NEON INDUSTRIAL TESTING & RESEARCH LABORATORY

205A,025B, VILLAGE RAJPURA, MAWANA ROAD NEAR SUBHASH INTER COLLEGE

MEERUT ,(U.P) 250001

Village - Mohamadabad Amroha

Q5C6+2FG, Kharagpur Ahatmali,Uttar Pradesh 244235

CLIENT NAME
Mr Kamal sharma

DATE OF SAMPLING :- 01.08.2023

DATE OF SAMPLE COLLECTION IN LAB :- 02.08.2023

DATE OF REPORTING:- 08.08.2023

Report No.:- S/047620230808-01

NEON INDUSTRIAL TESTING & RESEARCH

LABORATORY NABL ACCREDIATED
LABORATORY
 CONTENTS

SL. No. CHAPTER

1.0 Introduction
2.0 Scope of work
3.0 Site Exploration
4.0 Laboratory Testing
5.0 Ground water table
6.0 Proposed Depth & Type of Foundation
6.1 Shear failure criterion
6.2 Settlement failure criterion
7.0 Conclusion with Recommendation
8.0 Closure
9.0 Bore log Data
10.0 Bearing capacity Analysis
11.0 Settlement Analysis
12.0 General Construction Recommendation
13.0 Sample Photographs
1.0 INTRODUCTION:

This report presented herein deals with the field and laboratory investigations carried out by us
to access the nature of sub-strata and to evaluate the soil parameters required for design of Soil
Investigation at the site for proposed building restaurant village - Mohamadabad Amroha Kharagpur
Ahatmali.
Client’s help is gratefully acknowledged in providing borehole locations, close supervision and
checking during boring, sampling, various testing operations and cooperation and guidance
during finalization of report.

1.1 The work of Geotechnical Investigation was awarded to

1.2 This report is based upon the results of field and laboratory tests conducted on selected soil
samples collected from three bore holes.

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

The scope of geotechnical investigation for this site includes making 03 nos. 150mm dia. bore
hole at specified locations up to 15.0 m below existing ground surface. Conducting standard
penetration tests in bore holes as per IS: 2131, 1981 in all types of soils, during boring activity at
1.5m interval or at every change of strata whichever occurs earlier. The blow counts for SPT
Test shall be terminated when combined blow count exceeds 100 (called as refusal) for the last
300mm penetration of the sampler.

2.1 Collecting undisturbed & disturbed soil samples from soil strata at regular interval

Conducting following laboratory tests on representative soil samples.

a) Natural moisture content (IS: 2720, 1992 Part 2)

b) Dry density/Bulk Density (IS: 2720, 1992 Part 2)
c) Particle size analysis (IS: 2720, 1985 Part 4)
d) Atterberg’s limits (IS: 2720, 1985 Part 5)
e) Classification of soil (IS: 1498, 1970)
f) Specific gravity of soil (IS: 2720, 1992 Part 3)
g) Direct shear test on cohesion less specimen (IS: 2720, 1992 Part 13,)
h) Chemical Analysis on Soil Samples (IS: 2720 Part 26 & 27)
i) Settlement Analysis ( IS: 8009 part-1)
3.0 SITE EXPLORATION:
The required equipment’s and team were mobilized to the site for carrying out the required field
work. The locations of the bore holes and depths adopted were given by the engineer – in –
charge. The entire bore holes and tests were carried out in the presence of the representative of
site-in-charge.

3.1 The standard penetration tests were conducted at 1.5m intervals during the advancement of
boreholes.
3.2 For conducting SPT, IS Code: 2131-1981 / was followed. After reaching the required depth of test,
the bottom of the bore hole was cleaned properly and spoon is properly and centrally seated in
position in the borehole. Standard split spoon sampler attached to lower end of “A” drill rods was
driven in the bore holes by means of standard hammer of 63.5kg falling freely from a height of
75 cm. The sampler was driven 45 cm. and the number of blows required for each 15 cm.
penetration were recorded. The number of blows for the first 15 cm penetration was considered as
seating drive. The number of blows for last 30 cm. penetration was designated as SPT ‘N’ value.
SPT soilsamples obtained from standard split spoon sampler for all the above standard penetration
tests were collected in polythene bags, sealed, labeled and sent to the laboratory for testing.
3.3 The undisturbed soil samples were collected in good quality thin walled sample tubes, of min. dia
of 100mm and length of 450mm with area ratio less than 15%. The UDS tubes are gently pushed
in soil using hydraulic push rig/gently hammering action. After retrieval of UDS tube from the
borehole, ends of the tube with sample were sealed withfreshly molten wax of minimum 20mm
thick, properly labeled, marked an arrow
showing upward direction and dispatched to laboratory for testing. At site, sample tubes were
covered with wet gunny bags. When the UDS tubes were not penetrated into the subsoil strata, it
was clearly mentioned on the bore log sheet.

3.4 Natural moisture contents of soil samples from the boreholes at different depths weremeasured

in the laboratory and the values are indicated in laboratory test results in Bore Log table.

4.0 LABORATORY TESTING

The relevant laboratory tests were conducted on representative subsoil samples in our well-
equipped laboratory. The step by step procedure of various laboratory tests are described below.
4.1 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

For this purpose an oven dry pulverized soil sample is sieved through the set of sieves 4.75mm,
2.0mm, 4.25micron, and 75micron. The amounts of soil retained on each sieve are noted down.
The % retained, cumulative % retained and % passing are computed by these retained weights.
If the % passing 75 micron sieve is appreciable, Hydrometer method is used to find the %
fraction of particle sizes from 75micron to 2micron.

4.2 LIQUID LIMIT

For liquid limit, Casagrande apparatus is used. For this test air dry soil sample passing 425micron is
taken and mixed with distilled water to give a stiff and homogeneous pasteand is left for sufficient
time for maturing in an air tight container. A portion of the above paste is kept in the cup of
Casagrande apparatus, a groove is cut with groove cutting tooland blows are imparted by turning the
handle at the rate of 2 revolutions per second. The numbers of blows are counted till the continuous
contact of the bottom of the groove occurs. Few quantity of soil from the close portion of the groove
after the contact occurs,are taken and its water content is determined by oven drying method.

4.3 PLASTIC LIMIT

For this test sample is prepared in the same way as for liquid limit test. A ball is formed ofsub
sample weighting about 5 gm. This ball is rolled between the fingers of one hand and the glass plate
with pressure sufficient to reduce the mass into a thread of about 3mm in 5 to10 complete forward
and back movements. When a diameter of 3mm is reached, soil isagain remolded into a ball.
The process of rolling and remolding is repeated until the threada start just crumbing at a diameter
of 3mm.The crumbled thread is immediately transferredto an air tight container for determination of
its moisture content by oven drying method.
This water content is termed as plastic limit. (wp)

PLASTICITY INDEX
The plasticity index Ip is given by
Ip=wL –wp
4.4 WATER CONTENT
For this test the soil sample of known quantity (wm) is taken in a container.
The container with this soil sample is placed in an oven for drying at 105-110ºc for 16-24 hours. After
drying the dry sample is again weighed to determine the dry weight of sample (wd)
The moisture content is computed by the following equation:
wN = (w m-wd)/wd

4.5 DRY DENSITY & BULK DENSITY

For determination of bulk density, a sample of known volume ‘V’ is extracted from the
Undisturbed sample. Its bulk weight ‘W’ and moisture content ‘wN’ is determined by oven drying
method.The bulk density is determined by following equation γb = W/V and dry density γd = γb
/(1+wN)

4.6 SPECIFIC GRAVITY

The specific gravity of soil sample is determined by density bottle method. For this test 5-10g (w2)
sample of oven dry, cool soil is taken in 50ml capacity density bottle and its weight is noted down. The
soil is covered with distilled water and left for sufficient period for suitable soaking. The entrapped air is
removed by vacuum. The soil in bottle is filled full with water and its weight is noted down as w3. The
mass of empty bottle (w1) and bottle with full distilled water also noted (w4).
The specific gravity is found by the following equation. G=w2-w1/[(w2-w1)-(w3-w4)]

