteristics contrary to its
nature. (sweet sorrow, wise fool, pleasantly ugly, loving hate)
PARADOX (from Greek = against opinion) is a statement which is apparently self-
contradictory, a kind of expanded OXYMORON. E.g. Orwell’s: “War is peace. Freedom is
slavery. Ignorance is strength” (1984)
Beyond the literal meaning, a deeper, usually more philosophical meaning is found in paradox.
Because of its apparent absurdity and initial puzzlement, paradox is a trope that can be
effectively exploited in advertising slogans to attract attention. It has also been a prominent
device in love poetry.
"What a pity that youth must be wasted on the young." (George Bernard Shaw)
"I must be cruel to be kind.“ (William Shakespeare) “War is peace” (George Orwell)
"Less is more." This statement uses two opposites to contradict one another. How can less be
more?
ANTITHESIS is very close to oxymoron and paradox. A. effectively contrasts ideas by
contrasting LEXICAL ITEMS in a formal structure of parallelism.
often involves explicit antonymy:
e.g. Dickens’s “A Tale of Two Cities”: It was the best of times, it was the worst of times,
it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness…
Many famous quotations are often based on witty or satirical antithesis
e.g. Marriage has many pains, but celibacy has no pleasures (Johnson)
The conjunction ‘but’ is often used as an antithetical conjunct, other explicit antithesis
markers in discourse include ‘on the contrary’, ‘by comparison’, ‘on the other hand’.
ANTICLIMAX (BATHOS)
If climax is a figure of speech that presents arguments in an ascending order of importance,
reserving the best point till last, ANTICLIMAX as its name suggests, puts the best point first It
presents a sudden lowering or deflation from a heightened tone for IRONIC effect.
Anticlimax is used to describe a disappointing turn of events or "let down" that occurs after
tension builds in a text. Unlike climax, anticlimax is the arrangement of a series of words,
phrases, or clauses in order of decreasing importance. It has been much exploited in literature
for humor and satire.
e.g. He lost his family, his car and his cell phone.
If John’s eyes fill with tears, you may have no doubt: he has been eating raw onions.