The document discusses Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences, which identifies nine different types of intelligences: logical-mathematical, verbal-linguistic, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, visual-spatial, naturalist, and existential. It explains that the intelligences are neither superior nor inferior to each other, and that they can all be strengthened through experience and learning. The document also discusses how recognizing different learning styles and intelligences can increase student motivation and responsibility for learning. Finally, it proposes that foreign language teaching can incorporate activities that draw on different intelligences to engage more learners and develop language skills.
The document discusses Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences, which identifies nine different types of intelligences: logical-mathematical, verbal-linguistic, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, visual-spatial, naturalist, and existential. It explains that the intelligences are neither superior nor inferior to each other, and that they can all be strengthened through experience and learning. The document also discusses how recognizing different learning styles and intelligences can increase student motivation and responsibility for learning. Finally, it proposes that foreign language teaching can incorporate activities that draw on different intelligences to engage more learners and develop language skills.
Multiple Intelligence Theory and Foreign Language Learning: A Brain-based
Perspective Howard Gardner's multiple intelligences theory (MIT) (1983,1999) is an important contribution to cognitive science and constitutes a learner-based philosophy which is "an increasingly popular approach to characterizing the ways in which learners are unique and to developing instruction to respond to this uniqueness" (Richards & Rodgers, 2001: 123). MIT is a rationalist model that describes nine different intelligences. It has evolved in response to the need to reach a better understanding of how cognitive individual differences can be addressed and developed in the classroom. Gardner (1999) and his research associates identified: • Mathematical-Logical • Verbal-Linguistic • Musical-Rhythmic, • Bodily-Kinaesthetic • Interpersonal • Intrapersonal • Visual-Spatial • Naturalist • Existential Intelligences. The following criteria have been used in MIT to identify an intelligence: it "entails the ability to solve problems", it involves a "biological proclivity", it has "an identifiable neurological core operation or set of operations" and it is "susceptible to encoding in a symbol system ... which captures and conveys important forms of information" (Gardner 1999: 15-16). The different intelligences are of neutral value; none of them is considered superior to the others. In their basic form, they are present to some extent in everyone, although a person will generally be more talented in some than in others. Each of these frames is autonomous, changeable, and trainable (Armstrong, 1999) and they interact to facilitate the solution of daily problems.
Multiple Intelligences and Learning
Learner diversity Traditionally, whether in an explicit or implicit manner, many learning contexts have been organized and many teachers have taught as if al1 learners were the same. One of the most significant advances in education in the last decades of the twentieth century has come from a considerable amount of research done in the area of learning styles which recognizes that the students in our classrooms have greatly different learning profiles. Reid (1999: 301) lists some of the dimensions which have been investigated in the area of: • Language Learning • Multiple Intelligences • Perceptual Learning Styles • Field Dependence/Independence • Analytic/Global Learning Styles • Reflective / Impulsive Learning Styles Benefits of increasing learners' awareness of their own learning styles: • Higher interest and motivation in the learning process • Increased student responsibility for their own learning • Greater classroom community. These are affective changes, and the changes have resulted in more effective learning 1.2. The holistic nature of learners Gardner's cognitive model proposes that human beings are multidimensional subjects that need to develop not only their more cognitive capacities but also other abilities as, for example, the physical, artistic, and spiritual. Traditionally, leaming has often been considered only a cognitive activity, but if we take brain science into account, this consideration is inaccurate and educationally and socially problematic. Mainstream educational institutions "have focused so intently on the cognitive and have limited themselves so completely to 'educating from the neck up' that this narrowness is resulting in serious social consequences". 1.3. Teachability of intelligences Neuroscience explains that the human brain is a neurally distributed processor where neurons interact and knowledge depends on the connections or synapses of these units. A newborn has all the neurons he or she will have but only a small proportion of the synapses needed in adulthood. These are formed after birth and their creation is mainly driven by experience. Learning is the result of strengthening connections in the brain's neural network. The more a pattern is activated, the stronger the connections will become. MIT is a dynarnic construct that understands intelligences as tools that are changeable and trainable. Thus, Gardner's model of multiple intelligences is a reaction against a conservative and totally biologically driven view which would encourage students to see intelligence as fixed and which could therefore make putting out special effort to achieve academic goals seen not worthwhile. 1.4. Motivation and stimulus appraisal Universally considered vital for learning, motivation is a complex construct which depends to a great degree on the way we evaluate the multiple stimuli we receive in relation to a specific context. The stimulus appraisal concept connects with and provides support for MIT at various points. Learning activities which are varied so that at least some of them relate to the learner's strengths will be more likely to be appraised positively because they will be more comfortable and thus more pleasant, they will be within the learner's coping ability, and they will certainly be more compatible with his or her self-concept. For example, learners with high visual-spatial intelligence who do an activity requiring them to draw pictures of four things that are important to them and then in the foreign language ask each other about their drawings would probably appraise the activity in a favourable way and therefore their motivation towards the activity and the context in which it is carried out would be increased. 1.5. Language aptitude Good second language speakers are often considered to be talented people with special verbal abilities who possess more than one code to understand and acquire knowledge in order to use it in new situations Although most individuals are capable of learning a second language to some degree of competence, some leamers are better equipped for the second language learning task than others. In Gardner's scheme, the verbal-linguistic intelligence does not make direct reference to second language learning However, there seems to be a very plausible link as people with a high verbal- linguistic intelligence are those that tend to think in words and that have the ability to use language effectively both orally and in writing, that is to say, those who have a high level of sensitivity to sounds or phonology, sentence structure or syntax, meaning or semantics and illocutionary force or pragmatics. Frames for language teaching Language leaming tasks can be developed around different types of intelligences. For instance, an activity such as that of writing the lyrics of a song implies the use of linguistic and musical intelligences. In a role-play where leamers may need to express their feelings while being considerate of the feelings of others, linguistic, intrapersonal and interpersonal talents are needed. In a task where leamers need to mime the title of a film for others to guess, the bodily- kinaesthetic and interpersonal abilities are brought into play. MIT is an excellent tool to enable teachers to plan attractive ways to provide leamers with language leaming practice. Within this cognitive model, "language is not seen as limited to a 'linguistics’ perspective but encompasses al1 aspects of communication". The MIT instructional perspective proposes that language leaming, that is to say, developing leamers' verbal linguistic intelligence in a foreign second language, can be favoured by using a variety of leaming tasks which cal1 upon diverse intelligences. The teacher offers a choice of tasks, not to teach to specific intelligences but to give learners the opportunity of apprehending information in their preferred way, as well as to promote the development of their other intelligences. We will now consider briefly how the verbal linguistic intelligence involved in foreign second language learning can be supported by the other intelligence frameworks developed by Gardner.