4.7 DIRECT SHEAR TEST

For this test shear box test apparatus is used. The prepared specimen from remolded/undisturbed sample
is placed carefully in the box. The plain grid is kept on top of the specimen with its serrations at right
angles to the direction of shear. The upper porous stone is placed on the grid and loading pad on the
stone. The box with specimen is gently placed in the container (water jacket). The specimen is
submerged with water. The container is mounted with the shear box and the specimen inside, on the
shearing machine. The upper part of the box is so adjusted that it touches the proving ring. The jack is
brought forward to bear up against the box container. The proving ring dial gauge is set to read zero.
The steel ball is placed in the recess of the loading pad. The loading yoke is set in contact with the steel
ball on the loading pad. Vertical displacement dial gauge to read zero in contact with the top of the yoke.
The normal load is applied and any change in thickness of specimen is recorded. Shear displacement dial
gauge is also set to read zero.
The locking screw is now removed and two parts of the shear box are separated by advancing the spacing
screws. The specimen is sheared at constant rate of strain. The readings of the proving ring dial gauge are
noted down every 15 seconds for the first one minute and then every 30 seconds thereafter. The reading
of change in the thickness dial gauge and shear displacement dial gauge are also recorded at the same
time interval. The test is continued until the specimen fails. The specimen is assumed to fail when the
proving ring dial gauge starts receding or at shear displacement of approximately 15% of the length takes
place.
The soil is removed from the box and test is repeated on the identical specimen under increased normal
load. For consolidated undrained test the specimen is prepared and set in the apparatus as above and after
submergence, the specimen is allowed to consolidate fully under normal loads. The specimen is then
sheared as in undrained test. At the end of the test, the specimen is removed and its final water content is
determined. The test is repeated on other identical specimen in similar way under increasing normal
loads. For drained test, after completion of consolidation under a particular normal load, specimen is
sheared at a slow rate to allow the pore water pressure inside the specimen may be drained out i.e.
completely dissipated. Final water content of failed specimen is determined. The test is repeated on other
identical.

5.0 GROUND WATER LEVEL

Location Ground Water Level

Depth of Bore Hole (m)
(m)
BH – 1 Met 6.0

BH – 2 Met 6.0

BH – 3 Met 6.0
 6.0 PROPOSED DEPTH & TYPE OF FOUNDATIONS

Based upon the results of field investigations, laboratory test results, & further discussions held with the
client, the following type of foundations have been analyzed here in below : -

6.1 SHEAR FAILURE CRITERION:

The net safe bearing capacity of sub-soil strata has been computed by considering local shear failure
using the following equation for calculating the net ultimate bearing capacity.
Qnu = 2/3. c.Nc. sc.dc.ic + q.(Nq–1).sq.dq.iq + ½.γ.B.Nr.sr.dr.ir.w’

Shape factors & bearing factors are used in calculation as per their suitability.

CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF FAILURE TYPE OF STRATUM .

In SBC calculations failure criteria of stratum play most significant role: There are mainly two criteria as
mentioned below which helps in predicting whereas local, punching and general failures will occur.
a. As per Terzaghi’s, if angle of internal friction is Ɵ ≤ 29 completely local failure occurred, for Ɵ> 36
general shear failure will considered and when angle of internal friction lies between 29-36 then
intermediate interpolation should be practiced.
b. As per Table-3 IS 6403, if void raio is e ≤ 0.55 ( RD- Dense) completely General Shear Failure will
occurred, for e > 0.75, local shear failuire will be considered and when void ration lies between 0.55 and
0.75, then intermediate interpolation should be practiced.
But for the stability and durability of structure whichever of above gives least SBC values should be used in
computation of stratum’s resistance against upcoming vertical pressure. In this report Terzaghi’s
criteria has practiced because actual void ratio of layer beneath ESL maybe deviated from actual due
to numbers of factors like personnel error, influence of water table, sampling procedure, chemical
reaction and natural moisture,
Here SBC is calculated on behalf of local shear failure because the values of angle of internal friction and
state of strata usually shows loose to medium denseness, which meets the nearby criteria of local shear failure
than general shear failure
 6.2 SETTLEMENT FAILURE CRITERION:

The settlement of cohesion less layers below the foundation level and up to the zone of Influence are
computed by using the chart of settlement Vs SPT ‘N’ given on page 17 of IS 8009, part-I.
The relevant soil parameters have been adopted from the bore log enclosed with the report.
The values of settlement obtained as above are corrected applying the Fox’s depth correction factor and
rigidity factor.

SPT EQUIPMENT DETAIL:

Hammer Efficiency 63.5 kg

Length of rod 1.50 meter

Guide rod with clear spacing 750 mm

Split spoon sampler for collecting sample

7.0 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SHALLOW FOUNDATION

On the basis of above Geotechnical investigation the following recommendations are suggested:

BH-1 Net Safe Bearing Capacity

Depth of
Location: foundation Size of
below existing Foundation Allowable Pressure Intensity (T/m2 )
ground surface (m)
(m) In Shear In Recommended SBC
Settlement (T/m2) After
(Kn/m²) (mm) F.O.S
Village- M ohammadpur, 10.64
2.5 6.0 X 9.0 260.92 24.17
Kharagpur Ahatmali.
3.0 6.0 X 9.0 370.39 31.44 15.11

4.0 6.0 X 9.0 432.01 36.07 17.62

BH-2
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Depth of
Location: foundation Size of
below existing Foundation Allowable Pressure Intensity (T/m2 )
ground surface (m)
(m) In Shear In Recommended SBC
Settlement (T/m2) After
(Kn/m²) (mm) F.O.S
Village- M ohammadpur, 11.25
2.5 6.0 X 9.0 275.91 28.00
Kharagpur Ahatmali.
3.0 6.0 X 9.0 330.42 31.70 13.48

4.0 6.0 X 9.0 480.41 40.11 19.59

BH-3
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Depth of
Location: foundation Size of
below existing Foundation Allowable Pressure Intensity (T/m2 )
ground surface (m)
(m) In Shear In Recommended SBC
Settlement (T/m2) After
(Kn/m²) (mm) F.O.S
Village- M ohammadpur, 10.35
2.5 6.0 X 9.0 253.81 27.73
Kharagpur Ahatmali.
3.0 6.0 X 9.0 363.48 34.88 14.83

4.0 6.0 X 9.0 483.04 40.33 19.70

NOTE: As per IS-1904(1966): The maximum permissible settlement for isolated foundations is 40mm on sandy soil and
65mm in clayey soils. The permissible settlement for the raft foundation on clay soil is 65-100 mm. Hence our investigated
soil in settlement criteria, if settlement consideration is 40mm in Design of Building,& SBC Also changed if range of
Settlement changed.
 CONCLUSION FOR DEEP/PILE FOUNDATION

Pile
Length
Pile Pile Safe Pile Safe Pile
Below
Bore Hole Diame Cut-off Capacity Capacity
Cut-off
ter Length (compression) (Uplift)
Level
(mm) (m) (m) (Tonnes) (Tonnes)

11.20 94.71 50.92

BH-1 14.20 1.80 179.92 73.26
1200
15.00 247.01 80.43
11.20 119.69 59.20
BH-2 1200 14.20 1.80 201.37 85.62
15.00 242.26 93.36
11.20 103.02 57.30
BH-3 1200 14.20 1.80 170.54 61.70
15.00 228.27 89.52
 8.0 CLOSURE

We appreciate the opportunity to submit this Soil Investigation Report. The above recommendations
have been made on the basis of in situ tests and laboratory tests conducted on the samples collected
from the boreholes bored at the locations given by the client. If during excavation, any unusual or
abnormal features are noticed, these may be brought to the attention of geotechnical consultant before
proceeding with construction work for further suggestions.

