Banach On Linear Operations
Banach On Linear Operations
ear dimensions. We say that, for two spaces of type (F), (1) dimiE^dimiEi
if E is isomorphic with a linear closed sub-space of Ei; that dimiE^dimiEi
if also (2) dimiEi^dimiE, while d i i m £ < d i m i E i if (1) is satisfied but (2) is not.
If neither (1) nor (2) is satisfied, the linear dimensions of E and E\ are said to
be incomparable. I t should be observed that, while two isomorphic spaces are
of t h e same linear dimensions, there exist separable spaces (B) which are not
isomorphic although their linear dimensions are the same. Special attention
is given here to spaces (Lp) and (lp). I t is shown t h a t if dimz(Z>)==dimj(/«),
where/), q>l, then p = q) if Kp<2<q, then the linear dimensions of (Lp)
and (/«) are incomparable; if Kp^2, then dimj(L 2 ) < d i m i ( i > ) ; if dimi(Lp)
<dirm(Z,«), where p, q>l, then £ = g = 2; the condition p = q = 2 is necessary
and sufficient t h a t dimj(i>) =dimz(/ a ); if l<p^2t then d i m j ( I > ) > d i i m ( ^ ) .
The Appendix (18 pp.) contains an additional discussion of the weak conver-
gence of elements and of functional. T h e book closes with 21 pages of addi-
tional remarks containing historical information and statements of various
generalizations of the results in the text, as well as numerous unsolved prob-
lems. These remarks reveal t h a t the whole subject is in a state of vigorous de-
velopment. The usefulness of many of these remarks would be considerably
greater if they contained hints indicating how the results in question have been
obtained. The exposition as a rule is clear and detailed, although not easy in
several places. The number of misprints (of which only two are corrected in the
list of Errata) is not negligible.
I n conclusion the reviewer may express his conviction that Banach's mono-
graph should occupy a permanent and honorable place on the desk of every
one who is interested in the theory of linear operations, to be replaced only by
subsequent, corrected and augmented editions, which undoubtedly will follow
before long.
J. D. TAMARKIN
SAKS ON I N T E G R A T I O N