9.0 BORE LOG DATA

LABORATORY TEST PARAMETER

 BH-1

BOREHOLE NO: 01

REDUCED LEVEL OF B/HOLE: 100.00 meter WATER TABLE LEVEL : Encountered Upto 6.0 Meter

Field Consolidation
Effective Overburden Pressure (kN/m2)

Sample Discription Grain Size analysis Index Properties Shear Parameter

Properties
Observation
Respective Depth From Natural

Angle of Internal Friction (Φ)

Atterberg’s Limits

Field Moisture Content (%)

Soil Classification As per
Surface Level (Meters)
Elevation in Meter

Bulk Density (Kn/m³)

Compression index
Cohesion (kg/cm2)
Corrected N Value
Observed N Value
Nature of Sample

REPRESENTATION

indian Standard
Depth in Meter

Specific Gravity
PLASTICITY INDEX
Gravel %

Void Ratio
SYMBOLIC

Sand %

Plastic Limit (%)

Clay %

Liquid Limit (%)

Silt %
99.79 1.0 0.00 - 1.00
15.88 DS 0 0 - - - - -- -- -- 15.88 8.68 2.62 -- -- 0.759 -

2.0 1.50 - 1.95

31.78 SPT 3 4 0 40 32 28 24.5 18.6 5.9 15.90 9.90 2.63 0.783 -

3.0 2.50 - 2.80

47.99 UDS - - 0 35 30 35 16.21 12.45 2.64 26.0 0.07 0.797
Da rk Browni s h Sa ndy
95.79 4.0 3.00 - 3.45
64.30 SPT Soi l ha vi ng l ow to medi um 4 5 - - - 26.3 19.1 7.2 16.31 16.50 2.62 0.836 0.170
pl a s ti ci ty- (SM-SC)
5.0 4.50 - 4.95
70.75 SPT 8 9 - - - 16.45 18.20 2.63 26.0 0.08 0.854 --

6.0 5.50 - 5.80

77.50 UDS -- -- 0 29 22 49 -- -- -- 16.75 17.40 2.60 -- 0.788 0.155

92.79 7.0 6.00 - 6.45

84.60 SPT 12 14 0 24 21 55 24.3 16.2 8.1 17.10 18.50 2.62 26.0 0.07 0.781 --

8.0 7.50 - 7.95

91.58 SPT 14 15 - - 16.98 20.60 2.62 27.0 0.00 0.825 0.167

9.0 8.50 - 8.80

98.79 UDS Da rk Browni s h - - 0 55 32 13 - - - 17.21 16.40 2.64 28.0 0.0 0.752 -
s a ndy s oi l wi th
10.0 9.00 - 9.45
106.09 SPT l ow pl a s ti ci ty- (SM-SP) 13 14 - - - NON PLASTIC 17.30 15.50 2.64 0.729 -
88.79 11.0 10.50 - 10.95
113.49 SPT 14 15 - - - - - - 17.40 16.20 2.63 -- -- 0.723 -
12.0 12.00 - 12.45
120.84 SPT 15 15 - - - NON PLASTIC 17.35 16.10 2.63 34.0 0.0 0.726 0.137
Ri ver s a nd wi th fi nes
13.0 13.50 -13.95
128.13 UDS s a nd ha vi ng No pl a s ti ci ty- - - 0 62 31 7 - - - 17.29 15.20 2.64 35.0 0.0 0.726 -
(SM-SP)
14.0 15.00 - 15.45
135.48 SPT 14 14 - - - - - - 17.35 13.21 2.64 0.690 -
 BH-1 (STANDARD PENETRATION CURVE)

11.50

9.50

7.50
DEPTH IN METER

Observed Value
Corrected Value
5.50

3.50

1.50

0 10 20 30 40 50 60
-0.50

N- VALUE
 BH-2

BOREHOLE NO: 02

REDUCED LEVEL OF B/HOLE: 100.00 meter WATER TABLE LEVEL :Encountered Upto 6.0 Meter

Field Consolidation
Effective Overburden Pressure (kN/m2)

Sample Discription Grain Size analysis Index Properties Shear Parameter

Properties
Observation
Respective Depth From Natural

Angle of Internal Friction (Φ)

Atterberg’s Limits

Field Moisture Content (%)

Soil Classification As per
Surface Level (Meters)
Elevation in Meter

Bulk Density (Kn/m³)

Compression index
Cohesion (kg/cm2)
Corrected N Value
Observed N Value
Nature of Sample

REPRESENTATION

indian Standard
Depth in Meter

Specific Gravity
PLASTICITY INDEX
Gravel %

Void Ratio
SYMBOLIC

Sand %

Plastic Limit (%)

Clay %

Liquid Limit (%)

Silt %
99.81 1.0 0.00 - 1.00
15.56 DS 0 0 - - - - -- -- -- 15.56 8.40 2.63 -- -- 0.797 -

2.0 1.50 - 1.95

31.36 SPT 3 4 0 44 27 29 26.2 19.0 7.2 15.80 8.69 2.64 0.782 -

3.0 2.50 - 2.80

47.46 UDS - - 0 36 25 39 16.10 12.60 2.65 27.0 0.06 0.818
Da rk Browni s h Sa ndy
95.81 4.0 3.00 - 3.45
63.74 SPT Soi l ha vi ng l ow to medi um 5 6 - - - 25.4 18.8 6.6 16.28 15.50 2.63 0.830 0.168
pl a s ti ci ty- (SM-SC)
5.0 4.50 - 4.95
70.24 SPT 7 8 - - - 16.50 19.10 2.62 27.0 0.07 0.855 --

6.0 5.50 - 5.80

77.03 UDS -- -- 0 34 20 46 -- -- -- 16.79 18.50 2.61 -- 0.807 0.161

92.81 7.0 6.00 - 6.45

84.27 SPT 9 13 0 26 24 50 25.5 17.9 7.6 17.24 18.62 2.62 27.0 0.07 0.768 --

8.0 7.50 - 7.95

91.49 SPT 11 13 - - 17.22 19.80 2.63 26.0 0.07 0.795 0.157

9.0 8.50 - 8.80

98.79 UDS Da rk Browni s h - - 0 57 32 11 - - - 17.30 17.20 2.64 28.0 0.0 0.755 -
s a ndy s oi l wi th
10.0 9.00 - 9.45
106.07 SPT l ow pl a s ti ci ty- (SM-SP) 14 15 - - - NON PLASTIC 17.28 16.50 2.65 0.753 -
88.81 11.0 10.50 - 10.95
113.17 SPT 14 15 - - - - - - 17.10 15.50 2.65 -- -- 0.756 -
12.0 12.00 - 12.45
120.36 SPT 15 15 - - - NON PLASTIC 17.19 16.80 2.64 33.0 0.0 0.760 0.147
Ri ver s a nd wi th fi nes
13.0 13.50 -13.95
127.73 UDS s a nd ha vi ng No pl a s ti ci ty- - - 0 60 30 10 - - - 17.37 16.90 2.62 33.0 0.0 0.730 -
(SM-SP)
14.0 15.00 - 15.45
135.15 SPT 15 15 - - - - - - 17.42 15.50 2.63 0.711 -
 BH-2 (STANDARD PENETRATION CURVE)

11.50

9.50

7.50
DEPTH IN METER

Observed Value
Corrected Value
5.50

3.50

1.50

0 10 20 30 40 50 60
-0.50

N- VALUE
 BH-3

BOREHOLE NO: 03

REDUCED LEVEL OF B/HOLE: 100.00 meter WATER TABLE LEVEL : Encountered Upto 6.0 Meter

Field Consolidation
Effective Overburden Pressure (kN/m2)

Sample Discription Grain Size analysis Index Properties Shear Parameter

Properties
Observation
Respective Depth From Natural

Angle of Internal Friction (Φ)

Atterberg’s Limits

Field Moisture Content (%)

Soil Classification As per
Surface Level (Meters)
Elevation in Meter

Bulk Density (Kn/m³)

Compression index
Cohesion (kg/cm2)
Corrected N Value
Observed N Value
Nature of Sample

REPRESENTATION

indian Standard
Depth in Meter

Specific Gravity
PLASTICITY INDEX
Gravel %

Void Ratio
SYMBOLIC

Sand %

Plastic Limit (%)

Clay %

Liquid Limit (%)

Silt %
100.15 1.0 0.00 - 1.00
16.10 DS 0 0 - - - - -- -- -- 16.10 7.90 2.62 -- -- 0.723 -

2.0 1.50 - 1.95

32.35 SPT 2 3 0 38 35 27 25 18 7 16.25 8.25 2.63 0.719 -

3.0 2.50 - 2.80

48.74 UDS - - 0 40 28 32 16.39 9.20 2.64 27.0 0.05 0.726
Da rk Browni s h Sa ndy
96.15 4.0 3.00 - 3.45
65.44 SPT Soi l ha vi ng l ow to medi um 3 4 - - - 26 18.5 7.5 16.70 14.20 2.62 0.06 0.758 0.146
pl a s ti ci ty- (SM-SC)
5.0 4.50 - 4.95
72.19 SPT 7 8 - - - 16.75 15.00 2.63 26.0 0.07 0.771 --

6.0 5.50 - 5.80

79.09 UDS -- -- 0 33 23 44 -- -- -- 16.90 17.40 2.60 -- 0.772 0.151

93.15 7.0 6.00 - 6.45

86.29 SPT 8 12 0 31 25 44 26.4 18.7 7.7 17.20 18.50 2.62 26.0 0.06 0.771 --

8.0 7.50 - 7.95

93.09 SPT 11 13 - - 16.80 18.00 2.62 27.0 0.07 0.805 0.161

9.0 8.50 - 8.80

99.89 UDS Da rk Browni s h - - 0 51 34 15 - - - 16.80 16.40 2.64 28.0 0.0 0.794 -
s a ndy s oi l wi th
10.0 9.00 - 9.45
106.79 SPT l ow pl a s ti ci ty- (SM-SP) 14 15 - - - NON PLASTIC 16.90 15.50 2.64 0.770 -
89.15 11.0 10.50 - 10.95
114.03 SPT 15 15 - - - - - - 17.24 15.20 2.63 -- -- 0.724 -
12.0 12.00 - 12.45
121.13 SPT 17 16 - - - NON PLASTIC 17.10 16.90 2.63 34.0 0.0 0.764 0.148
Ri ver s a nd wi th fi nes
13.0 13.50 -13.95
128.13 UDS s a nd ha vi ng No pl a s ti ci ty- - - 0 59 35 6 - - - 17.00 16.98 2.64 35.0 0.0 0.782 -
(SM-SP)
14.0 15.00 - 15.45
135.15 SPT 15 15 - - - - - - 17.02 15.21 2.64 0.753 -
 BH-3 (STANDARD PENETRATION CURVE)

11.50

9.50

7.50
DEPTH IN METER

Observed Value
Corrected Value
5.50

3.50

1.50

0 10 20 30 40 50 60
-0.50

N- VALUE
 Typical Computation of Liquefaction Potential by Simplified Method

Location: BH- 1 Actual Water table Depth : 6.00 m

Water table assumed for Calculation : 5.00 m
Earthquake Zone 4 PGA/Zone fac. = 0.24

Overburden correction fac.-C N

2

Overburden Pressure at Time

Effective overburden (s o), t/m
Stress reduction coefficient

Total overburden pressure

Submerged Density (t/m )

Cyclic Stress ratio (CSR)

Density at time of drilling

3
Saturated density (t/m )
3

SPT corrected (N1)60

Observed SPT Value
Depth below EGL, m

Fine Content ( % )
Type of Strata

Conclusion
of Drilling

CRRM = 7.5
2
(s o), t/m

(N1)60cs
(t/m )

CRR

FOS
3

(rd)

CE

CB

CR

CS

β
1.00 SM-SC - 1.59 1.59 - - - 1.59 1.59 - 1.59 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2.00 SM-SC 3 1.59 1.59 1.59 60.00 0.98 3.18 3.18 0.15 3.18 1.70 0.75 1.05 0.75 1.00 3.01 5.00 1.20 8.61 0.10 0.10 0.66 Liquefiable

3.00 SM-SC - 1.62 1.62 - - - 4.80 4.80 - 4.80 1.44 - - - - - - - - - - - -

4.00 SM-SC 4 1.63 1.63 1.63 68.00 0.97 6.43 6.43 0.15 6.43 1.25 0.75 1.05 0.80 3.00 9.43 5.00 1.20 16.31 0.17 0.17 1.15 Non Liquefiable

5.00 SM-SC 8 1.64 1.64 0.64 68.00 0.96 8.07 8.07 0.15 8.07 1.11 0.75 1.05 0.85 4.00 23.84 5.00 1.20 33.61 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

6.00 SM-SC - 1.66 1.66 - - - 9.73 8.73 - 9.73 1.01 - - - - - - - - - - - -

7.00 SM-SC 12 1.71 1.71 0.71 76.00 0.95 11.44 9.44 0.18 11.44 0.93 0.75 1.05 0.95 6.00 50.36 5.00 1.20 65.43 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

8.00 SM-SP 14 1.70 1.70 0.70 76.00 0.94 13.14 10.14 0.19 13.14 0.87 0.75 1.05 0.95 7.00 63.96 5.00 1.20 81.75 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

9.00 SM-SP - 1.72 1.72 - - - 14.86 10.86 - 14.86 0.96 - - - - - - - - - - - -

10.00 SM-SP 13 1.73 1.73 0.73 45.00 0.91 16.59 11.59 0.11 16.59 0.93 0.75 1.05 0.95 9.00 81.31 5.00 1.20 102.57 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

11.00 SM-SP 14 1.74 1.74 0.74 45.00 0.88 18.33 12.33 0.11 18.33 0.90 0.75 1.05 1 10.00 99.29 5.00 1.20 124.15 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

12.00 SM-SP 15 1.73 1.73 0.73 45.00 0.85 20.06 13.06 0.11 20.06 0.88 0.75 1.05 1 11.00 113.70 5.00 1.20 141.44 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

13.00 SM-SP - 1.73 1.73 - - - 21.79 13.79 - 21.79 0.85 - - - - - - - - - - - -

14.00 SM-SP 14 1.73 1.73 0.73 0.00 0.80 23.52 14.52 0.11 23.52 0.83 - - - - - - - - - - - -

1) The project site falls in Zone - IV. A maximum earthquake intensity of 7.0 has been considered in the analysis.
2) The Design ground acceleration amax/g = 0.24
3) CE = Correction for hammer energy ratio = ER/60, ER for Rope and pully System = 60 % , Hence C E = 60/60 = 1.00
4) Borehole diameter = 150 mm , Hence C B = 1.05
5) CS = Correction for Standard sampler = 1.00
6) Magnitude scaling factor (MSF) = 1.0 has been taken in the analysis for an earthquake magnitude of 7.5. ( Recommened revised MSF)
 Typical Computation of Liquefaction Potential by Simplified Method

Location: BH- 2 Actual Water table Depth : 6.00 m

Water table assumed for Calculation : 5.00 m
Earthquake Zone 4 PGA/Zone fac. = 0.24

Overburden correction fac.-C N

2

Overburden Pressure at Time

Effective overburden (s o), t/m
Stress reduction coefficient

Total overburden pressure

Submerged Density (t/m )

Cyclic Stress ratio (CSR)

Density at time of drilling

3
Saturated density (t/m )
3

SPT corrected (N1)60

Observed SPT Value
Depth below EGL, m

Fine Content ( % )
Type of Strata

Conclusion
of Drilling

CRR M = 7.5
2
(s o), t/m

(N 1)60cs
(t/m )

CRR

FOS
3

(rd)

CE

CB

CR

CS

β
1.00 SM-SC - 1.56 1.56 - - - 1.56 1.56 - 1.56 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2.00 SM-SC 3 1.58 1.58 1.58 56.00 0.98 3.14 3.14 0.15 3.14 1.70 0.75 1.05 0.75 1.00 3.01 5.00 1.20 8.61 0.10 0.10 0.66 Liquefiable

3.00 SM-SC - 1.61 1.61 - - - 4.75 4.75 - 4.75 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

4.00 SM-SC 5 1.63 1.63 1.63 66.00 0.97 6.38 6.38 0.15 6.38 1.25 0.75 2.05 0.80 2.00 15.40 5.00 1.20 23.48 0.26 0.26 1.75 Non Liquefiable

5.00 SM-SC 7 1.65 1.65 0.65 62.00 0.96 8.03 8.03 0.15 8.03 1.12 0.75 2.05 0.85 3.00 30.63 5.00 1.20 41.75 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

6.00 SM-SC - 1.68 1.68 - - - 9.71 8.71 - 9.71 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7.00 SM-SC 9 1.72 1.72 - - - 11.43 9.43 - 11.43 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

8.00 SM-SP 11 1.72 1.72 0.72 50.00 0.94 13.15 10.15 0.19 13.15 0.87 0.75 1.05 0.95 2.00 14.35 5.00 1.20 22.22 0.25 0.25 1.29 Non Liquefiable

9.00 SM-SP - 1.73 1.73 - - - 14.88 10.88 - 14.88 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

10.00 SM-SP 14 1.73 1.73 0.73 42.00 0.91 16.61 11.61 0.11 16.61 0.93 0.75 1.05 0.95 4.00 38.88 5.00 1.20 51.66 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

11.00 SM-SP 14 1.71 1.71 - - - 18.32 12.32 - 18.32 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

12.00 SM-SP 15 1.72 1.72 - - - 20.04 13.04 - 20.04 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

13.00 SM-SP - 1.74 1.74 - - - 21.78 13.78 - 21.78 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

14.00 SM-SP 15 1.74 1.74 0.74 44.00 0.80 23.52 14.52 0.11 23.52 0.83 0.75 1.05 1 1.00 9.80 5.00 1.20 16.76 0.18 0.18 1.63 Non Liquefiable

1) The project site falls in Zone - IV. A maximum earthquake intensity of 7.0 has been considered in the analysis.
2) The Design ground acceleration amax/g = 0.24
3) CE = Correction for hammer energy ratio = ER/60, ER for Rope and pully System = 60 % , Hence C E = 60/60 = 1.00
4) Borehole diameter = 150 mm , Hence C B = 1.05
5) CS = Correction for Standard sampler = 1.00
6) Magnitude scaling factor (MSF) = 1.0 has been taken in the analysis for an earthquake magnitude of 7.5. ( Recommened revised MSF)
 Typical Computation of Liquefaction Potential by Simplified Method

Location: BH- 3 Actual Water table Depth : 6.00 m

Water table assumed for Calculation : 5.00 m
Earthquake Zone 4 PGA/Zone fac. = 0.24

Overburden correction fac.-C N

2

Overburden Pressure at Time

Effective overburden (s o), t/m
Stress reduction coefficient

Total overburden pressure

Submerged Density (t/m )

Cyclic Stress ratio (CSR)

Density at time of drilling

3
Saturated density (t/m )
3

SPT corrected (N1)60

Observed SPT Value
Depth below EGL, m

Fine Content ( % )
Type of Strata

Conclusion
of Drilling

CRRM = 7.5
2
(s o), t/m

(N1)60cs
(t/m )

CRR

FOS
3

(rd)

CE

CB

CR

CS

β
1.00 SM-SC - 1.61 1.61 1.61 - - 1.61 1.61 - 1.61 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2.00 SM-SC 2 1.62 1.62 1.62 56.00 0.98 3.23 3.23 0.15 3.23 1.70 0.75 1.05 0.75 1.00 2.01 5.00 1.20 7.41 0.09 0.09 0.59 Liquefiable

3.00 SM-SC - 1.64 1.64 1.64 64.00 0.98 4.87 4.87 - 4.87 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

4.00 SM-SC 3 1.67 1.67 1.67 66.00 0.97 6.54 6.54 0.15 6.54 1.24 0.75 1.05 0.80 3.00 7.01 5.00 1.20 13.41 0.14 0.14 0.96 Liquefiable

5.00 SM-SC 7 1.68 1.68 0.68 74.00 0.96 8.22 8.22 0.15 8.22 1.10 0.75 1.05 0.85 4.00 20.67 5.00 1.20 29.81 0.45 0.45 3.03 Non Liquefiable

6.00 SM-SC - 1.69 1.69 0.69 50.00 0.95 9.91 8.91 - 9.91 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7.00 SM-SC 8 1.72 1.72 0.72 43.00 0.95 11.63 9.63 0.18 11.63 0.93 0.75 1.05 0.95 6.00 33.30 5.00 1.20 44.96 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

8.00 SM-SP 11 1.68 1.68 0.68 42.00 0.94 13.31 10.31 0.19 13.31 0.87 0.75 1.05 0.95 7.00 49.93 5.00 1.20 64.92 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

9.00 SM-SP - 1.68 1.68 0.68 43.00 0.93 14.99 10.99 - 14.99 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

10.00 SM-SP 14 1.69 1.69 0.69 42.00 0.91 16.68 11.68 0.11 16.68 0.77 0.75 1.05 0.95 9.00 72.99 5.00 1.20 92.58 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

11.00 SM-SP 15 1.72 1.72 0.72 40.00 0.88 18.40 12.40 0.11 18.40 0.74 0.75 1.05 1 10.00 87.08 5.00 1.20 109.50 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

12.00 SM-SP 17 1.71 1.71 0.71 42.00 0.85 20.11 13.11 0.11 20.11 0.71 0.75 1.05 1 11.00 103.85 5.00 1.20 129.61 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

13.00 SM-SP - 1.70 1.70 0.70 40.00 0.83 21.81 13.81 - 21.81 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

14.00 SM-SP 15 1.70 1.70 0.70 44.00 0.80 23.51 14.51 0.11 23.51 0.65 0.75 1.05 1 13.00 100.15 5.00 1.20 125.18 NA NA >1 Non Liquefiable

1) The project site falls in Zone - IV. A maximum earthquake intensity of 7.0 has been considered in the analysis.
2) The Design ground acceleration amax/g = 0.24
3) CE = Correction for hammer energy ratio = ER/60, ER for Rope and pully System = 60 % , Hence C E = 60/60 = 1.00
4) Borehole diameter = 150 mm , Hence C B = 1.05
5) CS = Correction for Standard sampler = 1.00
6) Magnitude scaling factor (MSF) = 1.0 has been taken in the analysis for an earthquake magnitude of 7.5. ( Recommened revised MSF)
 BEARING CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR SHALLOW
FOUNDATIONS
LAYERED SOILS Analysis as per IS 6403-1981

BH-1 Net Safe Bearing Capacity

Depth of
Location: foundation Size of
below existing Foundation Allowable Pressure Intensity (T/m2 )
ground surface (m)
(m) In Shear In Recommended SBC
Settlement (T/m2) After
(Kn/m²) (mm) F.O.S
Village- M ohammadpur, 10.64
2.5 6.0 X 9.0 260.92 24.17
Kharagpur Ahatmali.
3.0 6.0 X 9.0 370.39 31.44 15.11

4.0 6.0 X 9.0 432.01 36.07 17.62

BH-1 Assumption & factors

Width (Mtr.) 6.0 6.0 6.0
Length (Mtr.) 9.0 9.0 9.0
Depth for Foundation 2.5 3.0 4.0
Corrected Frictional Angle for local failure Ø 17.4 18.1 18.8
Cohesion (kn/m²) 7.85 6.87 0.00
Effe.Pressure (kn/m³) 31.78 47.99 64.30
Submerged Unit Weight (kn/m³) 6.75 7.10 6.98
Water Table Correction 0.5 0.5 0.5

BH-1 Bearing Capacity Factor Depth Factor

Depth (m) 2.5 3.0 4.0 Depth (m) 2.5 3.0 4.0
Nc 12.52 13.29 14.06 Dc 1.11 1.14 1.19
Nq 4.92 5.41 5.91 Dq 1.06 1.07 1.09
Ny 3.74 4.23 4.83 Dy 1.06 1.07 1.09
Shape Factor Inclination Factor
Sc 1.13 1.13 1.13 Ic 1 1 1
Sq 1.13 1.13 1.13 Iq 1 1 1
Sy 0.73 0.73 0.73 Iy 1 1 1
 BH-2
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Depth of
Location: foundation Size of
below existing Foundation Allowable Pressure Intensity (T/m2 )
ground surface (m)
(m) In Shear In Recommended SBC
Settlement (T/m2) After
(Kn/m²) (mm) F.O.S
Village- M ohammadpur, 11.25
2.5 6.0 X 9.0 275.91 28.00
Kharagpur Ahatmali.
3.0 6.0 X 9.0 330.42 31.70 13.48

4.0 6.0 X 9.0 480.41 40.11 19.59

BH-2 Assumption & factors

Width (Mtr.) 6.0 6.0 6.0
Length (Mtr.) 9.0 9.0 9.0
Depth for Foundation 2.5 3.0 4.0
Corrected Frictional Angle for local failure Ø 18.1 17.4 18.8
Cohesion (kn/m²) 6.87 6.87 6.87
Effe.Pressure (kn/m³) 31.36 47.46 63.74
Submerged Unit Weight (kn/m³) 6.79 7.24 7.22
Water Table Correction 0.5 0.5 0.5

BH-2 Bearing Capacity Factor Depth Factor

Depth (m) 2.5 3.0 4.0 Depth (m) 2.5 3.0 4.0
Nc 13.29 12.52 13.90 Dc 1.11 1.13 1.19
Nq 5.41 4.92 5.50 Dq 1.06 1.07 1.09
Ny 4.23 3.74 4.55 Dy 1.06 1.07 1.09
Shape Factor Inclination Factor
Sc 1.13 1.13 1.13 Ic 1 1 1
Sq 1.13 1.13 1.13 Iq 1 1 1
Sy 0.73 0.73 0.73 Iy 1 1 1
 BH-3
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Depth of
Location: foundation Size of
below existing Foundation Allowable Pressure Intensity (T/m2 )
ground surface (m)
(m) In Shear In Recommended SBC
Settlement (T/m2) After
(Kn/m²) (mm) F.O.S
Village- M ohammadpur, 10.35
2.5 6.0 X 9.0 253.81 27.73
Kharagpur Ahatmali.
3.0 6.0 X 9.0 363.48 34.88 14.83

4.0 6.0 X 9.0 483.04 40.33 19.70

BH-3 Assumption & factors

Width (Mtr.) 6.0 6.0 6.0
Length (Mtr.) 9.0 9.0 9.0
Depth for Foundation 2.5 3.0 4.0
Corrected Frictional Angle for local failure Ø 17.4 18.1 18.8
Cohesion (kn/m²) 6.87 5.89 7.06
Effe.Pressure (kn/m³) 32.35 48.74 65.44
Submerged Unit Weight (kn/m³) 6.90 7.20 6.80
Water Table Correction 0.5 0.5 0.5

BH-3 Bearing Capacity Factor Depth Factor

Depth (m) 2.5 3.0 4.0 Depth (m) 2.5 3.0 4.0
Nc 12.50 13.29 13.36 Dc 1.11 1.14 1.19
Nq 4.92 5.41 5.48 Dq 1.06 1.07 1.09
Ny 3.74 4.23 4.30 Dy 1.06 1.07 1.09
Shape Factor Inclination Factor
Sc 1.13 1.13 1.13 Ic 1 1 1
Sq 1.13 1.13 1.13 Iq 1 1 1
Sy 0.73 0.73 0.73 Iy 1 1 1
PILE FOUNDATION
CALCULATION
 SAFE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF BORED CAST IN SITU PILES AS PER IRC:78-2014
ESTIMATION OF VERTICAL COMPRESSIVE AND UPLIFT LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF BORED CAST IN-SITU CONCRETE PILE

NAME OF THE PROJECT

Pile Diameter (mm) 1200 Ground Water Table (m) 0.00 (Conservative side) FOS In Compression 3.00
BORE HOLE
Pile Cut off Length Below G.L(m) 1.80 Average Void Factor (%) 10.00 FOS In Uplift 2.50
Parameters of Pile
Reduced Level of Borehole (m) 100.000 Critical Depth (Pd Level) 20.00 X Pile Diameter Grade of Concrete (M) 35
1
Settlement (Assumed) 12.00 mm (1% of pile diameter) (Assumed)

Calculation sheet for Vertical Compressive and Uplift Load Carrying Capacity
Total
Pile Length Angle of Effective Total Effective Total Net Self
Type of RL of Layer RL of Layer Thickness of Submerged Ultimate Total Skin Total Ultimate pile Safe Pile Capacity Safe Pile Capacity
Layer no Below Cut- Cohesion Internal Bulk Density Overburde Overburden Bearing Capacity Factor Factors for Skin Friction Skin Weight of
Soil Layer Top Bottom Layer Bulk Density Pressure End Bearing friction capacity (compression) (Uplift)
off Level Friction n Pressure Friction pile
Capacity capacity

C Ø Pd Ru K Pdi tan δ Asi α Rf Qu= Ru+ Rf QuS

(m) (m) (m) (m) Kg/cm2 ° (gms/cc) (kN/m3) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) Nc Nq Nγ (kN) (kN/m2) (m2) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (Tonnes) (Tonnes)

1 SM-SC 2.20 98.200 96.000 2.20 0.07 26 1.59 5.79 12.73 12.73 9 10.67 12.54 1.50 6.36 0.49 8.29 1.00 95.56 12.52 5.92
272.67 95.56 31.35 368.22

2 SM-SC 5.20 96.000 93.000 3.00 0.08 26 1.62 6.08 18.24 30.97 9 10.67 12.54 1.50 21.85 0.49 11.31 1.00 365.08 29.58 17.98
505.19 269.52 74.10 870.27

3 SM-SC 8.20 93.000 90.000 3.00 0.07 27 1.68 6.67 20.01 50.98 9 12.73 14.47 1.50 40.97 0.51 11.31 1.00 796.89 56.63 34.67
869.37 431.81 116.85 1666.26

4 SM-SP 11.20 90.000 87.000 3.00 0.00 29 1.72 7.06 21.18 72.16 9 18.14 19.34 1.50 61.57 0.40 11.31 1.00 1213.60 94.71 50.92
1573.01 416.71 159.60 2786.61

5 SM-SP 14.20 87.000 84.000 3.00 0.00 32 1.76 7.45 22.36 94.52 9 30.85 30.21 1.50 83.34 0.45 11.31 1.00 1843.07 179.92 73.26
3450.46 629.48 202.35 5293.53

6 SM-SP 15.00 84.000 83.200 0.80 0.00 34 1.78 7.62 6.10 100.62 9 43.95 41.06 1.50 97.57 0.48 3.02 1.00 2053.60 247.01 80.43
5213.68 210.53 213.75 7267.28
 SAFE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF BORED CAST IN SITU PILES AS PER IS: 2911 (PART I/SECTION 2)-2010
ESTIMATION OF LATERAL LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF BORED CAST IN-SITU CONCRETE PILE

NAME OF THE PROJECT 0

Pile Diameter (mm) 1200 Ground Water Table (m) 0.00 3.00
(Conservative side) FOS In Compression
BORE HOLE
Pile Cut off Length Below G.L(m) 1.80 Average Void Factor (%) 10.00 2.50
Parameters of Pile FOS In Uplift

100.000 Critical Depth (Pd Level) 20.00 25

Reduced Level of Borehole (m) 1 X Pile Diameter Grade of Concrete (M)
Deflection (Assumed) (y) 12.00mm (1% of pile diameter) (Assumed)

Calculation sheet for Lateral Load Carrying Capacity

Preferable Pile Length Young's Moment of
Type of RL of Layer RL of Layer Thickness Cantilever
Layer no strata up to Below Cut- Cohesion SPT Value Value of Constant Modulus of Inertia of Stiffness factor Type of pile behaviour Depth of Fixity (Zf) Load Capacity of Pile (Lateral)
Soil Layer Top Bottom of Layer Length
depth off Level pile material Pile

C = Clay C N k1 ŋh Ec I R T e=L1 Free Head Fixed Head Free Head Fixed Head

S = Sand (m) (m) (m) (m) Kg/cm2 Average MN/m3 MN/m3 Mpa (m4) (m) (m) (m) (m) (kN) (Tonnes) (kN) (Tonnes)

1 SM-SC S 2.20 98.200 96.000 2.20 0.07 9.50 - 1.30 29580.40 0.10 - 4.71 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -

2 SM-SC S 5.20 96.000 93.000 3.00 0.08 12.50 - 1.76 29580.40 0.10 - 4.43 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -

3 SM-SC S 8.20 93.000 90.000 3.00 0.07 16.67 - 2.36 29580.40 0.10 - 4.18 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -

4 SM-SP S 11.20 90.000 87.000 3.00 0.00 20.88 - 2.97 29580.40 0.10 - 3.99 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -

5 SM-SP S 14.20 87.000 84.000 3.00 0.00 25.40 - 3.62 29580.40 0.10 - 3.84 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -

6 SM-SP S 15.00 84.000 83.200 0.80 0.00 28.92 - 4.12 29580.40 0.10 - 3.74 Long 779.46 79.48
0.00 7.10 8.22 302.61 30.86
 SAFE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF BORED CAST IN SITU PILES AS PER IRC:78-2014
ESTIMATION OF VERTICAL COMPRESSIVE AND UPLIFT LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF BORED CAST IN-SITU CONCRETE PILE

NAME OF THE PROJECT

Pile Diameter (mm) 1200 Ground Water Table (m) 0.00 (Conservative side) FOS In Compression 3.00
BORE HOLE
Pile Cut off Length Below G.L(m) 2.00 Average Void Factor (%) 10.00 FOS In Uplift 2.50
Parameters of Pile
Reduced Level of Borehole (m) 100.000 Critical Depth (Pd Level) 20.00 X Pile Diameter Grade of Concrete (M) 35
2
Settlement (Assumed) 12.00 mm (1% of pile diameter) (Assumed)

Calculation sheet for Vertical Compressive and Uplift Load Carrying Capacity
Total
Pile Length Angle of Effective Total Effective Total Net Self
Type of RL of Layer RL of Layer Thickness of Submerged Ultimate Total Skin Total Ultimate pile Safe Pile Capacity Safe Pile Capacity
Layer no Below Cut- Cohesion Internal Bulk Density Overburde Overburden Bearing Capacity Factor Factors for Skin Friction Skin Weight of
Soil Layer Top Bottom Layer Bulk Density Pressure End Bearing friction capacity (compression) (Uplift)
off Level Friction n Pressure Friction pile
Capacity capacity

C Ø Pd Ru K Pdi tan δ Asi α Rf Qu= Ru+ Rf QuS

(m) (m) (m) (m) Kg/cm2 ° (gms/cc) (kN/m3) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) Nc Nq Nγ (kN) (kN/m2) (m2) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (Tonnes) (Tonnes)

1 SM-SC 2.20 98.000 95.800 2.20 0.08 27 1.79 7.75 17.04 17.04 9 12.73 14.47 1.50 8.52 0.51 8.29 1.00 119.09 17.69 6.60
401.35 119.09 31.35 520.45

2 SM-SC 5.20 95.800 92.800 3.00 0.07 26 1.82 8.04 24.13 41.17 9 10.67 12.54 1.50 29.11 0.49 #### 1.00 437.57 36.45 20.05
634.94 318.48 74.10 1072.51

3 SM-SC 8.20 92.800 89.800 3.00 0.06 27 1.84 8.24 24.71 65.88 9 12.73 14.47 1.50 53.53 0.51 #### 1.00 966.80 69.89 39.52
1089.43 529.23 116.85 2056.23
4 SM-SP 11.20 89.800 86.800 3.00 0.00 29 1.91 8.92 26.77 92.66 9 18.14 19.34 1.50 79.27 0.40 #### 1.00 ####### 119.69 59.20
2017.95 536.51 159.60 3521.26
5 SM-SP 14.20 86.800 83.800 3.00 0.00 31 1.91 8.92 26.77 119.43 9 25.84 25.99 1.50 106.04 0.43 #### 1.00 ####### 201.37 85.62
3648.20 772.90 202.35 5924.41

6 SM-SP 15.00 83.800 83.000 0.80 0.00 32 1.92 9.02 7.22 126.65 9 30.85 30.21 1.50 123.04 0.45 3.02 1.00 ####### 242.26 93.86
4603.51 247.82 213.75 7127.54
 SAFE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF BORED CAST IN SITU PILES AS PER IS: 2911 (PART I/SECTION 2)-2010
ESTIMATION OF LATERAL LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF BORED CAST IN-SITU CONCRETE PILE

NAME OF THE PROJECT 0

Pile Diameter (mm) 1200 Ground Water Table (m) 0.00 3.00
(Conservative side) FOS In Compression
BORE HOLE
Pile Cut off Length Below G.L(m) 2.00 Average Void Factor (%) 10.00 2.50
Parameters of Pile FOS In Uplift

100.000 Critical Depth (Pd Level) 20.00 35

Reduced Level of Borehole (m) 2 X Pile Diameter Grade of Concrete (M)
Deflection (Assumed) (y) 12.00mm (1% of pile diameter) (Assumed)

Calculation sheet for Lateral Load Carrying Capacity

Preferable Pile Length Young's Moment of
Type of RL of Layer RL of Layer Thickness Cantilever
Layer no strata up to Below Cut- Cohesion SPT Value Value of Constant Modulus of Inertia of Stiffness factor Type of pile behaviour Depth of Fixity (Zf) Load Capacity of Pile (Lateral)
Soil Layer Top Bottom of Layer Length
depth off Level pile material Pile

C = Clay C N k1 ŋh Ec I R T e=L1 Free Head Fixed Head Free Head Fixed Head

S = Sand (m) (m) (m) (m) Kg/cm2 Average MN/m3 MN/m3 Mpa (m4) (m) (m) (m) (m) (kN) (Tonnes) (kN) (Tonnes)

1 SM-SC S 2.20 98.000 95.800 2.20 0.08 9.50 - 1.30 29580.40 0.10 - 4.71 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -

2 SM-SC S 5.20 95.800 92.800 3.00 0.07 12.50 - 1.76 29580.40 0.10 - 4.43 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -

3 SM-SC S 8.20 92.800 89.800 3.00 0.06 16.67 - 2.36 29580.40 0.10 - 4.18 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -
4 SM-SP S 11.20 89.800 86.800 3.00 0.00 20.88 - 2.97 29580.40 0.10 - 3.99 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -
5 SM-SP S 14.20 86.800 83.800 3.00 0.00 25.40 - 3.62 29580.40 0.10 - 3.84 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -
6 SM-SP S 15.00 83.800 83.000 0.80 0.00 28.92 - 4.12 29580.40 0.10 - 3.74 Long 779.46 79.48
0.00 7.10 8.22 302.61 30.86
 SAFE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF BORED CAST IN SITU PILES AS PER IRC:78-2014
ESTIMATION OF VERTICAL COMPRESSIVE AND UPLIFT LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF BORED CAST IN-SITU CONCRETE PILE

NAME OF THE PROJECT

Pile Diameter (mm) 1200 Ground Water Table (m) 0.00 (Conservative side) FOS In Compression 3.00
BORE HOLE
Pile Cut off Length Below G.L(m) 2.00 Average Void Factor (%) 10.00 FOS In Uplift 2.50
Parameters of Pile
Reduced Level of Borehole (m) 100.000 Critical Depth (Pd Level) 20.00 X Pile Diameter Grade of Concrete (M) 35
3
Settlement (Assumed) 12.00 mm (1% of pile diameter) (Assumed)

Calculation sheet for Vertical Compressive and Uplift Load Carrying Capacity
Total
Pile Length Angle of Effective Total Effective
Type of RL of Layer RL of Layer Thickness of Submerged Ultimate Total Net Self Weight Total Skin Total Ultimate pile Safe Pile Capacity Safe Pile Capacity
Layer no Below Cut- Cohesion Internal Bulk Density Overburde Overburden Bearing Capacity Factor Factors for Skin Friction
Soil Layer Top Bottom Layer Bulk Density Pressure End Bearing Skin Friction of pile friction capacity (compression) (Uplift)
off Level Friction n Pressure
Capacity capacity

C Ø Pd Ru K Pdi tan δ Asi α Rf Qu= Ru+ Rf QuS

(m) (m) (m) (m) Kg/cm2 ° (gms/cc) (kN/m3) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) Nc Nq Nγ (kN) (kN/m2) (m2) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (Tonnes) (Tonnes)

1 SM-SC 2.20 98.000 95.800 2.20 0.07 26 1.75 7.36 16.18 16.18 9 10.67 12.54 1.50 8.09 0.49 8.29 1.00 106.03 14.74 6.22
327.66 106.03 31.35 433.69
2 SM-SC 5.20 95.800 92.800 3.00 0.07 27 1.79 7.75 23.24 39.42 9 12.73 14.47 1.50 27.80 0.51 11.31 1.00 423.99 38.67 19.66
713.61 317.97 74.10 1137.61
3 SM-SC 8.20 92.800 89.800 3.00 0.09 26 1.80 7.85 23.54 62.96 9 10.67 12.54 1.50 51.19 0.49 11.31 1.00 947.39 63.34 38.96
916.10 523.40 116.85 1863.49
4 SM-SP 11.20 89.800 86.800 3.00 0.00 28 1.83 8.14 24.42 87.38 9 15.20 16.72 1.50 75.17 0.38 11.31 1.00 1436.91 103.02 57.30
1594.14 489.52 159.60 3031.05
5 SM-SP 14.20 86.800 83.800 3.00 0.00 30 1.85 8.34 25.01 112.39 9 21.65 22.40 1.50 99.88 0.41 11.31 1.00 2138.80 170.54 81.70
2878.80 701.88 202.35 5017.60

6 SM-SP 15.00 83.800 83.000 0.80 0.00 32 1.89 8.73 6.98 119.37 9 30.85 30.21 1.50 115.88 0.45 3.02 1.00 2372.20 228.27 89.52
4343.60 233.40 213.75 6715.80
 SAFE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF BORED CAST IN SITU PILES AS PER IS: 2911 (PART I/SECTION 2)-2010
ESTIMATION OF LATERAL LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF BORED CAST IN-SITU CONCRETE PILE

NAME OF THE PROJECT 0

Pile Diameter (mm) 1200 Ground Water Table (m) 0.00 3.00
(Conservative side) FOS In Compression
BORE HOLE
Pile Cut off Length Below G.L(m) 2.00 Average Void Factor (%) 10.00 2.50
Parameters of Pile FOS In Uplift

100.000 Critical Depth (Pd Level) 20.00 35

Reduced Level of Borehole (m) 3 X Pile Diameter Grade of Concrete (M)
Deflection (Assumed) (y) 12.00mm (1% of pile diameter) (Assumed)

Calculation sheet for Lateral Load Carrying Capacity

Preferable Pile Length Young's Moment of
Type of RL of Layer RL of Layer Thickness Cantilever
Layer no strata up to Below Cut- Cohesion SPT Value Value of Constant Modulus of Inertia of Stiffness factor Type of pile behaviour Depth of Fixity (Zf) Load Capacity of Pile (Lateral)
Soil Layer Top Bottom of Layer Length
depth off Level pile material Pile

C = Clay C N k1 ŋh Ec I R T e=L1 Free Head Fixed Head Free Head Fixed Head

S = Sand (m) (m) (m) (m) Kg/cm2 Average MN/m3 MN/m3 Mpa (m4) (m) (m) (m) (m) (kN) (Tonnes) (kN) (Tonnes)

1 SM-SC S 2.20 98.000 95.800 2.20 0.07 9.50 - 1.30 29580.40 0.10 - 4.71 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -
2 SM-SC S 5.20 95.800 92.800 3.00 0.07 12.50 - 1.76 29580.40 0.10 - 4.43 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -
3 SM-SC S 8.20 92.800 89.800 3.00 0.09 16.67 - 2.36 29580.40 0.10 - 4.18 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -
4 SM-SP S 11.20 89.800 86.800 3.00 0.00 20.88 - 2.97 29580.40 0.10 - 3.99 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -
5 SM-SP S 14.20 86.800 83.800 3.00 0.00 25.40 - 3.62 29580.40 0.10 - 3.84 Short/Intermediate - -
0.00 - - - -
6 SM-SP S 15.00 83.800 83.000 0.80 0.00 28.92 - 4.12 29580.40 0.10 - 3.74 Long 779.46 79.48
0.00 7.10 8.22 302.61 30.86
SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS FOR SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS BASED ON N – VALUES
Analysis as per IS: 8009(Part 1)-1976,

Clause 9.1.4

BH-1 Settlement of Foundation Based On SPT Value. IS 8009 (P-1)

Size of Footing 6m X 9m
Depth of Footing (METER) 2.5 3.0 4.0
N' value 14 15 14
Friictional Angle 17.4 18.1 18.8
Foundation Width 6.0 6.0 6.0
Foundation Length 9.0 9.0 9.0
Tota l s ettl ement (mm) for Uni t pres s ure of (kg/cm ²) 24.0 23.0 24.0
Foundatioon Pressure (kg/cm²) 1.06 1.51 1.76
Settlement Coresponds to Foundation Pressure (mm)
25.54 34.75 42.29
Depth Factor 0.91 0.87 0.82
Rigidity Factor 0.8 0.8 0.8
Water table Correction for Settlement(Fig. 9) 1.3 1.3 1.3
Final Corrected Settlement (mm) 24.17 31.44 36.07
 BH-2 Settlement of Foundation Based On SPT Value. IS 8009 (P-1)
Size of Footing 6m X 9m
Depth of Footing (METER) 2.5 3.0 4.0
N' value 13 13 15
Friictional Angle 18.1 17.4 18.8
Foundation Width 6.0 6.0 6.0
Foundation Length 9.0 9.0 9.0
Tota l s e ttl e me nt (mm) for Uni t pre s s ure of (kg/cm ²) 26.0 26.0 24.0
Foundatioon Pressure (kg/cm²) 1.13 1.35 1.96
Settlement Coresponds to Foundation Pressure (mm)
29.26 35.04 47.03
Depth Factor 0.92 0.87 0.82
Rigidity Factor 0.8 0.8 0.8
Water table Correction for Settlement(Fig. 9) 1.3 1.3 1.3
Final Corrected Settlement (mm) 28.00 31.70 40.11

BH-3 Settlement of Foundation Based On SPT Value. IS 8009 (P-1)

Size of Footing 6m X 9m
Depth of Footing (METER) 2.5 3.0 4.0
N' value 12 13 15
Friictional Angle 17.4 18.1 18.8
Foundation Width 6.0 6.0 6.0
Foundation Length 9.0 9.0 9.0
Tota l s ettl ement (mm) for Uni t pres s ure of (kg/cm ²) 28.0 26.0 24.0
Foundatioon Pressure (kg/cm²) 1.04 1.48 1.97
Settlement Coresponds to Foundation Pressure (mm)
28.99 38.55 47.29
Depth Factor 0.92 0.87 0.82
Rigidity Factor 0.8 0.8 0.8
Water table Correction for Settlement(Fig. 9) 1.3 1.3 1.3
Final Corrected Settlement (mm) 27.73 34.88 40.33
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS
Site Preparation
The construction site must be suitably prepared. All undesirable materials such as roots, trash or
other foreign materials shall be removed. After clearing and grubbing, the exposed subgrade
should be proof rolled and inspected to check for soft spots and loose
zones. If any soft spots or loose zones are observed during proof rolling, they should be compacted
in place or excavated to firm soil and replaced with properly compacted structural fill material.
Excavation
We anticipate no problems in removal of existing granular soils by normal excavator. For
shallow/deep excavations the sides of excavated area should be sloped properly to make stable for
the period required for the placement of foundation concrete, alternatively the foundation can be
battered to a slope of 1.5H: 1V.
Construction Dewatering
If at the time of our investigation, ground water was encountered at a shallow depth of about 1m
below existing ground level or above placement depth. Hence, ground water will affect all the
construction activities. Suitable method of dewatering systems like pumping from the sumps or
any other suitable methods shall be adopted to keep the foundation area dry during the period of
construction of foundation works.
Recommended Specifications for Compacted Fills and Backfills
With the exception of undesirable material well-graded sand and gravel can be used as structural
and/or general fill. All fill materials should be approved by a qualified geotechnical engineer prior
to placement, pending final grades at the site. The fill material should be placed in layers of 250
mm thickness and should be sprinkled with water as required to ensure adequate compaction. Each
layer should be uniformly compacted by means of suitable equipment of the type required by the
materials composing the fill. All fill should be compacted 95 percent of the maximum modified
proctor density.
Criteria for Selected Granular Fill Material
The selected granular fill material must comply with all the following:
100 % smaller than 50mm size
Liquid limit not exceeding 30
Plasticity index not exceeding 8
Passing sieve #75μ not exceeding 15%
Free from organic matter, harmful chemicals and salts
Conclusion

1. 03 boreholes have been advanced for the proposed project for the “Soil investigation for Static
test facility for “Village-Mohammedpur”
2. Standing water table was not found during boring.
3. In the present case, the superstructure load is not known. Hence a low to moderate column load
has been assumed.
4. The bearing capacity has been calculated as per IS: 6403 & IS: 8009(P-I), the sample
calculations are attached herewith.
5. It is suggested that a rectangular Footing & Circular Footing foundation may be considered
suitable for the proposed structures for respective depth mentioned here with at depth below the
OGL, restricted to the Maximum SBC of 17.0 t/m2 for higher 4.0 meter explored depth
corresponding to evaluated settlement.
6. However considering the SBC as mentioned in this memorandum, the designer may estimate
the depth & Size of footing as per requirement.
7. For the safety of the structure a tie beam may be provided, to avoid the differential settlement.
If the column load varies considerably, in such case also the tie beams become essential to avoid
differential settlement.
8. Due to seismic intensity structure may fall in dangerous situation so, due precautions may be
taken to design the foundations of building as per IS:4326 and IS:1893.
SITE PHOTOGRAPH
*** END OF REPORT ***